[...]the ="trms">world ='lgc'>[for ="frds scrmbld">Seba='lgc'>] ='and'>& of the soul ='lgc'>[for ="frds scrmbld">Sana='lgc'>])
='strcls'>***what is the name of dist="trms"nttrm="disturban">urbance='qstn'>?
(i have been proposing ="frds scrmbld">Sana to mix physics and psychology)

what are moral mortals linked to='qstn'>?

anguish and ="trms">anxiety (in the absence of God, after the death of God)

="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> ='at'>#archive
thermodynamic time='lgc'>:
“...we have to mark irreversible time on the clock. It ticks away. Irreversibly, marking degradation. The things that were formed in the hollows of the vortices lose their atoms little by little in the downstream flow. ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] time of heat, weight and flow.” (="ppl">Serres)
(="trms">Greek idea of) ="trms">history is only the ="trms">translation or trans="trms">position of this ="trms">material principle.
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (thermodynamic principle of) archive='lgc'>: hollow man up to the erosion of irreversible time
="prgrph">-vector of the progressive civilization going up stream (in the tropic river)
in archive invariability is global ='lgc'>=/= irreversibility ='and'>& chance
(='lgc'>[i am more ="trms">interested in the='lgc'>] obstacles in front of the) well-founded “conjoined ="trms">world”

="trms">system statue

that which can be touched and tested

constant general random invariabilities in primordial path of ="trms">matter

(='strcls'>**="ppl">Serres='lgc'>:) morality='lgc'> = physics
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the image of physical collision and ="trms">causality simulation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> morality)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what is then the image of the ="trms">CG artist in the ="trms">world='qstn'>? The wise man in and of the ="trms">world, friend of the ="trms">world, extended to the global universe='lgc'>:
='strcls'>*this is an important moment in ="trms">Greek Wisdom, man is not an str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger but at home in ="trms">world, (a dist="trms"nttrm="disturban">urbance a vortex in turbulent ="trms">nature,) in contract with Venus ='lgc'>=/= (breaking the contract,) man is str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger, fallen from sky, he hates things and fight against them, environment is an enemy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> martial ="trms">neurosis from ="ppl">Plato to ="ppl">Descartes to Bacon to us

='strcls'>***hatred of objects at the root of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='strcls'>***


messages exchanged='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•I, you, he, we, they,
="lsts lst1">•this, here, ecce,
="lsts lst1">•here is the thing itself


man='lgc'>: the one who subordinates every object to ="trms">relations among subjects.

(the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of) theater is submerged in ="trms">animality ='lgc'>: “politics and theater are merely mammalian”
="prgrph">-in comedy and tragedy there is only a ="trms">question of human ="trms">relations and there is never an object as such

(="ppl">Hobbes='lgc'>:) “man is wolf to other men"='lgc'> = man is a subject to objects

='strcls'>*the discovery of the object='strcls'>*
(that there is such a thing as) object is an old o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal political ="trms">relation tale
="prgrph">-a ="trms">scientific invention='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{always ask, what are the objects and subjects of ='lgc'>[(pre)="trms">historic='lgc'>] ="trms">science='qstn'>?='lgc'>}

='strcls'>*** “Aphrodite-pleasure is born of the ="trms">world and the waters. Mars is in the forum and in the armed crowd. Reduce your ="trms">relations to a minimum and bring your objects to the fore. Reduce the ="trms">intersubjective to a minimum and the objective to the maximum. With your back turned on politics, study physics.  ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]  Forget the sacred, that means='lgc'>: forget the violence that founds it and forget the ="trms">religious which links men to each other. Consider the object, objects, ="trms">nature.”
="ppl">Serres='strcls'>*

...nevertheless the plague returns and there is violence

sacred ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> division of space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> temple ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inside ='and'>& outside ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a dichotomized space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a boolean ="trms">geometry, a two-valued ="trms">ontology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inside ='lgc'>: ="trms">religious , outside ='lgc'>: profane ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inside ='lgc'>: ="trms">matter , outside ='lgc'>: void ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? Atom

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

O="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of ="trms">geometry, construction of ="trms">geometric idealities, establishment of the first proofs, a ="trms">Greek (or Egyptian priest) miracle
='lgc'>--="ppl">Serres='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is the same as asking='lgc'>: how one passed from one ="trms">language to another, from one type of ="trms">writing to another='qstn'>?

='strcls'>**we are always dealing with many ="trms">languages='strcls'>**

one of my contracts='lgc'>: agreement on what is noise.
I never truly made an agreement with my audience on what we might collectively agree about noise and ="trms">interference.
="lsts lst1">•mode of ="trms">communication, meaning-making, ="trms">language, ="trms">transference, transformation,
="lsts lst1">•what is the ="trms">intersection of our repertoire='qstn'>? (in ="nms">apass, particularly; each of our ="trms">mimetic preoccupations, dynamics of our violences, our mathematical sites, drawings on sand, modifiers, etc.)
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> dialogue

mathematics='lgc'>: (="trms">presents itself as) a ="trms">communication maximally purged of noise

HRN='lgc'>: human ="trms">relation-noise
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">geometry


die agonal


to which degrees ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb aligns or depends on the “new ="trms">language” of the inexhaustible discourse of mathematics as inherented from the ="trms">Greek ="trms">geometry into the ="trms">modern culture='qstn'>?

