[...]and visible philosophy)
in my image assemblages what are and how they work='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">mimes of meaning
="lsts lst1">•full of graphic ="trms">gestation
="lsts lst1">•figural groupings
="lsts lst1">•architecture
="lsts lst1">•com="trms">positional thinking
what ="trms">sorts of structural ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rightness do my image assemblages make inevitable='qstn'>? (innocently indicating the sweet source of truth)
or, what kinds of ="trms">geometric simplicities (purity of form and efficiency of expression) does it betray='qstn'>?
what is the ‘status of idea’ in there='qstn'>?
what are the allegorical abstractions='qstn'>? (in ="ppl">Sohrevardi image='lgc'>: the mediation between heaven and earth) (horizons, vanishing points, grids, orthogonals, heavenward movements, ="trms">gestures, axis or axiomatic ="trms">geometry,,,)
='lgc'>[my performances are teachings on how to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read the figural ="trms">language of my image assemblages (='qstn'>?)='lgc'>]
the particular ="trms">geometry of pictorial structure in my image assemblages testifies to which truth='qstn'>?
which pictorial realizations (knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of things) do they epitomize='qstn'>?
which ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical polarities ="trms">translated into ="trms">geometric contrasts='qstn'>? (="trms">integral part of revealed truth) ='lgc'>[or that there is a or no central truth...='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
which allusions ground the abstract truth of the image in a certain reality='qstn'>?
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--David Rosand's) Raphael='lgc'>: theological truth ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> axiomatic ="trms">geometry (='lgc'>~ congruence of simple structures) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> divinity of the circle
super="trms">natural status of the form, reaffirmed by gold (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- an archaic and discounseled ="trms">technique) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*put ‘form’ beyond the reach of pictorial illusion and beyond the realm of ="trms">nature='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*pictorial truth sometimes lies in the pa="trms">inter's choice in working on the surface='strcls'>* (acknowledging the powerful claims of the axis of the field and the determining control of its shape, recognizing the dialectic of circle and square, the signifying tension between picture plane and orthogonal recession, etc.) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in the case of Raphael='lgc'>: theology becomes a commentary on painting ='lgc'>: pictorial structure (directly ="trms">semiotic and not ="trms">mimetic)='lgc'> = meaning

(always='qstn'>?) ='strcls'>*faithfuls need their o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginals='strcls'>*


in Helmholtz's 1856 comprehensive account of human vision, the eye emerges ='strcls'>*empathically embedded in the thinness and opacity of the body='strcls'>*
eye (='lgc'>=/= a marvelous ="trms">apparatus) ='lgc'>: an ="trms">apparatus with built-in aberrations, proneness to error, and inconsistencies in is processing of visual information ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> entoptical ="trms">phenomenon ='lgc'>--James='lgc'>='lgc'>--> subjective optical sensation='lgc'>: ='thdf'>example of selective attention ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes from consciousness sensations that are ='strcls'>*nonreferential='strcls'>* (= irrelevant to the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge about the ="trms">world)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>~= Ernst Mach's sight phantasms)

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> arborescent ="trms">vocabulary of the ="trms">scientific ="trms">literature on the eye in the 1880s

='strcls'>*new diagram of the eye='lgc'>: photoreceptors in the human eye are placed at the back of retina, behind the blood vessels (that ="trms">literally ="trms">intervene seeing) ='lgc'>--Seurat='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inseparable mix of an abstract mathematically constructed ='and'>& a physiological perception more subjectivity determined, “domain of vision has been ="trms">integrated Iin the field of desire” (="ppl">Lacan), “phantasmatic events that occur on the surface of the bodies” (="ppl">="ppl">Crary)
='lgc'>=/= older diagram of the eye='lgc'>: the ideal unobstructed functioning of camera obscura ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘s="trms">cene of re="trms">presentation’

‘dream of immediacy’ ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (Seurat's refusal of scenography ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> nondisclosure ='lgc'>~) fantasy of a theatre without re="trms">presentation

