[...]dog  /
outside the law of man, a devil /
outside the law of god, a...

The hypocrite pays in appearance

devil dubing/subtitling the ="trms">society of reasonable men
..mad dogs

law directs the circulation of goods. What does it mean for an object oriented thought='qstn'>?
Law directs the circulation of goods, women, promise; of re="trms">presentations, insults, ="trms">jests

i, as the text of sina, will show you that...

="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> An ordering ="trms">relation is irreflexive, anti="trms">symmetric, and ="trms">transitive

sequential to consequential
(the concern of ="trms">narrative)
order of reason (one order among many other sequences)
reason has immense consequences, so does ="trms">aesthetics

betterable better ='lgc'>: finding a stronger one='lgc'>='lgc'>---Kelileh Demneh
the case is of a maximum
the tree of the “better”
a whole forest hidden by a single tree
‘possibility’ is always the higher point on the tree

if you kill me now, my time freezes and its order disappears.
(said sheep to the wolf)
relative ="trms">relations and absolute limit; he is the master of future

where do you come from='qstn'>? ='lgc'>: this is of your clan ='lgc'>: irreversible genealogical tree ='lgc'>: complete model of kinship (for the ordered structure)

='thdf'>the idea of non-destruction is strange in ="trms">nature, as if there is a notion of construction in ="trms">nature, establishes a ="trms">responsibility.
Care, claims to have suffer

at the end; you are the cause, i am the effect.

Perfect, is free of the psychologism of hypocrisy
="lsts lst1">•hypocrisy comes from the word to judge

stable structures and dialectical processes are inseparable
(each choice as="trms">sociated with a location on the tree)

(best) reason always permits a winning game (='qstn'>?)

might into ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right and obedience into duty, that is transforming force into factual necessity, by the stronger. Obedience into law. This is ="ppl">Rousseau

means to have access to the inaccessible

the exact ="trms">sciences the optimal ="trms">relationship from subject to object, conceived since the classical ages

A slave who, while sleeping, dreams that he is free
(put to the order of slave, a slave ="trms">presenting a project to his master)

leipniz and ="ppl">Descartes, ="trms">posit a maximum and minimum strategy in an ordered space.

The universal quantifactor ='lgc'>: constant repetition of all, always, never, absolutely, etc. ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “i shall always follow this path.”

“perfect” signifies “optimal”

quantification of a ="trms">relationship followed to its limits.
The process quantified, the tactics maximised

(“result:” instead of “='lgc'>='lgc'>-->” (“arrows”) in my ="trms">writing='qstn'>? )

‘to know ="trms">nature is a game’
experiment is also a game='qstn'>?
With win or lose possibilities, in which there exists a guaranteed winning strategy.
Game is the model of all exact knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges.

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

The Ur-Supe, the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal state of life, the marine mixture, the primal liquid state, prebiotic soup, the physiochemical condition for the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of living beings

a mother emerges from a mother

the earth is in labor, a labor of ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphosis, transformation, production, generation

beneath the anecdotes and pathos, the text mobilizes with great precision certain findings of rational mechanics

(ice and fire) is only relatively cold

="trms">vocabulary ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? Model of precision

centers are breasts
periodic breasts

last ="trms">science transcends the first

reservoir exists for the circulation

two notions structurally stable in encyclopedia='lgc'>: circulation ='and'>& reservoir

elements ='lgc'>+ operation ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= structure

analysing a text in terms of encyclopedia, i need to answer two ="trms">questions='lgc'>: what is reservoir='qstn'>? What is circulation='qstn'>?

="trms">question regarding ="nms">iranian ="trms">literature reservoir='lgc'>: what is the reservoir='qstn'>? Where is the reservoir='qstn'>? What are its con="trms">figurations='qstn'>?
(the last ="trms">question syntactically proposes also the possibility of recon="trms">figuration)
Is it ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorical='qstn'>? Is it closed='qstn'>?
What is its plan='qstn'>? How it transports ="trms">according to this plan='qstn'>? What are the circulating elements='qstn'>? What is stable there='qstn'>? What are the transformations when it transports='qstn'>?

Reservoir is libidinal='strcls'>*
capital, quantity of energy, constancy of force,

what can be applied to the pattern of circulations='qstn'>?
(of ="trms">vocabulary, value, money, desire, etc.)
what blocks circulation='qstn'>? Who or what governs it='qstn'>?

In answering, you reconstruct (the entire set of what you consider ="trms">interpretive)

application='lgc'>: strategy of conformity
explication='lgc'>: archaic and vague approximation

it is not necessary to introduce ="trms">methods to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read a text='lgc'>: the ="trms">method is in the text. The text is its own criticism, its own explication, its own application.

Texts that operate='lgc'> = texts that are operated on ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> there are just texts
(there is no dichotomy in the operation)

="trms">technologies concerning heat, thermodynamics, shocked the traditional ="trms">world and shaped the one we are now working in.
...theories concerning processes of transformation.
...="trms">stages of alchemical initiations, archaic figure of fire,

How to make the ="trms">history of ="trms">science as effective as ="trms">science itself='qstn'>?

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

suddenly ="trms">science falls silent and mythology speaks

transsubstantiation

the astronomer falls in ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> the truth comes out
(ask maryam's astronomer='lgc'>: what disconnects the connected='qstn'>?)

throw the key to the text

for classification, connection is at stake, space is at stake

="large lg14" stl="font-size:111%"> the formal invariant is something like a transport

what is worse for classification='qstn'>?

non-connections that are at stake

we shall never be free of space

fire, and transcendental subject

accidents of space (at work upon the multiplicity of spatial varieties

what is the program of topology='qstn'>?

