[...]the gaze ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a theatrical ="trms">gesture ='lgc'>: to see everything serenely (in quiet contemplation) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to be (at last) free from the Gods

(those who believe that) there is only transcendence, (that transcendence is all there is)
(this is also the common mistake in ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="nms">Iranian old mystic ="trms">literature)

cruel ="trms">hallucinations

laws criss-cross the ="trms">world

="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> ...for i am a slave of ="trms">science

the chain of orders ='lgc'>: the new is born of the old ='lgc'>=/= angle (="trms">interrupts the stoic chain, the chain of cause and effect)

extermination and determination
laws of identity, repetition, and information-free
death at the end of entropy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sequence of events (from the point of view of plague ="trms">narrative ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the law is the plague ='lgc'>+ the reason is the fall ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> everything falls to zero='lgc'>])
the same ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>?! non-being

drops of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge

physics of the military='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•sheets of atoms
="lsts lst1">•well-ordered arranges
="lsts lst1">•in columns
="lsts lst1">•the learned ="trms">science of the teachers
="lsts lst1">•the structure of division
="lsts lst1">•Heraclitean physics of war
="lsts lst1">•chain of reason
="lsts lst1">•the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of ranks
="prgrph">-

(in ="trms">nature='qstn'>?) ="trms">animals are born from flows
="trms">animals born from fluid mechanics

the in="trms">finite cylinder of parallel consequences, trains of reason rain down in torrent='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•contact space ="trms">travel, doctor strange kick trip, lucy time ="trms">travel, matrix clock s="trms">cene
what is the analogy with the concrete model='qstn'>? In each case
what is the order of the ="trms">world that is explained by visible ="trms">phenomenon in each of these cinematic s="trms">cenes='qstn'>?
The beginning of vortex
="trms">causality
perspective
body

(what are='qstn'>?) models in ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>:
concretes, quasi-concretes, laws, equations,
vortices, turbulent clouds,
random dispersions,
flows, disequilibrias,
packs, alliances, conventions,
struggles with ="trms">nature, alliances,
downhills, slopes,
content, norms, results,

the model and theory are both necessitarians
(how can this be explained ="trms">materially='qstn'>?)

(what is the op="trms">posite of ‘people’='qstn'>?)

“physics”='lgc'>: the global contract (='lgc'>=/= global conflict; promise of physics), the general scheme of things (that ="trms">scientists agree on)

flow did not follow (the general theorem of mechanics)

='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sana='lgc'>] (why is it important) to describe flow in all its concrete complexity (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud describes psychological flow in his work on libido)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>='lgc'>--> formation of living ="trms">systems

='at'>#the mindful stochastic knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of ="trms">phenomenas='at'>#

="ppl">Sohrevardi's work on the soul out of the tangible realm
(if your house or town is on an ocean the chosen model is a fluid one ='lgc'>=/= polyhedron crystal) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how would ="ppl">Sohrevardi choose a model='qstn'>? What would he think of fluid ="trms">systems='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> The Solids of...='lgc'>]
what are his ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous bodies='qstn'>?

in ="ppl">Sohrevardi the ='strcls'>*order='strcls'>* is of the ...='lgc'>[='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ='lgc'>{of the ="trms">world='qstn'>? Of the street='qstn'>? Of the ="trms">code='qstn'>? Laboratory='qstn'>? Of the operative='qstn'>? Civil='qstn'>? Logical='qstn'>? ="trms">Social='qstn'>? Scholastic='qstn'>?

more ="trms">phenomenological ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>?(&='qstn'>?) less ="trms">measured
(the river of ="trms">phenomena is physics)

they put (="nms">ajayeb's) ="trms">nature outside ="trms">nature, (placing it in the subject, and so on)
which facts “are” the foundation of ="trms">materialism='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-(the idea they says) classical knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge deserves classical philosophy

(='at'>#='qstn'>?='prcnt'>%$='at'>@x='strcls'>*!!!='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) if there are ="trms">monsters here, go elsewhere(!)

what='qstn'>? / how='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> by contract or by strategy='qstn'>?

the ‘="trms">question’ is always consequential, never naive or frivolous

we need='qstn'>? workers (='lgc'>=/= generals)
we need='qstn'>? contracts (='lgc'>=/= strategy)
(how can i understand my “strategies” and my “contracts” ='qstn'>?! contractual agreements that i use or depend on or produce in ='mywrk'>my research and work with ="nms">ajayeb, and in ="trms">relation to the others in my performances='lgc'>--='lgc'>{my ="trms">vocabulary, thinking with me, (un)learning with me, etc='lgc'>}='lgc'>--and even ="trms">prior to the event of our encouter, the binding ="trms">transferential contract in ="trms">relation to the one who speaks) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (and issuing its) betrayal
strategy ='lgc'>--(always='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[should='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ends with)='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? contract; (for example, making peace treaty after war)
='lgc'>[='lgc'>]

="large lg1" stl="font-size:137%"> ='lgc'>{='strcls'>*strategy, “art of generals,” from French stratégie, from ="trms">Greek strategia “office or command of a general,” from strategos “general,” from stratos “multitude, army, expedition,” ="trms">literally “that which is sp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read out” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “structure”) ='lgc'>+ agos “leader,” from agein “to lead” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “act”).='lgc'>}

(strategy/contract/...)

