[...] /> ="lsts lst1">•mediation

apperception ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature of intuition ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (a mobile and dynamic) conception of will ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> motor activity

19th century='lgc'>:
attention='lgc'> = will
character='lgc'> = unity
attention ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> mind ='lgc'>--='lgc'>{attention is plainly the essential condition of the formation and development of mind='lgc'>}, ="trms">systematic acquirement of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, for the control of passions and emotions
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> powerful accounts of the ="trms">nature of human subjectivity


practical or knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ="trms">world of objects (the berlin ="trms">naturkunde museum)

attention became part of the ="trms">dense ="trms">network of institutional discourses/practices around which “the truth of perception was organised and structured”
not part of a “regime of power” rather part of a space in which new conditions of subjectivity were ="trms">articulated

19th century reconceptualization of attention='lgc'>: inevitable fragmentation of a visual field, an activity of ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion, of rendering parts of a perceptual field unperceived ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lstsrd">1. attention as expression of the conscious will of an autonomous subject, as free choice, part of that subject's self-constituting freedom
="lstsrd">2. attention as a function of biologically determined instinct, shaped our lived ="trms">relation to environment
="lstsrd">3. attentive subject could be produced and managed through the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge and control of external procedures of stimulation='lgc'>: ="trms">technologies of attraction ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> formative component of a ="trms">modernized mass visual culture (in the West)='lgc'>: strategies of engaging an attentive ="trms">spectator='lgc'>: comedians smirking at the camera, ="trms">gesturing conjurers in magic film ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a cinema that displays its visibility, rupturing a self-enclosed ="trms">fictional ="trms">world for a chance to solicit the attention of the ="trms">spectator; Gunning 1990='lgc'>]

="ppl">Hegel's understanding of attention as “the beginning of education”

(rationalizing possibilities of) psychometrics
a site of quantification
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> subjective operations of repression and anesthetization ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud

the model of an attentive human observer
compatible with ="trms">technical conditions, insignificant “="trms">interior” faculty, a set of effects that could be ="trms">measured externally
(="trms">technological transformation of physiology and psychology in the 19th century, development of electrophysiology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cultural ="trms">history of electricity)


behaviour with a ="trms">historical structure='lgc'>: a behaviour ="trms">articulated in terms of ="trms">socially determined norms and is part of the formation of a ="trms">modern ="trms">technological milieu

1879, Wundt's psychology laboratory in Leipzig, one of the practical and discursive spaces within ="trms">modernity in which human beings “problematized what they are.” ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault/
(Wundt's account defined attention ='lgc'>[= will='lgc'>] as one of the highest ="trms">integrative functions ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ='at'>#="trms">integrative in ="ppl">Sennett='lgc'>], its essential role in producing an effective unity of consciousness)


part of the cultural logic of capitalism ="trms">demands that we accept as ="trms">natural switching our attention rapidly from one thing to another ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (capitalism as a) regime of reciprocal attentiveness and distraction


conceptualizer of a new economic and ="trms">social space based on the quantification and distribution of energy='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•Wener von Siemens
="lsts lst1">•Lord Kelvin='lgc'>: globalization of telegraphic ="trms">communication and subsequently in the commodification and ="trms">marketing of electric power (in England) ='lgc'>[telegraph='lgc'>: a ="trms">world of anonymous, decontextualized information; moved ="trms">history into the background and amplified the instant and ="trms">simultaneous ="trms">present/person='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•Edison='lgc'>: ="trms">transition to centralised corporate capitalism (in late 19th century)='lgc'>: his role in the emergence of a new ="trms">system of quantification and distribution, a ="trms">system for trans="trms">mission and reception as abstract processes, ways in which a space of ="trms">consumption and circulation could be dynamized/activated ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">social field of individual subjects could be arranged into increasingly separate and specialized units (of ="trms">consumption)
“Edison was a ho="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic conceptualizer and determined solver of the problems as="trms">sociated with the growth of ="trms">systems” (="ppl">="ppl">Crary > Hughes)
Edison is paradigmatic='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*the indistinction between information and visual images, and the making of quantifiable and abstract flow into the object of attentive ="trms">consumption. his grasp of some of the ="trms">systemic features of capitalism (in 1880s and 1890s) underscores the abstract ="trms">nature of the products he “invented”. his work is inseparable from the continual manufacturer of new needs and the consequent restructuring of the ="trms">network of ="trms">relations in which such products would be ="trms">consumed='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> other participants in the same ="trms">historical project of perpetual rationalization and ="trms">modernization='lgc'>: Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Andrew Grove, etc.

(kinetoscope and phonograph logic='lgc'>:) the structuring of perceptual experience in terms of a solitary rather than a collective subject ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> today's computer screen as the primary vehicle for the distribution and ="trms">consumption (of electronic commodities)

(late 20th century) management of attention ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- capacity of an observer to adjust to continual repatterning of the ways in which a sensory ="trms">world can be ="trms">consumed
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda


ADD
dubious classification of an attentive deficit disorder ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> durability of attention (posed as ='lgc'>[implicitly='lgc'>] ="trms">natural function) as a normative ="trms">category of institutional power
="prgrph">-="trms">social construction of illness
="prgrph">-now ADD is not linked to any weakness of the will
="prgrph">-in adults='lgc'>: any economic shortcoming or ="trms">social insecurity is now understandable in terms of a fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure to apply oneself attentively to the ideologically determined standards of performance and “achievement”
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in a culture that is so relentlessly founded on a short attention span, on the logic of the nonsequitur, on perceptual overload, on the ="trms">generalized ethic of “getting ahead,” on the celebration of aggressiveness, (="ppl">="ppl">Crary poses that it is nonsensical to pathologize attention in this culture, a double bind, in which the individual is caught between subjective dislocations of ="trms">modernization and imperative for institutional discipline and productivity)


(Miller ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Zoumana) ...the unconscious as part of a ="trms">system in which ‘automatic’ behaviour was reciprocally ="trms">intertwined with the changing needs of conscious activity, in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding attention. in contrast to the custodial ="ppl">Freudian ="trms">interpretation, many 19th century psychologists saw the unconscious as “actively generating the processes which are ="trms">integral to ="trms">memory, perception, and behaviour. its contents are inaccessible not, as in psychoanalytic theory, because they are held in strenuously preventive detention but, more ="trms">interestingly, because the effective implementation of cognition and conduct does not actually require comprehensive awareness.

="ppl">Darwin='lgc'>: a certain kind of reactive attention was believed to be an essential part of human biology, ="trms">systematic ="trms">response to novel stimuli (visual, olfactory, or auditory)
="prgrph">-an attentive observer might appear motionless
="prgrph">-an ideo-motor ="trms">network of forces ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that which immobilizes


(the structural psychology of) as="trms">sociationism (theories of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge)

institutional discourse
="trms">techniques of the subject

attention (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= will) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/= consciousness
(noncoincidence of attention with consciousness)
='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="trms">modern shift to semantic and ="trms">semiotic frameworks of analysis
(from ="trms">epistemology ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> hermeneutics ='lgc'>: ="ppl">Mallarme, ="ppl">Nietzsche, ="ppl">Peirce, ="ppl">Wittgenstein, ="ppl">Heidegger ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">question of how a subject is provisionally constructed through ="trms">language and other ="trms">systems of ="trms">social meaning and value ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> termination of various analysis of consciousness ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">epistemological crisis


observer (once understood in terms of the essential subjectivity of vision) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> attention became constitutive (and destabilizing) component of perception


unmediated givenness of sense ="trms">data ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cognition

="trms">community of ="trms">interpretation ='lgc'>: a shifting and ="trms">intervening space of ="trms">socially ="trms">articulated psychological functions, institutional imperative, and a wide range of ="trms">techniques, practices, and discourses relating to the perceptual experience of a subject in time ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> forms of exteriority in ="trms">modernity's account of perception


eschatological dream of 19th century ='lgc'>: “to make this knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of man exist so that man could be liberated by it from his alienation, liberated from all the determinations of which he was not the master” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> one made of man an object of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge so that man could become subject of his own liberty and of his own existence
="prgrph">-="ppl">="ppl">Foucault
exercise of a sovereign and attentive will ='lgc'>[we see this in ="ppl">Olearius='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> claiming subject's self-possession ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> conscious organizer of that perceptible ="trms">world ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> master

(="ppl">Nietzsche='lgc'>:) “i am free” ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “he must obey” ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the inward certainty that obedience will be rendered ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ ='strcls'>*ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively='lgc'>: (the unconditional evaluation that) ‘this and nothing else is necessary now’

co-="trms">presence of the ="trms">world (can never be guaranteed ='lgc'>[by ="trms">scientific psychology='lgc'>])
='lgc'><='lgc'>== attentiveness is continuous with distraction, reverie, dis="trms">sociation, trance,

