[...]/> ='lgc'>[="ppl">Attar asking us to entertain the same mania when ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading Tazkirat al-Awliya='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

...lending cryptic terminologies and cosmic ideas

to become an echo of a profound legacy


we ask again='lgc'>: which phantom-sphere is more ="trms">interesting='qstn'>? more ="trms">aesthetically and philosophically attractive in its c="trms">ontours, appearances, and orchestrations='qstn'>?

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%"> which archive remains in fire throughout='qstn'>?

="prgrph">-which (archival='qstn'>?) constructs promise to survive us='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-things that run on hollow ="trms">spectacles of meanings and simulations of depth
="prgrph">-adapting old tales to new territories of experience


an apocalyptic significance in the master-disciple ="trms">relationship
(topology of ="trms">communication/education)


(mysticism) an excursion into the other="trms">worldly (or the eternal)
lending cryptic terminologies and cosmic ideas a palpable and resurgent quality.



THE pursuit='lgc'>: to become the echo of a profound legacy

the ="trms">question is not the legitimate/authentic knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges versus superstitious/mythic doctrines, rather='lgc'>: which phantom-sphere is more arresting='qstn'>? which archive remains in fire throughout='qstn'>?

="trms">modern-individuality versus the magnetic power of the sectarian voice..

counter-="trms">veiling de="trms">finitions of freedom='lgc'>: the freedom of in="trms">finite mediocritized choices versus the freedom to choose the all-engulfing one thing.

these preferences='lgc'>: on some remote place of calculation or in terms of immediate force='qstn'>?


(this talk might be) a critical rant

(eastern thirds='lgc'>:)
the voice of a strange immunity

sacred crimes

one is hard pressed to find a truth that does not have a dead body


never-ending allegory of loss and primal innocence

irrational desire of a no-man's land of an eternal immaturity


(an existential evacuation)
committing oneself to erratic wanderings in the desert ='lgc'>=> ="trms">translation of a familiar topology into an ="trms">ontological modality='qstn'>?

="large lg1" stl="font-size:118%"> the extravagant paradox of proximity and distance
(="trms">interiority and exteriority, ="trms">presence and absence)

civilizational taxonomies (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> versus animist taxonomies, in ="ppl">Attar's ="trms">animal-="trms">birds)



the (sacred boundaries of mysticism) and mystic boundaries of the civilized city
the peripheries of the city became mystic/sacred


mystical channels='strcls'>*


they ="trms">present ="trms">worlds immersed in a kind of constructed a ="trms">priori

two irrational analytical strands='lgc'>:
(1) to isolate the rare ="trms">technical and conceptual arsenal behind an ethnographically ="trms">imagined space (San'an's biography missing in ="ppl">Attar's Tazkirat al-Awliya='lgc'>--="ppl">Attar's obsession with biographies, he is ="trms">drugged by bios, totally high='lgc'>='lgc'>---he can't let go of them, he cannot detach from the absents, the paternals='qstn'>? his master-complex='qstn'>? has he forgotten to mention his teacher, San'an, in Tazkirat al-Awliya='qstn'>? ='lgc'>--="ppl">Attar is himself San'an='qstn'>? ="trms">drugged and doped by tastes and spices of his shop, his establishment. OR San'an is Ibn-Sagha (ابن ساقا)='qstn'>? (Ibn-Sagha was a Islamist jurist who lived in Baghdad 11th century, lived Muslim and died christian.) ="ppl">Attar's engagement with re="trms">membrance and bios ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> is the San'an's ="trms">narrative also about forgetting='qstn'>? Tazkirat (تذکره) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Tazakor (تذکر) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">member! ='lgc'>--we are now on how ="ppl">Attar's San'an influences ="ppl">Hafez='lgc'>--(حافظ) The ="trms">Memorizer. ="ppl">Hafez ="trms">loves the ="trms">story of San'an the non-="trms">memorizer, San'an loses his ‘hafeze’ (حافظه). (="trms">according to ="ppl">Hafez and San'an, the best student is the one who doesn't re="trms">member. precisely because they are trying so hard to remind San'an of what they thing ‘he’ is) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[Indian MATSYENDRANATH amnesia tale, tells the ="trms">story of a yogi who falls in ="trms">love with the woman kind='lgc'>--one of his students puts makeup and dances his ="trms">memory back to him. he must become the woman. there is a queer moment in the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin ="trms">story of the San'an, which ="ppl">Attar censures(='qstn'>?). he erased his name from the black-="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list of death-‘the forgottens’, then danced for him as a woman-="trms">story-teller. (muse is the mother of ="trms">memory.) the class struggle has obviously a Bollywood touch to it='lgc'>]='lgc'>='lgc'>-->="ppl">Attar's source and storage='qstn'>?)
regarding ="ppl">Hafez and San'an, the ="trms">poet must leave the home, the ="trms">poet must ="trms">travel foreign zones, and stay in the foreign. (this is, by the way, ="ppl">Heidegger's ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading of the ="trms">poet.) and that is also one ="ppl">Heideggerian ="trms">poetic ="trms">demand that ="ppl">Hafez is failing to reconcile with, when he is turned back, not having the balls to cross the Indian ocean.
(2) importance of an elite ="trms">rhetorical plane

initiatives towards the horizons of a mystical inquest


(cinematic) mystical landscapes
(what kind of mystical landscapes I am exploring in San'an's ="trms">story='qstn'>?)


