[...]s, etc.='lgc'>] that i am talking about is not about this ="trms">transferencial energy directed towards the sujet ="trms">supposé savoir. this practice of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading is about to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read together and to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read ourselves ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, to an atentiveness to the way we are ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading or not-="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading or aberating from something and be attentive to that disjunctive movement. what is noncomprehension='qstn'>? what is the experience of nonunderstanding='qstn'>? and so on.
='strcls'>*so, the sujet ="trms">supposé savoir is the one who is structurally is in a place of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge which doesn't mean that subject is filled with or capable of offering power and knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge but that is projected ="trms">onto that functional space='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sujet ="trms">supposé savoir is merely a spatial determination='qstn'>? (is this related to my ="trms">interventive ="trms">lectures in outdoor spaces in order to sabotage ‘what is meant to signify’ of the spatial subject-="trms">supposed-to-know='qstn'>?)
='strcls'>*sss is one of the effects of subjectivity ='lgc'>-- a scenography of ="trms">transferential intensity ='lgc'>: we credit that being with having knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge to transmit, and then we might also resist it.
='lgc'>='lgc'>---let's get out of this space!!='qstn'>?
='lgc'>--='prcnt'>%='lgc'>--in the context of pedagogy, students regards their teachers as sujet ="trms">supposé savoir, that they should know something. “it is the students’ ="trms">supposition of an art teacher who knows, who have something more than they have in themselves, that initiates the teaching and learning process rather than the art knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge actually possessed by the teacher” (Hetrick). (is it the architectural ="trms">gesture='lgc'>--the center='lgc'>--that produces the recognition of the teacher ="trms">situated as “teacher”='qstn'>?) ='strcls'>*“the spell of ="trms">transference.” / at some point some ="trms">gesture is taken by the student as a sign of hidden knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge and intention ='lgc'>==> ="trms">transference establishing itself; (how education ='lgc'>[and ="trms">love='qstn'>?='lgc'>] without ="trms">transference looks like='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Julia ="ppl">Scher, ‘post-="ppl">Lacanian’ means that you don't ‘transfer’ to the art-work nor artist='qstn'>?) ='at'>#="nms">harem
parent ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> teacher ='lgc'>}='lgc'>==> what the student may desire to become (be recognized as)

="trms">according to ="ppl">Lacan there is no ="nms">Pir (='lgc'>~ ='lgc'>[often iconoclast='lgc'>] leader, guide, mentor, expert, knowing-hero, enlightener, rescuer knowing more, knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edgeable pedagogue/leader “helping students find themselves,” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> my failed ="trms">transference with ="frds scrmbld">Saeed='lgc'>])

='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? Discourse of the University='strcls'>* ='lgc'>: (="trms">systematic) “knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge” replaces the nonsensical master signifier in the dominant commanding ="trms">position; in this case the sujet ="trms">supposé savoir dependent upon the related knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of the Other, or the source of “the field” (journals, text="trms">books, etc.) ='lgc'>==> (arbiter of) truth ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*to transmit knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge that is al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready given='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[account of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge as a ="trms">symbolic and ="trms">social ="trms">network, master signifier, subject ="trms">positions,='lgc'>]

in placing the ‘text’ in the ="trms">position of a knowing expert who has the answers ="frds scrmbld">Lili (unconsciously) idealizes her texts, and of course when her ‘texts’ fail to satisfy that desire she ="trms">demands ‘knowing’ from them in terms of cynicism='lgc'>: the feeling or state of being annoyed and irritated by them. this is a structural space of ‘="trms">demand’ in her. for me what is at stake is the complex ="trms">nature of encounter between ="frds scrmbld">Lili and text which takes place in an artificial space='lgc'>--a ="trms">symbolic space='lgc'>--that is at the same time the place of real investments of her desires.