='at'>@="nms">apass, work on attention is so ="trms">interesting because it is part of the ="trms">history of modality of contemplation about processes and activities of the body


the neo-="ppl">Kantian legacy of a dis="trms">interested ="trms">aesthetic perception ='lgc'>--desire='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to escape bodily time (and its vagaries)
="lsts lst1">•(="ppl">Hume's) artist='lgc'>: someone in whom “="trms">nature has forgotten to attach their faculty for perception to their faculty for action” (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- sounds familiar='qstn'>? “free” artistic perception)
="lsts lst1">•(for Roger Fry='lgc'>:) “="trms">imaginative life” is about contemplation disconnected from the possibility of action (='lgc'>=/= instinctive reactions to sensible objects and their accompanying emotions ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ="trms">animal)='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a bad ="trms">fable
="trms">modernist art='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*timeless perception='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[formal conditions of the possibility of vision, pure form operates as a principle of structure, Krauss outlines how temporality is ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluded='lgc'>] ='lgc'>=/= mundane or quotidian forms of seeing or ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening ='lgc'>[the object bounded by its c="trms">ontours, spurred/hated by ="trms">modernism='lgc'>]


whenever we try to look at or ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listen to one thing for too long the attention (containing within itself the conditions for its own dis="trms">integration) inevitably reaches a threshold at which it breaks down='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- a game i used to play as a ="trms">child, playing with attention and distraction, mutating myself into a state of trance or autohypnosis, absorbed, diverted, nebulous ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">socially adaptive subject='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*perceptual identity='strcls'>* (of its object) begins to deteriorate (& paralysis of will='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>[_='thdf'>that is why in ="trms">spectacle visual regimes the duration of perception must be regulated in short ="trms">intervals='lgc'>]

attention is thermodynamic ='lgc'>: a given force could assume more than ine form
partial sleep ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> abnormal fixation


(i am cautious at every turn to capture my own) ='strcls'>*experience of distraction='strcls'>* is part of ="nms">ajayeb studies. because it has to do with modes of attention and its persian ="trms">history

perception is a dream

(an account of) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">modernity='lgc'>: a process of fragmentation and destruction in which pre="trms">modern forms of wholeness and ="trms">integrity were irretrievably broken up or degraded through ="trms">technological, ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban, and economic reorganization
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a “decay” in the capacity for perception ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- to be careful in working for ="nms">ajayeb not to romanticize (elitist and regressive fantasy of ="trms">communal ="trms">relations in) pre="trms">modern modalities of looking/="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening as richer, deeper, or more valuable ='lgc'>:
="trms">modern ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban life as “swift and continuous shift of external and ="trms">internal stimuli” ='lgc'>=/= pre="trms">modern's “slower, more habitual, more smoothly flowing rhythm of the sensory-mental phase"='lgc'>]

(sensory mental schema)


understanding of distraction within a larger deterioration of experience

="prgrph">-distraction (not as a product of decay or ="trms">anthropy, rather) as a mean to overcome bankruptcy of bourgeois ="trms">aesthetic (late 19th century)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Benjamin='lgc'>: absorbed contemplation purified of the ="trms">excess stimuli of ="trms">modernity
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Adorno='lgc'>: distraction as regression='lgc'>: perception that is “arrested in the infantile ="trms">stage” ='lgc'>=/= “deep concentration”
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Rilke='lgc'>: authentic attention as precious and rare survival of the lost ideal of artistic absorption in work now exiled to the margins of mechanized and ="trms">routinized ="trms">world
="lsts lst1">•Rodin='lgc'>: gazing of the handworker
="prgrph">-
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “reception in a state of distraction”, (='lgc'><='lgc'>== absorption is psychologically grounded perception) ='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">="ppl">Crary arguing that attention and distraction ceaselessly flowing into one another on the same continuum (of ="trms">social field)



='lgc'>[tales of understanding='lgc'>]-='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•what are the cognites of ‘contemplation’ (in german or ="trms">farsi)='qstn'>?
the theological resonances of this latinate word ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> contemplation='lgc'>: viewing/considering with continued attention; going into the temple, into the sphere of the holy, into the deep roots of things, into their creative ground


(to oppose) contemporary modes of distraction
="trms">modern forms of ="trms">interiority, absorption, psychic isolation

Riegl's dream of a ="trms">world in which art would be inseparable from an ="trms">imaginary democratic harmony of individual and ="trms">community (='lgc'>=/= ="nms">harem)

collective attention (central attentive mass audience, 1900) ='lgc'>: cinema

rational attention='lgc'>: attention linked to thought, one's telescope on object

(for ="ppl">Nietzsche='lgc'>:) attention='lgc'>: possibility of an absorption ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> forgetting ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> life-affirmative ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “focusing on the ="trms">present moment”

final virtue of ="trms">modern man='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*="trms">presence of mind='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--="ppl">Nietzsche='lgc'>='lgc'>--> necessary part of the (="trms">cosmopolitan) individual's functioning within a ="trms">modern ="trms">world of economic facts and qualities ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready at ="trms">response to the machine, af="trms">finity with the ="trms">technical, athletic political (='at'>#="trms">integration tale)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the (="trms">serious) ="trms">modern soul is directed towards the news, focusing on the ="trms">present, to employ the moment (='at'>#="trms">presentism ='at'>#="trms">past-studies)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">fable of “to be at the ="trms">present moment”
="lsts lst1">•="trms">fable of “to adapt yourself”

perceptual acceleration of ="trms">modernized ="trms">social field (work ='lgc'>+ leisure) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> new ='strcls'>*="trms">cosmopolitan individual='strcls'>* (who receives signals from many fars and nears, ="trms">="trms">equipped to ‘attend’ to messages and participate in their circulation ☆ ='at'>#face="trms">book='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> diffuse ="trms">anxiety of the other-directed person ='lgc'>: gyroscope ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> radar)

="ppl">Arendt='lgc'>:
="trms">modernity='lgc'>: fabricating rendered meaningless ='lgc'>=/= contemplation='lgc'>: beholding the truth

‘life='lgc'> = being’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ‘contemplation='lgc'> = truth’


="ppl">Heidegger ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> characterization of ="trms">Greek's primordial self-disclosing look ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> makes ="trms">presence possible ='lgc'>+ glaring predatory look ='lgc'>--of='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">modern subjects='lgc'> = objects of conquest


dystopian ="trms">story='lgc'>: a promising outburst (always of human) activity ='lgc'>[such as ="trms">science or exploration or artificial intelligence, etc.='lgc'>] that leads in the most deadlines sterile passivity ='lgc'>[such as alien predation, industrialisation of mind, global contamination, etc.='lgc'>]
(theatricalization of ="trms">scientific mistake in the Handmaid TV series='lgc'>: ="trms">scientific human progress failing ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> abolishing the distinction between private and public consciousness ='lgc'>}='lgc'><='lgc'>-- optics of ="trms">narcissistic scepticism ='lgc'><='lgc'>== psychological shock of the temporality of process)


19th century='lgc'>: ="ppl">Schopenhauer's early grasp of the link between attention and perceptual dis="trms">integration
(for ="ppl">Schopenhauer='lgc'>: ='lgc'>[cognitive chaos of='lgc'>] cultural ="trms">modernity='lgc'>:) temporality ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> subjective anguish


='lgc'>[title='lgc'>]
the timing of intellect

(how come usually intellect does not have time='qstn'>? leaps out of time)


(chaotic successiveness of) perceptions are rendered intellectually coherent ='lgc'>--(="ppl">Schopenhauer)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (unmotivated movement of the) will holds them together ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= body='lgc'>: will's most immediate objectified form
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (="trms">modernism's) looking='lgc'>: a purified perception suspended from time and the body's economy


telegram, Face="trms">book
extremely heterogeneous mixture of fragments of re="trms">presentations of every kind constantly crossing one another
="prgrph">-ceaseless pulsing and animations of the body ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> temporality of the bodies in ="nms">Tehran
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> possibility of subjective reflection (in a ="ppl">Cartesian sense) ='and'>& as="trms">sociation of discrete elements


distraction ='lgc'><='lgc'>--sug="trms">gesting='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">sublimation


(from ="ppl">Descartes to ="ppl">Kant) consciousness/cogito='lgc'> = ground of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge and certitude (= self-="trms">present subject) ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Schopenhauer recognizing) ending the un="trms">questioned foundational ="trms">priority of consciousness ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> attention (emerges as a problem)


broken attention
(idea for video documentation='lgc'>: a lagging mirror attached in front of the camera's lenses)



(a ="trms">fable)

looking out the window
perceive a landscape
light of consciousness
distribute over the landscape
then i try
to apprehend a single tree branch
the consciousness that the rest of the landscape was deployed then fades
diminishes into as="trms">sociational debris
into disappearance of re="trms">presentations

real nexus of psychic life
permeated colored enlivened feelings
distribution of feelings
the gradual un="trms">folding
efforts of attention
are forms of volitional activity
impulsive energy to individual imagery
permit them to fade away
therefore, the tree branch, the window, is a process

Dilthey


in ="ppl">Peirce='lgc'>:
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]attention='lgc'> = anti-optical act of selection ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= (in traditional ="trms">epistemological thought) singling out a contemplative object='lgc'>], “the power by which thought at one time is connected with and made to relate to thought at another time”
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*firstness='lgc'>: self-immediacy, absolute ="trms">presence (before synthesis and ="trms">differentiation) ='lgc'>~ nonreferenciality (='lgc'>=/= perception, attention ="trms">consumed/constituted in time ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= continuous quantity='lgc'> = ='strcls'>*secondness)


using a more act-oriented term “thought” instead of “consciousness”

dis="trms">sociation
anaesthesia
="trms">hallucination
multiple selves
='lgc'>--James='lgc'>='lgc'>--> temporal model of mind='lgc'>: ‘stream’
(='lgc'>=/= scenic model of mind)
='lgc'>[this was part of a larger institutional field in which ="trms">scientific psychology generally was abandoning ‘elemental’ conceptions of consciousness in favour of operational or functional models='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> observer='lgc'>: an artist confronted with the primordial chaos of sensation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (ethics of) overlapping common choices (made of autonomous subjects ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> you can see James seeking to lessen the shock of recent works in ="trms">science and psychology for an American middle-class ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readership='lgc'>])
(William James='lgc'>:) irreducible p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of experience ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (think in terms of) fluidity and immobilization



