[...] flow of energy, order, waste, transformation,

="frds scrmbld">Vladimir's tether on disambiguity

="frds scrmbld">Elen, adding her own wheels to the flow(s)
and putting a stick/spoke in a rolling wheel (of others='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>[her saboteur trends, چوب لای چرخ (='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? kharab-kari خراب کاری), what is chub lay-e charkh for her='qstn'>? vandalizing the discourse of others='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-the famous vandal of wikipedia with the recursive name “-on wheels” (Willy on Wheels, adding “on wheels” to the title of every single page, using the move function of Wikipedia='lgc'>: renaming the existing title ='lgc'>==> moved to another namespace, without changing the base title)
="prgrph">-like myself, her saboteurs are critically not ="trms">symbolic nor ontic, rather sometimes ="trms">epistemic, or better, ="trms">ontologic='lgc'>: they don't vandalize the “thing” itself, but the “="trms">nature of the properties” that constructs that thing for us
="prgrph">-rocket sculture (what does it mean for her='qstn'>?)


="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[the ="trms">question of inevitability of ="trms">anthropical view='lgc'>]
there is no final answer to a kind of ="trms">question but a lot of answers
through inhabiting a figure you are ="trms">crafting you find yourself addressing a set of problems
="trms">agency='lgc'>: liveliness of artifacts (='qstn'>?). there is some kind of liveliness that is both human and nonhuman
the kind of ="trms">sociality that joins two ="trms">categorically separate mode of ="trms">agencies, is a ="trms">sociality that constitutes both ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">interaction of humans and machines produced both ='lgc'>=/= unilateral action
(my whole point or ="trms">joke, with the bow and arrow was that the arrow of index finger does not move in one way.)
='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= another mode that comes to mind is when your intimacy making leads always to yourself, getting laid, ="trms">literally. that is when your concern becomes only you and someone, sexually ="trms">interested ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> economically, and you don't concern the ="trms">sociality of your people with each other. ='at'>#="trms">techno-capital singular subjectivity ='at'>@='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is super relevant for ="frds scrmbld">Sven, maybe='lgc'>: how one becomes ="trms">interested, invested, and ="trms">skillful in provoking ="trms">interesting ="trms">socialities for friends and peers='lgc'>--and not only for oneself='qstn'>? creating, inciting zones of connectivity='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-='lgc'>[it was not accidental that the ="trms">rhetoric of ="trms">drugs came up with ="frds scrmbld">="frds scrmbld">Lilia when I sug="trms">gested the attention to ="trms">anthropos ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what figures human and otherwise was for her the subject of ="trms">drug-induced ="trms">rhetoric of mind-alteration; (this is the ="trms">anthropos of the Enlightenment Europeans and classical Greece talking='lgc'>:) “in order to get rid of me you must take ="trms">drugs!” ='at'>#="trms">fable/_ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> being sober(='qstn'>?!), ="trms">anthropos becoming, human ="trms">nature, common sense, ="trms">="trms">empiricism and ="trms">interpretation are at stake here='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-='lgc'>[another thing was the label of “="trms">animal” that was passed around as a form of mock, instead of provocations for more conversation, I was stupefied. ='lgc'>--how can we go on together and not render each other commitments nonsense='qstn'>?='lgc'>]


“point of view” is an important ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor


='at'>#in ='mywrk'>my work in ="nms">apass i am working on descriptive practices ='lgc'>[="trms">poetics of ="trms">animal description, ="trms">histories of nonhuman inscription, etc.='lgc'>] to learn to name latent (and therefore emergent) ="trms">ontologies, to name ‘what we are doing in new ways,’ which are hard to name. (also refusing not to name the violences of others and yourself. to reckon the ="trms">nature and scope of the erasures we do in our works.) ='prcnt'>% why do you think that is important='qstn'>?
='at'>#and my shift of attention to peer's works is about that='lgc'>: our domain of practices must make claim on each other ='lgc'><== we inhabit ="trms">differences together (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> attention and work on='lgc'>:) ‘local ="trms">category abstractions’ (how do we talk and make each other feel our subjects of ="trms">interest in ="nms">apass for example) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the cumulative, as="trms">sociated and sensed) ="trms">routines, ="trms">gestures, and (="trms">inter)surfaces of our everyday life in ="nms">apass, as a group of rese="trms"nttrm="search">archers, that don't necessarily align ='lgc'>==> ="trms">worlding comes from these things.
='lgc'>[attunement ='lgc'>=/= argument='lgc'>]


the name of the ="trms">world is “detail”


='strcls'>***="trms">translation (essentailly imperfect) is the very condition of signification ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">trope is the very condition of ="trms">language

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

don't be docile bodies or innocent bystander, do what you have to do to constitute your courage
all i am saying is that='lgc'>: it is not clear what the destiny of art (or of anything) is

