[...]descriptor (sharh-dahande شرح دهنده) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> transparent utterance ='lgc'>~ ="trms">rhetorically un="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluttered argument
="trms">literature is snafu
how ="trms">authorship (dead or alive) feeds ="trms">authority='qstn'>?
What has been packaged as terror can be in fact misleading.
="trms">authority is the most elusive of terms that inform ="trms">relations, and yet no politics, no family, no pride of accomplishment can exist without it
="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%">
for ="ppl">Arendt, ="trms">authority is an undeletable term, key to any grasp of politics
="trms">authority ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">rhetoric of persuasion
="ppl">Plato's ="trms">authority of philosophy='lgc'>: in an effort both to ="trms">memorialize and to exact revenge for the verdict on ="ppl">Socrates. (as if ="ppl">Socrates didn't have any bullying tendencies in his persuasive energies.)
a recovery operation
the ‘need’ for ="trms">authority
(="ppl">Arendt='lgc'>:) “It was after ="ppl">Socrates’ death that ="ppl">Plato began to discount persuasion (and argument) as insufficient for the guidance of men and to seek for something ="trms">liable to compel them without using external means of violence.” ='lgc'>==> a power that renounces power; coercion without violence, (invention of hell, is it nonviolent='qstn'>?! a more earthbound ="trms">rhetoric of persuasion='qstn'>?!)
(when we are out of master/slave ="trms">relationship) expert knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge commands confidence and obtains compliance (without force nor persuasion); soft coercion as="trms">sociated with reason ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Plato's philosopher-king ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**“="trms">Authority establishes ="trms">relationality ="trms">prior to command, promising compliance in the absence of force or argument”='strcls'>** (="ppl">Avital)
aspects of the ="trms">authority that might take in or shake up the other without harm
="trms">historical comfort zones ...and ...the ongoing torment of ="trms">worldlessness
(="ppl">Avital,) are the mourners of ="trms">authority masking another loss for which “="trms">authority” would be a cover='qstn'>?
="trms">Greek way of handling='lgc'>:
domestic affairs ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> persuasion
foreign affairs ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> force and violence
='strcls'>*="trms">authority of the Father
="trms">ontological proof of God's existence (Kojeve contends) rests on the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical placement of divine ="trms">authority as the ="trms">authority of the Father, who is seen as cause='strcls'>*
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> paternal ="trms">authority in power and political ="trms">authority ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> as ="trms">author of a work who exerts ="trms">authority over the ‘Oeuvre’
father/judge/="nms">Pir='lgc'>: the principal figure holding together political and ethical qualities of existence ='lgc'>~ imago (in psychoanalysis is an idealized image of someone='lgc'>--usually a parent='lgc'>--formed in ="trms">childhood), firm but benevolent caretaking, funding sources of divine ="trms">authority, hierarchical hold, ="trms">categorical imperative, a secure ground from which commands can be issued, “Achtung!”,
="prgrph">-="trms">authority subsists on borrowed transcendence
="prgrph">-="trms">authority produces effects of respectful adherence
="prgrph">-softening the space of committed citizenry (ground for political relatedness)
="prgrph">-is it possible to keep ="trms">authority separate from respect='qstn'>? what this se="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion assures='qstn'>?
(="nms">Pir's ="trms">authority nearing the) ="trms">sublime regions of human relatedness
Kojeve > What accounts for the unconditional surrender of human reactivity='qstn'>?
legitimate principle of coercion
God is always the God of our ="trms">ancestors ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> character of “tradition”
where violence begins or what gets counted as violence='qstn'>?
the discourse of effacement (امحاء emha’, self-effacement='lgc'>: withdrawing into the background, making yourself inconspicuous)
is there an ="trms">authority outside inequality='qstn'>? ="trms">responsible a="trms">symmetry, the egological space, ="trms">tropes of domination='qstn'>?
='prcnt'>%this is anout the quality of a="trms">symmetry='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--(are we still in the realm of the human='qstn'>?)