='mywrk'>my work is usually unformed and informal='lgc'>: a speaking properly in terms of irradiated strata, an aggregate


emergence of increasingly powerful ="trms">technologies and institutions that would determine and enforce ='strcls'>*externally='strcls'>* the objects of attention for mass population ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">history of cinema
="lsts lst1">•disciplinary framework='lgc'>: it is the aim of the teacher to fix the attention of the pupils ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> habit of attention becomes amenable to the will of the teacher



attention was an indispensable component of the “normal” and “rational” subject of the late 19th century industrial ="trms">society, yet had a disturbing proximity to “pathological” and “irrational” effects.
="prgrph">-="ppl">="ppl">Crary

="ppl">Simondon, mold ='and'>& modulation
="ppl">Deleuze, on ="trms">fold

by the end of 19th century attention became an inadequate simulation of (an Archimedean) point of stability from which consciousness could know the ="trms">world ='lgc'>[rather='lgc'>] it opened to flux and absence (='lgc'>=/= perceptual fixity, certainty of ="trms">presence) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> subject-object scattered provisional existence


(extreme model of a) ='strcls'>*="trms">technology of attention='strcls'>* ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Zoumana ='lgc'>[spiritism, ='strcls'>*action at a distance='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> curse, ,='lgc'>]
hypnosis ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> unsettling outlines of of a subject whose makeup could evade both intellectual and institutional mastery ='lgc'>+ precariousness and malleability of (what had been thought of as) consciousness

hypnosis adjacent to attention='qstn'>?! intense refocusing and narrowing of attention ='lgc'>+ inhibition of motor ="trms">responses

focalization='lgc'>: concentrating one's attention on some ="trms">specific object

sustained looking at a single point (i used to do as a ="trms">child) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> dramatic reorganization of consciousness


="ppl">="ppl">Crary in his ="trms">book, Suspension of Perception, shows how high ="trms">science and peripheral pseudo="trms">science never had clear-cut distinctions in the 19th century. that there were a complex and shifting ="trms">relation of ="trms">mutual exchange between the “luminous” physics with a huge range of other “darker” ideas about ‘action in a distance’ enacted in spiritism
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Zoumana


hypnosis ='and'>& sug="trms">gestion ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> automatic processes (inferior, more instinctual, continuous with ="trms">animality), “mental decapitation” ='lgc'>=/= ration elicit patient with conscious participating will power ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">="ppl">Star Wars will of the weaker and less independent, powerful ="trms">natures exercise over weaker ones, jedi ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> strance states (of the weaker ones)='lgc'>: being ="trms">instrument of undisguised power ='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Stengers='lgc'>='lgc'>--> deviant types of behavioural control='lgc'>]
(hypnosis still being rese="trms"nttrm="search">arched on but) ideologically could not be acknowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edged as a constitutive part of human ="trms">sciences
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (stigmata of critical ="trms">position ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali; follow it in ="ppl">Marxism='lgc'>]='lgc'>:)
volitional human action modified by external forces

="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali's tacit appeal to state secret, military secret ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> importance of low-level effects of sug="trms">gestion and influence in contemporary global culture (="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali's ="trms">interest)
the role ‘sug="trms">gestion’ plays in a ="trms">society of ="trms">communication ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the effects of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">fashion
="lsts lst1">•="trms">mimesis
="lsts lst1">•mass psychology
="lsts lst1">•media-related contagions
='lgc'>+ influences of all kind ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “="trms">oblige” us
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>the ='thdf'>assumption that attention can be controlled for ="trms">specific ends

(over a hundred years) underpinning institutional strategies has been the ="trms">position that ='strcls'>*human subjects have determinate psychological capacities and functions that might be susceptible to ="trms">technological management='strcls'>*

attention has been both='lgc'>: strategy of control ='and'>& locus of resistance and drift


(by the end of 20th century) the attentive subject is part of an ‘="trms">internalization’ of disciplinary imperative ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> individuals are made more directly ="trms">responsible for their own efficient or profitable utilization


="ppl">="ppl">Foucault's ="trms">society of discipline
="ppl">Guy ="ppl">Debord's ="trms">society of ="trms">spectacle

(="ppl">Guy ="ppl">Debord's) ='strcls'>*="trms">spectacle='lgc'>: a development of a ="trms">technology of separation='strcls'>*, ='lgc'>[multiple strategies of isolation='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (capitalism's restructuring of) ="trms">society without ="trms">community
='lgc'>+
(="ppl">="ppl">Foucault's) ='lgc'>[production of='lgc'>] docile bodies ='lgc'>~='lgc'>{ body='lgc'> = political force ='lgc'>}
='lgc'>+
(='lgc'><='lgc'>== Weber's) inner isolation of individual ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>==> capita="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list ="trms">modernity='lgc'>]

management of attention is masscultural forms has to do (less with the visual contents and much more) with a larger ='strcls'>**strategy of the individual='strcls'>** ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
="trms">spectacle='lgc'>:
='lgc'>[='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> looking at images='lgc'>]
='lgc'>-='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (construction of conditions that) individuate, immobilize, separate subjects
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
attention ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> operation of noncoercive forms of power

(="ppl">="ppl">Crary='lgc'>:) optical/="trms">technological objects ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> arrangement of bodies in space (='lgc'>--="trms">modernism='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">techniques of separation)

television ='lgc'>+ personal computer ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> anti-nomadic procedures (that fix and striate) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> rendering bodies controllable and useful ='lgc'>+ simulation of choices and ="trms">interactivity
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (Williams='lgc'>: a ="trms">technological and logic of) ='strcls'>*mobile privatization='strcls'>*

(through the assessment of the works of ="ppl">Deleuze and ="ppl">Guattari, and now popular ="trms">narratives) the ="trms">relation between human and machine is based on ="trms">internal, ="trms">mutual ="trms">communication, and no longer on usage or action (='lgc'>~ human operator linked to a machine as an exterior object) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~/=='qstn'>? companion ="trms">species='lgc'>]


irresistible imperative of ="trms">communication ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> continuous effects of control

panoptic ="trms">techniques ='and'>& attentive imperatives (function reciprocally)

classical power='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•repression
="lsts lst1">•ideology
="lsts lst1">•
="trms">modern power='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•normalization
="lsts lst1">•modulation
="lsts lst1">•modelling
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*information that bear on='lgc'>:
="lsts lst2">◦="trms">language
="lsts lst2">◦perception
="lsts lst2">◦desire
="lsts lst2">◦movement
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> by way of microassemblages
(= ='strcls'>*subjectification='strcls'>*)

="prgrph">-the shape of absentmindedness in my performances is skewed by the attentive imperative of ="trms">modern subjectification='qstn'>? something unfocused, ='strcls'>**something ="trms">folds back against itself='strcls'>** ='lgc'>=/= “processing” a stream of heterogeneous stimuli (in film, radio, television, cyberspace)
="prgrph">-my audience felt an uncomfortable sense of their own inattentiveness (in my performances of the experience of dis="trms">sociation, of temporality incompatible with capita="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list patterns of flow). what is they are asking me is to give a stream of heterogeneous stimuli ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>****how temporality is inhabited='strcls'>****


to diffuse (="trms">societies of ="trms">spectacle) into (a single) ="trms">integrated ="trms">society of ="trms">spectacle (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> separate, isolated, but not introspective individuals)


(film and television in competition with) ='strcls'>*daydream='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a domain of resistance ="trms">internal to any ="trms">system of coercion ='lgc'>[='qstn'>?='lgc'>]='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
(='qstn'>?is capitalism's contemporary arrangement allowing/playing an) oscillation between ="trms">spectacular attentiveness and the free play of subjective absorption
='lgc'>~ info/telematic ="trms">systems simulating the possibility of drift ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> modes of sedentarization
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">="ppl">Crary asks) how creative modes of trance, inattention, daydream, and fixation can flourish in the ="trms">interstices of these circuits='qstn'>? ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Sven ...amid ="trms">technological forms of boredom ='lgc'>~ ='strcls'>*="trms">modern boredom='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cognitive and perceptual synthesis. boredom is involved with the intensification of a sense of selfhood='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> romantic (turned inside out='qstn'>?)='lgc'>]


='strcls'>*perception without awareness='strcls'>* (vilified in art and criticism)
='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> automaticity='lgc'>: performance under conditions of divided attention

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Manet='lgc'>: disengagement of perception from a model of ="trms">interiority
Manet's painting discloses some of the important recon="trms">figurations of the status of the observer (that had occurred by the middle of 19th century)

my ="ppl">Olearius video ="trms">figuratively re="trms">positions the observing subject outside of the term of which ="trms">system of vision='qstn'>?
="trms">world ="trms">present to the subject in ="trms">relations of reflection='qstn'>?

