[...]s it closed='qstn'>?
What is its plan='qstn'>? How it transports ="trms">according to this plan='qstn'>? What are the circulating elements='qstn'>? What is stable there='qstn'>? What are the transformations when it transports='qstn'>?
Reservoir is libidinal='strcls'>*
capital, quantity of energy, constancy of force,
what can be applied to the pattern of circulations='qstn'>?
(of ="trms">vocabulary, value, money, desire, etc.)
what blocks circulation='qstn'>? Who or what governs it='qstn'>?
In answering, you reconstruct (the entire set of what you consider ="trms">interpretive)
application='lgc'>: strategy of conformity
explication='lgc'>: archaic and vague approximation
="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%">
it is not necessary to introduce ="trms">methods to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read a text='lgc'>: the ="trms">method is in the text. The text is its own criticism, its own explication, its own application.
Texts that operate='lgc'> = texts that are operated on ='lgc'>==> there are just texts
(there is no dichotomy in the operation)
="trms">technologies concerning heat, thermodynamics, shocked the traditional ="trms">world and shaped the one we are now working in.
...theories concerning processes of transformation.
...="trms">stages of alchemical initiations, archaic figure of fire,
How to make the ="trms">history of ="trms">science as effective as ="trms">science itself='qstn'>?
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
suddenly ="trms">science falls silent and mythology speaks
transsubstantiation
the astronomer falls in ='lgc'>==> the truth comes out
(ask maryam's astronomer='lgc'>: what disconnects the connected='qstn'>?)
throw the key to the text
for classification, connection is at stake, space is at stake
the formal invariant is something like a transport
what is worse for classification='qstn'>?
non-connections that are at stake
we shall never be free of space
fire, and transcendental subject
accidents of space (at work upon the multiplicity of spatial varieties
what is the program of topology='qstn'>?
My body lives in as many spaces as the group (the ="trms">society) has formed.
The euclidian house, the street and its ="trms">networks, open/closed garden, closed space of the sacred, school and its fix points and ="trms">social varieties, complex ensemble of flow charts, those of ="trms">language, of factory of family, of political party, and so forth.
..my body is plunged in the ="trms">intersection of this multiplicity
culture ='lgc'>: constructing precise and particular connections between such spatial varieties ='lgc'>--> “o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal ="trms">intersection”
topology; culture connects and joints, art delinks and disconnects
(the law of incest prohibition connects the disconnected)
pure ='lgc'>--> untainted ='lgc'>--> separated, enclosed
the discourse of rationality replacing the mythical text ='lgc'>--> art becomes ="trms">science ='lgc'>--- the realization of a project is left to reason
siyavosh/sohrab is one of the descendants of disseminated spaces, of catastrophic separation of the continuous
when Rostam recognises the mark of his son, ="ppl">Ferdosi giving a version of recognition s="trms">cene, connects ='lgc'>--> Oedipus
the son, the mother
="prgrph">-we can recognise a typological space='lgc'>: the same and the other='lgc'>: the separated
="prgrph">-the space of the ="trms">world is described requiring connection
="prgrph">-family tree
="prgrph">-parts are to be joined
="prgrph">-rostam and sohrab, siyavosh and sudabeh, cannot be ="trms">composed to form a single homogeneous space. (rostam and siyavosh do that)
="large lg1" stl="font-size:113%">
the pre="trms">suppose that before discourse there existed a ="trms">mutual policy of unrelated spaces ='lgc'>~ chaos
="prgrph">-the object or the target of (cultural) discourse is to connect
="prgrph">-to transform a chaos of separate spatial varieties into a space of ="trms">communication
="prgrph">-scatered ="trms">members, re-="trms">membered
="prgrph">-incoherent chaos, re="trms">formulated in the common space of transport when it is reconstructed
Kelileh
...she is the signatory of the discourse
...she ="trms">mimes the progress and delays of Demneh
="nms">ajayeb, a time when transport and itinerary were only myth
transport ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/=='qstn'>? transfer
="prgrph">-transport is a unitary space where transfer is ='strcls'>*always possible (like money)
="prgrph">-transfer is only a possibility
so, we must find the word or construct a conditional logos that ='strcls'>*al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready works to connect the crevices which run across the spatial chaos of disconnect varieties, the ='strcls'>*proto-worker of space='strcls'>*, the weaver in the topology of nodes
separations by sudden stoppage
="lsts lst1">•is this a myth='qstn'>?
