[...]d conception that lays claim to the validity of her values and standards as applied not only to herself and environment but to the entire universe='lgc'>: (="trms">question of structure)
="lsts lst1">•(pre-babylonian) universal abstractionism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">embodied knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="lsts lst1">•fluid equilibrium ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> movement of Being
='lgc'>[is this a romantic structural attitude='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-and how is she confronted with ="trms">cosmos ="trms">prior to her inscriptions='qstn'>? (="trms">question of realism)
="prgrph">-what is (the mystery of) a ‘being through ="trms">interpretation’ for her='qstn'>? (="trms">question of performativity)
='lgc'>[rea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic:='lgc'>] to take possession of essential aspects of the external reality (='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> recreate them in the ="trms">imagination) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">="trms">empirical='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[structural:='lgc'>] to experience the external reality as parts of an ="trms">interconnected and comprehensive whole
='lgc'>[idea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic/="trms">symbo="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list:='lgc'>] to connect the (inner) particular to the general
='lgc'>[romantic:='lgc'>] to make (inner) invisible visible
="trms">sublimated gratification of instincts, ambitions and ideals, (homogeneous) ="trms">gestalt and expression of the self, ="trms">narcissistic equilibrium, test its viability, haptic art,
="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%">
“invisible reality and the ="trms">aesthetics of universality” or a mean by which universal is recognized='strcls'>*
timelessness, wholesomeness, indivisibility, ="trms">aesthetic standards
="prgrph">-pictorial thinking, movement thinking, ="trms">affectual thinking, ='lgc'>{='lgc'>='lgc'>--> all issued by ='thdf'>the notion of “pure” and “purity”='qstn'>? tendency toward idealization='qstn'>? utopian='qstn'>?='lgc'>}
movement (the act) ='lgc'>=/= mobility (the possibility)
(is ="frds scrmbld">Luisa ="trms">interested in='qstn'>?) the immanent laws and essential unity of all being
...step to complete nonobjectivity
...objects with their expression of plasticity
="prgrph">-what is the ="trms">symbolic term in her work='qstn'>?
she said='lgc'>: “space is ="trms">literal.” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the wholesome is proclaimed in the artistic act itself (and not as ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> experienced directly ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">imagined
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> احشايى the ="trms">viscera (ahsha), ="trms">visceral theory='lgc'>: ="trms">affect and ="trms">embodiment, transmissible physical charges, porous bodies,
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luisa
kP_AfO7Ms4I
="large lg10" stl="font-size:128%">
how to create a condition in which she can herself later give access to her thinking and making='qstn'>?
="lstsrd">1- propose a curatorial ="trms">gesture of an assembly='lgc'>: ="frds scrmbld">Luisa, Mondrian, Zen master, Malevich; with ="ppl">Bocola and ="ppl">Ahmed;
="lstsrd">2- to open an investigation of ="trms">affective economies for her='lgc'>: abstraction, constructivism, idealism, ="trms">figurative empathy, ="trms">symbolism, longing,
="lstsrd">3-
="lstsrd">4-
(psychoanalysis ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luisa='lgc'>] allows us to see that) ='strcls'>*emotionality involves movement='strcls'>*
as="trms">sociations whereby “feeling” take us across ="trms">different levels of signification, not all of which can be admitted in the ="trms">present. (='lgc'>+="ppl">Ahmed)
="prgrph">-emotions move back and forth (="trms">past as="trms">sociations, repression traces on ="trms">present) and sideways (sticky as="trms">sociations between figures and signs) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> something as the cause of a feeling in someone ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “involving ="trms">relationships of ='strcls'>*="trms">difference and displacement='strcls'>*='lgc'>{as the form or ="trms">language of the unconscious='lgc'>} without ="trms">positive value” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">affective economies ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{="trms">social, ="trms">material, psychic='lgc'>}
='lgc'>{ psychoanalysis='lgc'> = "absent ="trms">presence” of ="trms">historicity='lgc'>='lgc'>-->(sideways movement of feelings) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>==offers='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a theory of emotion as economy='strcls'>***
="prgrph">-by economy, ="ppl">Ahmed means, like capital (is about the movement of commodities and money='strcls'>*), an effect of its circulation (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Luisa)
="prgrph">-the subject is one nodal point in the economy ='lgc'>=/= subject as its o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin and destination
='strcls'>**the movement between signs converts into ="trms">affect
feeling ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> fetish commodity
in ="ppl">Freudian model, the movement between objects is ="trms">intrapsychic ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> trace of how ="trms">histories remain alive in the ="trms">present='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>[regarding ="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">histories, ="trms">histories that “stick” and which does not need to be declared, ='at'>#fohshe heyuan/heyvan فحش حیوان/حیوون sideways movements...='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-(="nms">ajayeb's) ="trms">past ="trms">histories of naming
objects, the ="trms">author of emotions
(how) emotions align subjects
_“surfacing” of individual_
(="ppl">Ahmed sug="trms">gests that) emotions are not simply “within” nor “without” but that they create the very effect of the surfaces or boundaries of bodies and ="trms">worlds.
