[...]ial (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a holding action) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">social organization
study object of ="trms">="trms">empirical ="trms">sciences around 1880='lgc'>: perceptual field newly de="trms">composed into various abstract units of sensation ='lgc'>+ related possibilities of synthesis
='lgc'>+ newly invented nervous disorders (hysteria, etc.)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (busy with) fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lures of the ="trms">integrity of perception ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> disas="trms">sociated fragments ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (impairment a="trms">symbolias='lgc'>:)
='strcls'>*agnosia='strcls'>*='lgc'>: inability to make any conceptual or ="trms">symbolic identification of an object ='lgc'>~ visual information experienced with a primal strangeness='lgc'>:
“perceptual field ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">pragmatic plasticity”
flat perception, no determination of depth object
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> labelled as pathological ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= my amazon project='lgc'>--was a form agnosia='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•resistance to ="trms">consuming the ="trms">world in a productive or ="trms">social way
="lsts lst1">•rejection of habitual or conventional patterns of organized perceptual information='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-this is part of the ="trms">phenomenology of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='strcls'>***
de="trms">symbolization of perception ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Foad
='lgc'>{for Janet:='lgc'>} attention='lgc'>: power of mental synthesis (='lgc'>~ the power of subject to form new perception, to have ="trms">memories)
='lgc'>{for ="ppl">Freud:='lgc'>} attention='lgc'>: dynamic activity of repression
="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%">
“='lgc'>[a='lgc'>] ="trms">society recognizes itself and its own ="trms">positivity through the morbid and pathological forms it identifies and invents” (="ppl">="ppl">Crary ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault)
subjectivity='lgc'>: provisional assembly of mobile and mutable components ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> attentiveness='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•conscious/voluntary ='lgc'>{task-oriented, higher behaviour='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•automatic/passive ='lgc'>{areas of habitual activity, daydreaming, reverie, ="trms">somnambulant states='lgc'>}
="large lg26" stl="font-size:117%">
(the state of) the seated woman
='lgc'>[19th century regime of facility='lgc'>]
Clark's “face of ="trms">fashion” (= Manet's blanks), ="trms">fashion would keep one's face from any identity (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ‘the look’='lgc'>: public, outward, blase, impassive, not bored, not tired, not disdainful, not quite focused on anything)
impersonality ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->(="ppl">Benjamin's ="trms">modernity='lgc'>:) public space in which, for the first time, individuals are ="trms">systematically habituated not to return the gaze of the other ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> “chi dadash!='qstn'>?” or “was guckst du='qstn'>?!"='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-for three centuries, the meaning of human face was explained in terms of ="trms">rhetoric of ="trms">language. in 19th century suddenly face occupies a precarious ="trms">position='lgc'>: it is belonging to a human being as a='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•physiological organism
="lsts lst1">•privatized, ="trms">socialized individual subject
='lgc'>--="ppl">Darwin='lgc'>='lgc'>--> split status of face='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">symptom of an organism's anatomical and physiological functioning
="lsts lst1">•the mark of the success or fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure of a process of self-mastery and control (in the ="trms">social construction of a normative individual)
='strcls'>*face='lgc'>: (sign of a disquieting) continuum between the somatic and the ="trms">social='strcls'>*
boarded on a trance
(Bachelard='lgc'>:) reverie='lgc'>: irreality function ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> keep the psyche on the fringe of all the brutality of a hostile and foreign nonself (!)
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> reality function ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> adapt to reality='lgc'>: to manufacture works which are realities
="large lg10" stl="font-size:121%">
="trms">modern flirtation='lgc'>: refusal and the withdrawal of the self are fused with the ="trms">phenomenon of drawing attention to the self (in one indivisible act)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Simmel
="trms">Poetics of Reverie (by Bachelard) ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eszter
how ="frds">Sina works
(in my more recent works i play with) ='lgc'>[no='lgc'>] enactment of visual mastery
='lgc'>[no='lgc'>] ocular potency
="prgrph">-my ="trms">storytelling operates in a state of distraction, in which the stability of the ="trms">story begin to erode ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> breakdown of normative attentive ="trms">narratives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the audience finds themselves in a trancelike state ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> condition for mobile and transient synthesis
="prgrph">-i mobilize a set of as="trms">sociative chains that are part of a libidinal economy (that i am part of) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*exceeding the binding logic of the work='strcls'>*
effectively
cross-eyed figure
sees
if anything at all
(it is a disunified field)
with two
disparate optical axes.
