[...]e processes commonly used to induce the state of hypnosis ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] an effect of the same kind by the fixity which they suddenly impose upon life, and which a physical contagion carries over to the attention of the ="trms">spectator.”


1880s and 1890s is exactly the time where many ="trms">different discourses considered the ways in which external forces and procedures could influence or control both individual and collective subject
="prgrph">-common in French ="trms">sociological thinkers (Durkheim, Tarde, Le Bon)='lgc'>: the primal fact of ="trms">social life is some ="trms">system of control or coercion that is imposed on the individual ='lgc'>{for example Tarde='lgc'>: “stupefied and feverish beings ='lgc'>[in='lgc'>] magical charm of their environment ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] it is always more fatiguing to think for oneself ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] man lives in an animated environment ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] he gradually refrains from all intellectual efforts ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] his mind becomes stultified and more and more ex="trms">cited ='lgc'>[= ="trms">somnambu="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic='lgc'>] characteristic of many city dwellers ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]"='lgc'>}

the audience in many artworks still today has the sign of the distracted crowd (جمعیت خواب)

(“man without qualities” =) de-individualized='lgc'> = sug="trms">gestible, hypnotizable

(Fried='lgc'>:)
anti-rococo French painting='lgc'>: a painting had to first attract (call to someone) and then to arrest (bring him to a halt in front of itself) and finally to enthral (hold him there as if spellbound)='lgc'> = the ="trms">modernizing ="trms">instrumentality that is fulfilled in cinema today

="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> for Tarde='lgc'>:
“="trms">social existence='lgc'> = ="trms">somnambulism"='lgc'>[= heightened receptivity to sug="trms">gestion, individuals apt to imitate one another='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “="trms">social='lgc'> = (a form of) dream”
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> hypnotic aspect of the life of crowds
="lsts lst1">•“="trms">intercerebration”='lgc'>: one brain fascinates the other
="lsts lst1">•“="trms">fashion's sug="trms">gestibility”='lgc'>: half-conscious observation and mere physical proximity produce a functional ="trms">social homogeneity
="lsts lst1">•“fascination”='lgc'>: a genuine ="trms">neurosis, a kind of polarization of ="trms">love and faith  ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> effects of obedience and imitation
="lsts lst1">•“attention”='lgc'>: transformation of sensation by effort and desire ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the desire for an increase in personal believe
="lsts lst1">•“plateau”='lgc'>: a flexible figure for ="trms">natural, ="trms">social, and statistical processes and events (in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding desire) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Deleuze and ="ppl">Guattari's plateau='lgc'>]

Le Bon='lgc'>:
“="trms">social='lgc'> = a particular modality of perception,” as a ="trms">specific ="trms">social arrangement that conditions the limits of perceptual experience
(="trms">modern) crowd='lgc'>: a viewing machine capable of generating “collective ="trms">hallucinations,” a place for ="trms">consumption of illusion, (with a “psychological unity” that occupies spatially remote locations,)
="lsts lst1">•“observation”='lgc'>: a cognitive model predicated on workable notion of objective reality (a classical ="trms">epistemological model) that begins to corrode within a field saturated by illusion, ="trms">hallucination, and whole industries of simulation
="prgrph">-individual subsumed in crowd is incapable of observation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">modern ="trms">spectacular culture (to be ="trms">articulated 7 decades later by ="ppl">Guy ="ppl">Debord

the crowd (in Le Bon) is a ="trms">generalized site on which the accumulated d="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read and hope as="trms">sociated in the 19th century with ="trms">social insurrection collapse into am abstract countless mass ="trms">onto which dream ="trms">imaginary of any ="trms">sort can be projected
="prgrph">-="ppl">="ppl">Crary

19th century ‘crowd psychology’ ='thdf'>assumption that attention has no necessary connection to objective optical observation of the ="trms">world ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*crowd='lgc'>: drift toward a more primitive order of consciousness='strcls'>*
="prgrph">-withdrawal from surroundings and refocusing on some real or ="trms">symbolic figure
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theatrical con="trms">figuration='lgc'>: means for controlling crowds ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (La Bon's) image of theater exceeding its older place within models of ="trms">mimetic ="trms">relation ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> new effects of subjectification

="large lg1" stl="font-size:129%">
Wagner's volkish homogeneity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> uniform modes of perception and ="trms">response ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (problem of) ="trms">community formation

Wagner's optical ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor (="trms">community could see itself reflected in the mirror of tragedy) of theatrical existence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*sense of vision serves to reinforce one's place within the ="trms">social whole='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when i look at Brussels from the 14th floor...='lgc'>]

Wagner's cultural program for ="trms">social re="trms">integration and his belief in the transformative effects of the collective experience of music drama preformed and produced as a ritual ="trms">communal event