="ppl">Rousseau's affirmation of ='strcls'>*political self-sovereignty='strcls'>* in the ‘festival’='lgc'>: a ="trms">stage which ="trms">presents nothing to the sight ='lgc'>--="ppl">Derrida='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a place where the ="trms">spectator, ="trms">presenting himself as ="trms">spectacle, will no longer be seer or voyeur ='strcls'>*** (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- what i learned from Phill) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">presence will be full as the intimacy of a self-="trms">presence, as the sentiment of self-proximity, of self-sameness


="ppl">Lyotard='lgc'>: theatrically ="trms">fold ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a box closed upon itself ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> only those to appear on the ="trms">stage which come from what will be known as the ‘exterior’

='strcls'>*zero='lgc'>: the sign of the empty center, the place where everything is ="trms">supposed to be visible and intelligible ='lgc'>: the place of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> god, organized body, ="trms">society, capital, the ego, platonic forms, etc.

="ppl">Grosz='lgc'>: construction of ="trms">embodied subjectivity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mobius strip (a 19th century invention), inflection of mind and body to one another through a kind of twisting or inversion ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> rethinking ="trms">relations of the inside and the outside of the subject psychical ="trms">interior and corporeal exterior)
="prgrph">-sides of the mobius strip are not fundamental identities, the drift from one to the other side is uncontrollable

currents
and surfaces of this body
is coalescence of energy into phantasms
deceptive semblance
of a theater of re="trms">presentation

="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali's speech (and ="frds scrmbld">Jassem)='lgc'>: تاثیر گذاشتن (making what one knows into an effect on audience)
='lgc'>=/=
="frds">Sina's speech='lgc'>: به صورت موضوع درآوردن
(making what one guesses into a subject of discussion to be rethought)

irreducible com="trms">posite of properties belonging to the observer

perspective='lgc'>: transforming psychophysiological space into mathematical space ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> sum of all parts of space and its contents are absorbed into a single ‘quantum continuum’
="prgrph">-Panofsky perspective as ="trms">symbolic

="large lg6" stl="font-size:101%">
analysis of sensation
“one coherent mass of sensations”
(Mach's legitimate and functional) ="trms">scientific impressionism

='strcls'>*="trms">modernization (and rationalization) of perceptual (and ="trms">aesthetic) ="trms">response='strcls'>* ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- preoccupation of Seurat, Eisenstein, Moholy-Nagy, Schoenberg


(="ppl">="ppl">Crary > Chastel > Seurat's ="trms">method was) a research into ="trms"nttrm="search">archetypal forms (lines, colors, directions) which answered to a double and deliberately compound ambition, at once ='strcls'>*****archaic regression and ="trms">scientific reduction='strcls'>***** ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- this describe ='mywrk'>my work!='lgc'>] the artist/pa="trms">inter's operations set up a meeting point between ='strcls'>*an ancient hieratic art and the rationalized discipline of the future='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[= ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> culturally reactionary component of my projects, progressive and regressive at once, (="trms">past and future)
='lgc'>=/= Meyer Schapiro's Seurat='lgc'>: an enlightened politically progressive artisan-artist embracing ="trms">science and ="trms">technological paradigms in the ="trms">interests of ='strcls'>*forging an image of a nonhierarchical ="trms">social ="trms">world='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- an uncritical stance towards “="trms">science” and “="trms">technology,” approaching “the rationality of ="trms">method” (in Seurat) as a final locus of meaning ='lgc'>=/= the site of powerful and unresolved contra="trms">dictions='lgc'>]='strcls'>****

="prgrph">-can our ="trms">modern practices be constituted without reinventing its ="trms">relations to the ancient='qstn'>?

troublesome ambivalence of Pythagoreanism='lgc'>: part of an animistic pre="trms">modern magical ="trms">world view yet deeply embedded in the essential ='thdf'>assumption of ="trms">modernity that all of ="trms">nature is understandable in terms of numbers (-Bloch, ="trms">modernism='lgc'>: quantitative side with ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics proper strictly ="trms">scientific ='lgc'>=/= figural-qualitative ="trms">symbolic side)
... ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Seurat's unresolvable problem='lgc'>: to think ="trms">simultaneously ='thdf'>the idea of universality in terms of ="trms">aesthetic absolute and the inescapable universality of ="trms">modern exchange and calculation
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (Norman Brown='lgc'>:) the money complex, archaic or ="trms">modern, is inseparable from ="trms">symbolism, and ='strcls'>*="trms">symbolism is (not the mark of rationality, as ="ppl">Simmel thought, but) the mark of sacred='strcls'>* ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luiza's diagrams ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is important for ="nms">apass, “="trms">aesthetic experience occurs within, not above, the op="trms">position of the ="trms">symbolic and the economy, and within the lived conflict between self-activity and reification” -Brenkman='lgc'>]
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> undialectical disjunction of sacred and secular


