[...] of comprehensive theoretical political ="trms">position ='lgc'>[without giving up the labor-intensive work of theory='lgc'>]


(to talk about...) as an abstraction of ="trms">seriousness
='strcls'>*if one is really ="trms">serious about the kinds of ="trms">interupted and entangled abstractions it is no longer good enough to do it from the ="trms">Greeks-on='strcls'>*
(not scolding post-colonial but actually) not to let philosophy or ="trms">science or any other rest of it any longer be that unmarked set of ="trms">categories
='strcls'>*="trms">situated ground='lgc'>: that we know something='strcls'>*
(not to let='lgc'>:) ‘not to know something’ (about living and arriving at the time of human-induced mass-extermination and mass-genocide) as the only way of being a ="trms">serious person ='lgc'>~ extinguish abstractions in order to act
='lgc'>[learning from ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">="ppl">Latour:='lgc'>] ‘to take something ="trms">seriousness’ is not to run off and explain it by something else, is to be at risk to it's ‘thisness,’ to be available to it, to be undone and redone at encounter ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> specualtive thought
(always asking) what other abstractions are to think with='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[my ="trms">interest in the ="trms">past ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>] your head screwed backward, not so much looking for relevant novelty ='lgc'>[and not in search for meaning='lgc'>] (not so of ="trms">past but also) not quite so enamored of the new and of the creative
="prgrph">-extinctions are happening at extraordinary rate that are difficult to deal with the perceptual ="trms">apparatuses of the bipedal hominid ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for example sayinig ‘everything is collapsing’ is one of those ="trms">categories, collapsology takes ="trms">world's doom as a ="trms">priori='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? production of novelty, product of novelty ='lgc'>[that you need is not at all novelty for someone else='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? reduction of ="trms">memory, production of ="trms">memory
="lsts lst1">•knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? cat's cradling each other
='strcls'>*what constitute flourishing='qstn'>?='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='at'>@collapsology ='lgc'>=/= one is seduced, curious, ="trms">interested, and int="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigued ‘to what is going on there='qstn'>?'='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[="trms">species are often='lgc'>] risks for your ="trms">ongoingness
(work of) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]hope='lgc'>: care not being possible out of the place of sheer joy

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> my issues with the commons
i have a problem with the conceptual and ="trms">material ="trms">apparatus called ‘resource’ that the commons takes un="trms">interrogated. (and there is no way out of it because commons must take ‘a’ de="trms">finition of resource for granted='lgc'>--and that makes it too easy to deconstruct). and it is too embedded within a political framework and ="trms">vocabulary. and political is the most difficult syntax to start with, which won't allow it to access other ="trms">literacies.
in this way the commons alone cannot properly address issues such as pollution, extinction, human-="trms">animal problems, ="trms">rhetoric, in="trms">heritance, logic, alienation, and so on, that need multidisciplinary thinking.

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="lsts lst1">•what is ‘feeling’ for ="frds scrmbld">Lili
="lsts lst1">•the issue of ‘similarity’ for ="frds scrmbld">Luiza
="lsts lst1">•zones of connectivity and presubjective singularities for ="frds scrmbld">Xiri. (what is even better than justice='qstn'>? kindness='qstn'>?)
(="frds scrmbld">Xiri's use of the implicit element of ‘surprise,’ she is trying to ="trms">communicate the ‘importance’ of her contents.) (trauma-="trms">story almost always silences other ="trms">stories. ='lgc'>-- she is compelled by her own ="trms">storytelling ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> baring witness to the injustice therefore resisting it.) ='lgc'>--when the victimized personal ="trms">veils the larger context of evil, the illusion of the true perpetrators - which is around you. (she stated the d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger which is all around us.)
="prgrph">-the issue of immediacy for ="frds scrmbld">Xiri
="prgrph">-‘you can only heal what you have wounded’ (Wagner's Parsifal “only the weapon that made it will ever cure the wound.”)='lgc'>--what does this mean for our caring activities='qstn'>? ='at'>@="frds">Sina='lgc'>: is this what you mean by western ="trms">modern rationalization, and ='thdf'>that is why you are thinking within the western/eastern philosophies, is the ="trms">modern tools the antidote to themselves='qstn'>? (this is too soon for me to say and understand this ="trms">question.)

what is my ‘will to’='qstn'>?
="frds scrmbld">Xiri wants to abolish injustice='qstn'>?
="frds scrmbld">Thiago, abolish selfishness='qstn'>?
="frds scrmbld">Maarten, abolish weakness='qstn'>?
="frds scrmbld">Aela, abolish entropy='qstn'>?
="frds scrmbld">Sana,
="frds scrmbld">Seba, abolish enmity='qstn'>?
="frds scrmbld">Lili, abolish feelings='qstn'>?
="frds scrmbld">Varinia, abolish obedience='qstn'>? ='lgc'>[='lgc'>--what shortens our leash='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="frds">Sina, abolish selfhood='qstn'>?
="frds scrmbld">Vladimir, abolish non-disambiguity='qstn'>?