="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Lili; is she (like the rest of us humans) looking for an active, predatory art='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> if non-="trms">communicative non-predatory non-kinetic ='lgc'>[a common issue with the students of choreography and dance in general='lgc'>] art exists on this planet, then we kave to learn “a whole new set of ="trms">techniques.” ='lgc'>[="ppl">La Guin='lgc'>])
='lgc'>--the meter of ‘time,’ that essential element, matrix and ="trms">measure of all kown human-="trms">animal art. what if there are other metric ="trms">systems='qstn'>? art not as an action, but a reaction='qstn'>? not a ="trms">communication, but a reception='qstn'>? ='lgc'>{='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to my master studies Diploma on passivity in performance art='lgc'>}

registers of ‘="trms">complaining’ in ="frds scrmbld">Lili's discourse. she is a bit like Faust groaning, habe nun akhhhhh Philosophie and so on. ='lgc'>[Ach of Sprache='lgc'>] (that they have done all the work, they know everything, yet know not enough of what really counts ='lgc'>[that is the incalculable='lgc'>] and cannot be satisfied by mere knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge available to them. nor can they keep themselves to the restricted zone of knowability.) so ="frds scrmbld">Lili saying “it's too much!” is a hysteric wish for ‘more’='qstn'>?
(="ppl">Freudian ="trms">joke, the hysteric says='lgc'>: “is that all there is!='qstn'>?” while the ="trms">neurotic says='lgc'>: “this is too much!” to the same object)

='strcls'>*it was ="ppl">Goethe who invented the super-ego, ="ppl">Freud named it following him.

the all-or-nothing view='lgc'>: i know everything or i don't know anything, problem of scale, problem of ‘circumstance='lgc'> = reality’
kloAQsvRkFY

the figure of the ‘accuser’ and the ‘straight talk’ for ="frds scrmbld">Lili
...that people would speak ="trms">literally
going from proof to proof, from necessity to necessity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> displacement (='lgc'>=/= detour)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Ekaterina; some other characters='lgc'>:
the jealous, the impassioned, the persecutive, the ="trms">erotomaniacal,
="trms">complainer,
noble trader,

="frds scrmbld">Ekaterina, asking for a ="trms">fabulation='qstn'>? her totem making
="ppl">Deleuzian ="trms">fabulation='lgc'>: a ="trms">fiction made up by people in their process of becoming
making up ="trms">stories
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">fiction (on its own; it doesn't have that ="trms">relation with becoming)

in which conditions the ="trms">paranoid mother occupies the failiour of the good-enough mother='qstn'>?
what constitutes the ‘site’ for her mother='qstn'>?

(how her) characters keep running into eachother in a universe of recursive connection (='qstn'>?)



='strcls'>**="trms">stories that collect ="trms">stories='strcls'>** ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= archive='qstn'>? my hypertext='qstn'>? a mouth full='qstn'>? ='lgc'>--this ="trms">specific type of ="trms">stories are d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerously ="trms">worlders, usually handed to the un="trms">questioned mechanics of universalized taxonomy and 17th century ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs='lgc'>: encyclopedic homogeneous tables. they are the stuff of ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>]
(mispronounced by ="frds scrmbld">Ekaterina > captured by ="frds scrmbld">Hoda > found object by ="frds">Sina)

="trms">stories that collect other ="trms">stories='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1- archive ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">sortability
="lstsrd">2- ="trms">translation ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>-->  linearity
='lgc'>==> universality (that both these ="trms">stories claim)
(='mywrk'>my work on hypertext ="nms">apass ="nms">ajayeb graph ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs, is to deal within these conditions of ="trms">storying. my shift of ="trms">interest)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg10" stl="font-size:113%"> (“dealing” ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luiza='lgc'>:)
(or in ="frds scrmbld">Lili's term “..a way to tackle issues”)

