[...]le of the current and appears to move upstream, but is in fact undone by the flow and re-formed else where.

Man is one at high temperatures

from the information point of view there is a tremendous background noise

the noise of a complex to which a receptor is linked

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> this unconsciousness

(no one can call that) information is fortunate

there must be noise in pleasure and information in pain (='qstn'>?!)
='lgc'>='lgc'>---hmmm we can't know this properly='qstn'>?

Find in ="nms">ajayeb, operating functions='lgc'>:
transformations,
fixations,
energy displacements,
movements of observer,
ambiguity functions,
freudian slip,
exploits of signs,
exploits of energy,

(="nms">ajayeb is defined by its resistance to ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors in a ="trms">system of ="trms">language)

یک کلاغ چهل کلاغ yek kalagh chel kalagh is precisely noise in a trans="trms">mission ="trms">system along a given circuit from one element to another. From a point of view outside the ="trms">system ambiguity must be added to increase the ="trms">system's complexity

theory of change (in sign)

what are the unconsciousnesses of ="trms">integration='qstn'>?

(many) ="trms">interlocking (black) boxes

obstacles do organise, noise becomes dialect
they come crashing at our feet
in the forms of eros and death
like surf at the ="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of the beach

unconscious is the last black observer of chance

aging, is a process we understand as the drifting of information into background noise

عجایب المخلوقات ="nms">="nms">ajayeb al makhlughat, anamnesis, ="trms">memory, and everything ="trms">imaginable

body creates ="trms">language from information and noise

one who utters ="trms">language, is the receiver at the end chain, the final observer. But the initial dispatcher is (always) unknown.

Ajayeb, make='qstn'>? a chance-program couple
to perform both='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•i am submerged in (its) signal exchanges
="lsts lst1">•i observe its global set of exchanges

introspection veers off into experience

as ="ppl">Freud, who started from energy models of thermodynamics, has intuited, everything occurs by a dynamic of ="trms">language, the subsequent development of thermodynamics into information theory.

Knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is always linked to an observer

we are drifting towards noise and black depths of the universe...
knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is at most the reversal of drifting, that strange conversion of times, always paid for by additional drift; but this is complexity itself, which was once called being

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Auguste Comte says='lgc'>: in light of previous experience we must acknowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge that impossibility determining, by direct ="trms">measurement, most of the heights and distances we like to know.

="ppl">Thales, ="trms">geometry as ruse
construction of summary

operation of application
use of metrics
in applied ="trms">sciences

(often) ="trms">measurement is the essential element of application,
but primary in the touch (sensory)

practice ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ruse ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theory
we need a ‘ruse’ to go from practice to theory
(mathematics='qstn'>? Is this why young philosophers are ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lured into math='qstn'>?)

the length my body cannot reach, sun, horizon, the far side of the river

="trms">greek idea of theorize='lgc'>: see
sight='lgc'>: by “placing” ="trms">measurement, ="trms">measurement by sighting
="trms">greek='lgc'>:
vision is tactile without contact
="ppl">Descartes knew this better than anyone

inaccessible (is at times) accessible to vision

the ruler (the mode notion of module) has been placed accurately on the thing

the eye is a witness of covering-over

="large lg1" stl="font-size:129%"> to ="trms">measure is to relate
but, the ‘="trms">relation’ implies a transporting, of the ruler

(we are with this) at the realm of the accessible (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics='qstn'>?)

in the realm of inaccessible, vision must take care of displacement

The goal is either civil or astronomical
civil ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? astronomical

to ask the object in motion to provide a constant flow of information about the object at rest.

="ppl">Thales stops time to ="trms">measure space
time freeze in order to perceive
eternity of mathematical figure

how ="trms">geometry came to the ="trms">Greeks='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•a practical genesis='lgc'>: build a reduced model, have a notion of module, bring the distant to the immediate.
="lsts lst1">•a senatorial genesis='lgc'>: organize a visual re="trms">presentation of that which defies physical contact.
="lsts lst1">•a civil or ="trms">epistemological genesis='lgc'>: take astronomy as a starting point, reverse the ="trms">question of the gnomon.
="lsts lst1">•a genesis that is either conceptual or esthetic='lgc'>: erase time in order to ="trms">measure and master space.

exchange of the stable and the variant

in a culture with oral tradition, ="trms">story takes the place of schema, and theater equates intuition.