What are the inaugural ="trms">relation of the ="trms">geometric (metrological) ideogram to the ="trms">CG='qstn'>? And to the Egyptian priest='qstn'>?
What is compared, modeled, simulated='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•flood
="lsts lst1">•fires
="lsts lst1">•celestial fire
="lsts lst1">•catastrophes
="lsts lst1">•violence of the elements
="lsts lst1">•


="large lg10" stl="font-size:113%"> ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>: doxographies (, legends and allegories) ="trms">composed in ="trms">natural ="trms">language (='qstn'>?)
='lgc'>=/= (the problem of) how to duplicate the cube ='lgc'>='lgc'>---,='lgc'>{thematized object of the complete ="trms">intersubjective ="trms">relation='lgc'>}
='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? alogon ='lgc'>=/= logos='lgc'>: proportion, ="trms">measured ="trms">relation, discourse;
alogon prohibits speaking

crisis and recast, ="trms">questions of archive


="frds scrmbld">Luisa, ="frds scrmbld">Foad
(the space of the ="trms">relation between) experience ='and'>& abstract ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> between sense ='and'>& purity
(an inquiry line for ="frds scrmbld">Luisa='lgc'>: try to figure out the status of pure ='lgc'>[which is impure='qstn'>? when ="trms">history changes='lgc'>])

my allegorical covers

meaning of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•non-disproportion
="lsts lst1">•nonviolence

="ppl">Socrates='lgc'>: you are in crisis because you are ignorant of ="trms">geometry

even='lgc'>: same
odd='lgc'>: other

برهان خلف borhane kholf, irrationality of the absurd

the irrational is ="trms">mimetic


='lgc'>='lgc'>==='lgc'>==='lgc'>==='lgc'>==='lgc'>==='lgc'>==='lgc'>==='lgc'>==='lgc'>==='lgc'>==='lgc'>===


“before-after” temporality ="trms">narrative

="ppl">Serres's ="trms">fabulous work on the effects of the style in ="trms">science
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> styles profile from (a ="trms">sort of) stability ='strcls'>*** -they inspire disciplines and furtilize fields of research, they seizes what is at stake in ="trms">sciences

="large lg22" stl="font-size:115%"> who believes that the passage from local to global is always possible='qstn'>?!
="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius answer is immediately “no”

in ="nms">apass each of us is somehow busy with the critique of unidimensional platitude characteristics of our milieus. / Is that the global notion in our rese="trms"nttrm="search">arches='qstn'>?

I want to take it up, maybe fulfill, and modify the project sketched out in ="nms">="nms">ajayeb al makhlughat 10 centuries ago.

='at'>#my ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading act with ="nms">ajayeb is like the practice of pencil monoprint on paper on a relief surface. The patterns of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading emerge as the pencil moves gently across the paper, pressing down or not. The paper, pencil, pressure, movement, the object behind, the touch of three elements, ="trms">interactive ="trms">interfacial patterns of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading="trms">writing with ="nms">ajayeb's textual corpus='strcls'>*


” ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] the industrialized ="trms">world is frequently condemned to considering the concrete universe as its re="trms">presentation.”
="ppl">="ppl">Stengers ='lgc'>+ P="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigogine

(='qstn'>?what do we have that helps us give up ='thdf'>the idea of a) rational ="trms">nature of the real
observation ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">generalization
="trms">measurement ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> precision

which precisions can be achieved by other than ="trms">measurement='qstn'>?

How not to ="trms">travel through the universe like free and self-determined gods='qstn'>? (='at'>#magicians)

="ppl">="ppl">Stengers > ="ppl">Leibniz ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luisa='lgc'>: “movement is produced within a full ="trms">world, an ="trms">interdependent ="trms">world in which nothing can happen that has not been made possible by the state of the set of bodies ="trms">according to a harmony that determines and checks at every moment the un="trms">folding of the ="trms">different movements.”


the full and compact ="trms">nature, version of ="nms">ajayeb

='mywrk'>my work in ="nms">apass is on a theory of transformation among ="trms">languages (not about the best point of view ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/=> ="trms">system ="trms">integrated ='lgc'>='lgc'>=/=> ="trms">trajectories calculated)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">natural ="trms">language
="lsts lst1">•="trms">system ="trms">language of ="trms">differential logic
="lsts lst1">•english grammar and syntax
="lsts lst1">•organic and ="trms">intersubjective space of my peers
="lsts lst1">•old ="trms">farsi
="lsts lst1">•="trms">animal
="lsts lst1">•


“speak of” ="trms">science
“speak about” ="trms">science
“speak” ="trms">science
“speak” ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics

speaking the ="trms">language of dynamics


what is still at stake in ="trms">science='lgc'>: the description of a ="trms">world of processes

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Lezra
In the European ="trms">imaginary, the public struggle over the “better” word makes the city (the polis) ='at'>@="nms">apass

="brkr">
="ppl">Derrida calls for patience, take care ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read on slowly. ="ppl">Kafka='lgc'>: all human errors are impatience. Radical patience, is the necessity to differ, but also to rush in precipitately, one has to make decisions='lgc'>: absolute urgency.

="large lg26" stl="font-size:123%"> ="trms">Literature for derrida, ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading in ='mywrk'>my works, is indis="trms">sociably bound up with ="trms">questions of politics, democracy and ="trms">responsibility, ="trms">religion, nationality and nationalism, identity and law.

E m foster, how can i tell what i think, till i see what i say.

What one finds repeatedly in derrida's work is the uncanny effect by which one is invited to sense the un="trms">folding of all his thinking starting out from anywhere, from any idea, any word, any thought that happen to be at issue. Deconstruction is the name for this='qstn'>?

="ppl">Derrida proceeds with patience and pleasure, to describe what is going on in a particular text or ="trms">situation.

Every ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading is difficult, ="ppl">Shakespeare, maulwürfe, mathematics. The difficulty of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading is in transforming the ways we are ="trms">obliged to think about those texts.

The transformation is crucially always al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready in the texts he ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reads. Describing what happens when ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading a passage of anything. Everything is in ="ppl">Shakespeare, in ="ppl">Plato, in ="ppl">Kafka. The ="trms">relation between description and transformation is uncanny.

To talk about the logics of supplement is another way of attending the deconstructive effects of the and. To put into effect new discourses, new acts. This description and transformation is deconstruction, is more than a ="trms">language and no more than a ="trms">language.

There are always ="trms">differences, tensions, paradoxes in the text, between what a text says and what a text does.