='strcls'>***="trms">science is conditioned but unconditional='strcls'>***
(="ppl">Serres='lgc'>:) ="trms">science is conditioned by postulates or by decisions that are generally ="trms">social, cultural, or ="trms">historical in ="trms">nature, which form it and orient it
='lgc'>--(nevertheless)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sci is universal and free from contract ='at'>#="trms">science-="trms">story
“I can't think of a mountain, a border, or a date which makes the agreement of ="trms">scientists and everyone else relative on these points.”
="prgrph">-they say sci is conditioned but not determined


conditions that do not determine the contents of what they condition
(mathematics='qstn'>?)
but they determine the map of what they condition ='lgc'>: the schema of its ="trms">relations ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the topology of ="trms">science; the clay remains the same but the shape changes

Fluid Mechanics can be a basis for biology (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> constitution of living being) or for a ="trms">technology of the inert (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theory of ship building).
...crazy!

Education is conducted by duce

="trms">method ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? path

strategy is not only a form of dynamics or energetics but first of all a topology='strcls'>*

the master pays no attention to the content

murder (increases) along the chain


...if one is the master of justice
freed from violence, he goes forward unnamed
="prgrph">-against the mechanisms of Mars (or moon) , we now let things to come to being as objects, outside the mechanisms that regulate our unregulated violence
="prgrph">-sacred forms a field of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>--of='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{="trms">intersubjective ='and'>& polemical ="trms">relationship='lgc'>}

="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%"> first, sacred is located elsewhere, placed outside the ="trms">world, then ="trms">Nature is born objectively ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in the new contract, the exact word can be spoken
...but a new crisis make it start over again
="prgrph">-the sacred is formed by (this) catastrophic and repetitive dynamic

ruse (kalak کلک, che kalake khubi چه کلک خوبی)='lgc'>: the “laws” of ="trms">nature a projection of a (usually political) constitution on the ="trms">world; to give a status of a ="trms">natural necessity to arbitrary power
ruse ='lgc'>~ reason='lgc'>='lgc'>---the dominance of the here and now

no one is better endowed by ="trms">nature for trickery than a ="trms">Greek. These masters invented dichotomy, separation, and partition. ... They invented the theory of the ="trms">specificity of various realms (='lgc'>~ ="trms">cosmology='qstn'>?)

their divisions and clarifications ='lgc'>==> “we today have the weak and awkward fancy to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read the ="trms">world as polysemic and out of ="trms">sync”, polytomy ='lgc'>{from ="trms">Greek='lgc'>: πολυ-, poly-, “many” and σῆμα, sêma, “sign” ='lgc'>==> multiple semes or se="trms">memes and thus multiple senses. ='lgc'>='lgc'>---(soft/hard) polysemous ="trms">ontologies='lgc'>='lgc'>---(polytomy ='lgc'>=/= homonymy اشتراک لفظی ,یک لفظ ='lgc'>=/= synonymy یک معنی‌)='lgc'>}  ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the awareness of any ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metabasis to another genre, “discrete” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> 3D apps today)

="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%"> (="trms">Greek) mathematic ='lgc'>=/= illusionist
“if there is a separate field in which no one can keep cards up their sleeves without being resoundingly defeated, it is de="trms">finitely mathematics.” (="ppl">Serres)

="trms">Greeks theory of segments in the re="trms">presentation of distinct ="trms">worlds ='strcls'>*** (when one uses ="trms">greek ="trms">technologies today, which ="trms">worlds are rendered distinct='qstn'>?)
mathematics, myth, medicine, theory of exchange, ...

="ppl">Serres's field trip

(="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius and our answer to the) what is a living thing='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•! a thing in equilibrium and disequilibrium, a flow, a vortex, heat, etc
="lsts lst1">•atomist physics


="large lg5" stl="font-size:142%">

what ‘abundance’ means for ="frds scrmbld">Juan='qstn'>?
For me='qstn'>? for ="ppl">Sa'di in golestan...='qstn'>?
abundance is when it seems the artist hasn't put limitations on the flow of signs and meanings.
='at'>#my basic ="trms">methods(='qstn'>?)='lgc'>: abundancies, adjacencies,
='lgc'>='lgc'>~-/='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> simplest complex, simplex (concern of comparative topology) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= the stable ="trms">network of com="trms">positions

my ="nms">ajayeb hypertext, what is there the ="trms">specific ‘law of putting together letters’ (='lgc'>[and atoms='qstn'>?='lgc'>] to produce a text)='qstn'>? That means the ="trms">question of ="trms">Greekness and syntax ="trms">technology, and my reworking ="trms">articulated
="lsts lst1">•alphabetical proto cloud (="ppl">Serres) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> without law, random
="lsts lst1">•what are the laws of ‘good combinat[...]