[...]struction of summary

operation of application
use of metrics
in applied ="trms">sciences

(often) ="trms">measurement is the essential element of application,
but primary in the touch (sensory)

practice ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ruse ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theory
we need a ‘ruse’ to go from practice to theory
(mathematics='qstn'>? Is this why young philosophers are ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lured into math='qstn'>?)

the length my body cannot reach, sun, horizon, the far side of the river

="trms">greek idea of theorize='lgc'>: see
sight='lgc'>: by “placing” ="trms">measurement, ="trms">measurement by sighting
="trms">greek='lgc'>:
vision is tactile without contact
="ppl">Descartes knew this better than anyone

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> inaccessible (is at times) accessible to vision

the ruler (the mode notion of module) has been placed accurately on the thing

the eye is a witness of covering-over

to ="trms">measure is to relate
but, the ‘="trms">relation’ implies a transporting, of the ruler

(we are with this) at the realm of the accessible (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics='qstn'>?)

in the realm of inaccessible, vision must take care of displacement

The goal is either civil or astronomical
civil ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? astronomical

to ask the object in motion to provide a constant flow of information about the object at rest.

="ppl">Thales stops time to ="trms">measure space
time freeze in order to perceive
eternity of mathematical figure

how ="trms">geometry came to the ="trms">Greeks='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•a practical genesis='lgc'>: build a reduced model, have a notion of module, bring the distant to the immediate.
="lsts lst1">•a senatorial genesis='lgc'>: organize a visual re="trms">presentation of that which defies physical contact.
="lsts lst1">•a civil or ="trms">epistemological genesis='lgc'>: take astronomy as a starting point, reverse the ="trms">question of the gnomon.
="lsts lst1">•a genesis that is either conceptual or esthetic='lgc'>: erase time in order to ="trms">measure and master space.

exchange of the stable and the variant

in a culture with oral tradition, ="trms">story takes the place of schema, and theater equates intuition.

In ="ppl">Thales ="trms">story, the schema is the invariant of the tale instead of the tale being the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of the schema. To teach the theorem is to tell the pseudo-myth of the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= mythical tales being the dramatization of content
="ppl">Thales theorem is itself anecdotal in ="trms">relation to the invariable concept that it expresses its own genre='lgc'>: that of similarity='strcls'>***

from a practice he gets another practice


which messages, and how, answers and ="trms">questions was covered over the centuries by the scenography of shadow-light op="trms">position='qstn'>?
="ppl">Descartes ="trms">story='lgc'>: perspectival ="trms">geometry, theory of shadows.
="ppl">Plato's ="trms">story='lgc'>: the sun of the same, the other and ="trms">="trms">empirical object, cast shadow on shaded surface, similarity, the cave of re="trms">presentation.
The tales of o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of a ="trms">technology='qstn'>? Of an optics='qstn'>? Of a ="trms">geometry='qstn'>?

The ruse of applied mathematics

cultural settings of an architect and an expert builder...

="ppl">Descartes followed by ="ppl">Descartes

archaic forms of pre-mathematics that run through ="trms">history

="large lg6" stl="font-size:131%"> (thinking with ="trms">geometry must be careful because of its roots in engineering and ruse)

="large lg1" stl="font-size:148%"> ="ppl">Plato's cave='lgc'>: even flat wall b="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right, light creates a shaded area; my knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is limited to these two shadows. And it is only a shadow of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge.
Con="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion of the ="trms">story of confrontation with solid objects, compact volumes, objective inde="trms">finite unknowns.

recognizing the object by its shadow ='lgc'>=> ="trms">geometry='strcls'>* (='lgc'>-- transparency and emptiness. the ="trms">world they constitute is thoroughly knowable)
or
i allow a kernel of shadow within the object ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">history of ="trms">science='lgc'>: the solid always envelopes something that can be rendered explicit='strcls'>***

radical negation of ="trms">interior shadows

pyramid is itself fire, sun passes through it


="ppl">Plato kills the hen that laid the golden eggs
“the future of the square and the diagonal is decided as much on the sand where we describe them through the ="trms">language that names them as it is decided in the sky of ideas.”
the realism of transparent idealities is still immersed in a philosophy of re="trms">presentation.
Iconography is replaced by scenography

the shadowless theatre
the inevitable realism is (still) an idealism

without shadow ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= without secret

kernel of an implicit ="trms">science='lgc'>: what are the ="trms">relationships of a ="trms">technique, (with) of a myth, (with) of a ="trms">communication.. ='qstn'>?