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

perhaps what i am trying to learn='lgc'>--with ="nms">apass, ="nms">ajayeb, ="trms">writing, ="nms">harem, etc='lgc'>--is to ask what do i need='lgc'>--which ="trms">skills, abilities, or ="trms">literacies='lgc'>--to become ="trms">="trms">equipped to share the experience of the habits of the ="trms">world (of ="nms">ajayeb) that i am discovering

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="frds scrmbld">Luisa='lgc'>: “the visual (side)effects of a ‘not being supported’”
effect ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> object ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> suport ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> object2 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> suport3 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> suport4 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ...
(at one point ="frds scrmbld">Marialena pulling away a support box ='lgc'>==> ="frds scrmbld">Luisa's cry sound side-effect of a ‘not being supported’)
="lsts lst1">•='qstn'>?how is it done for her='lgc'>: construction of in="trms">different objects
="lsts lst1">•which import function is ="trms">materializing her ‘objects’='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[public import='lgc'>]



="large lg1" stl="font-size:125%"> I want my friends to become marvelous thinkers makers, I want them to ask ="trms">interesting ="trms">questions



="frds scrmbld">Esta='lgc'>: “when we enter the ="trms">presentation we are rese="trms"nttrm="search">archers, we are not friends” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “neutrality” of encounter='lgc'>]
(but i want to explore new places in ='mywrk'>my work with the people who care for you)
(is this at all possible='qstn'>? to enter with friends a non-friend zone='qstn'>?)

in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion ='lgc'>=/= involvement
(in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion usually mistaken as ="trms">literally for physical in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion)



How ="frds scrmbld">Kobe's work can move from a “case-finder ="trms">agency” to a consequential work='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">storytellings for making consequential meanings='strcls'>*='lgc'>] that means='lgc'>: what does it mean to live in the consequences of the ="trms">relations one is enacting='qstn'>?
(when I look at my friends and peers in ="nms">apass, I can see and feel the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges they inhabit in their bodies and the living effects of their ="trms">languages. I re-figurally feel the figures they ="trms">embody and their objects whether they assist or resist states of transformation.)


ephemeral things become food

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> ="frds scrmbld">Esta, risking one's life


='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda, ="frds scrmbld">Xiri,
='thdf'>the idea of “express its inner experience”
simulation of

="frds scrmbld">Xiri's sense of entitlement to accusation

="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%">
='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo, ="trms">fiction of sharing
‘something tangible, like a meal’
something phantasmatically hooked up to libidinal openness, like a ="trms">drug


='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Elen, DUI='lgc'>: driving under influence, what are we on when they were driving her cars
DUI has become the pharmecy take on ="trms">drugs to take away and winning the ="trms">drug war
movement under influence, MUI
legelized use of motor activity
driving while impaired/driving while intoxicated (DWI)
drink-driving (UK)
driving risky (DR)
drunk driver (DD)

='thdf'>the notion of game and rule for ="frds scrmbld">Elen and ="frds scrmbld">Luisa and ="frds scrmbld">Eszter='lgc'>: it is until ages of 3 and 6 that ="trms">children must not play by rules, and only after that the concept of rule-based-games (such as sports) should be introduced to them. what does that say about our artistic environment when we talk rules or breaking rules='qstn'>?
i am becoming more ="trms">interested in the ‘rules’ that the artist (or non-artist) is proposing, and not my own ‘freedom’ in their work. what does it mean or do to become ="trms">interested in the ='strcls'>*freedom of others='strcls'>* and not yourself='qstn'>? ='lgc'>==> paying attention to the most implicit rules of your game, that means i am paying attention to your freedom that has ="trms">articulated itself in the creative ="trms">gesture

="large lg5" stl="font-size:154%">
instead of (the “how” of) “how do i show my ="trms">interested texts='qstn'>?” (which was proposed in ="frds scrmbld">Maarten's exhibition of ="trms">poems) i like to ask (the “what” of) “what requires ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='qstn'>?” (also ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sven) (my kill-joys in ="nms">apass ... am i being too ="trms">ontologic with everything='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> I am operating from the ="trms">position that understanding ="trms">materials, practices, and ="trms">interpretation implies ="trms">questioning ="trms">ontological assumption ='lgc'>==> challenge concepts)


='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eszter='lgc'>: is there a notion of ‘="trms">natural’ embeded in her ‘compelled’='qstn'>? there is nothing ="trms">natural about us being here, there is nothing ="trms">natural about here
="lsts lst1">•cognitivism='lgc'>: (when talking of re="trms">presentation) a psychology of doing which emphasizes human cognition endowment enabling man to develop intellectually ='lgc'>==> classifications (are easy seen) as properties of mind ='lgc'>=/= classifications as ="trms">materials or ="trms">materially textured ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “a common way to hear people's experience of this ="trms">materiality is through ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors. So the generation of ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors is closely linked with the shift to texture.” (="ppl">="ppl">Bowker)
="lsts lst1">•behaviorism='lgc'>: a theory of doing that focuses on objectively observable behaviors and discounts independent activities of the minds i[...]