[...]e transformed
='lgc'>[="trms">stories of o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginary ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion and com="trms">position of body='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> the form and function are having too tight fit. no no no!
(cities) being in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusive but not ="trms">integrative

(setar ="trms">different ="trms">technique of vibrato and ="trms">measure for instance in Saba and Ghavami, which part of the finger or body, one works in certain way for one and not for the other musician ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> the explicit unpacking of the activity ='lgc'>: what was formerly tacit ='lgc'>[zemni, khamush, ='lgc'>=/= habit='lgc'>] becomes dr="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edged into explicit ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= expressive='lgc'>] consciousness, precisely because there is a resistance, that there is something not ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right for the musician ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> reconsidering, reexploring ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> the ="trms">technique then again disappears into the tacit realm ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ="trms">technique becomes variegated)
='strcls'>**tacit ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> explicit (='lgc'>~= that which becomes available for reconsideration)='strcls'>**

when one masters a ="trms">skill it is about being ="trms">="trms">equipped to address a whole new set of problems
='lgc'>{expertise/mastery='lgc'>: problem solving='lgc'>}='lgc'>=/=='lgc'>{="trms">craft='lgc'>: problem finding='lgc'>}='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> when other things become problematic='lgc'>='lgc'>---the condition (in the ="trms">craft work) that when you learn how to do one thing you see other things that need to be explored ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-> ="trms">question for ="frds scrmbld">Eunkyung's drawing ="trms">skills and practice='lgc'>]

='strcls'>*="trms">craft is more important than art(='qstn'>?) (="ppl">Sennett)
...='thdf'>the notion that the work art breaks the conventions of practice, that it is something that makes an ="trms">epistemic break. ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> emphasis on innovation (something new)='lgc'>--that is a reflection of ="trms">sort of 19th century bourgeois ideas of about making art.
="lsts lst1">•privileging the creative act over the ="trms">craftsman act
="lsts lst1">•in innovation the “innovator” is separated from the “mass” ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">craftsmanship is collective and additive ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> (in ="trms">craftsmanship) the performance is myself
="lsts lst1">•creativity being a form of individuation or separation (='at'>@the exploratory shift in ="frds scrmbld">Eunkyung's work that ="frds scrmbld">Pierre highlighted)

='strcls'>*** ="trms">craft-work is about additive ="trms">skill; it is about building on what you know rather than throwing it out ='strcls'>*** (='lgc'>=/= capita="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list logic of progress, creativity in the sense that ‘something’ where before was ‘nothing’) ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> a ="trms">different way of building quality (into practices and objects)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Bakhtin's dialogic, to become a ="trms">skilled ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listener ='lgc'>: ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening='lgc'> = ="trms">response (='lgc'>=/= simply answering) ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> (when we speak) we give other people talismans that are not (perfectly) clear to us='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>----we penetrate and unpack what someone doesn't have the words clearly and ="trms">response to what they intend ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> “common understanding,” “make something work,”

cooperation is about getting deeper into something

conditions that more ="trms">skills are required (and not the op="trms">posite)

in ="trms">modernity everything seams to need to be ="trms">verbalized. what happens to the un="trms">verbalized, the unprogrammatic='qstn'>? ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> can you have an implicit ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right which can't be ="trms">verbalized='qstn'>? maybe no, maybe this is the limit of the ="trms">social...

purposiveness='lgc'>: when you hear somebody go “i am going to put clearly what we all want...” you have submitted to that person (almost ="trms">erotic) ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> “they really know who they are” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> you become a ="trms">spectator to their de="trms">finiteness

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

who the fuck='lgc'> = theology
how the fuck='lgc'> = ="trms">="trms">empiricism
what the fuck='lgc'> = ="trms">ontology
how the what the fuck='lgc'> = ="trms">epistemology
why what the fuck='lgc'> = ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics
why the fuck='lgc'> = ethics
why give a fuck='lgc'> = teleology
the fuck itself='lgc'> = ="trms">phenomenology
fucked up='lgc'> = pathology
fuck all='lgc'> = nihilism

