[...]naugural violence='strcls'>* ='lgc'>+ the institution of division of labor

what was the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal doing on ="trms">stage before the birth of tragedy='qstn'>?

mythical o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin ='lgc'>==create='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">stories (="trms">fabulous, ="trms">fabulating)='lgc'>: ='lgc'>[="trms">storytelling='lgc'>: seeking for='lgc'>] means of making a vanished experience available again in the contemporary ="trms">world (='lgc'>~ ="trms">storytelling) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/= ='strcls'>*="trms">storymaking='lgc'>: creation of ="trms">memories, the construction of a ="trms">history that renders the ="trms">present and the future richer in possibilities='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[not just for your self and your kind, as Hollywood or the brands do it='lgc'>: personalize experiences at scale='lgc'>]

='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals do not appear to work, in the referential framework that emerges from the division of labor / ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion from labor ='lgc'>[='thdf'>the idea of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals have been transformed into “potential ="trms">instruments of satisfaction"='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> it is held that what ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals do, they do it “="trms">naturally” ='lgc'>: as if answering our needs is the same thing as ='strcls'>*acting ="trms">according to ="trms">nature='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to cooking manga anime Shokugeki no Soma, the ="trms">nature of serving='lgc'>]
='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Despret='lgc'>='lgc'>--> division of labor='lgc'>: a ="trms">matter of dividing='lgc'>: those who explicitly really work ='lgc'>=/= those who are only following a bent in their ="trms">nature (a necessity of a biological rather than a ="trms">historical ="trms">sort)


Baratay ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> possibility of ="trms">writing a ="trms">history from the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal's point of view
='lgc'>+ ="trms">epistemic, conceptual, ideological obstacles

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%"> when the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals start paying attention to what humans are offering ir ="trms">demanding, and then either accept, play for time, resist, refuse... ="trms">stories in which they exhibit unusual ="trms">skills or behaviors='lgc'> = acculturation='lgc'>: acceptance from the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal (not just humans imposing their will), dialogue between the two, influence of the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal upon the human


(thinking about ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals that we raise in order to kill and eat them)
asking breeders='lgc'>: could one in any way way that their ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals collaborate with them and work with them='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•the immediate general ="trms">response is='lgc'>: no ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> yet you hear many ="trms">stories about ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals who did in fact participate in the work of those who were raising them ='lgc'>: they acted in deliberate ways of their own volition

="prgrph">-do ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals work='qstn'>?
the answer to this ="trms">question will change something ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">="ppl">Despret's ="trms">pragmatism) ='strcls'>*="trms">pragmatic ="trms">position='lgc'> = involving a ="trms">question whose answer turns out to have consequences='strcls'>*


(Porcher > Tapper='lgc'>:) ="trms">relationships between human and nonhuman ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals (judging that this ="trms">relationship must have followed a ="trms">historical progression similar to that undergone by the ="trms">relations of production between ="trms">different groups of men)='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. hunting ="trms">societies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">communitarian, ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals are part of the same ="trms">world as humans
="lstsrd">2. domestication ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> slavery
="lstsrd">3. ="trms">pastoralism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> contractual forms of the feudal type
="lstsrd">4. industrial ="trms">societies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">relationships based on means of production and capita="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list ="trms">relationships

Tapper (and Castelluci) raise the possibility that ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals may indeed work, they also close these ="trms">relationships up in a ='strcls'>*single schema='strcls'>* of ownership and exploitation


to in="trms">herit='lgc'>: (not merely receptive,) implies a task, a ="trms">pragmatic act='lgc'> = appropriation

='strcls'>**one's ="trms">heritage is something constructed, and it is constantly transforming itself retroactively='strcls'>** بازگشتی ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> it makes us capable of ="trms">responding and that we in fact ="trms">respond to our ="trms">heritage ='lgc'>=/= simply carrying on a tradition

='strcls'>***things are in="trms">herited, but we become ourselves in carrying out the ="trms">gesture of in="trms">heriting='strcls'>***

(="ppl">="ppl">Harawayian) re-="trms">member='lgc'>: enact the ="trms">past, collect and ="trms">compose ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/= (="ppl">="ppl">Despretian) to in="trms">herit='lgc'>: giving oneself an account of a certain task, which is more than just re="trms">membering
='lgc'>[="trms">storymaking='lgc'>] ='strcls'>*to make a ="trms">story='lgc'> = to reconstruct, to ="trms">fabulate, to offer other ="trms">presents and futures to the ="trms">past='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~/= ="frds">Sina='lgc'>: to ="trms">fabulate='lgc'> = to give other ="trms">pasts to the ="trms">present and future='lgc'>]


