[...]c space='lgc'>--that is at the same time the place of real investments of her desires.

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Lili; is she (like the rest of us humans) looking for an active, predatory art='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> if non-="trms">communicative non-predatory non-kinetic ='lgc'>[a common issue with the students of choreography and dance in general='lgc'>] art exists on this planet, then we kave to learn “a whole new set of ="trms">techniques.” ='lgc'>[="ppl">La Guin='lgc'>])
='lgc'>--the meter of ‘time,’ that essential element, matrix and ="trms">measure of all kown human-="trms">animal art. what if there are other metric ="trms">systems='qstn'>? art not as an action, but a reaction='qstn'>? not a ="trms">communication, but a reception='qstn'>? ='lgc'>{='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to my master studies Diploma on passivity in performance art='lgc'>}

registers of ‘="trms">complaining’ in ="frds scrmbld">Lili's discourse. she is a bit like Faust groaning, habe nun akhhhhh Philosophie and so on. ='lgc'>[Ach of Sprache='lgc'>] (that they have done all the work, they know everything, yet know not enough of what really counts ='lgc'>[that is the incalculable='lgc'>] and cannot be satisfied by mere knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge available to them. nor can they keep themselves to the restricted zone of knowability.) so ="frds scrmbld">Lili saying “it's too much!” is a hysteric wish for ‘more’='qstn'>?
(="ppl">Freudian ="trms">joke, the hysteric says='lgc'>: “is that all there is!='qstn'>?” while the ="trms">neurotic says='lgc'>: “this is too much!” to the same object)

='strcls'>*it was ="ppl">Goethe who invented the super-ego, ="ppl">Freud named it following him.

the all-or-nothing view='lgc'>: i know everything or i don't know anything, problem of scale, problem of ‘circumstance='lgc'> = reality’
kloAQsvRkFY

the figure of the ‘accuser’ and the ‘straight talk’ for ="frds scrmbld">Lili
...that people would speak ="trms">literally
going from proof to proof, from necessity to necessity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> displacement (='lgc'>=/= detour)

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg1" stl="font-size:142%">
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Ekaterina; some other characters='lgc'>:
the jealous, the impassioned, the persecutive, the ="trms">erotomaniacal,
="trms">complainer,
noble trader,

="frds scrmbld">Ekaterina, asking for a ="trms">fabulation='qstn'>? her totem making
="ppl">Deleuzian ="trms">fabulation='lgc'>: a ="trms">fiction made up by people in their process of becoming
making up ="trms">stories
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">fiction (on its own; it doesn't have that ="trms">relation with becoming)

in which conditions the ="trms">paranoid mother occupies the failiour of the good-enough mother='qstn'>?
what constitutes the ‘site’ for her mother='qstn'>?

(how her) characters keep running into eachother in a universe of recursive connection (='qstn'>?)



='strcls'>**="trms">stories that collect ="trms">stories='strcls'>** ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~= archive='qstn'>? my hypertext='qstn'>? a mouth full='qstn'>? ='lgc'>--this ="trms">specific type of ="trms">stories are d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerously ="trms">worlders, usually handed to the un="trms">questioned mechanics of universalized taxonomy and 17th century ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs='lgc'>: encyclopedic homogeneous tables. they are the stuff of ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>]
(mispronounced by ="frds scrmbld">Ekaterina > captured by ="frds scrmbld">Hoda > found object by ="frds">Sina)

="trms">stories that collect other ="trms">stories='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1- archive ='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">sortability
="lstsrd">2- ="trms">translation ='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>-->  linearity
='lgc'>==> universality (that both these ="trms">stories claim)
(='mywrk'>my work on hypertext ="nms">apass ="nms">ajayeb graph ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs, is to deal within these conditions of ="trms">storying. my shift of ="trms">interest)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(“dealing” ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luiza='lgc'>:)
(or in ="frds scrmbld">Lili's term “..a way to tackle issues”)