="large lg14" stl="font-size:107%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="frds scrmbld">Aela to ="frds scrmbld">Sven='lgc'>: “everytime you disappoint me you gain in depth” (5 April 2017)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(06.04.2017) ='prcnt'>%notes after my ="nms">apass endweek ="trms">presentation='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•my implicit focus and energy on the body and its organs of ="trms">gesture that animates us
="lsts lst1">•="trms">loving telling you what i ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read
="lsts lst1">•giving you what i don't fully understand ='lgc'>=/= gift from above
="lsts lst1">•(in ="trms">lecture) to allow ="trms">language ="trms">greet the un="trms">verbalized

(it is about) organizing my ="trms">memory
(it is about) that which comes to (my) mind, and “things” coming to minds
(it is about) the things I am told
__='lgc'>[these are perhaps other names of cognition, ="trms">affect, ="trms">memory, ="trms">semiotics, ="trms">history, in="trms">heritance, ="trms">figuration, ="trms">interface, thing-="trms">relations, huntology,='lgc'>]
__in our shared space where we let eachother in the effect of our ="trms">languages, I want to practice what comes to mind when I stand in front of you and your work, ask myself ‘what else’ comes to mind='qstn'>? in a sense, my project on ="nms">ajayeb is that kind of training

also in ="nms">apass i want “to catch you in your acts”
it is my privilege to recognize you (as...)

asking='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1- what do I know='qstn'>?
="lstsrd">2- what am I told='qstn'>?
="lstsrd">3- (how getting good at to) explain what somebody else said

="lstsrd">1- the first ="trms">question has no clear answer, what i know is not placed somewhere in me, it is always an ="trms">articulated ="trms">matter of ‘with’ or in ="trms">interaction with, it is a ="trms">sym, changes before i can grasp, knowing is done always with a figure or a thing, it in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes all ="trms">sorts of optics and ="trms">technologies, (="trms">affect theory, media theory, ="trms">epistemology,)
="lstsrd">2- the ="trms">response to the second ="trms">question is also not clear, i am not sure what i am told, i don't re="trms">member or hear, what i am told is in="trms">folded in what i know, (when i started with my islam ="trms">lecture series i was testing the waters of these two ="trms">questions and the possibility of staying with them without freaking out of ambiguity or ploting an answer)
3='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ='at'>#cat's cradle


='at'>#on hypertext note='lgc'>:
i am becoming ="trms">skilled at looking at my notes='lgc'>:
='lgc'>{(1) what are the ='strcls'>*="trms">skills necessary='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= tabula rasa (of the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader, of the audience) of the ="trms">communo-capitalism's standard of “user-="trms">interface"='lgc'>--the strange idea that the ="trms">interaction and ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading doesn't need or must not need learned-efforts or ="trms">skills, that it should be “easy” and “effortless” ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> fallacy of the un="trms">skilled ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listener.='lgc'>] to engage, ="trms">interact, and get involved with the ="trms">interface, ="trms">data-set, grammar, and ="trms">literacy of (my) reservoir='qstn'>? ='lgc'>}='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ='strcls'>** let's ask that ="trms">question with every ="trms">apparatus that engages us into desire, movement, ="trms">articulation, ...
="trms">skills ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> to become ‘="trms">literate’ in this particular way ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ="trms">situated knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes this ="trms">situated ="trms">literacy and ="trms">skills of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading particular to the object of “text” (in that case how do i address my ="trms">interest in the ="trms">pervert ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader='qstn'>? the ="trms">skills of the unlearning='strcls'>*)
the ="trms">skills necessary for ='mywrk'>my work to work comes with time, attention, and desire ='lgc'>~-='lgc'>=>='qstn'>? ='at'>#="nms">harem (='lgc'>=/= ladies room)
='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> (2) this ="trms">skills of (my) reservoir, what set of ="trms">questions or problems ="trms">="trms">equip me to address='qstn'>?

varzidan, varz, varzide, ورزیده

="ppl">Sennett's ="trms">love for his subjects is extraordinary (='lgc'>=/= iconoclasm, futurism) and it influences me deeply, his voice and care when he opens his reflection, findings, etc.

ok, again, the ‘="trms">skill’ ="trms">question='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•1='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> what are the set of ="trms">skills needed for ='mywrk'>my work='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•2='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> which problematics these ="trms">skills ="trms">="trms">equip me to address='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•3='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> can i (or should i) not know these problematics in advance='qstn'>?