silent reflective monk

mechanical assemblage of never quite ="trms">integrated elements

Seurat's texture of work ='lgc'><='lgc'>== an intuition of the loss of art's immediacy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> shift of (what might have been) contemplation into mere attentiveness

(="ppl">="ppl">Crary) Seurat concretizes the ='strcls'>*="trms">modern dilemma of the disappearance of aura='strcls'>*
...bringing into the work the forms of rationalization that eradicated aura in the first place ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> appearance is privileged over essence, and ="trms">technological rationality is deployed in the service of appearance

negotiating rapture

(="nms">ajayeb ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/=='qstn'>?) to produce a dialectic image='lgc'>: to criticize ="trms">modernity (='lgc'>~ foregrounding of the aura) through an act of ="trms">memory, and at the same time, to criticize archaism (='lgc'>~ nostalgia for the aura) through an act of essentially ="trms">modern invention (substitution and designification)


color...
how forms of ‘synthesis’ (optical mixture, purely additive and accumulative functions of industrialized procedures) produce ‘qualitative’ change (pre-bourgeois non-quantitative connection to ="trms">nature, for which color did not exist as an autonomous experience or as a separate and specialized ="trms">science)

Seurat='lgc'>: surface fascinations consequences of a disappointment at the impossibility of immediacy and the ="trms">historical inaccessibility of the dream of the ritual/magical practice of art ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Seurat's work's exhaustive denial of ="trms">presence ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (another kind of immediacy='lgc'>:) the ='strcls'>***fusing of image and eye='strcls'>*** ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Foad
='lgc'>=/= art as a medium for disclosing essential truths
='lgc'>=/= redemptive optimism

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

a desiring ="trms">system dependent on operations of rebinding and immobilization

the problem of ='strcls'>*con="trms">trapposto='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[and ='strcls'>*chiaroscuro='strcls'>* (contrast of colors)='lgc'>]='lgc'>:
a Renaissance ideal, invoking a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical dualism that found expression in ="trms">rhetorical devices of contrast and antithesis ='lgc'>--sumbsumed='lgc'>='lgc'>--> within the ='strcls'>*larger ideal of op="trms">position='strcls'>*

con="trms">trapposto could be decorative or structural, justified by its vividness, the clarity with which art could bring op="trms">posites into harmony

classical image (of the body) as an expression of a self-determining balance of ="trms">internal forces



“authentic images” seem capable of action, seem to posses dynamis (super="trms">natural power)



Universal Ex="trms">position of 1889 ='lgc'>+ ="trms">international congresses of hypnosis='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•rationalizing ideological imperatives (concertized in the actual organization and layout of the Ex="trms">position ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> rooted in the enlightenment's faith in man's limitless potential for mastery of his environment)
="lsts lst1">•hypnosis optimistically as the most effective entry into (previously inaccessible) territories and processes of human psychic life (and hopefully mastering this terrain)
="lsts lst1">•extensive ="trms">presentation of colonial people and lifestyle as objects of ="trms">spectacle in the 1889 Ex="trms">position (simulated villages inhabited by Congolese, Javanese, New Caledonians, Senegalese, and others) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> became contents of an ="trms">imaginary immortal space, contents that were seemingly assimilable into the rationalizing taxonomy of the ex="trms">position's organizational schema ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= ="frds scrmbld">Steven's schema in ="nms">apass='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*both hypnosis (with its profoundly indecipherable trance states) ='and'>& ="trms">material life of colonial people (primitive cultures with their singular forms of exchange, of value and power ="trms">relations) took on an exhibitionary existence at the threshold of their marginalization, assimilation, or disappearance ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the unassimilable in both was) temporally refigured as the survival (or simulation) of an earlier ="trms">stage of development (as a lower, regressive, or ="trms">childlike state of mind or culture) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> radically irreconcilable with dominant forms of western rationalism='lgc'>]

