[...]e allegorical abstractions='qstn'>? (in ="ppl">Sohrevardi image='lgc'>: the mediation between heaven and earth) (horizons, vanishing points, grids, orthogonals, heavenward movements, ="trms">gestures, axis or axiomatic ="trms">geometry,,,)
='lgc'>[my performances are teachings on how to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read the figural ="trms">language of my image assemblages (='qstn'>?)='lgc'>]
the particular ="trms">geometry of pictorial structure in my image assemblages testifies to which truth='qstn'>?
which pictorial realizations (knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of things) do they epitomize='qstn'>?
which ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical polarities ="trms">translated into ="trms">geometric contrasts='qstn'>? (="trms">integral part of revealed truth) ='lgc'>[or that there is a or no central truth...='qstn'>?='lgc'>]
which allusions ground the abstract truth of the image in a certain reality='qstn'>?
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--David Rosand's) Raphael='lgc'>: theological truth ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> axiomatic ="trms">geometry (='lgc'>~ congruence of simple structures) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> divinity of the circle
super="trms">natural status of the form, reaffirmed by gold (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- an archaic and discounseled ="trms">technique) ='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*put ‘form’ beyond the reach of pictorial illusion and beyond the realm of ="trms">nature='strcls'>*
='strcls'>*pictorial truth sometimes lies in the pa="trms">inter's choice in working on the surface='strcls'>* (acknowledging the powerful claims of the axis of the field and the determining control of its shape, recognizing the dialectic of circle and square, the signifying tension between picture plane and orthogonal recession, etc.) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in the case of Raphael='lgc'>: theology becomes a commentary on painting ='lgc'>: pictorial structure (directly ="trms">semiotic and not ="trms">mimetic)='lgc'> = meaning

(always='qstn'>?) ='strcls'>*faithfuls need their o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginals='strcls'>*


in Helmholtz's 1856 comprehensive account of human vision, the eye emerges ='strcls'>*empathically embedded in the thinness and opacity of the body='strcls'>*
eye (='lgc'>=/= a marvelous ="trms">apparatus) ='lgc'>: an ="trms">apparatus with built-in aberrations, proneness to error, and inconsistencies in is processing of visual information ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> entoptical ="trms">phenomenon ='lgc'>--James='lgc'>='lgc'>--> subjective optical sensation='lgc'>: ='thdf'>example of selective attention ex="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes from consciousness sensations that are ='strcls'>*nonreferential='strcls'>* (= irrelevant to the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge about the ="trms">world)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>~= Ernst Mach's sight phantasms)

="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> arborescent ="trms">vocabulary of the ="trms">scientific ="trms">literature on the eye in the 1880s

='strcls'>*new diagram of the eye='lgc'>: photoreceptors in the human eye are placed at the back of retina, behind the blood vessels (that ="trms">literally ="trms">intervene seeing) ='lgc'>--Seurat='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inseparable mix of an abstract mathematically constructed ='and'>& a physiological perception more subjectivity determined, “domain of vision has been ="trms">integrated Iin the field of desire” (="ppl">Lacan), “phantasmatic events that occur on the surface of the bodies” (="ppl">="ppl">Crary)
='lgc'>=/= older diagram of the eye='lgc'>: the ideal unobstructed functioning of camera obscura ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘s="trms">cene of re="trms">presentation’

‘dream of immediacy’ ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (Seurat's refusal of scenography ='lgc'>==> nondisclosure ='lgc'>~) fantasy of a theatre without re="trms">presentation

="ppl">Rousseau's affirmation of ='strcls'>*political self-sovereignty='strcls'>* in the ‘festival’='lgc'>: a ="trms">stage which ="trms">presents nothing to the sight ='lgc'>--="ppl">Derrida='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a place where the ="trms">spectator, ="trms">presenting himself as ="trms">spectacle, will no longer be seer or voyeur ='strcls'>*** (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- what i learned from Phill) ='lgc'>==> ="trms">presence will be full as the intimacy of a self-="trms">presence, as the sentiment of self-proximity, of self-sameness


="ppl">Lyotard='lgc'>: theatrically ="trms">fold ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a box closed upon itself ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> only those to appear on the ="trms">stage which come from what will be known as the ‘exterior’

='strcls'>*zero='lgc'>: the sign of the empty center, the place where everything is ="trms">supposed to be visible and intelligible ='lgc'>: the place of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> god, organized body, ="trms">society, capital, the ego, platonic forms, etc.

