[...]ve ='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">sortability
="lstsrd">2- ="trms">translation ='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>-->  linearity
='lgc'>==> universality (that both these ="trms">stories claim)
(='mywrk'>my work on hypertext ="nms">apass ="nms">ajayeb graph ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs, is to deal within these conditions of ="trms">storying. my shift of ="trms">interest)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%"> (“dealing” ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luiza='lgc'>:)
(or in ="frds scrmbld">Lili's term “..a way to tackle issues”)

='lgc'>[with ="ppl">Avital='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*modalities of dealing-with='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-parasitism
="prgrph">-(under the spell) ="trms">drugs ='lgc'>=/= struggle (="trms">according to ="ppl">Marxian protocol='lgc'>: one is ="trms">drugged and disabled ='lgc'>[Date-rape-="trms">drug as an incapa="trms">citating ="trms">agent='lgc'>] and neutralized by state ="trms">apparatus, ="trms">drugs are administrated and spend in all ="trms">sorts of insidious ways.)
on the discourse of stupidity='lgc'>: ="ppl">Marx (in ="trms">writing to Engels says that he) believed that proletariat are stupid. ="ppl">Marx's insight to replace the other ="trms">drugs that have put so many into a stupor. people with ="trms">Religion are not around, they are praying somewhere to some ="trms">hallucination ='lgc'>[this is ="ppl">Marx, ="ppl">Freud, ="ppl">Nietzsche, and others in 20th century='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ideological stuporous ="trms">drugs, ‘everyone is stoned on something’ ='lgc'>=/= alert and lucid. ='lgc'>[highly problematic!='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-this is about a body recognizing its ‘enemy’ (the figure of enemy for every and each of us and the way we “recognize” it, as ="trms">historical bodies and minds in="trms">heriting the boys of 20th century.) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>-- the state of the struggle depends on certain ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorologies on ‘clean’ that are problematic and phantasmatic and on the loose. ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[the issue is that there is no “clean body”.='lgc'>] how to do dirty work='qstn'>? (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for ‘morality’ and ‘clean’ go to ="ppl">Freud on the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin on morality='lgc'>: morality began as we stopped sniffing our asses and stood erect, nose in the air, away from the dirt ='lgc'>[that we are='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> morality's phobic appropriations and designations, ='lgc'>[="ppl">Lacan='lgc'>: from the genital order to the ="trms">sublime; az kun be fayakon از کون به فیکون ='prcnt'>%='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'>#ouroboros ='at'>#serpent='lgc'>], ='lgc'>[so when we stood up, stood erect, our genitals became center, exposing ourselves to the other, sexually centered exposure='lgc'>], ='lgc'>[='lgc'>], ='lgc'>[='lgc'>],)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Marxian='lgc'>: ="trms">language/tool/art as a virus that infiltrates ideological structures
="prgrph">-="ppl">Lacoue-Labarthe='lgc'>: in 20th century there are three fundamental modalities of “dealing-with,” three modes of relatedness to our concerns, our ="trms">anxieties, our worries, our work, our projects ='lgc'>[three major motifs for the thinkers that continue to provoke our thoughts='lgc'>]='lgc'>: (1) ='strcls'>*struggle='strcls'>* that would be the ="ppl">Marxian motor, the modality in terms of concern for ="trms">social justice. ='lgc'>[="ppl">Delanda on ="ppl">Marx ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a model of synthesis='lgc'>: a conflict of op="trms">posites='lgc'>] (2) ='strcls'>*="trms">mission='strcls'>* as introduced and lunched by ="ppl">Heidegger, who was on a ="trms">mission='lgc'>: we have a ="trms">mission, we have a ="trms">mission of trans="trms">mission, we have a ="trms">mission to inscribe things='lgc'>--not from God but from what has happened to us and been left to us after the death of God (as ="ppl">Nietzsche has announced.) ='lgc'>{yes, without a proper address, a state of ="trms">epistemic alert, and so on='lgc'>} and (3) ='strcls'>*task='strcls'>* as="trms">sociated with ="ppl">Benjamin. the Aufgabe is that which inscribes in itself ‘giving up,’ the Aufgabe, it means it is impossible, we take it on as a kind of ethical, political ="trms">obligation, but in the word Aufgabe is also ‘Gabe’ meaning ‘gift’ in German, it is gift and giving-up. ='lgc'>[="ppl">Derrida beautifully asks to negotiate endlessly with the ‘given,’ even if the Gift that is given is poisonous.='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ we can see how operate but also how they contaminate (and leak into each other.) we might have a sense of three of them='lgc'>}
="prgrph">-="trms">ontology of “struggling” a way out of Aporia ='lgc'>[denotes, in philosophy, a philosophical puzzle or state of puzzlement='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we can't! ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we must try to work to locate modalities of ="trms">stagnancy (rokud) without necessarily seeing the Exit. how do we live with these catastrophic markers that mark us='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-Paleonymics='lgc'>: a certain operation ="trms">according to which one continues to put old words to work. The use of a pre-existing word in a new context. ='lgc'>-- we are stuck with old pomping meanings.
='lgc'>--(="ppl">="ppl">Stengers) connecting ="trms">materialism with struggle ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (in ="nms">apass) we are descendants of this ="trms">trope

for ="frds scrmbld">Luiza, the meaning of ‘in="trms">fold’='qstn'>? instead of ‘unravel’='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">interface='strcls'>*
(i want to point out the ‘synthesis’ in her work rather than the ‘analysis’ implied in the term ‘unravel’)



="ppl">Lacoue-Labarthe made ="ppl">Heidegger possible to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read for ="ppl">Avital
(and that is what ="ppl">Avital does, make a lot of things possible to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read for me)