="large lg6" stl="font-size:109%"> how to ask the ="trms">question of work properly='qstn'>?
you have to consider ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals as other than victims, ="trms">natural and cultural idiots that ='strcls'>*need to be liberated='strcls'>* despite themselves ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘liberating the ="trms">world of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals'='lgc'> = 'freeing the human ="trms">world of the ="trms">presence of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="trms">fabulation of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal human in the movie How to Train Your Dragon='lgc'>: The Hidden ="trms">World='lgc'>]
='lgc'>=/= telegram's ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals

='strcls'>*humans and ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals must (not just considered together but) always be ="trms">imagined together='strcls'>*

ceasing to consider “='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal='lgc'> = victim” ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (='qstn'>?how in telegram media) ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals involve themselves (since they are not ="trms">natural and cultural idiots), just as human (breeders) are not “exploiting,” but giving, receiving, exchanging, raising, and growing with, their ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals


when ="ppl">="ppl">Despret is putting the ="trms">question of “do ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals work='qstn'>?” to breeders, it is a real experiment ='lgc'>: to explore the rese="trms"nttrm="search">archer's pro="trms">positions with the breeders ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to make them hesitate (='lgc'>~ is about ='strcls'>*what does it mean to speculate in such a way='qstn'>?='strcls'>*) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= means of knowing through information (to gather ="trms">data or opinions) ='lgc'>: “what do breeders think of X='qstn'>?"='lgc'>]


="ppl">="ppl">Despret’ amazing ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigour ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the only place that the ="trms">question (considering whether ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals do work) can be brought forward is the place where only the meaning as="trms">sociated with exploitation can ="trms">matter (in places where both humans and ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals are greatly mistreated)
="prgrph">-place where the evidence of such work is found, are places where ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals are industrially “produced” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> their behaviors appear very de="trms">finitely as belonging to a work ="trms">relationship


director of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal resources ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (in such frame) ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal='lgc'>: occupy the place of an obscure underclass, malleable, serviceable, and disposable in the end

moder feeder operations ='lgc'>--Porcher='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals sometimes wanted to help

asking the breeders='lgc'>: could you help us learn how to ask our ="trms">question so that it has a chance of making sense to other people='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> they also could explore the ='strcls'>*manner in which we were ="trms">obligated to ="trms">formulate our ="trms">questions='strcls'>*


(="ppl">="ppl">Harawayiean) ="trms">responsibility='lgc'>: a ="trms">relationship ="trms">crafted into ="trms">intra-action through which entities, subjects, and objects, come into being

="large lg1" stl="font-size:120%"> lead cow (the one who trusts the breeder, and one the herd trusts, usually is in the front) ='lgc'>=/= dominant cow (in the hierarchy of the herd, is found in the middle of the herd)

a theme in ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal ="trms">technicians
paying attention to ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals='lgc'> = being able to feel the limits that ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals ask us to take into account (more than ="trms">questions of well-being)


='lgc'>[many times='lgc'>] ='strcls'>*work often leaves no evidence behind='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= publishing)
='at'>@="nms">apass


ethology ='lgc'>==teaches='lgc'>='lgc'>==> certain ="trms">questions cannot be answered unless one constructs concrete conditions beforehand ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> those that allow the ="trms">questions to be asked ='lgc'>+ those that render those who ask capable of discerning the answer, capable of grasping it when it emerges

peace-maintaining ="trms">gestures of the cows

why the work of the cows was invisible='qstn'>?
='strcls'>*because work only becomes perceptible when the cows resist='strcls'>* (when they place limit on what can happen) ='lgc'>--shows='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when everything goes correctly it is because of an active investment on the part of the cows
='strcls'>***when everything happens as it should, we don't see the work='strcls'>*** (='lgc'>=/= notion of work in art)
='at'>@="nms">apass

(when they do what has to be done in ="trms">response to an order, cow's) obedience looks “mechanical” (='lgc'>='lgc'>~/=='qstn'>? ="nms">Cinderella's obedience ='lgc'>[='qstn'>?not in a mechanical age='lgc'>])
='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= art's work ='lgc'><='lgc'>== conflict that disturb this order of things='lgc'>]