="ppl">Derrida always begins (wherever he happens to find himself) in a ="trms">specific context, which is to say in trying to engage with a ="trms">specific text or s="trms">cene of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading.

(="trms">Writing is) is winking at someone (you like)  while ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening to my favorite music.

A ="trms">writing that is not structurally ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readable ='lgc'>-- iterable ='lgc'>-- beyond the death of the addressee, would not be ="trms">writing.

The supplementarity of digression, a ="trms">fictional supplementarity. ="ppl">Freud is compelled to tell a ="trms">story but in the act of doing so, he betrays the annulment or effective impossibility of this ="trms">story. Sons murder of primordial father. O="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of morality='lgc'>: earliest moral restrictions in primitive ="trms">society have been explained by us as reactions to a dead which gave those who performed it the concept of crime.

The feeling that a text is especially ="trms">written ‘for’ derrida... As if waiting for him to come along and point it out.

="ppl">Freud's ="trms">story is less the ="trms">narration of an ="trms">imaginary event than the simulacrum of ="trms">narration. ="ppl">Freud's quasi event, is at once of ="trms">fictional ="trms">narrative and as ="trms">narrative as ="trms">fictive. It is the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of ="trms">literature at the same time as the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of law, derrida sug="trms">gests.

="ppl">Kant, ="ppl">Freud, ="ppl">Kafka, what makes important all these thinkers for ="ppl">Derrida has to do with how each in their ="trms">different way brings out a ghostly or virtual ‘="trms">narrativity and ="trms">fiction’ at the very core of legal thought.

Law is always an idiom. An idiom is an expression with a meaning that cannot be guessed from the meanings of the individual words='lgc'>: its door concerns only you. One's ="trms">relation to the law is singular.

The drama of naming (='at'>@Sonja naming the dance, dancing the name, is she dancing the name of the dance)

john ="ppl">Keats, prospective; Williams ="ppl">Wordsworth, retrospective. Prospective work consists of hopeful preparation, anticipation of future power rather than meditative reflections on ="trms">past moments of insight and harmony. Oriented towards the future.

All i am doing today, like derrida, can be seen as a grafting (ghalameh zadan) or extension, supplement or prosthesis, an outgrowth from somewhere else, earlier on.

I will attach to the ="trms">story of maulwürfe like the shit on his head.

Recalling and reinventing ="ppl">Shakespeare, the idea is not to bring it from ="trms">past to ="trms">present, something that is al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready disjointed in time towards the future. I push the characters of ="ppl">King ="trms"nttrm="learn,clear,Clearl,Olearius">Lear to a future. The deconstructive ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading of the play has to do with the opening of the future itself. It is utterly important that you do something unpre="trms">dictable for yourself. If you are in the business of hate, ="trms">love suddenly, changing tracks brings the unexplainable to the ="trms">trajectory. Going in discipline is like riding a train on rails, i am not saying to go off the track and crash or stop, but to change track experimentally and to change gear. The tracks are built for us to move in the field of thought, they don't cover the whole surface, by moving along them we can witness the new to emerge from our ="trms">interdisciplinary run.

="ppl">Derrida shows, reminds, that we can never do anything ="trms">systematically.

="trms">Monstrosity in the ="trms">story Yal-o Ejdeha by ="ppl">Shamlu. ="trms">Monsters of the deep..

my aim was to show the ="trms">monstrosity of all the characters in ="ppl">King ="trms"nttrm="learn,clear,Clearl,Olearius">Lear not just Edmond. Edmond is the artist of the self. ="ppl">Shakespeare makes unacceptable characters. ="ppl">King ="trms"nttrm="learn,clear,Clearl,Olearius">Lear play is intolerable itself, an encounter with the opening of the future itself. Instead of giving in to the normalizing and legitimating re="trms">presentations which identity, recognize, and reduce everything too quickly, why not rather be ="trms">interested in theoretical ="trms">monsters, in ="trms">monstrosities which announce themselves in theoretical ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading.

The proper significance is simply and ="trms">categorically deferred forever, insistent strangeness of the force of deferral, (effecting what derrida has called) the singularity of the here and now.

“explained” is “explained away.”

unreasonable is not concealed necessarily.

Duty to ir="trms">responsibility

any phantasmatic organization, whether collective or individual, is the invention of a ="trms">drug, or of a ="trms">rhetoric of ="trms">drugs, be it aphrodisiac or not.
In talk, i ="trms">respond to the how of a ="trms">poem or text ="trms">dictating a kind of ad="trms">dictive ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading or desire in the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader.

The project of a text, the project of a theory

="trms">according to ="ppl">Freud, when the work of mourning is completed the ego becomes free and uninhabited again. Funeral speeches and related ="trms">writings, are possibilities that structures the movement of identification. Mourning is the ="trms">interiorization of the dead other, also its contrary. Politics is figured as first and foremost an organization of the time and space of mourning.

After him, it is all war and crumbling.

We know better than ever today that the dead must be able to work. And to cause to work, perhaps more than ever.


The meaning of meaning ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]deconstruction='lgc'>: a ="trms">sort of strategic device ='lgc'>+ opening ="trms">onto its own ="trms">abyss (one of the most influential approaches to texts) ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">method

="ppl">Campbell ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Derridean deconstruction is visual
="ppl">Derrida's thinking helps us take images ="trms">seriously (as philosophical artefacts)
="lsts lst1">•organizational image='lgc'>: the ="trms">aesthetic ambassador for the organization (it visualizes ='lgc'>+ gives ="trms">aesthetic value to it)
="lsts lst1">•advertisement='lgc'>: preeminent image of production and ="trms">consumption of the global economy

image='lgc'> = logocentric vision ='lgc'>--need='lgc'>='lgc'>--> problematizing ='lgc'>=/= solutionizing


="prgrph">-is there a spirit of critique that is not liberatory in purpose='qstn'>?