="trms">narrative='lgc'> = production of the ordinary
="large lg34" stl="font-size:125%">
="lsts lst1">•(which crimes against persons become crimes against place='qstn'>? -‘us’-)
="lsts lst1">•“body of the nation”
="lsts lst1">•s="trms">cene of “our injury” (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> also in ="nms">Iran='lgc'>: “our” ="trms">historical injury)
="lsts lst1">•(the fucking) ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right to defense ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘home’ itself becomes to be mobilized as a defense against terror, becomes transformed into the ="trms">symbolic space of the nation ='at'>#='lgc'>[='thdf'>example of when the approach (to/by objects) itself becomes a fetish object='strcls'>*='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “staying at home”='lgc'>: a form of mobilization ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to three little pigs='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>-- “the constitution of open cultures involves the projection of what is closed ="trms">onto others, and hence the concealment of what is closed and contained ‘at home’” (="ppl">Ahmed ='heart'>♥) ='lgc'>{ouvrir le fermé, fermé le ouvert='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•alert citizens, amre be ma'ruf va nahye az monkar امر به معروف و نهی از منک ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta-="trms">ontology of tosiye توصیه
="lsts lst1">•suspicious others
="lsts lst1">•saving women from ="trms">religious fundamentalism
="lsts lst1">•negativity of latent (could-be-ness ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> opens up the power to detain, police pishgiri پلیس پیشگیری)
o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of bad feeling
threat to violate the pure bodies ='lgc'>[vulnerable and damaged bodies of the white woman and ="trms">child='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*="trms">affect is economic='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> it circulates between signifiers in ="trms">relationships of ="trms">difference and displacement ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they align subjects ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> effect of collective ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (in Ahemd's economical model of emotions) they work to bind subjects together ='lgc'>: the nonresidence of emotions is what makes them “binding” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> her notion of economy ='lgc'>=/= ='lgc'>{inside/outside model ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">positive residence of emotions='lgc'>: “I have an emotion” or “something makes me feel a certain way"='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “fear does not come from within the subject, nor does it reside in its object”
="prgrph">-(='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda's take on witness='lgc'>] alignment of the individual with the collective='lgc'>:) the accumulation of ="trms">affective value shapes the surfaces of bodies and ="trms">worlds; ="trms">affect generates the surfaces of collective bodies (='lgc'><='lgc'>==allows='lgc'>== not to locate ="trms">affect in a subject or object) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[to initiate with ="frds scrmbld">Hoda an examination of the) ='strcls'>*mobility of bodies of subjects='strcls'>* (in the West or her regions ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">question of the mediatization of her emotional experiences='lgc'>}
='strcls'>*emotions ‘involve’ subjects and objects='strcls'>*
what constructs emotions as ="trms">positive or negative residence='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]psychoanalysis='lgc'>: a theory of the subject as lacking ="trms">positive residence
(this ‘lack’ is commonly ="trms">articulated as the “unconscious”='lgc'>: in ="ppl">Freudian terms, where an ="trms">affective impulse is perceived but misconstructed, and which becomes attached to another idea. ='lgc'>[can i say that ='mywrk'>my work in ="nms">ajayeb, which i named it as ‘organizing my ="trms">memory, and also, that which comes to mind’ is all about this reconstruction of cognizeds and percepts='qstn'>? is that why i am having less and less unconsciousness in my daily life='qstn'>?!='lgc'>])
="prgrph">-cognizant agah آگاه
="prgrph">-in ="ppl">Freud's model of unconsciousness, the ="trms">affect itself is not repressed, rather, what is repressed is the idea to which the ="trms">affect was attached ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> displacement
(="ppl">Lacan's) subject='lgc'>: proper s="trms">cene of absence and loss='strcls'>*
a theory of the subject that the locus of the signifier settles ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> constitution of the subject as “settlement”
="large lg10" stl="font-size:100%">
(='lgc'>[what is='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ="frds scrmbld">Eszter's ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right and will to keep looking for signs of ="trms">difference. ='lgc'>--when she was talking about idio="trms">syncrasies of her countries)
='strcls'>*='lgc'>[with ="frds scrmbld">Eszter's “the nation has suffered enough!"='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--="ppl">Lezra='lgc'>='lgc'>--> politics in a sense is precisely concerned with what is or is not ='strcls'>*enough='strcls'>*
“it's enough!” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'>#="trms">demand something or before which I make a claim. it is practical (even ="trms">technical) or is dealing with being practical
the haunting modifier of “enough”
the ='strcls'>*amount='strcls'>* of something (-of suffering in this case) ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- “That's enough coffee”
="prgrph">-we are dealing with ="trms">materiality and ="trms">measure
='lgc'>{has that anything to do with the enough of ="frds scrmbld">Ekaterina's “good-enough mothers”='qstn'>?='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> true enough-ness for an effect to be achieved
model of emotion ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">materialization of bodies
(emotions construct) bodies as ‘enveloped’
in standard psychological model, fear ‘has’ an object
='strcls'>*(="ppl">Ahmed's) fear='lgc'>: “passing by” (='lgc'>=/= arriving) of the object, impossibility of containment of object
="trms">anxiety is an approach to objects ='lgc'>=/= fear is an object's approach
in ="ppl">Freud='lgc'>: self is made by the fear of father
="ppl">Ahmed's model of ‘impact of fear’
fear does not leat to containment but an expansion ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> his/her embrace of the ="trms">world
="lsts lst1">•being sealed into a body that takes up less space!
='strcls'>**fear works to restrict some bodies through the movement or expansion of others='strcls'>** (="trms">interesting for ="frds scrmbld">Mona's work)
='lgc'>[structural possibility:='lgc'>] proximity of fear-object ='lgc'>--is='lgc'>='lgc'>--> possibility of future injury
impressions of coherence, “sticking together”
(that is perhaps why ="trms">dictionaries and ="trms">bestiaries are ="trms">interesting='lgc'>: because their elements do not “stick together” in the sense of an ="trms">affective economy ='lgc'>[of inquiry and ="trms">narrative='lgc'>] ='at'>#="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">lists)
="trms">ontology of insecurity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (naratives of) crisis ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “return” (to values) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> fetish
="prgrph">-production of crisis is crucial for insecurity
="prgrph">-declaration/announcement of ='strcls'>*crisis='strcls'>* ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reads the fact/figure/event and transforms is into a fetish object that then acquires a life of its own
="prgrph">-it must be presumed that things are not secure, in and of themselves, in order to justify the imperative to make things secure (again)='lgc'>='lgc'>-->(the word “again” in the ="trms">rhetoric of safty becomes itself the fetish object with its own life)
='lgc'>[security is bound up with “the not (me/us)"='lgc'>]
being invaded by inappropriate others ='lgc'>[in ="trms">histories of ="nms">Iranian modes of ="trms">intersubjectivity='lgc'>: ‘being invaded by the appropriate other’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? being of Tasavof, ='at'>#slave manifesto, let me know if you want me to kill your master.='lgc'>]
(in the 1999 film Matrix we see the image of the ‘strengthening the will’ of the human ="trms">community in the face of the nunhuman machine others='lgc'>: Matrix ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “us”)
(Matrix's) narative logic of an ="trms">internal strength being ="trms">posited as ="trms">responsible for recovery, survival, and moving forward of the human race. (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Maarten, displacements of weakness and strength)
values that garantee survival
="trms">technologies that garantee survival
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they become moral
those who____
speak (against) the “truth” of the ="trms">world, cause the “ruin” of the ="trms">world
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
say your name before talking
it's a Q and A, a ="trms">lecture
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> it is a violent day
asking for your name is intrusive enough, even before asking where you come from ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'>#estizah='lgc'>]
(learning from ="ppl">Heidegger='lgc'>:) abbreviation is al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready an effect of ="trms">technology
case of Germany specially
and persian san'at (صنعت ="trms">techniques and ="trms">technologies) of subject-making
="lsts lst1">•‘is’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> information ="trms">system
="lsts lst1">•‘ich’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> intangible cultural ="trms">heritage
='lgc'>[='at'>#contract, concerning modalities of being-with:='lgc'>] ="trms">anxiety, Sorge, (='lgc'>~ care='qstn'>?) is ='strcls'>*disclosive='strcls'>*, for ="ppl">Heidegger, is an ="trms">ontologically fundamental mood that opens you up to the possibility of understanding, ="trms">anxiety is the leading mood that allows understanding
(in ="ppl">Heidegger) ="trms">anxiety ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> understanding
(in ="trms">Farsi) negarani نگرانی ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> vision بینندگی ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> basirat بصیرت ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ta'amol تأمل (modalities of meditation and speculation)
(in psychoanalysis) ="trms">anxiety ='lgc'>=/= fear
(in capitalism) ="trms">anxiety ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> boredom ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> capital
(in settler white colonialism) ="trms">anxiety ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> safty
(in ="ppl">Ahmed) ="trms">anxiety ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> approach to objects
(in ="ppl">Ahmed) fear/="trms">anxiety ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> effect of “that which I am not”
(ghol قول, gharar قرار, gharardad قرارداد ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ that which is promised by the ghol='lgc'>], ghovate ghalb قوت قلب) contracts also come to reassure, otherwise we might be in the radically open space of psychosis.