="large lg1" stl="font-size:124%"> ='lgc'>[with ="ppl">Avital='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*modalities of dealing-with='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-parasitism
="prgrph">-(under the spell) ="trms">drugs ='lgc'>=/= struggle (="trms">according to ="ppl">Marxian protocol='lgc'>: one is ="trms">drugged and disabled ='lgc'>[Date-rape-="trms">drug as an incapa="trms">citating ="trms">agent='lgc'>] and neutralized by state ="trms">apparatus, ="trms">drugs are administrated and spend in all ="trms">sorts of insidious ways.)
on the discourse of stupidity='lgc'>: ="ppl">Marx (in ="trms">writing to Engels says that he) believed that proletariat are stupid. ="ppl">Marx's insight to replace the other ="trms">drugs that have put so many into a stupor. people with ="trms">Religion are not around, they are praying somewhere to some ="trms">hallucination ='lgc'>[this is ="ppl">Marx, ="ppl">Freud, ="ppl">Nietzsche, and others in 20th century='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ideological stuporous ="trms">drugs, ‘everyone is stoned on something’ ='lgc'>=/= alert and lucid. ='lgc'>[highly problematic!='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-this is about a body recognizing its ‘enemy’ (the figure of enemy for every and each of us and the way we “recognize” it, as ="trms">historical bodies and minds in="trms">heriting the boys of 20th century.) ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>---- the state of the struggle depends on certain ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorologies on ‘clean’ that are problematic and phantasmatic and on the loose. ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[the issue is that there is no “clean body”.='lgc'>] how to do dirty work='qstn'>? (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for ‘morality’ and ‘clean’ go to ="ppl">Freud on the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin on morality='lgc'>: morality began as we stopped sniffing our asses and stood erect, nose in the air, away from the dirt ='lgc'>[that we are='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> morality's phobic appropriations and designations, ='lgc'>[="ppl">Lacan='lgc'>: from the genital order to the ="trms">sublime; az kun be fayakon از کون به فیکون ='prcnt'>%='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'>#ouroboros ='at'>#serpent='lgc'>], ='lgc'>[so when we stood up, stood erect, our genitals became center, exposing ourselves to the other, sexually centered exposure='lgc'>], ='lgc'>[='lgc'>], ='lgc'>[='lgc'>],)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Marxian='lgc'>: ="trms">language/tool/art as a virus that infiltrates ideological structures
="prgrph">-="ppl">Lacoue-Labarthe='lgc'>: in 20th century there are three fundamental modalities of “dealing-with,” three modes of relatedness to our concerns, our ="trms">anxieties, our worries, our work, our projects ='lgc'>[three major motifs for the thinkers that continue to provoke our thoughts='lgc'>]='lgc'>: (1) ='strcls'>*struggle='strcls'>* that would be the ="ppl">Marxian motor, the modality in terms of concern for ="trms">social justice. ='lgc'>[="ppl">Delanda on ="ppl">Marx ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a model of synthesis='lgc'>: a conflict of op="trms">posites='lgc'>] (2) ='strcls'>*="trms">mission='strcls'>* as introduced and lunched by ="ppl">Heidegger, who was on a ="trms">mission='lgc'>: we have a ="trms">mission, we have a ="trms">mission of trans="trms">mission, we have a ="trms">mission to inscribe things='lgc'>--not from God but from what has happened to us and been left to us after the death of God (as ="ppl">Nietzsche has announced.) ='lgc'>{yes, without a proper address, a state of ="trms">epistemic alert, and so on='lgc'>} and (3) ='strcls'>*task='strcls'>* as="trms">sociated with ="ppl">Benjamin. the Aufgabe is that which inscribes in itself ‘giving up,’ the Aufgabe, it means it is impossible, we take it on as a kind of ethical, political ="trms">obligation, but in the word Aufgabe is also ‘Gabe’ meaning ‘gift’ in German, it is gift and giving-up. ='lgc'>[="ppl">Derrida beautifully asks to negotiate endlessly with the ‘given,’ even if the Gift that is given is poisonous.='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ we can see how operate but also how they contaminate (and leak into each other.) we might have a sense of three of them='lgc'>}
="prgrph">-="trms">ontology of “struggling” a way out of Aporia ='lgc'>[denotes, in philosophy, a philosophical puzzle or state of puzzlement='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we can't! ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we must try to work to locate modalities of ="trms">stagnancy (rokud) without necessarily seeing the Exit. how do we live with these catastrophic markers that mark us='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-Paleonymics='lgc'>: a certain operation ="trms">according to which one continues to put old words to work. The use of a pre-existing word in a new context. ='lgc'>-- we are stuck with old pomping meanings.
='lgc'>--(="ppl">="ppl">Stengers) connecting ="trms">materialism with struggle ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (in ="nms">apass) we are descendants of this ="trms">trope

for ="frds scrmbld">Luiza, the meaning of ‘in="trms">fold’='qstn'>? instead of ‘unravel’='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">interface='strcls'>*
(i want to point out the ‘synthesis’ in her work rather than the ‘analysis’ implied in the term ‘unravel’)



="ppl">Lacoue-Labarthe made ="ppl">Heidegger possible to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read for ="ppl">Avital
(and that is what ="ppl">Avital does, make a lot of things possible to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read for me)