="ppl">Derridean deconstruction='lgc'>: a critical approach ='lgc'>--draw='lgc'>='lgc'>--> attention to the operations of ="trms">method itself (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">method)='lgc'>:
='lgc'>[='lgc'>~='qstn'>? feedback types:='lgc'>]
="lstsrd">1. ="trms">interventionist ='lgc'>--advocate='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">different/contradictory ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readings (of images)
="lstsrd">2. radical ='lgc'>--="trms">interest='lgc'>='lgc'>--> roots of meaning-making activity
="lstsrd">3. liberatory ='lgc'>--seek='lgc'>='lgc'>--> evoke justice (forcing an image to account for itself)
="lstsrd">4. ethical ='lgc'>--concern='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what is overlooked
="lstsrd">5. innovative (productive) ='lgc'>--promote='lgc'>='lgc'>--> non-traditional ways of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading (of ="trms">interpretting, of finding meaning)


intellectual climate in 1960s ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Derrida's deconstruction ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bringing Saussure's own work to its own radical paradoxical con="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Foucault's ="trms"nttrm="search">archeological approach ='lgc'>[="trms">question ='thdf'>the idea that human is an a ="trms">priori ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how humans have been diagnosed in psychiatry and (ab)normalized in criminal and sexual ='strcls'>*discourses='strcls'>* ='lgc'>==produce='lgc'>='lgc'>==> reality effects at the level of body='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Barthes's ="trms">semiology ='lgc'>=/= ='thdf'>the idea that the ="trms">author is the single and ="trms">authoritative source of meaning


="ppl">Derrida's ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list of concepts='lgc'>:
differance
retrait
revenant
dissemination
deconstruction
hymen
invagination
archiécriture
supplement
khora
pharmakon
scrypt
parergon
subjectile
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> levers applying torque گشتاور and displacement in the textual machinery


deconstruction
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> counter-intuitive analyses
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pre="trms">supposes a detailed knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of construction (one must become intimate with the ways something is assembled) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= cart blanche for meaning='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="frds scrmbld">Jassem's style of) ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading otherwise='lgc'>: passing the classical discipline (='lgc'>=/= abandon, jettison it) to explore what it omits, forgets, ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes, expels, marginalizes, dismisses, ignores, scorns, slights, takes too lightly, waves off, not ="trms">serious enough

="lsts lst1">•="trms">anthropcentric truth='lgc'>: a truth that appears to human beings
="lsts lst1">•="trms">instrumental truth='lgc'>: a truth aimed at getting things done (making things work)
="lsts lst1">•teleological truth='lgc'>: a truth which closes debate and fastens meaning


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]visual='lgc'> = a form of control (='lgc'><='lgc'>--="ppl">Campbell='lgc'>-- this aspect makes it central to organizational analyses) ='lgc'><='lgc'>==
="lstsrd">1. ='strcls'>*visual organizes reality by claiming status as the preeminent form of re="trms">presentation='strcls'>* (vision is the dominant tyrannical ="trms">phenomenology of the contemporary ="trms">world ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> all forms of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge can be ="trms">presented visually)
="lstsrd">2. ='strcls'>*conflation of the ‘seen='lgc'> = known’='strcls'>* ='lgc'>: “vision='lgc'> = ways of knowing='lgc'> = experiencing the ="trms">world” (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="trms">imagined inseparable) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='thdf'>the idea that depiction/picturing/seeing are ubiquitous features of the process by which most human beings come to know the ="trms">world as it really is for them
="lstsrd">3. ='strcls'>*visual organizes the ="trms">worldview of the seer='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> visual is at its most powerful when it is most invisble (='thdf'>for example ="trms">scientific diagrams, mapping ='at'>@="nms">apass)

='strcls'>***instances of visual control='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•uniforms
="lsts lst1">•packaging
="lsts lst1">•computer software packages
="lsts lst1">•brand logos
="lsts lst1">•buildings
="lsts lst1">•websites ='at'>@="nms">apass
="lsts lst1">•management reports
="lsts lst1">•staff
="lsts lst1">•servicescapes ='lgc'>[an environment where the first/primary perceived aspect is service='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•


harmful, deficient, deformed, secondary ='lgc'>=/= superman, supergirl

logocentrism='lgc'>: letting the logic lead the letter ='lgc'>--="ppl">Campbell='lgc'>='lgc'>--> images are logocentric in that they create meaning by appealing to a central apparently undeconstructible ="trms">system of ="trms">authoritative truth (appealing to sources of transcendence outside of the image) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for example forensic architecture images ='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Derrida's ='strcls'>*there is nothing outside of the text='strcls'>*='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•in investigating an image we often posses a logocentric vision, drawing it into convergence, making it coherent and giving it a non-contradictory and singularly ="trms">authoritative meaning


='lgc'>[title='lgc'>]
ruined coherent ="trms">heritage


there is no escaping the enclosure of (logocentrism of western tradition of) ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- we can critically engage it from within

bricolage
bricoleur ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> one is participating in the intellectual ="trms">heritage one is critiqing

death of man
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Barthes ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> death of ="trms">author
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Strauss ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> structura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list approach to human ="trms">nature
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Foucault ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">history of the ="trms">historical arbitrariness (of the human ="trms">sciences)
="lsts lst1">•
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> antihumanism (of ="ppl">Barthes and ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault) sug="trms">gests it might be possible to stand outside the humanist legacy (and analyse from a ="trms">position outside) ='lgc'>==="ppl">Derrida='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (escaping from human constitutes) a very human tendency that has been at work in the cultural and ="trms">social ="trms">imaginary since antiquity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for example ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault's archaeology='lgc'>: (to understand) ='strcls'>*how reason determined madness in ="trms">different eras by looking at how reason evolved ="trms">historically='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> puts the analyst outside the humanist legacy of reason ='lgc'>==restore='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical illusion of mastery and control
='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Derrida