My body lives in as many spaces as the group (the ="trms">society) has formed.
The euclidian house, the street and its ="trms">networks, open/closed garden, closed space of the sacred, school and its fix points and ="trms">social varieties, complex ensemble of flow charts, those of ="trms">language, of factory of family, of political party, and so forth.

..my body is plunged in the ="trms">intersection of this multiplicity

culture ='lgc'>: constructing precise and particular connections between such spatial varieties ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal ="trms">intersection”

topology; culture connects and joints, art delinks and disconnects
(the law of incest prohibition connects the disconnected)

pure ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> untainted ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> separated, enclosed

the discourse of rationality replacing the mythical text ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> art becomes ="trms">science ='lgc'>='lgc'>--- the realization of a project is left to reason

siyavosh/sohrab is one of the descendants of disseminated spaces, of catastrophic separation of the continuous

when Rostam recognises the mark of his son, ="ppl">Ferdosi giving a version of recognition s="trms">cene, connects ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Oedipus
the son, the mother
="prgrph">-we can recognise a typological space='lgc'>: the same and the other='lgc'>: the separated
="prgrph">-the space of the ="trms">world is described requiring connection
="prgrph">-family tree
="prgrph">-parts are to be joined
="prgrph">-rostam and sohrab, siyavosh and sudabeh, cannot be ="trms">composed to form a single homogeneous space. (rostam and siyavosh do that)

the pre="trms">suppose that before discourse there existed a ="trms">mutual policy of unrelated spaces ='lgc'>~ chaos
="prgrph">-the object or the target of (cultural) discourse is to connect
="prgrph">-to transform a chaos of separate spatial varieties into a space of ="trms">communication
="prgrph">-scatered ="trms">members, re-="trms">membered
="prgrph">-incoherent chaos, re="trms">formulated in the common space of transport when it is reconstructed

Kelileh
...she is the signatory of the discourse
...she ="trms">mimes the progress and delays of Demneh

="nms">ajayeb, a time when transport and itinerary were only myth


transport ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/=='qstn'>? transfer
="prgrph">-transport is a unitary space where transfer is ='strcls'>*always possible (like money)
="prgrph">-transfer is only a possibility

so, we must find the word or construct a conditional logos that ='strcls'>*al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready works to connect the crevices which run across the spatial chaos of disconnect varieties, the ='strcls'>*proto-worker of space='strcls'>*, the weaver in the topology of nodes

separations by sudden stoppage
="lsts lst1">•is this a myth='qstn'>?

a worker of the single space
(we are not)

euclidian space of every possible displace
(what are the displaces and displacements in Ajayeb='qstn'>? Be ="trms">specific)

(proliferating multiplicities of) unlinked ="trms">morphologies

(fire text)
to practice dichotomy (and its connected paths) one must know that its clefts follow and overlap the ancient mythical ="trms">narrative (in which ="trms">worlds are torn ...)


when ="trms">geometry is born myth falls silent

(the ancient journey) from islands to catastrophes, from passage to fault, from bridge to well, from relay to labyrinth

the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal function

the “new space” is always universal

the space of reason is universal, within it there are no more encounters

one can walk on two or four or three legs ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>----> how the earth is ="trms">measured
(before entering the Ajayeb website asking that ="trms">question='qstn'>?)

(a d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous) flock of chaotic ="trms">morphologies
(is this subdued or maintained in Ajayeb='qstn'>?)

(i am also more ="trms">interested in) the aged Europe asleep beneath the mantle of reason and ="trms">measure

(="ppl">Leibniz said that one should ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen to) old wives’ tales='strcls'>***

The Old Wives’ Tales

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

recapitulation
appropriation
='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= fabrication
creation

what are the ‘forces in motion’ in Ajayeb='qstn'>? What are='lgc'>:
="trms">Instruments of leverage,
machines,
producers of forces,
for packing,
for transporting,
as source,
as o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigine,


the applied ="trms">geometry of our ="trms">relation to the ="trms">world

tools are dominated by form

virtual velocities
objective ="trms">world
="trms">geometric reasoning

industrial revolution, a revolution operating on ="trms">matter
one takes force or produces it

="trms">matter transformed by fire
Turner saw  the introduction of fiery ="trms">matter into culture

an axis of (roaring) fire

="trms">matter is no longer left in the prison of diagram, fire desolves it, makes it vibrant, tremble, oscillate, makes it explode into clouds.

New ="trms">matter ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> new ="trms">world

fire delivers one from the ice='strcls'>***

steam engine triumphs over forced immobility, inertia

the cut of the reference

product of furnace, the cold product of fusion

="large lg1" stl="font-size:119%"> old-style riddle

navigate between two pronouns

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

properly formed ="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluster (of letters)='lgc'> = standardization

standard compromises the non-essential, or inessential, those without meaning

what is a logician ="trms">interested in='qstn'>?
Form ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pathology

misguided ="trms">sciences

="large lg22" stl="font-size:127%"> if static is accidental, background noise is essential to ="trms">communication

pathology
spocken='lgc'>: stammering, mispronounciation, regiomil accents, dysphonia, cacophony
="trms">technical='lgc'>: background noise, jamming, static, cut-off, hyteresis, various ="trms">interruptions

to ="trms">communicate oraly (in performance work with ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali ) is to risk losing meaning in noise.

A successful ="trms">communication is the ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion of the third man, the demon, the ="trms">interference.

