[...]t a subjective ="trms">position from which a “this happened” or a sense of “having been there” could be authenticated’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= my later ="trms">lecture-performances='lgc'>]. they are instances of ='strcls'>*combinatorial logic='strcls'>* in which the individual images, although ostensibly part of a linear sequence and syntax ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the way Julia noted ‘adjacency’ in the way i was ="trms">presenting my image series='lgc'>], have a (‘newly’ in 19th century) ='strcls'>***autonomous, floating identity.='strcls'>*** their immobilization and groundlessness and mutable temporality is also the condition of their detachment from any binding continuities or ="trms">trajectories, in a ='strcls'>*de="trms">coding of perceptual experience='strcls'>*='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> also relevant for ="frds scrmbld">Foad's a="trms">historical “intuition"='lgc'>]. ='lgc'>{this is could be related to a deeper ="trms">relation with my youth's reality and its perceptions ='lgc'>=/= attachment to binding continuities and ="trms">trajectories are central to my recent work='strcls'>****='lgc'>}
='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•rationalization and quantification of movement and time (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> mechanization of the body)
="lsts lst1">•posing p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lural scattering of attention (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds">Sina)
="lsts lst1">•possibility of unforeseen perceptual synthesis (outside of any disciplinary imperatives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Foad)


Kaiserpanorama ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> industrialized sequence of disconnected images
Muybridge's work ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> repetitive but disjunct series

(="ppl">="ppl">Crary shows='lgc'>:) demise of the punctual or anchored classical observer begins in the early 19th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a new unstable attentive subject (with a ='strcls'>*vision refigured as dynamic, temporal, com="trms">posite='strcls'>*) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">consumer/="trms">agent of/in synthesis of a proliferating diversity of reality-effects (='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> digital and cybernetic imperatives of our ="trms">present time)


invention
dissolution
creative synthesis

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

antimony='lgc'>: contra="trms">diction between two equally reasonable statements

="large lg34" stl="font-size:116%"> the antinomic character (of my conceptual schema='lgc'>: ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigidity and banality, attention and dis="trms">integration,,, ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*an object outside its logical control='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-charged with antagonistic forces, like Seurat, my ="trms">lectures (since now 2018) negate a possibility of an attentive closure, even as it fervently attempts to generate its own ="trms">internal ="trms">formula for perceptual ="trms">presence and unity. like Seurat's Parade de Cirque, it operates in a ceaseless play of disclosure and concealment. ='lgc'>[is it time to change='qstn'>?='lgc'>])

Seurat preoccupation with non="trms">specific temporalities

(estrangement from) a dream of instinctual wholeness

harmonious sensory utopia

="prgrph">-my ="trms">lecture-performances constitute a provisional realm of freedom for an individual observer ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ myself='lgc'>: a psychic, ="trms">social, ="trms">imaginary ="trms">position called being an ="nms">Iranian='lgc'>--='lgc'>] of a prismatic ="trms">past, coinciding with a proliferation of discourse ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= shifting p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of ‘centers'='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dream of subjective freedom ='lgc'>+ effects of power

perhaps ='mywrk'>my work is inseparable from (the consequences of the emergence of) ='strcls'>*models of subjective vision='strcls'>*

="prgrph">-use of optical mixture in ='mywrk'>my work.
how important is the retina (for any artist)='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->(the ="trms">question of) the seeing body in all of its physiological ="trms">density ='lgc'>+ ambiguous ="trms">position of that body within conceptions of visuality
="lsts lst1">•chromatic or luminous effects on the body

physiological regime of visuality (beginning with Thomas Young and ="ppl">Goethe, developed by Johannes Müller, Helmholtz and others) ='lgc'>=/= renaissance-based pictorial order


collapse of ='strcls'>*camera obscura='strcls'>* model of vision ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> emergence of ='strcls'>*psychological optics='strcls'>*


1890s
construction of various nonreferential models of perception
='lgc'>+
="trms">pragmatic functions of an observing subject

='lgc'>='lgc'>--> status of vision and mind
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature and value of sensation
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">presentation of ="trms">social facts


central to many developments in the visual culture in the West in late 19th century='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*="trms">questions of perceptual and cognitive synthesis='strcls'>*


="trms">Gestalt theory ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> essential primacy and ethical value of the ‘whole’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> an observer who perceives organized structures, who is marked by innate form-giving and form-apprehending capacities ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an effort to endow human perception with an inherent meaningfulness, coherence, and even orderliness (amid its perceptual decom="trms">position within 20th century ="trms">spectacular culture) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>[preparing for the perceptual logic of high capitalism:='lgc'>] it was not the attentive subject who identified form from a larger background, but rather the reverse, that “good” form had the capacity to produce attentiveness in a subject
(="trms">Gestalt theory was a dream of='lgc'>:)
the reciprocal affirmation of the unity of the individual subject ='and'>& the unified object of perception
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bisect visual filed into='lgc'>: significant “figure” and insignificant “background"='lgc'>]


impression ادراک/برداشت ='lgc'>=/= inference استنباط/استنتاج
(="ppl">Peirce='lgc'>:) color is not an impression, but an inference


(the last kind of) “="trms">natural” sign available to a visual artist


Seurat (like many others around that time) was testing the limits and possibilities of an observer attentive to a heterogeneity and ="trms">simultaneity of sensory ="trms">data
='lgc'>[="trms">specifically:='lgc'>] how an irreducible p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of luminous information could be organized and perceived coherently ... rearranged and made exchangeable


='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Laura='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*designated bodies='strcls'>* (are never permanent='lgc'>[!!='qstn'>?='lgc'>])
="prgrph">-is she actually busy with destiny and destined bodies='qstn'>? (for ="frds scrmbld">Laura='lgc'>:) design='lgc'> = destiny
="prgrph">-is she going to redesignate='qstn'>? how can she not='qstn'>? if she believes that the designated bodies are al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready on a fixed destiny or destination
='lgc'>[designate='lgc'>: appointed or made clear which place or direction spatially or ="trms">figuratively. related to ='strcls'>*design ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> destine='strcls'>*='lgc'>]


early 1890s
the time when western ="trms">science accepts the notion “that there might be several ways to re="trms">present the same fact” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> elephant parable ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">situated knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges='lgc'>]

1850s and 1860s
construction of models of the reflex functioning of the human nervous ="trms">system ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature of human ="trms">response to external stimulation


dynamogenesis (='lgc'>~ every state of consciousness tends to realize itself in an appropriate muscular movement)
vision reformed in 19th century='lgc'>: nonoptical modal of attentive subject, not the one who sees, rather, the subject is the one who is susceptible to psychomotor induction
(what was once figured as visual re="trms">presentation are now) the abstract and quantified reactions of the body as a com="trms">posite set of physical ="trms">systems
='lgc'>--Fere='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">instrumental relocation of vision (from a dis="trms">embodied and punctual ="trms">system of images) to an ="trms">interplay of forces and motor reactions (in which re="trms">presentation is irrelevant)
='lgc'>[this is inseparable from the larger project of ="trms">scientific amelioration of collective emotional hygiene of the 19th century='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*sensation='lgc'>: part of a sequence of events (in which the end point is not an inner state, such as='lgc'>: knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, cognition, perception, rather='lgc'>:) it is that which culminates in movement

some of the 1850s rationalizing ambitions (of widesp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read philosophical and ="trms">scientific conceptualization of a fundamental ="trms">relation between sensation and motor behaviour) indirectly informs Seurat's work ='lgc'>--proposing='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ sensory stimuli ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> motor expression (in the perceiver) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the ="trms">question of) ='strcls'>**human ="trms">response based on bypassing of conscious thought altogether='strcls'>**

