[...] />
individua="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic and ="trms">social ="ppl">Darwinist overtones

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]inovation='lgc'>: a form of wishful thinking that aims to bring about the desired transformations without the as="trms">sociated costs in time and human effort (Suchman ='and'>& Bishop)
(‘labor-intensive artistic work’='lgc'>: noninovative creative work; deepen the ="trms">density of curiosity;)

capitalism continuously applies new ="trms">technology designed to fragment and de="trms">skill labor, so that labor becomes cheaper and subject to greater control (="ppl">Wajcman)

(sometimes) obsolescence is created through minor redesigns of ="trms">consumer commodities

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%"> “let's sell more” ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> undesirable consequences for human ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights, global trade in rare ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metals, and toxic waste disposal

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">technological determinism and optimism='lgc'>: the belief that the ="trms">present ="trms">social arrangements and ="trms">technologies were the inevitable byproducts of ="trms">historical developement, and that any problems entailed in our ="trms">technologies and their production processes can be eliminated with further ="trms">technological innovations

competetiveness and the ="trms">technological ='strcls'>*savvy='strcls'>* implicit in innovation are themselves markers of contemporary masculinity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “the enduring force of the identification between ="trms">technology and manliness is not an inherent biological sex ="trms">difference. it is instead the result of the ="trms">historical and cultural construction of gender” (="ppl">Wajcman)

a big part of the problem is that women's ="trms">technological labor (='lgc'>=/= ghost busters) is culturally invisible ='lgc'>--(="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King in her research on ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies argues)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (a metonymy='lgc'>:) when ="trms">technologies are reduced to singular, stable, self-contained devices ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ ="ppl">="ppl">Star Wars='lgc'>] ='lgc'>=/= assemblages
='lgc'>[dichotomy of “enforcement ='lgc'>=/= destruction” ="ppl">="ppl">Star Wars either or='lgc'>: if you are not destroying it you are enforcing it='lgc'>]

problems that cannot be conceptualized in terms of ="trms">measures and endpoints, or which involve ho="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic, qualitative solutions, will be at a disadvantage for selection

(Cowan shows) the developement of new household tachnologies did not free women from the domestic shpere. rather, it allowed women to enter the paid labor force while leaving the gendered division of labor in the home untouched.


(makes me throw up ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) large ="trms">literature of self-determination theory (='lgc'>~ showing people are more creative and happy when their work allows them to be autonomous, related, and competent) ='lgc'>+ reward ="trms">systems cultivating competitive environments
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]autonomy='lgc'>: self-willing, volitional, being an ="trms">agent in the action ='lgc'>=/= being a “pawn”

spheres where processes and outcomes have been the name of the game (in feminized fields of education and librarianship)

labs (such as laser developement) that require collaboration with other labs

trading zones='lgc'>: a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor for understanding how cooperation between rese="trms"nttrm="search">archers enables new ="trms">scientific paradigms ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">="ppl">Galison

='strcls'>*the development of this or that research looks like a continuous ="trms">trajectory, but the ="trms">trajectory was actually discontinuous and ruptured. that fact that we have invented or discovered something makes that developement seem inevitable, but things could always have turned out some other way='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Cowan > ="ppl">="ppl">Calvert

competition is not a guarantor of innovation, our cultural belief in it can obscure other explanations for innovation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>for example (Wylie showing='lgc'>:) (archaeology's enshrined belief that) male-centered hunting activities dominated pre="trms">historic caloric intakes ='lgc'>==='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>==> other hypotheses for the ="trms">transition to agriculture ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> women's leading role in the development of agriculture='lgc'>--arguably the most significant innovation in human ="trms">history='lgc'>--could finally be detected


='lgc'>[bids for status by denying the feminized and second class aspects of library work='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***the labor of care is at the core of library work='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*teaching, like ="trms">technology, is always a ="trms">relationship, and that ="trms">relationship is undergrided by the labor of care='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">affective labor is ="trms">literally vital to the successful delivery of other kinds of services)='strcls'>***
the ways women are called on to manage their and other's feelings ='lgc'><='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">technology is ="trms">positioned in out culture as rational and precise and therefore (masculine and) unemotional ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> look at the film Lucy='lgc'>]

successful education and mentorship depend on this ="trms">skill, which, like household labor, is difficult to account for in “competitive” economic analysis


='strcls'>**="trms">articulation work='strcls'>**
the labor necessary to make ="trms">technologies fit together seamlessly ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Leigh ="ppl">="ppl">Star
(='mywrk'>my work begins in) information ="trms">systems may leave gaps in work processes that require real-time adjustments, or ‘="trms">articulation work,’ to complete the processes
(='mywrk'>my research='lgc'>: through ="nms">ajayeb i have been busy with learning to “make friends” with both ="trms">technologies and theories)

every ="trms">system is an assemblage ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">="ppl">Calvert applying ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway's insight and think of ="trms">technologies as significant prostheses ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]librarianship='lgc'>: a work that (primarily) hooks up people with their ="trms">technologies

librarians ="trms">articulate ="trms">technologies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they help people adapt ="trms">technologies

librarian's ="trms">articulation work is both ="trms">technological and ="trms">affective ='lgc'>=/= competitive


(in ="trms">techno-capital) supressing labor costs ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> de="trms">skilling

de="trms">skilling and de-professionalization under the ="trms">intertwined guises of competitiveness and innovation

an ='thdf'>example of de="trms">skilling='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>: “to be feminized means to be made extremely vulnerable; able to be disassembled, reassembled, exploited as a reserve labor force, seen less as workers than as servers; subjected to time arrangements on and off the paid job that make a mockery of a limited work day; leading to an existence that always borders on being obs="trms">cene, out of place, and reducible to sex. de="trms">skilling is an old strategy newly applicable to formerly privileged workers.”