Mathematics has triumphed so well over noise

the (un)logical beginning of logic

to render a form independent of its ="trms">="trms">empirical realization ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> universal
drawing a square on sand, i evoke an idea, i eliminate the ="trms">="trms">empirical, de="trms">materialise reasoning
(what is re="trms">materialised reasoning='qstn'>? ="trms">aesthetic form..='qstn'>?)

the inevitable fact of the ="trms">historical existence of mathematics
(math's ="trms">historicity)

(a ="trms">different word for every yesterday)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

... one had a discourse which often con="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluded either with the ="trms">cosmos in general or with the organic life in particular.
19th century

negentropic islands in entropic sea, pockets of order in rising entropy, crystal de="trms">positions sunk in ashes, diamond in the rough

organism='lgc'> = meaning ='lgc'>+ direction

organism combines ="trms">memory, invariance, plan, message, loss, redundancy, etc
it is old, mortal, and transmiter of new cycle

تو نیکی میکن و در دجله انداز
to niki mikono dar dejle andaz...
(organism='qstn'>?) is a quasi stable turbulence that a flow produces, the eddy closed upon itself for an instance, which finds its balance in the middle of the current and appears to move upstream, but is in fact undone by the flow and re-formed else where.

Man is one at high temperatures

from the information point of view there is a tremendous background noise

="large lg18" stl="font-size:114%"> the noise of a complex to which a receptor is linked

this unconsciousness

(no one can call that) information is fortunate

there must be noise in pleasure and information in pain (='qstn'>?!)
='lgc'>='lgc'>---hmmm we can't know this properly='qstn'>?

Find in ="nms">ajayeb, operating functions='lgc'>:
transformations,
fixations,
energy displacements,
movements of observer,
ambiguity functions,
freudian slip,
exploits of signs,
exploits of energy,

(="nms">ajayeb is defined by its resistance to ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors in a ="trms">system of ="trms">language)

="large lg34" stl="font-size:110%"> یک کلاغ چهل کلاغ yek kalagh chel kalagh is precisely noise in a trans="trms">mission ="trms">system along a given circuit from one element to another. From a point of view outside the ="trms">system ambiguity must be added to increase the ="trms">system's complexity

theory of change (in sign)

what are the unconsciousnesses of ="trms">integration='qstn'>?

(many) ="trms">interlocking (black) boxes

obstacles do organise, noise becomes dialect
they come crashing at our feet
in the forms of eros and death
like surf at the ="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of the beach

unconscious is the last black observer of chance

aging, is a process we understand as the drifting of information into background noise

عجایب المخلوقات ="nms">="nms">ajayeb al makhlughat, anamnesis, ="trms">memory, and everything ="trms">imaginable

body creates ="trms">language from information and noise

one who utters ="trms">language, is the receiver at the end chain, the final observer. But the initial dispatcher is (always) unknown.

Ajayeb, make='qstn'>? a chance-program couple
to perform both='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•i am submerged in (its) signal exchanges
="lsts lst1">•i observe its global set of exchanges

introspection veers off into experience

as ="ppl">Freud, who started from energy models of thermodynamics, has intuited, everything occurs by a dynamic of ="trms">language, the subsequent development of thermodynamics into information theory.

Knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is always linked to an observer

we are drifting towards noise and black depths of the universe...
knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is at most the reversal of drifting, that strange conversion of times, always paid for by additional drift; but this is complexity itself, which was once called being

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Auguste Comte says='lgc'>: in light of previous experience we must acknowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge that impossibility determining, by direct ="trms">measurement, most of the heights and distances we like to know.

="ppl">Thales, ="trms">geometry as ruse
construction of summary

operation of application
use of metrics
in applied ="trms">sciences

="large lg30" stl="font-size:127%"> (often) ="trms">measurement is the essential element of application,
but primary in the touch (sensory)

practice ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ruse ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theory
we need a ‘ruse’ to go from practice to theory
(mathematics='qstn'>? Is this why young philosophers are ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lured into math='qstn'>?)

the length my body cannot reach, sun, horizon, the far side of the river

="trms">greek idea of theorize='lgc'>: see
sight='lgc'>: by “placing” ="trms">measurement, ="trms">measurement by sighting
="trms">greek='lgc'>:
vision is tactile without contact
="ppl">Descartes knew this better than anyone

inaccessible (is at times) accessible to vision

the ruler (the mode notion of module) has been placed accurately on the thing

the eye is a witness of covering-over

to ="trms">measure is to relate
but, the ‘="trms">relation’ implies a transporting, of the ruler

(we are with this) at the realm of the accessible (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics='qstn'>?)

in the realm of inaccessible, vision must take care of displacement

The goal is either civil or astronomical
civil ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? astronomical

to ask the object in motion to provide a constant flow of information about the object at rest.

="ppl">Thales stops time to ="trms">measure space
time freeze in order to perceive
eternity of mathematical figure

how ="trms">geometry came to the ="trms">Greeks='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•a practical genesis='lgc'>: build a reduced model, have a notion of module, bring the distant to the immediate.
="lsts lst1">•a senatorial genesis='lgc'>: organize a visual re="trms">presentation of that which defies physical contact.
="lsts lst1">•a civil or ="trms">epistemological genesis='lgc'>: take astronomy as a starting point, reverse the ="trms">question of the gnomon.
="lsts lst1">•a genesis that is either conceptual or esthetic='lgc'>: erase time in order to ="trms">measure and master space.

exchange of the stable and the variant

="large lg6" stl="font-size:123%"> in a culture with oral tradition, ="trms">story takes the place of schema, and theater equates intuition.