='strcls'>***contracts, they disambiguate the space='strcls'>***
='lgc'>{='lgc'>+='lgc'>} (pointed out by ="ppl">Derrida='lgc'>:) “contract” is less terrorizing than assuming that there is something ="trms">natural that binds us... (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luisa) contract is a non-="trms">natural conventional object. (the textual ="trms">nature of contracts allows it to be ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read, ="trms">written, re="trms">written, reformatted and rearranged.)='prcnt'>%='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ontic ='and'>& ="trms">ontologic='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•what kinds of violations does the contract capaciously in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes in itself='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•there is nothing ="trms">natural about here and us being here. (spatiotemporally clock tells us not only what time it is, but also where and who we are='lgc'>: how “time-teller” is spatially architecturally phallically ="trms">positioned='lgc'>: in the center, on the top, wrapped around the body, and so on.)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='lgc'>[="nms">apass opening week 08.05.2017, (my ="trms">response to) what is “artistic research”='qstn'>?='lgc'>] artistic research is a fancy way of transforming your “weird feelings” about the ="trms">world into an “inquiry,” so to say, and at the same time resist to be faithful to standard accounts of what counts as a “="trms">serious knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge claim.” So it in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes a lot of messy thinking-feeling, ="trms">embodied practices, ="trms">affects, ="trms">poeticity, semi-="trms">scientific work, magic, ="trms">data collection, mutative ="trms">interpretative ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, forgetting things, detours, rituals, dead-ends, ="trms">writing under the influence of scarce foreign obscure philosophies, ="trms">literary ="trms">drugs, and boldly using ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors from ="trms">different disciplines of “study” that one can find. So, on the one hand, it is a term, invented to indicate a “fluid ="trms">modern personality” within a turn in humanity studies that opens up to ‘what an artist al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready knows’ or ‘what an artist is allowed not to know’ within their ="trms">specific ="trms">historically ="trms">situated set of tools. And, on the other hand, it indicates an important shift in the education of art, in which the attitude of the artist changes='lgc'>: instead of making things into a “resource” for artistic creation, rather making things into a “topic.” That means a whole new set of ="trms">relationalities and new forms of attention need to be learned and cultivated, which were ="trms">historically often absent in the education of art.
="prgrph">-i want to bring a circus inside ='lgc'>{='lgc'>='lgc'>--> within='lgc'>}
="prgrph">-my business still with ="trms">aesthetics (my own image) (="trms">narcissistic stuff...)
="prgrph">-to show up as a guy, castrated and very advanced (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> you can only come up castrated unless you are extremely advanced, ='at'>#="nms">harem stuff)
="prgrph">-i am trying to come forward with all the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigor and ="trms">rhetorics available to me
the death score
="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo correcting his proper name in my mouth. (sig="trms">nature='lgc'>: master of your name ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> master of your house)
="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo named his future projection='lgc'>: “Empathos="trms">cene”
='lgc'>[sometimes your name is the first doorkeeper (as in ="ppl">Kafka'a Turhüter)='lgc'>]
="frds scrmbld">Eszter's ‘what is there as an obstacle to the freedom of man (='qstn'>?)’ (="trms">question marked by me)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the spatial ="trms">gesture of the ‘stop’ (='at'>#="frds scrmbld">Selma)
="frds scrmbld">Maarten's version of confusion (stated by himself) is due to that='lgc'>: the messianic horizon is essentially confusing (='qstn'>?)