(to incorporate a) ='strcls'>*="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous hesitation='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo's “slowness”)
going step by step in the confrontation (essential to the un="trms">folding of thought)
='strcls'>**not turning ‘weakness’ (or ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorical weariness) into a (compelling) paraconcept ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="ppl">Levinas does it='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-taking on the the big topoi of the day like a warrior
courage ='lgc'>--comes='lgc'>='lgc'>--> from the ='strcls'>*="trms">abyss of needling fearfulness='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*German romantics invented the always-with-="trms">community, a living-with, a Mitsein practice of living life philosophically (full of moments of restricted solitude, pressure zones, etc.)
(office of friendship...) i am friend in a ="ppl">Freudian ambivalence, that means i undermine the friend, try to ="trms">trap him and catch him off guard
="prgrph">-if you are so calm, then i will try to bring you over to my side of the barricade of obsessional ="trms">neurotic (a condition in which the mind is intruded upon against her will by images, ideas, or words. consciousness remains lucid and power to reason remains intact ='lgc'>==> temporarily deprivation of individual of freedom of thought and action ='lgc'>[='lgc'><== ="trms">intrapsychic conflict of sexual o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin that mobilizes and blocks all flows of energy (in the case ="trms">neurotic a source of pleasure to the ="trms">child ='lgc'>=/= hysteric)='lgc'>])
="prgrph">-when we ="trms">write do we need to de="trms">monstrate a far-ranging grasp of the political consequences of every possible ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical move='qstn'>?
...prime mover or suspects such as ="ppl">Plato, ="ppl">Heidegger, ="ppl">Derrida
='strcls'>*acceleration='lgc'>: that we are result-oriented, business-oriented, under the gun of gains, and subject to the push towards ="trms">scientific objectification ='lgc'>=/= i try to work with ="trms">different degrees of attention='lgc'>: slowing down for checkpoints, allusive ="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusters and ="trms">dense indicators, that are also problematic and short-circuited (in my ="trms">lectures) ='lgc'>==> to get to the ='strcls'>*notational space='strcls'>* that we can calmly observe, examine and explore together.
="prgrph">-to be lucid about your own part taking in ="trms">narcissistic economy
='strcls'>*="trms">mimesis='strcls'>*='lgc'>: those things we are still stuck in in very covert and unavowed ways ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> ‘destiny’ (a term i use when i mean ="trms">mimesis for us ='lgc'>[-a disease that shows ="trms">symptoms characteristic of another disease='lgc'>])
(i am not pessimistic at all) i have just a catastrophic intuition that informs my grammar ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">mimetic hell

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='strcls'>*="trms">complaint (blocks ‘becoming’='qstn'>?)
="prgrph">-so if i am used to ="trms">complaint in all ="trms">sorts and forms and shapes, what do i do if not ="trms">complaining='qstn'>? that means i need to start learning new ="trms">techniques of being in the ="trms">world.
="prgrph">-="trms">complain, forms of protest, grievance, ='lgc'><='lgc'>--(contamination)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> lament (sug سوگ, zaje ضجه)
="prgrph">-dis="trms">positions of Beschwerde
="prgrph">-which minorities are as="trms">sociated with bitching and moaning='qstn'>? (naleh va shekayat ناله و شکایت, ghor غرولند, غر) (a feminine accent='qstn'>?!)
 ="prgrph prgrph2">-it is often said that “="trms">children should stop ="trms">complaining”
“stop ="trms">complaining” ='qstn'>?!! ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~> pointed to or relevant for ="frds scrmbld">Lili also='lgc'>]
='strcls'>***="trms">complaint ='lgc'>: the disenfranchised (az hagh mahrum shodeh از حق محروم شده) ="trms">language of muted rage='strcls'>***
what is (let's) bitching together='qstn'>?
is ="trms">religion one long ="trms">complaint='qstn'>? (='lgc'>--'reformation’ as a cover-up)
the “i prefer,” non-need, non-preference
='strcls'>*forms of relatedness='lgc'>--in certain ="trms">societies the opening self of ="trms">sociality consists in ="trms">complaining. (starter-utterances; ="trms">social encounter involves nagging about your friends, parents, ="trms">lovers, etc.) ='lgc'>--making friends is via ="trms">complaining. (this is about the conditions of Mitsein, being-with) ='lgc'>{non-affirmation ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/=='qstn'>? ="trms">complaint; we mistake so easily non-affirmation with ="trms">complaining. (is this ="frds scrmbld">Lili's take='qstn'>? her ="trms">complaints about the insufficiencies of being.)='lgc'>} ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> is ="trms">complaint parasitized by calls for retribution='qstn'>?
Klage (="trms">complaint) ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Anklage (accusation)
='strcls'>*="trms">complaint remains a repetitive fixation that feeds rather than exhausting its course (/="ppl">Avital, aw9Cv_wQ4CQ) ='lgc'>-- it does not finish itself off, or move up the ladder of transformation ='lgc'>[important for ="frds scrmbld">Sana='lgc'>], actually increases pain ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> so, (="trms">according to the analyst='lgc'>:) ="trms">complain is jacking up one's suffering (the Analytiker can't take it anymore)
="ppl">Avital > ="ppl">Kittler='lgc'>: the Ach of Sprache, (in our ="trms">historical ="trms">language usage='lgc'>:) ="trms">literature or ="trms">language as ="trms">complaint. sigh in ="trms">literature (also pointed out by ="frds scrmbld">Lili)
='lgc'>--the ="trms">modern techo-="trms">monster Faust opens with the ="trms">complain
='strcls'>**what is then a proper address='qstn'>?
...the wish for more