(very important for ="nms">iranian artists='lgc'>: the ="trms">question of the ='strcls'>*rational mind of an observer='strcls'>* and intellectual construction directed to that ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> status of a conscious observer)
="prgrph">-producing effects involuntary in the observer
="prgrph">-(="frds scrmbld">Foad and ="frds">Sina engaging with an) ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively optical consciousness of the individual human subject ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> can we go beyond that='qstn'>? to which philosophical ="trms">sensual ethics of bodily awareness ="frds scrmbld">Foad and ="frds">Sina are optically bind to='qstn'>? which anti-optical ="trms">aesthetic ="trms">positions are available to us='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•="frds scrmbld">Foad's neoimpressionist='lgc'>: implication of total organic resonance ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>='lgc'>{ from organic activity of perception ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> transforming physical existence ='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•="frds">Sina's Einfuhlung='lgc'>: mode of intense perceptual absorption in which lines and forms are experienced as catalysts for vitalization of the ="trms">imagination


Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dream of a fully unalienated instinctual ="trms">aesthetic gratification ='lgc'>--through='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quantifiable and manageable economy of ex="trms">citation (within an organized and controllable body)

biological romanticism

="trms">anxiety of overstimulation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> power of sug="trms">gestion


attention ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Nietzsche's reality of drives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud's libidinal body (='lgc'>=/= physiological body) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*drives (='lgc'>=/= instincts) not tied to ="trms">specific conditions of satisfaction, are subsumed to an open-ended ‘plasticity’ (susceptible to substitution)
drive constantly misses its aim


(for Seurat, Fere, ="ppl">Nietzsche='lgc'>:)
art='lgc'> = physics (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">semiology) ='lgc'>: the ="trms">question of meaning in art was not about re="trms">presentation but a ="trms">relation of forces ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for Seurat color was not something accessible as a sign to a sovereign gaze but was an ="trms">interpretation made by the body

(both Seurat ='lgc'>[in his painting='lgc'>] and ="ppl">Nietzsche ='lgc'>[in will to power='lgc'>] have felt that there was) an extreme calm in certain ='strcls'>*sensations of rapture='strcls'>* ='lgc'>~ extra retardation of the feeling of time and space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the classical style is essentially a re="trms">presentation of this calm, simplification, abbreviation, concentration ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (='qstn'>?="frds">Sina's paintings) logical and ="trms">geometrical simplification ='lgc'><='lgc'>== enhancement of strength='strcls'>*!


a lot of artists are still busy with='lgc'>:
stimulus-="trms">response mechanisms
='strcls'>**="trms">techniques for the external management of ="trms">aesthetic ="trms">response='strcls'>** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quantifiable emotional engineering
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eszter directly
(the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of this discourse lies in 19th century automatic behaviour and nervous ="trms">response, ="trms">nature of mass subjectivity and desire for ="trms">social ="trms">integration, and since Seurat in visual art)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">spectator='lgc'>: a being that is acted apon
(does the artist want the ="trms">spectator “obey” a predetermined program of effects='qstn'>? specially in theater... even if we say this subject ='lgc'>[hypothetical individual observer='lgc'>] is a creative inventive affirmative body ='lgc'>--still='lgc'>='lgc'>--> pre="trms">supposing ='strcls'>**a subject that is a unity with a conscious will to be overcome='strcls'>** ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> ="trms">method)

putting a little onlooker at the bottom of my paintings ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? potential objects of ="trms">techniques for the control and management of perception and attention
(what are ="frds scrmbld">Foad's such objects='qstn'>?)

='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">question of ='strcls'>*how a sensory ="trms">world is dismantled, synthesized, and re="trms">presented (='lgc'>~ my paintings) is inseparable from the problem of how a ="trms">world of objects, individuals, and ="trms">social ="trms">relations (='lgc'>~ my performances) organizes itself='strcls'>*

what concerns Seurat (in ="trms">different terms of color image or human figures) is a ='strcls'>***tension between cohesion and dis="trms">integration='strcls'>*** (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that has been also my constant ="trms">aesthetic concern)
='lgc'>--this is evident in ='mywrk'>my work='lgc'>:
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*my paintings busy with='lgc'>] ="trms">questions of how diverse stimuli become tentatively “bound” into a coherent constellation
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*my performances busy with='lgc'>] ="trms">questions of how contents referring to a ="trms">social ="trms">world are fused or ="trms">integrated into a ="trms">network of ="trms">relations

(in ='mywrk'>my work) experimenting with='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•the unity of subjective experience (myself performing under influence, mad ="trms">lectures, ="trms">excessive synthesis, pathological and disruptive ="trms">storytelling)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">integrity of ="trms">social institution and processes (the loci and conditions of us coming together, space of art)
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">social tranquility ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> economic productivity
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">social fantasy of “solidarity” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> health and functional unity, individuals transformed into “="trms">social beings”

in a way most of us artists unconsciously in some way in an utopian projection of a sensory wholeness and fulfillment
(dream of) fabricators of powerful ="trms">imaginary ="trms">social ="trms">figurations

Durkheim and Seurat's ="trms">question of ="trms">social ='and'>& sensory='lgc'>: from what viewpoints significant manifestation of organization become apprehensible


my paintings
="lsts lst1">•(unstatistical) distribution of isolated and ="trms">categorized units ='lgc'><='lgc'>== additive principle of formal adjacency ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- (my belief='lgc'>:) depleted atomic ="trms">relations ='lgc'>[should='lgc'>] predominate beneath the spurious appearance of ="trms">social concord ='lgc'>[in my ="trms">world='lgc'>: ="nms">Iran='lgc'>]
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? ho="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic mode of as="trms">sociation (='lgc'>=/= my performances) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? desire for (="trms">modern forms of) cohesion (in the absence of inflexible forms ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ dis="trms">integration of the mechanical solidarity of tradition, ="trms">religion, myth, consanguinity='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? wanting an ='strcls'>*o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal solidarity='strcls'>* (='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to the image of the ‘harmonious vision of industrial ="trms">society’ in my early paintings, self-regulating landscapes of feedback loops ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*state of equilibrium='strcls'>* that i wanted to achieve in the painting not ="trms">symbolically)

(i prefer ='strcls'>*pseudo solidarity='strcls'>*)

emergence of aggregates
manifestations of complexities

(this is happening in)
late 19th century is also the age of attempting to validate a relatively stable and domesticated image of the dynamism and destructiveness of capital

="trms">modernity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> state of harmonious equilibrium ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">interaction in ="trms">relation of agreement and ="trms">mutuality ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> new set of moral imperative ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*solidarity='strcls'>*='lgc'>: the duty to become a “="trms">social being” (='lgc'>~ to become ="trms">socialized in ="trms">relation to a wide range of institutions)