education has been difficult to comodify, and remains labor intensive ='lgc'>=/= innovations in online education ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> creating inroads in the de="trms">skilling and commodification of teaching labor='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•course curriculum ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> course content
="lsts lst1">•teaching ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> delivery
='strcls'>*video ="trms">technologies ='lgc'>+ ="trms">internet ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> face-to-face ="trms">interpersonal relating to be captured and reused ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> new depths of commodification
='strcls'>*="trms">internet ="trms">technologies can be used to provide ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous, a="trms">synchronous learning and mentorship, or they can be used to decrease labor costs, but they cannot do much of both ="trms">simultaneously(='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">question ='at'>@="nms">apass)


="ppl">="ppl">Calvert='lgc'>: ='lgc'>[...however,='lgc'>] for competition='lgc'>--='lgc'>[or any good/bad object we are working on='lgc'>] to be a useful strategy, it has to happen in a larger context of cooperation and collaboration
(='thdf'>for example ='thdf'>the notion of “future” has to happen in a larger context in which ="trms">different futurities for diverse ="trms">communities is thinkable)


="trms">method ='lgc'><='lgc'>==='lgc'>{
='lgc'>+ sensitivity to the ="trms">historical moment (multiculturalism, extreme changes in the meaning of ‘global,’ etc.)
='lgc'>+ an assemblage of tools that are ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready to hand (theoretically driven, are pleasant and effective to use, etc.)
='lgc'>+ ="trms">embody an ethical commitment to ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
="lsts lst2">◦emic='lgc'>: the values and meanings of those who are being studied
="lsts lst2">◦etic='lgc'>: within a way to explore the conventions, standards and infrastructures that both constrain and enable their experiences

="large lg10" stl="font-size:114%">
="ppl">Leigh ="ppl">="ppl">Star
="lsts lst1">•qualitative ="trms">methods
="lsts lst1">•lateral thinking
="lsts lst1">•="trms">poetics of infrastructure
="lsts lst1">•='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]boundary objects='lgc'>: examines assemblages of humans and things, and how things that exist in more than one ="trms">community of practice are used in performing cooperative work


the role of practical knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge in organizational life

sensitivity of an ethno="trms">methodological orientation

(="nms">apass's) intellectual capital (is not centered in their official document re="trms">positories and ="trms">databases, rather is in the largely undocumented ideas, insights, and know-how of its ="trms">members='lgc'>: ="frds scrmbld">="frds scrmbld">Lilia, ="frds scrmbld">Pierre, ="frds scrmbld">Nicolas, ="trms">Joke, ="frds scrmbld">Steven, Michele,)

exigencies of work

='strcls'>****much of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge often remains ="trms">embodied in the practice
commonly shared through conversations and ="trms">stories among small circles of colleagues and work groups ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> local vernacular ='lgc'>--convert='lgc'>='lgc'>--> other forms ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> other ="trms">members of the organization can understand ='and'>& ='strcls'>*act upon='strcls'>* together

="frds">Sina ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> richer comprehension of ="trms">socially organised work practice into the process of engineering ="trms">technological ="trms">systems

="ppl">="ppl">Calvert ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> her work is about the enduring qualities of the ="trms">book and how its resistance to commodification enables this thing we call a public library.
she is ="trms">interested in developing library-appropriate research ="trms">methods for thinking critically about old and new ="trms">technologies
="prgrph">-we ="trms">naturalize the way ="trms">technological infrastructures make ethical decisions for us ='lgc'>=/= producing ="trms">methods/ethic that allows librarians to mandate characteristics in developing ="trms">technologies which both preserve librarians’ prerogatives to make (necessary visible) ethical judgment calls ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="ppl">="ppl">Calvert
جعبه='lgc'>--"containers” continue to ="trms">dictate the name of the game (for the immensely diverse patronage of the public library)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

bi="trms">lingualism
="trms">different ="trms">languages (="trms">farsi and arabic in ="nms">ajayeb) refers to ="trms">different value ="trms">systems and to ="trms">different lived experience

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Ahmed='lgc'>]

(="trms">complaint ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=) diversity-work='lgc'> = ="trms">data-collection

we learn about the damage we cause, of how causes are understood as damage

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

my old background (in computer ="trms">sciences)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•www.joelonsoftware.com (Joel Spolsky runs a company which sells bug ="trms">databases, “FogBugz”)
="lsts lst1">•wiki.c2.com
="lsts lst1">•“Structure and ="trms">Interpretation of Computer Programs”


computational process

abstract beings (processes='strcls'>*) manipulate other abstract things (="trms">data='strcls'>*)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a pattern of rules (program='strcls'>*)

programming='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">linguistic abstraction='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> engineering design='lgc'>] ='lgc'>: building a mini-="trms">language to express a problem, using a fixed computer programming ="trms">language (on a given hardware) to construct a new ="trms">language that enables describing (and hence to think) the problem ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> using='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•primitives means of combination
="lsts lst1">•primitives means of abstraction
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">presentation of ="trms">data and control (='lgc'><='lgc'>~='lgc'>~ individual bits of storage and primitive machine ="trms">instructions)
='lgc'>+ using the given hardware to erect ="trms">systems/utilities for the efficient implementation of resource-limited computations


distinction between “passive” ="trms">data and “active” processes ='lgc'>=/= Lisp
(procedures and ="trms">data are just abstractions, they are not really distinct) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> programming ="trms">language should have ="trms">methods for combining and abstracting procedures and ="trms">data

means of abstraction='lgc'>: by which compound elements can be named and manipulated as units


modularity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> localized part of the ="trms">system
='lgc'><='lgc'>== perception of the ="trms">system
="lsts lst1">•objective='lgc'>: viewing a large ="trms">system as a collection of distinct objects ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> concerned with how a computational object can change and yet maintain its identity
="lsts lst1">•streamous='lgc'>: information that flow in the ="trms">system ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> delayed evaluation

