[...]anipulated with the goal of shaping emotions in the future


emotion and its ="trms">affects
="lsts lst1">•emotion ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> medicated and sustained
="lsts lst1">•="trms">affect (a very recent idea) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ephemeral instantaneously rises and dissipates (leaving residual effects)
='lgc'>}='lgc'><='lgc'>-- a heuristic device (="trms">difference) to highlight ="trms">different kinds of experiences, their perception and impact

="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> ="trms">affect is under inquiry in understand='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•customer culture
="lsts lst1">•entertainment industry
="lsts lst1">•
="lsts lst1">•(individual located in larger ="trms">communities)

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affect='lgc'>: ="trms">embodied thought ='lgc'>: culturally and corporealy informed cognition='lgc'> = thoughts ='lgc'>+ apprehension “i am involved”
='lgc'>[emotion='lgc'> = i am involved='lgc'>]

(Elias) arguments in favor of ="trms">affect (="trms">affect-culture)='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. (help us to understand) ="trms">relationship between ='strcls'>*(human) bodies, ="trms">nature, action='strcls'>*
="lstsrd">2. explains cooperative living, sacrifice, generosity, attachment, ="trms">affection (better than theories that focus on economics, politics, power)
="lstsrd">3. critical ="trms">apparatus for gaining knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge from human ="trms">interaction and ="trms">social movements ='lgc'>--understand='lgc'>='lgc'>--> future
(concept of) ="trms">affect ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> productive way of understanding human attitude and behavior

_____________
="trms">affect theory
="lsts lst1">•(Spinoza ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>) ="ppl">Deleuze's ethnology of bodily capacities ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="ppl">Massumi
="lsts lst1">•(="ppl">Darwin ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) Tomkins's psychobiology and ="trms">differential ="trms">affect ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="ppl">Sedgwick

Tomkins
basic ="trms">affect transcend culture
durable and ="trms">socially meaningful

="ppl">Deleuze
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affect='lgc'> = innateness ='lgc'>+ external stimuli, “entire, vital modulating field of myriad becomings across human and nonhuman”

Spinoza
“no one has yet determined what the body can do”
="lstsrd">1. the body's capacity is not determined by the body alone but that it is amplified and assisted by its external context
="lstsrd">2. even though we might not understand the videos ="trms">nature, we can comprehend how a ="trms">specific body functions in a particular ="trms">social context
="lsts lst1">•="trms">affectus ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the force of an ="trms">affecting body ='lgc'>=/=
="lsts lst1">•="trms">affectio ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> impact of an ="trms">affecting body on the one ="trms">affected (='lgc'>==generate='lgc'>='lgc'>==> bodily capacities)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affect='lgc'>: a ="trms">relational ="trms">phenomena that draws that draws together='lgc'>: a body ='lgc'>+ sentient aspects of the human being inhabiting it ='lgc'>+ ="trms">social context within which that person is embedded

="ppl">Massumi
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> self-professed ="trms">affect theorists)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affect='lgc'>: essentially bodily, pre-="trms">social (='lgc'>=/= a="trms">social), filled with motion, vibratory motion, resonation, a nonconscious (never-to-be-conscious) automatic remainder
="trms">visceral perception
precognitive ="trms">visceral moment (='lgc'>=/= physical reaction)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> think of ="trms">affect in virtual terms ='lgc'>{virtual='lgc'>: sphere of potential ='lgc'>+ emergent ='lgc'>+ indeterminate tendencies='lgc'>}
='strcls'>***conscious perception='lgc'> = ="trms">narration of ="trms">affect='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>[to perceive='lgc'> = to ="trms">narrate your ="trms">affects ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ='at'>#feedback of artwork='lgc'>: actualization of the ="trms">affective event (='qstn'>?can it in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clude the ="trms">excess of ="trms">affect, the virtual='qstn'>?), feedback='lgc'>: ="trms">narration of unconscious perception='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--="ppl">Massumi='lgc'>='lgc'>--> outside of this perception is the virtual domain (nonconscious automatic remainder, disconnected from meaning) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “="trms">affect is the whole ="trms">world” (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="ppl">Massumi's attraction to indeterminacy)
='lgc'>--="frds">Sina='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">affect='lgc'>: the deep ="trms">historical remainder (fossil) of a pre-civilizational (pre-="trms">social) open-ended togetherness (I-am-involved-ness)