The idealities implicit in ="trms">technology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mobilized in re="trms">presentation
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dramatized by myth) ='lgc'>: obscure ="trms">articulation of ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> totality of human activity)

the birth of beauty never stops
.
.the eternal ="trms">geometer

(mathematical ="trms">science's) sudden fits

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

on defeat='lgc'>:
the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal power='lgc'>: ‘victorious’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mastery is (so far ="trms">presented as) victorious='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= a song to the pleasures of life, a guilt-free knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="prgrph">-choosing between springtime or plague
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “="trms">phenomenology of defeat"='lgc'>]


="prgrph">-(can we) be and think (, stay, come from, or arrive) on the side of the ='strcls'>*retreat='strcls'>* (whether strategic or ="trms">historically mandated) ='qstn'>? (='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo)
retreat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (re)trace ...='lgc'>{is about the traces of things that are left that need to be ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read, condition of research practice, but never coming with a full-on truth-telling logos, rather stay in the twilight(ment) and not the blinding sun of an enlightenment='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> learning from ="ppl">Derrida and ="ppl">Avital
="prgrph">-when things start getting ="trms">internalized ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘depressive ="trms">position’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> you can manage your ="trms">relations to the ‘good object’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">integration ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> the twin-other='lgc'>: melancholia='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= when everyone is out to get you ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">schizophrenic ="trms">paranoid ="trms">position='lgc'>]
...dealing with what we are left with, the reminiscence, die Reste, and so on
(="ppl">Rousseauian, ="ppl">Heidegger also,) there is too much action, let's back off, let's retreat, let's ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen to what the retreat is...
="prgrph">-retreat not as a military tactic, which means you are doing it in order to win something

='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>[the ="trms">story of ="trms">writing='lgc'>]
within the artist ="trms">world ='lgc'>[artist as a creative being who inscribe on the ="trms">world and in the ="trms">world='lgc'>] (in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding ="nms">apass) “="trms">writing” is ="trms">internalized as the ‘bad object’
always considered secondary, excremental مدفوعى, the sign of something lacking='lgc'>: if you were in the real space of action, of being, you wouldn't need to ="trms">write
="prgrph">-(for artists) ="trms">writing distressed as an activity
="prgrph">-='lgc'>[the ="trms">question remains='lgc'>] who holds the phallus='qstn'>? (in a converstaion and elsewhere) (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= being open to being)
="prgrph">-taking ="trms">dictations, an abjected ="trms">position
="trms">writing is always linked to modalities of ='at'>#retreat, evacuation, non="trms">presence
(am i as="trms">sociated with ecriture='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> being persecuted (on some level), there is something unbearable about the retreat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>='lgc'>--> panic of the political
="prgrph">-let's inhabit an understander of retreat and what it involves, and, taking the ="trms">responsibility of leaving your post. ='lgc'>[we learn from what ="ppl">Kafka(‘s architecture of decision) sur="trms">veils and marks for us > ="ppl">Avital ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> where we are speaking/speeding from='qstn'>? and what is the architecture from which ="trms">language emerges='qstn'>? is it a textual ventilator='qstn'>? or things are threatening to fixate='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

how ="nms">Iran named its ="nms">Iran-Iraq war='qstn'>? Défense sacrée, the Holy Defense, دفاع مقدس, (and many other names)
how did we “have” an experience='lgc'>='lgc'>---after the war='qstn'>? (much less an adventure or an adventurous encounter with ="trms">history pumped up with meaning and sense-making and productive futurity)

to tabulate

ok, i am refering to things that don't come up as part of the master discourse, things that don't come up as something we can assimilate (جذب) or appropriate



towards the gaze ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a theatrical ="trms">gesture ='lgc'>: to see everything serenely (in quiet contemplation) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to be (at last) free from the Gods

(those who believe that) there is only transcendence, (that transcendence is all there is)
(this is also the common mistake in ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="nms">Iranian old mystic ="trms">literature)

cruel ="trms">hallucinations

laws criss-cross the ="trms">world

...for i am a slave of ="trms">science

="large lg10" stl="font-size:108%"> the chain of orders ='lgc'>: the new is born of the old ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= angle (="trms">interrupts the stoic chain, the chain of cause and effect)

extermination and determination
laws of identity, repetition, and information-free
death at the end of entropy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sequence of events (from the point of view of plague ="trms">narrative ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the law is the plague ='lgc'>+ the reason is the fall ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> everything falls to zero='lgc'>])
the same ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>?! non-being

drops of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge

physics of the military='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•sheets of atoms
="lsts lst1">•well-ordered arranges
="lsts lst1">•in columns
="lsts lst1">•the learned ="trms">science of the teachers
="lsts lst1">•the structure of division
="lsts lst1">•Heraclitean physics of war
="lsts lst1">•chain of reason
="lsts lst1">•the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of ranks
="prgrph">-

