[...]eries

(="ppl">="ppl">Crary shows='lgc'>:) demise of the punctual or anchored classical observer begins in the early 19th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a new unstable attentive subject (with a ='strcls'>*vision refigured as dynamic, temporal, com="trms">posite='strcls'>*) ='lgc'>==> ="trms">consumer/="trms">agent of/in synthesis of a proliferating diversity of reality-effects (='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> digital and cybernetic imperatives of our ="trms">present time)


="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> invention
dissolution
creative synthesis

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

antimony='lgc'>: contra="trms">diction between two equally reasonable statements

the antinomic character (of my conceptual schema='lgc'>: ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigidity and banality, attention and dis="trms">integration,,, ='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*an object outside its logical control='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-charged with antagonistic forces, like Seurat, my ="trms">lectures (since now 2018) negate a possibility of an attentive closure, even as it fervently attempts to generate its own ="trms">internal ="trms">formula for perceptual ="trms">presence and unity. like Seurat's Parade de Cirque, it operates in a ceaseless play of disclosure and concealment. ='lgc'>[is it time to change='qstn'>?='lgc'>])

Seurat preoccupation with non="trms">specific temporalities

(estrangement from) a dream of instinctual wholeness

harmonious sensory utopia

="prgrph">-my ="trms">lecture-performances constitute a provisional realm of freedom for an individual observer ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~ myself='lgc'>: a psychic, ="trms">social, ="trms">imaginary ="trms">position called being an ="nms">Iranian='lgc'>--='lgc'>] of a prismatic ="trms">past, coinciding with a proliferation of discourse ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= shifting p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of ‘centers'='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dream of subjective freedom ='lgc'>+ effects of power

perhaps ='mywrk'>my work is inseparable from (the consequences of the emergence of) ='strcls'>*models of subjective vision='strcls'>*

="prgrph">-use of optical mixture in ='mywrk'>my work.
how important is the retina (for any artist)='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->(the ="trms">question of) the seeing body in all of its physiological ="trms">density ='lgc'>+ ambiguous ="trms">position of that body within conceptions of visuality
="lsts lst1">•chromatic or luminous effects on the body

physiological regime of visuality (beginning with Thomas Young and ="ppl">Goethe, developed by Johannes Müller, Helmholtz and others) ='lgc'>=/= renaissance-based pictorial order


collapse of ='strcls'>*camera obscura='strcls'>* model of vision ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> emergence of ='strcls'>*psychological optics='strcls'>*


1890s
construction of various nonreferential models of perception
='lgc'>+
="trms">pragmatic functions of an observing subject

='lgc'>='lgc'>--> status of vision and mind
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature and value of sensation
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">presentation of ="trms">social facts


central to many developments in the visual culture in the West in late 19th century='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*="trms">questions of perceptual and cognitive synthesis='strcls'>*


="trms">Gestalt theory ='lgc'>==> essential primacy and ethical value of the ‘whole’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> an observer who perceives organized structures, who is marked by innate form-giving and form-apprehending capacities ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an effort to endow human perception with an inherent meaningfulness, coherence, and even orderliness (amid its perceptual decom="trms">position within 20th century ="trms">spectacular culture) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>[preparing for the perceptual logic of high capitalism:='lgc'>] it was not the attentive subject who identified form from a larger background, but rather the reverse, that “good” form had the capacity to produce attentiveness in a subject
(="trms">Gestalt theory was a dream of='lgc'>:)
the reciprocal affirmation of the unity of the individual subject ='and'>& the unified object of perception
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bisect visual filed into='lgc'>: significant “figure” and insignificant “background"='lgc'>]


impression ادراک/برداشت ='lgc'>=/= inference استنباط/استنتاج
(="ppl">Peirce='lgc'>:) color is not an impression, but an inference


(the last kind of) “="trms">natural” sign available to a visual artist


Seurat (like many others around that time) was testing the limits and possibilities of an observer attentive to a heterogeneity and ="trms">simultaneity of sensory ="trms">data
='lgc'>[="trms">specifically:='lgc'>] how an irreducible p="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurality of luminous information could be organized and perceived coherently ... rearranged and made exchangeable


='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Laura='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*designated bodies='strcls'>* (are never permanent='lgc'>[!!='qstn'>?='lgc'>])
="prgrph">-is she actually busy with destiny and destined bodies='qstn'>? (for ="frds scrmbld">Laura='lgc'>:) design='lgc'> = destiny
="prgrph">-is she going to redesignate='qstn'>? how can she not='qstn'>? if she believes that the designated bodies are al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready on a fixed destiny or destination
='lgc'>[designate='lgc'>: appointed or made clear which place or direction spatially or ="trms">figuratively. related to ='strcls'>*design ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> destine='strcls'>*='lgc'>]


early 1890s
the time when western ="trms">science accepts the notion “that there might be several ways to re="trms">present the same fact” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> elephant parable ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">situated knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges='lgc'>]