(to incorporate a) ='strcls'>*="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous hesitation='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo's “slowness”)
going step by step in the confrontation (essential to the un="trms">folding of thought)
='strcls'>**not turning ‘weakness’ (or ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorical weariness) into a (compelling) paraconcept ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="ppl">Levinas does it='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-taking on the the big topoi of the day like a warrior
courage ='lgc'>--comes='lgc'>='lgc'>--> from the ='strcls'>*="trms">abyss of needling fearfulness='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*German romantics invented the always-with-="trms">community, a living-with, a Mitsein practice of living life philosophically (full of moments of restricted solitude, pressure zones, etc.)
(office of friendship...) i am friend in a ="ppl">Freudian ambivalence, that means i undermine the friend, try to ="trms">trap him and catch him off guard
="prgrph">-if you are so calm, then i will try to bring you over to my side of the barricade of obsessional ="trms">neurotic (a condition in which the mind is intruded upon against her will by images, ideas, or words. consciousness remains lucid and power to reason remains intact ='lgc'>==> temporarily deprivation of individual of freedom of thought and action ='lgc'>[='lgc'><== ="trms">intrapsychic conflict of sexual o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin that mobilizes and blocks all flows of energy (in the case ="trms">neurotic a source of pleasure to the ="trms">child ='lgc'>=/= hysteric)='lgc'>])
="prgrph">-when we ="trms">write do we need to de="trms">monstrate a far-ranging grasp of the political consequences of every possible ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical move='qstn'>?
...prime mover or suspects such as ="ppl">Plato, ="ppl">Heidegger, ="ppl">Derrida
='strcls'>*acceleration='lgc'>: that we are result-oriented, business-oriented, under the gun of gains, and subject to the push towards ="trms">scientific objectification ='lgc'>=/= i try to work with ="trms">different degrees of attention='lgc'>: slowing down for checkpoints, allusive ="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusters and ="trms">dense indicators, that are also problematic and short-circuited (in my ="trms">lectures) ='lgc'>==> to get to the ='strcls'>*notational space='strcls'>* that we can calmly observe, examine and explore together.
="prgrph">-to be lucid about your own part taking in ="trms">narcissistic economy
='strcls'>*="trms">mimesis='strcls'>*='lgc'>: those things we are still stuck in in very covert and unavowed ways ='lgc'>~-> ‘destiny’ (a term i use when i mean ="trms">mimesis for us ='lgc'>[-a disease that shows ="trms">symptoms characteristic of another disease='lgc'>])
(i am not pessimistic at all) i have just a catastrophic intuition that informs my grammar ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">mimetic hell

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='strcls'>*="trms">complaint (blocks ‘becoming’='qstn'>?)
="prgrph">-so if i am used to ="trms">complaint in all ="trms">sorts and forms and shapes, what do i do if not ="trms">complaining='qstn'>? that means i need to start learning new ="trms">techniques of being in the ="trms">world.
="prgrph">-="trms">complain, forms of protest, grievance, ='lgc'><='lgc'>--(contamination)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> lament (sug سوگ, zaje ضجه)
="prgrph">-dis="trms">positions of Beschwerde
="prgrph">-which minorities are as="trms">sociated with bitching and moaning='qstn'>? (naleh va shekayat ناله و شکایت, ghor غرولند, غر) (a feminine accent='qstn'>?!)
 ="prgrph prgrph2">-it is often said that “="trms">children should stop ="trms">complaining”
“stop ="trms">complaining” ='qstn'>?!! ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~~> pointed to or relevant for ="frds scrmbld">Lili also='lgc'>]
='strcls'>***="trms">complaint ='lgc'>: the disenfranchised (az hagh mahrum shodeh از حق محروم شده) ="trms">language of muted rage='strcls'>***
what is (let's) bitching together='qstn'>?
is ="trms">religion one long ="trms">complaint='qstn'>? (='lgc'>--'reformation’ as a cover-up)
the “i prefer,” non-need, non-preference
='strcls'>*forms of relatedness='lgc'>--in certain ="trms">societies the opening self of ="trms">sociality consists in ="trms">complaining. (starter-utterances; ="trms">social encounter involves nagging about your friends, parents, ="trms">lovers, etc.) ='lgc'>--making friends is via ="trms">complaining. (this is about the conditions of Mitsein, being-with) ='lgc'>{non-affirmation ='lgc'>~/=='qstn'>? ="trms">complaint; we mistake so easily non-affirmation with ="trms">complaining. (is this ="frds scrmbld">Lili's take='qstn'>? her ="trms">complaints about the insufficiencies of being.)='lgc'>} ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> is ="trms">complaint parasitized by calls for retribution='qstn'>?
Klage (="trms">complaint) ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Anklage (accusation)
='strcls'>*="trms">complaint remains a repetitive fixation that feeds rather than exhausting its course (/="ppl">Avital, aw9Cv_wQ4CQ) ='lgc'>-- it does not finish itself off, or move up the ladder of transformation ='lgc'>[important for ="frds scrmbld">Sana='lgc'>], actually increases pain ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> so, (="trms">according to the analyst='lgc'>:) ="trms">complain is jacking up one's suffering (the Analytiker can't take it anymore)
="ppl">Avital > ="ppl">Kittler='lgc'>: the Ach of Sprache, (in our ="trms">historical ="trms">language usage='lgc'>:) ="trms">literature or ="trms">language as ="trms">complaint. sigh in ="trms">literature (also pointed out by ="frds scrmbld">Lili)
='lgc'>--the ="trms">modern techo-="trms">monster Faust opens with the ="trms">complain
='strcls'>**what is then a proper address='qstn'>?
...the wish for more

="prgrph">-do machines ="trms">complaint or lament='qstn'>?

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luiza; (one of sub-="trms">phenomeno[...]