(='thdf'>for example) a bank account='lgc'>: has state in that the answer to the ="trms">question “Can I withdraw $100='qstn'>?” depends upon the ="trms">history of de="trms">posit and withdrawal transactions

object de="trms">composed into computational objects (each with their own time-varying local state variables) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> model

object programming='lgc'>: model real-="trms">world objects with local state by computational objects with local variables ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> identify time variation in the real ="trms">world with time variation in the computer ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> implement the time variation of the states of the model objects in the computer with assignments to the local variables of the model objects
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (how='qstn'>?) model a time function

stream='lgc'>: delayed (in="trms">finite) ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list

stream programming='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">different abstractions such as='lgc'>: map, filter, accumulate,
="lsts lst1">•transformations of ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">lists
="lsts lst1">•sequence manipulations without incurring the costs of manipulating sequences as ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">lists
="lsts lst1">•tadriji incremental computation


random='lgc'>: statistical properties of uniform distribution


object-orientation='lgc'>: poly="trms">morphic abstract ="trms">data types ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">relational ="trms">data model



Building Abstractions with ="trms">Data

how to use='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•primitive ="trms">data (numbers)
="lsts lst1">•primitive operations (arithmetic operations)

building abstractions by combining ="trms">data objects to form compound ="trms">data ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*to increase the modularity='strcls'>* of (our) designs ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> to increase/enhance the expressive power of our ="trms">language

="trms">data abstraction='lgc'>:
='strcls'>*="trms">technique of isolating='strcls'>* (the parts of a program that deal with) how ="trms">data objects are ‘re="trms">presented’ from (the parts of a program that deal with) how ="trms">data objects are ‘used’


="large lg6" stl="font-size:116%"> versioning
garbage collection

="large lg10" stl="font-size:107%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

the ="trms">question of “what ='lgc'>[='not'>✕='lgc'>] can learn from ='lgc'>[Y='lgc'>]='qstn'>?”


="ppl">="ppl">Calvert on Mestiza consciousness
library and information ="trms">scientists
consciousness of the borderlands ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ in between ="trms">categories, creative/annihilating forces a person living borderlands must struggle against='lgc'>]

='strcls'>***contradictory impulse for ='strcls'>*hording='strcls'>* ='and'>& ='strcls'>*sharing='strcls'>*

="large lg34" stl="font-size:129%"> ="trms">categorizing, naming, describing ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> power-laden practices we cannot do without

each ='strcls'>*schema='strcls'>* reveals its ="trms">priorities, legitimizes/delegitimizes, renders visible/invisible the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge it contains/ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes

(="ppl">="ppl">Foucault='lgc'>:) library='lgc'>: (places that preserve) discourses that one wishes to re="trms">member and keep in circulation ='lgc'>[='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Anand's jinn temporality and genealogy of human ="trms">memory='lgc'>]

mestiza ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> hybrid way of knowing/acting/living, as “none of the above”
what is hybrid and impure may be ="trms">monstrous (in the ="trms">epistemologies of power) and may experience ='strcls'>*hightened visibility='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= scrutiny, study, problematization, pity)

“orphans of infrastructure” (="ppl">Leigh ="ppl">="ppl">Star)

locked in a duel with the oppressor
lived experiences of marked classes
(in each duality pair, one is called “the con="trms">situtive outside” ='lgc'>[subject/object, male/female, etc.='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> switching polarity ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> valorizing feminine over masculine, black over white, nurture over ="trms">nature, emotion over reason

crossing of cultures

="large lg1" stl="font-size:141%"> ='strcls'>*which collectivity does the daughter of the darkskinned mother ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen to='qstn'>?='strcls'>*

(while i was in ="nms">apass i had a shift of attention to) the ='strcls'>*labor of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge work='strcls'>* (in collective digital flesh life)

media ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= knwol="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge form

in media arts studies i learn to ask which cruicual ="trms">material limitations have been radically eased in a digital era ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> impulse to hoard/share ='lgc'>+ constant tension with the ="trms">epistemological work of ="trms">categorization and classification (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">database) ='lgc'>+ (ongoing) feminization of the field

the library and information ="trms">science knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> intense expertise required to enact it ='lgc'>=/=!='qstn'>? art expertise (a ="trms">category of works that are expertise-free)

(gift of ="ppl">Marx, ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault, Lorde, ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway, ="ppl">Leigh ="ppl">="ppl">Star in) ='strcls'>*understanding subjugated ="trms">epistemologies='strcls'>*

(Lorde) master's tool dismantle the master's house='qstn'>?='lgc'> = can the ="trms">technologies and ="trms">epistemologies that have been used to organize thinking about the ="trms">world in one way succesfully uproot that way='qstn'>?

“recovering multivocality”

رسوب
='strcls'>*enact residuality
='strcls'>*residual (of transformations ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sometimes wiping away previous ="trms">techniques for dividing and describing, and substituting another set of ="trms">categories that don't easily map to the first ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> eliminating the residuum of the old order ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> case of ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> can we make overlaps and hybridities of old/new ="trms">categories='qstn'>? ='lgc'>~ ='strcls'>*residual ="trms">categories='strcls'>*='lgc'>: ="trms">affective-="trms">epistemic content that often go unclassified. ="ppl">="ppl">Calvert='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*="trms">affect='strcls'>* is too thin, too subjective to calcify into a ="trms">category. it abundantly uses its ="trms">categories in a way that offers a kaleidoscopic shuffling and reshuffling of the items='strcls'>***)='lgc'>])
='strcls'>*residuum

="trms">categories overlapping, non-hierarchical (“="trms">animal” ='lgc'>+ “livestock”, etc.)

truthiness
melting pot
actions (filled with ="trms">verbs)
nouns (both living and nonliving entities)

