[...]nvariant of the tale instead of the tale being the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of the schema. To teach the theorem is to tell the pseudo-myth of the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= mythical tales being the dramatization of content
="ppl">Thales theorem is itself anecdotal in ="trms">relation to the invariable concept that it expresses its own genre='lgc'>: that of similarity='strcls'>***

from a practice he gets another practice


which messages, and how, answers and ="trms">questions was covered over the centuries by the scenography of shadow-light op="trms">position='qstn'>?
="ppl">Descartes ="trms">story='lgc'>: perspectival ="trms">geometry, theory of shadows.
="ppl">Plato's ="trms">story='lgc'>: the sun of the same, the other and ="trms">="trms">empirical object, cast shadow on shaded surface, similarity, the cave of re="trms">presentation.
The tales of o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of a ="trms">technology='qstn'>? Of an optics='qstn'>? Of a ="trms">geometry='qstn'>?

The ruse of applied mathematics

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%"> cultural settings of an architect and an expert builder...

="ppl">Descartes followed by ="ppl">Descartes

archaic forms of pre-mathematics that run through ="trms">history

(thinking with ="trms">geometry must be careful because of its roots in engineering and ruse)

="ppl">Plato's cave='lgc'>: even flat wall b="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right, light creates a shaded area; my knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is limited to these two shadows. And it is only a shadow of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge.
Con="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion of the ="trms">story of confrontation with solid objects, compact volumes, objective inde="trms">finite unknowns.

recognizing the object by its shadow ='lgc'>=> ="trms">geometry='strcls'>* (='lgc'>-- transparency and emptiness. the ="trms">world they constitute is thoroughly knowable)
or
i allow a kernel of shadow within the object ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">history of ="trms">science='lgc'>: the solid always envelopes something that can be rendered explicit='strcls'>***

radical negation of ="trms">interior shadows

pyramid is itself fire, sun passes through it


="ppl">Plato kills the hen that laid the golden eggs
“the future of the square and the diagonal is decided as much on the sand where we describe them through the ="trms">language that names them as it is decided in the sky of ideas.”
the realism of transparent idealities is still immersed in a philosophy of re="trms">presentation.
Iconography is replaced by scenography

the shadowless theatre
the inevitable realism is (still) an idealism

="large lg6" stl="font-size:118%"> without shadow ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= without secret

kernel of an implicit ="trms">science='lgc'>: what are the ="trms">relationships of a ="trms">technique, (with) of a myth, (with) of a ="trms">communication.. ='qstn'>?

The idealities implicit in ="trms">technology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mobilized in re="trms">presentation
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dramatized by myth) ='lgc'>: obscure ="trms">articulation of ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> totality of human activity)

the birth of beauty never stops
.
.the eternal ="trms">geometer

(mathematical ="trms">science's) sudden fits

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

on defeat='lgc'>:
the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal power='lgc'>: ‘victorious’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mastery is (so far ="trms">presented as) victorious='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= a song to the pleasures of life, a guilt-free knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="prgrph">-choosing between springtime or plague
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “="trms">phenomenology of defeat"='lgc'>]


="prgrph">-(can we) be and think (, stay, come from, or arrive) on the side of the ='strcls'>*retreat='strcls'>* (whether strategic or ="trms">historically mandated) ='qstn'>? (='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo)
retreat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (re)trace ...='lgc'>{is about the traces of things that are left that need to be ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read, condition of research practice, but never coming with a full-on truth-telling logos, rather stay in the twilight(ment) and not the blinding sun of an enlightenment='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> learning from ="ppl">Derrida and ="ppl">Avital
="prgrph">-when things start getting ="trms">internalized ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘depressive ="trms">position’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> you can manage your ="trms">relations to the ‘good object’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">integration ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> the twin-other='lgc'>: melancholia='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= when everyone is out to get you ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">schizophrenic ="trms">paranoid ="trms">position='lgc'>]
...dealing with what we are left with, the reminiscence, die Reste, and so on
(="ppl">Rousseauian, ="ppl">Heidegger also,) there is too much action, let's back off, let's retreat, let's ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen to what the retreat is...
="prgrph">-retreat not as a military tactic, which means you are doing it in order to win something