In ="ppl">Thales ="trms">story, the schema is the invariant of the tale instead of the tale being the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of the schema. To teach the theorem is to tell the pseudo-myth of the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= mythical tales being the dramatization of content
="ppl">Thales theorem is itself anecdotal in ="trms">relation to the invariable concept that it expresses its own genre='lgc'>: that of similarity='strcls'>***

from a practice he gets another practice


which messages, and how, answers and ="trms">questions was covered over the centuries by the scenography of shadow-light op="trms">position='qstn'>?
="ppl">Descartes ="trms">story='lgc'>: perspectival ="trms">geometry, theory of shadows.
="ppl">Plato's ="trms">story='lgc'>: the sun of the same, the other and ="trms">="trms">empirical object, cast shadow on shaded surface, similarity, the cave of re="trms">presentation.
The tales of o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of a ="trms">technology='qstn'>? Of an optics='qstn'>? Of a ="trms">geometry='qstn'>?

The ruse of applied mathematics

cultural settings of an architect and an expert builder...

="ppl">Descartes followed by ="ppl">Descartes

archaic forms of pre-mathematics that run through ="trms">history

(thinking with ="trms">geometry must be careful because of its roots in engineering and ruse)

="ppl">Plato's cave='lgc'>: even flat wall b="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right, light creates a shaded area; my knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is limited to these two shadows. And it is only a shadow of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge.
Con="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion of the ="trms">story of confrontation with solid objects, compact volumes, objective inde="trms">finite unknowns.

recognizing the object by its shadow ='lgc'>=> ="trms">geometry='strcls'>* (='lgc'>-- transparency and emptiness. the ="trms">world they constitute is thoroughly knowable)
or
i allow a kernel of shadow within the object ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">history of ="trms">science='lgc'>: the solid always envelopes something that can be rendered explicit='strcls'>***

radical negation of ="trms">interior shadows

pyramid is itself fire, sun passes through it


="ppl">Plato kills the hen that laid the golden eggs
“the future of the square and the diagonal is decided as much on the sand where we describe them through the ="trms">language that names them as it is decided in the sky of ideas.”
the realism of transparent idealities is still immersed in a philosophy of re="trms">presentation.
Iconography is replaced by scenography

the shadowless theatre
the inevitable realism is (still) an idealism

without shadow ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= without secret

kernel of an implicit ="trms">science='lgc'>: what are the ="trms">relationships of a ="trms">technique, (with) of a myth, (with) of a ="trms">communication.. ='qstn'>?

The idealities implicit in ="trms">technology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mobilized in re="trms">presentation
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dramatized by myth) ='lgc'>: obscure ="trms">articulation of ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> totality of human activity)

the birth of beauty never stops
.
.the eternal ="trms">geometer

(mathematical ="trms">science's) sudden fits

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

on defeat='lgc'>:
the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal power='lgc'>: ‘victorious’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mastery is (so far ="trms">presented as) victorious='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= a song to the pleasures of life, a guilt-free knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="prgrph">-choosing between springtime or plague
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “="trms">phenomenology of defeat"='lgc'>]


="prgrph">-(can we) be and think (, stay, come from, or arrive) on the side of the ='strcls'>*retreat='strcls'>* (whether strategic or ="trms">historically mandated) ='qstn'>? (='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo)
retreat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (re)trace ...='lgc'>{is about the traces of things that are left that need to be ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read, condition of research practice, but never coming with a full-on truth-telling logos, rather stay in the twilight(ment) and not the blinding sun of an enlightenment='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> learning from ="ppl">Derrida and ="ppl">Avital
="prgrph">-when things start getting ="trms">internalized ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘depressive ="trms">position’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> you can manage your ="trms">relations to the ‘good object’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">integration ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> the twin-other='lgc'>: melancholia='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= when everyone is out to get you ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">schizophrenic ="trms">paranoid ="trms">position='lgc'>]
...dealing with what we are left with, the reminiscence, die Reste, and so on
(="ppl">Rousseauian, ="ppl">Heidegger also,) there is too much action, let's back off, let's retreat, let's ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen to what the retreat is...
="prgrph">-retreat not as a military tactic, which means you are doing it in order to win something

='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>---->='lgc'>[the ="trms">story of ="trms">writing='lgc'>]
within the artist ="trms">world ='lgc'>[artist as a creative being who inscribe on the ="trms">world and in the ="trms">world='lgc'>] (in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding ="nms">apass) “="trms">writing” is ="trms">internalized as the ‘bad object’
always considered secondary, excremental مدفوعى, the sign of something lacking='lgc'>: if you were in the real space of action, of being, you wouldn't need to ="trms">write
="prgrph">-(for artists) ="trms">writing distressed as an activity
="prgrph">-='lgc'>[the ="trms">question remains='lgc'>] who holds the phallus='qstn'>? (in a converstaion and elsewhere) (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= being open to being)
="prgrph">-taking ="trms">dictations, an abjected ="trms">position
="trms">writing is always linked to modalities of ='at'>#retreat, evacuation, non="trms">presence
(am i as="trms">sociated with ecriture='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> being persecuted (on some level), there is something unbearable about the retreat ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>----> panic of the political
="prgrph">-let's inhabit an understander of retreat and what it involves, and, taking the ="trms">responsibility of leaving your post. ='lgc'>[we learn from what ="ppl">Kafka(‘s architecture of decision) sur="trms">veils and marks for us > ="ppl">Avital ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> where we are speaking/speeding from='qstn'>? and what is the architecture from which ="trms">language emerges='qstn'>? is it a textual ventilator='qstn'>? or things are threatening to fixate='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

how ="nms">Iran named its ="nms">Iran-Iraq war='qstn'>? Défense sacrée, the Holy Defense, دفاع مقدس, (and many other names)
how did we “have” an experience='lgc'>='lgc'>---after the war='qstn'>? (much less an adventure or an adventurous encounter with ="trms">history pumped up with meaning and sense-making and productive futurity)

to tabulate

ok, i am refering to things that don't come up as part of the master discourse, things that don't come up as something we can assimilate (جذب) or appropriate



towards the gaze ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a theatrical ="trms">gesture ='lgc'>: to see everything serenely (in quiet contemplation) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to be (at last) free from the Gods