the bow and arrow ='lgc'>--|)='lgc'>-> ='heart'>♥ in my ="nms">apass endweek (as sound object) was a relic of our shared physical energetic space, the nondiscursive ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> how to keep it in="trms">articulate='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•a way to record space, which is always ="trms">social ='lgc'>=/= silenced with no ="trms">agency of the recorder (the “quiet recorder”)
="lsts lst1">•also a playful respective ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading of ="ppl">La Guin, (something that may seem a misunderstanding of her carrier bag theory)
="lsts lst1">•carving out a practice agility area


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

the ="trms">question ‘what does X mean='qstn'>?’ is always ‘what does X mean for you='qstn'>?’

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

i am following the movement of certain words here

spam ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">internet

spam operates on/with patterns of ="trms">literacy or an existing (in)sufficiencies in known ="trms">categories of cognitive biases that people have

="large lg14" stl="font-size:130%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[title='lgc'>]
“it's your turn now to play”

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luisa on space,) (="trms">question of='lgc'>:) producing (your) ="trms">presence

="trms">material-discursive ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ="trms">semiotic-psychosis ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> her Wortsalad

(="ppl">Bocola > ="ppl">Kohut > Mondrian's bipolar structure='lgc'>:)
creation of universal beauty / ="trms">aesthetic expression of oneself
(='lgc'>=='qstn'>?='lgc'>=> transcend the framework of artistic production)
exhibitionist pole of the self / idealized pole of the self
the grandiose self / the idealized structures
="trms">worldviews / self-images

what is the (diametric, dialectical) ="trms">internal drama of her thinking and work='qstn'>?
(what are='qstn'>?) ="frds scrmbld">Luisa's overarching, idealized conception that lays claim to the validity of her values and standards as applied not only to herself and environment but to the entire universe='lgc'>: (="trms">question of structure)
="lsts lst1">•(pre-babylonian) universal abstractionism ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ="trms">embodied knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="lsts lst1">•fluid equilibrium ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> movement of Being
='lgc'>[is this a romantic structural attitude='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-and how is she confronted with ="trms">cosmos ="trms">prior to her inscriptions='qstn'>? (="trms">question of realism)
="prgrph">-what is (the mystery of) a ‘being through ="trms">interpretation’ for her='qstn'>? (="trms">question of performativity)

='lgc'>[rea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic:='lgc'>] to take possession of essential aspects of the external reality (='lgc'>~='lgc'>-> recreate them in the ="trms">imagination) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ="trms">="trms">empirical='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[structural:='lgc'>] to experience the external reality as parts of an ="trms">interconnected and comprehensive whole
='lgc'>[idea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic/="trms">symbo="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list:='lgc'>] to connect the (inner) particular to the general
='lgc'>[romantic:='lgc'>] to make (inner) invisible visible

="trms">sublimated gratification of instincts, ambitions and ideals, (homogeneous) ="trms">gestalt and expression of the self, ="trms">narcissistic equilibrium, test its viability, haptic art,

“invisible reality and the ="trms">aesthetics of universality” or a mean by which universal is recognized='strcls'>*
timelessness, wholesomeness, indivisibility, ="trms">aesthetic standards
="prgrph">-pictorial thinking, movement thinking, ="trms">affectual thinking, ='lgc'>{='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> all issued by ='thdf'>the notion of “pure” and “purity”='qstn'>? tendency toward idealization='qstn'>? utopian='qstn'>?='lgc'>}

movement (the act) ='lgc'>=/= mobility (the possibility)

(is ="frds scrmbld">Luisa ="trms">interested in='qstn'>?) the immanent laws and essential unity of all being

...step to complete nonobjectivity
...objects with their expression of plasticity
="prgrph">-what is the ="trms">symbolic term in her work='qstn'>?
she said='lgc'>: “space is ="trms">literal.” ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> the wholesome is proclaimed in the artistic act itself (and not as ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor) ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> experienced directly ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">imagined