='strcls'>*score of recognizable ="trms">historical era='strcls'>*

using='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•filmic ="trms">techniques (animation, montage, time lapse)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">affective ="trms">techniques (sarcasm, intimacy)


how can we address aspects of ="nms">apass's exceptionalism='qstn'>?
(with its things='lgc'>: characters, colors, doings, values)
='strcls'>*="trms">historical/cultural ="trms">specificities of ="nms">apass='strcls'>*


enlightenment in="trms">heritances='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•quest for universality
="lsts lst1">•


apparent seamlessness and universality with the veneer روکش of helpfulness ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> purity, deny multivocality, hide the residuum produced, and ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clude hybridity
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (pulling the carpet of familiarity out from under users='lgc'>:)
to replace ‘familiar generic conventions’ (='lgc'>~ universal) ='lgc'>--replace-with='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a “universal of local application” (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= residuum)

(we rely on) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]words='lgc'>: value-laden components of ="trms">language that also serve as ="trms">categories and moor لنگر us in the ="trms">symbolic, to effect the transformations of the collections

labels ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-/='lgc'>='lgc'>==> power and oppression ="trms">epistemologies ='lgc'><='lgc'>== ='strcls'>*organizing logics='strcls'>* (that remain invisible when when we change the words or sub="trms">situte new sets of ="trms">categories)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>that is why i am reluctant with only changing the ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">data ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Pierre='lgc'>: using ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">data to manipulate the organizing ="trms">apparatus ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> versions of residuality (='qstn'>?)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[working on ="nms">apass milieu ="trms">data model, summer2018='lgc'>]

c.r.i. (“collective research ="trms">interface”)
='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a pathological collage

discrete object (of problem ='lgc'>[who, when, how,='lgc'>]) ="trms">interface
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> refering to something outside c.r.i. (outside the digital model)

face (slider) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> object ="trms">monster

(='qstn'>?what is lost at) linking the ="trms">symbolic space of ="trms">data-model to the qualities of the rese="trms"nttrm="search">arches of participants ='lgc'>[which are ="trms">relational, procedural, and emotional='lgc'>]

="large lg22" stl="font-size:131%"> s.s.s. (scroller, slider, still-life)

discourse ='lgc'>=/= valorizing information

="large lg22" stl="font-size:115%"> ="frds scrmbld">Pierre's ="trms">fables='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•“nonviolent way”
="lsts lst1">•“not by chance ...”

='strcls'>*Apologue='strcls'>*

research ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">data flow
sieve ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> nodes in/of residual


="trms">internal ="trms">categories='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•stickiness
="lsts lst1">•="trms">zoom
="lsts lst1">•cheat
="lsts lst1">•persistence
="lsts lst1">•repetition
="lsts lst1">•(vulgar)
="lsts lst1">•
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> topology='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. ramp
="lstsrd">2. nest
="lstsrd">3. skew

ramp='lgc'>: sequential, one dimensional, ‘sliders’
nest='lgc'>: fractal quality, JSON, hierarchical tree, ‘comments’
skew='lgc'>: ="trms">verb act, streching, ‘2D field picker’

(slider='lgc'>: marking everything)

semantic in flux ='lgc'>+ persistence
object re="trms">pository ='lgc'>+ identifiers


feedback ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quasi object ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> structured knower ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">data


='at'>#workshop in ="nms">apass 2018 Summer
...a series of ="trms">data models that was produced during a three days work session in a.pass May 2018.
The aim was to create a “filter" for the artistic research projects of each participants, in order to train in making ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta-="trms">linguistic abstractions (on a given computer hardware) to construct a “thing” that enables describing the problem of Building Abstractions with ="trms">Data, to increase/enhance the expressive/descriptive power of the ="trms">languages we use. It addresses the ="trms">question of machine/human ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readability in the digital imperative of computational ="trms">world we are inhabiting, with the particular case of a.pass artistic research environments for advanced performance studies.
="lsts lst1">•="trms">interested in computational ="trms">literacy (in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding ="trms">data-collection, librarianship) as part of our ='strcls'>*diversity-work='strcls'>* and our ='strcls'>*="trms">articulation-work='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•="trms">interested in ="trms">different ="trms">languages (english, computer, non-sign ="trms">languages, etc.) refers to ="trms">different value ="trms">systems and to ="trms">different lived experience
="lsts lst1">•="trms">interested in the ='strcls'>*labor of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge-work='strcls'>* (in collective digital flesh life)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">interested in shifts in topology (the ongoing reworking of bodily boundaries of each of our research practices)
="lsts lst1">•


TERMINOLOGY='lgc'>:

='strcls'>*="trms">articulation-work='lgc'>: the labor necessary to make ="trms">technologies fit together seamlessly

='strcls'>*diversity-work='lgc'>: a kind of work in which we learn about the damage we cause, and of how “causes” are understood as “damage”

='strcls'>*librarianship='lgc'>: a work that hooks up people with their ="trms">technologies

='strcls'>*="trms">data abstraction='lgc'>: a ='strcls'>*="trms">technique of isolating='strcls'>* (the parts of your mini-="trms">language that deal with) how ="trms">data/info objects are ‘re="trms">presented’ from (the parts of your mini-="trms">language that deal with) how ="trms">data/info objects are ‘used’ (='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> i addressed this in my ="trms">fable workshop in a totally ="trms">different ="trms">epistemology)

='strcls'>*model='lgc'>: your object de="trms">composed into ='strcls'>*computational compound objects='strcls'>* (each with their own time-varying local state variables)

(re="trms">presentation of ="trms">data and control over ="trms">data='lgc'>:)
='strcls'>*modular='lgc'>: localized part of the ="trms">system that are produced by the perception of the ="trms">system
='strcls'>*objective='lgc'>: viewing a large ="trms">system as a collection of distinct objects. concerned with how a computational object can change and yet maintain its identity
='strcls'>*streamous='lgc'>: information that flow in the ="trms">system. its evaluation is delayed. in="trms">finite ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list

='strcls'>*="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">data='lgc'>: machine-="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readable persistence statements

='strcls'>*digital ="trms">interface='lgc'>: discrete object of your “research problem” that refers to something outside the cri (outside the digital model)

='strcls'>*topology='lgc'>: a (proposed) body-plan to investigate ="trms">questions of ='strcls'>*connectivity='strcls'>* and ='strcls'>*boundaries='strcls'>*, in order to find out what remains invariant as a result of transformation. this will direct us to propose (well-intended but not tested) ='strcls'>*transversal objects='strcls'>*.
to be able to propose='lgc'>: in the culture of each pad='lgc'>+participant='lgc'>+research what connects and joins, what delinks and disconnects.