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Esta, her ="trms">enunciated need for “framework” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~->='qstn'>? ="trms">instruments of economization='lgc'>], could she be needing “pathway”='lgc'>: path instead of frame, and way instead of work. ='lgc'>[frame ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? overflowing (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> my ="trms">method of script='qstn'>?); identity ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? avidity, hers;='lgc'>]
="trms">interplay of scales
the scale of intimacy, (of skin, of shared heartbeats and feelings)
="trms">data and sur="trms">veillance and seduction
intimacy='lgc'>: still an unpre="trms">dictable force='qstn'>?
intimacy='lgc'>: the biological spring from which ="trms">affect drinks='qstn'>?
how ="frds scrmbld">Esta's proposal is capable of ="trms">traversing from the ="trms">lovers’ bed to the ="trms">wild embrace of the crowd to the alien touch of ="trms">networks='qstn'>?

='lgc'>[and when i say “abolish,” i am using a word that is about rendering something obsolete, mansukh, canceling, making ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading to get rid of it, and this is not the same as destroying.='lgc'>]

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Arianna, ‘cleaning ="trms">agents,’ to toxicity='qstn'>? how can we learn to live with “toxic ="trms">animacy”(="ppl">Chen)='qstn'>? dirt='lgc'>: “consequences overwhelming their cause” (="ppl">="ppl">Latour)
="prgrph">-="trms">narratives about urgent necessity='lgc'>: that we need to understand more in order to cure, prevent, construct, excel, survive.
='strcls'>*afterlife toxicities (='qstn'>?)

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Lili='lgc'>: cycle of planets instead of heartbeat of a planet. tuning in the soup of planets, instead of getting the pulse of a singular planet. the nebulous milk way of liquid bodies, instead of ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid mass of individual blood='lgc'>--Pluto.

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Varinia='lgc'>: (in her dog video, regarding her engagement with the law and the ="trms">question of comparative thinking='lgc'>:) what is the model for what, what is similar to what='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-is her model based on ='thdf'>the idea that beings exist as individual='qstn'>? (is this a ‘="trms">difference’ that her work produces='qstn'>?)

='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Agnes='lgc'>: you are a ="trms">response to the bed, making the bed and being made by its caress and embrace. it is not that you want all the audience in the ="trms">world to identify with a general ="trms">question or ="trms">present this as a universal expression, but what could go beyond localization is precisely this concept that you, like me, ="trms">transitioning body in your environment (bed or whatever) are outstretches of homeliness and forces that distribute across space and discourse, territories and sensing zones, you are an exchange between self and environment. this is ="trms">pragmatism. like the variety of bed sheets, we are proposed with answers that vary, before posing any ="trms">question.
to re="trms">formulate the ="trms">question that was posed to you='lgc'>: how your proposal is capable of ="trms">traversing from the bed to the ="trms">wild='qstn'>?

="large lg1" stl="font-size:144%">
pre-="trms">historic personhood

='mywrk'>my work is concerned with connections, mediation and passages.


what you take for granted, is in another words, what that you can't not know.


(my proposal='lgc'>:)
the ="trms">past is not absolute!

the idea is that the mythical became the mythological ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Things could be treasured for their beauty as opposed to
their utility or their numinousness.


(="ppl">Martha ="ppl">="ppl">Kenney's) “="trms">wild facts”
facts that won't hold still
="trms">fables
="trms">fables of ="nms">ajayeb, creatures of ="trms">imaginations, (im)possible ="trms">worlds

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

your institutional hacks


three things to consider in ='mywrk'>my work='lgc'>:
projection, immersion, and synthesis

seeking to be at once inside and outside the topic

the issue of topology ='lgc'>-- what remains invariant as a result of transformation

sug="trms">gestive power of the figure

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> synthesis ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? genesis (to o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginate something, to design)
genesis ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? apocalypse

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

in research, contrast between ="trms">method and subject, is a tool
(in studying ="trms">natural ="trms">history)

="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%"> in critique, contrast between effect and ="trms">affect, is a tool
(assumed quality of the object and one's own named experience)
='lgc'>[these tools are perhaps cognitive objects='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Enlightenment as cultural European ="trms">phenomenon versus a ="trms">scientific British one

(the theatrical function of ="trms">natural philosophy in the England Enlightenment)

="large lg5" stl="font-size:143%"> the function of ="trms">natural philosopher in 18th century was to use experimental ="trms">science machines to turn inert ="trms">matter into active power, light/fire/heat/etc. to ="trms">lecture an wealthy and polite fee-paying audience, in order to save them from irrationality, that inside all ="trms">matter there is life and power, and that life was divine.

(however all this was all swept away in the industrial revelation)

William Herschel, an amateur ="trms">natural[...]