(for western rationality) hypnosis='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•influence without any logical foundation
="lsts lst1">•production of an illusory ="trms">relation to the ="trms">world
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> similar to ="frds scrmbld">Foad's modality of freedom, wakefulness, and ='thdf'>the notion of the intoxicated masses='lgc'>: loss of mastery, of ability to make decisions and reflect ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the assertion that “hypnotic experience is formless” (='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Nancy)
='strcls'>*="trms">spectacle domination over passivity='strcls'>*
="frds scrmbld">Foad='lgc'>: inner or subjective reality of a psychic state which could in fact involve residence and evasion of external ="trms">authority='lgc'>]
='lgc'>=/= state of trance (as in other cultures) whether individual or collective conceived as an opening up or sharing

the 19th century exhibitions were part of a ="trms">world in which people were beginning to live as tourists or ="trms">anthropologists, addressing an object-="trms">world as the endless re="trms">presentation of some further meaning or reality
='lgc'>==="ppl">="ppl">Crary='lgc'>='lgc'>==> reality='lgc'>: that which ="trms">presents itself as an exhibit before an observer

(Seurat's Parade de Cirque='lgc'>: ...a ="trms">figuration of ="trms">social territory where) ="trms">techniques of fascination and attraction, of appearance and semblance, have the capacity to overpower an observer or audience

(شهر بازی fairground kinesthetic experiences,  such as='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*merry-go-round='strcls'>*='lgc'>: a fragmentary and mechanical recuperation of carnival energies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> controlled circumstances inciting of dynamogenic bodily sensation
&
cinema later would radically displace survivals of pre="trms">modern forms like the circus ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> look at Hollywood today 2018='lgc'>]

="trms">different modes of regression and fantasy

="large lg10" stl="font-size:103%"> ='strcls'>***late 19th century shift from “viewing machine” to “vertigo machine”

19th century's ="trms">inter="trms">relations between='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•photography
="lsts lst1">•hypnosis (both medically and mythically)
="lsts lst1">•cinema
="lsts lst1">•psychoanalysis
='strcls'>*strong ="trms">epistemological con="trms">figurations='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a new place of subject (in western culture) linked to formation of certain images of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•time
="lsts lst1">•="trms">past
="lsts lst1">•="trms">memory


(for Brown Sequard) collective effect of acts of inhibition and dynamogeny ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> hypnotism ='lgc'>==(Charles Henry)='lgc'>='lgc'>==> de="trms">monstrating that perception is fundamentally unconscious (consisting of involuntary ="trms">responses to stimuli) ='lgc'>==Seurat='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*indistinction between the automatism of a hypnotized subject and the perceptual experience of a so-called normal subject='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--="frds scrmbld">Foad='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading people in a contemporary ="trms">social ="trms">phenomena of sug="trms">gestion and ="trms">somnambulism (='lgc'>~ sleep-walking):='lgc'>] a bypassing of intellectual process (such as reason and judgement) in an attentive ="trms">spectator
="prgrph">-='lgc'>{my discussion with ="frds scrmbld">Foad was perhaps about the ="trms">question of ="trms">social justice (= sufferings and causes are constant and self-evident, singularized principle of value ='lgc'>[="trms">social injury='lgc'>] located in a particular product ='lgc'>[political processes leading to ="trms">social injustice='lgc'>]) and/against thinking with assemblages (= contextual ="trms">relational uncertain concept of the ="trms">social of things and people as ="trms">system of objects, in which nothing merely rules itself or others, emphasizing heterogeneity and process)... finally saying that ="nms">Tehran is a ="trms">relational heterogeneous uncertain ="trms">system ='lgc'>[="frds">Sina='lgc'>] and not a destined coerced programmed doom-object ='lgc'>[="frds scrmbld">Foad='lgc'>]. ="trms">question='lgc'>: can we oppose the ideas of suffering and injustice and their expressions as essential qualities in the context of ="nms">Tehran='qstn'>? what conceptual hybrids or precarious collectives are ethically available or necessary to think with='qstn'>? can injustice and suffering as target of analysis be investigated not as concrete evident necessities ='lgc'>[stable essences, as something to defend or fight against='lgc'>] but as distributed changing and changeable always in process, in the contemporary ="nms">Tehran (specially if you are the one who is suffering)='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-my family dining table='lgc'>: space of arrangement of practices of objects of...
="prgrph">-this discussion for me was about the ="trms">categories and classifications that we rely on to investigate the ="trms">world.='lgc'>}