PRACTICAL='lgc'>:

we want to find out how cri's “filter” ="trms">translates its politics into ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">data
and
what happens in linking the ="trms">symbolic space of ="trms">data-model to the (="trms">relational, procedural, emotional) qualities of the rese="trms"nttrm="search">arches of participants

we will work on the block's opening week feedbacks and process them in this diagram='lgc'>:
feedback ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quasi object ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> structured knower ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">data
(or ="trms">technically='lgc'>:)
semantic in flux ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> persistence statements ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> object re="trms">pository ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> identifiers

(Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday are spent on the creation of “quasi objects”)

i propose some (well-intended but not tested) ="trms">internal ="trms">categories='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•stickiness
="lsts lst1">•="trms">zoom
="lsts lst1">•cheat
="lsts lst1">•persistence
="lsts lst1">•repetition
="lsts lst1">•vulgar

(i will describe them later)

and these ="trms">categories produce three topologies='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. ramp
="lstsrd">2. nest
="lstsrd">3. skew

(this is a maneuver to replace the ="trms">question of ‘strategy’ to ‘topology’, the first act of making quasi-objects)

ramp='lgc'>: sequential, one dimensional, ‘sliders’
nest='lgc'>: fractal, serializable, arborescent, ‘comments’
skew='lgc'>: ="trms">verb-active, streching, ‘2D field color picker po="trms">inter’

each is “queryable” in ="trms">different ways and propose ="trms">different difficulties
each of them addapted from an existing ="trms">technologies (range sliders, commenting, color pickers)
each embeds one of='lgc'>: colors, doings, values

slider='lgc'>: marking everything with decimals
comments='lgc'>: hypertextualizing
field picker='lgc'>: sp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they are all milieu-makers

ramp ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> arc of necessity
nest ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mosaic divisions
skew ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> chromatic/luminous effect (of mixture)


and also='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•to address (in a longer term) how ="nms">apass performs analysis and ="trms">prioritization of its own service de="trms">finition='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•to address (in a longer term) ="trms">historical/cultural ="trms">specificities of ="nms">apass
="lsts lst1">•to address aspects of ="nms">apass's exceptionalism (its characters, colors, doings, values)



REPORT='lgc'>:

="large lg34" stl="font-size:112%"> ="frds scrmbld">Geert
="trms">zoom / biger picture
perform a ="trms">zoom
="frds scrmbld">Geert and Michael knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ="trms">zoom-level
="frds scrmbld">Geert's strech-work
which cheats
vulgar='lgc'>: direct, ='lgc'>=/= suffisticated, ='lgc'>=/= nice(in a classical sense), ='lgc'>=/= institutional ="trms">code ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a cheat='lgc'>], everyday, good taste, context='qstn'>?!!
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: skew ='lgc'>--changed='lgc'>='lgc'>--> nest (tow branches answering yes and no to='lgc'>: “is he cheating='qstn'>?”)

="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo
stickiness ='lgc'>~ residual (left overs of impression), we couldn't find little objects, litte stickies
="trms">zoom is tooooo wide, mega="trms">categories, “fermentation” is a ="trms">different ="trms">zoom level
cheat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> perception/intention, value of non-doing ='qstn'>?, ‘order is cheat’, ritual ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> heal/cope
vulgar='lgc'>: ritual of popular knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">social acceptence, ="trms">communicating emotional needs, guilt on behalf of the vulgars,
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: skew (with 4 axioms='lgc'>: negativity, ="trms">positivity, passivity, ritual)

="frds scrmbld">Caterina
sticky='lgc'>: difiicult to remove ="trms">categories, dirty, quality of ="trms">trape, almost negative, like honey as an ="trms">intermediary sticky for other objects to become sticky
="trms">zoom='lgc'>: Latina candition macro, ass rincles micro, herself, change of lens is what ="trms">matters not the ="trms">zoom level, the macro of the term culture itself
cheat='lgc'>: against the rule of ="trms">community/aggreement, always cheating the ="trms">system, against the game, bad ="trms">relation to the game, lazy ="trms">relation, faking='qstn'>?
vulgar='lgc'>: ordinary, insultive, perjurative, of the “people”, (="frds scrmbld">Geert='lgc'>:) a marking always coming from above, what television does='lgc'>: non-actual ='lgc'>+ ="trms">spectacle, (="frds scrmbld">Elen='lgc'>:) immoral, not o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal, not elegant, thinking in terms of the ‘same’, group forming, non-individual, twards mass formation,
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: nest

="frds scrmbld">Eszter
polarized lense
confusion / being confused is ‘cheating’
stickiness absent
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: nest (with two branches='lgc'>: naive ='and'>& political leader)

="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Godard">Goda
nothing sticks anymore therefor we go to swamp to stick to relevant objects
swamp as archive (refuge from the capita="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list) ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? cheat
constructing ‘bad example’ (='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> role model
="trms">zooming in losers of capitalism
X-ray kind of lens into the opacity of swamp
(her) treasures in the swamp ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">epistemological buried objects='lgc'>]
criticizing how capitalism ="trms">zooms for her irrelevant objects
buffoon ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> vulgar
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: skew (the skew is a plain around the ="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges, gets deeper in the middle, and a narrow way up in the center='lgc'>: the exit)