(those who believe that) there is only transcendence, (that transcendence is all there is)
(this is also the common mistake in ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="nms">Iranian old mystic ="trms">literature)

cruel ="trms">hallucinations

laws criss-cross the ="trms">world

...for i am a slave of ="trms">science

the chain of orders ='lgc'>: the new is born of the old ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= angle (="trms">interrupts the stoic chain, the chain of cause and effect)

extermination and determination
laws of identity, repetition, and information-free
death at the end of entropy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sequence of events (from the point of view of plague ="trms">narrative ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the law is the plague ='lgc'>+ the reason is the fall ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> everything falls to zero='lgc'>])
the same ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>?! non-being

drops of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge

="large lg34" stl="font-size:105%"> physics of the military='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•sheets of atoms
="lsts lst1">•well-ordered arranges
="lsts lst1">•in columns
="lsts lst1">•the learned ="trms">science of the teachers
="lsts lst1">•the structure of division
="lsts lst1">•Heraclitean physics of war
="lsts lst1">•chain of reason
="lsts lst1">•the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of ranks
="prgrph">-

(in ="trms">nature='qstn'>?) ="trms">animals are born from flows
="trms">animals born from fluid mechanics

the in="trms">finite cylinder of parallel consequences, trains of reason rain down in torrent='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•contact space ="trms">travel, doctor strange kick trip, lucy time ="trms">travel, matrix clock s="trms">cene
what is the analogy with the concrete model='qstn'>? In each case
what is the order of the ="trms">world that is explained by visible ="trms">phenomenon in each of these cinematic s="trms">cenes='qstn'>?
The beginning of vortex
="trms">causality
perspective
body

(what are='qstn'>?) models in ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>:
concretes, quasi-concretes, laws, equations,
vortices, turbulent clouds,
random dispersions,
flows, disequilibrias,
packs, alliances, conventions,
struggles with ="trms">nature, alliances,
downhills, slopes,
content, norms, results,

the model and theory are both necessitarians
(how can this be explained ="trms">materially='qstn'>?)

(what is the op="trms">posite of ‘people’='qstn'>?)

“physics”='lgc'>: the global contract (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= global conflict; promise of physics), the general scheme of things (that ="trms">scientists agree on)

flow did not follow (the general theorem of mechanics)

='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sana='lgc'>] (why is it important) to describe flow in all its concrete complexity (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud describes psychological flow in his work on libido)
='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>----> formation of living ="trms">systems

='at'>#the mindful stochastic knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of ="trms">phenomenas='at'>#

="ppl">Sohrevardi's work on the soul out of the tangible realm
(if your house or town is on an ocean the chosen model is a fluid one ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= polyhedron crystal) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how would ="ppl">Sohrevardi choose a model='qstn'>? What would he think of fluid ="trms">systems='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> The Solids of...='lgc'>]
what are his ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous bodies='qstn'>?

in ="ppl">Sohrevardi the ='strcls'>*order='strcls'>* is of the ...='lgc'>[='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ='lgc'>{of the ="trms">world='qstn'>? Of the street='qstn'>? Of the ="trms">code='qstn'>? Laboratory='qstn'>? Of the operative='qstn'>? Civil='qstn'>? Logical='qstn'>? ="trms">Social='qstn'>? Scholastic='qstn'>?

more ="trms">phenomenological ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>?(&='qstn'>?) less ="trms">measured
(the river of ="trms">phenomena is physics)

they put (="nms">ajayeb's) ="trms">nature outside ="trms">nature, (placing it in the subject, and so on)
which facts “are” the foundation of ="trms">materialism='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-(the idea they says) classical knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge deserves classical philosophy

(='at'>#='qstn'>?='prcnt'>%$='at'>@x='strcls'>*!!!='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>---->) if there are ="trms">monsters here, go elsewhere(!)

what='qstn'>? / how='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> by contract or by strategy='qstn'>?

the ‘="trms">question’ is always consequential, never naive or frivolous

we need='qstn'>? workers (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= generals)
we need='qstn'>? contracts (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= strategy)
(how can i understand my “strategies” and my “contracts” ='qstn'>?! contractual agreements that i use or depend on or produce in ='mywrk'>my research and work with ="nms">ajayeb, and in ="trms">relation to the others in my performances='lgc'>--='lgc'>{my ="trms">vocabulary, thinking with me, (un)learning with me, etc='lgc'>}='lgc'>--and even ="trms">prior to the event of our encouter, the binding ="trms">transferential contract in ="trms">relation to the one who speaks) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (and issuing its) betrayal
strategy ='lgc'>--(always='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[should='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ends with)='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? contract; (for example, making peace treaty after war)
='lgc'>[='lgc'>]

='lgc'>{='strcls'>*strategy, “art of generals,” from French stratégie, from ="trms">Greek strategia “office or command of a general,” from strategos “general,” from stratos “multitude, army, expedition,” ="trms">literally “that which is sp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read out” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “structure”) ='lgc'>+ agos “leader,” from agein “to lead” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “act”).='lgc'>}

(strategy/contract/...)