into the eclipse mental
the environment grows dim
attentive subject ='lgc'>--="ppl">Ricoeur='lgc'>='lgc'>--> part of the open state of the universe of signs ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> juncture of the ="trms">erotic ='and'>& the semantic
="trms">symbols, in their overloaded ="trms">semiotic banality, is where the ruse of desire is expressed
(a diagram='lgc'>:) parallel lines ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a principle of nonconvergence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the binocularity of vision is not united or synthesized on a ="trms">specific plane or point ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a spliting apart ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*unreconciled binocular disparity='strcls'>* (='lgc'>--="trms">situates='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">difference and nonidentity within the midst of perception)
='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= convergence (without which a normative attention would be impossible ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">world of focused clarity)='lgc'>]
...as if a single object is seen by two nonreconciled eyes
seamless modulation of normative attention into a dispersed distraction ='lgc'>==='qstn'>?!='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (reassemblage and rebinding into the) ='strcls'>*repetitive laws of the unconscious='strcls'>*
...the image of conjugality and adultery ="trms">simultaneously
="prgrph">-fixed ="trms">position of limits
Bindung ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">figuration of an adulterous liaison
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]adultery (in the context of ="trms">modernization)='lgc'>: “a cynicism of forms,” merely another effect of a dominant ="trms">system of exchange (circulation and equivalence)
Tanner
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]infidelity='lgc'>: capacity to de="trms">compose oneself into the p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of distinctly ="trms">different essential tendencies, to detach the periphery from the center, and to make ="trms">interests and activities independent of their ="trms">integral ="trms">interconnection ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? ='mywrk'>my work='lgc'>]
="ppl">Simmel
in Duchampian terminology='lgc'>: (Manet's painting In The Conservatory) blossoming bride and bachelor enmeshed in a verdant anticonjugal machine of perpetual nonfulfilment
cultural corrosion of conjugality ='lgc'><='lgc'>== (one of) larger dis="trms">integration of pre="trms">modern ="trms">positions (of male and female)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•violent insertion of women into the process of commodity production
='strcls'>*labor and ="trms">society assume a mass character ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “women='lgc'> = mass articles” ='and'>& lose='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•their “="trms">natural” qualities (female essence defined by the production of life)
="lsts lst1">•their ="trms">poetic aura
traditional ="trms">positions disrupted by the logic of exchangeability='strcls'>***
greenhouses in 19th century, extended the dwelling and bore witness to the expansion of the private sphere. greenhouse provided a place to stroll in all weathers
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> frozen temporality ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> ="trms">memory and ="trms">history ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluded =(congealed ="trms">present)='lgc'>='lgc'>==> de="trms">historisized subjectivity
(fundamental) withdrawal of the possibility of ='strcls'>*="trms">gesture='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--="ppl">Agamben='lgc'>='lgc'>--> part of the particularly ="trms">modern fai="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure of ethos, of character
='lgc'>[="trms">gesture ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? ethos='lgc'>]
incapa="trms">citation='lgc'>: r="trms">enunciation of ='strcls'>*potentia='strcls'>*='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= capacity for being ="trms">affected, any expansion of practical being ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- Spinoza='lgc'>]
smell of flowers='lgc'> = dis="trms">integrated product of their sexual ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metabolism ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="ppl">Freud
D='lgc'>+G becoming woman
='strcls'>*man='lgc'>: molar entity par excellence (='lgc'>=/= becomings are molecular), man constitutes the majority, the standard in which the majority is based='lgc'>: white, male, adult, rational ='lgc'>~ the average european, the subject of ="trms">enunciation
='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> problematized by ="ppl">Grosz ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="nms">ajayeb.net/='qstn'>?q=="ppl">Grosz='prcnt'>%2B="ppl">Deleuze='prcnt'>%2B="ppl">Guattari)
the perpetual self-invention of “free subjectivity” ='lgc'>--defining='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">modernity
cycle of de="trms">coding ='and'>& re="trms">coding ='lgc'>:
daring innovation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> hyper="trms">anxious self-consolidation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> renewed innovation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ...
Manet ='lgc'>=/= Caravaggio='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•intense optical contact
="lsts lst1">•tactile contact
="lsts lst1">•a reciprocal ="trms">system of investment in the transactional ="trms">nature of the encounter='lgc'>--infused with the ="trms">interplay of the ="trms">social, libidinal, and economic ="trms">difference
hands as='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•expression of individual consciousness (in Caravaggio)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">instrument of active ="trms">gesture (in Manet)
activity ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? simulation of ="trms">gesture
pointing index finger
confirmation of the impossibility of a direct perception, impossibility of an attention that was an immediate possession of its object (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Sa'di pointing out to the moon and his ="trms">lover...)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> every point of fixation is deferral
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (once='qstn'>?) functioned to denote a plane of transcendence
="large lg1" stl="font-size:126%">
="trms">figuration of utopia ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">simultaneous mapping out of death, absence, and ="trms">finitude of ="trms">historical subjectivity
="ppl">Peirce's (nonoptical operation of attentive consciousness ='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Descartes) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> impossibility of direct intuition, of ="trms">interpretive process
='strcls'>**cognition and perception could only occur indirectly='strcls'>**
index='lgc'>: exercising a real physiological force over the attention ='lgc'>-- mesmerized into its particular object of sense.
