[...]br />
uprooting of perception from any stable space-time coordination

the ="trms">history of capitalism is the ="trms">history of (effective operation of) overcoming obstacles of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•anything with a permanent stable location (incapable of being inserted into circulation)
="lsts lst1">•anything that is part of a ="trms">code (traditional or established pattern of behaviour, resisting deployment in ="trms">networks of abstract ="trms">relations)


="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> (images productive of labor usually end up ="trms">intermingling the re="trms">presentation of that land as a ='strcls'>*tranquil earthly paradise='strcls'>*)


an image='lgc'>: self-evident ="trms">presence of native workers on the coffee plantation; they remain invisible except as abstract components within flow of capital or as “="trms">naturalized” elements within an ="trms">imaginary landscape

an image='lgc'>: workers gathering and packing beans under midday clouds; a fraudulently homogenous and static image of elements (bodies and land) which have become quantified and exchangeable, part of an unstable ="trms">system ='strcls'>*incapable of immobilization='strcls'>*. it discloses the antinomic coexistence of living labor power (with its irreducible existential temporalities) and the tendency of capital to “circulation without circulation time.” the violence and ="trms">social devastation underlying this all over distribution of human being within the lush vegetation of an apparently pre="trms">modern landscape...


(my period of abstract digital image glitch='lgc'>: play of machinic objectivity ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) Muybridge's 1870s photograph of The Horse Motion ='lgc'>==> “='strcls'>*to be outside of='strcls'>* a syntactical and semantic organization that supported ="trms">historical ="trms">narrative”
="prgrph">-the machinic objectivity in play does not stake out a subjective ="trms">position from which a “this happened” or a sense of “having been there” could be authenticated’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= my later ="trms">lecture-performances='lgc'>]. they are instances of ='strcls'>*combinatorial logic='strcls'>* in which the individual images, although ostensibly part of a linear sequence and syntax ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the way Julia noted ‘adjacency’ in the way i was ="trms">presenting my image series='lgc'>], have a (‘newly’ in 19th century) ='strcls'>***autonomous, floating identity.='strcls'>*** their immobilization and groundlessness and mutable temporality is also the condition of their detachment from any binding continuities or ="trms">trajectories, in a ='strcls'>*de="trms">coding of perceptual experience='strcls'>*='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> also relevant for ="frds scrmbld">Foad's a="trms">historical “intuition"='lgc'>]. ='lgc'>{this is could be related to a deeper ="trms">relation with my youth's reality and its perceptions ='lgc'>=/= attachment to binding continuities and ="trms">trajectories are central to my recent work='strcls'>****='lgc'>}
='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•rationalization and quantification of movement and time (='lgc'>==> mechanization of the body)
="lsts lst1">•posing p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lural scattering of attention (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds">Sina)
="lsts lst1">•possibility of unforeseen perceptual synthesis (outside of any disciplinary imperatives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Foad)


Kaiserpanorama ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> industrialized sequence of disconnected images
Muybridge's work ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> repetitive but disjunct series

(="ppl">="ppl">Crary shows='lgc'>:) demise of the punctual or anchored classical observer begins in the early 19th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a new unstable attentive subject (with a ='strcls'>*vision refigured as dynamic, temporal, com="trms">posite='strcls'>*) ='lgc'>==> ="trms">consumer/="trms">agent of/in synthesis of a proliferating diversity of reality-effects (='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> digital and cybernetic imperatives of our ="trms">present time)


invention
dissolution
creative synthesis

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

antimony='lgc'>: contra="trms">diction between two equally reasonable statements

the antinomic character (of my conceptual schema='lgc'>: ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigidity and banality, attention and dis="trms">integration,,, ='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*an object outside its logical control='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-charged with antagonistic forces, like Seurat, my ="trms">lectures (since now 2018) negate a possibility of an attentive closure, even as it fervently attempts to generate its own ="trms">internal ="trms">formula for perceptual ="trms">presence and unity. like Seurat's Parade de Cirque, it operates in a ceaseless play of disclosure and concealment. ='lgc'>[is it time to change='qstn'>?='lgc'>])

Seurat preoccupation with non="trms">specific temporalities

(estrangement from) a dream of instinctual wholeness

harmonious sensory utopia

="prgrph">-my ="trms">lecture-performances constitute a provisional realm of freedom for an individual observer ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ myself='lgc'>: a psychic, ="trms">social, ="trms">imaginary ="trms">position called being an ="nms">Iranian='lgc'>--='lgc'>] of a prismatic ="trms">past, coinciding with a proliferation of discourse ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= shifting p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of ‘centers'='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dream of subjective freedom ='lgc'>+ effects of power

perhaps ='mywrk'>my work is inseparable from (the consequences of the emergence of) ='strcls'>*models of subjective vision='strcls'>*