='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>[the ="trms">story of ="trms">writing='lgc'>]
within the artist ="trms">world ='lgc'>[artist as a creative being who inscribe on the ="trms">world and in the ="trms">world='lgc'>] (in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding ="nms">apass) “="trms">writing” is ="trms">internalized as the ‘bad object’
always considered secondary, excremental مدفوعى, the sign of something lacking='lgc'>: if you were in the real space of action, of being, you wouldn't need to ="trms">write
="prgrph">-(for artists) ="trms">writing distressed as an activity
="prgrph">-='lgc'>[the ="trms">question remains='lgc'>] who holds the phallus='qstn'>? (in a converstaion and elsewhere) (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= being open to being)
="prgrph">-taking ="trms">dictations, an abjected ="trms">position
="trms">writing is always linked to modalities of ='at'>#retreat, evacuation, non="trms">presence
(am i as="trms">sociated with ecriture='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> being persecuted (on some level), there is something unbearable about the retreat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>='lgc'>--> panic of the political
="prgrph">-let's inhabit an understander of retreat and what it involves, and, taking the ="trms">responsibility of leaving your post. ='lgc'>[we learn from what ="ppl">Kafka(‘s architecture of decision) sur="trms">veils and marks for us > ="ppl">Avital ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> where we are speaking/speeding from='qstn'>? and what is the architecture from which ="trms">language emerges='qstn'>? is it a textual ventilator='qstn'>? or things are threatening to fixate='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

how ="nms">Iran named its ="nms">Iran-Iraq war='qstn'>? Défense sacrée, the Holy Defense, دفاع مقدس, (and many other names)
how did we “have” an experience='lgc'>='lgc'>---after the war='qstn'>? (much less an adventure or an adventurous encounter with ="trms">history pumped up with meaning and sense-making and productive futurity)

="large lg6" stl="font-size:127%"> to tabulate

ok, i am refering to things that don't come up as part of the master discourse, things that don't come up as something we can assimilate (جذب) or appropriate

="large lg6" stl="font-size:120%">

towards the gaze ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a theatrical ="trms">gesture ='lgc'>: to see everything serenely (in quiet contemplation) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to be (at last) free from the Gods

(those who believe that) there is only transcendence, (that transcendence is all there is)
(this is also the common mistake in ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="nms">Iranian old mystic ="trms">literature)

="large lg1" stl="font-size:124%"> cruel ="trms">hallucinations

laws criss-cross the ="trms">world

...for i am a slave of ="trms">science

the chain of orders ='lgc'>: the new is born of the old ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= angle (="trms">interrupts the stoic chain, the chain of cause and effect)

extermination and determination
laws of identity, repetition, and information-free
death at the end of entropy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sequence of events (from the point of view of plague ="trms">narrative ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the law is the plague ='lgc'>+ the reason is the fall ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> everything falls to zero='lgc'>])
the same ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>?! non-being

drops of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge

physics of the military='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•sheets of atoms
="lsts lst1">•well-ordered arranges
="lsts lst1">•in columns
="lsts lst1">•the learned ="trms">science of the teachers
="lsts lst1">•the structure of division
="lsts lst1">•Heraclitean physics of war
="lsts lst1">•chain of reason
="lsts lst1">•the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of ranks
="prgrph">-

(in ="trms">nature='qstn'>?) ="trms">animals are born from flows
="trms">animals born from fluid mechanics

the in="trms">finite cylinder of parallel consequences, trains of reason rain down in torrent='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•contact space ="trms">travel, doctor strange kick trip, lucy time ="trms">travel, matrix clock s="trms">cene
what is the analogy with the concrete model='qstn'>? In each case
what is the order of the ="trms">world that is explained by visible ="trms">phenomenon in each of these cinematic s="trms">cenes='qstn'>?
The beginning of vortex
="trms">causality
perspective
body

(what are='qstn'>?) models in ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>:
concretes, quasi-concretes, laws, equations,
vortices, turbulent clouds,
random dispersions,
flows, disequilibrias,
packs, alliances, conventions,
struggles with ="trms">nature, alliances,
downhills, slopes,
content, norms, results,

the model and theory are both necessitarians
(how can this be explained ="trms">materially='qstn'>?)

(what is the op="trms">posite of ‘people’='qstn'>?)

“physics”='lgc'>: the global contract (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= global conflict; promise of physics), the general scheme of things (that ="trms">scientists agree on)

flow did not follow (the general theorem of mechanics)

='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sana='lgc'>] (why is it important) to describe flow in all its concrete complexity (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud describes psychological flow in his work on libido)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>='lgc'>--> formation of living ="trms">systems

='at'>#the mindful stochastic knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of ="trms">phenomenas='at'>#

="ppl">Sohrevardi's work on the soul out of the tangible realm
(if your house or town is on an ocean the chosen model is a fluid one ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= polyhedron crystal) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how would ="ppl">Sohrevardi choose a model='qstn'>? What would he think of fluid ="trms">systems='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> The Solids of...='lgc'>]
what are his ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous bodies='qstn'>?

in ="ppl">Sohrevardi the ='strcls'>*order='strcls'>* is of the ...='lgc'>[='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ='lgc'>{of the ="trms">world='qstn'>? Of the street='qstn'>? Of the ="trms">code='qstn'>? Laboratory='qstn'>? Of the operative='qstn'>? Civil='qstn'>? Logical='qstn'>? ="trms">Social='qstn'>? Scholastic='qstn'>?