(my problem with making alternative ='strcls'>*archives, gar="trms">dens, and maps='strcls'>* in art='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical complicity (with archive and garden) ='lgc'>+ critique we direct against complicity (with archive and garden) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we cannot give up the “='lgc'>+"='lgc'> = slip into the form, logic, implicit postulations of precisely what it seeks to contest


logocentrism operates in images by appealing to sources of transcendence outside of the image ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>for example
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]map='lgc'>: visual organization of the ="trms">world ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quickly erase or black box the circumstances and ="trms">history of their own construction ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> marshal vision into logocentric coherence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> act as reflection (='lgc'>=/= re="trms">presentation) of the ="trms">world

radical cartography is now an established sub-discipline of geography (='strcls'>*maps are deconstructed to identify their logos='strcls'>*) ='at'>@="frds">Sina's ="trms">mimesis of ="ppl">Olearius's cartography

deconstruction is most needed at precisely those images where our immediate reaction is to say “there's nothing to be deconstructed here” (“that's just the way it is”)

software design (website ="trms">interfaces) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> images of ="trms">technology


critical practice='lgc'>: producing a new knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of the text (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> explain the ideological necessity of its silence) ='lgc'>=/= make a whisper audible, complete what the text leaves unsaid

other='lgc'>: other meanings of a text, other ways of seeing things

self/other ='lgc'>--="ppl">Derrida='lgc'>='lgc'>--> it only has meaning insofar as it differs from something else
="lsts lst1">•every concept has its op="trms">posite or its other (somehow marked within it)
="lsts lst1">•the good one can be designated only through the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor of the bad one ='at'>#="trms">fable


deconstructing an image='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•looking at what the image in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes and ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes
="lsts lst1">•detecting the ="trms">social roles it creates
="lsts lst1">•examining the hierarchies that appear ="trms">natural in the image
='lgc'>}='lgc'><='lgc'>== ='strcls'>**visual re="trms">presentation works as much through what is not shown as what is shown='strcls'>** (Hall), through feints and deceptions (Mitchel), through gaps and silences (Joy ='lgc'>+ Venkatesh), through stated and unstated (Stern), through the not seen or said (="ppl">Rose)


="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='lgc'>: detailed and ="trms">specific examination (of a piece of text)='lgc'> = لاروب dredging machine ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> disturb the text (dissecting patiently and minutely the ="trms">narrative, structure, syntax, ="trms">figuration, images, ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors, metonyms استعمال لفظ در معنای غیرحقیقی majaz) ='lgc'>==(draw out)='lgc'>='lgc'>==> complexities, ambiguities, aporias, ironies, taken-for-grantedness, just-is-ness
='lgc'>--imply='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a critique of objectivity
='lgc'>{revelation='lgc'> = dist="trms"nttrm="disturban">urbance='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{alternative meaning='lgc'> = site of ="trms">simultaneous deconstruction='lgc'>}

dynamics of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading (close ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading)
="lstsrd">1. working of a text hides itselg (images of soap powder, ="trms">children's ="trms">science homework, computer chips, etc.)
="lstsrd">2. ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous inspection of the text
="lstsrd">3. text is not immune to ="trms">interpretation (='lgc'>~ text reconfigures itself ="trms">according to the touch of ="trms">history, personality, ="trms">method, intention, politics, culture of any given ="trms">interpretation ='lgc'>=/= closed space)

='strcls'>*="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='lgc'> = producing meaning='strcls'>* ='lgc'>=/= reflecting


="lsts lst1">•Toyota's advertisement ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an image of gay family life ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the image converges on a notion of multicultural pansexual divergence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">market conditions under which homosexuality is accepted
="lsts lst1">•Joe Camel campaign ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Joe (from Joseph Old Testament) shortened in colloquial american usages to “Joe”, which by the 1930s began to designate anyone whose real name is unknown or connoted the “most typical” of any ="trms">category of person ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= dinosaurs='lgc'>] ='lgc'>+ camel='lgc'>: ="trms">beast of burden and of humility (Aesop's ="trms">fables) and as creatures of uncontrollable lust (from depiction by monks in medieval times to teach moral ="trms">fables to the public)

performance of a textual sex change operation

(monotonality) monovisuality of the dominant visual message

logocentric='lgc'>: a transcendental signified to which the text refers


="ppl">Plato's powerful attack on ="trms">writing as “dead speech”='lgc'>: ="ppl">Socrates and Phaedrus walk in the countryside. ="ppl">Socrates recounts to him a myth about the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of ="trms">writing='lgc'>: the king Thamus is ="trms">presented with a ="trms">present from his son Theus; the gift of ="trms">writing. Theus tells his father that the gift will make his people wise as it will improve their ="trms">memory ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Derrida shows that in the same argument ="ppl">Socrates goes on to describe speech as another ="trms">sort of ="trms">writing; he actually uses a ="trms">writing ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor to describe the “true ="trms">nature” of speech “not merely as a knowing, living, animate discourse, but as an inscription of truth in the soul”


="large lg34" stl="font-size:104%"> deconstruction ='lgc'>=/= re-="trms">interpretation
     |                    |
impossible ='lgc'>+          providing a
plausible ="trms">story       ="trms">different ="trms">story


="large lg14" stl="font-size:108%"> deconstructive ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading (idio="trms">syncratic to the text) ='lgc'>==offer='lgc'>='lgc'>==> multiple ='and'>& contradictory potential meanings to the text


="ppl">Derridean approach to meaning making='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•cricular
="lsts lst1">•paradoxical
='lgc'>='lgc'>~= it requires us to ='strcls'>*deconstruct the deconstruction='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*work against meaning and ="trms">interpretation='strcls'>*


name of man='lgc'>: (the name of that being who throughout the entire ="trms">history has dreamed of full ="trms">presence='lgc'> = the reassuring foundation, the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin ='lgc'>=/= play)

