[...]r />
(three types of awareness='lgc'>:)
="lstsrd">1- significance of dying and afterlife ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> space time of personal collective destiny
="lstsrd">2- apocalyptic time ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
="lstsrd">3- eschatological ="trms">imagination ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->

purgation

purgatory time
="lsts lst1">•do pottery while you are in purgatory
="lsts lst1">•learn ice-skating while you are waiting in zamharir
="lsts lst1">•

="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> ='lgc'>{personal drama of death ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> progressive un="trms">folding of collective ="trms">history='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ultimate dis="trms">position for individual soul and body ='lgc'>~~> ='thdf'>the notion of ='strcls'>***bliss after torment='strcls'>***

torment='lgc'>: individual glimpse of the end


="ppl">Augustine ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the imperfect but not reprobate

suffering='lgc'>: means of salvation (of we join the agony of Chris on the cross)
pain in this life ='lgc'>: inevitable accompaniment to the corrupt body whose weakness and rottenness are indication of the approach of death

an era of exile ='lgc'>--promise='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a new exodus from human fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure and corruption


='lgc'>[title='lgc'>]
beautitude

Bernard's heaven

painted ="trms">embodiedness of the blessed (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- problematic ='lgc'>+ powerful)

out of time heaven in which the soul is al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready body-shaped ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> somato="trms">morphic selves before judgement


apocalyptic moment ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> self-referentiality='lgc'>: when the ="trms">author reflects on the limits of their knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge and expression

(all) eschatological texts (="trms">poems) in some way reflect their status as ="trms">fiction ='lgc'>--assert='lgc'>='lgc'>--> their ="trms">nature as mediating and ="trms">contingent


xxxxxx

="brkr">
Trans-ing xeno- unsettles the oversimplified Others necessary for the production of stratification and disallowance, without in the process destroying ="trms">difference and the ethics of encounter.

the ="trms">ontological primacy of centers in general
the refracted image

myths of belonging as an ="trms">anthropocentric ="trms">narrative, one is worthy of personhood if she is placed in home.
='lgc'>[in the political and fantasy practices of the most in="trms">heritors of traditions of white (or not-white, the actual color is not the point) settler colonialism and its ="trms">ecologies, the introducing ="trms">species='lgc'>--in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding ourselves='lgc'>--are always bad ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the extraordinary practice of disavowal (of the ‘creatures of the empire’ ='at'>#="ppl">="ppl">Haraway) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in="trms">heriting ='thdf'>the notion of ‘belonging’ and ‘not-belonging’ (in this tradition) disavowal is almost the only way you can “keep” belonging. and one of the ways you practice disavowal and belonging is to exterminate the other (feral pigs, etc.) who “really” don't belong.='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•(which) ='strcls'>*practices of belonging='strcls'>* (are not part of (whose='qstn'>?) dreaming='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they always turn up in family ="trms">stories ='lgc'>{feral ='lgc'>=/= pest='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•how various kinds of ="trms">species can and cannot get on together='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•who should be killed and lived-with='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•(who exists only under the) ="trms">categories that come from the cunning of recognition ='lgc'>[="trms">categories of the traditional, of the subsistence food (ma'ash معاش), of the enacting of a culture in view of tourist public,='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•managed belongingness


In Jean ="ppl">Genet's portrayal of dusk (quoted by Minh-ha 1996:101-102), he captures the ambiguity of this ="trms">transitional time in the expression ‘entre chien et loup,’ between dog and wolf, that is, a time of day when one cannot be distinguished from the other, and he also describes it as ‘the hour of ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphoses when people ‘half hope, half fear’ that a dog will become a wolf’ (our emphasis). This quotation exemplifies the ambiguously ‘unheimlich,’ ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]


security is never secure enough


Jesus knocks at your heart's door


(="trms">history's or pig's) happy ending


absence of ambivalence (in ="trms">animals)

conditions of ad="trms">mission ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> artistic, sexual, ="trms">natural ='strcls'>*selections='strcls'>*
tickets to power-holding cliques that control the resources

="large lg1" stl="font-size:141%">
phantoms of non-destruction
or
phantoms of ‘constructed adequately’


pausing dogs
mixed messages
who is wanted for dinner='qstn'>?
the moment when the message is finally received ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> tech, magic, ethic, ="trms">morph

="trms">poetic ="trms">historiography

pivotal ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading of ancient Greece ='lgc'>='lgc'>--- out of day-dream fantasy


='lgc'>[="ppl">Rickels='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*beauty is ="trms">interested in action
(pure) beauty re-lingering on primary ="trms">narcissism, that's why beauty must be administrated, in proper doses.