(the fieldwork of ="ppl">="ppl">Despret helping me to realize that) ='strcls'>*the moments without conflict='strcls'>* are not something merely ="trms">natural, self-evident, or mechanical ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they require from the cows (or someone whose work is invisible) the activity of pacification, in which they make compromises (groom each other, exchange ="trms">gestures of politeness, etc.)
="lsts lst1">•dogs and horses who are asked to serve as therapeutic assistants for humans='lgc'>: these ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals often have a passive air and seem to simply be letting things happen ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*their cooperation is based on a remarkable ability to hold themselves back='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- i saw this, in a theater piece for blind, i was sitting next to two assistant dogs, and could feel strongly their efforts to sit motionless in the dark within the crowds='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> but non of this is perceived...

only by observing the many ways that cows can resist the breeders, doing something other than what is expected of them ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the rese="trms"nttrm="search">archer could see how they are actively invested in the work ='lgc'>: when the cows show that they are unwilling to do what is wanted ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> their “good will” appeared (the effect of their willingness)
="lsts lst1">•this is an ="trms">interested problem ='at'>@="nms">apass, ='thdf'>the notion of asking participants to participate in an “active” way ='lgc'>=/= ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal work ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “working well for an artist='lgc'> = violating normative organization (recommendations, regulations, procedures, ="trms">codes, ="trms">specifications)"='lgc'> = تمرد tamarod recalcitrance='lgc'>: practical or collective intelligence appearing when intentional mistakes are made, or when feigned misunderstanding leads to active disobedience='strcls'>*****


Vicki ="ppl">Hearne ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">="ppl">Despret
why dogs often drop the stick they fetch a couple of feet in front of you. it is a way for the dog to give to the human a sense of the limits to the ="trms">authority that she is ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready to concede, with an almost mathematical precision, reminding us that not everything goes without saying ='heart'>♥

="large lg18" stl="font-size:125%">
‘="trms">communication with ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals='lgc'> = being together engaged in work’ ='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•learning patience in regard to them
="lsts lst1">•respecting them as they are ='lgc'>==imply='lgc'>='lgc'>==> you know them ='and'>& recognise them
="lsts lst1">•

='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo

we are required to think about people and ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals as ='strcls'>**connected in a single experience='strcls'>** (in which they jointly constitute their identities) ='at'>#="trms">chimera
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (="trms">obligates us to consider) the manner in which they keep faith with each other ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they ="trms">respond to each other through the consequences of their action ='and'>& their ="trms">responses are part of the consequences (='lgc'>=/= act based on shared assumptions)

='lgc'>{being a victim ='lgc'>==imply='lgc'>='lgc'>==> passivity ='lgc'>+ all its consequences='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal is not a victim='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[because:='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•saying “='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal='lgc'> = victim” ='lgc'>=/= (="ppl">="ppl">Despret's) mode of being engaged in ="trms">question
="lsts lst1">•(don't forget that) ='strcls'>***تقصیرپذیری culpability is easier to tolerate than ="trms">responsiblity مسئولیتپذیری='strcls'>*** (because ="trms">responsibility prevents the ="trms">question from being closed)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>***a victim does not invite curiosity='strcls'>*** ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- curiosity is essential in ="trms">relations in which two beings learn to look and to look back (="ppl">="ppl">Despret ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway)

victim ='lgc'>=/= (="ppl">="ppl">Despret’ ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal, ="frds">Sina's ="nms">Cinderella) more alive, more ="trms">present, they invite more ="trms">question ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they get the chance to become ="trms">interesting
="lsts lst1">•a ="nms">Cinderella who does her job engages us in a totally ="trms">different manner than a ="nms">Cinderella who is the victim of the ="trms">authority of her evil mother and wicked sisters


(from a clinical standpoint ='lgc'>+ in human terms) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]work='lgc'>: ="trms">gestures, know-how, the involvement of the body and the intelligence, the ability to analyze, ="trms">interpret and react to ="trms">situations='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•work transforms the ="trms">world
="lsts lst1">•work objectifies intelligence
="lsts lst1">•work produces subjectivity

work, not only has to do with economic rationality, but participate in other forms of rationality, in ="trms">relation to='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•identities
="lsts lst1">•in ="trms">relationship to God
="lsts lst1">•="trms">obligation and cures
="lsts lst1">•obedience to ="trms">Nature or mastering it
="lsts lst1">•moral rationality ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Marx's) work='lgc'>: de="trms">finitve form of expressing their life (a mode of life, Dejours='lgc'>: assertion of their existence)