...three observers by the virtue of their unmediated, unobstructed self-="trms">presence

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%"> ='lgc'>=/= ='strcls'>*romanticism='lgc'>: (maintained) resistance to externality='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[compare Manet's balcony with Goya's painting Majas on a Balcony='lgc'>]

(Manet's palette cor="trms">responding to) the luminous wavelengths of a new ="trms">technological life="trms">world...

Manet dramatizing (but not lamenting) the evaporation of a cohesive ="trms">world...
(finely assembled) architecture of solitude and separation ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] in a space of a newly ="trms">modern individual autonomy


="trms">modernization of ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (crucial component of the) regime of perceptual adaptability


diagram='lgc'> = optical ="trms">system ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ocular ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ ='strcls'>*rationalizable spatial account of vision='strcls'>*='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> vision as reflexive ='lgc'>: property of a subject figured as a ="trms">geometric point (='lgc'>=/= ambiguity and disorganization of ="trms">intersubjective ="trms">relations)
diagram ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> coherence
(vison, it is not a coin with double sides, it is rather a labyrinth ='lgc'>--="ppl">Lacan='lgc'>='lgc'>--> desiring subject ='lgc'>=/= point-to-point optical ="trms">system)


='strcls'>*palpable immediacy of a ="trms">modernized ="trms">presence='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to grasp and inhabit it, then dissolution into self-absorption)
(='qstn'>?="frds scrmbld">Sven plays with that) ='strcls'>*nebulous obscurity of ="trms">presence='strcls'>*

uncertain content of the ="trms">interior

(in Manet='lgc'>:) attentive='lgc'>: fluctuating ="trms">membrane, delicate pattern of ="trms">folding and un="trms">folding on to the ="trms">world
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> rhythm of opening and closing (this “="trms">social dispersion of ="trms">modernity” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> impassive autosufficiency of the individual observer='lgc'>] has become part of European subjectivity, it is good='lgc'>[='qstn'>?!='lgc'>], and i miss it in middle east post="trms">modernism)


Manet tentative splitting of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•figural re="trms">presentational facts
="lsts lst1">•facts of autonomous pictorial substance
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> now a European tradition)
(a movement towards “formlessness” very ="trms">different than eastern chaotic ="trms">imagination)

="large lg18" stl="font-size:121%"> Manet's confident inattention to the object and its coherence


fastening together and grounding ="trms">narrative content


='lgc'>[Manet (and many other 1880 pa="trms">inters) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>] problem of ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]realism='lgc'>: a ="trms">question of tenuous ="trms">relation between perceptual synthesis and dis="trms">sociation
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">question of ="trms">mimesis

achieving a ='strcls'>*reality-effect='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= to hold something together, to “contain” things, ='strcls'>***to ward of experiences of dis="trms">integration='strcls'>***
(the reality-effect is processed and achieved ="trms">differently in ="nms">Iran. how='qstn'>? how ="nms">iranian artists differ from the perceptual logic of ="trms">modernity='qstn'>?)

(='lgc'>[Elmira and ="frds scrmbld">Foad's='lgc'>] engagement with the) ambiguities of visual attentiveness

perceptual logic of ="trms">modernity (='lgc'>: two powerful tendencies at work)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*binding together of vision='strcls'>* ='lgc'>{an obsessive holding together of perception to maintain the viability of a functional real ="trms">world='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sealed
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*dynamic of (psychic/economic) exchange='strcls'>* ='lgc'>{dynamic of flux/dispersal='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> barely contained


(Manet's) faciality (a site of pictorial effect)='lgc'>: casual a="trms">morphousness, a surface that no longer discloses ="trms">interiority or self-reflection
(within 19th ='lgc'>+ 20th century ="trms">modernity) face='lgc'>: (par excellence) the substance of expression of the signifier ='lgc'>--(D='lgc'>+G)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**capita="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list faciality='strcls'>** (exists to serve a signifying ="trms">formula)='lgc'>: the means by which the signifier takes control, the ways it organizes a certain mode of individuated subjectification and collective madness of a ='strcls'>*machine without any content='strcls'>* (="ppl">="ppl">Crary > ="ppl">Guattari)

="prgrph">-who returns to the more tightly bound order of faciality='qstn'>? when and why='qstn'>?
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">articulated hierarchy of ="trms">socialized body
...relative ="trms">integrity of the face ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a larger mode of conformity to a dominant reality
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Geert
(="ppl">Deleuze and ="ppl">Guattari='lgc'>:) when head ceases to be ="trms">coded by the body ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ‘face’ () ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘body (='lgc'>+ head)’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ multidimensional polyvocal corporeal ="trms">code='lgc'>] over="trms">coded by what we call the Face
(////we have to escape the face and facialization!)

indication of bodies in my peers projects in ="nms">apass='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-kinds of subduing and constrain necessary for the construction of an ='strcls'>*organized and inhibited corporeality='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Laura's project)
="prgrph">-="trms">instruments of domestication

fixed pictorial (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a holding action) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">social organization



study object of ="trms">="trms">empirical ="trms">sciences around 1880='lgc'>: perceptual field newly de="trms">composed into various abstract units of sensation ='lgc'>+ related possibilities of synthesis
='lgc'>+ newly invented nervous disorders (hysteria, etc.)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (busy with) fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lures of the ="trms">integrity of perception ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> disas="trms">sociated fragments ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (impairment a="trms">symbolias='lgc'>:)
='strcls'>*agnosia='strcls'>*='lgc'>: inability to make any conceptual or ="trms">symbolic identification of an object ='lgc'>~ visual information experienced with a primal strangeness='lgc'>:
“perceptual field ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">pragmatic plasticity”
flat perception, no determination of depth object
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> labelled as pathological ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= my amazon project='lgc'>--was a form agnosia='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•resistance to ="trms">consuming the ="trms">world in a productive or ="trms">social way
="lsts lst1">•rejection of habitual or conventional patterns of organized perceptual information='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-this is part of the ="trms">phenomenology of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='strcls'>***
de="trms">symbolization of perception ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Foad

='lgc'>{for Janet:='lgc'>} attention='lgc'>: power of mental synthesis (='lgc'>~ the power of subject to form new perception, to have ="trms">memories)
='lgc'>{for ="ppl">Freud:='lgc'>} attention='lgc'>: dynamic activity of repression

="large lg38" stl="font-size:125%">
“='lgc'>[a='lgc'>] ="trms">society recognizes itself and its own ="trms">positivity through the morbid and pathological forms it identifies and invents” (="ppl">="ppl">Crary ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault)

subjectivity='lgc'>: provisional assembly of mobile and mutable components ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> attentiveness='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•conscious/voluntary ='lgc'>{task-oriented, higher behaviour='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•automatic/passive ='lgc'>{areas of habitual activity, daydreaming, reverie, ="trms">somnambulant states='lgc'>}


(the state of) the seated woman


='lgc'>[19th century regime of facility='lgc'>]
Clark's “face of ="trms">fashion” (= Manet's blanks), ="trms">fashion would keep one's face from any identity (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ‘the look’='lgc'>: public, outward, blase, impassive, not bored, not tired, not disdainful, not quite focused on anything)
impersonality ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->(="ppl">Benjamin's ="trms">modernity='lgc'>:) public space in which, for the first time, individuals are ="trms">systematically habituated not to return the gaze of the other ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> “chi dadash!='qstn'>?” or “was guckst du='qstn'>?!"='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-for three centuries, the meaning of human face was explained in terms of ="trms">rhetoric of ="trms">language. in 19th century suddenly face occupies a precarious ="trms">position='lgc'>: it is belonging to a human being as a='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•physiological organism
="lsts lst1">•privatized, ="trms">socialized individual subject
='lgc'>--="ppl">Darwin='lgc'>='lgc'>--> split status of face='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">symptom of an organism's anatomical and physiological functioning
="lsts lst1">•the mark of the success or fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure of a process of self-mastery and control (in the ="trms">social construction of a normative individual)

='strcls'>*face='lgc'>: (sign of a disquieting) continuum between the somatic and the ="trms">social='strcls'>*


boarded on a trance

(Bachelard='lgc'>:) reverie='lgc'>: irreality function ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> keep the psyche on the fringe of all the brutality of a hostile and foreign nonself (!)
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> reality function ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> adapt to reality='lgc'>: to manufacture works which are realities

="trms">modern flirtation='lgc'>: refusal and the withdrawal of the self are fused with the ="trms">phenomenon of drawing attention to the self (in one indivisible act)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Simmel

="trms">Poetics of Reverie (by Bachelard) ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eszter


how ="frds">Sina works
(in my more recent works i play with) ='lgc'>[no='lgc'>] enactment of visual mastery
='lgc'>[no='lgc'>] ocular potency
="prgrph">-my ="trms">storytelling operates in a state of distraction, in which the stability of the ="trms">story begin to erode ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> breakdown of normative attentive ="trms">narratives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the audience finds themselves in a trancelike state ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> condition for mobile and transient synthesis
="prgrph">-i mobilize a set of as="trms">sociative chains that are part of a libidinal economy (that i am part of) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*exceeding the binding logic of the work='strcls'>*


effectively
cross-eyed figure
sees
if anything at all
(it is a disunified field)
with two
disparate optical axes.
into the eclipse mental
the environment grows dim


attentive subject ='lgc'>--="ppl">Ricoeur='lgc'>='lgc'>--> part of the open state of the universe of signs ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> juncture of the ="trms">erotic ='and'>& the semantic