="ppl">Levinas tactics is ="trms">spectacular, he runs down patriarchy and meets the ma="trms">jestic escalade of the absolute other, he doesn't escape ="trms">internment (toghif توقیف)
='lgc'>[patriarchy='lgc'>: when it is “of course” obvious who is the mother='lgc'>]
(where do we go with helplessness directed by the destruction of the ="trms">world='qstn'>?)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='lgc'>[="ppl">Sennett='lgc'>] on ="trms">authority, trust and cooperation
...in both a subtle and a coherent ="trms">social structure
inequality makes a profound ="trms">difference in the lives of ="trms">children
“earned ="trms">authority” manages the everyday experience of inequality
cultures in which the ='strcls'>*dramaturgical display of yourself='strcls'>* is foregrounded ='lgc'>=/= diplomacy as model for ="trms">social ="trms">relationships
face="trms">book, an engineered ="trms">social ="trms">network organized for display ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">communication
in capitalism, in firms people at the top has more power but less ="trms">authority, and that is a problem.
in reverse, ="trms"nttrm="learn,clear,Clearl,Olearius">Lear loses its power but keeps his ="trms">authority, his lag on administrative change.
="trms">authority is a bound, a volunteriy obidience and care-giving
parent-="trms">children='lgc'>: something the ="trms">child needs desperitly, they need direction, they need people not only as guids but as witnesses of what they are doing.
the destructive charismatic authoiry in politics
tests if he/she can keep himself together
the charisma of the user on face="trms">book (marat, jonathan, etc., but both are also very good at face to face ="trms">communication)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="ppl">Sennett
we don't know how to use ="trms">material objects and machines well
="trms">craftsmanship='lgc'>: the quest to make physical things well
="lsts lst1">•how the head and hand are connected
="lsts lst1">•doing something well for its own sake ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">skill (not honoured in ="trms">modern ="trms">society)
='lgc'>==> free the ="trms">craftsman (="ppl">Sennett)
="large lg1" stl="font-size:145%">
in many ="trms">social ="trms">relations we do not know exactly what we need from others – or what they ought to want from us
cooperation as a ="trms">craft ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">skill of understanding and ="trms">responding to one another
="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban design is a ="trms">craft in peril (dar khatar)
="lsts lst1">•too much ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban design ='lgc'>==> homogeneous and ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid
="lsts lst1">•="trms">modern built forms ='lgc'>==> only a faint imprint of personal and shared experience
="ppl">Sennett ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (better understanding of) ‘="trms">material ="trms">craftsmanship ='lgc'>+ ="trms">social cooperation’ ='lgc'>==> cities better made
‘homo faber project’='lgc'>: the ancient idea of Man as his or her own maker, man as a maker of life through concrete practices
="lsts lst1">•limits on desire and will
="lsts lst1">•the experience of other people's needs (which cannot be reconciled with our own)
='lgc'>+ to recognize and honour what lies beyond us (and before us)
="trms">social ="trms">relations ='and'>& physical environment
issues of practical ="trms">skill, tool, meaning, value
='strcls'>***the rebellious ="trms">child (in me)
United States has become an intensely tribal ="trms">society
='strcls'>*tribalism='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[= adverse to getting along with those who differ, solidarity with others like yourself, ='and'>& “thinking you know what other people are like without knowing them"='lgc'>], in the form of nationalism, destroyed Europe during the first half of the 20th century
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> complex ="trms">societies='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•workers flowing across borders
="lsts lst1">•="trms">different ethnicities, races and ="trms">religions
="lsts lst1">•diverging ways of sexual and family life
“The ‘self’ is a com="trms">posite of sentiments, affiliations and behaviors which seldom fit neatly together; any call for tribal unity will reduce this personal complexity.”
="prgrph">-="ppl">Sennett
(for ="ppl">Aristotle='lgc'>:) city='lgc'> = synoikismos(= coming together of people from diverse family tribes='lgc'>--each ='strcls'>*oikos='strcls'>* having its own ="trms">history, allegiances, property, family gods)
='lgc'>[some my german friends are making us all poor in not recognizing this, that similar people cannot bring a city into existence. city ="trms">obliges people to think about and deal with others who have ="trms">different
loyalties to (="trms">linguistic ="trms">differences). Germany, lacking direct experience of others, because of lesser colonial encounters in its ="trms">history, falls back on fearful fantasies with the new refugees coming. ="trms">integration, a bad ="trms">response to the problems of living with ="trms">difference='lgc'>]
(="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Robin,Robot,Robert,Robocop">Robert Putnam='lgc'>:) people who live in homogeneous local ="trms">communities appear more ="trms">sociably inclined towards and curious about others in the larger ="trms">world ='lgc'>: first- hand experience does not weaken stereotypes
="prgrph">-the case of Brussels='lgc'>: withdraw from neighbours who differ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to hibernate
attitudes
actual behavior
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]cooperation='lgc'>: an exchange in which the participants benefit from the encounter
can be informal as well as formal='lgc'>: experience of ="trms">mutual pleasure in a bar exchange gossip
difficult kind of cooperation='lgc'>: join people who='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•have separate or conflicting ="trms">interests
="lsts lst1">•do not feel good about each other
="lsts lst1">•are unequal
="lsts lst1">•do not understand one another
="lsts lst1">•(="trms">different faith ="trms">communities)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>==> ="trms">responsiveness as an ethical dis="trms">position