the dominion of the partially unseen


guarding its inner workings and ="trms">trajectories
(the cinematic openness also is) guarantor of its constant mutability(='qstn'>?)



the exoteric logic of ="trms">interiority (reigning since centuries in ="nms">Iran)


for only the buried dimension is sovereign

secrecy ='lgc'>=/= lie
(I am a fan of lie and against secrecy)
talk about a theory of lie
(a talk about a theory of violence)



='lgc'>[the issue of='lgc'>: op="trms">posite, omen, and alarm (in art)='lgc'>]
omen ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? artwork
(omen is a ="trms">phenomenon that is buried to foretell the future, isn't that an attractive ="trms">trap for artist's self grandiosity='qstn'>?!)
omen has a binary answer
omen ='lgc'>=~ ‘audire’ (Latin root, to ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen)
omens come in the artistic and ="trms">poetic production='lgc'>--in the ="trms">poiesis='lgc'>--when the artist is young='lgc'>: the ="trms">fabulous age of self-assertion, and he or she starts way to big and later is abandoned or abused by it.


(enforcement of an elusive stance from within) the self-enveloped site of the event='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>----the artworks become closer to omens


at once episodic and ="trms">veiled, protecting their ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right to invisibility above all else


(perceive themselves as) the merchants of the unreasoned experience.
(as opposed to the mechanisms of ="trms">instrumental reason) ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>---- omens


="trms">Literatur(ware)haus
warehouse vs. Haus
(at the house of being)

warehouse of the irrational, a cellar-arena of provocation and unrest

I don't have an eloquent ="trms">language='lgc'>--I am not in the house of ="trms">language, but ="ppl">Attar is

transmutative
depthforming


sudden exposure to exile space

a postcultural ="trms">interaction (='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>--with no proximity to the ="trms">past or known ="trms">present
(am I trying to create proximity to ="trms">history in my ="trms">lectures versus my non-proximity in earlier visual works such as “vagabond” 2011 ="nms">Tehran)
is that to adopt an ='strcls'>******existence without context='strcls'>******='qstn'>?
(in ="trms">lectures, am I un-separating myself from my own ="trms">history='qstn'>?)


='strcls'>*reverie (=the mind flees across se="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluded planes)

="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%"> exile space ='lgc'>=~ refuge, solitude, immobility ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? nondialectics


='lgc'>[on Vagabond='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> http://www.sinaseifee.com/Vagabond.html
="prgrph">-domination of the partially unseen in my own film, ‘vagabond’
="prgrph">-did I believe that only the buried dimension is sovereign='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-continuously ="trms">interlacing experiences of solitude and immobility
="prgrph">-minima="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list side of mysticism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> stillness is a catalyst for acceleration='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-nomadic dis="trms">positions
="prgrph">-suspended (=the chasm of self-consciousness)
="prgrph">-


="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%"> ="trms">aesthetic tactility over ="trms">aesthetic fantasy
where is the cinematic-mystical ritual happening='qstn'>?

profound separation from the ="trms">networks of ="trms">social reality
the subjects betrays its own ="trms">history

="trms">interrupting the trans="trms">mission of the ="trms">episteme


the result of mystic disjointment ='lgc'>=> a renovated perception of all activity as self-forsaking (Tark-e Nafs='qstn'>? ترک نفس), (such that all locations appear scorched in turn)

="large lg5" stl="font-size:158%"> stab-through and un-brace one once was

San'an's mechanistic commitments, he need to first ="trms">book out of a place in order to ="trms">write text, or to ="trms">book himself in again
the San'an's ="trms">poem's ‘Will'='lgc'> = instinct for abandonment and anonymity
is this instinct pre="trms">dicting what ="ppl">Attar will ="trms">write='qstn'>? or explains ='strcls'>*why he ="trms">writes='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[="trms">writing as an act of ="trms">memory and perform='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

the mystic event is predicted by an instinct for abandonment and anonymity,
at the same time it mutates the ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban environment in which it ="trms">stage its runaways line.
the cityscape is cast into the frenetic rush of this disavowal, to the extent th[...]