= ='strcls'>*everything that focuses the attention='strcls'>*, (everything that startles us into an index)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> make something conceptually ="trms">present which is perceptually absent
installed economy of attraction(/distraction) ='lgc'>[in European cities, and its deviation in ="nms">Tehran ="trms">differences='lgc'>]
="trms">fashion works to bind attention ="trms">onto its own pseudo-unity
against the living, ="trms">fashion asserts the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights of corpse and the sex appeal of the inorganic
(="ppl">Benjamin)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> death drive
(supreme cult of the commodity='lgc'>:) ="trms">fashion='lgc'>: a blossoming forth into a luminous apparition of the new
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>==>='qstn'>? withdrawal from ="trms">fashion='lgc'> = a strategy of freedom='lgc'>]
="ppl">Adorno='lgc'>: in the age of growing powerlessness of subjective spirit vis a vis ="trms">social objectivity, ="trms">fashion registers the alien ="trms">excess of objectivity in subjective spirit, which is painful yet all the same a corrective of the illusion that subjective spirit exist purely within itself. against its detractors, ="trms">fashion's most powerful ="trms">response is that it participates in the individual's impulse, which is saturated with ="trms">history. (“="trms">Aesthetic Theory” p316)
(='qstn'>?what are my time's) rhythms of attentiveness
='strcls'>*mask='lgc'>: a means of mental survival
mask (of masculinity) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ability to keep a secret ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*all secrets are (at the end) sexual='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='lgc'>]should our artistic practices comment or be continuous with the (emerging) ="trms">world of ="trms">consumer culture='qstn'>? ='at'>#make a ="trms">fashion magazine with ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali and ="frds scrmbld">Janina='lgc'>: excursion into the stultifying and emancipatory effects of the ="trms">fashion commodity. discussion on='lgc'>: jewellery, decoration, women's bodies, show, ="trms">travel, glitter, ='lgc'>-='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> kaleidoscopic decom="trms">position and displacement of the glitter object
="prgrph">-="ppl">Mallarme's La Derniere Mode
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> luminosity of a single object is lost amidst its inde="trms">finite reflections on the multiplied and fractured surfaces adjacent to it
='strcls'>*insubstantial ="trms">world (of mode) aligned with (its own) ="trms">sublime disavowal of the immediate='strcls'>* (, an emptiness and ="trms">anxiety at the heart of this impossible ="trms">presence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “to be out of style='lgc'> = death”)
="lsts lst1">•its titular concept
="lsts lst1">•="trms">internal movement of its text
artisanal ="trms">craft
(repetitive forms of='lgc'>:)
primal intuition of absence
transcendental signifier of ="trms">religion
sacramental authenticity of antiquity
(for Nietsche='lgc'>:) decadence='lgc'>: perpetual adaptability of ="trms">spectacular culture ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= (one loses one's power of) resistance against stimuli ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali ='lgc'>]
='lgc'>=/= existing capacities for action and living
(obsolescence, not the business of the ="trms">poet. ="ppl">Mallarme)
(the ="trms">question of resistance is weak. we must ask what are the emergent forms of life caused by that='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> might be ="trms">interesting for ="frds scrmbld">Hoda)
(="nms">apass's own hoped-for ritual civic theater of the future)='strcls'>*
attention sustained and enhanced by the regular introduction of novelty ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] means of simulating experiences of singularity and identity in the face of the processes of exchangeablity and equivalence
="prgrph">-="ppl">Guy ="ppl">Debord
for the hysteric='lgc'>: objects are too ="trms">present ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">excess of ="trms">presence make re="trms">presentation impossible
(for ="ppl">Deleuze ="trms">history of painting has been about warding off hysteria='strcls'>*)
organization of perceptual binding and synthesis (taking place while Monet was working)
determined by
="trms">different libidinal setup
other ="trms">category of perceptual dispersion
potential site of fixation
="ppl">Freud (='lgc'>+ Klinger) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inseparability of attention from dream process ='and'>& ="trms">aesthetic production
(="ppl">Freud is testing) psychical energy='lgc'> = mobile attention
='strcls'>***observer='lgc'> = a kinetic seeing body set in movement='strcls'>*** (to glide along undeterminated ="trms">social and durational ="trms">trajectories)
place='lgc'>: that ordinary ="trms">anxiety, the expectancy, the ="trms">sublimated precariousness of a ="trms">modernizing ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban ="trms">world in which the individual is adrift on a smoothed-out surface devoid of any markers
='strcls'>*o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of ="trms">aesthetic sentiments='strcls'>*