Flatley
="trms">affect ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (nonvirtual) they come out unpre="trms">dictability in dreams and physical ="trms">symptoms
(="trms">interaction of) ="trms">affect ='lgc'>+ habit, belief, thought, ideas='lgc'> = emotion


="trms">neuropolitics='lgc'>: ="trms">neurobiological universals can pre="trms">dictively manifest themselves


article ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">book (more rewarded in the humanities)

...="trms">technical, ="trms">symbolic, ="trms">formula-filled ="trms">language of ="trms">scientific research


="large lg14" stl="font-size:112%"> antirationalism of turn to body in ="trms">affect theory ='lgc'>--Leys='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “the claim is that we human beings are corporeal creatures imbued with ="trms">subliminal ="trms">affective intensifies and resonances that so decisively influence it condition our political and other beliefs that that we ignore those ="trms">affective intensities or resonances at our peril='lgc'>--not only because doing so leads us to underestimate the political harm that the deliberate manipulation of our ="trms">affective lives can do but also because we will otherwise miss the='strcls'>*potential for ethical creativity='strcls'>* and transformation that ‘="trms">technologies of the self’ designed to work on our ="trms">embodied being can help bring about.”



enterprise of theorizing ="trms">affect ='lgc'>--Elias='lgc'>='lgc'>-->

(1) ideologically driven by an attempt to reverse an ="trms">imagined poststructura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list theoretical hegemony ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> conscious turn from rational ="trms">methods ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*asignifying transcendence='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-="ppl">Massumi's ="trms">affect='lgc'>: a="trms">social virtual potential (='lgc'>=/= actualizes) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">affect='lgc'>: unformed ='and'>& unstructured (potential='lgc'>: transmitable ='lgc'>+ ="trms">socially powerful) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= undefinable ='and'>& unknowable  ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= unanalyzable ='and'>& unpre="trms">dictable ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- not usable as a theoretical concept
="ppl">Massumi (moving away from ="trms">linguistic towards t) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">affect becomes ethereal abstraction (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">historical ="trms">materiality) removed from the grasp of critical assessment
feeling ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> personal ='and'>& biographical
emotions ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">social
="trms">affect ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> prepersonal (non-conscious experience of intensity)

(2) florid and convoluted use of ="trms">language ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> fail to eschew obfuscation (without it there is not so much to say)
="ppl">Massumi='lgc'>: “thought strikes like lightning, with sheering ="trms">ontogenic force. It is felt.” ='lgc'><='lgc'>--Elias='lgc'>-- meaningless ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor

='thdf'>the notion of precognitive ="trms">affective event
="lsts lst1">•do nothing to help one understand the ="trms">nature of conscious, felt, enacted emotion ='lgc'>+ its ="trms">social ramifications
="lsts lst1">•provides no rubric through which one can engage in comparative analysis (or informed discussion)



(Brennan) ="trms">affect='lgc'>: physiological in effect, ="trms">social in o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin

(Grossberg) ="trms">affect='lgc'>: to locate human beings in their environment (why ideology is only effective some of the time='qstn'>? quotidien='lgc'> = pleasure ='lgc'>+ ideology) ='strcls'>*it is in the ="trms">affect (="trms">affective life) that people struggle to care about something, find the energy to survive, enact their projects and possibilities='strcls'>*
ideology ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
="lsts lst1">•="trms">affective intensities
="lsts lst1">•="trms">affective investments

(Hennessey) ='strcls'>*="trms">affect-culture='lgc'>: trans="trms">mission of sensation and cognitive emotion through cultural practices='strcls'>* (="trms">materially shaped by ="trms">social ="trms">networks, circulating of natives, they work with ='and'>& against structured ="trms">relationships, can operate intuitively or oblique)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]sense='lgc'>: obvious knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> awareness of ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right ='and'>& wrong='lgc'>] (='lgc'>=/= cognitive or learned knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***meaning-making through sense ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ideology='strcls'>***

(Reddy) emotion='lgc'>: range of loosely connected thought ="trms">material ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when activated it exceeds attention's capacity to ="trms">translate it to action/talk
(emotive='lgc'>:) emotional regime='lgc'>: how public emotional acts and ='strcls'>*emotional standards='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to soup opera ="trms">integrating emotional eco="trms">system='lgc'>] help to shape the lives of individuals
="trms">affect='lgc'>: explain (="trms">historical) events that elude (political, economical) explanation

='strcls'>*emotion exists in its expression and description='strcls'>* (spoken, ="trms">written, bodily enacted, visually re="trms">presented, etc.)