='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> احشايى the ="trms">viscera (ahsha), ="trms">visceral theory='lgc'>: ="trms">affect and ="trms">embodiment, transmissible physical charges, porous bodies,
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luisa
kP_AfO7Ms4I

how to create a condition in which she can herself later give access to her thinking and making='qstn'>?
="lstsrd">1- propose a curatorial ="trms">gesture of an assembly='lgc'>: ="frds scrmbld">Luisa, Mondrian, Zen master, Malevich; with ="ppl">Bocola and ="ppl">Ahmed;
="lstsrd">2- to open an investigation of ="trms">affective economies for her='lgc'>: abstraction, constructivism, idealism, ="trms">figurative empathy, ="trms">symbolism, longing,
="lstsrd">3-
="lstsrd">4-

(psychoanalysis ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luisa='lgc'>] allows us to see that) ='strcls'>*emotionality involves movement='strcls'>*
as="trms">sociations whereby “feeling” take us across ="trms">different levels of signification, not all of which can be admitted in the ="trms">present. (='lgc'>+="ppl">Ahmed)
="prgrph">-emotions move back and forth (="trms">past as="trms">sociations, repression traces on ="trms">present) and sideways (sticky as="trms">sociations between figures and signs) ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> something as the cause of a feeling in someone ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> “involving ="trms">relationships of ='strcls'>*="trms">difference and displacement='strcls'>*='lgc'>{as the form or ="trms">language of the unconscious='lgc'>} without ="trms">positive value” ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ="trms">affective economies ='lgc'>-='lgc'>->='lgc'>{="trms">social, ="trms">material, psychic='lgc'>}

='lgc'>{ psychoanalysis='lgc'> = "absent ="trms">presence” of ="trms">historicity='lgc'>-='lgc'>->(sideways movement of feelings) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>==offers='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> a theory of emotion as economy='strcls'>***
="prgrph">-by economy, ="ppl">Ahmed means, like capital (is about the movement of commodities and money='strcls'>*), an effect of its circulation (='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ="frds scrmbld">Luisa)
="prgrph">-the subject is one nodal point in the economy ='lgc'>=/= subject as its o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin and destination

='strcls'>**the movement between signs converts into ="trms">affect
feeling ='lgc'><='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> fetish commodity

in ="ppl">Freudian model, the movement between objects is ="trms">intrapsychic ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> trace of how ="trms">histories remain alive in the ="trms">present='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>[regarding ="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">histories, ="trms">histories that “stick” and which does not need to be declared, ='at'>#fohshe heyuan/heyvan فحش حیوان/حیوون sideways movements...='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-(="nms">ajayeb's) ="trms">past ="trms">histories of naming

objects, the ="trms">author of emotions



(how) emotions align subjects

_“surfacing” of individual_

(="ppl">Ahmed sug="trms">gests that) emotions are not simply “within” nor “without” but that they create the very effect of the surfaces or boundaries of bodies and ="trms">worlds.

="trms">narrative='lgc'> = production of the ordinary


="lsts lst1">•(which crimes against persons become crimes against place='qstn'>? -‘us’-)
="lsts lst1">•“body of the nation”
="lsts lst1">•s="trms">cene of “our injury” (='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> also in ="nms">Iran='lgc'>: “our” ="trms">historical injury)
="lsts lst1">•(the fucking) ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right to defense ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ‘home’ itself becomes to be mobilized as a defense against terror, becomes transformed into the ="trms">symbolic space of the nation ='at'>#='lgc'>[='thdf'>example of when the approach (to/by objects) itself becomes a fetish object='strcls'>*='lgc'>] ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> “staying at home”='lgc'>: a form of mobilization ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ='gtrw'>go to three little pigs='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>---- “the constitution of open cultures involves the projection of what is closed ="trms">onto others, and hence the concealment of what is closed and contained ‘at home’” (="ppl">Ahmed ='heart'>♥) ='lgc'>{ouvrir le fermé, fermé le ouvert='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•alert citizens, amre be ma'ruf va nahye az monkar امر به معروف و نهی از منک ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta-="trms">ontology of tosiye توصیه
="lsts lst1">•suspicious others
="lsts lst1">•saving women from ="trms">religious fundamentalism
="lsts lst1">•negativity of latent (could-be-ness ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> opens up the power to detain, police pishgiri پلیس پیشگیری)


o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of bad feeling
threat to violate the pure bodies ='lgc'>[vulnerable and damaged bodies of the white woman and ="trms">child='lgc'>]