="frds scrmbld">Elen
="trms">presence of the working of subconscious ='lgc'>==provokes='lgc'>='lgc'>==> etymology
very sticki “hell yea!"s
affirmative, sometimes ="trms">technical knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
something sold (“self”) with something ="trms">morphic on it (“apparition” or ‘surat’ in ="trms">farsi)
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: ramp

="frds scrmbld">Hoda
cheat='lgc'>: sharp radical formation, playing ambiguity
totalizing vision lense (“if then all...”)
“because i asked i could feel”
anti-psychological
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: ramp

="frds scrmbld">Katinka
makeover slider
vulgar='lgc'>: makeover show, e-bay
statements not touching her, something else is sticki object='lgc'>: ="trms">sympathy='qstn'>?
slider='lgc'>: stack
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: ramp (makeover)

="frds scrmbld">Nassia
stick='lgc'>: something bodily, heat, sweat, property of objects
="trms">zoom is the op="trms">posit of body
gaze inside ='lgc'>+ anatomy
cheating='lgc'>: on people negative / on ="trms">systems ="trms">positive
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: ramp

="frds scrmbld">Laura
osmotic='lgc'> = french kiss
administered (by machine) body
the good example
beauty is invested in...
the (unchanging) core of the cuttle-fish
popular='lgc'> = vulgar
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: skew (regimented floor plan)

="frds scrmbld">Maurice
cheat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">joker, fool
cute='lgc'>: getting off the leash of institution
bear b="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurs what...
“but I am just...”
bribe economy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> honest and human
sug="trms">gested topology='lgc'>: nest

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[title='lgc'>]
archives of open desire

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='at'>#drawing exercises in built environment (with Sizek ='lgc'>+ Mathews https://culanth.org/fieldsights/1542-="trms">methods-for-many-="trms">anthropo="trms">cenes-with-andrew-s-mathews)
="lstsrd">1. pick a charismatic building/statue/object on your built environment, and draw a form of it, inviting to identify details of the object that reveal aspects of its ="trms">history or use today
="lstsrd">2. compare drawings and use the drawings to tell ="trms">stories about the object and its use or importance to life in that environment
="lstsrd">3. invite to reflect on the ways that drawing infrastructure can reveal processes at multiple temporal and spatial scales

discussion ="trms">questions/="trms">writing ="trms">response ="trms">questions='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•Which features of the structure stood out, and what do these sug="trms">gest about the processes of its creation and use='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•How has its infrastructure changed over time, and how are these changes evidenced in the built form itself='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•How does your structure relate to others in its immediate vicinity, and in what ways do ="trms">relationships between structures help reveal ="trms">social ="trms">relations='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•What traces of ="trms">past events are embedded in infrastructure or its ="trms">memories, and how can we render these traces ="trms">present='qstn'>?

drawings has to do with the incompleteness of knowing and re="trms">presenting
indeterminacy at ‘the same time’

(='qstn'>?in which locations you can get a good) human ="trms">response to='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•slow processes (soil, geology, plant form)
="lsts lst1">•fast processes (plant seasonal behavior, weather, human ="trms">responses to all of these things)

='strcls'>*drawing as structured ="trms">wondering/wandering='strcls'>*

use of the ='strcls'>*dramatic='strcls'>* as ="trms">method ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to entertain multiple ="trms">worldviews
to maintain irreducible complexity and to recenter ="trms">historical processes as central to understanding contemporary politics
(="trms">history and drama)
="prgrph">-facts as enacted and performed before audiences (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> tradition in ="trms">science and ="trms">technology)

='strcls'>**knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge is always performed, ="trms">staged, and enacted='strcls'>** ='lgc'><='lgc'>== ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb

how to tell the dramatic ="trms">stories

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

notes from ="frds scrmbld">Sofia's seminar on documentation

the ="trms">questions i brought home with ="frds scrmbld">Kobe='lgc'>:

the ="trms">ontological ="trms">relationships between law and art, who protects who='qstn'>? what protects protection='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> which ="trms">material discursive practices make the ="trms">ontological boundaries of “protection”='qstn'>? (specially today investigating this term is more urgent in a ="trms">world saturated with toxic ="trms">vocabularies of security.) the figure of protection transforms the subjects of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge and knowability ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> look at how the judge was talking about art

(="trms">question of) the production of subjectivity (of the judge himself as an active knowing ="trms">agent and the dead-master as the phantasmatic place-holder of meaning)
this is related to='lgc'>: (="trms">question of) ="trms">responsibility and individuality ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> influences and efforts of the work. two ="trms">interesting moments of genesis occurred='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1- in the court “his work” (Beuys) was mysteriously created
="lstsrd">2- also when Olga got a phone call from the ministry of culture, “her work” was mysteriously created
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> both the court and the phone call are mystic producers of the subjectivity of the artist dead or alive ='lgc'>[='at'>#this needs more investigation='lgc'>]

(="trms">question of) the production of significance and ="trms">difference
look at the speech-acts of the judge in the case of Beuys. which nuances of ="trms">difference are generated, estated, established, and propagated='qstn'>? we can study every syllable of the judge's speech-act. the judge goes from one ="trms">fable to another='lgc'>: ="trms">fables of significance, ="trms">fables of influence, ="trms">fables of impression, etc.

boundary-making practices in our shared struggling ="trms">world
='thdf'>the idea that art “starts” and “stops” somewhere
zeroing the artworks eco="trms">system

when is the moment (or how the moment can be marked) that the judge becomes able to say “OK, I don't know.” or “I am opinionated about this art. Let's bring an expert.”
and beyond that, I am ="trms">wondering, like that judge, when myself standing in front of an artwork (or any work) how i am able to say “I have an opinion, or, I don't know”, “i need expertise in order to look at this”='qstn'>?