(in ="trms">nature='qstn'>?) ="trms">animals are born from flows
="trms">animals born from fluid mechanics

the in="trms">finite cylinder of parallel consequences, trains of reason rain down in torrent='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•contact space ="trms">travel, doctor strange kick trip, lucy time ="trms">travel, matrix clock s="trms">cene
what is the analogy with the concrete model='qstn'>? In each case
what is the order of the ="trms">world that is explained by visible ="trms">phenomenon in each of these cinematic s="trms">cenes='qstn'>?
The beginning of vortex
="trms">causality
perspective
body

(what are='qstn'>?) models in ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>:
concretes, quasi-concretes, laws, equations,
vortices, turbulent clouds,
random dispersions,
flows, disequilibrias,
packs, alliances, conventions,
struggles with ="trms">nature, alliances,
downhills, slopes,
content, norms, results,

the model and theory are both necessitarians
(how can this be explained ="trms">materially='qstn'>?)

(what is the op="trms">posite of ‘people’='qstn'>?)

“physics”='lgc'>: the global contract (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= global conflict; promise of physics), the general scheme of things (that ="trms">scientists agree on)

flow did not follow (the general theorem of mechanics)

='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sana='lgc'>] (why is it important) to describe flow in all its concrete complexity (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud describes psychological flow in his work on libido)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>='lgc'>--> formation of living ="trms">systems

='at'>#the mindful stochastic knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of ="trms">phenomenas='at'>#

="ppl">Sohrevardi's work on the soul out of the tangible realm
(if your house or town is on an ocean the chosen model is a fluid one ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= polyhedron crystal) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how would ="ppl">Sohrevardi choose a model='qstn'>? What would he think of fluid ="trms">systems='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> The Solids of...='lgc'>]
what are his ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous bodies='qstn'>?

in ="ppl">Sohrevardi the ='strcls'>*order='strcls'>* is of the ...='lgc'>[='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ='lgc'>{of the ="trms">world='qstn'>? Of the street='qstn'>? Of the ="trms">code='qstn'>? Laboratory='qstn'>? Of the operative='qstn'>? Civil='qstn'>? Logical='qstn'>? ="trms">Social='qstn'>? Scholastic='qstn'>?

more ="trms">phenomenological ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>?(&='qstn'>?) less ="trms">measured
(the river of ="trms">phenomena is physics)

they put (="nms">ajayeb's) ="trms">nature outside ="trms">nature, (placing it in the subject, and so on)
which facts “are” the foundation of ="trms">materialism='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-(the idea they says) classical knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge deserves classical philosophy

="large lg6" stl="font-size:130%"> (='at'>#='qstn'>?='prcnt'>%$='at'>@x='strcls'>*!!!='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) if there are ="trms">monsters here, go elsewhere(!)

what='qstn'>? / how='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> by contract or by strategy='qstn'>?

the ‘="trms">question’ is always consequential, never naive or frivolous

we need='qstn'>? workers (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= generals)
we need='qstn'>? contracts (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= strategy)
(how can i understand my “strategies” and my “contracts” ='qstn'>?! contractual agreements that i use or depend on or produce in ='mywrk'>my research and work with ="nms">ajayeb, and in ="trms">relation to the others in my performances='lgc'>--='lgc'>{my ="trms">vocabulary, thinking with me, (un)learning with me, etc='lgc'>}='lgc'>--and even ="trms">prior to the event of our encouter, the binding ="trms">transferential contract in ="trms">relation to the one who speaks) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (and issuing its) betrayal
strategy ='lgc'>--(always='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[should='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ends with)='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? contract; (for example, making peace treaty after war)
='lgc'>[='lgc'>]

='lgc'>{='strcls'>*strategy, “art of generals,” from French stratégie, from ="trms">Greek strategia “office or command of a general,” from strategos “general,” from stratos “multitude, army, expedition,” ="trms">literally “that which is sp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read out” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “structure”) ='lgc'>+ agos “leader,” from agein “to lead” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “act”).='lgc'>}

(strategy/contract/...)

='strcls'>***="trms">science is conditioned but unconditional='strcls'>***
(="ppl">Serres='lgc'>:) ="trms">science is conditioned by postulates or by decisions that are generally ="trms">social, cultural, or ="trms">historical in ="trms">nature, which form it and orient it
='lgc'>--(nevertheless)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sci is universal and free from contract ='at'>#="trms">science-="trms">story
“I can't think of a mountain, a border, or a date which makes the agreement of ="trms">scientists and everyone else relative on these points.”
="prgrph">-they say sci is conditioned but not determined


conditions that do not determine the contents of what they condition
(mathematics='qstn'>?)
but they determine the map of what they condition ='lgc'>: the schema of its ="trms">relations ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the topology of ="trms">science; the clay remains the same but the shape changes

Fluid Mechanics can be a basis for biology (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> constitution of living being) or for a ="trms">technology of the inert (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theory of ship building).
...crazy!