="large lg1" stl="font-size:141%"> ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Bergson='lgc'>: “in the processes of art we shall find, in a weakened form, a refined and in some ="trms">measures spiritualized version of the processes commonly used to induce the state of hypnosis ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] an effect of the same kind by the fixity which they suddenly impose upon life, and which a physical contagion carries over to the attention of the ="trms">spectator.”


1880s and 1890s is exactly the time where many ="trms">different discourses considered the ways in which external forces and procedures could influence or control both individual and collective subject
="prgrph">-common in French ="trms">sociological thinkers (Durkheim, Tarde, Le Bon)='lgc'>: the primal fact of ="trms">social life is some ="trms">system of control or coercion that is imposed on the individual ='lgc'>{for example Tarde='lgc'>: “stupefied and feverish beings ='lgc'>[in='lgc'>] magical charm of their environment ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] it is always more fatiguing to think for oneself ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] man lives in an animated environment ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] he gradually refrains from all intellectual efforts ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] his mind becomes stultified and more and more ex="trms">cited ='lgc'>[= ="trms">somnambu="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic='lgc'>] characteristic of many city dwellers ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]"='lgc'>}

the audience in many artworks still today has the sign of the distracted crowd (جمعیت خواب)

(“man without qualities” =) de-individualized='lgc'> = sug="trms">gestible, hypnotizable

(Fried='lgc'>:)
anti-rococo French painting='lgc'>: a painting had to first attract (call to someone) and then to arrest (bring him to a halt in front of itself) and finally to enthral (hold him there as if spellbound)='lgc'> = the ="trms">modernizing ="trms">instrumentality that is fulfilled in cinema today

for Tarde='lgc'>:
“="trms">social existence='lgc'> = ="trms">somnambulism"='lgc'>[= heightened receptivity to sug="trms">gestion, individuals apt to imitate one another='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “="trms">social='lgc'> = (a form of) dream”
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> hypnotic aspect of the life of crowds
="lsts lst1">•“="trms">intercerebration”='lgc'>: one brain fascinates the other
="lsts lst1">•“="trms">fashion's sug="trms">gestibility”='lgc'>: half-conscious observation and mere physical proximity produce a functional ="trms">social homogeneity
="lsts lst1">•“fascination”='lgc'>: a genuine ="trms">neurosis, a kind of polarization of ="trms">love and faith  ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> effects of obedience and imitation
="lsts lst1">•“attention”='lgc'>: transformation of sensation by effort and desire ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the desire for an increase in personal believe
="lsts lst1">•“plateau”='lgc'>: a flexible figure for ="trms">natural, ="trms">social, and statistical processes and events (in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding desire) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Deleuze and ="ppl">Guattari's plateau='lgc'>]

Le Bon='lgc'>:
“="trms">social='lgc'> = a particular modality of perception,” as a ="trms">specific ="trms">social arrangement that conditions the limits of perceptual experience
(="trms">modern) crowd='lgc'>: a viewing machine capable of generating “collective ="trms">hallucinations,” a place for ="trms">consumption of illusion, (with a “psychological unity” that occupies spatially remote locations,)
="lsts lst1">•“observation”='lgc'>: a cognitive model predicated on workable notion of objective reality (a classical ="trms">epistemological model) that begins to corrode within a field saturated by illusion, ="trms">hallucination, and whole industries of simulation
="prgrph">-individual subsumed in crowd is incapable of observation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">modern ="trms">spectacular culture (to be ="trms">articulated 7 decades later by ="ppl">Guy ="ppl">Debord

the crowd (in Le Bon) is a ="trms">generalized site on which the accumulated d="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read and hope as="trms">sociated in the 19th century with ="trms">social insurrection collapse into am abstract countless mass ="trms">onto which dream ="trms">imaginary of any ="trms">sort can be projected
="prgrph">-="ppl">="ppl">Crary