="trms">questions of='lgc'>: essence (in art), subjectivity production, protection,



with Vincent

(='qstn'>?what was the) notion of “everything is kept here” in his work

(='qstn'>?why and how) his ="trms">storytelling was all about design ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> his ="trms">stories of ="trms">responsibility and factuality
how and why in our artistic practices, production of ="trms">responsibility and factuality is hold in the terms and services of design and designer that is busy with building enhanced and efficient ="trms">communication ="trms">networks ="trms">historically rooted in the ="trms">geometries of ="trms">modernist project='qstn'>?

(='qstn'>?what is the artist's) busy-ness with design ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> related to the fathers of correction (='qstn'>?) and proper address

who (and why) wants to look at which ="trms">past with lenses and ="trms">geometries of the violent grids of the forefathers of ="trms">modernist design='qstn'>?
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">ontology of document='lgc'>: an artifact with a ="trms">specific layout and design

design has to do with the proper address (='qstn'>?) which is (always) about the proper witness (='qstn'>?)
(in the case of Vincent) do you agree with the amerindian know-how that “a good designer is a dead designer”='qstn'>?

(='qstn'>?what was the) proper ="trms">affect of ="trms">history (that his work was creating)
through the ="trms">aesthetic of old and antique video projectors his colonialism belonged properly to the ="trms">past ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="trms">question of) the production of the proper witness

the architecture and flag of BOZAR plus his notion of design, are they ="trms">interesting and necessary ways of forming kinship and properly distanced ="trms">history='qstn'>?

Vincent “knew” his distance to the ="trms">past (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> do you smell a problem='qstn'>?)
in which clock he is looking at time='qstn'>? which time machine he is handed to or placed in='qstn'>? who/what is making his time model='qstn'>?
also, which segment of your practice is temporalized='qstn'>? this means also which part of your practice stands out of time='qstn'>?



with Olga

regards of the ="trms">question “what are an artwork's boundaries='qstn'>?” and it's ="trms">intersections with documents, ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">lists, and reports

for Olga='lgc'>:
document='lgc'> = evidence
research='lgc'> = mourning
(mourning as the passionate and de="trms">monstrative activity of expressing the state of loss or deprivation of a certain object for a certain subject, and ="trms">demand for its revival or ="trms">memorialization)

what is the feeling of the document='qstn'>?

='strcls'>*document is a ="trms">story that (usually) silences other ="trms">stories='strcls'>*
where our powers to provoke care (could/should) come from (if not from document/evidence)='qstn'>?
is document (in its form and feeling) the best way we have at our disposal to provoke the care of the generations='qstn'>? ...to mark each other with the mark of the care='qstn'>?

putting the ="trms">narrative into proper sleep
casting the names

="prgrph">-artist has turned herself into a mnemonic device ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sug="trms">gesting “amnesia” as her context
="prgrph">-artist has become a reminder and (therefore) her audiences have become ="trms">memorizers

(="trms">question of) ="trms">memory and re="trms">membering ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>the idea of ‘="trms">literal re="trms">membrance’ in her performance, re-="trms">membering, ="trms">literally bringing back the “="trms">members” of the Kurt Jooss company into the ="trms">present of her audiences
="prgrph">-the problem with her re="trms">membrance is that “there is something that is important to re="trms">member” regardless of the person/subject who re="trms">members

indisputability of the Green Table for Olga
the artist has chosen to protect The Green Table's meaning and message (due to her political and ethical commitments ='lgc'>[for ="trms">world peace='qstn'>?='lgc'>]) in a sense her subject of research remains unrese="trms"nttrm="search">arched, her values unevaluated, her moral settlements settled

how can she become ="trms">interested in de="trms">composing her research-bodies of The Green Table='qstn'>?
can we remain critically ethically ="trms">responsible in thinking about the “meaning and message” of our subject of study and still be able to de="trms">compose it in ="trms">interesting ="trms">serious ways='qstn'>? (yes yes)

="trms">questions of='lgc'>: thinking, reminding, remaining,



="frds scrmbld">Sofia's documentation
she asks “what is document today='qstn'>?”
="prgrph">-what was document yesterday (that is not anymore today)='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-how the ="trms">agency and meaning of docu is (or is not) mutating in time='qstn'>?='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-what is beyond the ="trms">question of documentation and preservation='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*durational ="trms">aesthetics='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-is document a limited way of asking ="trms">questions about what we do and our ="trms">relationship with time and duration='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[you never know what the ="trms">present brings into the future.='lgc'>]

what art cannot say that document can='qstn'>? “truth”='qstn'>?
when truth was invented where was document standing='qstn'>?

is document today a mere effect of ="trms">technologies of inscribing='qstn'>?

why we are not talking about “file”='qstn'>?
(='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to the ="trms">ontology of evidence and files in X-Files TV series)

is ‘file’ the bedrock of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading today='qstn'>?

document assumes, constructs and promises its own labor of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading
='qstn'>? document is that which ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reads as referent, truthful, evident, economic value, , ,


="large lg18" stl="font-size:118%">
="frds scrmbld">Femke, with multiple understanders of the blended, blending ="trms">world

the ="trms">question of the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors of the body

manuality
manual understanders

for her “the point of o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin” is at stake='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the “ground” is at once desired and dis="trms">articulated for the sake of an idea of ="trms">situatedness ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> politics of ="trms">positioning

placement, ="trms">world, Dasein, fall

in ="trms">CG bodies are ="trms">articulated in ="trms">differential vectors, not “grounds” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> does she want to ground the body='qstn'>?

she was mobilizing the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors of='lgc'>: body, ground, falling
how is she falling='qstn'>? in which ="trms">historically ="trms">contingent practices of grounding is she grounded, building her discourse='qstn'>?