="large lg1" stl="font-size:131%"> anomie='lgc'>: breakdown of an organized set of connections and adjacencies, deranges a normally regulated flow of ="trms">communication and feedback (='lgc'>=/= solidarity) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> thermodynamic framework

anomie (used to be) a celebrated passage is when the individual worker is no longer the living cell moved by continual contact with neighboring cells (='lgc'>=/= now in late liberal capitalism anomie is the mode of labor)

anomie (in thermodynamic framework) describes a statistical distribution of elements in which insufficient contact or adjacency prevents the flow of messages our information within the ="trms">system as a whole. ="trms">systemwide increase of local zones of dis="trms">sociation and dis="trms">integration ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- Durkheim



(Durkheim was ="trms">writing at the time of) crisis of ="trms">social cohesion within a ="trms">transitional period ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a ="trms">systematic ="trms">response was being shaped (foreshadowed in several of Seurat's major works) -='strcls'>*-='strcls'>*-='strcls'>*='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the making of a ="trms">society whose effective unity was founded on the ubiquity of ='strcls'>*="trms">spectacular ="trms">consumption through mass media and ="trms">technologies of illusion='strcls'>*
if ='strcls'>*="trms">religion='strcls'>* was the key “collective re="trms">presentation” (in Durkheim pre="trms">modern mechanical solidarity) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">spectacle='strcls'>* was to become the primary simulation of cohesion and unification within 20th century ="trms">modernity='strcls'>****
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Debord='lgc'>:) capitalism's solidarity='lgc'>: unity of subjects in their very separatedness


(="ppl">="ppl">Crary >) Seurat's entire visual output='lgc'>: ='lgc'>[="trms">systematic movement between:='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•large engineered re="trms">presentation of ="trms">social collectivities (='lgc'>~ crowds)
="lsts lst1">•images of isolation and separation

“='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]the unity of his optical aggregates was always an ephemeral subjective construction that never objectively modified the abstract and segmented status of his dots, so his assembling of provisional ="trms">social aggregates never alters the obdurately insular character of their individual human character.”

Seurat stakes out a darker and more skeptical ="trms">position than Durkheim about the possibility of ='strcls'>*="trms">positive knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of “="trms">social reality”='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> his works are determined by a sense of ='strcls'>**impalpability and evanescence of the ="trms">social itself='strcls'>**


(what is my “="trms">sociology” in ='mywrk'>my works='qstn'>?)


='lgc'>{ great ="trms">social catastrophes of the 19th century ='lgc'>+ accumulated bourgeois ="trms">anxiety over the disorders of revolution (1848 and 1871) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (emergence of French 1890s of) “="trms">science” of ="trms">sociology


let's stop mourning about the earlier model of political theater being displaced by by the ="trms">modernized forms of ="trms">spectacle (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> my critic on Kurzgesagt is outdated='qstn'>?)


(for Seurat='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*art work='lgc'> = soli="trms">citation of attention='strcls'>*

play of attraction and absence (in ="frds">Sina and ="frds scrmbld">Foad's work)='lgc'>:
a visual or performative work designed around the cancellation and suspension of what it promises

Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="frds">Sina and) ="frds scrmbld">Foad's ob="trms">literation of the scenographic conditions of the work even as he simulates their persistence

Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='mywrk'>my work has always been scenic, ="trms">positioning its viewers before an apparently ="trms">stagelike space ='lgc'>[without orthogonal guides ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> assemblage of disjunct planner elements='lgc'>]
my (painting before and even more now) mimics a classical theatrical space, and (in play with that) at the same time it establishes an illusory ="trms">world extending away from the ="trms">spectator (collapsing that “="trms">stage,” dramatically sealing off possible avenues of entry into the work for our eyes) ='lgc'>==='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a ="trms">world related to the viewer's own point of view

deliberate archaism
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> medieval mystery plays)
closed-off antiscenic space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> forms of popular display (shadow figure, puppet theatre,) that only simulate or evoke the “cube” of theatrical space


="large lg34" stl="font-size:121%"> to be careful with ='strcls'>*grid='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>--="trms">stories that the grid tells='lgc'>--='strcls'>*='lgc'>]
(="ppl">="ppl">Crary > Krauss='lgc'>:) by its very abstraction, grid conveys one of the basic laws of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*punctuality='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="nms">apass psychological optics and image of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge incorporated in ="trms">presentation of projects, ='at'>#workshop on topology='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the separation of the perceptual screen from that of the “real” ="trms">world
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]grid='lgc'>: (19th century) emblem of the infrastructure of vision ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> becoming an increasingly insistent and visible feature of neo-impressionist painting
(='lgc'>='lgc'>~/= ="ppl">="ppl">Crary is hesitant to characterize Seurat's flatness structurally as grid)
="prgrph">-tabular field with rows and columns making impossible a point to point (= punctual) ="trms">relation between ="trms">spectator and image

(="ppl">Martin Jay='lgc'>:) two scopic regimes='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•metric and homogenous tableau loosely synonymous with classical space
="lsts lst1">•decentered and destabilized perceptual regime with its mobile and ="trms">embodied observer

the evocation of a scenographic setup in Seurat (Parade de cirque) is a ="trms">veil over the desiccated, nonhomogenous, and additive construction of the work


frontality and unity of framing (of “primitive” cinema...)


='lgc'>[='qstn'>?do we need to='lgc'>] (in an illusionist mode) satisfy the principle of unitary organization of the scenic space


(how should you be concerned with ='lgc'>[public record='lgc'>] of your intellectual and ="trms">aesthetic formations='qstn'>?)



Seurat's Parade de cirque ='lgc'>=/= ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo's Last Supper
(Seurat broke free from ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo, and i should from Seurat)

both of these paintings are concerned with the revelation of a mystery='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo='lgc'>: the mystery of ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Christianson">Christian sacrifice as it coincides with a lucid apprehension of in="trms">finite extension
="lsts lst1">•Seurat='lgc'>: the “mystery” of the disenchanted and quantitative order of capita="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list exchange (and its overturning of homogeneity and legibility of space)

witness to='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-holy ="trms">communion -="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo
="prgrph">-rituals intrinsic to ="trms">modernity -Seurat

in terms of orthogonal illustrated in ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo is precisely what Seurat dismantles in Parade de Cirque

the ="trms">question of value
movement of abstract quantities
(transactional dimensions of Seurat's work)

lost transparency='lgc'>:
how the use of money within ="trms">modernity transformed the ="trms">social character of exchange ='strcls'>***from something ="trms">interpersonal to an anonymous transaction='strcls'>*** at the distance (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Reza's hold-up of values, the dream of ="trms">interpersonal transaction and resistance of anonymity and distance)
='lgc'>[the problem that all artists have with money ='lgc'>--="ppl">Simmel='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>] ='strcls'>*a ="trms">priori equivalence of price (for all commodities) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> eliminate='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•deliberations and examinations of the buyer
="lsts lst1">•effects and elucidations of the seller
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> quick and in="trms">different economic transaction