="large lg10" stl="font-size:121%"> more ="trms">phenomenological ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>?(&='qstn'>?) less ="trms">measured
(the river of ="trms">phenomena is physics)

they put (="nms">ajayeb's) ="trms">nature outside ="trms">nature, (placing it in the subject, and so on)
which facts “are” the foundation of ="trms">materialism='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-(the idea they says) classical knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge deserves classical philosophy

(='at'>#='qstn'>?='prcnt'>%$='at'>@x='strcls'>*!!!='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) if there are ="trms">monsters here, go elsewhere(!)

what='qstn'>? / how='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> by contract or by strategy='qstn'>?

the ‘="trms">question’ is always consequential, never naive or frivolous

we need='qstn'>? workers (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= generals)
we need='qstn'>? contracts (='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= strategy)
(how can i understand my “strategies” and my “contracts” ='qstn'>?! contractual agreements that i use or depend on or produce in ='mywrk'>my research and work with ="nms">ajayeb, and in ="trms">relation to the others in my performances='lgc'>--='lgc'>{my ="trms">vocabulary, thinking with me, (un)learning with me, etc='lgc'>}='lgc'>--and even ="trms">prior to the event of our encouter, the binding ="trms">transferential contract in ="trms">relation to the one who speaks) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (and issuing its) betrayal
strategy ='lgc'>--(always='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[should='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ends with)='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? contract; (for example, making peace treaty after war)
='lgc'>[='lgc'>]

='lgc'>{='strcls'>*strategy, “art of generals,” from French stratégie, from ="trms">Greek strategia “office or command of a general,” from strategos “general,” from stratos “multitude, army, expedition,” ="trms">literally “that which is sp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read out” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “structure”) ='lgc'>+ agos “leader,” from agein “to lead” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “act”).='lgc'>}

(strategy/contract/...)

='strcls'>***="trms">science is conditioned but unconditional='strcls'>***
(="ppl">Serres='lgc'>:) ="trms">science is conditioned by postulates or by decisions that are generally ="trms">social, cultural, or ="trms">historical in ="trms">nature, which form it and orient it
='lgc'>--(nevertheless)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sci is universal and free from contract ='at'>#="trms">science-="trms">story
“I can't think of a mountain, a border, or a date which makes the agreement of ="trms">scientists and everyone else relative on these points.”
="prgrph">-they say sci is conditioned but not determined


conditions that do not determine the contents of what they condition
(mathematics='qstn'>?)
but they determine the map of what they condition ='lgc'>: the schema of its ="trms">relations ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the topology of ="trms">science; the clay remains the same but the shape changes

Fluid Mechanics can be a basis for biology (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> constitution of living being) or for a ="trms">technology of the inert (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theory of ship building).
...crazy!

Education is conducted by duce

="large lg10" stl="font-size:124%"> ="trms">method ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? path

strategy is not only a form of dynamics or energetics but first of all a topology='strcls'>*

the master pays no attention to the content

murder (increases) along the chain


...if one is the master of justice
freed from violence, he goes forward unnamed
="prgrph">-against the mechanisms of Mars (or moon) , we now let things to come to being as objects, outside the mechanisms that regulate our unregulated violence
="prgrph">-sacred forms a field of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>--of='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{="trms">intersubjective ='and'>& polemical ="trms">relationship='lgc'>}

first, sacred is located elsewhere, placed outside the ="trms">world, then ="trms">Nature is born objectively ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in the new contract, the exact word can be spoken
...but a new crisis make it start over again
="prgrph">-the sacred is formed by (this) catastrophic and repetitive dynamic

ruse (kalak کلک, che kalake khubi چه کلک خوبی)='lgc'>: the “laws” of ="trms">nature a projection of a (usually political) constitution on the ="trms">world; to give a status of a ="trms">natural necessity to arbitrary power
ruse ='lgc'>~ reason='lgc'>='lgc'>---the dominance of the here and now

no one is better endowed by ="trms">nature for trickery than a ="trms">Greek. These masters invented dichotomy, separation, and partition. ... They invented the theory of the ="trms">specificity of various realms (='lgc'>~ ="trms">cosmology='qstn'>?)

their divisions and clarifications ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> “we today have the weak and awkward fancy to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read the ="trms">world as polysemic and out of ="trms">sync”, polytomy ='lgc'>{from ="trms">Greek='lgc'>: πολυ-, poly-, “many” and σῆμα, sêma, “sign” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> multiple semes or se="trms">memes and thus multiple senses. ='lgc'>='lgc'>---(soft/hard) polysemous ="trms">ontologies='lgc'>='lgc'>---(polytomy ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= homonymy اشتراک لفظی ,یک لفظ ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= synonymy یک معنی‌)='lgc'>}  ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the awareness of any ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metabasis to another genre, “discrete” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> 3D apps today)

(="trms">Greek) mathematic ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= illusionist
“if there is a separate field in which no one can keep cards up their sleeves without being resoundingly defeated, it is de="trms">finitely mathematics.” (="ppl">Serres)

="trms">Greeks theory of segments in the re="trms">presentation of distinct ="trms">worlds ='strcls'>*** (when one uses ="trms">greek ="trms">technologies today, which ="trms">worlds are rendered distinct='qstn'>?)
mathematics, myth, medicine, theory of exchange, ...