='lgc'>[my ="trms">fable workshop was about this ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>] ="ppl">Derridean deconstruction of images ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
="lsts lst1">•drawing attention to the way image constructs itself in order to implicitly re="trms">present a single ="trms">history (='lgc'>=/= seeking to tell the truth about what X means)
="lsts lst1">•keeping alive the contra="trms">dictions within it (='lgc'>=/= solutionizing)


(='qstn'>?how to deconstruct ='lgc'>[iamges of='lgc'>]) nano="trms">technology='lgc'>: practice of manipulating all types of living and non-living ="trms">matter at its atomic level
="lsts lst1">•corporations portraying nano="trms">technology as a ="trms">positive and legitimate force (='lgc'>+ visually close down the possible meanings of its products)='lgc'> = Iron Man
="lsts lst1">•nanospace='lgc'>: planetary bodies afloat in the darkenss of ="trms">intergalactic space
="lsts lst1">•fantastical un="trms">serious endeavour


(='lgc'>[what is='qstn'>?='lgc'>] my problem with) message شعاری


='strcls'>**advertisement ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> confuse ="trms">agency ='and'>& ownership='strcls'>**

the fantastic is rescued by the human (face)

(in advertisement ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ='strcls'>**the ways in which knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='and'>& reality are marshalled into collective visual con="trms">sensus='strcls'>**


visual deconstruction ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigor towards the idio="trms">syncrasy and singularity of any text


restricted economy of the text ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> particular meaning ='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Derrida='lgc'>: moveing from a restricted ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> general economy of the text

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics='lgc'>: enterprise of returning (strategically, ideally) to an o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin (a ="trms">priority) thought to be simple, intact, normal, pure, standard, self-identical ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= to think in terms of derivation, complication, deterioration, accident='lgc'>]
='lgc'><='lgc'>--="ppl">Derrida='lgc'>-- (the most constant profound potent ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical ="trms">gesture in Western philosophy='lgc'>:) conceiving simple before the complex, essential before the accidental
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> logocentric thought='lgc'>: thought which does not adequately attend to the contra="trms">dictions inherent in its own medium ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='lgc'>[logocentrism:='lgc'>] (="trms">fable) faith in the status of ="trms">language as a lucid carrier of meaning (='lgc'>=/= attentiveness to the ="trms">materiality of ="trms">communication and the implications of such a project)

pecific ="trms">languages make ="trms">communication ="trms">material, and exploring the ="trms">interplay of terms within a ="trms">linguistic ="trms">system (='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? baroque) ='lgc'>=/= Enlightenment='lgc'> = Age of Reason (logos)

="brkr">


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Beauty and the ="trms">Beast
or, blast of the clean slate



(goddamn it)

The picture of a relatively un="trms">differentiated and continuous topological space undergoing discontinuous ="trms">transitions and progressively acquiring detail until it con="trms">denses into the ="trms">measurable and divisible metric space which we inhabit, is a powerful ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor for the cosmic genesis of spatial structure. (Intensive ="trms">Science ='and'>& Virtual Philosophy)

="large lg18" stl="font-size:129%"> baroque Trauerspiel, classical synthesis, ...
synthesis='lgc'>: synthetic thinking (the combination of ideas into a complex whole)
this is not a reasoning exercise (deducing particularity, etc.)

="trms">imagine you find a head. how do you search for the body='qstn'>? (research project)

graduating from ... and approaching ...
(from fairy tale ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> approach myth)


='lgc'>='lgc'>--> http://www.sinaseifee.com/DifficultForests.html
becoming Amazon as the fear of the male.
(Amazon as male hunter ="trms">symbol)

(="trms">symbol for) masculine gender principle
(to disavow sexual ="trms">difference)

I am not bringing the text to you, or you to the text.
as you have al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready guessed we have to destroy both ='thdf'>the notion of text and you, to some extent, in order to permit a ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading to constitutes itself.

is San'an a prince charming='qstn'>?
(let's examine)

the spiritually established death-birth (death of birth and birth of death) at the end of ="trms">story

="ppl">Miyazaki's faceless ="trms">monster (in Spirited Away 千と千尋の神隠し), with his flexible plasticity, has an issue with appearance. he goes from loneliness, to ="trms">love, to greed, and finally becomes a student body. he has great ="trms">agency in the beginning and docile in the end, ='lgc'>[اسیر صورت ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> اسیر معنی='lgc'>]


San'an is determined to see it through, the whole process

="large lg14" stl="font-size:111%"> the German super-ego
the German ego
to carefully inject some of German super-ego to the ="nms">Iranian ego

(for Anastasia) what is the next war='qstn'>?
ترسا

(to the audience='lgc'>:) you should feel free to make notes, because I am making notes while you are talking, and these kind of ="trms">lectures I am doing are the process of those note-makings.
I like to ="trms">interrupt you. the performance is itself an ="trms">interruption of you, like when we say in a conversation “may I ="trms">interrupt you” your pace, your velocity, your speech-acts, etc.


what is being ‘="trms">interested’ in the ="trms">history of illusion='qstn'>?


in your process in becoming woman, you might end up becoming a female robot.
(Tarsaa's part)
whose testicles are smashed here='qstn'>?
to the less molested .... (body of the pupil)
psycho-="trms">history


human preparedness for ="trms">inter-="trms">relations with ="trms">technology and ="trms">technologization



='strcls'>***test some fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lures


a ="trms">different brand of ="trms">anxiety (='qstn'>?)


walking on groundlessness, ="trms">literature, house of ="trms">literature='qstn'>?

protest against “was”

give ="trms">literature in its totality

initiate a program

we don't ="trms">love our selves nor our neighbors

San'an, when he thinks he is getting close, he has ="trms">abysses he has to clear

which ="trms">language the house speaks='qstn'>? or which ="trms">language German speaks='qstn'>?

house of ="trms">literature, house is the site of kinship too.
if ="trms">literature is like a house at all



un="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readable algorithm of encounter

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

I hope we can get along famously



='mywrk'>my work has been really about old forms in the city, how should we build,
tyranny,
packaging (packaging existing knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, the way for example the IT industry does it.)
am I against packaging='qstn'>?


rationalizing and separating functions in the city



place, space, face,



in the ="trms">history, the leg-less-stone and the lying-visage have been together. a study of apparition must in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clude the physical ="trms">material as well, not as counterparts, rather as its play-mate.