="large lg18" stl="font-size:111%"> “selling tickets”='lgc'>: accumulated ="trms">social experience of separation='lgc'> = ='strcls'>*depersonalized exchange='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that which many artists are dealing with as a problem)
='lgc'>--Gouz='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]capitalism='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*dis="trms">affection of value='strcls'>* (the libidinal, the ="trms">intersubjective, the semantic are completely divorced from the economic ="trms">relation ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> economic sector ='lgc'>=/= semantic ="trms">affective investment)

Seurat's meditation on the emptiness of a ="trms">modern ="trms">relation of display and ="trms">consumption

cost of ad="trms">mission at two ="trms">different rates='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo='lgc'>: head of Jesus at the vanishing point of the window opening ="trms">onto in="trms">finite celestial space (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> regime of signs that possess intrinsic value ='lgc'>=/=)
="prgrph">-Seurat='lgc'>: price tag, grid space (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> regime of signs that are ="trms">symbols of value)


='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]scenic='lgc'>: determined by the ="trms">position of an (depicted) observer


ubiquity of the subjective experience of “shopping” ='and'>& its construction as ="trms">spectacle

‘price tag’='lgc'>: (one of the vanishing points of ="trms">modernity,) the draining away of the illusion of reference or stability

="large lg34" stl="font-size:132%"> ="trms">Poe's str="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger itinerary, a paradigmatic ="trms">articulation of ="trms">modern loneliness
“at no moment did he see that i watched him. he entered shop after shop, priced nothing, spoke no word, and look at the object with a vacant stare.”

process of circulation and convertibility
simulation inherent in the ="trms">literal ="trms">spectacle inseparable from the “semblance”(='lgc'>~ price tag)

(="ppl">Marx='lgc'>:) ‘price tag’='lgc'>: the ="trms">symbol of itself
“only fleeting, a reality destined constantly to disappear, to be suspended, not to be count as a de="trms">finitive realization but always only as an ="trms">intermediate, mediating realization. ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] it exists, therefore, in so far as it remains in this constant movement ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] its reality is not that it is the price but that it re="trms">presents it, is its re="trms">presentative='lgc'>--the ="trms">materially ="trms">present re="trms">presentative of the price, this of itself, and as such, of the exchange value of commodities.”


(we should ask the ="trms">question of “="trms">symbolism” at each age again and ="trms">differently)


(Brian Rotman='lgc'>:) an iso="trms">morphism (emerged in renaissance) between='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•vanishing point in visual re="trms">presentation
="lsts lst1">•use of zero in computation
="lsts lst1">•abstract money in economic exchange

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]vanishing point='lgc'>: a figure of the coincidence of the transcendent ='and'>& the ="trms">="trms">empirical
='lgc'>[Panofsky='lgc'>: perspective as ="trms">symbolic form='lgc'>: perspective in transforming the ‘ousia’ (reality) into ‘phainomenon’ (appearance), seams to reduce the divine to a mere subject ="trms">matter for human consciousness; but for that very reason, conversely, it'd expands human consciousness into a vessel for the divine='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an in="trms">finity not only prefigured in god, but indeed actually ="trms">embodied in ="trms">="trms">empirical reality ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>****in Last Supper the miraculous becomes the direct experience of the beholder, in that the super="trms">natural events in a sense erupt into his own, apparently ="trms">natural visual space='strcls'>****

effects of vanishing point

(in all my image assemblages there is a ="trms">system of fluid ="trms">relations in which subjectivity is ="trms">imagined ='lgc'>[not in terms of coincidence with a quantifiable point of view='lgc'>])='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in every image and diagram subjectivity (='lgc'>~ identity and reference) is ="trms">imagined in a ="trms">system of ="trms">relations ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eszter's binding order

zero
primal image of nothingness
="lsts lst1">•kabbalah
="lsts lst1">•the egg
="lsts lst1">•oroboros
="lsts lst1">•

my issue with contemporary ritual practices in the arts is that they are based the ="trms">symbolic privileging of the معنوی noumenal ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">phenomenal
(rituals that artists practice today, ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leonardo's Last Supper='lgc'>:) ="trms">symbolic opening to a noumenal ="trms">world ='lgc'>=/= facade of appearance and semblance
(='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? coalescence, knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge and diversity work, etc.)
i can't insist enough (learning from Seurat) that the foreclosure of the noumenal ="trms">world (the true ="trms">world) is inseparable from the fragility and insubstantiality of the apparent ="trms">world
(shabah az sanaat joda nist شبه و صنع)


a residue of an earlier ="trms">social ="trms">world (in which the sacred, the occult, and artmaking were much more closely tied together)
...Egyptian priest, medieval magus, Babylonian snake charmer, headsman or executioner,

sug="trms">gestion of magician ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> emblematic of a ="trms">modernized order of ="trms">spectacle ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mass management of attentiveness ='lgc'>+ its commodification ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*rationalized magic of a ="trms">technology of attraction='strcls'>* (that conceals its synthetic construction)

="large lg26" stl="font-size:103%"> op="trms">position of charismatic and bureaucratic domination

Weber's “="trms">routinizatiom"='lgc'> = castration of charisma (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> permanent institutional structures)
prophetic/oracular individual (has seen the extinction of his ="trms">society) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>==implying='lgc'>='lgc'>==> an unstable domination='lgc'>] ='lgc'>=/= administrated and rationalized order of a money economy

="large lg26" stl="font-size:135%"> priestly status of ="frds scrmbld">Elen in her performances implying an pathos and ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics of distance (and dismantling it='qstn'>?)

be careful with this liminal ="trms">positions='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•activation of a broken collective ="trms">memory
="lsts lst1">•im="trms">position of ="trms">modern oblivion on the other


="trms">presenting music='lgc'>:
="trms">socialized activity, indicating the ='strcls'>*superficial appearance of a collective reception='strcls'>*
immediacy of an audience
“physicality of music making itself” ='lgc'>--Leppert='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the sight of the body's labor to produce sound
19th century ideal of a musical performer as a quasi-sexual virtuoso

performing music ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sug="trms">gestion of collective participation ='lgc'>--evoke='lgc'>='lgc'>--> harmonic ="trms">relationships and pre="trms">modern mysteries ='lgc'>[implicit in music and ="trms">geometrical forms (even as they are collapsed into ="trms">modern abstraction and the image of a fully administrated ="trms">world)='lgc'>]
='at'>@="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali, KHM sound department

...remnant of what once might have the living Dionysian reality (of the antique chorus)


='strcls'>*score='strcls'>* (coming from the boredom of a third-rate military music band after 1850 in Europe) aligned with the rationalizing imperatives of industrial production='lgc'>: hierarchically ranked states ='strcls'>*executing an external algorithm='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= partition='lgc'>: allocating its parts
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]score='lgc'>: the image of programmed labor in our ="trms">society (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">="frds scrmbld">Lilia) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> logic of combination


="prgrph">-in ="nms">apass i have been fighting against artists ambivalent characterization of themselves. i want my peers particular ="trms">figuration of ="trms">measurement, quantities, and ratios of their diagnosis of crisis of value and of devaluation of life and the ="trms">world (when they perceive as such... negation and inversion)