="ppl">Serres's field trip

(="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius and our answer to the) what is a living thing='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•! a thing in equilibrium and disequilibrium, a flow, a vortex, heat, etc
="lsts lst1">•atomist physics




what ‘abundance’ means for ="frds scrmbld">Juan='qstn'>?
For me='qstn'>? for ="ppl">Sa'di in golestan...='qstn'>?
abundance is when it seems the artist hasn't put limitations on the flow of signs and meanings.
='at'>#my basic ="trms">methods(='qstn'>?)='lgc'>: abundancies, adjacencies,
='lgc'>='lgc'>~-/='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> simplest complex, simplex (concern of comparative topology) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= the stable ="trms">network of com="trms">positions

my ="nms">ajayeb hypertext, what is there the ="trms">specific ‘law of putting together letters’ (='lgc'>[and atoms='qstn'>?='lgc'>] to produce a text)='qstn'>? That means the ="trms">question of ="trms">Greekness and syntax ="trms">technology, and my reworking ="trms">articulated
="lsts lst1">•alphabetical proto cloud (="ppl">Serres) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> without law, random
="lsts lst1">•what are the laws of ‘good combination’ that i am reworking or resisting or acquiring or answering to, in my ="nms">ajayeb hypertext='qstn'>? (how com="trms">position is reproduced='qstn'>?)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the law ="trms">enunciates ='lgc'>[تلفظ کردن ,مژده دادن='lgc'>] the federated,) ='strcls'>* the law repeats the fact ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= the ‘things’ of ="nms">ajayeb are (still) in the process of being formed (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the morality of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading that i am working on)
(in the facts of the law there is no space between things and ="trms">language is reduced to zero)
="prgrph">-="trms">language and things are born together with the very same process (="ppl">Serres - Hermes.) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> stable gathering of elements
="lsts lst1">•="nms">ajayeb's version of the ="trms">network of primordial elements in ="trms">communication with each other

my ="trms">interest in the devil is in the details of my makings (and others)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to touch details that establishes a direct contact

="large lg14" stl="font-size:123%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

“Venus states the foedus, the contract, as an ego contiugo vos, Venus assembles the atoms, like the compounds. She is not transcendental like the other gods, but immanent in this ="trms">world, the being of ="trms">relation. Venus is identical to ="trms">relation.”

="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%"> Aphrodite governs

guarantee of repetition

parallel paths

pseudo returns

="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%"> “Time itself would be nothing without objects ="trms">situated in space ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] the clock that ="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius placed ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right in the middle of ="trms">nature cannot mark ="ppl">Newtonian time; as the clock is the totality of things, between their birth and death, it marks a ="ppl">Bergsonian, that is, thermodynamic, time='lgc'>--an irreversible and irrevocable time, marked like the endless flow of atoms, flowing, running, crumbling, (coulant, courant, croulant) toward their downfall and death. Things have weight='lgc'>: they fall, seeking their peaceful rest. Fluid, they flow; hot, they cool off. Downfall, death, dispersal; breaks, dichotomies, atoms. Atomic flow is residual ='lgc'>: the background of being, white noise. This ="trms">world set adrift never to return is bestrewn, here and there, at indefinet times and in indefinet places, with pockets, where vortices are born in pseudo returns. Clocks appear with these objects ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>=/= the universal absolute time standing outside ="trms">contingency of everything else='lgc'>], spiraling, shifting clocks which from their moment of birth begin to mark the time of death. The ="ppl">Lucretian ="trms">world is globally entropic, but negatively entropic in certain swirling pockets. Conjunction is negative entropy; the complex thus formed counts the quantity of information set adrift. The event which barely occurs and almost immediately dis="trms">integrates minimally resists the irreversible flow, carrying little information. ="ppl">Newtonian time, which is reversible, marks resistance to the irrevocable. It is absent from these ="trms">sorts of physics, and ='thdf'>that is why our forefathers were unable to ="trms">imagine that ="ppl">Lucretian physics ever existed, with the possible exception of ="ppl">Bergson, who thrived on it. Irreversible time is the master here ='lgc'>: the physics of things resists it in spots, but in the flow of the drift;[...]