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

the structure of space in San'an ="trms">poetry

distinction between subject and object, between signifier and signified, encompassing the whole of dua="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic logic through its branching patterns, through its de="trms">finitions of set pathways between root and branch.

the Arborescent model of ="trms">relationships in San'an ="trms">story='qstn'>?

The rhizome likewise resists structures of domination, such as ='thdf'>the notion of “the mother tongue” in ="trms">linguistics, though it does admit to ongoing cycles of what ="ppl">Deleuze refers to as “deterritorializing” and “reterritorializing” moments.

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

about my performances='lgc'>:

“There is no longer a tripartite division between a field of reality (the ="trms">world) and a field of re="trms">presentation (the ="trms">book) and a field of subjectivity (the ="trms">author). Rather, an assemblage establishes connections between certain multiplicities drawn from each of these orders, so that a ="trms">book has no sequel nor the ="trms">world as its object nor one or several ="trms">authors as its subject.”
(="ppl">Deleuze - Rhizome)

...consists not in an argument, but in the ecstatic elaboration of a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor, a web of ="trms">interconnected concepts, the development of a new ="trms">vocabulary without a pause for explanation or so much as a simple de="trms">finition.

“...a mapping rather than a tracing”

“What distinguishes the map from the tracing is that it is entirely oriented toward an experimentation in contact with the real. The map does not reproduce an unconscious closed in upon itself; it constructs the unconscious”

“It fosters connections between fields, the removal of blockages... “
(removing some blockages of meaning-lock in San'an)


my ="trms">lecture, emphasizes the rhizomatic to foster ="trms">imaginative work that challenges typical critical forms.

not to overlook the working of ="trms">matters, and the exteriority of their ="trms">relations.

(in a ="trms">book, a ="trms">lecture, etc.) there are lines of ="trms">articulation or segmentarity, strata and territories; but also lines of flight, movements of deterritorialization and destratification.



(what are ="ppl">Attar's Sheikh's actual ="trms">authority as a teacher='qstn'>?)
(George Makdisi='lgc'>: “Madrasa and University in the Middle Ages”)
='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] “Perhaps the most fundamental ="trms">difference between the two ="trms">systems is ="trms">embodied in their ="trms">systems of certification; namely, in medieval Europe, the licentia docendi, or license to teach; in medieval Islam, the ijazah, or ="trms">authorization. In Europe, the license to teach was a license to teach a certain field of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge. It was conferred by the licensed masters acting as a corporation, with the consent of a Church ="trms">authority, in Paris, by the Chancellor of the Cathedral Chapter... Certification in the Muslim East remained a personal ="trms">matter between the master and the student. The master conferred it on an individual for a particular work, or works.” ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]

feeling cool and correct
(in) a parasitical golden age

what is “education” in a mystical ="trms">world (or actually a mystical ="trms">world-view)
how can be undermined or rewired, (“teaching” without education)


magical idealism

from Delphi-magiscism to the San'an

(does San'an actually wants to go to Greece='qstn'>?! but went to Italy='qstn'>?)
اقصای روم


the space we are founding ourselves in is not neutral, not innocent, not un-signed
it is paid for, has a certain architecture, (phallic work)

the intellectual mask...



="trms">semiotic of learning and thinking


(Maulwurf,) shit on your head, shit is the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of all gifts, when a ="trms">child offers his first donation, “look what I have produced!” I honor you with this Kacke.
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> http://www.sinaseifee.com/VomkleinenMaulwurf.html
how can we bring the variety of ="trms">animals into the singular butterfly ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor='qstn'>? (="ppl">Attar's ="trms">bird's butterfly effect)

Schmetterling! (parvaneh - پروانه)
(‘schmettern’ in German='lgc'>: v. smash, shatter, slam; blare, fanfare, bellow, roar) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--- in schmettern you al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready have the ‘smashing,’ the butterfly smashing in the windshield, by that we are in the land of ="trms">technology.

Schmetterlinghaus='qstn'>? (The Imperial Butterfly House in Vienna)
خرمن پروانه

Schmetterling is also a German (Reich Air Ministry) air-to-air missile project developed during the WWII, which is detonated by acoustic and photoelectric proximity fuses (Abstandszünder)



(="ppl">Jason Bahbak ="ppl">Mohaghegh)


time, space, being, death, subversion, pain, transcendence, victory, blood, ="ppl">Nietzsche, ="ppl">Heidegger, ="ppl">Adorno, ="ppl">Benjamin, ="ppl">Baudrillard,

="lsts lst1">•="trms">poetic violence, obscure elsewhere,
="lsts lst1">•="trms">imaginative reservoir.
="lsts lst1">•political, ="trms">poetic, spiritual, or ="trms">aesthetic sources of inspiration.
="lsts lst1">•the rebel factor

resistance-fight / ideological ="trms">dictator
artist-forerunner / experimental thinker
constellation of desire

ambush of destruction ='lgc'>=>
...="trms">internalization of toxicity
to assimilate the poisonous
mithridatic (“mehr-dad” معجون مهرداد)



what is the dominant information in San'an ="trms">world='qstn'>?
(ideological and) ="trms">literary ="trms">apparatus
issues of belonging and desertion

to endure the direct
="trms">epistemic fear

I sug="trms">gest we go through the ="trms">rhetorical treatises of Middle East political ="trms">past century


(mystic war='lgc'>:)
the decadent view of the ob="trms">literated


(swallowing partial glances of the)
“extinction of ="trms">society”
drinking it
these signals of vanishing are forms of training='qstn'>?
a ="trms">formula of continuation='qstn'>?