='strcls'>*="trms">affect is economic='strcls'>* ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> it circulates between signifiers in ="trms">relationships of ="trms">difference and displacement ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> they align subjects ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> effect of collective ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> (in Ahemd's economical model of emotions) they work to bind subjects together ='lgc'>: the nonresidence of emotions is what makes them “binding” ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> her notion of economy ='lgc'>=/= ='lgc'>{inside/outside model ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ="trms">positive residence of emotions='lgc'>: “I have an emotion” or “something makes me feel a certain way"='lgc'>}='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> “fear does not come from within the subject, nor does it reside in its object”
="prgrph">-(='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda's take on witness='lgc'>] alignment of the individual with the collective='lgc'>:) the accumulation of ="trms">affective value shapes the surfaces of bodies and ="trms">worlds; ="trms">affect generates the surfaces of collective bodies (='lgc'><='lgc'>==allows='lgc'>== not to locate ="trms">affect in a subject or object) ='lgc'>~~='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ='lgc'>[to initiate with ="frds scrmbld">Hoda an examination of the) ='strcls'>*mobility of bodies of subjects='strcls'>* (in the West or her regions ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">question of the mediatization of her emotional experiences='lgc'>}

='strcls'>*emotions ‘involve’ subjects and objects='strcls'>*

what constructs emotions as ="trms">positive or negative residence='qstn'>?

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]psychoanalysis='lgc'>: a theory of the subject as lacking ="trms">positive residence
(this ‘lack’ is commonly ="trms">articulated as the “unconscious”='lgc'>: in ="ppl">Freudian terms, where an ="trms">affective impulse is perceived but misconstructed, and which becomes attached to another idea. ='lgc'>[can i say that ='mywrk'>my work in ="nms">ajayeb, which i named it as ‘organizing my ="trms">memory, and also, that which comes to mind’ is all about this reconstruction of cognizeds and percepts='qstn'>? is that why i am having less and less unconsciousness in my daily life='qstn'>?!='lgc'>])
="prgrph">-cognizant agah آگاه
="prgrph">-in ="ppl">Freud's model of unconsciousness, the ="trms">affect itself is not repressed, rather, what is repressed is the idea to which the ="trms">affect was attached ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> displacement

(="ppl">Lacan's) subject='lgc'>: proper s="trms">cene of absence and loss='strcls'>*
a theory of the subject that the locus of the signifier settles ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> constitution of the subject as “settlement”

(='lgc'>[what is='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ="frds scrmbld">Eszter's ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right and will to keep looking for signs of ="trms">difference. ='lgc'>--when she was talking about idio="trms">syncrasies of her countries)
='strcls'>*='lgc'>[with ="frds scrmbld">Eszter's “the nation has suffered enough!"='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--="ppl">Lezra='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> politics in a sense is precisely concerned with what is or is not ='strcls'>*enough='strcls'>*
“it's enough!” ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> ='at'>#="trms">demand something or before which I make a claim. it is practical (even ="trms">technical) or is dealing with being practical
the haunting modifier of “enough”
the ='strcls'>*amount='strcls'>* of something (-of suffering in this case) ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- “That's enough coffee”
="prgrph">-we are dealing with ="trms">materiality and ="trms">measure
='lgc'>{has that anything to do with the enough of ="frds scrmbld">Ekaterina's “good-enough mothers”='qstn'>?='lgc'>}='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> true enough-ness for an effect to be achieved

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> model of emotion ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ="trms">materialization of bodies

(emotions construct) bodies as ‘enveloped’

in standard psychological model, fear ‘has’ an object
='strcls'>*(="ppl">Ahmed's) fear='lgc'>: “passing by” (='lgc'>=/= arriving) of the object, impossibility of containment of object

="trms">anxiety is an approach to objects ='lgc'>=/= fear is an object's approach

="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%"> in ="ppl">Freud='lgc'>: self is made by the fear of father


="ppl">Ahmed's model of ‘impact of fear’
fear does not leat to containment but an expansion ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-> his/her embrace of the ="trms">world
="lsts lst1">•being sealed into a body that take[...]