="prgrph">-do machines ="trms">complaint or lament='qstn'>?

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luiza; (one of sub-="trms">phenomenon of utterance) ='strcls'>*blush='strcls'>* registers a ="trms">complaint(='qstn'>?)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to be noted that certain white skin-colors considered racistly “capable” of displaying moral ="trms">anxiety.)
="prgrph">-a level of ="trms">affect and meaning that remains at the loss of words, between shame and ex="trms">citement, confession and disavow. blush speaks for her at moment when she cannot stand up for herself='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-or it betrays her with a sudden sp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read of skin-mapping releasing a secret or indexing a moral blemish (lakedar لکه دار), a pigmentation... (how to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read it='qstn'>?)
="prgrph">-blush manages to register a ="trms">complaint and it signs off ='lgc'>[con="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes='lgc'>] at an unspoken accusation...
="prgrph">-blossoming of senses, cultural significance, who is capable of blushing='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (decency's) ='strcls'>*outrage='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> libidinally charged, prompting a political arousal ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> still a vitality stirs in the ="trms">complaint='lgc'>--='strcls'>*the ="trms">complaint can bring movement='strcls'>*) ='lgc'>[="frds scrmbld">Luiza's climate of resistance and her ="trms">integrated modality of ‘struggle'='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**inner life of morality='strcls'>**
="prgrph">-flush='qstn'>?

="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%"> ='lgc'>[="trms">complaint,='lgc'>] is it issued from a place of impotence or does it have the potential to move mountains='qstn'>? (="ppl">Avital='lgc'>--="frds">Sina's emergency supply of meaning)
can it arrive at any destination whatsoever='qstn'>?
‘="trms">complain’ and ‘explain’ ="trms">relationships
(="trms">laughter as a form of ="trms">complaining)
‘="trms">complain’ and ‘politeness’ ="trms">relationships
what ="trms">complaint has to do with our ="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger-management programs='qstn'>?

="trms">complaint ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/= lament (="trms">complaint won't shut up but lament desires its ending)
lament is fined to mourning and loss ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/= ="trms">complaint (resisting a fixed ="trms">relation to loss) seems unable to mourn
='strcls'>*="trms">complaint cannot mourn. ='lgc'>[="trms">complaint as a form of mourning-disorder='lgc'>]
(is mourning busy with ‘continuity in life’='qstn'>? a ="trms">world that is not made of connections='lgc'>: zendegi bi/ba tadavom زندگی‌ بی/با تداوم, jahani ke be ham mortabet nist جهانی‌ که به هم مرتبط نیست)

is any critique not a ="trms">complaint='qstn'>? not throwing something in the field of ="trms">complaint='qstn'>? (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Luiza, ="frds scrmbld">Lili; certain forms of protest dominates their utterances)
='lgc'>--="trms">different ="trms">morphs of civic grief='lgc'>--
(why am i concerned with ="trms">complaint of my friends='qstn'>? this is about checking my own infrastructural concerns about zones of encounter and redirecting oversized libidinal aggressions, ='lgc'>[and pain-relief='qstn'>? ='lgc'>{is ='mywrk'>my work all about (philosophical/artistic) pain-relief='qstn'>?='lgc'>}='lgc'>])

="trms">complaint ='lgc'>=/= staying within the boundaries of ="trms">coded gracefulness
(...credit reserved for non-="trms">complainers) ,,, ((minor scales of)) protest and breaking rhymes (of master discourse='qstn'>?) (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sana, perturbed by manners of injustice; her libido ='lgc'>[zist-maye زیست مایه, shur-e hayat شور حیات='lgc'>] is at stake)
='lgc'>--when ="trms">complaint takes over and you don't even know if there is an injury anymore at the root of it.[...]