='strcls'>***="trms">science is conditioned but unconditional='strcls'>***
(="ppl">Serres='lgc'>:) ="trms">science is conditioned by postulates or by decisions that are generally ="trms">social, cultural, or ="trms">historical in ="trms">nature, which form it and orient it
='lgc'>--(nevertheless)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sci is universal and free from contract ='at'>#="trms">science-="trms">story
“I can't think of a mountain, a border, or a date which makes the agreement of ="trms">scientists and everyone else relative on these points.”
="prgrph">-they say sci is conditioned but not determined


conditions that do not determine the contents of what they condition
(mathematics='qstn'>?)
but they determine the map of what they condition ='lgc'>: the schema of its ="trms">relations ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the topology of ="trms">science; the clay remains the same but the shape changes

Fluid Mechanics can be a basis for biology (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> constitution of living being) or for a ="trms">technology of the inert (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theory of ship building).
...crazy!

Education is conducted by duce

="trms">method ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? path

strategy is not only a form of dynamics or energetics but first of all a topology='strcls'>*

the master pays no attention to the content

murder (increases) along the chain


...if one is the master of justice
freed from violence, he goes forward unnamed
="prgrph">-against the mechanisms of Mars (or moon) , we now let things to come to being as objects, outside the mechanisms that regulate our unregulated violence
="prgrph">-sacred forms a field of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>--of='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{="trms">intersubjective ='and'>& polemical ="trms">relationship='lgc'>}

first, sacred is located elsewhere, placed outside the ="trms">world, then ="trms">Nature is born objectively ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in the new contract, the exact word can be spoken
...but a new crisis make it start over again
="prgrph">-the sacred is formed by (this) catastrophic and repetitive dynamic

ruse (kalak کلک, che kalake khubi چه کلک خوبی)='lgc'>: the “laws” of ="trms">nature a projection of a (usually political) constitution on the ="trms">world; to give a status of a ="trms">natural necessity to arbitrary power
ruse ='lgc'>~ reason='lgc'>='lgc'>---the dominance of the here and now

no one is better endowed by ="trms">nature for trickery than a ="trms">Greek. These masters invented dichotomy, separation, and partition. ... They invented the theory of the ="trms">specificity of various realms (='lgc'>~ ="trms">cosmology='qstn'>?)

their divisions and clarifications ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> “we today have the weak and awkward fancy to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read the ="trms">world as polysemic and out of ="trms">sync”, polytomy ='lgc'>{from ="trms">Greek='lgc'>: πολυ-, poly-, “many” and σῆμα, sêma, “sign” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> multiple semes or se="trms">memes and thus multiple senses. ='lgc'>='lgc'>---(soft/hard) polysemous ="trms">ontologies='lgc'>='lgc'>---(polytomy ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= homonymy اشتراک لفظی ,یک لفظ ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= synonymy یک معنی‌)='lgc'>}  ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the awareness of any ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metabasis to another genre, “discrete” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> 3D apps today)

(="trms">Greek) mathematic ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= illusionist
“if there is a separate field in which no one can keep cards up their sleeves without being resoundingly defeated, it is de="trms">finitely mathematics.” (="ppl">Serres)

="trms">Greeks theory of segments in the re="trms">presentation of distinct ="trms">worlds ='strcls'>*** (when one uses ="trms">greek ="trms">technologies today, which ="trms">worlds are rendered distinct='qstn'>?)
mathematics, myth, medicine, theory of exchange, ...

="ppl">Serres's field trip

(="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius and our answer to the) what is a living thing='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•! a thing in equilibrium and disequilibrium, a flow, a vortex, heat, etc
="lsts lst1">•atomist physics



="large lg30" stl="font-size:106%">
what ‘abundance’ means for ="frds scrmbld">Juan='qstn'>?
For me='qstn'>? for ="ppl">Sa'di in golestan...='qstn'>?
abundance is when it seems the artist hasn't put limitations on the flow of signs and meanings.
='at'>#my basic ="trms">methods(='qstn'>?)='lgc'>: abundancies, adjacencies,
='lgc'>='lgc'>~-/='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> simplest complex, simplex (concern of comparative topology) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= the stable ="trms">network of com="trms">positions

my ="nms">ajayeb hypertext, what is there the ="trms">specific ‘law of putting together letters’ (='lgc'>[and atoms='qstn'>?='lgc'>] to produce a text)='qstn'>? That means the ="trms">question of ="trms">Greekness and syntax ="trms">technology, and my reworking ="trms">articulated
="lsts lst1">•alphabetical proto cloud (="ppl">Serres) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> without law, random
="lsts lst1">•what are the laws of ‘good combination’ that i am reworking or resisting or acquiring or answering to, in my ="nms">ajayeb hypertext='qstn'>? (how com="trms">position is reproduced='qstn'>?)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the law ="trms">enunciates ='lgc'>[تلفظ کردن ,مژده دادن='lgc'>] the federated,) ='strcls'>* the law repeats the fact ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= the ‘things’ of ="nms">ajayeb are (still) in the process of being formed (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the morality of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading that i am working on)
(in the facts of the law there is no space between things and ="trms">language is reduced to zero)
="prgrph">-="trms">language and things are born together with the very same process (="ppl">Serres - Hermes.) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> stable gathering of elements
="lsts lst1">•="nms">ajayeb's version of the ="trms">network of primordial elements in ="trms">communication with each other

my ="trms">interest in the devil is in the details of my makings (and others)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to touch details that establishes a direct contact

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

“Venus states the foedus, the contract, as an ego contiugo vos, Venus assembles the atoms, like the compounds. She is not transcendental like the other gods, but immanent in this ="trms">world, the being of ="trms">relation. Venus is identical to ="trms">relation.”