his auto="trms">poiesis and cognitions
="large lg10" stl="font-size:135%">
="frds scrmbld">Nicolas's notion of “leaking” has to do with marginal non-textual non-accounted-for moments that bleed in absolute non-contractual and non-appropriable event='qstn'>? (the so-called moment when we show things to each other)
="lsts lst1">•his ‘climate of creativity'='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>~_='lgc'>[what does ‘criticism’ mean for him='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•when he says “="trms">gesture,” is he accessing ‘="trms">gesture’ having an uncalculable ="trms">semiotic value ='lgc'>=/= ‘performance’ that can be ="trms">measured in economical terms='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[but, what kind of consequential work is ="trms">gesture doing='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
(="frds scrmbld">Nicolas's order of inquiry and discovery)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what is at stake is how do you locate the effects of your work. for ="frds scrmbld">Nicolas it is locate at the “sides” ='lgc'>[which is al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready problematically pre="trms">positioned outside of him='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--="ppl">Ahmed='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ab object can be ="trms">affective by virtue of its own ='strcls'>*location='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] and the ='strcls'>*timing='strcls'>* of its appearence)
='lgc'>[the ‘image of the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid’ in his ="trms">presentation='lgc'>]
="frds scrmbld">Kristien's chart='lgc'>:
="trms">questions ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">symptoms
answers ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> openings
="trms">past ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> diary
for ="frds scrmbld">="frds scrmbld">Lilia='lgc'>: ="trms">apparatus='lgc'> = score
for ="frds scrmbld">Eszter='lgc'>: ="trms">apparatus='lgc'> = preparation ='lgc'>{='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> everything depends on the ways we prepare='lgc'>}
for ="frds">Sina='lgc'>: ="trms">apparatus='lgc'> = (chaotic/strange) attractor
for ="frds scrmbld">Hoda='lgc'>: ="trms">apparatus='lgc'> = negative feelings
for
for
(other non-="ppl">Agambenian notions of ="trms">apparatus='lgc'>: ="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King's, ="ppl">="ppl">Barad's, ="ppl">Wark's)
='lgc'>[="ppl">Agamben still thinks of structure in ="ppl">Euclidian terms, pre-chaos theory and fractal ="trms">geometry of (non)equilibrium. thermal chaos and dynamic ="trms">system theory has changed the ways we think about global/local stabilities, discontinuities and noise. ="trms">sym="trms">poiesis is another one.='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-with ‘="trms">apparatus’ what is at stake='lgc'>: flow of energy, order, waste, transformation,
="frds scrmbld">Vladimir's tether on disambiguity
="frds scrmbld">Elen, adding her own wheels to the flow(s)
and putting a stick/spoke in a rolling wheel (of others='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>[her saboteur trends, چوب لای چرخ (='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? kharab-kari خراب کاری), what is chub lay-e charkh for her='qstn'>? vandalizing the discourse of others='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-the famous vandal of wikipedia with the recursive name “-on wheels” (Willy on Wheels, adding “on wheels” to the title of every single page, using the move function of Wikipedia='lgc'>: renaming the existing title ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> moved to another namespace, without changing the base title)
="prgrph">-like myself, her saboteurs are critically not ="trms">symbolic nor ontic, rather sometimes ="trms">epistemic, or better, ="trms">ontologic='lgc'>: they don't vandalize the “thing” itself, but the “="trms">nature of the properties” that constructs that thing for us
="prgrph">-rocket sculture (what does it mean for her='qstn'>?)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='lgc'>[the ="trms">question of inevitability of ="trms">anthropical view='lgc'>]
there is no final answer to a kind of ="trms">question but a lot of answers
through inhabiting a figure you are ="trms">crafting you find yourself addressing a set of problems
="trms">agency='lgc'>: liveliness of artifacts (='qstn'>?). there is some kind of liveliness that is both human and nonhuman
the kind of ="trms">sociality that joins two ="trms">categorically separate mode of ="trms">agencies, is a ="trms">sociality that constitutes both ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">interaction of humans and machines produced both ='lgc'>=/= unilateral action
(my whole point or ="trms">joke, with the bow and arrow was that the arrow of index finger does not move in one way.)
='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= another mode that comes to mind is when your intimacy making leads always to yourself, getting laid, ="trms">literally. that is when your concern becomes only you and someone, sexually ="trms">interested ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> economically, and you don't concern the ="trms">sociality of your people with each other. ='at'>#="trms">techno-capital singular subjectivity ='at'>@='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is super relevant for ="frds scrmbld">Sven, maybe='lgc'>: how one becomes ="trms">interested, invested, and ="trms">skillful in provoking ="trms">interesting ="trms">socialities for friends and peers='lgc'>--and not only for oneself='qstn'>? creating, inciting zones of connectivity='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-='lgc'>[it was not accidental that the ="trms">rhetoric of ="trms">drugs came up with ="frds scrmbld">="frds scrmbld">Lilia when I sug="trms">gested the attention to ="trms">anthropos ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what figures human and otherwise was for her the subject of ="trms">drug-induced ="trms">rhetoric of mind-alteration; (this is the ="trms">anthropos of the Enlightenment Europeans and classical Greece talking='lgc'>:) “in order to get rid of me you must take ="trms">drugs!” ='at'>#="trms">fable/_ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> being sober(='qstn'>?!), ="trms">anthropos becoming, human ="trms">nature, common sense, ="trms">="trms">empiricism and ="trms">interpretation are at stake here='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-='lgc'>[another thing was the label of “="trms">animal” that was passed around as a form of mock, instead of provocations for more conversation, I was stupefied. ='lgc'>--how can we go on together and not render each other commitments nonsense='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
“point of view” is an important ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor
='at'>#in ='mywrk'>my work in ="nms">apass i am working on descriptive practices ='lgc'>[="trms">poetics of ="trms">animal description, ="trms">histories of nonhuman inscription, etc.='lgc'>] to learn to name latent (and therefore emergent) ="trms">ontologies, to name ‘what we are doing in new ways,’ which are hard to name. (also refusing not to name the violences of others and yourself. to reckon the ="trms">nature and scope of the erasures we do in our works.) ='prcnt'>% why do you think that is important='qstn'>?
='at'>#and my shift of attention to peer's works is about that='lgc'>: our domain of practices must make claim on each other ='lgc'><='lgc'>== we inhabit ="trms">differences together (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> attention and work on='lgc'>:) ‘local ="trms">category abstractions’ (how do we talk and make each other feel our subjects of ="trms">interest in ="nms">apass for example) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the cumulative, as="trms">sociated and sensed) ="trms">routines, ="trms">gestures, and (="trms">inter)surfaces of our everyday life in ="nms">apass, as a group of rese="trms"nttrm="search">archers, that don't necessarily align ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">worlding comes from these things.
