[...]= ="trms">contingency) ='lgc'>==> an ="trms">ecology of attention ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>***what can be forgotten and what should be re="trms">membered='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>==> development of (information) infrastructure
what is re="trms">membered in the formal information ="trms">systems ='lgc'>==> ="trms">ontology of that ="trms">system

...recorded on a form; and forms necessarily impose/="trms">naturalize classification ="trms">systems (through the form's speed, rhythm, dimension, and how its ="trms">specifications are implemented) ='strcls'>***
(how am i working this in my pop-up ="trms">book and hypertex='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> classification scheme of relevant events for ='mywrk'>my research)
='strcls'>*informational space is (sufficiently well) pre-structured ='lgc'>==> some things/details can be assumed or are dropped out of the re="trms">presentational space
="prgrph">-in my pop-up ="trms">book i am en="trms">coding a kind of ="trms">memory in an organizational file ='lgc'>==>='qstn'>? “potential ="trms">memory” (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= possible future reconstructions) ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- rejecting the ways in which ="trms">memory is structured in the organization named ="nms">Iran, or Middle East, or Germany, or Europe,
needed for development of potential ="trms">memory='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•(forms of) erasure of local context ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to some degree this is always done
="lsts lst1">•(forms of) classification ="trms">system ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> computerized, ="trms">affectual, or ="trms">materially textured ="trms">categories

='strcls'>* construction is always reconstruction ='strcls'>*

artificial ="trms">memory (characteristic of the 16th century='lgc'>:) “a search for the perfectly proportioned image containing the ‘soul’ of the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge to be re="trms">membered” ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> discovery of the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right logical ="trms">category ='lgc'>==> classifying the ="trms">memorization the ="trms">world ="trms">scientifically

classification ="trms">system ='lgc'>==> filter ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> en="trms">coding (of information about the environment) ='lgc'>==> coherent framework='lgc'> = ="trms">memory (Schachter, 1996)

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> ="ppl">="ppl">Bowker > Matsuda > Edouard Claparede's experiment (1907) of having a str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger rush into the classroom, do something outrageous, and then have students describe what happened ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “that the ="trms">past='lgc'>--even of a simple event='lgc'>--was less a record than a ="trms">sort of taxonomy. Not perceptions, but ="trms">categorization of familiar types was the major function of ="trms">memory”
='at'>#bambi

pigeonholing of facts

how ="nms">apass as an organizations is ="trms">coding for artistic research within the framework of their ="trms">memory ="trms">systems='qstn'>?

“There is no room on the ='lgc'>[filling='lgc'>] form to ="trms">write an essay on race identity politics.”

do we need to develop and standardize my discipline-="trms">specific nomenclature (in our research micro="trms">world) in order to name without ambiguity='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> rede="trms">finition of disciplinary boundaries ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> shaping of your work so that its future practice converges on potential ="trms">memory

we murder, they note
they draw from their secret='lgc'>[s='lgc'>]

infrastructure-thinking='lgc'>: Ajayeb ="trms">Network-Making Minimum ="trms">Data Set
in ="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">literature the very information infrastructure itself (should let be or) is in flux ='lgc'>==> discourses make strange connections between themselves
="prgrph">-in ="nms">ajayeb the infrastructure assumes the ="trms">position of every node ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> reworked in my ='at'>#="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">Rigs

“...we are afloat in a sea of multiple, fractured ="trms">causalities each ="trms">demanding their own classification ="trms">systems='lgc'>--and their own ="trms">apparatus of record collection.” (="ppl">="ppl">Bowker)

="large lg1" stl="font-size:138%"> classification (="trms">systems)='lgc'>: a warrant and a tool for forgetting, and operating the distribution of this forgetting (in space of ="trms">scientific ="trms">memory.)
it tells you what to forget (for example the ="trms">religious and ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical,) and how to forget it

='lgc'>[the formation (training) of artists covers up the formation (production) of artistic knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-the ="trms">social ="trms">story of ="trms">science is ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluded from the organization of the ="trms">sciences, and held outside of it ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">situated knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="prgrph">-a ="trms">natural hierarchy of ="trms">sciences is offered='lgc'>: every discipline needs to re="trms">member only a given set of facts ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> each type of ="trms">memory which has been distributed in space will also be sequenced in time (http://="nms">ajayeb.net/='qstn'>?q=imperative='lgc'>+of='lgc'>+knowing) ='lgc'>[='thdf'>for example mathematics ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> physics ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> chemistry ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> biology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">sociology='lgc'>] ='lgc'>==> formal ="trms">memory ="trms">system

the problem of the detective is that for him only those facts are relevant that hand him the solution of crime (='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> goal-oriented individual dis="trms">position) ='lgc'>=/= chasing rabbits
="prgrph">-the detective (has to) classify away traces='lgc'>: the ="trms">systematic and deliberate forgetting of some actions in order to better re="trms">member others
="prgrph">-what makes a ="trms">difference='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-in ="trms">sorting ="trms">animals which ="trms">past knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">ajayeb) are deliberatly forgotten in order to re="trms">member them as incorporated into an information infrastructure called ‘="trms">species’='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->! the classified are re="trms">membered (in the ="trms">techno="trms">science ="trms">world)