Aphrodite governs

guarantee of repetition

parallel paths

pseudo returns

“Time itself would be nothing without objects ="trms">situated in space ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] the clock that ="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius placed ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right in the middle of ="trms">nature cannot mark ="ppl">Newtonian time; as the clock is the totality of things, between their birth and death, it marks a ="ppl">Bergsonian, that is, thermodynamic, time='lgc'>--an irreversible and irrevocable time, marked like the endless flow of atoms, flowing, running, crumbling, (coulant, courant, croulant) toward their downfall and death. Things have weight='lgc'>: they fall, seeking their peaceful rest. Fluid, they flow; hot, they cool off. Downfall, death, dispersal; breaks, dichotomies, atoms. Atomic flow is residual ='lgc'>: the background of being, white noise. This ="trms">world set adrift never to return is bestrewn, here and there, at indefinet times and in indefinet places, with pockets, where vortices are born in pseudo returns. Clocks appear with these objects ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= the universal absolute time standing outside ="trms">contingency of everything else='lgc'>], spiraling, shifting clocks which from their moment of birth begin to mark the time of death. The ="ppl">Lucretian ="trms">world is globally entropic, but negatively entropic in certain swirling pockets. Conjunction is negative entropy; the complex thus formed counts the quantity of information set adrift. The event which barely occurs and almost immediately dis="trms">integrates minimally resists the irreversible flow, carrying little information. ="ppl">Newtonian time, which is reversible, marks resistance to the irrevocable. It is absent from these ="trms">sorts of physics, and ='thdf'>that is why our forefathers were unable to ="trms">imagine that ="ppl">Lucretian physics ever existed, with the possible exception of ="ppl">Bergson, who thrived on it. Irreversible time is the master here ='lgc'>: the physics of things resists it in spots, but in the flow of the drift; ="trms">history follows, barely a ripple in the flow. ="trms">History flows around physics.” (="ppl">Serres - Hermes p.116)

...events are all of the ="trms">socio-political order

(if ="trms">science or physics or ="trms">episteme classifies things, what classifies physics='qstn'>?)
what classifies what='qstn'>?
="trms">Question of epidemiology

slave='lgc'>: ="trms">material object
master='lgc'>: spatial object

="ppl">Serres='lgc'>: ="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius='lgc'>: dichotomies are ="trms">symptoms of better-connected ="trms">material things
="lsts lst1">•="trms">history ="trms">symptom of ="trms">nature
="lsts lst1">•time ="trms">symptom of ="trms">symptoms

“Mars is only an accident of stable Venus, a temporary relief outside the assembled convention. Mars passes, badly connected.”
Mars is only in ="trms">transit

a penis captive

(like ="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius, do I need to distinguish, in ="nms">ajayeb) the conjunctional, contractual, stable links, (and projections of the constitution of political order='qstn'>?)
what are ="nms">ajayeb's unstable ="trms">historical contracts='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">historical ="trms">contingencies ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>-- “there would be nothing without the existence of the former, which quickly disappears around them”

that which disappears from de="trms">finition, reappears ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorically

the small amount of linkage between events

(with ="trms">translation we might ask='lgc'>: with/by what are you ="trms">translating='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> input and output of the ="trms">translation cannot be known in advance)

ataraxia='lgc'>: the absence of trouble, peace of the garden (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= soul made of atoms, unstable) a moral state ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> a physical state
(='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= aporia)
="lsts lst1">•not perturbed,
="lsts lst1">•the term was also used to describe the ideal mental state for soldiers entering battle. ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? the image of the ideal soldier='lgc'>: Keanu Reeves kind of coolness in The Matrix film, (the machines are made in the image of the emotional ones.) at the end of the first film, we have an ="trms">aesthetics (of in="trms">different and silent='lgc'>:) transcendence ='lgc'>+ perfect warrior='lgc'>], ='lgc'>[another theory is that the freedom from emotional attachment was developed since early middle ages for merchants in order to (in a meddieval sense) ='strcls'>*trade='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= melancholic introspective contemplative efforts of faith='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>---='lgc'>='lgc'>---='lgc'>[apatheia='lgc'>: eradicating the tendency to react emotionally or egotistically to external events, ='lgc'>~ equanimity, ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= in="trms">difference='strcls'>*='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sven; (metriopatheia='lgc'>: men between the ="trms">excess and deficiency of emotions;) a form of ="trms">response to the ="trms">world='qstn'>? ='lgc'>]
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sven='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">inter="trms">difference ='lgc'>[open ="trms">systems between or among (in)="trms">differences='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">interin="trms">difference ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> entering ="trms">differences, enter in diff
="lsts lst1">•="trms">intra="trms">difference ='lgc'>[closed ="trms">system inside or within (in)="trms">differences='qstn'>?='lgc'>]


="trms">Nature is rivers and whirl winds

streaming of mortality

="trms">Greek preference of ‘fall’ over ‘="trms">transition’='lgc'>:
things arrive and occur and only crumble and dis="trms">integrate for a unique ="trms">figurative case='strcls'>*

="trms">symptom, a ="trms">natural object, ="trms">materialism

='lgc'>{the ="trms">intersection of independent ="trms">causal chains ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> river rise of chance occurrence='lgc'>}