(="ppl">Aristotle's ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>) Pythagorian='lgc'>: art='lgc'> = harmony='lgc'> = analogy between op="trms">posites
='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**="trms">social project of reconciliation through the use of ="trms">aesthetic forms='strcls'>** (from the 4th century and still popular today)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “training of the people begins with the senses” ='lgc'>: music and rhythm from which came healing of human temperaments and passions

Pythagoranism='lgc'>: number ='lgc'>=/= in="trms">finite
="lsts lst1">•in="trms">finite='lgc'> = void of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, limitless and undetermined
="lsts lst1">•number='lgc'> = rational limit and determination

Pythagorean ='lgc'>=/= pre="trms">modern mystic values
='strcls'>*some of the great disenchanters at the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of ="trms">modern western ="trms">science are deeply Pythagorean='lgc'>:
='strcls'>***number is the essence of reality ='lgc'>==today='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “="trms">nature must be studied quantitatively” (='lgc'>=/= ="nms">ajayeb's quality of descriptive ="trms">nature of the ="trms">world)
...and appeal to mathematics in artmaking still comes from the hope of establishing clear and distinct ideas, which as such are necessarily true

Pythagorean primal ="trms">cosmogenic principle='lgc'>: breath ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> repression's binary rhythm of inhaling and exhaling, the ="trms">mutual ="trms">interaction of contraries (like sex) ='lgc'>: the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal generative force
(the union of the limited and the unlimited) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> still operating today in the year 2018


theories of dynamogeny on ="nms">iranian traditional music radif, that certain musical proportions poses cheerful or bitter qualities, influence the person's emotional state
to transcend from quantitative number of dastgah ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a mysterious qualitative dimension of ="nms">pardeh


(="ppl">="ppl">Crary's) Seurat's anarchism='lgc'>: (painting of the) ="trms">world of mere ="trms">="trms">empirical ="trms">relations, cut off from the in="trms">finite (loss of the vanishing point) and from the light of either sun or moon (gaslight illuminates the s="trms">cene)


="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Leonardo">Leo's primitive ="trms">communism


pictorial generation of meaning


the keystone of ="frds scrmbld">Foad's ="trms">technique='lgc'>:
purity of the spectral element


(Burgin >) fantasy='lgc'>: an arrest that domesticates the unruly movements of desire ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> it takes on hieratic and tableau-like forms ='lgc'>: phantasmatic ="trms">figuration


="large lg22" stl="font-size:120%"> ='strcls'>*reconciliation='strcls'>*
(a formal idea, of) abstract functionings of binary op="trms">positions ='lgc'>{typographical distribution of energy='lgc'>}
='lgc'>=/= elevation in terms of “op="trms">posites” or “contraries” (colors, lines, forces, sexes, numbers)

="trms">technocratic dream of a quantifiable harmony that a machinic ="trms">world installs or restores ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*ataraxie='strcls'>*='lgc'>: emphatically reduction of tensions into zero ='lgc'>--Seurat='lgc'>='lgc'>--> homeostasis ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> preindividuated unity ='lgc'>: theater of equilibrium ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> erasure of both individual and ="trms">historical temporality
(Nattiez='lgc'>:) the illusion that humanity could reach a stable point ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] at which time can be arrested. it is for this reason that androgyny and death so often appear together='lgc'>: ="trms">social utopias end in massacres and that the structura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list utopias of an allembracing explanation of mankind reducible to torrents of binary op="trms">positions result in “nothingness”

="ppl">Freud's nirvana principle='lgc'>: to remove ="trms">interval tension due to stimuli (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> death instinct)

="large lg22" stl="font-size:128%">
="frds">Sina='lgc'>:
(painted and visible philosophy)
in my image assemblages what are and how they work='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">mimes of meaning
="lsts lst1">•full of graphic ="trms">gestation
="lsts lst1">•figural groupings
="lsts lst1">•architecture
="lsts lst1">•com="trms">positional thinking
what ="trms">sorts of structural ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rightness do my image assemblages make inevitable='qstn'>? (innocently indicating the sweet source of truth)
or, what kinds of ="trms">geometric simplicities (purity of form and efficiency of expression) does it betray='qstn'>?
what is the ‘status of idea’ in there='qstn'>?
what are the allegorical abstractions='qstn'>? (in ="ppl">Sohrevardi image='lgc'>: the mediation between heaven and earth) (horizons, vanishing points, grids, orthogonals, heavenward movements, ="trms">gestures, axis or axiomatic ="trms">geometry,,,)
='lgc'>[my performances are teachings on how to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read the figural ="trms">language of my image assemblages (='qstn'>?)='lgc'>]
the particular ="trms">geometry of pictorial structure in my image assemblages testifies to which truth='qstn'>?
which pictorial realizations (knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of things) do they epitomize='qstn'>?
which ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical polarities ="trms">translated into ="trms">geometric contrasts='qstn'>? (="trms">integral part of revealed truth) ='lgc'>[or that there is a or no central truth...='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
which allusions ground the abstract truth of the image in a certain reality='qstn'>?
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--David Rosand's) Raphael='lgc'>: theological truth ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> axiomatic ="trms">geometry (='lgc'>~ congruence of simple structures) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> divinity of the circle
super="trms">natural status of the form, reaffirmed by gold (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- an archaic and discounseled ="trms">technique) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*put ‘form’ beyond the reach of pictorial illusion and beyond the realm of ="trms">nature='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*pictorial truth sometimes lies in the pa="trms">inter's choice in working on the surface='strcls'>* (acknowledging the powerful claims of the axis of the field and the determining control of its shape, recognizing the dialectic of circle and square, the signifying tension between picture plane and orthogonal recession, etc.) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in the case of Raphael='lgc'>: theology becomes a commentary on painting ='lgc'>: pictorial structure (directly ="trms">semiotic and not ="trms">mimetic)='lgc'> = meaning

(always='qstn'>?) ='strcls'>*faithfuls need their o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginals='strcls'>*


in Helmholtz's 1856 comprehensive account of human vision, the eye emerges ='strcls'>*empathically embedded in the thinness and opacity of the body='strcls'>*
eye (='lgc'>=/= a marvelous ="trms">apparatus) ='lgc'>: an ="trms">apparatus with built-in aberrations, proneness to error, and inconsistencies in is processing of visual information ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> entoptical ="trms">phenomenon ='lgc'>--James='lgc'>='lgc'>--> subjective optical sensation='lgc'>: ='thdf'>example of selective attention ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes from consciousness sensations that are ='strcls'>*nonreferential='strcls'>* (= irrelevant to the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge about the ="trms">world)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>~= Ernst Mach's sight phantasms)

arborescent ="trms">vocabulary of the ="trms">scientific ="trms">literature on the eye in the 1880s

='strcls'>*new diagram of the eye='lgc'>: photoreceptors in the human eye are placed at the back of retina, behind the blood vessels (that ="trms">literally ="trms">intervene seeing) ='lgc'>--Seurat='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inseparable mix of an abstract mathematically constructed ='and'>& a physiological perception more subjectivity determined, “domain of vision has been ="trms">integrated Iin the field of desire” (="ppl">Lacan), “phantasmatic events that occur on the surface of the bodies” (="ppl">="ppl">Crary)
='lgc'>=/= older diagram of the eye='lgc'>: the ideal unobstructed functioning of camera obscura ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘s="trms">cene of re="trms">presentation’