(typical 19th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> debates about the effects of mass culture ='lgc'>--="trms">articulated='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “distraction ='lgc'>=/= self-conscious contemplative perception” ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) Wagner's deploying the ="trms">pervasiveness of ='strcls'>*distracted modes of cultural ="trms">consumption='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “higher (deeply attentive ='lgc'>--advocated='lgc'>='lgc'>--> purified and ethically superior perceptual engagement) ='lgc'>=/= lower (distracted)” forms of ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening
="prgrph">-his dissatisfaction with traditional theatre that had allowed or encouraged audiences to look at each other at the diverse ="trms">social texture of the theatre

an attentive, absorbed public (unthinkable in the 18th century ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Sennett)

(still we are suffering ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ='lgc'>[to have='lgc'>] ='strcls'>*control over the attentiveness of an audience='strcls'>* to subordinate it to the will of the artist ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> generate a ='strcls'>*collective state of reception='strcls'>* (worthy of an art with such ="trms">social aspiration ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda, ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alice,Shariati">Ali , ="frds">Sina, ='lgc'>--to which extent my mysticism in art was about my ideas about ="trms">spectators incapacity for attention in contemporary ="nms">Tehran='qstn'>?)

19th century theatre ='lgc'>--(transform into)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***construction of visibility='strcls'>*** (structure the ="trms">spectators perceptual experience)

“collective act of seeing ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> semblance of a ="trms">community”

(phantasmagoric character of his work) Wagner='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•eliminating lateral views ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> frontal engagement
="lsts lst1">•near-complete darkness ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> preventing peripheral distraction
="lsts lst1">•lowering the orchestra out of sight
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">systematic concealing and mystification of the process of production
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (Wagner stands for) will to mastery over all aspects of the ="trms">spectacle ='lgc'>==allow='lgc'>='lgc'>==> calculated production of states of regression, fascination, dream (="trms">synchronized sound ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cinema's attentiveness half a century later)
="prgrph">-control over emotional ="trms">response
="prgrph">-remaking of ="trms">spectator experience
="prgrph">-production of dreamlike clairvoyant

(-can theater ="trms">stage be a place of distraction='qstn'>? again)

intelligible ="trms">relation of distance between viewer and illusory s="trms">cene
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the way diorama commanded visual attention

in my ="trms">stage design drawings from 2009='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•standardized perspectival expectations
="lsts lst1">•metric ="trms">relations
="lsts lst1">•="trms">position of ="trms">spectator
="lsts lst1">•luminous detached rectangle
="prgrph">- 

Wagner's Ring cycle='lgc'>: the last expression of a 19th century fantasy of the recuperation of tragedy and myth ='lgc'>~ the dream that culture could make whole what capitalism has broken ='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Crary='lgc'>+="ppl">Lacoue-Labarthe='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[disturbing conviction/dream:='lgc'>] in an age where transcendence is undone, (the vacations of) art can recover an ancient destination and establish the type of mythological figure (in which humanity or a people could recognize itself)


="prgrph">-verisimilitude='lgc'>: the quality of seeming to be true, gloss, semblance

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%">
com="trms">posite ="trms">imaginary of the 19th century

______________


="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%"> crowd
theater
phantasmagoria

="ppl">="ppl">Crary ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Seurat's Parade de Cirque='lgc'> = disclosure of ='strcls'>*the absence at the heart of ="trms">modern ="trms">spectacle and perception='strcls'>*

vivid opening into a light-filled action-filled arena

='at'>@="nms">apass, a common way of criticism='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*evoke, then withhold='strcls'>*
(fir example='lgc'>: evoke ‘entertainment commodity’ but withhold it. ="frds scrmbld">Laura, ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alex,Alert,Aleph,Alessi">Ale ,)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*invest, and dismantle='strcls'>* (we are invested in what we dismantle)
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*desolation of older s="trms">cenes of re="trms">presentation='strcls'>* ='at'>@="frds">Sina

="ppl">="ppl">Crary on Seurat Cirque ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> investigation of the conditions under which a subject could be activated as an attentive perceiver
(forensic ="trms">aesthetics ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> conditions under which a subject could be arrested as a witness)
(="frds">Sina ="nms">ajayeb ="trms">bestiary ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> conditions under which a subject could be contested as a knowing ="trms">agent)

="large lg5" stl="font-size:155%"> “frame='lgc'>: an isolating ="trms">agent” (='lgc'><='lgc'>== Wagner ='lgc'>~ to make an ='strcls'>*autonomous and luminous field of attraction='strcls'>* with a deliberately ambiguous spatial identity)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> explicit r="trms">enunciation of the classical (and early ="trms">modern) status of the image
='lgc'>=/= as a windowlike plane ="trms">intersecting a cone of vision
='lgc'>=/= as a flat plane covered with colored patches

(Seurat's optics='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>***images apparitional value='strcls'>*** ='lgc'><='lgc'>== effect of image's detachment from a broader visual field (='lgc'>=/= diaroma and stereoscop)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> 19th century optical experiences that severed the image from any continuous or intelligible ="trms">relation to the ="trms">position of the observing objects
(='lgc'>=/= Wagnerian ="trms">aesthetic[...]