of skating ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> movement of the body pleasurable to self and as="trms">sociated with the consciousness of gracefulnes, as in skating='lgc'>: movement of a kind that bring many muscles into harmonious action and strain none
(Spencer, Principles of Psychology)
='strcls'>*the facts of the case
Sachverhalten
the detective, collector, ="trms">consumer, and the fetishist (are same figures)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> idea fixe
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pathological disorders of attentiveness
='lgc'>[="trms">according to ="ppl">Freud='lgc'>] when attention isolates a particular content from a larger cognitive field, the act of dis="trms">sociation can be the initiation of a productive process
='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to Sherlock Holmes='lgc'>]
Weltpanorama
a 19th century attraction='lgc'>: sweeping ='strcls'>*comprehensive view='strcls'>*
stereoscopic peep show
a ="trms">consumer would pay to observe a mechanized series of photographic images
Fuhrmann ='lgc'>+ Daguerre='lgc'>: illusory three-dimensional s="trms">cenes whose reality-effects were augmented by concealed lighting and translucent painting
Kaiserpanorama ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- (a site ='lgc'>[in which the ='strcls'>*automation of perception='strcls'>* occurs='lgc'>] among many of) industrialization of visual ="trms">consumption
='lgc'>~ a space in which the physical and temporal alignment of body and machine cor="trms">respond to the rhythms of factory production (='lgc'>: the way novelty and ="trms">interruptions were introduced into assembly-line labor in order to prevent attention from veering into trance and daydream. -="ppl">="ppl">Crary) this is common to='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•precinematic devices in 1880s
="lsts lst1">•cinematic devices in 1890s
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (fragmentation of perception inherent to the ="trms">apparatus ="trms">presented in terms of) ='strcls'>**a mechanically produced continuum that “="trms">naturalizes” the disjunctions='strcls'>**
(="ppl">="ppl">Crary asks='lgc'>:) by what logic of temporal sequence or spatial continuity does one move from the ="trms">interior of papal apartments in Rome to the Great Wall of China to the Italian Alps in 120-seconds ="trms">intervals='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> visual equivalence of political imperialism='qstn'>? slogans such as “Reisen durch die ganze Welt.” German colonialism of the 1880s ='lgc'>--Sternberger='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “the views from European windows had lost their depth, becoming part and parcel of the same panorama ="trms">world surrounding them and constituting a painted surface every where.” ='at'>#="ppl">Olearius; tourism ='lgc'>+ forms of visual ="trms">consumption='lgc'>]
Muybridge's 1879 work on sequential photography ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> atomized field ='lgc'>+ not “truthful” syntax ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> segmentation='lgc'>--opening='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">onto an abstract order of continuities and un="trms">interrupted circuits
...we are in a ="trms">specific ="trms">historical phase in the reduction of the time and cost of movement ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>==> circulating capital
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">Marx='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “capital by its ="trms">nature drives beyond every spatial barrier” ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•creation of the physical condition of exchange
="lsts lst1">•creation of the means of ="trms">communication and transport
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*eradication of space by time='strcls'>*
instantaneity of vision from which space is deleted
vision compatible with the smooth space of the global ="trms">marketplace
uprooting of perception from any stable space-time coordination
="large lg6" stl="font-size:125%">
the ="trms">history of capitalism is the ="trms">history of (effective operation of) overcoming obstacles of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•anything with a permanent stable location (incapable of being inserted into circulation)
="lsts lst1">•anything that is part of a ="trms">code (traditional or established pattern of behaviour, resisting deployment in ="trms">networks of abstract ="trms">relations)
(images productive of labor usually end up ="trms">intermingling the re="trms">presentation of that land as a ='strcls'>*tranquil earthly paradise='strcls'>*)
an image='lgc'>: self-evident ="trms">presence of native workers on the coffee plantation; they remain invisible except as abstract components within flow of capital or as “="trms">naturalized” elements within an ="trms">imaginary landscape
an image='lgc'>: workers gathering and packing beans under midday clouds; a fraudulently homogenous and static image of elements (bodies and land) which have become quantified and exchangeable, part of an unstable ="trms">system ='strcls'>*incapable of immobilization='strcls'>*. it discloses the antinomic coexistence of living labor power (with its irreducible existential temporalities) and the tendency of capital to “circulation without circulation time.” the violence and ="trms">social devastation underlying this all over distribution of human being within the lush vegetation of an apparently pre="trms">modern landscape...