‘dream of immediacy’ ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (Seurat's refusal of scenography ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> nondisclosure ='lgc'>~) fantasy of a theatre without re="trms">presentation

="ppl">Rousseau's affirmation of ='strcls'>*political self-sovereignty='strcls'>* in the ‘festival’='lgc'>: a ="trms">stage which ="trms">presents nothing to the sight ='lgc'>--="ppl">Derrida='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a place where the ="trms">spectator, ="trms">presenting himself as ="trms">spectacle, will no longer be seer or voyeur ='strcls'>*** (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- what i learned from Phill) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">presence will be full as the intimacy of a self-="trms">presence, as the sentiment of self-proximity, of self-sameness


="ppl">Lyotard='lgc'>: theatrically ="trms">fold ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a box closed upon itself ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> only those to appear on the ="trms">stage which come from what will be known as the ‘exterior’

='strcls'>*zero='lgc'>: the sign of the empty center, the place where everything is ="trms">supposed to be visible and intelligible ='lgc'>: the place of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> god, organized body, ="trms">society, capital, the ego, platonic forms, etc.

="ppl">Grosz='lgc'>: construction of ="trms">embodied subjectivity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mobius strip (a 19th century invention), inflection of mind and body to one another through a kind of twisting or inversion ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> rethinking ="trms">relations of the inside and the outside of the subject psychical ="trms">interior and corporeal exterior)
="prgrph">-sides of the mobius strip are not fundamental identities, the drift from one to the other side is uncontrollable

currents
and surfaces of this body
is coalescence of energy into phantasms
deceptive semblance
of a theater of re="trms">presentation

="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali's speech (and ="frds scrmbld">Jassem)='lgc'>: تاثیر گذاشتن (making what one knows into an effect on audience)
='lgc'>=/=
="frds">Sina's speech='lgc'>: به صورت موضوع درآوردن
(making what one guesses into a subject of discussion to be rethought)

irreducible com="trms">posite of properties belonging to the observer

perspective='lgc'>: transforming psychophysiological space into mathematical space ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> sum of all parts of space and its contents are absorbed into a single ‘quantum continuum’
="prgrph">-Panofsky perspective as ="trms">symbolic


analysis of sensation
“one coherent mass of sensations”
(Mach's legitimate and functional) ="trms">scientific impressionism

='strcls'>*="trms">modernization (and rationalization) of perceptual (and ="trms">aesthetic) ="trms">response='strcls'>* ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- preoccupation of Seurat, Eisenstein, Moholy-Nagy, Schoenberg


(="ppl">="ppl">Crary > Chastel > Seurat's ="trms">method was) a research into ="trms"nttrm="search">archetypal forms (lines, colors, directions) which answered to a double and deliberately compound ambition, at once ='strcls'>*****archaic regression and ="trms">scientific reduction='strcls'>***** ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- this describe ='mywrk'>my work!='lgc'>] the artist/pa="trms">inter's operations set up a meeting point between ='strcls'>*an ancient hieratic art and the rationalized discipline of the future='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[= ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> culturally reactionary component of my projects, progressive and regressive at once, (="trms">past and future)
='lgc'>=/= Meyer Schapiro's Seurat='lgc'>: an enlightened politically progressive artisan-artist embracing ="trms">science and ="trms">technological paradigms in the ="trms">interests of ='strcls'>*forging an image of a nonhierarchical ="trms">social ="trms">world='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- an uncritical stance towards “="trms">science” and “="trms">technology,” approaching “the rationality of ="trms">method” (in Seurat) as a final locus of meaning ='lgc'>=/= the site of powerful and unresolved contra="trms">dictions='lgc'>]='strcls'>****

="prgrph">-can our ="trms">modern practices be constituted without reinventing its ="trms">relations to the ancient='qstn'>?

troublesome ambivalence of Pythagoreanism='lgc'>: part of an animistic pre="trms">modern magical ="trms">world view yet deeply embedded in the essential ='thdf'>assumption of ="trms">modernity that all of ="trms">nature is understandable in terms of numbers (-Bloch, ="trms">modernism='lgc'>: quantitative side with ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics proper strictly ="trms">scientific ='lgc'>=/= figural-qualitative ="trms">symbolic side)
... ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Seurat's unresolvable problem='lgc'>: to think ="trms">simultaneously ='thdf'>the idea of universality in terms of ="trms">aesthetic absolute and the inescapable universality of ="trms">modern exchange and calculation
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (Norman Brown='lgc'>:) the money complex, archaic or ="trms">modern, is inseparable from ="trms">symbolism, and ='strcls'>*="trms">symbolism is (not the mark of rationality, as ="ppl">Simmel thought, but) the mark of sacred='strcls'>* ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luiza's diagrams ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is important for ="nms">apass, “="trms">aesthetic experience occurs within, not above, the op="trms">position of the ="trms">symbolic and the economy, and within the lived conflict between self-activity and reification” -Brenkman='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> undialectical disjunction of sacred and secular


silent reflective monk

mechanical assemblage of never quite ="trms">integrated elements

Seurat's texture of work ='lgc'><='lgc'>== an intuition of the loss of art's immediacy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> shift of (what might have been) contemplation into mere attentiveness

(="ppl">="ppl">Crary) Seurat concretizes the ='strcls'>*="trms">modern dilemma of the disappearance of aura='strcls'>*
...bringing into the work the forms of rationalization that eradicated aura in the first place ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> appearance is privileged over essence, and ="trms">technological rationality is deployed in the service of appearance

negotiating rapture

(="nms">ajayeb ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/=='qstn'>?) to produce a dialectic image='lgc'>: to criticize ="trms">modernity (='lgc'>~ foregrounding of the aura) through an act of ="trms">memory, and at the same time, to criticize archaism (='lgc'>~ nostalgia for the aura) through an act of essentially ="trms">modern invention (substitution and designification)


color...
how forms of ‘synthesis’ (optical mixture, purely additive and accumulative functions of industrialized procedures) produce ‘qualitative’ change (pre-bourgeois non-quantitative connection to ="trms">nature, for which color did not exist as an autonomous experience or as a separate and specialized ="trms">science)

Seurat='lgc'>: surface fascinations consequences of a disappointment at the impossibility of immediacy and the ="trms">historical inaccessibility of the dream of the ritual/magical practice of art ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Seurat's work's exhaustive denial of ="trms">presence ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (another kind of immediacy='lgc'>:) the ='strcls'>***fusing of image and eye='strcls'>*** ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Foad
='lgc'>=/= art as a medium for disclosing essential truths
='lgc'>=/= redemptive optimism

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

a desiring ="trms">system dependent on operations of rebinding and immobilization

the problem of ='strcls'>*con="trms">trapposto='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[and ='strcls'>*chiaroscuro='strcls'>* (contrast of colors)='lgc'>]='lgc'>:
a Renaissance ideal, invoking a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical dualism that found expression in ="trms">rhetorical devices of contrast and antithesis ='lgc'>--sumbsumed='lgc'>='lgc'>--> within the ='strcls'>*larger ideal of op="trms">position='strcls'>*

con="trms">trapposto could be decorative or structural, justified by its vividness, the clarity with which art could bring op="trms">posites into harmony

classical image (of the body) as an expression of a self-determining balance of ="trms">internal forces