='lgc'>[attunement ='lgc'>=/= argument='lgc'>]
the name of the ="trms">world is “detail”
='strcls'>***="trms">translation (essentailly imperfect) is the very condition of signification ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">trope is the very condition of ="trms">language
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg10" stl="font-size:103%">
don't be docile bodies or innocent bystander, do what you have to do to constitute your courage
all i am saying is that='lgc'>: it is not clear what the destiny of art (or of anything) is
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
perhaps what i am trying to learn='lgc'>--with ="nms">apass, ="nms">ajayeb, ="trms">writing, ="nms">harem, etc='lgc'>--is to ask what do i need='lgc'>--which ="trms">skills, abilities, or ="trms">literacies='lgc'>--to become ="trms">="trms">equipped to share the experience of the habits of the ="trms">world (of ="nms">ajayeb) that i am discovering
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="frds scrmbld">Luisa='lgc'>: “the visual (side)effects of a ‘not being supported’”
effect ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> object ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> suport ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> object2 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> suport3 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> suport4 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ...
(at one point ="frds scrmbld">Marialena pulling away a support box ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="frds scrmbld">Luisa's cry sound side-effect of a ‘not being supported’)
="lsts lst1">•='qstn'>?how is it done for her='lgc'>: construction of in="trms">different objects
="lsts lst1">•which import function is ="trms">materializing her ‘objects’='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[public import='lgc'>]
I want my friends to become marvelous thinkers makers, I want them to ask ="trms">interesting ="trms">questions
="large lg10" stl="font-size:126%">
="frds scrmbld">Esta='lgc'>: “when we enter the ="trms">presentation we are rese="trms"nttrm="search">archers, we are not friends” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “neutrality” of encounter='lgc'>]
(but i want to explore new places in ='mywrk'>my work with the people who care for you)
(is this at all possible='qstn'>? to enter with friends a non-friend zone='qstn'>?)
in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion ='lgc'>=/= involvement
(in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion usually mistaken as ="trms">literally for physical in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion)
How ="frds scrmbld">Kobe's work can move from a “case-finder ="trms">agency” to a consequential work='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">storytellings for making consequential meanings='strcls'>*='lgc'>] that means='lgc'>: what does it mean to live in the consequences of the ="trms">relations one is enacting='qstn'>?
(when I look at my friends and peers in ="nms">apass, I can see and feel the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges they inhabit in their bodies and the living effects of their ="trms">languages. I re-figurally feel the figures they ="trms">embody and their objects whether they assist or resist states of transformation.)
ephemeral things become food
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="frds scrmbld">Esta, risking one's life
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda, ="frds scrmbld">Xiri,
='thdf'>the idea of “express its inner experience”
simulation of
="frds scrmbld">Xiri's sense of entitlement to accusation
='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo, ="trms">fiction of sharing
‘something tangible, like a meal’
something phantasmatically hooked up to libidinal openness, like a ="trms">drug
="large lg10" stl="font-size:121%">
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Elen, DUI='lgc'>: driving under influence, what are we on when they were driving her cars
DUI has become the pharmecy take on ="trms">drugs to take away and winning the ="trms">drug war
movement under influence, MUI
legelized use of motor activity
driving while impaired/driving while intoxicated (DWI)
drink-driving (UK)
driving risky (DR)
drunk driver (DD)
='thdf'>the notion of game and rule for ="frds scrmbld">Elen and ="frds scrmbld">Luisa and ="frds scrmbld">Eszter='lgc'>: it is until ages of 3 and 6 that ="trms">children must not play by rules, and only after that the concept of rule-based-games (such as sports) should be introduced to them. what does that say about our artistic environment when we talk rules or breaking rules='qstn'>?
i am becoming more ="trms">interested in the ‘rules’ that the artist (or non-artist) is proposing, and not my own ‘freedom’ in their work. what does it mean or do to become ="trms">interested in the ='strcls'>*freedom of others='strcls'>* and not yourself='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> paying attention to the most implicit rules of your game, that means i am paying attention to your freedom that has ="trms">articulated itself in the creative ="trms">gesture
instead of (the “how” of) “how do i show my ="trms">interested texts='qstn'>?” (which was proposed in ="frds scrmbld">Maarten's exhibition of ="trms">poems) i like to ask (the “what” of) “what requires ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='qstn'>?” (also ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sven) (my kill-joys in ="nms">apass ... am i being too ="trms">ontologic with everything='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> I am operating from the ="trms">position that understanding ="trms">materials, practices, and ="trms">interpretation implies ="trms">questioning ="trms">ontological assumption ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> challenge concepts)
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eszter='lgc'>: is there a notion of ‘="trms">natural’ embeded in her ‘compelled’='qstn'>? there is nothing ="trms">natural about us being here, there is nothing ="trms">natural about here
="lsts lst1">•cognitivism='lgc'>: (when talking of re="trms">presentation) a psychology of doing which emphasizes human cognition endowment enabling man to develop intellectually ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> classifications (are easy seen) as properties of mind ='lgc'>=/= classifications as ="trms">materials or ="trms">materially textured ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “a common way to hear people's experience of this ="trms">materiality is through ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors. So the generation of ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors is closely linked with the shift to texture.” (="ppl">="ppl">Bowker)
="lsts lst1">•behaviorism='lgc'>: a theory of doing that focuses on objectively observable behaviors and discounts independent activities of the minds involved in the doing
="large lg14" stl="font-size:133%">
='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? behavioral ="trms">intervention
(footnote on) behavior therapy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> breaking one's loops (of='lgc'>: reverie ='lgc'>[mind fleeing across se="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluded planes='lgc'>], reaction to stimuli ='lgc'>[overwhelmed by the speech of the others ='lgc'>~ ="trms">neurosis='lgc'>], distorted thinking ='lgc'>[overstressed emotional reasoning='lgc'>], , ,)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]behavior therapy='lgc'>: treatment of ="trms">neurotic ="trms">symptoms by training the patient's reactions to stimuli ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*cognitive restructuring='strcls'>* could help ="frds scrmbld">Eszter in her artwork='qstn'>? (to reestablish the ="trms">relationships between stimuli and ="trms">responses)
(="trms">techniques='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•counterconditioning
="lsts lst1">•punishment (operant conditioning)
="lsts lst1">•habituation
="lsts lst1">•functional analysis
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*behavior ="trms">intervention plans='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•automatic thought record