='lgc'>[with ="ppl">Avital='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*modalities of dealing-with='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-parasitism
="prgrph">-(under the spell) ="trms">drugs ='lgc'>=/= struggle (="trms">according to ="ppl">Marxian protocol='lgc'>: one is ="trms">drugged and disabled ='lgc'>[Date-rape-="trms">drug as an incapa="trms">citating ="trms">agent='lgc'>] and neutralized by state ="trms">apparatus, ="trms">drugs are administrated and spend in all ="trms">sorts of insidious ways.)
on the discourse of stupidity='lgc'>: ="ppl">Marx (in ="trms">writing to Engels says that he) believed that proletariat are stupid. ="ppl">Marx's insight to replace the other ="trms">drugs that have put so many into a stupor. people with ="trms">Religion are not around, they are praying somewhere to some ="trms">hallucination ='lgc'>[this is ="ppl">Marx, ="ppl">Freud, ="ppl">Nietzsche, and others in 20th century='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ideological stuporous ="trms">drugs, ‘everyone is stoned on something’ ='lgc'>=/= alert and lucid. ='lgc'>[highly problematic!='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-this is about a body recognizing its ‘enemy’ (the figure of enemy for every and each of us and the way we “recognize” it, as ="trms">historical bodies and minds in="trms">heriting the boys of 20th century.) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>-- the state of the struggle depends on certain ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorologies on ‘clean’ that are problematic and phantasmatic and on the loose. ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[the issue is that there is no “clean body”.='lgc'>] how to do dirty work='qstn'>? (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for ‘morality’ and ‘clean’ go to ="ppl">Freud on the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin on morality='lgc'>: morality began as we stopped sniffing our asses and stood erect, nose in the air, away from the dirt ='lgc'>[that we are='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> morality's phobic appropriations and designations, ='lgc'>[="ppl">Lacan='lgc'>: from the genital order to the ="trms">sublime; az kun be fayakon از کون به فیکون ='prcnt'>%='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'>#ouroboros ='at'>#serpent='lgc'>], ='lgc'>[so when we stood up, stood erect, our genitals became center, exposing ourselves to the other, sexually centered exposure='lgc'>], ='lgc'>[='lgc'>], ='lgc'>[='lgc'>],)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Marxian='lgc'>: ="trms">language/tool/art as a virus that infiltrates ideological structures
="prgrph">-="ppl">Lacoue-Labarthe='lgc'>: in 20th century there are three fundamental modalities of “dealing-with,” three modes of relatedness to our concerns, our ="trms">anxieties, our worries, our work, our projects ='lgc'>[three major motifs for the thinkers that continue to provoke our thoughts='lgc'>]='lgc'>: (1) ='strcls'>*struggle='strcls'>* that would be the ="ppl">Marxian motor, the modality in terms of concern for ="trms">social justice. ='lgc'>[="ppl">Delanda on ="ppl">Marx ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a model of synthesis='lgc'>: a conflict of op="trms">posites='lgc'>] (2) ='strcls'>*="trms">mission='strcls'>* as introduced and lunched by ="ppl">Heidegger, who was on a ="trms">mission='lgc'>: we have a ="trms">mission, we have a ="trms">mission of trans="trms">mission, we have a ="trms">mission to inscribe things='lgc'>--not from God but from what has happened to us and been left to us after the death of God (as ="ppl">Nietzsche has announced.) ='lgc'>{yes, without a proper address, a state of ="trms">epistemic alert, and so on='lgc'>} and (3) ='strcls'>*task='strcls'>* as="trms">sociated with ="ppl">Benjamin. the Aufgabe is that which inscribes in itself ‘giving up,’ the Aufgabe, it means it is impossible, we take it on as a kind of ethical, political ="trms">obligation, but in the word Aufgabe is also ‘Gabe’ meaning ‘gift’ in German, it is gift and giving-up. ='lgc'>[="ppl">Derrida beautifully asks to negotiate endlessly with the ‘given,’ even if the Gift that is given is poisonous.='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ we can see how operate but also how they contaminate (and leak into each other.) we might have a sense of three of them='lgc'>}
="prgrph">-="trms">ontology of “struggling” a way out of Aporia ='lgc'>[denotes, in philosophy, a philosophical puzzle or state of puzzlement='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we can't! ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we must try to work to locate modalities of ="trms">stagnancy (rokud) without necessarily seeing the Exit. how do we live with these catastrophic markers that mark us='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-Paleonymics='lgc'>: a certain operation ="trms">according to which one continues to put old words to work. The use of a pre-existing word in a new context. ='lgc'>-- we are stuck with old pomping meanings.
='lgc'>--(="ppl">="ppl">Stengers) connecting ="trms">materialism with struggle ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (in ="nms">apass) we are descendants of this ="trms">trope

for ="frds scrmbld">Luiza, the meaning of ‘in="trms">fold’='qstn'>? instead of ‘unravel’='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">interface='strcls'>*
(i want to point out the ‘synthesis’ in her work rather than the ‘analysis’ implied in the term ‘unravel’)



="ppl">Lacoue-Labarthe made ="ppl">Heidegger possible to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read for ="ppl">Avital
(and that is what ="ppl">Avital does, make a lot of things possible to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read for me)

(to incorporate a) ='strcls'>*="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous hesitation='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo's “slowness”)
going step by step in the confrontation (essential to the un="trms">folding of thought)
='strcls'>**not turning ‘weakness’ (or ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorical weariness) into a (compelling) paraconcept ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="ppl">Levinas does it='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-taking on the the big topoi of the day like a warrior
courage ='lgc'>--comes='lgc'>='lgc'>--> from the ='strcls'>*="trms">abyss of needling fearfulness='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*German romantics invented the always-with-="trms">community, a living-with, a Mitsein practice of living life philosophically (full of moments of restricted solitude, pressure zones, etc.)
(office of friendship...) i am friend in a ="ppl">Freudian ambivalence, that means i undermine the friend, try to ="trms">trap him and catch him off guard
="prgrph">-if you are so calm, then i will try to bring you over to my side of the barricade of obsessional ="trms">neurotic (a condition in which the mind is intruded upon against her will by images, ideas, or words. consciousness remains lucid and power to reason remains intact ='lgc'>==> temporarily deprivation of individual of freedom of thought and action ='lgc'>[='lgc'><== ="trms">intrapsychic conflict of sexual o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin that mobilizes and blocks all flows of energy (in the case ="trms">neurotic a source of pleasure to the ="trms">child ='lgc'>=/= hysteric)='lgc'>])
="prgrph">-when we ="trms">write do we need to de="trms">monstrate a far-ranging grasp of the political consequences of every possible ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical move='qstn'>?
...prime mover or suspects such as ="ppl">Plato, ="ppl">Heidegger, ="ppl">Derrida
='strcls'>*acceleration='lgc'>: that we are result-oriented, business-oriented, under the gun of gains, and subject to the push towards ="trms">scientific objectification ='lgc'>=/= i try to work wit[...]