‘work='lgc'> = a source of recognition’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> work =
="lsts lst1">•a source of pleasure
="lsts lst1">•a practice in the construction of our identities
="lsts lst1">•a judgment about beauty (of something being well done that ='strcls'>*relies upon the recognition of one's peers='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is something i realized in ="nms">apass) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> judgment about ='strcls'>*bond='strcls'>* (that concerns) the means of the work's doing ='lgc'>[and places where humans and ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals share things, achieve things together, accomplish themselves='lgc'>] (='lgc'>=/= the work as accomplished)='lgc'>: a ='strcls'>**reciprocal judgment (of bond ='and'>& beauty)='strcls'>** ='lgc'>[bond='lgc'>: judgment about the conditions of a life lived together ='strcls'>***even in ="trms">situations that are radically a="trms">symmetrical='strcls'>***='lgc'>] through which the breeder and his ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal ='lgc'>[also participants in ="nms">apass='lgc'>] may recognize each other

(="ppl">="ppl">Haraway's) work='lgc'>: a process that ="trms">crafts capabilites to answer for ='lgc'>+ answer to

="ppl">="ppl">Despret's notion of ‘judgment of the bond at the center of all ="trms">relations’ ='lgc'>=/= Wittgenestein (famous and meaningless observation='lgc'>: “if ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals could speak we would get shouted at every day” ='lgc'>: highly ="trms">anthropocentric notion of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal as victim)


(Porcher's radical idea of) we work with ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals in order to be able to live with them, not the other way round

='lgc'>[="nms">Tehran's need of='lgc'>] speculative ="trms">fabulation='lgc'>: ="trms">stories that whets our appetite for possibilites, that open ="trms">imagination ='lgc'>=/= idyllic ="trms">story of a golden age

(="ppl">="ppl">Despret, Porcher, ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway) work='lgc'>: locus of unexpected encounter, the possibility of our ="trms">communication

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

eternal turtle

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

new ="trms">zoonotic infectious diseases ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> new human-='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal ="trms">relationship
vast silent reservoir in aquatic ="trms">birds
confinement, deprivation, stress
global biodiversity crisis ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> there is no monopoly on ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal cruelty
mass-production of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal suffering
unsanitary practices
(we make) mad cow disease='lgc'>: herbivores ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> carnivores ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cannibals

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='strcls'>*discussion across ideologies='strcls'>*
partisan mindset ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">social belonging='lgc'>]='lgc'>: ideology provides an ostensive set of tools (sometimes unconsciously) for analyzing a complex ="trms">social ="trms">world='lgc'> = orientation
="lsts lst1">•partisan operative mentality یک نوع ذهن عملی
="lsts lst1">•normal is ="trms">ontologically privileged over abnormalities (or vice versa)
="lsts lst1">•left-wing identity politics='lgc'>: reductive us-versus-them mentality ='lgc'>+ moral panic
i am influenced by the ="trms">demand of the other ='lgc'>[= (="ppl">Lacanian) ="trms">socio-psychic projection of a Big Other that stands in for the ="trms">presence of the ="trms">ontologically non-existent group ="trms">narrative='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> moral grounds for living
(='qstn'>?) reverting back to your ="trms">material status (as private individuals) ='lgc'>=/= looking after ideological stability and economy
thins that don't work with when talking to partisan mentality='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•factual argumentation
="lsts lst1">•punching them
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Kantian argument for the intrinsic value of all human lives
(what generally don't work='lgc'>:) reminding one's political rivals of facts ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Levinasian) the trace of the other


(='qstn'>?why i need or not need) intellectual adversarie ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= caricatures for shooting practice='lgc'>]
(the banal and continuous hyper-polarized political partisanship of) ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right-wing populism ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">Social justice activism
(our agreement on) moral and ="trms">methodological ="trms">priority of the individual

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg22" stl="font-size:135%">
https://merionwest.com/2018/07/31/purity-politics-is-ruining-progressivism/
prison='lgc'>: mechanism available to remove people from ="trms">society