(my period of abstract digital image glitch='lgc'>: play of machinic objectivity ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) Muybridge's 1870s photograph of The Horse Motion ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “='strcls'>*to be outside of='strcls'>* a syntactical and semantic organization that supported ="trms">historical ="trms">narrative”
="prgrph">-the machinic objectivity in play does not stake out a subjective ="trms">position from which a “this happened” or a sense of “having been there” could be authenticated’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= my later ="trms">lecture-performances='lgc'>]. they are instances of ='strcls'>*combinatorial logic='strcls'>* in which the individual images, although ostensibly part of a linear sequence and syntax ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the way Julia noted ‘adjacency’ in the way i was ="trms">presenting my image series='lgc'>], have a (‘newly’ in 19th century) ='strcls'>***autonomous, floating identity.='strcls'>*** their immobilization and groundlessness and mutable temporality is also the condition of their detachment from any binding continuities or ="trms">trajectories, in a ='strcls'>*de="trms">coding of perceptual experience='strcls'>*='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> also relevant for ="frds scrmbld">Foad's a="trms">historical “intuition"='lgc'>]. ='lgc'>{this is could be related to a deeper ="trms">relation with my youth's reality and its perceptions ='lgc'>=/= attachment to binding continuities and ="trms">trajectories are central to my recent work='strcls'>****='lgc'>}
='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•rationalization and quantification of movement and time (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> mechanization of the body)
="lsts lst1">•posing p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lural scattering of attention (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds">Sina)
="lsts lst1">•possibility of unforeseen perceptual synthesis (outside of any disciplinary imperatives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Foad)
Kaiserpanorama ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> industrialized sequence of disconnected images
Muybridge's work ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> repetitive but disjunct series
(="ppl">="ppl">Crary shows='lgc'>:) demise of the punctual or anchored classical observer begins in the early 19th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a new unstable attentive subject (with a ='strcls'>*vision refigured as dynamic, temporal, com="trms">posite='strcls'>*) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">consumer/="trms">agent of/in synthesis of a proliferating diversity of reality-effects (='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> digital and cybernetic imperatives of our ="trms">present time)
invention
dissolution
creative synthesis
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
antimony='lgc'>: contra="trms">diction between two equally reasonable statements
the antinomic character (of my conceptual schema='lgc'>: ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigidity and banality, attention and dis="trms">integration,,, ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*an object outside its logical control='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-charged with antagonistic forces, like Seurat, my ="trms">lectures (since now 2018) negate a possibility of an attentive closure, even as it fervently attempts to generate its own ="trms">internal ="trms">formula for perceptual ="trms">presence and unity. like Seurat's Parade de Cirque, it operates in a ceaseless play of disclosure and concealment. ='lgc'>[is it time to change='qstn'>?='lgc'>])
Seurat preoccupation with non="trms">specific temporalities
(estrangement from) a dream of instinctual wholeness
harmonious sensory utopia
="prgrph">-my ="trms">lecture-performances constitute a provisional realm of freedom for an individual observer ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ myself='lgc'>: a psychic, ="trms">social, ="trms">imaginary ="trms">position called being an ="nms">Iranian='lgc'>--='lgc'>] of a prismatic ="trms">past, coinciding with a proliferation of discourse ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= shifting p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of ‘centers'='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dream of subjective freedom ='lgc'>+ effects of power
perhaps ='mywrk'>my work is inseparable from (the consequences of the emergence of) ='strcls'>*models of subjective vision='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-use of optical mixture in ='mywrk'>my work.
how important is the retina (for any artist)='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->(the ="trms">question of) the seeing body in all of its physiological ="trms">density ='lgc'>+ ambiguous ="trms">position of that body within conceptions of visuality
="lsts lst1">•chromatic or luminous effects on the body
physiological regime of visuality (beginning with Thomas Young and ="ppl">Goethe, developed by Johannes Müller, Helmholtz and others) ='lgc'>=/= renaissance-based pictorial order
collapse of ='strcls'>*camera obscura='strcls'>* model of vision ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> emergence of ='strcls'>*psychological optics='strcls'>*
1890s
construction of various nonreferential models of perception
='lgc'>+
="trms">pragmatic functions of an observing subject
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> status of vision and mind
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature and value of sensation
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">presentation of ="trms">social facts
central to many developments in the visual culture in the West in late 19th century='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*="trms">questions of perceptual and cognitive synthesis='strcls'>*
="trms">Gestalt theory ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> essential primacy and ethical value of the ‘whole’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> an observer who perceives organized structures, who is marked by innate form-giving and form-apprehending capacities ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an effort to endow human perception with an inherent meaningfulness, coherence, and even orderliness (amid its perceptual decom="trms">position within 20th century ="trms">spectacular culture) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>[preparing for the perceptual logic of high capitalism:='lgc'>] it was not the attentive subject who identified form from a larger background, but rather the reverse, that “good” form had the capacity to produce attentiveness in a subject
(="trms">Gestalt theory was a dream of='lgc'>:)
the reciprocal affirmation of the unity of the individual subject ='and'>& the unified object of perception
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bisect visual filed into='lgc'>: significant “figure” and insignificant “background"='lgc'>]