Education is conducted by duce

="trms">method ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? path

strategy is not only a form of dynamics or energetics but first of all a topology='strcls'>*

the master pays no attention to the content

murder (increases) along the chain


...if one is the master of justice
freed from violence, he goes forward unnamed
="prgrph">-against the mechanisms of Mars (or moon) , we now let things to come to being as objects, outside the mechanisms that regulate our unregulated violence
="prgrph">-sacred forms a field of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>--of='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{="trms">intersubjective ='and'>& polemical ="trms">relationship='lgc'>}

first, sacred is located elsewhere, placed outside the ="trms">world, then ="trms">Nature is born objectively ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in the new contract, the exact word can be spoken
...but a new crisis make it start over again
="prgrph">-the sacred is formed by (this) catastrophic and repetitive dynamic

ruse (kalak کلک, che kalake khubi چه کلک خوبی)='lgc'>: the “laws” of ="trms">nature a projection of a (usually political) constitution on the ="trms">world; to give a status of a ="trms">natural necessity to arbitrary power
ruse ='lgc'>~ reason='lgc'>='lgc'>---the dominance of the here and now

no one is better endowed by ="trms">nature for trickery than a ="trms">Greek. These masters invented dichotomy, separation, and partition. ... They invented the theory of the ="trms">specificity of various realms (='lgc'>~ ="trms">cosmology='qstn'>?)

their divisions and clarifications ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> “we today have the weak and awkward fancy to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read the ="trms">world as polysemic and out of ="trms">sync”, polytomy ='lgc'>{from ="trms">Greek='lgc'>: πολυ-, poly-, “many” and σῆμα, sêma, “sign” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> multiple semes or se="trms">memes and thus multiple senses. ='lgc'>='lgc'>---(soft/hard) polysemous ="trms">ontologies='lgc'>='lgc'>---(polytomy ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= homonymy اشتراک لفظی ,یک لفظ ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= synonymy یک معنی‌)='lgc'>}  ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the awareness of any ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metabasis to another genre, “discrete” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> 3D apps today)

(="trms">Greek) mathematic ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= illusionist
“if there is a separate field in which no one can keep cards up their sleeves without being resoundingly defeated, it is de="trms">finitely mathematics.” (="ppl">Serres)

="trms">Greeks theory of segments in the re="trms">presentation of distinct ="trms">worlds ='strcls'>*** (when one uses ="trms">greek ="trms">technologies today, which ="trms">worlds are rendered distinct='qstn'>?)
mathematics, myth, medicine, theory of exchange, ...

="ppl">Serres's field trip

(="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius and our answer to the) what is a living thing='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•! a thing in equilibrium and disequilibrium, a flow, a vortex, heat, etc
="lsts lst1">•atomist physics




what ‘abundance’ means for ="frds scrmbld">Juan='qstn'>?
For me='qstn'>? for ="ppl">Sa'di in golestan...='qstn'>?
abundance is when it seems the artist hasn't put limitations on the flow of signs and meanings.
='at'>#my basic ="trms">methods(='qstn'>?)='lgc'>: abundancies, adjacencies,
='lgc'>='lgc'>~-/='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> simplest complex, simplex (concern of comparative topology) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= the stable ="trms">network of com="trms">positions

my ="nms">ajayeb hypertext, what is there the ="trms">specific ‘law of putting together letters’ (='lgc'>[and atoms='qstn'>?='lgc'>] to produce a text)='qstn'>? That means the ="trms">question of ="trms">Greekness and syntax ="trms">technology, and my reworking ="trms">articulated
="lsts lst1">•alphabetical proto cloud (="ppl">Serres) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> without law, random
="lsts lst1">•what are the laws of ‘good combination’ that i am reworking or resisting or acquiring or answering to, in my ="nms">ajayeb hypertext='qstn'>? (how com="trms">position is reproduced='qstn'>?)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the law ="trms">enunciates ='lgc'>[تلفظ کردن ,مژده دادن='lgc'>] the federated,) ='strcls'>* the law repeats the fact ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= the ‘things’ of ="nms">ajayeb are (still) in the process of being formed (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the morality of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading that i am working on)
(in the facts of the law there is no space between things and ="trms">language is reduced to zero)
="prgrph">-="trms">language and things are born together with the very same process (="ppl">Serres - Hermes.) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> stable gathering of elements
="lsts lst1">•="nms">ajayeb's version of the ="trms">network of primordial elements in ="trms">communication with each other

my ="trms">interest in the devil is in the details of my makings (and others)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to touch details that establis[...]