='lgc'>[my problem with='lgc'>: political philosophy (of) authentic radical politics ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>] (academic or artistic) critical scholarship ='lgc'>[critical race theory, post-colonial theory, gender studies, etc. ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{busy with ='strcls'>**="trms">systemic grievances='strcls'>** (white supremacy, colonialism, racism, etc,)='lgc'>} ='lgc'>+ left-wing identity politics ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*leftist purity politics='strcls'>*='lgc'>] universalizing a kind of moral complicity ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a reductionist ="trms">social ="trms">ontology of guilt and victimization ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{
="lsts lst1">•='thdf'>bad idea of the whole (liberalism) is ="trms">historically as="trms">sociated with, for example, colonialism ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> all of its parts (people, ideas, etc.) are equally as="trms">sociated with colonialism
="lsts lst1">•='thdf'>the idea of ="trms">modernity ='lgc'>+ the rise of the individual ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (a sense of) loss of ="trms">community
='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•participation
="lsts lst1">•horizontalism
="lsts lst1">•institutional distrust
="lsts lst1">•ad hoc organizations

forensic architecture='lgc'>: purifying itself of (and overcome) injustice ='lgc'>=/= meaningful progressive change

(Occupy movement, protest mentality ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how left-wing purity politics missed the) consequences electoral capacity, electoral politics
(not knowing how to use) liberal institutions

="lsts lst1">•(thinking with Bruzzone ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) we need more ='strcls'>*impure politics='strcls'>* ='lgc'>: (reform ='and'>& compromise mentality)
="lsts lst2">◦how to transform knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge into ='strcls'>*electoral mobilization='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= ="frds scrmbld">Pierre's ="trms">interest in ="trms">fiction, ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo's ="trms">interest in a morally pure collective future)
="lsts lst2">◦how to form alliances with groups whom you have grave doubts
="lsts lst1">•we don't need ='strcls'>*hoard of like-minded people sharing collective ="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger and disgust at injustice='strcls'>*



post="trms">modern conservatism='lgc'>: ="trms">="trms">empirical / ideological
neoliberal ="trms">societies='lgc'>: hierarchies tolerated by citizens so long as the economy continues to prosper



something happens ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> together ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">social group

entitative='lgc'>: the quality of groupiness, a perception that the people together are a group ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*perception of similarity='strcls'>*

="trms">interaction based on ="trms">interdependence ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">social group

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]group='lgc'>: experience of ="trms">social identity

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">embody='lgc'>: empathetically experience ="trms">situations ‘from outside’
(="ppl">="ppl">Despret raising the ="trms">question) ='strcls'>*what can we do or what are we allowed to do with our bodies when we are with our ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals='qstn'>?='strcls'>*

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]empathy='lgc'>: bodies that undo and redo each other (reciprocally though not ="trms">symmetrically) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= experiencing with one's own body what the other experiences='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> possibilites of an ="trms">embodied ="trms">communication

feeling ='and'>& emotions are not alone in making up what life is all about

(="ppl">="ppl">Despret researching) ways in which ="trms">scientists’ bodies are actively being involved while they are observing ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals
='lgc'>--="frds">Sina='lgc'>='lgc'>--> becoming describable as a body ='lgc'>[that moves, walks, bears, diffuses, smells, makes noise, follows, ...='lgc'>]

the old rule of “human bodies shouldn't ="trms">interfere in a properly ="trms">scientific research process ='lgc'>=/= Lorenz='lgc'>:
...feed his jackdaw with worms
...attempted to teach him to fly
...swam with the geese
='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Despret='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Lorenz aimed at elucidating ‘meaning’ in and through the ="trms">relationships he sustained with the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals he was studying ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•he understood for a little goose what mother is/means by letting his own body be caught in that meaning of mother
="lsts lst1">•he achieved what ‘companionship’ is/means for a jackdaw through being fed and playing with, and flying lessons
="lsts lst1">•
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***what ="trms">matters in the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal's ="trms">world='lgc'> = what bears meaning from their point of view='strcls'>***