a worker of the single space
(we are not)
euclidian space of every possible displace
(what are the displaces and displacements in Ajayeb='qstn'>? Be ="trms">specific)
(proliferating multiplicities of) unlinked ="trms">morphologies
(fire text)
to practice dichotomy (and its connected paths) one must know that its clefts follow and overlap the ancient mythical ="trms">narrative (in which ="trms">worlds are torn ...)
when ="trms">geometry is born myth falls silent
(the ancient journey) from islands to catastrophes, from passage to fault, from bridge to well, from relay to labyrinth
the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal function
the “new space” is always universal
the space of reason is universal, within it there are no more encounters
one can walk on two or four or three legs ='lgc'>--='lgc'>--> how the earth is ="trms">measured
(before entering the Ajayeb website asking that ="trms">question='qstn'>?)
(a d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous) flock of chaotic ="trms">morphologies
(is this subdued or maintained in Ajayeb='qstn'>?)
(i am also more ="trms">interested in) the aged Europe asleep beneath the mantle of reason and ="trms">measure
(="ppl">Leibniz said that one should ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen to) old wives’ tales='strcls'>***
The Old Wives’ Tales
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
recapitulation
appropriation
='lgc'>=/= fabrication
creation
what are the ‘forces in motion’ in Ajayeb='qstn'>? What are='lgc'>:
="trms">Instruments of leverage,
machines,
producers of forces,
for packing,
for transporting,
as source,
as o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigine,
the applied ="trms">geometry of our ="trms">relation to the ="trms">world
tools are dominated by form
virtual velocities
objective ="trms">world
="trms">geometric reasoning
industrial revolution, a revolution operating on ="trms">matter
one takes force or produces it
="trms">matter transformed by fire
Turner saw the introduction of fiery ="trms">matter into culture
an axis of (roaring) fire
="trms">matter is no longer left in the prison of diagram, fire desolves it, makes it vibrant, tremble, oscillate, makes it explode into clouds.
New ="trms">matter ='lgc'>==> new ="trms">world
fire delivers one from the ice='strcls'>***
steam engine triumphs over forced immobility, inertia
the cut of the reference
product of furnace, the cold product of fusion
old-style riddle
navigate between two pronouns
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
properly formed ="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluster (of letters)='lgc'> = standardization
standard compromises the non-essential, or inessential, those without meaning
what is a logician ="trms">interested in='qstn'>?
Form ='lgc'>--> pathology
misguided ="trms">sciences
if static is accidental, background noise is essential to ="trms">communication
="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%">
pathology
spocken='lgc'>: stammering, mispronounciation, regiomil accents, dysphonia, cacophony
="trms">technical='lgc'>: background noise, jamming, static, cut-off, hyteresis, various ="trms">interruptions
to ="trms">communicate oraly (in performance work with ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali ) is to risk losing meaning in noise.
A successful ="trms">communication is the ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion of the third man, the demon, the ="trms">interference.
Mathematics has triumphed so well over noise
="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%">
the (un)logical beginning of logic
to render a form independent of its ="trms">="trms">empirical realization ='lgc'>--> universal
drawing a square on sand, i evoke an idea, i eliminate the ="trms">="trms">empirical, de="trms">materialise reasoning
(what is re="trms">materialised reasoning='qstn'>? ="trms">aesthetic form..='qstn'>?)
the inevitable fact of the ="trms">historical existence of mathematics
(math's ="trms">historicity)
(a ="trms">different word for every yesterday)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg5" stl="font-size:124%">
... one had a discourse which often con="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluded either with the ="trms">cosmos in general or with the organic life in particular.
19th century
negentropic islands in entropic sea, pockets of order in rising entropy, crystal de="trms">positions sunk [...]