...emotion of “i am scared” in an early ="trms">modern persian miniature painting



in pre="trms">modern texts
emotion is more prescriptive='lgc'>: how it should be enacted and experienced (='lgc'>=/= descriptive) emotion are evoked='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. through teleologically constructed sensory regime
="lstsrd">2. through reflective/contemplative practices

="lsts lst1">•kindi ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how colors and combinations could elicit ="trms">specific emotions
="lsts lst1">•haytham ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> visual factors that make up beauty
="lsts lst1">•farabi ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> impact of musical notes on human mood
="lsts lst1">•button ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Christianson">Christian texts ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">specific ways in which a worshipper was expected to react upon seeing an icon of relic (crying, rolling on the ground, rubbing, caressing, etc.)
="lsts lst2">◦biruni ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> if uneducated Muslims were ="trms">presented with a picture of prophet or ka'ba, their not in looking at the thing would bring them to kiss the picture or rub their cheeks against it and to roll themselves in the first before it


Leys's shame ='lgc'>=/= guilt
guilt='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. ="trms">mimetic='lgc'>: victim identifies with the aggressor ='lgc'>+ accepts the ="trms">situation by not distinguishing belief ='lgc'>=/= behavior ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*guilt='strcls'>*
="lstsrd">2. anti="trms">mimetic='lgc'>: victim identifies with fellow victims ='lgc'>+ might imitate the aggressor only as a survival mechanism ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> preserve a sense of self ='lgc'>+ keep the atrocities external to herself ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ‘victim ='lgc'>=/= perpetrator’ that can be held in ="trms">memory without losing one's sense of self and victimhood ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (awareness of being observed by others in one's abject state of victimhood ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>) ='strcls'>*shame='strcls'>*

Leys ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (problem of shift from guilt to) shame='lgc'>: deprives one from ="trms">agency and ="trms">responsibility


='lgc'>=/= muslim-majority ="trms">society (use of shame in critical ways)


='strcls'>**performative ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=/& constructed ="trms">nature of emotions='strcls'>**

="prgrph">-in my youth in ="nms">iran (middle class) the context of singing together آواز in small gatherings was a context of expressing emotions within groups (a form of ='strcls'>*="trms">networked living='strcls'>*) that give voice to ="trms">specific emotion (grief, sadness, ="trms">love, heartache, etc.)
='lgc'>[i always felt outside of it='lgc'>]

public expression of feelings ='lgc'>--as="trms">sociate='lgc'>='lgc'>--> weakness ='and'>& sexuality
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> everyday life denial of emotions (of jealousy, desire, heartache)

(="trms">sociologically)
='strcls'>*something is performed='lgc'> = something cannot be addressed informally='strcls'>* ='lgc'>}='lgc'><='lgc'>-- for example emotions


sharm
sharmamdegi
haya
aberu
gheirat
nang
namus
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> emotion words for honor and shame (shared between pakistan and ="nms">iran, used with meanings that overlap and inconsistent)

honor selfsubsistent male
honor related to women
notions of virtue
notions of shyness

gheirat غیرت ='lgc'>: an emotional alarm ="trms">system ='lgc'>[for one's personal image (aberu آبرو), family, ="trms">religion, country='lgc'>]
gheirat ="trms">specifies one's appropriate reactions to the particular acts of the other ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in the form of emotions='lgc'>: ="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger, hatred, jealousy


(Elias’ problematic and useful de="trms">finition of) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affect='lgc'>: perceivable ="trms">measurable describable effect of emotional events and experiences, what is felt ='lgc'>+ what is emoted at an individual and collective level, (enacted ='lgc'>+ perceived) ‘happening’ of the human experience (='lgc'>=/= undefined protoevent)
="trms">affect='lgc'>: a way in which one knows an experience is occurring ='lgc'>+ a way in which one reacts to an experience ='lgc'>==shape='lgc'>='lgc'>==> future human experience