="large lg18" stl="font-size:131%">
impression ادراک/برداشت ='lgc'>=/= inference استنباط/استنتاج
(="ppl">Peirce='lgc'>:) color is not an impression, but an inference
(the last kind of) “="trms">natural” sign available to a visual artist
Seurat (like many others around that time) was testing the limits and possibilities of an observer attentive to a heterogeneity and ="trms">simultaneity of sensory ="trms">data
='lgc'>[="trms">specifically:='lgc'>] how an irreducible p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of luminous information could be organized and perceived coherently ... rearranged and made exchangeable
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Laura='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*designated bodies='strcls'>* (are never permanent='lgc'>[!!='qstn'>?='lgc'>])
="prgrph">-is she actually busy with destiny and destined bodies='qstn'>? (for ="frds scrmbld">Laura='lgc'>:) design='lgc'> = destiny
="prgrph">-is she going to redesignate='qstn'>? how can she not='qstn'>? if she believes that the designated bodies are al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready on a fixed destiny or destination
='lgc'>[designate='lgc'>: appointed or made clear which place or direction spatially or ="trms">figuratively. related to ='strcls'>*design ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> destine='strcls'>*='lgc'>]
early 1890s
the time when western ="trms">science accepts the notion “that there might be several ways to re="trms">present the same fact” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> elephant parable ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">situated knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges='lgc'>]
1850s and 1860s
construction of models of the reflex functioning of the human nervous ="trms">system ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature of human ="trms">response to external stimulation
dynamogenesis (='lgc'>~ every state of consciousness tends to realize itself in an appropriate muscular movement)
vision reformed in 19th century='lgc'>: nonoptical modal of attentive subject, not the one who sees, rather, the subject is the one who is susceptible to psychomotor induction
(what was once figured as visual re="trms">presentation are now) the abstract and quantified reactions of the body as a com="trms">posite set of physical ="trms">systems
='lgc'>--Fere='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">instrumental relocation of vision (from a dis="trms">embodied and punctual ="trms">system of images) to an ="trms">interplay of forces and motor reactions (in which re="trms">presentation is irrelevant)
='lgc'>[this is inseparable from the larger project of ="trms">scientific amelioration of collective emotional hygiene of the 19th century='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*sensation='lgc'>: part of a sequence of events (in which the end point is not an inner state, such as='lgc'>: knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, cognition, perception, rather='lgc'>:) it is that which culminates in movement
some of the 1850s rationalizing ambitions (of widesp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read philosophical and ="trms">scientific conceptualization of a fundamental ="trms">relation between sensation and motor behaviour) indirectly informs Seurat's work ='lgc'>--proposing='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ sensory stimuli ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> motor expression (in the perceiver) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the ="trms">question of) ='strcls'>**human ="trms">response based on bypassing of conscious thought altogether='strcls'>**
(very important for ="nms">iranian artists='lgc'>: the ="trms">question of the ='strcls'>*rational mind of an observer='strcls'>* and intellectual construction directed to that ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> status of a conscious observer)
="prgrph">-producing effects involuntary in the observer
="prgrph">-(="frds scrmbld">Foad and ="frds">Sina engaging with an) ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively optical consciousness of the individual human subject ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> can we go beyond that='qstn'>? to which philosophical ="trms">sensual ethics of bodily awareness ="frds scrmbld">Foad and ="frds">Sina are optically bind to='qstn'>? which anti-optical ="trms">aesthetic ="trms">positions are available to us='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•="frds scrmbld">Foad's neoimpressionist='lgc'>: implication of total organic resonance ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>='lgc'>{ from organic activity of perception ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> transforming physical existence ='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•="frds">Sina's Einfuhlung='lgc'>: mode of intense perceptual absorption in which lines and forms are experienced as catalysts for vitalization of the ="trms">imagination
Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dream of a fully unalienated instinctual ="trms">aesthetic gratification ='lgc'>--through='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quantifiable and manageable economy of ex="trms">citation (within an organized and controllable body)
biological romanticism
="trms">anxiety of overstimulation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> power of sug="trms">gestion
="large lg26" stl="font-size:102%">
attention ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Nietzsche's reality of drives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud's libidinal body (='lgc'>=/= physiological body) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*drives (='lgc'>=/= instincts) not tied to ="trms">specific conditions of satisfaction, are subsumed to an open-ended ‘plasticity’ (susceptible to substitution)
drive constantly misses its aim
(for Seurat, Fere, ="ppl">Nietzsche='lgc'>:)
art='lgc'> = physics (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">semiology) ='lgc'>: the ="trms">question of meaning in art was not about re="trms">presentation but a ="trms">relation of forces ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for Seurat color was not something accessible as a sign to a sovereign gaze but was an ="trms">interpretation made by the body
(both Seurat ='lgc'>[in his painting='lgc'>] and ="ppl">Nietzsche ='lgc'>[in will to power='lgc'>] have felt that there was) an extreme calm in certain ='strcls'>*sensations of rapture='strcls'>* ='lgc'>~ extra retardation of the feeling of time and space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the classical style is essentially a re="trms">presentation of this calm, simplification, abbreviation, concentration ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (='qstn'>?="frds">Sina's paintings) logical and ="trms">geometrical simplification ='lgc'><='lgc'>== enhancement of strength='strcls'>*!