="trms">presence
='strcls'>*if the ="trms">scientists body is evoked, it is never for itself nor is it named as such ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when seeking the body, we are offered a surprisingly abstract concept='lgc'>: “="trms">presence” (under the guise of “="trms">presence of the observer”) ='lgc'>=/= body
="prgrph">-the ="trms">presence has no skin, it does not sweat, nor does it eat, sleep, dream, fear ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">presence='lgc'>: the perceived body which never acknowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges itself as a body (there is no ="trms">presence that could be unperceived in one way or in an other)='lgc'> = dis="trms">embodied body ='lgc'><='lgc'>== ='strcls'>*="trms">science='lgc'>: the cognitive activity par excellence='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•ob="trms">literates the actual ="trms">presence of the observer ='lgc'>--understood='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (in terms of a) convenient and non-problematized split “="trms">presence ='lgc'>=/= absence”
="lsts lst1">•(='qstn'>?if these attempts succeed in) reducing the reactivity of the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal to the rese="trms"nttrm="search">archer ='lgc'>=/= ="nms">="trms">wildboyz
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘not having a body'='lgc'> = a mean to pre="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clude (to prevent or to avoid) ='strcls'>**the always possible reciprocity of the encounter='strcls'>** ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> aliens are watching us!='lgc'>]
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘having a body’ discloses and renders perceptible (it is the actual condition of) the very existence of reciprocity of the encounter


how ="trms">scientists (and artists) construe their ="trms">presence in the field
='strcls'>*the will to be there without being there='strcls'>*

the problematic “='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals react ='lgc'>=/= ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal don't react”

(also in art ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ='strcls'>***the regime of distrust of influence='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">fable of ‘artist's o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal ="trms">interiority'='lgc'>]


="prgrph">-='strcls'>*- what does ‘meaningful’ means='qstn'>? -='strcls'>*-

="trms">scientists aim to find new ="trms">methods to focus on those behaviors that are most meaningful to the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals themselves
="lsts lst1">•Shirly Strum ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> I tried to let the baboons themselves “tell” me what was ‘important’ (-how a tree can tell you what is important to them='qstn'>?) -with the baboonss='lgc'>: nothing made them believe that she could be a baboon, so she decided after a while that she could try to urinate while staying among the baboons ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> surprise (='lgc'>=/= trying not to disturb the baboons with her body) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> her body (style, gender, smell, look, anime, etc.) made her enter into ="trms">relationships with the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals in a new mode, ='strcls'>**as a living person (like them) she creates with them an ="trms">embodied proximity='strcls'>** (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">embodied af="trms">finities) ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="frds scrmbld">Jassem is very good at it. this happens as well in ="nms">apass research environment between artists='lgc'>]
  ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="nms">Cinderella taking shower with her ="trms">birds in the attic ='lgc'>{urine, noise, surprise='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•Mark Bekoff ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> empathy='lgc'>: possibility of sharing feelings involves mirror ="trms">neurons (“I can feel the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals”) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= (an experiment to incorporate) ='strcls'>*to ="trms">embody ="trms">literally='strcls'>*
='lgc'>+ (Burghardt's) use of ='strcls'>*critical ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= Walt Disney) use of various forms of information (="trms">natural ="trms">history, perception, behavioral description, autism, ="nms">Cinderella, etc.)
="lsts lst1">•Temple Grandin (expert in factory plants for s="trms">laughter ="trms">systems) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*empathy without pathos='strcls'>* (for her and the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">world='lgc'>: a swirling mass of tiny details ='lgc'>~ ='lgc'>[='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal='lgc'>: autistic savant ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= special form of genius='lgc'>]='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a little plastic water bottle lying harmlessly, a shiny reflection, a yellow jacket hanging on a fence, all those turn out to be in their ="trms">world ='strcls'>*wrong details='strcls'>* (“I think the way ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals think”) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>****='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals are visual thinkers='strcls'>**** ='lgc'>{='strcls'>*you have to see in details='strcls'>*_ ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- how ='mywrk'>my work changed visually from abstract to baroque while working on the ="trms">heritage of ="trms">zoology. ='at'>#="nms">Cinderella='lgc'>: which part of me ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals give new powers and meanings='qstn'>? that part is of other beings='lgc'>}
="prgrph">-='lgc'>{Grandin actively transforms mindless ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals into meaningful geniuses ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> gives them new powers ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> changes her='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals (or your ghosts, your subjects) are invited to other modes of being, other ="trms">relationships, new ways to inhabit the human ="trms">world ='lgc'>+ to force human beings to address them ="trms">differently ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>**disclosing unexpected af="trms">finities ='lgc'>==create='lgc'>='lgc'>==> new identities='strcls'>** (='lgc'>=/= empathy='lgc'>: tourism of the soul) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> identities do not pre-exist identification ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*****previous construction of af="trms">finities ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> identity (is the outcome, the achievement)='strcls'>*****
(Grandin='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*marginal essence ='lgc'>--transform='lgc'>='lgc'>--> partial perspective ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> af="trms">finities='lgc'>: (="ppl">="ppl">Haraway's) just-barely-connections='strcls'>*