rituals of civility
as small as ‘please’ and ‘thank you,’ put abstract notions of ="trms">mutual respect into practice
in the spirit of generosity, let's not ="trms">write off the banker (or the Mullah) as a human being ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> instead of “fuck you” how do we ="trms">respond to our ="trms">differences in a difficult ="trms">social environment such as contemporary ="nms">Iran ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what ="trms">skills are needed for this hard cooperation='qstn'>? ='lgc'>--="ppl">Sennett='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dialogic
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
what remains from christianity after its self-deconstruction='qstn'>? (="ppl">Nancy)
(what theology doesn't know about itself='qstn'>?) recovered from the repressive power of ="trms">religion
="ppl">Nancy's “shattered ="trms">love” is the stuff of ="ppl">Hafez
='at'>#="trms">love (and ="trms">greeting='qstn'>?) doesn't belong to the realm of giveable things
="ppl">Lacan's de="trms">finition of ="trms">love consists in giving what one does not have, (filling emptiness with emptiness) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to give something i ‘would’ have='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (giving that which is not a property, not even one's self,) to give behind or beyond any subject, any self='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*the giving of the fact that i cannot possess myself='strcls'>* ='lgc'>==> ‘to give'='lgc'> = 'to give up’
='strcls'>***="trms">love='lgc'>: to share the impossibility of being a self='strcls'>***
='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Nancy's) ‘body’ (of political thought)='lgc'>: not as an organicity, but of ="trms">community as the living to share precisely an impossibility of being-in-common (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">ontologize the ="trms">community, after the death of God, ="ppl">Rousseau='lgc'>: ="trms">community of mankind as the foundation of politics ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “man” comes from the “contract” and not reverse)
='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--> “giving” the (="ppl">Derridean) ‘gift’ cannot succeed if the giver knows about his/her gift; ='strcls'>*un="trms">presentable='strcls'>*
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> politics and the political always implies fulfillment, law, closed space, ='strcls'>*closure='strcls'>*
(="nms">Pir's) heaven of value
(="ppl">Bergson's) supplementary soul
there is a nihi="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic way in which we destroy
“everything is political” ='lgc'>=/= everything is directly ="trms">ontologically political ='lgc'>==> totalitarianism='lgc'>: everything belongs to law ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> make law about anything (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Plato's political theology='lgc'>: thought is founded on something; - ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Varinia, “management of justice”)
national ="trms">aestheticism
over-educated ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? brainwashed
='lgc'>[in my ="trms">lectures i am trying to teach something (="ppl">Heidegger, ="ppl">Sa'di, etc.) in ‘a certain way,’ and that ‘certain way’ touches me and i hope touches my audience, even if one don't understand much of it at the time of ="trms">lecture. i am trying to think by the outside, what comes from outside, being touched by it. ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right now in ="nms">apass this outside consists of my (living) peers, getting their quantity of imposed ideas and try to work with that. to ‘take part'='lgc'>]
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
(how='qstn'>?) the exposure of violence becomes the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of violence (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Mona)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
a preoccupation (of someone/yours) ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> analytical solution/terms (for example ‘="trms">aesthetics’ and ‘gender’ for ="ppl">Strathern)
gift (produced to be seen) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> moments of performance ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*creating a context of display='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]gift='lgc'>: participate in and generate ="trms">internal ="trms">relations ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> commodities='lgc'>: participate in and generate external ="trms">relations
you gain prestige in what you give
='strcls'>*there is a lot of ambiguity about what can be seen and what cannot be seen='strcls'>* (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- this must be understood for any one who is invested in ‘showing’)
='strcls'>***='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the alternation between what you conceal and what you reveal (is='lgc'>[='qstn'>?='lgc'>] at the heart of thinking about creativity, about reproduction, about the perpetuation of ="trms">society, about the perpetuation of ="trms">relations)
exchange wealth between two clan groups
wealth
="lsts lst1">•has an ="trms">aesthetic form
="lsts lst1">•has to be grown as well as exchanged
="lsts lst1">•must be accumulated privately and secretly
="lsts lst1">•must be revealed at the ='strcls'>*moment of transfer='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•has to take a proper form ='lgc'>~ recognized by others as appropriate
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">aesthetic='lgc'> = a proper form (at the moment of revelation) that other people have to ="trms">respond
(='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> european notion of ="trms">aesthetic='lgc'> = eliciting a sense of appreciation of beauty)
(my sister's wedding had/created) an appropriate form
='strcls'>**** exchange ="trms">situations ='lgc'>[shows, exhibitions, events, weddings, etc.='lgc'>] has to appear in a certain form, otherwise people will not recognize it, otherwise they fail to impress people ='strcls'>****
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Foad
="prgrph">-what are ="nms">Tehran's contemporary contexts in which we can see exchanges working='qstn'>?