In ="ppl">Thales ="trms">story, the schema is the invariant of the tale instead of the tale being the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of the schema. To teach the theorem is to tell the pseudo-myth of the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= mythical tales being the dramatization of content
="ppl">Thales theorem is itself anecdotal in ="trms">relation to the invariable concept that it expresses its own genre='lgc'>: that of similarity='strcls'>***

from a practice he gets another practice


which messages, and how, answers and ="trms">questions was covered over the centuries by the scenography of shadow-light op="trms">position='qstn'>?
="ppl">Descartes ="trms">story='lgc'>: perspectival ="trms">geometry, theory of shadows.
="ppl">Plato's ="trms">story='lgc'>: the sun of the same, the other and ="trms">="trms">empirical object, cast shadow on shaded surface, similarity, the cave of re="trms">presentation.
The tales of o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of a ="trms">technology='qstn'>? Of an optics='qstn'>? Of a ="trms">geometry='qstn'>?

The ruse of applied mathematics

cultural settings of an architect and an expert builder...

="ppl">Descartes followed by ="ppl">Descartes

archaic forms of pre-mathematics that run through ="trms">history

(thinking with ="trms">geometry must be careful because of its roots in engineering and ruse)

="ppl">Plato's cave='lgc'>: even flat wall b="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right, light creates a shaded area; my knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is limited to these two shadows. And it is only a shadow of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge.
Con="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion of the ="trms">story of confrontation with solid objects, compact volumes, objective inde="trms">finite unknowns.

recognizing the object by its shadow ='lgc'>=> ="trms">geometry='strcls'>* (='lgc'>-- transparency and emptiness. the ="trms">world they constitute is thoroughly knowable)
or
i allow a kernel of shadow within the object ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">history of ="trms">science='lgc'>: the solid always envelopes something that can be rendered explicit='strcls'>***

radical negation of ="trms">interior shadows

pyramid is itself fire, sun passes through it

="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%">
="ppl">Plato kills the hen that laid the golden eggs
“the future of the square and the diagonal is decided as much on the sand where we describe them through the ="trms">language that names them as it is decided in the sky of ideas.”
the realism of transparent idealities is still immersed in a philosophy of re="trms">presentation.
Iconography is replaced by scenography

the shadowless theatre
the inevitable realism is (still) an idealism

without shadow ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= without secret

="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%"> kernel of an implicit ="trms">science='lgc'>: what are the ="trms">relationships of a ="trms">technique, (with) of a myth, (with) of a ="trms">communication.. ='qstn'>?

The idealities implicit in ="trms">technology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mobilized in re="trms">presentation
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dramatized by myth) ='lgc'>: obscure ="trms">articulation of ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> totality of human activity)

the birth of beauty never stops
.
.the eternal ="trms">geometer

(mathematical ="trms">science's) sudden fits

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg5" stl="font-size:158%">
on defeat='lgc'>:
the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal power='lgc'>: ‘victorious’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mastery is (so far ="trms">presented as) victorious='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= a song to the pleasures of life, a guilt-free knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="prgrph">-choosing between springtime or plague
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “="trms">phenomenology of defeat"='lgc'>]


="prgrph">-(can we) be and think (, stay, come from, or arrive) on the side of the ='strcls'>*retreat='strcls'>* (whether strategic or ="trms">historically mandated) ='qstn'>? (='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo)
retreat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (re)trace ...='lgc'>{is about the traces of things that are left that need to be ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read, condition of research practice, but never coming with a full-on truth-telling logos, rather stay in the twilight(ment) and not the blinding sun of an enlightenment='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> learning from ="ppl">Derrida and ="ppl">Avital
="prgrph">-when things start getting ="trms">internalized ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘depressive ="trms">position’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> you can manage your ="trms">relations to the ‘good object’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">integration ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/='lgc'>~[...]