="trms">symbols, in their overloaded ="trms">semiotic banality, is where the ruse of desire is expressed

(a diagram='lgc'>:) parallel lines ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a principle of nonconvergence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the binocularity of vision is not united or synthesized on a ="trms">specific plane or point ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a spliting apart ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*unreconciled binocular disparity='strcls'>* (='lgc'>--="trms">situates='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">difference and nonidentity within the midst of perception)
='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= convergence (without which a normative attention would be impossible ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">world of focused clarity)='lgc'>]

="large lg10" stl="font-size:106%">
...as if a single object is seen by two nonreconciled eyes


seamless modulation of normative attention into a dispersed distraction ='lgc'>==='qstn'>?!='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (reassemblage and rebinding into the) ='strcls'>*repetitive laws of the unconscious='strcls'>*

...the image of conjugality and adultery ="trms">simultaneously
="prgrph">-fixed ="trms">position of limits

Bindung ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">figuration of an adulterous liaison

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]adultery (in the context of ="trms">modernization)='lgc'>: “a cynicism of forms,” merely another effect of a dominant ="trms">system of exchange (circulation and equivalence)
Tanner

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]infidelity='lgc'>: capacity to de="trms">compose oneself into the p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of distinctly ="trms">different essential tendencies, to detach the periphery from the center, and to make ="trms">interests and activities independent of their ="trms">integral ="trms">interconnection ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? ='mywrk'>my work='lgc'>]
="ppl">Simmel

in Duchampian terminology='lgc'>: (Manet's painting In The Conservatory) blossoming bride and bachelor enmeshed in a verdant anticonjugal machine of perpetual nonfulfilment

cultural corrosion of conjugality ='lgc'><='lgc'>== (one of) larger dis="trms">integration of pre="trms">modern ="trms">positions (of male and female)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•violent insertion of women into the process of commodity production

='strcls'>*labor and ="trms">society assume a mass character ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “women='lgc'> = mass articles” ='and'>& lose='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•their “="trms">natural” qualities (female essence defined by the production of life)
="lsts lst1">•their ="trms">poetic aura

traditional ="trms">positions disrupted by the logic of exchangeability='strcls'>***


greenhouses in 19th century, extended the dwelling and bore witness to the expansion of the private sphere. greenhouse provided a place to stroll in all weathers
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> frozen temporality ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> ="trms">memory and ="trms">history ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluded =(congealed ="trms">present)='lgc'>='lgc'>==> de="trms">historisized subjectivity

(fundamental) withdrawal of the possibility of ='strcls'>*="trms">gesture='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--="ppl">Agamben='lgc'>='lgc'>--> part of the particularly ="trms">modern fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure of ethos, of character
='lgc'>[="trms">gesture ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? ethos='lgc'>]

incapa="trms">citation='lgc'>: r="trms">enunciation of ='strcls'>*potentia='strcls'>*='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= capacity for being ="trms">affected, any expansion of practical being ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- Spinoza='lgc'>]


="large lg1" stl="font-size:141%"> smell of flowers='lgc'> = dis="trms">integrated product of their sexual ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metabolism ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="ppl">Freud


D='lgc'>+G becoming woman
='strcls'>*man='lgc'>: molar entity par excellence (='lgc'>=/= becomings are molecular), man constitutes the majority, the standard in which the majority is based='lgc'>: white, male, adult, rational ='lgc'>~ the average european, the subject of ="trms">enunciation
='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> problematized by ="ppl">Grosz ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="nms">ajayeb.net/='qstn'>?q=="ppl">Grosz='prcnt'>%2B="ppl">Deleuze='prcnt'>%2B="ppl">Guattari)


the perpetual self-invention of “free subjectivity” ='lgc'>--defining='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">modernity
cycle of de="trms">coding ='and'>& re="trms">coding ='lgc'>:
daring innovation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> hyper="trms">anxious self-consolidation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> renewed innovation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ...


Manet ='lgc'>=/= Caravaggio='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•intense optical contact
="lsts lst1">•tactile contact
="lsts lst1">•a reciprocal ="trms">system of investment in the transactional ="trms">nature of the encounter='lgc'>--infused with the ="trms">interplay of the ="trms">social, libidinal, and economic ="trms">difference

hands as='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•expression of individual consciousness (in Caravaggio)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">instrument of active ="trms">gesture (in Manet)


activity ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? simulation of ="trms">gesture

pointing index finger
confirmation of the impossibility of a direct perception, impossibility of an attention that was an immediate possession of its object (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Sa'di pointing out to the moon and his ="trms">lover...)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> every point of fixation is deferral
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (once='qstn'>?) functioned to denote a plane of transcendence


="trms">figuration of utopia ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">simultaneous mapping out of death, absence, and ="trms">finitude of ="trms">historical subjectivity


="ppl">Peirce's (nonoptical operation of attentive consciousness ='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Descartes) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> impossibility of direct intuition, of ="trms">interpretive process
='strcls'>**cognition and perception could only occur indirectly='strcls'>**
index='lgc'>: exercising a real physiological force over the attention ='lgc'>-- mesmerized into its particular object of sense.
= ='strcls'>*everything that focuses the attention='strcls'>*, (everything that startles us into an index)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> make something conceptually ="trms">present which is perceptually absent


="large lg34" stl="font-size:120%"> installed economy of attraction(/distraction) ='lgc'>[in European cities, and its deviation in ="nms">Tehran ="trms">differences='lgc'>]


="trms">fashion works to bind attention ="trms">onto its own pseudo-unity

against the living, ="trms">fashion asserts the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights of corpse and the sex appeal of the inorganic
(="ppl">Benjamin)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> death drive

(supreme cult of the commodity='lgc'>:) ="trms">fashion='lgc'>: a blossoming forth into a luminous apparition of the new
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>==>='qstn'>? withdrawal from ="trms">fashion='lgc'> = a strategy of freedom='lgc'>]

="ppl">Adorno='lgc'>: in the age of growing powerlessness of subjective spirit vis a vis ="trms">social objectivity, ="trms">fashion registers the alien ="trms">excess of objectivity in subjective spirit, which is painful yet all the same a corrective of the illusion that subjective spirit exist purely within itself. against its detractors, ="trms">fashion's most powerful ="trms">response is that it participates in the individual's impulse, which is saturated with ="trms">history. (“="trms">Aesthetic Theory” p316)


(='qstn'>?what are my time's) rhythms of attentiveness

="large lg6" stl="font-size:117%">
='strcls'>*mask='lgc'>: a means of mental survival

mask (of masculinity) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ability to keep a secret ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*all secrets are (at the end) sexual='strcls'>*


='lgc'>[='lgc'>]should our artistic practices comment or be continuous with the (emerging) ="trms">world of ="trms">consumer culture='qstn'>? ='at'>#make a ="trms">fashion magazine with ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali and ="frds scrmbld">Janina='lgc'>: excursion into the stultifying and emancipatory effects of the ="trms">fashion commodity. discussion on='lgc'>: jewellery, decoration, women's bodies, show, ="trms">travel, glitter, ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> kaleidoscopic decom="trms">position and displacement of the glitter object
="prgrph">-="ppl">Mallarme's La Derniere Mode
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> luminosity of a single object is lost amidst its inde="trms">finite reflections on the multiplied and fractured surfaces adjacent to it
='strcls'>*insubstantial ="trms">world (of mode) aligned with (its own) ="trms">sublime disavowal of the immediate='strcls'>* (, an emptiness and ="trms">anxiety at the heart of this impossible ="trms">presence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “to be out of style='lgc'> = death”)
="lsts lst1">•its titular concept
="lsts lst1">•="trms">internal movement of its text


artisanal ="trms">craft


(repetitive forms of='lgc'>:)
primal intuition of absence
transcendental signifier of ="trms">religion
sacramental authenticity of antiquity


(for Nietsche='lgc'>:) decadence='lgc'>: perpetual adaptability of ="trms">spectacular culture ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= (one loses one's power of) resistance against stimuli ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali ='lgc'>]
='lgc'>=/= existing capacities for action and living
(obsolescence, not the business of the ="trms">poet. ="ppl">Mallarme)
(the ="trms">question of resistance is weak. we must ask what are the emergent forms of life caused by that='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> might be ="trms">interesting for ="frds scrmbld">Hoda)

(="nms">apass's own hoped-for ritual civic theater of the future)='strcls'>*

attention sustained and enhanced by the regular introduction of novelty ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] means of simulating experiences of singularity and identity in the face of the processes of exchangeablity and equivalence
="prgrph">-="ppl">Guy ="ppl">Debord


for the hysteric='lgc'>: objects are too ="trms">present ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">excess of ="trms">presence make re="trms">presentation impossible
(for ="ppl">Deleuze ="trms">history of painting has been about warding off hysteria='strcls'>*)


organization of perceptual binding and synthesis (taking place while Monet was working)


determined by
="trms">different libidinal setup
other ="trms">category of perceptual dispersion
potential site of fixation

="large lg14" stl="font-size:133%">
="ppl">Freud (='lgc'>+ Klinger) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inseparability of attention from dream process ='and'>& ="trms">aesthetic production