a lot of artists are still busy with='lgc'>:
stimulus-="trms">response mechanisms
='strcls'>**="trms">techniques for the external management of ="trms">aesthetic ="trms">response='strcls'>** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quantifiable emotional engineering
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eszter directly
(the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of this discourse lies in 19th century automatic behaviour and nervous ="trms">response, ="trms">nature of mass subjectivity and desire for ="trms">social ="trms">integration, and since Seurat in visual art)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">spectator='lgc'>: a being that is acted apon
(does the artist want the ="trms">spectator “obey” a predetermined program of effects='qstn'>? specially in theater... even if we say this subject ='lgc'>[hypothetical individual observer='lgc'>] is a creative inventive affirmative body ='lgc'>--still='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pre="trms">supposing ='strcls'>**a subject that is a unity with a conscious will to be overcome='strcls'>** ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> ="trms">method)
putting a little onlooker at the bottom of my paintings ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? potential objects of ="trms">techniques for the control and management of perception and attention
(what are ="frds scrmbld">Foad's such objects='qstn'>?)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">question of ='strcls'>*how a sensory ="trms">world is dismantled, synthesized, and re="trms">presented (='lgc'>~ my paintings) is inseparable from the problem of how a ="trms">world of objects, individuals, and ="trms">social ="trms">relations (='lgc'>~ my performances) organizes itself='strcls'>*
what concerns Seurat (in ="trms">different terms of color image or human figures) is a ='strcls'>***tension between cohesion and dis="trms">integration='strcls'>*** (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that has been also my constant ="trms">aesthetic concern)
='lgc'>--this is evident in ='mywrk'>my work='lgc'>:
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*my paintings busy with='lgc'>] ="trms">questions of how diverse stimuli become tentatively “bound” into a coherent constellation
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*my performances busy with='lgc'>] ="trms">questions of how contents referring to a ="trms">social ="trms">world are fused or ="trms">integrated into a ="trms">network of ="trms">relations
(in ='mywrk'>my work) experimenting with='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•the unity of subjective experience (myself performing under influence, mad ="trms">lectures, ="trms">excessive synthesis, pathological and disruptive ="trms">storytelling)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">integrity of ="trms">social institution and processes (the loci and conditions of us coming together, space of art)
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">social tranquility ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> economic productivity
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">social fantasy of “solidarity” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> health and functional unity, individuals transformed into “="trms">social beings”
in a way most of us artists unconsciously in some way in an utopian projection of a sensory wholeness and fulfillment
(dream of) fabricators of powerful ="trms">imaginary ="trms">social ="trms">figurations
Durkheim and Seurat's ="trms">question of ="trms">social ='and'>& sensory='lgc'>: from what viewpoints significant manifestation of organization become apprehensible
my paintings
="lsts lst1">•(unstatistical) distribution of isolated and ="trms">categorized units ='lgc'><='lgc'>== additive principle of formal adjacency ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- (my belief='lgc'>:) depleted atomic ="trms">relations ='lgc'>[should='lgc'>] predominate beneath the spurious appearance of ="trms">social concord ='lgc'>[in my ="trms">world='lgc'>: ="nms">Iran='lgc'>]
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? ho="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic mode of as="trms">sociation (='lgc'>=/= my performances) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? desire for (="trms">modern forms of) cohesion (in the absence of inflexible forms ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ dis="trms">integration of the mechanical solidarity of tradition, ="trms">religion, myth, consanguinity='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? wanting an ='strcls'>*o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal solidarity='strcls'>* (='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to the image of the ‘harmonious vision of industrial ="trms">society’ in my early paintings, self-regulating landscapes of feedback loops ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*state of equilibrium='strcls'>* that i wanted to achieve in the painting not ="trms">symbolically)
(i prefer ='strcls'>*pseudo solidarity='strcls'>*)
emergence of aggregates
manifestations of complexities
(this is happening in)
late 19th century is also the age of attempting to validate a relatively stable and domesticated image of the dynamism and destructiveness of capital
="trms">modernity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> state of harmonious equilibrium ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">interaction in ="trms">relation of agreement and ="trms">mutuality ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> new set of moral imperative ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*solidarity='strcls'>*='lgc'>: the duty to become a “="trms">social being” (='lgc'>~ to become ="trms">socialized in ="trms">relation to a wide range of institutions)