19th century ‘crowd psychology’ ='thdf'>assumption that attention has no necessary connection to objective optical observation of the ="trms">world ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*crowd='lgc'>: drift toward a more primitive order of consciousness='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-withdrawal from surroundings and refocusing on some real or ="trms">symbolic figure
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theatrical con="trms">figuration='lgc'>: means for controlling crowds ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (La Bon's) image of theater exceeding its older place within models of ="trms">mimetic ="trms">relation ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> new effects of subjectification


Wagner's volkish homogeneity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> uniform modes of perception and ="trms">response ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (problem of) ="trms">community formation

Wagner's optical ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor (="trms">community could see itself reflected in the mirror of tragedy) of theatrical existence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*sense of vision serves to reinforce one's place within the ="trms">social whole='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when i look at Brussels from the 14th floor...='lgc'>]

Wagner's cultural program for ="trms">social re="trms">integration and his belief in the transformative effects of the collective experience of music drama preformed and produced as a ritual ="trms">communal event

(typical 19th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> debates about the effects of mass culture ='lgc'>--="trms">articulated='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “distraction ='lgc'>=/= self-conscious contemplative perception” ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) Wagner's deploying the ="trms">pervasiveness of ='strcls'>*distracted modes of cultural ="trms">consumption='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “higher (deeply attentive ='lgc'>--advocated='lgc'>='lgc'>--> purified and ethically superior perceptual engagement) ='lgc'>=/= lower (distracted)” forms of ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening
="prgrph">-his dissatisfaction with traditional theatre that had allowed or encouraged audiences to look at each other at the diverse ="trms">social texture of the theatre

an attentive, absorbed public (unthinkable in the 18th century ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Sennett)

(still we are suffering ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ='lgc'>[to have='lgc'>] ='strcls'>*control over the attentiveness of an audience='strcls'>* to subordinate it to the will of the artist ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> generate a ='strcls'>*collective state of reception='strcls'>* (worthy of an art with such ="trms">social aspiration ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda, ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali , ="frds">Sina, ='lgc'>--to which extent my mysticism in art was about my ideas about ="trms">spectators incapacity for attention in contemporary ="nms">Tehran='qstn'>?)

19th century theatre ='lgc'>--(transform into)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***construction of visibility='strcls'>*** (structure the ="trms">spectators perceptual experience)

“collective act of seeing ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> semblance of a ="trms">community”

(phantasmagoric character of his work) Wagner='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•eliminating lateral views ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> frontal engagement
="lsts lst1">•near-complete darkness ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> preventing peripheral distraction
="lsts lst1">•lowering the orchestra out of sight
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">systematic concealing and mystification of the process of production
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (Wagner stands for) will to mastery over all aspects of the ="trms">spectacle ='lgc'>==allow='lgc'>='lgc'>==> calculated production of states of regression, fascination, dream (="trms">synchronized sound ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cinema's attentiveness half a century later)
="prgrph">-control over emotional ="trms">response
="prgrph">-remaking of ="trms">spectator experience
="prgrph">-production of dreamlike clairvoyant

(-can theater ="trms">stage be a place of distraction='qstn'>? again)

intelligible ="trms">relation of distance between viewer and illusory s="trms">cene
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the way diorama commanded visual attention

in my ="trms">stage design drawings from 2009='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•standardized perspectival expectations
="lsts lst1">•metric ="trms">relations
="lsts lst1">•="trms">position of ="trms">spectator
="lsts lst1">•luminous detached rectangle
="prgrph">- 

Wagner's Ring cycle='lgc'>: the last expression of a 19th century fantasy of the recuperation of tragedy and myth ='lgc'>~ the dream that culture could make whole what capitalism has broken ='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Crary='lgc'>+="ppl">Lacoue-Labarthe='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[disturbing conviction/dream:='lgc'>] in an age where transcendence is undone, (the vacations of) art can recover an ancient destination and establish the type of mythological figure (in which humanity or a people could recognize itself)