(="ppl">Freud is testing) psychical energy='lgc'> = mobile attention

='strcls'>***observer='lgc'> = a kinetic seeing body set in movement='strcls'>*** (to glide along undeterminated ="trms">social and durational ="trms">trajectories)

place='lgc'>: that ordinary ="trms">anxiety, the expectancy, the ="trms">sublimated precariousness of a ="trms">modernizing ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban ="trms">world in which the individual is adrift on a smoothed-out surface devoid of any markers

='strcls'>*o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of ="trms">aesthetic sentiments='strcls'>*
of skating ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> movement of the body pleasurable to self and as="trms">sociated with the consciousness of gracefulnes, as in skating='lgc'>: movement of a kind that bring many muscles into harmonious action and strain none
(Spencer, Principles of Psychology)


='strcls'>*the facts of the case
Sachverhalten
the detective, collector, ="trms">consumer, and the fetishist (are same figures)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> idea fixe
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pathological disorders of attentiveness
='lgc'>[="trms">according to ="ppl">Freud='lgc'>] when attention isolates a particular content from a larger cognitive field, the act of dis="trms">sociation can be the initiation of a productive process
='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to Sherlock Holmes='lgc'>]


Weltpanorama
a 19th century attraction='lgc'>: sweeping ='strcls'>*comprehensive view='strcls'>*

stereoscopic peep show

a ="trms">consumer would pay to observe a mechanized series of photographic images

Fuhrmann ='lgc'>+ Daguerre='lgc'>: illusory three-dimensional s="trms">cenes whose reality-effects were augmented by concealed lighting and translucent painting

Kaiserpanorama ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- (a site ='lgc'>[in which the ='strcls'>*automation of perception='strcls'>* occurs='lgc'>] among many of) industrialization of visual ="trms">consumption
='lgc'>~ a space in which the physical and temporal alignment of body and machine cor="trms">respond to the rhythms of factory production (='lgc'>: the way novelty and ="trms">interruptions were introduced into assembly-line labor in order to prevent attention from veering into trance and daydream. -="ppl">="ppl">Crary) this is common to='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•precinematic devices in 1880s
="lsts lst1">•cinematic devices in 1890s
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (fragmentation of perception inherent to the ="trms">apparatus ="trms">presented in terms of) ='strcls'>**a mechanically produced continuum that “="trms">naturalizes” the disjunctions='strcls'>**
(="ppl">="ppl">Crary asks='lgc'>:) by what logic of temporal sequence or spatial continuity does one move from the ="trms">interior of papal apartments in Rome to the Great Wall of China to the Italian Alps in 120-seconds ="trms">intervals='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> visual equivalence of political imperialism='qstn'>? slogans such as “Reisen durch die ganze Welt.” German colonialism of the 1880s ='lgc'>--Sternberger='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “the views from European windows had lost their depth, becoming part and parcel of the same panorama ="trms">world surrounding them and constituting a painted surface every where.” ='at'>#="ppl">Olearius; tourism ='lgc'>+ forms of visual ="trms">consumption='lgc'>]

Muybridge's 1879 work on sequential photography ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> atomized field ='lgc'>+ not “truthful” syntax ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> segmentation='lgc'>--opening='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">onto an abstract order of continuities and un="trms">interrupted circuits

...we are in a ="trms">specific ="trms">historical phase in the reduction of the time and cost of movement ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>==> circulating capital
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">Marx='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “capital by its ="trms">nature drives beyond every spatial barrier” ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•creation of the physical condition of exchange
="lsts lst1">•creation of the means of ="trms">communication and transport
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*eradication of space by time='strcls'>*

instantaneity of vision from which space is deleted

vision compatible with the smooth space of the global ="trms">marketplace

uprooting of perception from any stable space-time coordination

the ="trms">history of capitalism is the ="trms">history of (effective operation of) overcoming obstacles of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•anything with a permanent stable location (incapable of being inserted into circulation)
="lsts lst1">•anything that is part of a ="trms">code (traditional or established pattern of behaviour, resisting deployment in ="trms">networks of abstract ="trms">relations)

="large lg38" stl="font-size:118%">
(images productive of labor usually end up ="trms">intermingling the re="trms">presentation of that land as a ='strcls'>*tranquil earthly paradise='strcls'>*)


an image='lgc'>: self-evident ="trms">presence of native workers on the coffee plantation; they remain invisible except as abstract components within flow of capital or as “="trms">naturalized” elements within an ="trms">imaginary landscape

an image='lgc'>: workers gathering and packing beans under midday clouds; a fraudulently homogenous and static image of elements (bodies and land) which have become quantified and exchangeable, part of an unstable ="trms">system ='strcls'>*incapable of immobilization='strcls'>*. it discloses the antinomic coexistence of living labor power (with its irreducible existential temporalities) and the tendency of capital to “circulation without circulation time.” the violence and ="trms">social devastation underlying this all over distribution of human being within the lush vegetation of an apparently pre="trms">modern landscape...


(my period of abstract digital image glitch='lgc'>: play of machinic objectivity ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) Muybridge's 1870s photograph of The Horse Motion ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “='strcls'>*to be outside of='strcls'>* a syntactical and semantic organization that supported ="trms">historical ="trms">narrative”
="prgrph">-the machinic objectivity in play does not stake out a subjective ="trms">position from which a “this happened” or a sense of “having been there” could be authenticated’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= my later ="trms">lecture-performances='lgc'>]. they are instances of ='strcls'>*combinatorial logic='strcls'>* in which the individual images, although ostensibly part of a linear sequence and syntax ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the way Julia noted ‘adjacency’ in the way i was ="trms">presenting my image series='lgc'>], have a (‘newly’ in 19th century) ='strcls'>***autonomous, floating identity.='strcls'>*** their immobilization and groundlessness and mutable temporality is also the condition of their detachment from any binding continuities or ="trms">trajectories, in a ='strcls'>*de="trms">coding of perceptual experience='strcls'>*='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> also relevant for ="frds scrmbld">Foad's a="trms">historical “intuition"='lgc'>]. ='lgc'>{this is could be related to a deeper ="trms">relation with my youth's reality and its perceptions ='lgc'>=/= attachment to binding continuities and ="trms">trajectories are central to my recent work='strcls'>****='lgc'>}
='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•rationalization and quantification of movement and time (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> mechanization of the body)
="lsts lst1">•posing p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lural scattering of attention (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds">Sina)
="lsts lst1">•possibility of unforeseen perceptual synthesis (outside of any disciplinary imperatives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Foad)


Kaiserpanorama ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> industrialized sequence of disconnected images
Muybridge's work ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> repetitive but disjunct series

(="ppl">="ppl">Crary shows='lgc'>:) demise of the punctual or anchored classical observer begins in the early 19th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a new unstable attentive subject (with a ='strcls'>*vision refigured as dynamic, temporal, com="trms">posite='strcls'>*) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">consumer/="trms">agent of/in synthesis of a proliferating diversity of reality-effects (='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> digital and cybernetic imperatives of our ="trms">present time)


="large lg18" stl="font-size:116%"> invention
dissolution
creative synthesis

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

antimony='lgc'>: contra="trms">diction between two equally reasonable statements

the antinomic character (of my conceptual schema='lgc'>: ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigidity and banality, attention and dis="trms">integration,,, ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*an object outside its logical control='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-charged with antagonistic forces, like Seurat, my ="trms">lectures (since now 2018) negate a possibility of an attentive closure, even as it fervently attempts to generate its own ="trms">internal ="trms">formula for perceptual ="trms">presence and unity. like Seurat's Parade de Cirque, it operates in a ceaseless play of disclosure and concealment. ='lgc'>[is it time to change='qstn'>?='lgc'>])

Seurat preoccupation with non="trms">specific temporalities

(estrangement from) a dream of instinctual wholeness

harmonious sensory utopia

="prgrph">-my ="trms">lecture-performances constitute a provisional realm of freedom for an individual observer ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ myself='lgc'>: a psychic, ="trms">social, ="trms">imaginary ="trms">position called being an ="nms">Iranian='lgc'>--='lgc'>] of a prismatic ="trms">past, coinciding with a proliferation of discourse ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= shifting p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of ‘centers'='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dream of subjective freedom ='lgc'>+ effects of power

perhaps ='mywrk'>my work is inseparable from (the consequences of the emergence of) ='strcls'>*models of subjective vision='strcls'>*

="prgrph">-use of optical mixture in ='mywrk'>my work.
how important is the retina (for any artist)='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->(the ="trms">question of) the seeing body in all of its physiological ="trms">density ='lgc'>+ ambiguous ="trms">position of that body within conceptions of visuality
="lsts lst1">•chromatic or luminous effects on the body

physiological regime of visuality (beginning with Thomas Young and ="ppl">Goethe, developed by Johannes Müller, Helmholtz and others) ='lgc'>=/= renaissance-based pictorial order


collapse of ='strcls'>*camera obscura='strcls'>* model of vision ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> emergence of ='strcls'>*psychological optics='strcls'>*


1890s
construction of various nonreferential models of perception
='lgc'>+
="trms">pragmatic functions of an observing subject

='lgc'>='lgc'>--> status of vision and mind
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature and value of sensation
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">presentation of ="trms">social facts


central to many developments in the visual culture in the West in late 19th century='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*="trms">questions of perceptual and cognitive synthesis='strcls'>*