="lsts lst1">•
i can only guess (with cognitive therapy) at the ="trms">interior landscape of her reverie, her ="trms">internal reality (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= psyche) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> i am reminded by this again that knowing anyone's psyche is impossible, as in psychology is an impossible ="trms">science='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]cognitive therapy='lgc'>: identifying and changing unhelpful or inaccurate thinking, problematic behavior, and ='strcls'>*distressing emotional ="trms">responses='strcls'>*
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> learning to monitor thoughts (in three layers='lgc'>:)
="lstsrd">1. core belief ='lgc'>[deepest level of our thinking, underlying self-values and perceptions of the ="trms">world, have an absolute quality='lgc'>: “I am worthless.” “I am inadequate.” “if I fail, I am worthless.” “I am unsafe in the ="trms">world.” etc.='lgc'>]
="lstsrd">2. ="trms">intermediate beliefs ='lgc'>[expectations and assumptions, guidelines we follow, maintaining our ="trms">anxiety and depression='lgc'>: “Always look for d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger and expect it to be there.” “If I don't understand something perfectly, then I'm dumb.” etc.='lgc'>]
="lstsrd">3. automatic thoughts ='lgc'>[immediate thoughts that go through our mind in ="trms">response to a ="trms">situation, usually negative and un="trms">questioned='lgc'>: “She thinks I'm weird.” “I won't pass that test.” “This is too hard. I'll never understand this.” etc.='lgc'>]
types of automatic thoughts='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•evaluation (evaluative thoughts)
="lsts lst1">•coping strategies
="lsts lst1">•avoidance
="lsts lst1">•
='lgc'>[cognitive distortions='lgc'>]
typical mistakes in thinking='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*all or nothing='strcls'>* / all-or-none thinking (“If I'm not a total success, I'm a fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*catastrophizing='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> middle eastern fortune-telling, omen, foretell the future='lgc'>] ( “I'll be so upset, I won't be able to function at all.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*disqualifying the ="trms">positive='strcls'>* (="trms">positive experiences do not count='lgc'>: “I did that project well, but that doesn't mean I'm competent; I just got lucky.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*emotional reasoning='strcls'>* (“I know I do a lot of things okay at work, but I still feel like I'm a fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*labeling='strcls'>* (“I'm a loser.” “He's no good.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*magnification/minimization='strcls'>* (“Getting a mediocre evaluation proves how inadequate I am. Getting high marks doesn't mean I'm smart.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*mental filter='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[selective abstraction='lgc'>] (“Because I got one low rating on my evaluation it means I'm doing a lousy job.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*mind ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[="trms">narcissism='lgc'>] (believe to know what others are thinking='lgc'>: “He's thinking that I don't know the first thing about this project.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*over="trms">generalization='strcls'>* (“='lgc'>[Because I felt uncomfortable at the meeting='lgc'>] I don't have what it takes to make friends.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*personalization='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[="trms">narcissism='lgc'>] (believe others are behaving negatively because of you='lgc'>: “The repairman was curt to me because I did something wrong.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*should/must='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[imperatives='lgc'>] (having a fixed idea of how you or others should behave='lgc'>: “It's terrible that I made a mistake. I should always do my best.”)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*tunnel vision='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[cyclopean view='lgc'>] (“My son's teacher can't do anything ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right. He's critical and insensitive and lousy at teaching.”)
what is the most central belief about herself='qstn'>?
which experiences contributed to the development and maintenance of the her belief='qstn'>?
which ="trms">positive assumption helped her cope with the core belief='qstn'>?
what is the negative counterpart to this assumption='qstn'>?
which behaviors help her cope with the belief='qstn'>?
='strcls'>*basically there is often no evidence that the automatic thought is true
http://static1.squarespace.com/static/521a7b2ee4b0ee587906d191/t/5774531e03596e22f1d2c844/1467241246388/CBT='lgc'>+Case='lgc'>+Conference='lgc'>+Handouts-1.pdf
(a deep problem with behavior analysis is that it comes from the study of ="trms">animal learning in the 20th century... observing cats trying to escape from home-made puzzle boxes, and things like that)
(for ="frds scrmbld">Eszter='lgc'>:) complex ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= coherent (='lgc'>=/= ='strcls'>*contradictory='strcls'>*)
="frds scrmbld">Eszter could benefit from learning about collective behavior ="trms">sociology
/individual behavior is completely unpre="trms">dictable
/collective behavior is to a large extent pre="trms">dictable
="large lg30" stl="font-size:111%">
contagion ='lgc'>=/= convergence
(Kelile Demne='lgc'>: evil is convergent)
='strcls'>*contagion='lgc'>: crowds exert a hypnotic influence over their ="trms">members
='strcls'>*convergent='lgc'>: people who want to act in a certain way come together ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> crowd diffuse ="trms">responsibility but the behavior itself is claimed to o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginate within the individuals
='strcls'>*emergent-norm='lgc'>: people find themselves in a vague, ambiguous, confusing ="trms">situation ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> new norms “emerge” on the spot, which may be at odds with normal ="trms">social behavior
='strcls'>*value-added='lgc'>: release valve سوپاپ for built-up tension within ="trms">community
='strcls'>*complex adaptive ="trms">systems='lgc'>: auto="trms">poiesis or self-creation of patterns and new entities
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
(footnote on) personality disorder
deviating from ‘orders’ accepted by the individual's culture
="prgrph">-your distinguished and enduring behavioral and mental traits that differ from ="trms">social norms and expectations
it is in ="trms">relation to others ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cognition, emotiveness, ="trms">interpersonal functioning, impulse control ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> personal, ="trms">social, occupational disruption
egosyntonic personality disorders are most difficult to treat (such as='lgc'>: ="trms">narcissistic personality disorder, anorexia, gambling problem)
='strcls'>*egosyntonic='lgc'>: in harmony with the needs and goals of the ego ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> defences ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> maladaptive coping ="trms">skills ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> ="trms">anxiety, distress, depression='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*egodystonic='lgc'>: in conflict with the needs and goals of the ego, in conflict with a person's ideal self-image
obsessive-compulsive disorder ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> egodystonic
obsessive-compulsive personality disorder ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> egosyntonic
="ppl">Freud='lgc'>: psychic conflict arising when the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal lagging instincts come into conflict with the ego (or egosyntonic instincts) ='lgc'>[such as='lgc'>: erection problem ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> egodystonic='lgc'>]