anomie='lgc'>: breakdown of an organized set of connections and adjacencies, deranges a normally regulated flow of ="trms">communication and feedback (='lgc'>=/= solidarity) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> thermodynamic framework
anomie (used to be) a celebrated passage is when the individual worker is no longer the living cell moved by continual contact with neighboring cells (='lgc'>=/= now in late liberal capitalism anomie is the mode of labor)
anomie (in thermodynamic framework) describes a statistical distribution of elements in which insufficient contact or adjacency prevents the flow of messages our information within the ="trms">system as a whole. ="trms">systemwide increase of local zones of dis="trms">sociation and dis="trms">integration ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- Durkheim
(Durkheim was ="trms">writing at the time of) crisis of ="trms">social cohesion within a ="trms">transitional period ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a ="trms">systematic ="trms">response was being shaped (foreshadowed in several of Seurat's major works) -='strcls'>*-='strcls'>*-='strcls'>*='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the making of a ="trms">society whose effective unity was founded on the ubiquity of ='strcls'>*="trms">spectacular ="trms">consumption through mass media and ="trms">technologies of illusion='strcls'>*
if ='strcls'>*="trms">religion='strcls'>* was the key “collective re="trms">presentation” (in Durkheim pre="trms">modern mechanical solidarity) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">spectacle='strcls'>* was to become the primary simulation of cohesion and unification within 20th century ="trms">modernity='strcls'>****
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Debord='lgc'>:) capitalism's solidarity='lgc'>: unity of subjects in their very separatedness
(="ppl">="ppl">Crary >) Seurat's entire visual output='lgc'>: ='lgc'>[="trms">systematic movement between:='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•large engineered re="trms">presentation of ="trms">social collectivities (='lgc'>~ crowds)
="lsts lst1">•images of isolation and separation
“='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]the unity of his optical aggregates was always an ephemeral subjective construction that never objectively modified the abstract and segmented status of his dots, so his assembling of provisional ="trms">social aggregates never alters the obdurately insular character of their individual human character.”
Seurat stakes out a darker and more skeptical ="trms">position than Durkheim about the possibility of ='strcls'>*="trms">positive knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of “="trms">social reality”='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> his works are determined by a sense of ='strcls'>**impalpability and evanescence of the ="trms">social itself='strcls'>**
(what is my “="trms">sociology” in ='mywrk'>my works='qstn'>?)
='lgc'>{ great ="trms">social catastrophes of the 19th century ='lgc'>+ accumulated bourgeois ="trms">anxiety over the disorders of revolution (1848 and 1871) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (emergence of French 1890s of) “="trms">science” of ="trms">sociology
let's stop mourning about the earlier model of political theater being displaced by by the ="trms">modernized forms of ="trms">spectacle (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> my critic on Kurzgesagt is outdated='qstn'>?)
(for Seurat='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*art work='lgc'> = soli="trms">citation of attention='strcls'>*
play of attraction and absence (in ="frds">Sina and ="frds scrmbld">Foad's work)='lgc'>:
a visual or performative work designed around the cancellation and suspension of what it promises
Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="frds">Sina and) ="frds scrmbld">Foad's ob="trms">literation of the scenographic conditions of the work even as he simulates their persistence
Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='mywrk'>my work has always been scenic, ="trms">positioning its viewers before an apparently ="trms">stagelike space ='lgc'>[without orthogonal guides ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> assemblage of disjunct planner elements='lgc'>]
my (painting before and even more now) mimics a classical theatrical space, and (in play with that) at the same time it establishes an illusory ="trms">world extending away from the ="trms">spectator (collapsing that “="trms">stage,” dramatically sealing off possible avenues of entry into the work for our eyes) ='lgc'>==='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a ="trms">world related to the viewer's own point of view
deliberate archaism
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> medieval mystery plays)
closed-off antiscenic space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> forms of popular display (shadow figure, puppet theatre,) that only simulate or evoke the “cube” of theatrical space
to be careful with ='strcls'>*grid='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>--="trms">stories that the grid tells='lgc'>--='strcls'>*='lgc'>]
(="ppl">="ppl">Crary > Krauss='lgc'>:) by its very abstraction, grid conveys one of the basic laws of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*punctuality='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="nms">apass psychological optics and image of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge incorporated in ="trms">presentation of projects, ='at'>#workshop on topology='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the separation of the perceptua[...]