="prgrph">-use of optical mixture in ='mywrk'>my work.
how important is the retina (for any artist)='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->(the ="trms">question of) the seeing body in all of its physiological ="trms">density ='lgc'>+ ambiguous ="trms">position of that body within conceptions of visuality
="lsts lst1">•chromatic or luminous effects on the body

="large lg1" stl="font-size:125%"> physiological regime of visuality (beginning with Thomas Young and ="ppl">Goethe, developed by Johannes Müller, Helmholtz and others) ='lgc'>=/= renaissance-based pictorial order


collapse of ='strcls'>*camera obscura='strcls'>* model of vision ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> emergence of ='strcls'>*psychological optics='strcls'>*


1890s
construction of various nonreferential models of perception
='lgc'>+
="trms">pragmatic functions of an observing subject

='lgc'>='lgc'>--> status of vision and mind
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature and value of sensation
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">presentation of ="trms">social facts


central to many developments in the visual culture in the West in late 19th century='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*="trms">questions of perceptual and cognitive synthesis='strcls'>*


="trms">Gestalt theory ='lgc'>==> essential primacy and ethical value of the ‘whole’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> an observer who perceives organized structures, who is marked by innate form-giving and form-apprehending capacities ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an effort to endow human perception with an inherent meaningfulness, coherence, and even orderliness (amid its perceptual decom="trms">position within 20th century ="trms">spectacular culture) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>[preparing for the perceptual logic of high capitalism:='lgc'>] it was not the attentive subject who identified form from a larger background, but rather the reverse, that “good” form had the capacity to produce attentiveness in a subject
(="trms">Gestalt theory was a dream of='lgc'>:)
the reciprocal affirmation of the unity of the individual subject ='and'>& the unified object of perception
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bisect visual filed into='lgc'>: significant “figure” and insignificant “background"='lgc'>]


="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> impression ادراک/برداشت ='lgc'>=/= inference استنباط/استنتاج
(="ppl">Peirce='lgc'>:) color is not an impression, but an inference


(the last kind of) “="trms">natural” sign available to a visual artist


="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%"> Seurat (like many others around that time) was testing the limits and possibilities of an observer attentive to a heterogeneity and ="trms">simultaneity of sensory ="trms">data
='lgc'>[="trms">specifically:='lgc'>] how an irreducible p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of luminous information could be organized and perceived coherently ... rearranged and made exchangeable


='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Laura='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*designated bodies='strcls'>* (are never permanent='lgc'>[!!='qstn'>?='lgc'>])
="prgrph">-is she actually busy with destiny and destined bodies='qstn'>? (for ="frds scrmbld">Laura='lgc'>:) design='lgc'> = destiny
="prgrph">-is she going to redesignate='qstn'>? how can she not='qstn'>? if she believes that the designated bodies are al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready on a fixed destiny or destination
='lgc'>[designate='lgc'>: appointed or made clear which place or direction spatially or ="trms">figuratively. related to ='strcls'>*design ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> destine='strcls'>*='lgc'>]


early 1890s
the time when western ="trms">science accepts the notion “that there might be several ways to re="trms">present the same fact” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> elephant parable ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">situated knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges='lgc'>]

="large lg5" stl="font-size:158%"> 1850s and 1860s
construction of models of the reflex functioning of the human nervous ="trms">system ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature of human ="trms">response to external stimulation


dynamogenesis (='lgc'>~ every state of consciousness tends to realize itself in an appropriate muscular movement)
vision reformed in 19th century='lgc'>: nonoptical modal of attentive subject, not the one who sees, rather, the subject is the one who is susceptible to psychomotor induction
(what was once figured as visual re="trms">presentation are now) the abstract and quantified reactions of the body as a com="trms">posite set of physical ="trms">systems
='lgc'>--Fere='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">instrumental relocation of vision (from a dis="trms">embodied and punctual ="trms">system of images) to an ="trms">interplay of forces and motor reactions (in which re="trms">presentation is irrelevant)
='lgc'>[this is inseparable from the larger project of ="trms">scientific amelioration of collective emotional hygiene of the 19th century='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*sensation='lgc'>: part of a sequence of events (in which the end point is not an inner state, such as='lgc'>: knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, cognition, perception, rather='lgc'>:) it is that which culminates in movement

some[...]