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]personality disorder='lgc'>: (a type of psychological disorder generally defined by) the lack of insight into the disorder
borderline personality disorder ='lgc'>=/= shades of gray
(a view that sees) significances as unfair and uncaring (devaluation) or flawless (idealization)
(a standardized criteria of diagnosis since 1980) a certain class of ="trms">neurotics who, when in crisis, appeared to straddle the borderline into psychosis
fluctuation in identity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> chaotic identity (='lgc'>=/= chaotic ="trms">imagination)
='strcls'>*the most treatment-resistant personality type='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-75 percent in female patients
="prgrph">-related to neglect in ="trms">childhood
borderline personality disorder often comes with very smart people
borderline personality ='lgc'>+ high intelligence ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•parakandegi-e zehn پراکندگی ذهن sporadic and dispersed mind ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> hadaf jahat kushesh fa'aliat هدف جهت کوشش فعالیت having a target, direction, effort, activity
="lsts lst1">•going from one thing to another without consistency in life باری به هر جهت
borderline personality disorder ='lgc'>+ ="trms">narcissistic personality disorder ='lgc'>[seeing people from top to down='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> winning arguments by mixing ="trms">imagination and reality, saying everything they like to others
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (donya-e zehni) a mental ="trms">world in which ="trms">imagination and reality are not distinguish (='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> lying)
(a nontherapeutic approach) to turn the borderline into ="trms">storyteller='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•dis="trms">sociation ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> impossible as="trms">sociation
="lsts lst1">•disconnection as a state of consciousness ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> impossible connection
="lsts lst1">•lying as a feature ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">fabulation
="lsts lst1">•manipulative behavior ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">articulative
="lsts lst1">•="trms">demand ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> performance
="lsts lst1">•chaotic identity ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> chaotic ="trms">imagination
="lsts lst1">•ذهن پراکنده (sporadic mind) ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ذهن انحرافی (deviant mind)
="lsts lst1">•sensitivity (of thin or no psychological skin) ='lgc'>--into='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sensibility
="lsts lst1">•
a therapeutic approach to borderline personality='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•dialectical behavior therapy (='lgc'><='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>-- mindfulness)
="lsts lst1">•
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='prcnt'>%notes on ='at'>#workshop of ="trms">question (HWD)
="prgrph">-how come in my drawing class participancts couldn't even hold the pen
="prgrph">-participants lenzes couldn't focus, the words were in b="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lur and in disarray
="prgrph">-i had to stop free as="trms">sociations and ="trms">staggerings, and return to the task at hand
="prgrph">-it was like teaching a new ="trms">language
="prgrph">-i was trying to share my methorodlogy, ="trms">specificly. not a jam session
="prgrph">-is it neccesory or ="trms">interesting to learn eachother ="trms">methodlogies in order to get involved and engagned in eachother practices='qstn'>? maybe not ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> go back to re="trms">presentational tools ='lgc'>--are re="trms">presentational tools the best we have='qstn'>? or maybe, structurally we can't give workshop in ="nms">apass HWDs or endweeks, because participants are not there by free will that is usually mobilising them to look for and join a workshop that they are ="trms">interested in.
='prcnt'>%(am I='qstn'>?) ‘coming back with advices’ in ='mywrk'>my work ='lgc'>[='lgc'>[='at'>#="frds scrmbld">Esta='lgc'>]='lgc'>]
is it ="trms">interesting for me or ='mywrk'>my research to think about how we moved that plant around in the 4th floor='qstn'>?
='strcls'>*moving plants='strcls'>* is risky
as backdrop for human activity
passively vegetating
making local and global connections='lgc'>: which local or global connections was made (by ="frds">Sina, ="frds scrmbld">Xiri and ="frds scrmbld">Esta moving the plant)='qstn'>? (how the plant was re="trms">positioned in our) making of public common spaces
="prgrph">-practices of concern
(attentive to the plant that was a) shared “thing” between us
what was mediated, navigated and ="trms">articulated with that plant in ="nms">apass 4th floor='qstn'>?
(with this i am trying to ask about the) kinds of ="trms">imaginative ="trms">world-making at work
gathering forces
="prgrph">-
the mice, and the pattern of rice, how did we become the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader of mice's text='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader is always always constructed.
the mice disconnected us from global digital ="trms">networks and wrote something on the floor...
(which objects of our ="trms">systems design supporting some and not others) leaving out what are locally perceived as “nonpeople” can mean nonworking ="trms">system. (biologists not seeing their secretaries as doing real ="trms">science, artists in ="nms">apass not seeing the mice doing real work, etc.)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*(="ppl">Leigh ="ppl">="ppl">Star's) “ethnography of infrastructure”='strcls'>* -infrastructure is both ="trms">relational and ="trms">ecological, both transparent and opaque. it is part of the balance of action, tools, and the built environment. ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]infrastructure='lgc'>: a ="trms">dense ="trms">interwoven fabric of shared visions of possible and acceptable dreams (of the inovative, as ="trms">techniques, knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, know-how, and the institutions).
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
my previous ="trms">lectures have been ="trms">communicating something I don't quite understand to an audience that doesn't want to know. but still somehow they became not in="trms">different to my madness and we managed to establish lines of ="trms">interest and ="trms">interference (='lgc'>=/= restoring the phalus to its proper place, or getting a ="trms">membership)
i am building another wit ='lgc'>=/= you know when you are on some kind of auto-="trms">respond, those smart fast answers. my wits take ages to come through. in a way i have been slowing down certain kinds of wit. that's also why it is so easy to silence me.
i have been also busy with the timing of understanding. how to keep understanding open and ongoing='qstn'>? there is this standard general sense that becomes very upset when things are not immediately understood (='at'>#double-click democratization of ="trms">communication,) ='mywrk'>my workings have been perhaps invested in keeping my own (not-fully-)understood alive for a while. if things were instantly understandable we wouldn't be here.
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="trms">question at ="frds scrmbld">Hoda
how to make her ="trms">interested in ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics='qstn'>? in queer studies and practices
physics is the river of ="trms">phenomena
="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta='lgc'>: above, among, beyond
="trms">ontological commitment to='lgc'>:
sense of ="trms">wonder
sense of sadness
sense of madness
what (else) ="trms">literature can be if not elegy='qstn'>?
sonic level of sign-making and significance in her act
soft-spoken adjectives
“sigh”='lgc'>: ="trms">poetry's start-up engine, aaaahh
somewhere between lament and mourning
proper address of the mother
which ‘s="trms">cene of ="trms">modern or classical ="trms">language’ you are opening='qstn'>?