='lgc'>}='lgc'>=/= romanticism='lgc'>: the belief that “feeling for another” belongs to some ="trms">sort of naive state of ="trms">nature


(='at'>#feedback='lgc'>: ways of showing the artists how they actively create the perspective that allows them to “see” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘giving artistic feedback='lgc'> = being an ="trms">anthropologist on Mars’)

="ppl">="ppl">Despret anticipate finding some references to the body (beyond simple “="trms">presence”) in the work of ="trms">scientists ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">question of meaning ='lgc'>+ (its corollary) the ="trms">question of perspective

tick's perception='lgc'> = ="trms">world
(we know from Uexküll) one may indeed construct a perspective without involving the body - the perspective may be drawn partially from a mental process
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals only perceive things that have meaning for them='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals construe meanings in acting='strcls'>*
Umwelt theory='lgc'>: a ="trms">scientist may make an inventory of what makes the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal act and react ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> collecting ‘meanings’ the ="trms">scientist rebuilds the ="trms">world as each ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal perceives it ='lgc'>+ seeks for which meaning all these things take for it (='lgc'>=/= adopt the perspective of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal)

the ="trms">scientist aims not just to understand what something merely ‘means’ for another being, but also how something ‘="trms">matters’ for it (='lgc'>~ the most meaningful)

="trms">language of perspective ='lgc'>--="ppl">Daston='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what does it mean to understand other minds
='strcls'>*="trms">sympathetic projection='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**perspective='lgc'>: apotheosis of subjectivity as the essence of mind='lgc'>] ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- a cultural shift='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•habit of ="trms">interior observation cultivated by certain forms of piety
="lsts lst1">•increasingly refined ="trms">language of individual subjectivity (developed in the 18th and 19th century novel)
="lsts lst1">•equation drawn between ‘sensory experience='lgc'> = self’ by sensationa="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list psychology
="lsts lst1">•economic (and political) individualism
="lsts lst1">•cult of ="trms">sympathy

perspective ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ="trms">sympathy (with ="trms">science ='lgc'>+ ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an inappropriate form of subjectivity
="lstsrd">1. adopting ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal's perspective involves a d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous flirtation with ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism='lgc'>: one putting himself in the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal's shoe ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? one actually put the ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal in human shoes
="lstsrd">2. perspective ='lgc'>==imperil='lgc'>='lgc'>==> necessary distance (or ‘sanitary cordon’ between the observer and the observed)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">science
="lsts lst1">•anecdote ='lgc'>=/= legitimate date
="lsts lst1">•nonhuman ='lgc'>=/= beliefs (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> you can't attribute belief to ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals)


(old dualism of) “="trms">Science ='lgc'>=/= non-="trms">science” ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= “="trms">imaginative (autobiographical, emotional) ='lgc'>=/= factual (neutral)” ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= “body ='lgc'>=/= mind”

(reconstruction of)
what is most meaningful for ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal
what is the perspective of ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animal

='strcls'>*most meaningful='lgc'>: ="trms">affected perspective='strcls'>* (="ppl">="ppl">Despret) ='lgc'>=/= (Uexküll) ="trms">semiological perspective (of the tick)

(looking for or) focus on ="trms">affected perspective ='lgc'>==="ppl">="ppl">Despret='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (reveals) ="trms">scientists’ bodies in their practice ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what having a body means (for ="trms">scientists)
='lgc'>+
(="ppl">="ppl">Haraway ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>) ='strcls'>*bodies are “made” by ="trms">scientific practices ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ='thdf'>that is why the ="trms">question of ="trms">science is important for whoever dealing or working with the body='lgc'>]
='lgc'>+
(="ppl">Annemarie ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>) bobies (that are made) are enacted multiples (in medical practice)
='lgc'>+
(="ppl">="ppl">Despret ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) how bodies are undoing and redoing themselves through ="trms">different ="trms">scientific practices with ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals='qstn'>?='lgc'> = ='strcls'>*how are bodies growing multiples in diverse practices='qstn'>?='strcls'>* ='lgc'>+ (its corollary) ='strcls'>*how do each of these practices (='lgc'>+ ='trgt hghlght 1'href='?q=animal'>animals they are addressing) enact each of these bodies='qstn'>?='strcls'>*


="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%"> [...]