younger people are impressing one another in terms of ="trms">consuming or participation in sports, or mobile phones, or whatever ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they create ="trms">different kinds of ="trms">relations (='at'>#telegram ="nms">iran='qstn'>?)
(how among my freinds we impress one another='qstn'>?)
younger people, invest value in ="trms">different things from what older people do
money does not have anything else but number
things that shine, things that g="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen, things that sparkle ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a sense in which these objects ='strcls'>*give off a ="trms">presence='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Janina='lgc'>] and people are ="trms">affected by this
='strcls'>*quality of shininess='strcls'>* indicates the successful ="trms">intervention of ="trms">ancestral spirits ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a spiritual condition (acquainted with health)
they must display to be regarded as worthwhile
with mobile phones='lgc'>: what is going on here, what is their value, how are they circulating, how do people regard them='qstn'>?
(ibn ebn ابن) people belong because their fathers belonged and so forth ='lgc'>+ what they give away, the (gift) shells, can be regarded as female ='lgc'>: items that have come into men's possessions (='lgc'>=/= ="frds scrmbld">Karin's gifts)
="prgrph">-so the shells are passive objects, women are/were (traditionally), classically regarded as objects in a similar way and were given the names of shells
='strcls'>***how to think about ="trms">vocabulary:='strcls'>***
="prgrph">-i cannot start using economics of the ="trms">market to describe what i am talking about
="prgrph">-in the ="trms">vocabulary of gift exchange (="ppl">Strathern) may be able to find the ="trms">vocabulary of analysis (like an artist choosing the color)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Strathern choice='lgc'>: the ="trms">vocabulary of gift exchange might give her the ="trms">vocabulary by which to start describing, is an ='strcls'>*artificial choice='strcls'>*. the ="trms">vocabulary of the gift economy gives her a lot of terms in which to understand. but those terms are only useful for the purposes of understanding that particular set of ="trms">data, and if i then leave that ="trms">data, and if i follow these objects as they move out of the highlands, and if they became, if they came into an art ="trms">market, then absolutely what we would be dealing with is commodities='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">situated knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges ='lgc'>[='at'>#SK='lgc'>], ='at'>#import function
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='strcls'>*="trms">literature='lgc'> = the ="trms">question of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">matter of novels and ="trms">poems)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
what is the ="trms">language of war='qstn'>?
(="ppl">Keenan > Weizman='lgc'>:) we need to understand war as discourse ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*war='lgc'> = a threatened discourse='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-The ="trms">language component of war exists in the gap between the level of destruction which is “possible” and the level of destruction which is “actually applied” in every given ="trms">situation.
when war is no longer a means but an end in itself(='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? Hezbollah
deterrence='lgc'>: a means of controlling a person's behavior through negative motivational influences
“We are law-abiding, and we go ="trms">wild.”
="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%">
violence stripped of ="trms">semiotics
The logic, the reason, of conflict is thus political ... for Clausewitz, politics is essentially logic, logos, discourse, people reasoning with one another, thinking and speaking, exchanging
="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%">
='at'>@Luis, why conflict could be my concern='qstn'>? because it marks the breakdown of politics, when we can no longer have a conversation, engage in the game, where there is no possibility of further exchange, there is fighting
fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure ='lgc'>==> use of force
Saskia Sassen called the attacks of September 11 “A Message From the Global South”
she wrote that the attacks bore witness to a fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure in ="trms">communication or to a “="trms">translation problem”
for her the ="trms">language of September 11 attacks was clear
Sassen's d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous and depraved rationalization of September 11='lgc'>: south is speaking in a ="trms">language that needs no ="trms">translation
="large lg5" stl="font-size:165%">
the word ‘conflict’ (is coined as a discoursive necessity and) bears with itself an analysis of politics which sees it as a rational enterprise, a structured confrontation or conversation aimed at compromise or reconciliation, the exchange of ="trms">demands and the negotiation of outcomes ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a ="trms">Greek tradition ='lgc'>: to protect politics from irrationality and p[...]