="trms">ontology of the variable ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="trms">question of the) figure of variation
her work with the partners of crime, getting in the front line and frontiers of ="trms">CG working and practical ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg18" stl="font-size:126%"> ="frds scrmbld">Sofia's textual machine, switching between binary values of faire contract ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> staying with the polar syntax of ‘you’ and ‘them’
="prgrph">-how the rotating axis of her machine is able of creating breaks in the syntax of the contract='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-(for her machine='lgc'>: “understanding='lgc'> = an act of application”) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how new forms of ='strcls'>*understanding='strcls'>* could change the ways we might achieve fair ="trms">societies='qstn'>? and not merely changing the order of sentence to visualize and objectification of unfairness and precariousness of the employment economy, in the exegesis of the ="trms">writen contract. what would it mean to install an understander (taking a risk), for ="frds scrmbld">Sofia, and not a reversal syntaxer (making aware)='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-employer and the employee as ="trms">different “="trms">species” with their ="trms">different “="trms">natural” tendencies to fuck with one another='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> zero-sum game
="prgrph">-the ="trms">question of ="trms">symbiotic relatedness (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> psychoanalysis) ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? contractual relatedness


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

to emphasis on the ="trms">contingent and the contextual

the process of becoming rese="trms"nttrm="search">archer (of ="trms">science and ="trms">technology studies ='lgc'>: inquiry into the politics and practices of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge-making)

vignette (sketch, a brief ="trms">literary description, ="trms">narrate s="trms">cenes from familiar activities)

the ="trms">question is not ‘how can we care more='qstn'>?’ (as predetermined set of ="trms">affective practices) rather='lgc'>: ='strcls'>**what happens to our work when we pay attention to moments where the ="trms">question of ‘how to care='qstn'>?’ is insistent but not easily answerable='strcls'>** (‘care’ as an analytic or provocation)
="prgrph">-="ppl">="ppl">Kenney


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Manoto TV station program “sher yadet nare” شعر یادت نره ="trms">respond to the ="trms">questions of ="trms">translation (from the UK produced program “Don't Forget the Lyrics” into an ="nms">Iranian contemporary popular media culture) and ="trms">memory practices (archival ="trms">memory act performance pop quiz show mixed with ="trms">consumer culture TV broadcasting)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='strcls'>*cognitive companions='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> coordinating multiple ="trms">agencies characteristically)
="prgrph">-tiny clay token sheep were enclosed in clay envelopes with markings indicating what was inside (='strcls'>*molding and inscribing clay='strcls'>* was the favored sensory ="trms">technology for making in Mesopotamia 5000 years ago)
="lsts lst1">•maybe your makings involves “true ="trms">writing” that companions preferentially with ="trms">language
="lsts lst1">•maybe your makings involves spinning plant and ="trms">animal fiber and feeling, tying, and untying knots
="lsts lst1">•processual affirmative re-="trms">writings
="lsts lst1">•="trms">systeming meditations
="lsts lst1">•context-sensitive pushback
="lsts lst1">•operational closure (of a ="trms">system)
="lsts lst1">•fluctuation, entrainment, blocked ="trms">synchrony
="lsts lst1">•
='lgc'>[="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King use of a term, how she shifts it from mechanism to ="trms">affect:='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]stigmergy='lgc'>: feeling of being in among and as the self-organizing bits that are ="trms">system-ing (='lgc'>=/= a ="trms">method of ="trms">communication in emergent ="trms">systems, mechanically defined as “indirect coordination” self-organizing termites and ants or flash mobs or political action)
='at'>@="nms">apass='lgc'>: how do you provide ="trms">different ='strcls'>*undisciplined ways of envisioning='strcls'>* new kinds of environments, artifacts and practices='qstn'>? (entangle design, ="trms">science, fact and ="trms">fiction, boundary objects, ="trms">system-ing, ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]design='lgc'>: ='strcls'>***making things that tell ="trms">stories='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= telling ="trms">stories='lgc'>])
(my encounters with) ="nms">ajayeb's vibrating particularism
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]website, talksite='lgc'>: play, trial and error, permutation and mistakes (none of it innocent or exemplary ='at'>@ERG's website) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*cognitive reassembly='strcls'>*
='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{="trms">relations between developers and users to create and work out a ="trms">technical ="trms">interface ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">communicative tangle='lgc'>}
transmedia ="trms">story (with its o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins commercial and suspect, often entangled with ="trms">social critique and ="trms">social panic ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= conditions of making knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge today; we knowingly or without reflection, gather and pin together such ="trms">stories across media...)
="prgrph">-you can't take ='strcls'>*="trms">citation pools='strcls'>* for granted
="prgrph">-how we will take what each other says
companion gatherings (do not exactly cohere or con="trms">sort well) ='lgc'>==sometimes='lgc'>='lgc'>==> violation of standardization (that some believe is more equal)
(companions need to) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]learn='lgc'>: emergently sensitize and attune among new cognitive and political circumstances (in and as their very moments of unknowing, when ethical and moral ="trms">sortings are properly in flux)
(with) ="ppl">="ppl">Bateson's negative sensitivities to ="trms">systems, and with ="ppl">Katies ="ppl">King, I keep discovering just how ="trms">literal is our many being-ness in multiply embedded ="trms">sorts of biomic ="trms">sym="trms">poiesis

='lgc'>{='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">lecture='lgc'>: feeling-in-the-mouth ="trms">system, (the word-as-="trms">world inhabited by) alternate and overlapping peoples, ="trms">memories, attunements, ="trms">citation pools, ="trms">histories, ="trms">communities of practice, knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges, ocean and freshwater “="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges"='lgc'>}
='lgc'>{='qstn'>?can i propose (="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King and Sandoval's) “op="trms">positional consciousness” instead of (Mouffe's) “agonistic p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">luralism"='lgc'>}

="trms">responses, abilities, infrastructures, distributed ="trms">embodim[...]