="lstsrd">1. enactment (performativity) of emotion is inseparable from its experience
="lstsrd">2. emotions, enjoying words, emotion events cannot be comprehended apart from the ="trms">sociopolitical context in which they occur (emotion act ='lgc'>~/='qstn'>?= emotion evoked)

somatic activity (crying) ='lgc'>==make='lgc'>='lgc'>==> emotions (sadness)

(in islam) happiness ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> virtue
(robust genre of ="trms">literature) marvels and ="trms">bestiary ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">wonder at ="trms">natural ='and'>& manufactured ="trms">wonders of the ="trms">world (pyramids ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= mortality) “='lgc'>==encourage='lgc'>='lgc'>==>” contemplation of God's creative powers

(in sufism) tension between good and bad feelings (ugly, outlaw emotions...) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> progress (spiritual advancement)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (sufi) scandalous behavior='lgc'>: performative form of cultivating negative emotions in oneself and others

emotional regime
="trms">ecological ="trms">phenomenology
emotional habitus

habitus='lgc'> = ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]mood='lgc'>: collective feeling ='lgc'>--="ppl">Bourdieu='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*making and using moods have to be ="trms">integral part of (the goal of) any ="trms">sociopolitical process='strcls'>* (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Foad, ='at'>@="frds">Sina)
(='strcls'>**collective action if impossible if people are not in the mood='strcls'>**)


='strcls'>*educational ="trms">material (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ideological ="trms">material) ='lgc'>: ="trms">integrated attitude toward the ="trms">world='strcls'>*

regulatory forces of ="trms">society construct (='lgc'>=/= control) behavior
='lgc'>[two feelings='lgc'>: you are ='strcls'>*constructed='strcls'>* but still might find yourself with ="trms">agency ='lgc'>=/= you are o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal (essential, special) and might find yourself ='strcls'>*controlled='strcls'>* by forces of ="trms">society ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- bad idea for political engagement='lgc'>]

='strcls'>**politics ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a sphere that is deeply imbricated in the visual regimes of ="trms">societies='strcls'>** (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for me ='thdf'>that is why visual arts are so important='lgc'>: politics is always visual)
='strcls'>**politics ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">affect can explain the processes that are inexplicable through other functional explanations ='lgc'>+ ="trms">affect exists as an object of power (political formations are reactive to and formed by ="trms">affect)

="brkr">
(="ppl">Naveeda ="ppl">Khan)

Jinns and ="trms">children

a place for a ="trms">child to build conviviality / continuity with a creature made of smokeless fire

(the girl) she charts through a modality of “hearing”

..that which defines the normative, the duties, and ="trms">responsibilities that accompany observance of a ="trms">religious tradition.

="trms">different intensities by which the normative is reiterated

Jinns are also known to eavesdrop (esteragh-e sam’) on the angels in the lower reaches of heaven to acquire limited knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of the future

the little mischievous spirits (nafs) that make up a self



='strcls'>**="trms">wonders of ="trms">children

="trms">children are born free of sin and have the ability to ="trms">communicate without reason (aghl) and therefore carry the threat of being easily led astray


8 year-old Maryam, channeling ="trms">communication between the jinn and her family
a time that she would look into the palms of her hand (to see what the jinn would have her see)
she ="trms">instructed the jinn that he could enter her father's body, with his per="trms">mission, jinn wanted to taste human food

her father and brothers would ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen carefully to her descriptions
(="trms">authoritative figure of the father becomes the pupil of his little daughter hearing her words of advice)='lgc'>--alterity



“in the middle east, the ="trms">child is seen as the crucial generational link in the family unit, the key to its continuation, the living person that ties the ="trms">present to the ="trms">past and to the future” (Ferena 1005)

“in the indian case ...the ="trms">child is seen as al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready being full person in domains to which the mother does not have access” (="ppl">Veena Das 1989)