1850s and 1860s
construction of models of the reflex functioning of the human nervous ="trms">system ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature of human ="trms">response to external stimulation


="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%"> dynamogenesis (='lgc'>~ every state of consciousness tends to realize itself in an appropriate muscular movement)
vision reformed in 19th century='lgc'>: nonoptical modal of attentive subject, not the one who sees, rather, the subject is the one who is susceptible to psychomotor induction
(what was once figured as visual re="trms">presentation are now) the abstract and quantified reactions of the body as a com="trms">posite set of physical ="trms">systems
='lgc'>--Fere='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">instrumental relocation of vision (from a dis="trms">embodied and punctual ="trms">system of images) to an ="trms">interplay of forces and motor reactions (in which re="trms">presentation is irrelevant)
='lgc'>[this is inseparable from the larger project of ="trms">scientific amelioration of collective emotional hygiene of the 19th century='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*sensation='lgc'>: part of a sequence of events (in which the end point is not an inner state, such as='lgc'>: knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, cognition, perception, rather='lgc'>:) it is that which culminates in movement

some of the 1850s rationalizing ambitions (of widesp="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read philosophical and ="trms">scientific conceptualization of a fundamental ="trms">relation between sensation and motor behaviour) indirectly informs Seurat's work ='lgc'>--proposing='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ sensory stimuli ='lgc'>==> motor expression (in the perceiver) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the ="trms">question of) ='strcls'>**human ="trms">response based on bypassing of conscious thought altogether='strcls'>**

(very important for ="nms">iranian artists='lgc'>: the ="trms">question of the ='strcls'>*rational mind of an observer='strcls'>* and intellectual construction directed to that ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> status of a conscious observer)
="prgrph">-producing effects involuntary in the observer
="prgrph">-(="frds scrmbld">Foad and ="frds">Sina engaging with an) ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusively optical consciousness of the individual human subject ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> can we go beyond that='qstn'>? to which philosophical ="trms">sensual ethics of bodily awareness ="frds scrmbld">Foad and ="frds">Sina are optically bind to='qstn'>? which anti-optical ="trms">aesthetic ="trms">positions are available to us='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•="frds scrmbld">Foad's neoimpressionist='lgc'>: implication of total organic resonance ='lgc'>==>='lgc'>{ from organic activity of perception ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> transforming physical existence ='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•="frds">Sina's Einfuhlung='lgc'>: mode of intense perceptual absorption in which lines and forms are experienced as catalysts for vitalization of the ="trms">imagination


="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%"> Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dream of a fully unalienated instinctual ="trms">aesthetic gratification ='lgc'>--through='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quantifiable and manageable economy of ex="trms">citation (within an organized and controllable body)

biological romanticism

="trms">anxiety of overstimulation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> power of sug="trms">gestion


attention ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Nietzsche's reality of drives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Freud's libidinal body (='lgc'>=/= physiological body) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*drives (='lgc'>=/= instincts) not tied to ="trms">specific conditions of satisfaction, are subsumed to an open-ended ‘plasticity’ (susceptible to substitution)
drive constantly misses its aim

="large lg5" stl="font-size:134%">
(for Seurat, Fere, ="ppl">Nietzsche='lgc'>:)
art='lgc'> = physics (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">semiology) ='lgc'>: the ="trms">question of meaning in art was not about re="trms">presentation but a ="trms">relation of forces ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for Seurat color was not something accessible as a sign to a sovereign gaze but was an ="trms">interpretation made by the body

(both Seurat ='lgc'>[in his painting='lgc'>] and ="ppl">Nietzsche ='lgc'>[in will to power='lgc'>] have felt that there was) an extreme calm in certain ='strcls'>*sensations of rapture='strcls'>* ='lgc'>~ extra retardation of the feeling of time and space ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the classical style is essentially a re="trms">presentation of this calm, simplification, abbreviation, concentration ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (='qstn'>?="frds">Sina's paintings) logical and ="trms">geometrical simplification ='lgc'><== enhancement of strength='strcls'>*!


a lot of artists are still busy with='lgc'>:
stimulus-="trms">response mechanisms
='strcls'>**="trms">techniques for the external management of ="trms">aesthetic ="trms">response='strcls'>** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quantifiable emotional engineering
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eszter directly
(the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of this discourse lies in 19th century automatic behaviour and nervous ="trms">response, ="trms">nature of mass subjectivity and desire for ="trms">social ="trms">integration, and since Seurat in visual art)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">spectator='lgc'>: a being t[...]