="prgrph">-verisimilitude='lgc'>: the quality of seeming to be true, gloss, semblance


com="trms">posite ="trms">imaginary of the 19th century

="large lg14" stl="font-size:108%"> ______________


crowd
theater
phantasmagoria

="ppl">="ppl">Crary ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Seurat's Parade de Cirque='lgc'> = disclosure of ='strcls'>*the absence at the heart of ="trms">modern ="trms">spectacle and perception='strcls'>*

vivid opening into a light-filled action-filled arena

='at'>@="nms">apass, a common way of criticism='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*evoke, then withhold='strcls'>*
(fir example='lgc'>: evoke ‘entertainment commodity’ but withhold it. ="frds scrmbld">Laura, ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alex,Alert,Aleph,Alessi">Ale ,)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*invest, and dismantle='strcls'>* (we are invested in what we dismantle)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*desolation of older s="trms">cenes of re="trms">presentation='strcls'>* ='at'>@="frds">Sina

="ppl">="ppl">Crary on Seurat Cirque ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> investigation of the conditions under which a subject could be activated as an attentive perceiver
(forensic ="trms">aesthetics ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> conditions under which a subject could be arrested as a witness)
(="frds">Sina ="nms">ajayeb ="trms">bestiary ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> conditions under which a subject could be contested as a knowing ="trms">agent)

“frame='lgc'>: an isolating ="trms">agent” (='lgc'><='lgc'>== Wagner ='lgc'>~ to make an ='strcls'>*autonomous and luminous field of attraction='strcls'>* with a deliberately ambiguous spatial identity)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> explicit r="trms">enunciation of the classical (and early ="trms">modern) status of the image
='lgc'>=/= as a windowlike plane ="trms">intersecting a cone of vision
='lgc'>=/= as a flat plane covered with colored patches

(Seurat's optics='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>***images apparitional value='strcls'>*** ='lgc'><='lgc'>== effect of image's detachment from a broader visual field (='lgc'>=/= diaroma and stereoscop)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> 19th century optical experiences that severed the image from any continuous or intelligible ="trms">relation to the ="trms">position of the observing objects
(='lgc'>=/= Wagnerian ="trms">aesthetics)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*collective visual experience='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> precinematic forms of moving images

(='at'>@="nms">apass='lgc'>: hand drawing is not about being “="trms">trapped in older artisanal modes of production” ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “performance ='lgc'>=/= projection”)

to assess (the ="trms">relationships between)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•your own ="trms">technological products
="lsts lst1">•makeup of your audience
="lsts lst1">•economical realities of the ="trms">marketplace
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> inventor of 19th century (Raynaud, Edison, )
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> modify your machines in terms of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•performance
="lsts lst1">•shifting audience needs (and possibilities)

phantasmagoric='lgc'>: occultation of production by means of the outward appearance of the product (creating an experience for a solitary and immobile ="trms">spectator)

(spectral) atopic image='lgc'>: ="trms">literally not there

="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%"> shimmering ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> effect of detachment from the environment

Reynaud's projected moving images ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> elastic and reversible temporalities (that had little to do with Lumieres's “real time”)

Cheret's posters (joyful ="trms">modern women, advertisement for cosmetics, lighting fixtures, department stores, ballets, and so on) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a ="trms">technology of attention ='lgc'>+ a ="trms">specific ornamental re="trms">presentation of commodity culture
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> practical functionings of ="trms">consumption culture in the 1870s) ='at'>@OSP
='strcls'>*Cheret's “personal style” in graphic design='lgc'> = an abstract luster جلوه a decorative ="trms">formula that could be applied promiscuously to any possible object of ="trms">consumption='strcls'>* ='lgc'>=/= Seurat's dream of universal style

='strcls'>****rich textures of entertainment and visual ="trms">spectacle='strcls'>****

="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%"> ="prgrph">-which range of optical ="trms">apparatuses are available for public ="trms">consumption now='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[in 1880s='lgc'>: peep show, magic lantern, shadow theater, large-scale stethoscope, zeo="trms">tropes, etc.='lgc'>]

my links with Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> his ="trms">interest in='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•contemporary popular visual culture
="lsts lst1">•perceptual ="trms">modernization
="lsts lst1">•

="ppl">="ppl">Crary's ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading of Seurat's cirque='lgc'>: new experience of form deployed in time ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> kinematic (='lgc'>=/= semantic, iconographic significance of the clown and ac[...]