‘sigh’ is important, sigh initiates (many in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding german and ="nms">iranian) ="trms">literature
="nms">iranian ="trms">historical comfort zones
where ="trms">literature starts with sigh
when and how did you learn to sigh='qstn'>?
sigh is from the family of the specialized ="trms">languages of ="trms">complaining='qstn'>?
temporal climate of your re="trms">membrance (as mourning) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> related to the ="trms">past='qstn'>?
mourning and ="trms">memory are sojourn for her
incorporating the object of (her) loss
(holding ="trms">onto) the unhappy objects of ="trms">difference
="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger, pain, misery, ...
which (good or bad) feelings saturates her ="trms">poem='qstn'>?
="trms">question of saturation
which feelings modified by which ="trms">poetics sutures which wounds='qstn'>? زخمبندی
or to be more psychoanalytically correct='lgc'>: where is the wound='qstn'>?
my own affirmative exposure of the unhappy effects of her ="trms">poetry
what is the image of the ‘better life’ in her ="trms">poetry='qstn'>?
somehow in the ="trms">literary habitus she is moving, the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of descriptive/inscriptive saying is made by an initial violation
="frds scrmbld">Hoda's ="trms">poem, which energies does it unleash in her='qstn'>?
sokhan-e ranj سخن رنج
شعر غنایی Lyric ="trms">poetry, a formal type of ="trms">poetry which is defined by or dedicated to expressing so-called personal emotions or feelings.
the Lyre, a string ="trms">instrument in ="trms">Greek classical antiquity, is tuning the ="trms">technicality of this ‘form’
="trms">historical ="trms">contingencies of “personal feelings”
='qstn'>?what is more singular than your “personal” highs, trips, crashes, “feelings” ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a text telling about itself (its ownmost experience of something that is radically singular)
="prgrph">-="trms">rhetoric of singularity
="prgrph">-(my point is that the expression of your) innermost experience (is often signed by someone else)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “distributed biographies,” thinking about ="trms">sociality of perception
her ="trms">poem is her textual body (='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sexual body)
ecstasy
is subjectivity (permanently for ="frds scrmbld">Hoda) ecstatic='qstn'>?
this is the ="trms">question of ‘where is the subject’='qstn'>? ="trms">according to ="trms">different practices with ecstasy we are outside ourselves. (in ="trms">religion that is precisely where the ‘inside’ is located)
="prgrph">-permanent or structural ecstasy is clearly political
="prgrph">-ecstasy is disruptive
how much should I be invested or ="trms">interested as a friend for your happiness and wellbeing='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•fellow-feeling
="lsts lst1">•="trms">sympathy (is expressed by='lgc'>:) returning feeling with like feeling
="frds">Sina='lgc'>: if a thinking makes you sad, that thinking is probably wrong='qstn'>?
within the ="trms">rhetoric of ="trms">integration a usual terrifying point is in which the duty of the migrant is to attach to a ="trms">different, happier object
the future of reattachment ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Hoda
="prgrph">-in this ="trms">integrative ="trms">narrative, I have to be careful with assumptions that good feelings are open and bad feelings are closed
bad feelings are seen as orientated toward the ="trms">past ='lgc'>=/= ='mywrk'>my work on ="trms">past
she said “here is the English-one” meaning the English ="trms">translation of her ="trms">poem
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in the last five years i have been rifting between the difficult space between “here the ="trms">Farsi-one” and “here the English-one”
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='at'>#semester, seminar study the “s="trms">cene of ="trms">writing”
keywords='lgc'>: deconstruction, fabrication, ="trms">articulation, plasticity
='lgc'>[week 1,2,3='lgc'>] encounters between psychoanalysis, deconstruction, ="trms">writing, concepts of ="trms">language='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Derrida ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud / “="ppl">Freud ='and'>& the S="trms">cene of ="trms">Writing” (43 pages)
="lsts lst1">•Fleming ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Derrida / “Cultural Graphology ="trms">Writing After ="ppl">Derrida” (first chapter='lgc'>: The Psychopathology of ="trms">Writing, 29 pages)
="lsts lst1">•the schemas of text and the trace, Malabou on plasticity ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= elasticity='lgc'>] (change of the paradigm of ="trms">writing as developed in ="ppl">Derrida's Grammatology with the new paradigm of plasticity, her ="trms">interest in ="trms">relation between form, ="trms">materiality and meaning) / “Plasticity at the Dusk of ="trms">Writing” (28 pages)
='lgc'>[week 4='lgc'>] 20th century ="trms">sciences and philosophies, ='thdf'>the notion of fabrication of concepts='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•Xin Wei ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Whitehead / “="ppl">Whitehead's ="trms">Poetical Mathematics” (19 pages)
='lgc'>[week 5='lgc'>] on ="trms">articulation='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Deleuze and ="ppl">Guattari / “A Thousand Plateaus” (chapter 3='lgc'>: Double ="trms">Articulation, 32 pages)
='lgc'>[week 6='lgc'>] feminist and women studies, s="trms">cene of ="trms">writing='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">aesthetic tentacularity='lgc'>: Lindsay Kelley ='and'>& Eva ="ppl">="ppl">Hayward / “Carnal Light”
='lgc'>[week 7='lgc'>] digital media='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Flusser on hypertext / “Does ="trms">Writing Have a Future” (chapter='lgc'>: Supertext, 6 pages)
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Bolter / “="trms">Writing Space” (chapter 3 ="trms">Writing as ="trms">Technology, 13 pages)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='at'>#workshop little ="trms">fables of practice, second day ="trms">storytelling
(proposed initially to ="frds scrmbld">Lili='lgc'>:) ='at'>#="trms">imagine and describe an alien ="trms">world where its populace don't practice ‘knowing’
with this practice we get into ="trms">questions of (='lgc'>--without directly addressing/announcing them we will provoke a better understanding of what we might think of them='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•knowing ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the inseparability of) knowing, being, and doing
="lsts lst1">•the ‘="trms">suppos’ of the ="trms">supposed to know
="lsts lst1">•="trms">rhetorics, [...]