“authentic images” seem capable of action, seem to posses dynamis (super="trms">natural power)



="large lg10" stl="font-size:124%"> Universal Ex="trms">position of 1889 ='lgc'>+ ="trms">international congresses of hypnosis='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•rationalizing ideological imperatives (concertized in the actual organization and layout of the Ex="trms">position ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> rooted in the enlightenment's faith in man's limitless potential for mastery of his environment)
="lsts lst1">•hypnosis optimistically as the most effective entry into (previously inaccessible) territories and processes of human psychic life (and hopefully mastering this terrain)
="lsts lst1">•extensive ="trms">presentation of colonial people and lifestyle as objects of ="trms">spectacle in the 1889 Ex="trms">position (simulated villages inhabited by Congolese, Javanese, New Caledonians, Senegalese, and others) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> became contents of an ="trms">imaginary immortal space, contents that were seemingly assimilable into the rationalizing taxonomy of the ex="trms">position's organizational schema ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= ="frds scrmbld">Steven's schema in ="nms">apass='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*both hypnosis (with its profoundly indecipherable trance states) ='and'>& ="trms">material life of colonial people (primitive cultures with their singular forms of exchange, of value and power ="trms">relations) took on an exhibitionary existence at the threshold of their marginalization, assimilation, or disappearance ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the unassimilable in both was) temporally refigured as the survival (or simulation) of an earlier ="trms">stage of development (as a lower, regressive, or ="trms">childlike state of mind or culture) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> radically irreconcilable with dominant forms of western rationalism='lgc'>]

(for western rationality) hypnosis='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•influence without any logical foundation
="lsts lst1">•production of an illusory ="trms">relation to the ="trms">world
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> similar to ="frds scrmbld">Foad's modality of freedom, wakefulness, and ='thdf'>the notion of the intoxicated masses='lgc'>: loss of mastery, of ability to make decisions and reflect ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the assertion that “hypnotic experience is formless” (='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Nancy)
='strcls'>*="trms">spectacle domination over passivity='strcls'>*
="frds scrmbld">Foad='lgc'>: inner or subjective reality of a psychic state which could in fact involve residence and evasion of external ="trms">authority='lgc'>]
='lgc'>=/= state of trance (as in other cultures) whether individual or collective conceived as an opening up or sharing

the 19th century exhibitions were part of a ="trms">world in which people were beginning to live as tourists or ="trms">anthropologists, addressing an object-="trms">world as the endless re="trms">presentation of some further meaning or reality
='lgc'>==="ppl">="ppl">Crary='lgc'>='lgc'>==> reality='lgc'>: that which ="trms">presents itself as an exhibit before an observer

(Seurat's Parade de Cirque='lgc'>: ...a ="trms">figuration of ="trms">social territory where) ="trms">techniques of fascination and attraction, of appearance and semblance, have the capacity to overpower an observer or audience

(شهر بازی fairground kinesthetic experiences,  such as='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*merry-go-round='strcls'>*='lgc'>: a fragmentary and mechanical recuperation of carnival energies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> controlled circumstances inciting of dynamogenic bodily sensation
&
cinema later would radically displace survivals of pre="trms">modern forms like the circus ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> look at Hollywood today 2018='lgc'>]

="trms">different modes of regression and fantasy

='strcls'>***late 19th century shift from “viewing machine” to “vertigo machine”

19th century's ="trms">inter="trms">relations between='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•photography
="lsts lst1">•hypnosis (both medically and mythically)
="lsts lst1">•cinema
="lsts lst1">•psychoanalysis
='strcls'>*strong ="trms">epistemological con="trms">figurations='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a new place of subject (in western culture) linked to formation of certain images of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•time
="lsts lst1">•="trms">past
="lsts lst1">•="trms">memory


(for Brown Sequard) collective effect of acts of inhibition and dynamogeny ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> hypnotism ='lgc'>==(Charles Henry)='lgc'>='lgc'>==> de="trms">monstrating that perception is fundamentally unconscious (consisting of involuntary ="trms">responses to stimuli) ='lgc'>==Seurat='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*indistinction between the automatism of a hypnotized subject and the perceptual experience of a so-called normal subject='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--="frds scrmbld">Foad='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading people in a contemporary ="trms">social ="trms">phenomena of sug="trms">gestion and ="trms">somnambulism (='lgc'>~ sleep-walking):='lgc'>] a bypassing of intellectual process (such as reason and judgement) in an attentive ="trms">spectator
="prgrph">-='lgc'>{my discussion with ="frds scrmbld">Foad was perhaps about the ="trms">question of ="trms">social justice (= sufferings and causes are constant and self-evident, singularized principle of value ='lgc'>[="trms">social injury='lgc'>] located in a particular product ='lgc'>[political processes leading to ="trms">social injustice='lgc'>]) and/against thinking with assemblages (= contextual ="trms">relational uncertain concept of the ="trms">social of things and people as ="trms">system of objects, in which nothing merely rules itself or others, emphasizing heterogeneity and process)... finally saying that ="nms">Tehran is a ="trms">relational heterogeneous uncertain ="trms">system ='lgc'>[="frds">Sina='lgc'>] and not a destined coerced programmed doom-object ='lgc'>[="frds scrmbld">Foad='lgc'>]. ="trms">question='lgc'>: can we oppose the ideas of suffering and injustice and their expressions as essential qualities in the context of ="nms">Tehran='qstn'>? what conceptual hybrids or precarious collectives are ethically available or necessary to think with='qstn'>? can injustice and suffering as target of analysis be investigated not as concrete evident necessities ='lgc'>[stable essences, as something to defend or fight against='lgc'>] but as distributed changing and changeable always in process, in the contemporary ="nms">Tehran (specially if you are the one who is suffering)='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-my family dining table='lgc'>: space of arrangement of practices of objects of...
="prgrph">-this discussion for me was about the ="trms">categories and classifications that we rely on to investigate the ="trms">world.='lgc'>}

='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Bergson='lgc'>: “in the processes of art we shall find, in a weakened form, a refined and in some ="trms">measures spiritualized version of the processes commonly used to induce the state of hypnosis ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] an effect of the same kind by the fixity which they suddenly impose upon life, and which a physical contagion carries over to the attention of the ="trms">spectator.”