(my) ="trms">animal-findings and fairy-tale as="trms">sociations

if dogs ="trms">communicate through their trainability cats redirect lines of ="trms">communication through play. the dog waits and watches, the cat looks and looks, which when is your turn to be looked at, can be therapeutic or unnerving.

meeting the cat half-way



='lgc'>[="ppl">Ingraham='lgc'>]
the house, passed over in ="trms">history, brings with it a great many d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angers
architecture (never touches the object) is enchanted with object discourse
...all of us have been asked to “="trms">instrumentalize” architectural ='lgc'>[or art='lgc'>] theory ="trms">according to a particular building
="trms">material given a structure

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Q ='and'>& A ='qstn'>?, ="trms">interactivity, swarovski party, servants and robots ="trms">interacting with foreign bodies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> feeling at home='qstn'>? ex="trms">cited... ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> disco without bouncers and borders without border check, spaces you can seamlessly in and out, labyrinthine

i am generating some ="trms">vocabularies
parsite and parasitical, not all of them are predatory like the wolf



(Karen ="ppl">="ppl">Barad)
With all mirroring practices, biomimcry has built-in optics on the ="trms">geometry of distance from what which is other.

="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%">
(="ppl">I="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigaray)
surprise (to be new)='lgc'>: not yet assimilated or disassimilated as known
our attention to that which is not yet (en)="trms">coded

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%"> (something to consider, regarding the pigs and wolf ="trms">story, also an ="trms">interest for performances that happen in closed space;) there is a standard account that says ‘="trms">interiors’ and ‘="trms">interiority’ are linked, that the ="trms">articulation of ="trms">interior physical space enabled the development of certain kind of (initially bourgeois European) sense of subjective life='lgc'>--as something sheltered and enclosed.
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">interiority (subjectivity) is linked to the exterior ='lgc'>[="ppl">Sennett='lgc'>]

O='lgc'>-- still in the 15th century (when sex and sleeping was not ="trms">veiled under curtains) there was no cor="trms">relation between ='thdf'>the notion of privacy and the ="trms">interior
O='lgc'>-- in the mid 18th century (among European bourgeoisie) a new ideal of domesticity appeared which ="trms">dictates a new ="trms">interior space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> separate room separate functions, segregation of domestic activities
O='lgc'>-- ="ppl">Rousseau='lgc'>: in the shelter of private domestic space subjectivity is set free (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a ="trms">different kind of subjectivity (one which guards the self, something to be protected from the outside) is enabled by the development of the division of labor in ="trms">interior space) ='lgc'>[this is not merely architectural, it is also something about the clothing people wore='lgc'>: wearing ="trms">different clothes in family or in the realm of str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angers. houses became warmer='lgc'>]

(="ppl">Simmel's) “="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban subjectivity”='lgc'>: street physical over-stimulation ='lgc'>==> wearing a mask, you show nothing to people, you are not there. and behind this mask there is the feelings you are having, and these sensations behind the mask are your subjectivity.
it is a reaction to being exposed to ="trms">difference and complexity
the subject is divided='lgc'>: neutral on the outside / stimulated in the inside

(i don't want to become a camera)
observe (without ="trms">interacting)
observational cruising
='lgc'>[the standard account:='lgc'>] ="trms">interiority ='lgc'>~= reflexive detachment, reflexive withdraw

="trms">social media and exteriority

="large lg5" stl="font-size:157%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Sennett, “3rd ="trms">world” SPeCo62Mz2Q ='lgc'>: condition in which centralized space or distributed ="trms">communication ="trms">networks are missing
="prgrph">-a public space that is officially organized
='strcls'>*parks='lgc'>: open space that are reserved for the public='lgc'>: “where informal economy wants to be but is banned”

='strcls'>*public space='lgc'>: (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Selma on st.open project)
(21st century) ="trms">modern thought ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ='strcls'>*two traditions of thinking about public realm='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1- as a dialogical condition (of exchange, of political engagement) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Arendt ='and'>& ="ppl">Habermas; ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{a ="trms">communicative im="trms">material space='lgc'>} ='lgc'>: “more talk ='lgc'>==> more agreement, common understanding” ='lgc'>='lgc'>---='lgc'>[dialogic ='and'>& im="trms">material='lgc'>]
="lstsrd">2- as a space of ="trms">spectacle ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (goes back to 19th century) ="ppl">Baudelaire's ‘individual passers-by’ watching something on the ="trms">fold (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[old ="trms">Greek idea of ="trms">spectacle:='lgc'>] “un="trms">folding of ="trms">narrative.” a ='thdf'>bad idea of ‘how people should be physic[...]