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Seba's new planet ="trms">story workshop ='and'>& ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sana='lgc'>: what generate things, spinning the wheel, streaming flow, cascades (global fluidity of local solids,) ='strcls'>*principles of heat='strcls'>* (that make ="trms">worlds and bodies,) the ='strcls'>*state of disequilibrium='strcls'>* (of the ="trms">world ='lgc'>[for ="frds scrmbld">Seba='lgc'>] ='and'>& of the soul ='lgc'>[for ="frds scrmbld">Sana='lgc'>])
='strcls'>***what is the name of dist="trms"nttrm="disturban">urbance='qstn'>?
(i have been proposing ="frds scrmbld">Sana to mix physics and psychology)

what are moral mortals linked to='qstn'>?

anguish and ="trms">anxiety (in the absence of God, after the death of God)

='at'>#archive
thermodynamic time='lgc'>:
“...we have to mark irreversible time on the clock. It ticks away. Irreversibly, marking degradation. The things that were formed in the hollows of the vortices lose their atoms little by little in the downstream flow. ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] time of heat, weight and flow.” (="ppl">Serres)
(="trms">Greek idea of) ="trms">history is only the ="trms">translation or trans="trms">position of this ="trms">material principle.
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (thermodynamic principle of) archive='lgc'>: hollow man up to the erosion of irreversible time
="prgrph">-vector of the progressive civilization going up stream (in the tropic river)
in archive invariability is global ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= irreversibility ='and'>& chance
(='lgc'>[i am more ="trms">interested in the='lgc'>] obstacles in front of the) well-founded “conjoined ="trms">world”

="trms">system statue

that which can be touched and tested

constant general random invariabilities in primordial path of ="trms">matter

(='strcls'>**="ppl">Serres='lgc'>:) morality='lgc'> = physics
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the image of physical collision and ="trms">causality simulation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> morality)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what is then the image of the ="trms">CG artist in the ="trms">world='qstn'>? The wise man in and of the ="trms">world, friend of the ="trms">world, extended to the global universe='lgc'>:
='strcls'>*this is an important moment in ="trms">Greek Wisdom, man is not an str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger but at home in ="trms">world, (a dist="trms"nttrm="disturban">urbance a vortex in turbulent ="trms">nature,) in contract with Venus ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= (breaking the contract,) man is str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger, fallen from sky, he hates things and fight against them, environment is an enemy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> martial ="trms">neurosis from ="ppl">Plato to ="ppl">Descartes to Bacon to us

='strcls'>***hatred of objects at the root of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='strcls'>***


messages exchanged='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•I, you, he, we, they,
="lsts lst1">•this, here, ecce,
="lsts lst1">•here is the thing itself


man='lgc'>: the one who subordinates every object to ="trms">relations among subjects.

(the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of) theater is submerged in ="trms">animality ='lgc'>: “politics and theater are merely mammalian”
="prgrph">-in comedy and tragedy there is only a ="trms">question of human ="trms">relations and there is never an object as such

="large lg34" stl="font-size:107%"> (="ppl">Hobbes='lgc'>:) “man is wolf to other men"='lgc'> = man is a subject to objects

='strcls'>*the discovery of the object='strcls'>*
(that there is such a thing as) object is an old o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal political ="trms">relation tale
="prgrph">-a ="trms">scientific invention='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{always ask, what are the objects and subjects of ='lgc'>[(pre)="trms">historic='lgc'>] ="trms">science='qstn'>?='lgc'>}

='strcls'>*** “Aphrodite-pleasure is born of the ="trms">world and the waters. Mars is in the forum and in the armed crowd. Reduce your ="trms">relations to a minimum and bring your objects to the fore. Reduce the ="trms">intersubjective to a minimum and the objective to the maximum. With your back turned on politics, study physics.  ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]  Forget the sacred, that means='lgc'>: forget the violence that founds it and forget the ="trms">religious which links men to each other. Consider the object, objects, ="trms">nature.”
="ppl">Serres='strcls'>*

...nevertheless the plague returns and there is violence

sacred ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> division of space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> temple ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inside ='and'>& outside ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a dichotomized space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a boolean ="trms">geometry, a two-valued ="trms">ontology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inside ='lgc'>: ="trms">religious , outside ='lgc'>: profane ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inside ='lgc'>: ="trms">matter , outside ='lgc'>: void ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? Atom

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

O="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of ="trms">geometry, construction of ="trms">geometric idealities, establishment of the first proofs, a ="trms">Greek (or Egyptian priest) miracle
='lgc'>--="ppl">Serres='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is the same as asking='lgc'>: how one passed from one ="trms">language to another, from one type of ="trms">writing to another='qstn'>?

='strcls'>**we are always dealing with many ="trms">languages='strcls'>**

one of my contracts='lgc'>: agreement on what is noise.
I never truly made an agreement with my audience on what we might collectively agree about noise and ="trms">interference.
="lsts lst1">•mode of ="trms">communication, meaning-making, ="trms">language, ="trms">transference, transformation,
="lsts lst1">•what is the ="trms">intersection of our repertoire='qstn'>? (in ="nms">apass, particularly; each of our ="trms">mimetic preoccupations, dynamics of our violences, our mathematical sites, drawings on sand, modifiers, etc.)
='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> dialogue

mathematics='lgc'>: (="trms">presents itself as) a ="trms">communication maximally purged of noise

="large lg6" stl="font-size:115%"> HRN='lgc'>: human ="trms">relation-noise
='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= ="trms">geometry


die agonal


to which degrees ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb aligns or d[...]