ancient models of defense='strcls'>****

مکانیزم دفاعی
other mature forms of defenses='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">sublimation
="lsts lst1">•projection='lgc'>: a characteristic that one perceives in oneself but seems unacceptable is instead attributed to another person, denial in attribution ='lgc'>[still popular ="ppl">Feuerbach's idea of “="trms">religion='lgc'> = projection”, “God='lgc'> = outward projection of a human's inward ="trms">nature” informing secular ="trms">anthropological explanation='lgc'>] نسبت دادن احساس خود به دیگری
="lsts lst2">◦it changes the reality (for the person who projects)
="lsts lst2">◦it operates unconsciously (the person won't accept that they project)
="lsts lst1">•rationalization='lgc'>: irrationalities are explained in a seemingly rational or logical manner and are made consciously tolerable, ad hoc hypothesis='lgc'>: to save it from being falsified ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>== introspection illusion='lgc'>: cognitive bias of the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of one's own state='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•fantasy
="lsts lst1">•denial
="lsts lst1">•reaction formation='lgc'>: ="trms">responses to ="trms">internal threats and ="trms">anxieties, ="trms">anxiety is mastered by exaggeration of the directly opposing tendency. phobia is always reaction formation='lgc'>: the person wants what he fears. ='lgc'>[solicitude (may be a reaction formation) against cruelty, pacifism against sadism, etc.='lgc'>] when ='strcls'>*instincts (and their derivatives) are arranged as pairs of op="trms">posites='strcls'>* (life/death, construction/destruction, action/passivity, dominance/sub="trms">mission); ="trms">techniques='lgc'>: exaggeration, compulsiveness, inflexibility='lgc'>: “reactive ="trms">love protests too much.” “the lady doth protest too much, methinks.” (it cannot adapt itself to changing circumstances as genuine emotions do)
="lsts lst2">◦intellectualization ='lgc'>{="trms">memory of event ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> intellectualization ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> conscious analysis of non-="trms">anxiety provoking information about an event='lgc'>}
="lsts lst2">◦dis="trms">sociation
="lsts lst2">◦displacement='lgc'>: means of dream-distortion, ego relocates ="trms">anxiety somewhere else, ="trms">transference of emotions/wishes
="lsts lst3">◾="trms">sublimation والایش ='lgc'>[a form of displacement='lgc'>]='lgc'>: long-term conversion of the initial (negative) impulse, (alchymical in Jung) transformation of shit into gold. ='lgc'>[in ="ppl">Freud='lgc'>: ‘="trms">sublimation='lgc'> = plasticity of the sexual instincts’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/= in ="ppl">Lacan='lgc'>: ‘="trms">sublimation='lgc'> = (usually cosmic='qstn'>?) process of creation in ex nihilo style’ ='lgc'>: an object (manufactured or not) defined in ="trms">relation to the emptiness of Das Ding (empty canvas) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">sublimation ='lgc'>~ dismissal/Verwerfung='lgc'>: obsessional ="trms">relational behaviour attributed to the avoidance of the primordial emptiness (of Das Ding) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>='qstn'>? ="trms">religion/art...
='strcls'>**penis ="trms">sublimates into ="trms">seriousness='strcls'>**, adolescence into ="trms">poetry, emotions into mystical art into dominance,,,='lgc'>]
="lsts lst2">◦repression/suppression='lgc'>: subduing in the unconscious (under the influence of the superego='qstn'>?)
="lsts lst1">•withdrawal
="lsts lst1">•regression='lgc'>: a way of relating to the ="trms">world that was formerly effective (to recapture some ="trms">childhood satisfaction)
="lsts lst1">•

="lsts lst1">•pathological defense mechanism='lgc'>: delusional projection, denial, distortion, extreme projection, splitting
="lsts lst1">•immature defense mechanism='lgc'>: acting out, fantasy, idealization, passive-aggression, projection, projective identification, somatization
="lsts lst1">•="trms">neurotic defense mechanism='lgc'>: displacement, dis="trms">sociation, hypochondriasis, isolation, rationalization, reaction formation, regression, repression, undoing
="lsts lst1">•mature defense mechanism='lgc'>: altruism, anticipation, humour, identification, intellectualization, introjection, ="trms">sublimation, suppression
="lsts lst1">•other defensive mechanisms='lgc'>: compartmentalization, defensive pessimism, exaggeration, minimisation, postponement of ="trms">affect

='strcls'>*it is job of defense mechanism to distort, transform, or falsify the perceived reality='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to help deal with the id or superego, reducing ="trms">anxiety


ego='lgc'>: part of our psyche that is reality based



='lgc'>[title='lgc'>]
methinks

...the absence of mercy

="trms">complain ='lgc'>=='lgc'>~ elegy ='lgc'>=='lgc'>~ prayer (='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> desire to future)
(elegy assumes that there is something in the information that makes a ="trms">difference and not in the receiver of info.)

(="trms">question to an ="nms">Iranian friend='lgc'>:) “why must we fasten our gaze to the objects of damage and derangement='qstn'>?” “why light lanterns to behold the corpse='qstn'>?” “or extend our focus on them='qstn'>?” (I am using ="ppl">Mohaghegh's words,) the extremist (or other ="trms">aesthetic-philosophical strands of extremisms) would tell us not to look away, for the thought and expression have taken the shape of a ‘meteorological device,’ forecasting seasons (of storm)...

(you take the mithridatic venom to) cross into the next level of temporal experience

he makes “engravings of the atrocity”
(حکاکی از) سبعیت

a fanatical ="trms">response to the storm


a charismatic ="trms">authority undertakes a ="trms">poetic ="trms">articulation
or a ="trms">poetic ="trms">articulation becomes committed to an ideological program
='lgc'>[="nms">Iran Iraq war='lgc'>]


mysticism, a protocol of extremity, geared towards the immensification of narrow vision
gigantic singularity
itself the hou[...]