="trms">Gestalt theory ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> essential primacy and ethical value of the ‘whole’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> an observer who perceives organized structures, who is marked by innate form-giving and form-apprehending capacities ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an effort to endow human perception with an inherent meaningfulness, coherence, and even orderliness (amid its perceptual decom="trms">position within 20th century ="trms">spectacular culture) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>[preparing for the perceptual logic of high capitalism:='lgc'>] it was not the attentive subject who identified form from a larger background, but rather the reverse, that “good” form had the capacity to produce attentiveness in a subject
(="trms">Gestalt theory was a dream of='lgc'>:)
the reciprocal affirmation of the unity of the individual subject ='and'>& the unified object of perception
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bisect visual filed into='lgc'>: significant “figure” and insignificant “background"='lgc'>]


impression ادراک/برداشت ='lgc'>=/= inference استنباط/استنتاج
(="ppl">Peirce='lgc'>:) color is not an impression, but an inference


(the last kind of) “="trms">natural” sign available to a visual artist


Seurat (like many others around that time) was testing the limits and possibilities of an observer attentive to a heterogeneity and ="trms">simultaneity of sensory ="trms">data
='lgc'>[="trms">specifically:='lgc'>] how an irreducible p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of luminous information could be organized and perceived coherently ... rearranged and made exchangeable


='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Laura='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*designated bodies='strcls'>* (are never permanent='lgc'>[!!='qstn'>?='lgc'>])
="prgrph">-is she actually busy with destiny and destined bodies='qstn'>? (for ="frds scrmbld">Laura='lgc'>:) design='lgc'> = destiny
="prgrph">-is she going to redesignate='qstn'>? how can she not='qstn'>? if she believes that the designated bodies are al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready on a fixed destiny or destination
='lgc'>[designate='lgc'>: appointed or made clear which place or direction spatially or ="trms">figuratively. related to ='strcls'>*design ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> destine='strcls'>*='lgc'>]


early 1890s
the time when western ="trms">science accepts the notion “that there might be several ways to re="trms">present the same fact” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> elephant parable ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">situated knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges='lgc'>]

1850s and 1860s
construction of models of the reflex functioning of the human nervous ="trms">system ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature of human ="trms">response to external stimulation


dynamogenesis (='lgc'>~ every state of consciousness tends to realize itself in an appropriate muscular movement)
vision reformed in 19th century='lgc'>: nonoptical modal of attentive subject, not the one who sees, rather, the subject is the one who is susceptible to psychomotor induction
(what was once figured as visual re="trms">presentation are now) the abstract and quantified reactions of the body as a com="trms">posite set of physical ="trms">systems
='lgc'>--Fere='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">instrumental relocation of vision (from a dis="trms">embodied and punctual ="trms">system of images) to an ="trms">interplay of forces and motor reactions (in which re="trms">presentation is irrelevant)
='lgc'>[this is inseparable from the larger project of ="trms">scientific amelioration of collective emotional hygiene of the 19th century='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*sensation='lgc'>: part of a sequence of events (in which the end point is not an inner state, such as='lgc'>: knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, cognition, perception, rather='lgc'>:) it is that which culminates in movement

some of the 1850s rationalizing ambitions (of widesp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read philosophical and ="trms">scientific conceptualization of a fundamental ="trms">relation between sensation and motor behaviour) indirectly informs Seurat's work ='lgc'>--proposing='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ sensory stimuli ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> motor expression (in the perceiver) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the ="trms">question of) ='strcls'>**human ="trms">response based on bypassing of conscious thought altogether='strcls'>**

(very important for ="nms">iranian artists='lgc'>: the ="trms">question of the ='strcls'>*rational mind of an observer='strcls'>* and intellectual construction directed to that ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> status of a conscious observer)
="prgrph">-producing effects involuntary in the observer
="prgrph">-(="frds scrmbld">Foad and ="frds">Sina engaging with an) ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively optical consciousness of the individual human subject ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> can we go beyond that='qstn'>? to which philosophical ="trms">sensual ethics of bodily awareness ="frds scrmbld">Foad and ="frds">Sina are optically bind to='qstn'>? which anti-optical ="trms">aesthetic ="trms">positions are available to us='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•="frds scrmbld">Foad's neoimpressionist='lgc'>: implication of total organic resonance ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>='lgc'>{ from organic activity of perception ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> transforming physical existence ='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•="frds">Sina's Einfuhlung='lgc'>: mode of intense perceptual absorption in which lines and forms are experienced as catalysts for vitalization of the ="trms">imagination


Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dream of a fully unalienated instinctual ="trms">aesthetic gratification ='lgc'>--through='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quantifiable and manageable economy of ex="trms">citation (within an organized and controllable body)

biological romanticism

="trms">anxiety of overstimulation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> power of sug="trms">gestion


attention ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Nietzsche's reality of drives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud's libidinal body (='lgc'>=/= physiological body) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*drives (='lgc'>=/= instincts) not tied to ="trms">specific conditions of satisfaction, are subsumed to an open-ended ‘plasticity’ (susceptible to substitution)
drive constantly misses its aim


(for Seurat, Fere, ="ppl">Nietzsche='lgc'>:)
art='lgc'> = physics (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">semiology) ='lgc'>: the ="trms">question of meaning in art was not about re="trms">presentation but a ="trms">relation of forces ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for Seurat color was not something accessible as a sign to a sovereign gaze but was an ="trms">interpretation made by the body

(both Seurat ='lgc'>[in his painting='lgc'>] and ="ppl">Nietzsche ='lgc'>[in will to power='lgc'>] have felt that there was) an extreme calm in certain ='strcls'>*sensations of rapture='strcls'>* ='lgc'>~ extra retardation of the feeling of time and space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the classical style is essentially a re="trms">presentation of this calm, simplification, abbreviation, concentration ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (='qstn'>?="frds">Sina's paintings) logical and ="trms">geometrical simplification ='lgc'><='lgc'>== enhancement of strength='strcls'>*!


a lot of artists are still busy with='lgc'>:
stimulus-="trms">response mechanisms
='strcls'>**="trms">techniques for the external management of ="trms">aesthetic ="trms">response='strcls'>** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quantifiable emotional engineering
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eszter directly
(the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of this discourse lies in 19th century automatic behaviour and nervous ="trms">response, ="trms">nature of mass subjectivity and desire for ="trms">social ="trms">integration, and since Seurat in visual art)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">spectator='lgc'>: a being that is acted apon
(does the artist want the ="trms">spectator “obey” a predetermined program of effects='qstn'>? specially in theater... even if we say this subject ='lgc'>[hypothetical individual observer='lgc'>] is a creative inventive affirmative body ='lgc'>--still='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pre="trms">supposing ='strcls'>**a subject that is a unity with a conscious will to be overcome='strcls'>** ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> ="trms">method)

putting a little onlooker at the bottom of my paintings ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? potential objects of ="trms">techniques for the control and management of perception and attention
(what are ="frds scrmbld">Foad's such objects='qstn'>?)

='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">question of ='strcls'>*how a sensory ="trms">world is dismantled, synthesized, and re="trms">presented (='lgc'>~ my paintings) is inseparable from the problem of how a ="trms">world of objects, individuals, and ="trms">social ="trms">relations (='lgc'>~ my performances) organizes itself='strcls'>*

what concerns Seurat (in ="trms">different terms of color image or human figures) is a ='strcls'>***tension between cohesion and dis="trms">integration='strcls'>*** (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that has been also my constant ="trms">aesthetic concern)
='lgc'>--this is evident in ='mywrk'>my work='lgc'>:
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*my paintings busy with='lgc'>] ="trms">questions of how diverse stimuli become tentatively “bound” into a coherent constellation
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*my performances busy with='lgc'>] ="trms">questions of how contents referring to a ="trms">social ="trms">world are fused or ="trms">integrated into a ="trms">network of ="trms">relations

(in ='mywrk'>my work) experimenting with='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•the unity of subjective experience (myself performing under influence, mad ="trms">lectures, ="trms">excessive synthesis, pathological and disruptive ="trms">storytelling)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">integrity of ="trms">social institution and processes (the loci and conditions of us coming together, space of art)
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">social tranquility ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> economic productivity
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">social fantasy of “solidarity” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> health and functional unity, individuals transformed into “="trms">social beings”

in a way most of us artists unconsciously in some way in an utopian projection of a sensory wholeness and fulfillment
(dream of) fabricators of powerful ="trms">imaginary ="trms">social ="trms">figurations

Durkheim and Seurat's ="trms">question of ="trms">social ='and'>& sensory='lgc'>: from what viewpoints significant manifestation of organization become apprehensible


my paintings
="lsts lst1">•(unstatistical) distribution of isolated and ="trms">categorized units ='lgc'><='lgc'>== additive principle of formal adjacency ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- (my belief='lgc'>:) depleted atomic ="trms">relations ='lgc'>[should='lgc'>] predominate beneath the spurious appearance of ="trms">social concord ='lgc'>[in my ="trms">world='lgc'>: ="nms">Iran='lgc'>]
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? ho="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic mode of as="trms">sociation (='lgc'>=/= my performances) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? desire for (="trms">modern forms of) cohesion (in the absence of inflexible forms ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ dis="trms">integration of the mechanical solidarity of tradition, ="trms">religion, myth, consanguinity='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? wanting an ='strcls'>*o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal solidarity='strcls'>* (='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to the image of the ‘harmonious vision of industrial ="trms">society’ in my early paintings, self-regulating landscapes of feedback loops ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*state of equilibrium='strcls'>* that i wanted to achieve in the painting not ="trms">symbolically)