(what is the) complex ="trms">ecology of ="trms">memory practices (particular within ="nms">apass='qstn'>?)
="lsts lst1">•="frds scrmbld">Hoda ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> politics of re="trms">membrance
="lsts lst1">•="frds scrmbld">Zoumana ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">situated perspective
="lsts lst1">•="frds">Sina ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">narratable ="trms">past
="lsts lst1">•="frds scrmbld">Marialena ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> type of ="trms">language
="lsts lst1">•S

today, 18.07.2017, the ="nms">ajayeb's knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge can be stored and expressed in a quite restricted range of genres called myth, ancient, ="trms">imaginary,

______________


http://www.ics.uci.edu/='lgc'>~gbowker/records.html

we have learned from ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault that ="trms">different (medical) records, ="trms">different practices of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading and ="trms">writing are ="trms">intertwined with the production of ="trms">different patient's bodies, body politic, and bodies of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
='at'>@Olga

record is the ="trms">story of the organizational infrastructure ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Marialena, Olga='lgc'>]

='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Foucault on knowing in the practice of medicine:='lgc'>] cascade of inscriptions ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">writing ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> totality of observers/observations ='lgc'>==> “true knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge"='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">modern clinical gaze ='lgc'>==> pathological processes of individual bodies (='lgc'>=/= medicine of ="trms">species='lgc'>: individual ="trms">symptoms / medical knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, essential truth beneath the sensible individuality)

...a body which hides the essences of the disease ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> production of the organizations which enact and treat it

How is the patient (or choreographic) body's ="trms">specific ="trms">geometry and its ="trms">historicity created='qstn'>?
='strcls'>*body is produced through ="trms">embodied, ="trms">materially heterogeneous work

(="ppl">Foucauldian) dis="trms">positif='lgc'>: a ="trms">network within which the body acquires its ="trms">specific ="trms">ontology

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> (="ppl">="ppl">Latour < ="ppl">="ppl">Bowker='lgc'>:) the record ‘mediates’ the ="trms">relations that it organizes, the bodies that are configured through it

regarding record, we can be concerned with='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•practices of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading and ="trms">writing which bring the record to life
="lsts lst1">•mapping the con="trms">figurations the record helps bring into being

how the structuring of the record speaks to the structuring of the bodies (of the artists='qstn'>?) we investigate='qstn'>? (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sofia, Olga)

record ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{
production of human bodies
organizational hierarchies
selective ="trms">memories

="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%"> _________


Ribes ="ppl">="ppl">Bowker - Between Meaning and Machine.pdf

...in the wake of ="trms">ontologies
in participating in knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge projects, first we learn about ="trms">ontologies and then learned how to create them
(we rarely “produce” knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, we always participate)

="trms">ontology='lgc'>: an information ="trms">technology for re="trms">presenting specialized knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge in order to='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•facilitate ="trms">communication across disciplines
="lsts lst1">•share ="trms">data
="lsts lst1">•enable collaboration

="large lg5" stl="font-size:151%"> (am i) re="trms">presenting the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of my ="trms">communities (='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>-- what does that mean='qstn'>?

='strcls'>*="trms">routinization='strcls'>* (is that which is at stake in ="trms">ontologies) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*apprehension='strcls'>*='lgc'>: orientation to the informational organization of ones field
(to attend the ="trms">routinizations and apprehensions in one's own practice ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">ontology building)
="lsts lst1">•my ="trms">routines of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, highlighting, ="trms">writing, idio="trms">syncratic talks, feedbacks, ="trms">questions, silences,
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (attend to the) transformative consequences of learning and ="trms">traversing ="trms">routines ='lgc'>--='lgc'>[='lgc'>+='lgc'>]='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the practice and ="trms">material tools that accompany the reworking of them ='lgc'>{knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge in informational terms, ="trms">fables, etc.='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> problematic of ="trms">inter-operability
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (and asking) how a (broader) ="trms">community's ="trms">interests are at stake with this='qstn'>? ='lgc'>{to engage and enrol that ="trms">community through what activities='qstn'>?='lgc'>} ='at'>#micro="trms">world

(my ="trms">routines='lgc'>:) with confidence deliberately working with='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">interrupting ="trms">stories with ="trms">stories
="lsts lst1">•partial connection (and its performance)
="lsts lst1">•moving arguments through by infecting them with other arguments (='lgc'>=/= dialectical)
="lsts lst1">•mobilizing (multidisciplinary) fields (='lgc'>=/= the imperative of knowing A, B, and C first before you do D)
="lsts lst1">•mobilizing ="trms">citation ="trms">apparatus ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that which gives sense to what enables this work ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> deliberately having a conversation with ="nms">="nms">ajayeb al makhlughat
="lsts lst1">•mobilizing anachronic ="trms">apparatus ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mobilizing ="trms">different timescales ='lgc'>==> mixing up what counts as “us” (='lgc'>=/= chronology ='lgc'>[='qstn'>?='lgc'>==> belonging='lgc'>])
="lsts lst1">•re="trms">membering what one[...]