...healer or magician may utilize a ="trms">child to bring into ="trms">presence or ="trms">communicate with the spiritual being
(='strcls'>***the ="trms">presence of ="trms">child in Ma'rekeh-Giri معرکه گیری='qstn'>?='strcls'>***)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

ecstatic identifications with...


one could legitimately dream of the prophet, but one could never call him forth
both these paths escape jinn, having a dynamic if disruptive ="trms">presence within human ="trms">world, alongside the ="trms">presence of angels and saints

there can be no other experience of the prophet other than through the record of his words and deeds='qstn'>?='qstn'>?!!!



the daily struggle to ="trms">presence the prophet


علما olama ='lgc'>=/= بچه bache
face-to-face ='lgc'>=/= via-jinn

face-to-face learning from the olama (the ="trms">authoritative transmitters) versus a faceless and voiceless jinn with his ="trms">child serving as its ventriloquist (arusak gardan)

activating competing bodies of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge and sets of ="trms">relations
(in the hope that one of them will pay off)


insistence on a modicum ='lgc'>[minimum amount='lgc'>] of consistency

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

...enmeshed within a certain unintentional malevolence existing alongside generosity.
="prgrph">-malevolence is something that holds out the possibility of harm rather than actively intending it
="prgrph">-generosity is the willingness to concede to others rather than a nobility of character


(also the dilemma of introducing the jinn to your ="trms">child)
“exposing” his ="trms">children to their disruptive yet generative powers


‘exposure of ="trms">children to evil’
the innate resource of ="trms">children
(for Zezru) the ="trms">children are pure, they re="trms">present non-evil. they belong to shades. their innocence does not imply a state of passivity.


what regions of experience and expression the ="trms">child has access to='qstn'>?

innate resources of ="trms">children
Reynolds
="trms">children’s own resources are bolstered by the protection afforded by living and dead kin
a parent (or guardian), cannot know in advance what regions of experience and expression the ="trms">child has access to or what he or she is capable of

in Islam='lgc'>: ="trms">children are considered to have a certain strength and pre="trms">science that makes them effective as conduits to the ="trms">world of spirits ='lgc'>=/= innocent creatures to be protected
="lsts lst1">•="trms">children are free of ="trms">religious ="trms">obligations up to the age when they are seen as maturing
="lsts lst1">•protected by countercharms and exorcism only to an extent


a certain unintentional malevolence existing alongside generosity
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]malevolence='lgc'>: something that holds out the possibility of harm (='lgc'>=/= actively intending harm)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]generosity='lgc'>: the willingness to concede to others (='lgc'>=/= a nobility of character)
="trms">religious ="trms">differences ='lgc'>--="trms">materialized='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
="lsts lst1">•as a malevolent witch
="lsts lst1">•in a father’s potentially malevolent ="trms">instrumentalization of his daughter (bringing the jinn home)


parsayi پارسایی
='strcls'>*pious self='lgc'> = com="trms">position of a series of ='strcls'>*presubjective singularities='strcls'>* (standing alongside one another ='lgc'>[within a milieu comprising other such series/="trms">seriousnesses='lgc'>])
='lgc'>=/= self-contradictory subject arching toward resolution
='lgc'>=/= norm-bearing subject that has achieved coherence


(='strcls'>*presubjective singularities='strcls'>*)
let's explore how a self moves alone this series of singularities, what brings about movement, and where may it be tending ='lgc'>[wohin='lgc'>]

='lgc'>='lgc'>---="ppl">Naveeda='lgc'>='lgc'>--> presubjective singularities='lgc'>: ="trms">different versions of oneself that are not sharply distinguished from one another but are nonetheless distinct

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]subjectivity='lgc'>: whatever you do set yourself apart from others

Maryam's father, has moved from a version of himself that he knew to other versions of himself of which he did not have ="trms">prior knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge

his movement was toward the jinn and then away from them. so not in the series that constituted ‘him’, but also moved toward the series constituting the jinn. a zone of jinn becoming.
(or human becoming for the jinn)

allowing himself to be a multiplicity


“Our faith had become weak and our ="trms">obligatory worship was suffering.”


is Sulayman (the jinn) then the arc of a certain line of flight for Maryam='qstn'>?