="ppl">Grosz='lgc'>: construction of ="trms">embodied subjectivity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mobius strip (a 19th century invention), inflection of mind and body to one another through a kind of twisting or inversion ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> rethinking ="trms">relations of the inside and the outside of the subject psychical ="trms">interior and corporeal exterior)
="prgrph">-sides of the mobius strip are not fundamental identities, the drift from one to the other side is uncontrollable

currents
and surfaces of this body
is coalescence of energy into phantasms
deceptive semblance
of a theater of re="trms">presentation

="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali's speech (and ="frds scrmbld">Jassem)='lgc'>: تاثیر گذاشتن (making what one knows into an effect on audience)
='lgc'>=/=
="frds">Sina's speech='lgc'>: به صورت موضوع درآوردن
(making what one guesses into a subject of discussion to be rethought)

irreducible com="trms">posite of properties belonging to the observer

perspective='lgc'>: transforming psychophysiological space into mathematical space ='lgc'>==> sum of all parts of space and its contents are absorbed into a single ‘quantum continuum’
="prgrph">-Panofsky perspective as ="trms">symbolic


analysis of sensation
“one coherent mass of sensations”
(Mach's legitimate and functional) ="trms">scientific impressionism

="large lg1" stl="font-size:144%"> ='strcls'>*="trms">modernization (and rationalization) of perceptual (and ="trms">aesthetic) ="trms">response='strcls'>* ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- preoccupation of Seurat, Eisenstein, Moholy-Nagy, Schoenberg


(="ppl">="ppl">Crary > Chastel > Seurat's ="trms">method was) a research into ="trms"nttrm="search">archetypal forms (lines, colors, directions) which answered to a double and deliberately compound ambition, at once ='strcls'>*****archaic regression and ="trms">scientific reduction='strcls'>***** ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- this describe ='mywrk'>my work!='lgc'>] the artist/pa="trms">inter's operations set up a meeting point between ='strcls'>*an ancient hieratic art and the rationalized discipline of the future='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[= ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> culturally reactionary component of my projects, progressive and regressive at once, (="trms">past and future)
='lgc'>=/= Meyer Schapiro's Seurat='lgc'>: an enlightened politically progressive artisan-artist embracing ="trms">science and ="trms">technological paradigms in the ="trms">interests of ='strcls'>*forging an image of a nonhierarchical ="trms">social ="trms">world='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- an uncritical stance towards “="trms">science” and “="trms">technology,” approaching “the rationality of ="trms">method” (in Seurat) as a final locus of meaning ='lgc'>=/= the site of powerful and unresolved contra="trms">dictions='lgc'>]='strcls'>****

="prgrph">-can our ="trms">modern practices be constituted without reinventing its ="trms">relations to the ancient='qstn'>?

troublesome ambivalence of Pythagoreanism='lgc'>: part of an animistic pre="trms">modern magical ="trms">world view yet deeply embedded in the essential ='thdf'>assumption of ="trms">modernity that all of ="trms">nature is understandable in terms of numbers (-Bloch, ="trms">modernism='lgc'>: quantitative side with ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics proper strictly ="trms">scientific ='lgc'>=/= figural-qualitative ="trms">symbolic side)
... ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Seurat's unresolvable problem='lgc'>: to think ="trms">simultaneously ='thdf'>the idea of universality in terms of ="trms">aesthetic absolute and the inescapable universality of ="trms">modern exchange and calculation
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (Norman Brown='lgc'>:) the money complex, archaic or ="trms">modern, is inseparable from ="trms">symbolism, and ='strcls'>*="trms">symbolism is (not the mark of rationality, as ="ppl">Simmel thought, but) the mark of sacred='strcls'>* ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Luiza's diagrams ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is important for ="nms">apass, “="trms">aesthetic experience occurs within, not above, the op="trms">position of the ="trms">symbolic and the economy, and within the lived conflict between self-activity and reification” -Brenkman='lgc'>]
='lgc'>==> undialectical disjunction of sacred and secular

="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%">
silent reflective monk

mechanical assemblage of never quite ="trms">integrated elements

Seurat's texture of work ='lgc'><== an intuition of the loss of art's immediacy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> shift of (what might have been) contemplation into mere attentiveness

="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%"> (="ppl">="ppl">Crary) Seurat concretizes the ='strcls'>*="trms">modern dilemma of the disappearance of aura='strcls'>*
...bringing into the work the forms of rationalization that eradicated aura in the first place ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> appearance is privileged over essence, and ="trms">technological rationality is deployed in the service of appearance

negotiating rapture

(="nms">ajayeb ='lgc'>='lgc'>~/=='qstn'>?) to produce a dialectic image='lgc'>: to criticize ="trms">modernity (='lgc'>~ foregrounding of the aura) through an act of ="trms">memory, and at the same time, to criticize archaism (='lgc'>~ nostalgia for the aura) through an act of essentially ="trms">modern invention (substitution and designification)


color...
how forms of ‘synthesis’ (optical mixture, purely additive and accumulative functions of industrialized procedures) produce ‘qualitative’ change (pre-bourgeois non-quantitative connection to ="trms">nature, for which color did not exist as an autonomous experience or as a separate and specialized ="trms">science)

="large lg5" stl="font-size:139%"> Seurat='lgc'>: surface fascinations consequences of a disappointment at the impossibility of immediacy and the ="trms">historical inaccessibility of the dream of the ritual/magical practice of art ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Seurat's work's exhaustive denial of ="trms">presence ='lgc'>==> (another kind of immediacy='lgc'>:) the ='strcls'>***fusing of image and eye='strcls'>*** ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Foad
='lgc'>=/= art as a medium for disclosing essential truths
='lgc'>=/= redemptive optimism

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

a desiring ="trms">system dependent on operat[...]