="large lg46" stl="font-size:125%"> (i prefer ='strcls'>*pseudo solidarity='strcls'>*)

emergence of aggregates
manifestations of complexities

(this is happening in)
late 19th century is also the age of attempting to validate a relatively stable and domesticated image of the dynamism and destructiveness of capital

="trms">modernity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> state of harmonious equilibrium ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">interaction in ="trms">relation of agreement and ="trms">mutuality ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> new set of moral imperative ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*solidarity='strcls'>*='lgc'>: the duty to become a “="trms">social being” (='lgc'>~ to become ="trms">socialized in ="trms">relation to a wide range of institutions)


anomie='lgc'>: breakdown of an organized set of connections and adjacencies, deranges a normally regulated flow of ="trms">communication and feedback (='lgc'>=/= solidarity) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> thermodynamic framework

anomie (used to be) a celebrated passage is when the individual worker is no longer the living cell moved by continual contact with neighboring cells (='lgc'>=/= now in late liberal capitalism anomie is the mode of labor)

anomie (in thermodynamic framework) describes a statistical distribution of elements in which insufficient contact or adjacency prevents the flow of messages our information within the ="trms">system as a whole. ="trms">systemwide increase of local zones of dis="trms">sociation and dis="trms">integration ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- Durkheim



(Durkheim was ="trms">writing at the time of) crisis of ="trms">social cohesion within a ="trms">transitional period ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a ="trms">systematic ="trms">response was being shaped (foreshadowed in several of Seurat's major works) -='strcls'>*-='strcls'>*-='strcls'>*='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the making of a ="trms">society whose effective unity was founded on the ubiquity of ='strcls'>*="trms">spectacular ="trms">consumption through mass media and ="trms">technologies of illusion='strcls'>*
if ='strcls'>*="trms">religion='strcls'>* was the key “collective re="trms">presentation” (in Durkheim pre="trms">modern mechanical solidarity) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">spectacle='strcls'>* was to become the primary simulation of cohesion and unification within 20th century ="trms">modernity='strcls'>****
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Debord='lgc'>:) capitalism's solidarity='lgc'>: unity of subjects in their very separatedness


(="ppl">="ppl">Crary >) Seurat's entire visual output='lgc'>: ='lgc'>[="trms">systematic movement between:='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•large engineered re="trms">presentation of ="trms">social collectivities (='lgc'>~ crowds)
="lsts lst1">•images of isolation and separation

“='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]the unity of his optical aggregates was always an ephemeral subjective construction that never objectively modified the abstract and segmented status of his dots, so his assembling of provisional ="trms">social aggregates never alters the obdurately insular character of their individual human character.”

Seurat stakes out a darker and more skeptical ="trms">position than Durkheim about the possibility of ='strcls'>*="trms">positive knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of “="trms">social reality”='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> his works are determined by a sense of ='strcls'>**impalpability and evanescence of the ="trms">social itself='strcls'>**


(what is my “="trms">sociology” in ='mywrk'>my works='qstn'>?)


='lgc'>{ great ="trms">social catastrophes of the 19th century ='lgc'>+ accumulated bourgeois ="trms">anxiety over the disorders of revolution (1848 and 1871) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (emergence of French 1890s of) “="trms">science” of ="trms">sociology


let's stop mourning about the earlier model of political theater being displaced by by the ="trms">modernized forms of ="trms">spectacle (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> my critic on Kurzgesagt is outdated='qstn'>?)

="large lg26" stl="font-size:125%">
(for Seurat='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*art work='lgc'> = soli="trms">citation of attention='strcls'>*

play of attraction and absence (in ="frds">Sina and ="frds scrmbld">Foad's work)='lgc'>:
a visual or performative work designed around the cancellation and suspension of what it promises

Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="frds">Sina and) ="frds scrmbld">Foad's ob="trms">literation of the scenographic conditions of the work even as he simulates their persistence

Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='mywrk'>my work has always been scenic, ="trms">positioning its viewers before an apparently ="trms">stagelike space ='lgc'>[without orthogonal guides ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> assemblage of disjunct planner elements='lgc'>]
my (painting before and even more now) mimics a classical theatrical space, and (in play with that) at the same time it establishes an illusory ="trms">world extending away from the ="trms">spectator (collapsing that “="trms">stage,” dramatically sealing off possible avenues of entry into the work for our eyes) ='lgc'>==='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a ="trms">world related to the viewer's own point of view

deliberate archaism
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> medieval mystery plays)
closed-off antiscenic space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> forms of popular display (shadow figure, puppet theatre,) that only simulate or evoke the “cube” of theatrical space


to be careful with ='strcls'>*grid='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>--="trms">stories that the grid tells='lgc'>--='strcls'>*='lgc'>]
(="ppl">="ppl">Crary > Krauss='lgc'>:) by its very abstraction, grid conveys one of the basic laws of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*punctuality='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="nms">apass psychological optics and image of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge incorporated in ="trms">presentation of projects, ='at'>#workshop on topology='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the separation of the perceptual screen from that of the “real” ="trms">world
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]grid='lgc'>: (19th century) emblem of the infrastructure of vision ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> becoming an increasingly insistent and visible feature of neo-impressionist painting
(='lgc'>='lgc'>~/= ="ppl">="ppl">Crary is hesitant to characterize Seurat's flatness structurally as grid)
="prgrph">-tabular field with rows and columns making impossible a point to point (= punctual) ="trms">relation between ="trms">spectator and image

(="ppl">Martin Jay='lgc'>:) two scopic regimes='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•metric and homogenous tableau loosely synonymous with classical space
="lsts lst1">•decentered and destabilized perceptual regime with its mobile and ="trms">embodied observer

the evocation of a scenographic setup in Seurat (Parade de cirque) is a ="trms">veil over the desiccated, nonhomogenous, and additive construction of the work


frontality and unity of framing (of “primitive” cinema...)


='lgc'>[='qstn'>?do we need to='lgc'>] (in an illusionist mode) satisfy the principle of unitary organization of the scenic space


(how should you be concerned with ='lgc'>[public record='lgc'>] of your intellectual and ="trms">aesthetic formations='qstn'>?)



Seurat's Parade de cirque ='lgc'>=/= ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo's Last Supper
(Seurat broke free from ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo, and i should from Seurat)

both of these paintings are concerned with the revelation of a mystery='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo='lgc'>: the mystery of ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Christianson">Christian sacrifice as it coincides with a lucid apprehension of in="trms">finite extension
="lsts lst1">•Seurat='lgc'>: the “mystery” of the disenchanted and quantitative order of capita="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list exchange (and its overturning of homogeneity and legibility of space)

witness to='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-holy ="trms">communion -="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo
="prgrph">-rituals intrinsic to ="trms">modernity -Seurat

in terms of orthogonal illustrated in ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo is precisely what Seurat dismantles in Parade de Cirque

the ="trms">question of value
movement of abstract quantities
(transactional dimensions of Seurat's work)

lost transparency='lgc'>:
how the use of money within ="trms">modernity transformed the ="trms">social character of exchange ='strcls'>***from something ="trms">interpersonal to an anonymous transaction='strcls'>*** at the distance (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Reza's hold-up of values, the dream of ="trms">interpersonal transaction and resistance of anonymity and distance)
='lgc'>[the problem that all artists have with money ='lgc'>--="ppl">Simmel='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>] ='strcls'>*a ="trms">priori equivalence of price (for all commodities) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> eliminate='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•deliberations and examinations of the buyer
="lsts lst1">•effects and elucidations of the seller
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> quick and in="trms">different economic transaction

“selling tickets”='lgc'>: accumulated ="trms">social experience of separation='lgc'> = ='strcls'>*depersonalized exchange='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that which many artists are dealing with as a problem)
='lgc'>--Gouz='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]capitalism='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*dis="trms">affection of value='strcls'>* (the libidinal, the ="trms">intersubjective, the semantic are completely divorced from the economic ="trms">relation ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> economic sector ='lgc'>=/= semantic ="trms">affective investment)

Seurat's meditation on the emptiness of a ="trms">modern ="trms">relation of display and ="trms">consumption

cost of ad="trms">mission at two ="trms">different rates='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo='lgc'>: head of Jesus at the vanishing point of the window opening ="trms">onto in="trms">finite celestial space (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> regime of signs that possess intrinsic value ='lgc'>=/=)
="prgrph">-Seurat='lgc'>: price tag, grid space (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> regime of signs that are ="trms">symbols of value)


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]scenic='lgc'>: determined by the ="trms">position of an (depicted) observer


ubiquity of the subjective experience of “shopping” ='and'>& its construction as ="trms">spectacle

‘price tag’='lgc'>: (one of the vanishing points of ="trms">modernity,) the draining away of the illusion of reference or stability

="trms">Poe's str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger itinerary, a paradigmatic ="trms">articulation of ="trms">modern loneliness
“at no moment did he see that i watched him. he entered shop after shop, priced nothing, spoke no word, and look at the ob[...]