friendship between a human (little sunni girl) and a nonhuman (jinn) ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- enabled ='and'>& nurtured by the possibilities of malevolence ='lgc'>+ generosity='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> movement within a field of negativity ='lgc'>==="ppl">Naveeda='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a means of gaining voice



artificiality of need in the everyday ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this view eclipses what is at stake in the everyday life, what jeopardized it ="trms">internally and externally

="large lg10" stl="font-size:132%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='strcls'>*the formation of selves within contemporary Muslim ="trms">societies='lgc'>:
(A) existence of multiple selves within an individual, which is context-dependent and ="trms">intersubjective. the individual may espouse ="trms">different self-re="trms">presentations at ="trms">different moments, these are not viewed as inconsistent to the illusion of wholeness (Ewing 1997)
(B) the subject acts on herself in such a way as to make the norm constitute her as pious self. this is a self that is generated through its particular emergence from and ="trms">interpenetration with, the norm. (Mahmood 2001)
(C) the self as the realm of presubjective possibilities. in ="ppl">Deleuze words “impersonal and pre-individual singularities” exists within a plane of immanence. “far from being individual or personal, singularities preside (take over and govern) over the genesis of individuals and persons; they are distributed in a ‘potential’ which admits neither Self not I, but which produces them by actualizing or realizing itself, although the figures of this actualization do not at all resemble the realized potential.” the actualizations are in link with his plane of immanence. (="ppl">Deleuze 1990)

a given individual moves between these qualities without necessarily ="trms">morphing into entirely ="trms">different selves ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***="trms">difference ="trms">internal to being='strcls'>***
(that ‘="trms">difference’ is ="trms">internal to being)



to betray the immediate norm (of this ="trms">society) (to ensure a continued ="trms">relationship with them)

but i am al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready moving to my next self



='strcls'>*ethics of ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening
(1) ="trms">gestures as cultural text (="ppl">Clifford ="ppl">="frds scrmbld">Geertz)
(2) ="trms">codes to crack the regulative mechanisms of a ="trms">society (="ppl">="frds scrmbld">Pierre ="ppl">Bourdieu)
(3) how thinking proceeds apace with ="trms">gestures, how ="trms">gestures gather thought, sounded and unsounded, and how voice is incorporative ='lgc'>[tending to incorporate or in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clude things='lgc'>] of these ="trms">gestures

(="ppl">Heidegger shows)
="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical ="trms">relation='lgc'>: think ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> speech
(only when one speaks, does he think='lgc'>--not the other way around)



temporality of ="trms">memory
(...it took them two years to re="trms">member to tell me this)



possession='lgc'>: is to be struck by any number of somatic illnesses or psychic effects of mysterious o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins (Bown 1993)



mytho="trms">poetic (registers of Qur'an)
mytho="trms">poetic registers of everyday life



Jinn can trick the humans into looking at a copy of them (and then change form or into formlessness)


the copies of time-honored practice of ="trms">embodying and transmitting the islamic tradition is now haunted by ='strcls'>*="trms">modern ="trms">anxieties='strcls'>*