1880s and 1890s is exactly the time where many ="trms">different discourses considered the ways in which external forces and procedures could influence or control both individual and collective subject
="prgrph">-common in French ="trms">sociological thinkers (Durkheim, Tarde, Le Bon)='lgc'>: the primal fact of ="trms">social life is some ="trms">system of control or coercion that is imposed on the individual ='lgc'>{for example Tarde='lgc'>: “stupefied and feverish beings ='lgc'>[in='lgc'>] magical charm of their environment ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] it is always more fatiguing to think for oneself ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] man lives in an animated environment ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] he gradually refrains from all intellectual efforts ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] his mind becomes stultified and more and more ex="trms">cited ='lgc'>[= ="trms">somnambu="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic='lgc'>] characteristic of many city dwellers ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]"='lgc'>}

the audience in many artworks still today has the sign of the distracted crowd (جمعیت خواب)

(“man without qualities” =) de-individualized='lgc'> = sug="trms">gestible, hypnotizable

(Fried='lgc'>:)
anti-rococo French painting='lgc'>: a painting had to first attract (call to someone) and then to arrest (bring him to a halt in front of itself) and finally to enthral (hold him there as if spellbound)='lgc'> = the ="trms">modernizing ="trms">instrumentality that is fulfilled in cinema today

for Tarde='lgc'>:
“="trms">social existence='lgc'> = ="trms">somnambulism"='lgc'>[= heightened receptivity to sug="trms">gestion, individuals apt to imitate one another='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “="trms">social='lgc'> = (a form of) dream”
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> hypnotic aspect of the life of crowds
="lsts lst1">•“="trms">intercerebration”='lgc'>: one brain fascinates the other
="lsts lst1">•“="trms">fashion's sug="trms">gestibility”='lgc'>: half-conscious observation and mere physical proximity produce a functional ="trms">social homogeneity
="lsts lst1">•“fascination”='lgc'>: a genuine ="trms">neurosis, a kind of polarization of ="trms">love and faith  ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> effects of obedience and imitation
="lsts lst1">•“attention”='lgc'>: transformation of sensation by effort and desire ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the desire for an increase in personal believe
="lsts lst1">•“plateau”='lgc'>: a flexible figure for ="trms">natural, ="trms">social, and statistical processes and events (in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding desire) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Deleuze and ="ppl">Guattari's plateau='lgc'>]

Le Bon='lgc'>:
“="trms">social='lgc'> = a particular modality of perception,” as a ="trms">specific ="trms">social arrangement that conditions the limits of perceptual experience
(="trms">modern) crowd='lgc'>: a viewing machine capable of generating “collective ="trms">hallucinations,” a place for ="trms">consumption of illusion, (with a “psychological unity” that occupies spatially remote locations,)
="lsts lst1">•“observation”='lgc'>: a cognitive model predicated on workable notion of objective reality (a classical ="trms">epistemological model) that begins to corrode within a field saturated by illusion, ="trms">hallucination, and whole industries of simulation
="prgrph">-individual subsumed in crowd is incapable of observation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">modern ="trms">spectacular culture (to be ="trms">articulated 7 decades later by ="ppl">Guy ="ppl">Debord

="large lg10" stl="font-size:132%"> the crowd (in Le Bon) is a ="trms">generalized site on which the accumulated d="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read and hope as="trms">sociated in the 19th century with ="trms">social insurrection collapse into am abstract countless mass ="trms">onto which dream ="trms">imaginary of any ="trms">sort can be projected
="prgrph">-="ppl">="ppl">Crary

19th century ‘crowd psychology’ ='thdf'>assumption that attention has no necessary connection to objective optical observation of the ="trms">world ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*crowd='lgc'>: drift toward a more primitive order of consciousness='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-withdrawal from surroundings and refocusing on some real or ="trms">symbolic figure
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theatrical con="trms">figuration='lgc'>: means for controlling crowds ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (La Bon's) image of theater exceeding its older place within models of ="trms">mimetic ="trms">relation ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> new effects of subjectification


Wagner's volkish homogeneity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> uniform modes of perception and ="trms">response ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (problem of) ="trms">community formation

Wagner's optical ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor (="trms">community could see itself reflected in the mirror of tragedy) of theatrical existence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*sense of vision serves to reinforce one's place within the ="trms">social whole='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when i look at Brussels from the 14th floor...='lgc'>]

Wagner's cultural program for ="trms">social re="trms">integration and his belief in the transformative effects of the collective experience of music drama preformed and produced as a ritual ="trms">communal event

(typical 19th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> debates about the effects of mass culture ='lgc'>--="trms">articulated='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “distraction ='lgc'>=/= self-conscious contemplative perception” ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) Wagner's deploying the ="trms">pervasiveness of ='strcls'>*distracted modes of cultural ="trms">consumption='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “higher (deeply attentive ='lgc'>--advocated='lgc'>='lgc'>--> purified and ethically superior perceptual engagement) ='lgc'>=/= lower (distracted)” forms of ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening
="prgrph">-his dissatisfaction with traditional theatre that had allowed or encouraged audiences to look at each other at the diverse ="trms">social texture of the theatre

an attentive, absorbed public (unthinkable in the 18th century ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Sennett)

(still we are suffering ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ='lgc'>[to have='lgc'>] ='strcls'>*control over the attentiveness of an audience='strcls'>* to subordinate it to the will of the artist ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> generate a ='strcls'>*collective state of reception='strcls'>* (worthy of an art with such ="trms">social aspiration ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda, ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali , ="frds">Sina, ='lgc'>--to which extent my mysticism in art was about my ideas about ="trms">spectators incapacity for attention in contemporary ="nms">Tehran='qstn'>?)

19th century theatre ='lgc'>--(transform into)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***construction of visibility='strcls'>*** (structure the ="trms">spectators perceptual experience)

“collective act of seeing ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> semblance of a ="trms">community”

="large lg26" stl="font-size:132%"> (phantasmagoric character of his work) Wagner='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•eliminating lateral views ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> frontal engagement
="lsts lst1">•near-complete darkness ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> preventing peripheral distraction
="lsts lst1">•lowering the orchestra out of sight
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">systematic concealing and mystification of the process of production
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (Wagner stands for) will to mastery over all aspects of the ="trms">spectacle ='lgc'>==allow='lgc'>='lgc'>==> calculated production of states of regression, fascination, dream (="trms">synchronized sound ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cinema's attentiveness half a century later)
="prgrph">-control over emotional ="trms">response
="prgrph">-remaking of ="trms">spectator experience
="prgrph">-production of dreamlike clairvoyant

(-can theater ="trms">stage be a place of distraction='qstn'>? again)

intelligible ="trms">relation of distance between viewer and illusory s="trms">cene
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the way diorama commanded visual attention

in my ="trms">stage design drawings from 2009='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•standardized perspectival expectations
="lsts lst1">•metric ="trms">relations
="lsts lst1">•="trms">position of ="trms">spectator
="lsts lst1">•luminous detached rectangle
="prgrph">- 

Wagner's Ring cycle='lgc'>: the last expression of a 19th century fantasy of the recuperation of tragedy and myth ='lgc'>~ the dream that culture could make whole what capitalism has broken ='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Crary='lgc'>+="ppl">Lacoue-Labarthe='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[disturbing conviction/dream:='lgc'>] in an age where transcendence is undone, (the vacations of) art can recover an ancient destination and establish the type of mythological figure (in which humanity or a people could recognize itself)


="prgrph">-verisimilitude='lgc'>: the quality of seeming to be true, gloss, semblance


com="trms">posite ="trms">imaginary of the 19th century

______________


crowd
theater
phantasmagoria

="ppl">="ppl">Crary ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Seurat's Parade de Cirque='lgc'> = disclosure of ='strcls'>*the absence at the heart o[...]