Asb-e Imam-Hossein



it is in islamic tradition that being a muslim entails keeping up the illusory ="trms">nature of everyday life while also participating in it. (not ="trms">excessive withdrawal nor ="trms">excessive attachment)
='lgc'>[why isis breaks this='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[='not'>✕='lgc'>] ="trms">technologies of the “here and now”
='lgc'>[='not'>✕='lgc'>] ="trms">semiotic-tech of “elsewheres”
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
(separated in the ="trms">past, ='strcls'>*="trms">ontological ="trms">difference='strcls'>*, a ="trms">fiction) in West='lgc'>: (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>that is why ="ppl">="ppl">Latour ="trms">anthropologizes ="trms">modernism)
='strcls'>*='lgc'>[philosophy='lgc'>]='lgc'>--signals='lgc'>='lgc'>--> here (in Europe and West), selves
='strcls'>*='lgc'>[="trms">anthropology='lgc'>]='lgc'>--signals='lgc'>='lgc'>--> elsewhere, others ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a wannabe discourse on Others
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="trms">ontological ="trms">difference between ="trms">anthropology ='and'>& philosophy ='lgc'>[in their mode of immersion in the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical='lgc'>] is part of) colonial ="trms">community, a form of ‘negation’ ='lgc'>=/= my recent antagonism ='lgc'>[the way i am studying is for ='strcls'>*extension='strcls'>*='lgc'>{= extending but also standing in tension with, a lineage(='lgc'>=/= rupture)='lgc'>} rather than ='strcls'>*negation='strcls'>*='lgc'>]='lgc'>: since i got into ="ppl">Olearius, 2017, I am developing recently a philosphpical-genealogical antagonism. (in ="nms">Iran we are used to philosophy ="trms">naturally inhabiting the otherness of Europe, among others, we never see them as ="trms">anthropological objects, but they see us as such. ='strcls'>*we don't think ethnographically about Others='strcls'>*)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> my aim is to mix this while i am “here” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> i say life (also power and ethics) comes to attention ="trms">simultaneously ="trms">anthropologically and philosophically from elsewhere and here ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to reed something from the outside ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= reterritorialization (of concepts, ="trms">interests, ="trms">affects, percepts,)='lgc'>]='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when concepts are reterritorialized they illuminate the ="trms">world ="trms">differently


='strcls'>*we need better construction of ="trms">past for building truly decolonial ="trms">community='strcls'>* ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- is my antagonism needed for this='qstn'>?


="trms">anthropology='lgc'>: a mode of heightened attentiveness to life
(="ppl">Singh)

="ppl">="ppl">Foucault, ="ppl">Benjamin, ="ppl">Derrida, ="ppl">Deleuze ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a loss of ="trms">anthropologically generated theory

(more than once in a single day i find myself paused to ="trms">wonder at) how thought moves

(long-standing philosophical between) dialectical and nondialectical genealogies of thought
="prgrph">-to be drawn to nondialectical is not the negation of dialectical, it is a way of thinking about the “="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta"-physics (="ppl">Singh)

philosophy reconciders this='lgc'>: ‘concepts come more explicitly to the surface as impressions grow into thoughts’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> no! no!

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> how philosophy relates to and draws on nonphilosophy (is usually geographical='strcls'>*)

more ="trms">differences='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•geographical='lgc'>: western/non-western
="lsts lst1">•naional='lgc'>: indian/french
="lsts lst1">•subdisciplinary='lgc'>: analytic/continental

(="trms">trajectories of Derrica, a tradition of) negative transcendence='lgc'>: différance, an absence that transcends “a” and “not a” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= (="trms">trajectories of ="ppl">Deleuze, a tradition of) affirmative immanence, the self-="trms">differentiating intensities of “a”, com="trms">presence of “a"='lgc'>]

some ="ppl">Deleuzian terms='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•assemblages
="lsts lst1">•deterritorization
="lsts lst1">•becoming
="lsts lst1">•multiplicities
="lsts lst1">•="trms">excess
="lsts lst1">•="trms">schizophrenia (='lgc'>~ nondialectical thought, a nondialectical expression of ="trms">different polarities held together. use ‘split’ to create a philosophy, ='lgc'>[the ‘split’ ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphore is='lgc'>] an argument for the dynamism and temporality of the structure ='lgc'>=/= dialectical ="trms">historism and the ="ppl">Freudian unconscious) ='lgc'>-- ="trms">schizophrenia marks an unresolved, nondialectical tension
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> giving me a range of concepts with which to inhabit a plenitude of life ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we need to create/borrow/steal/appropriate a range of concepts with which to inhabit the plenitude of life (in ="nms">Tehran) that exceeds all the time. (that which the political consciousness of contemporary ="nms">Tehran fails to grasp.) ='strcls'>***between moments of (my) departure and return (to ="nms">Iran) lay a whole ="trms">world, full of life (and hope)='strcls'>***

="ppl">Deleuze's hostility to dialectics
“we will misunderstand the whole of ="ppl">Nietzsche's work if we do not see ‘against whom’ its principal concepts are directed”
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]dialectics='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1- ='thdf'>the idea of a power of the negative as a theoretical principle manifested in op="trms">position and contra="trms">diction
="lstsrd">2- the valorization of the “sad passions” as a practical principle ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “the unhappy consciousness is the subject of the who[...]