[...]tested as a knowing ="trms">agent)

“frame='lgc'>: an isolating ="trms">agent” (='lgc'><== Wagner ='lgc'>~ to make an ='strcls'>*autonomous and luminous field of attraction='strcls'>* with a deliberately ambiguous spatial identity)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> explicit r="trms">enunciation of the classical (and early ="trms">modern) status of the image
='lgc'>=/= as a windowlike plane ="trms">intersecting a cone of vision
='lgc'>=/= as a flat plane covered with colored patches

(Seurat's optics='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>***images apparitional value='strcls'>*** ='lgc'><== effect of image's detachment from a broader visual field (='lgc'>=/= diaroma and stereoscop)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> 19th century optical experiences that severed the image from any continuous or intelligible ="trms">relation to the ="trms">position of the observing objects
(='lgc'>=/= Wagnerian ="trms">aesthetics)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*collective visual experience='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> precinematic forms of moving images

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%"> (='at'>@="nms">apass='lgc'>: hand drawing is not about being “="trms">trapped in older artisanal modes of production” ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “performance ='lgc'>=/= projection”)

to assess (the ="trms">relationships between)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•your own ="trms">technological products
="lsts lst1">•makeup of your audience
="lsts lst1">•economical realities of the ="trms">marketplace
='lgc'>}='lgc'>==> inventor of 19th century (Raynaud, Edison, )
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> modify your machines in terms of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•performance
="lsts lst1">•shifting audience needs (and possibilities)

phantasmagoric='lgc'>: occultation of production by means of the outward appearance of the product (creating an experience for a solitary and immobile ="trms">spectator)

(spectral) atopic image='lgc'>: ="trms">literally not there

shimmering ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> effect of detachment from the environment

Reynaud's projected moving images ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> elastic and reversible temporalities (that had little to do with Lumieres's “real time”)

Cheret's posters (joyful ="trms">modern women, advertisement for cosmetics, lighting fixtures, department stores, ballets, and so on) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a ="trms">technology of attention ='lgc'>+ a ="trms">specific ornamental re="trms">presentation of commodity culture
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> practical functionings of ="trms">consumption culture in the 1870s) ='at'>@OSP
='strcls'>*Cheret's “personal style” in graphic design='lgc'> = an abstract luster جلوه a decorative ="trms">formula that could be applied promiscuously to any possible object of ="trms">consumption='strcls'>* ='lgc'>=/= Seurat's dream of universal style

='strcls'>****rich textures of entertainment and visual ="trms">spectacle='strcls'>****

="prgrph">-which range of optical ="trms">apparatuses are available for public ="trms">consumption now='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[in 1880s='lgc'>: peep show, magic lantern, shadow theater, large-scale stethoscope, zeo="trms">tropes, etc.='lgc'>]

my links with Seurat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> his ="trms">interest in='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•contemporary popular visual culture
="lsts lst1">•perceptual ="trms">modernization
="lsts lst1">•

="ppl">="ppl">Crary's ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading of Seurat's cirque='lgc'>: new experience of form deployed in time ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> kinematic (='lgc'>=/= semantic, iconographic significance of the clown and acrobat in the painting) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*the illusion of movement='strcls'>*
beginning with the phenakistoscope and zoe="trms">trope in the 1830s ='lgc'>--through='lgc'>='lgc'>--> innumerable optical devices all the way into 1890s ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> endlessly fascinating and repetitive ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sites of attentiveness (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= attraction)

='lgc'>{ Seurat ='lgc'>+ Reynaud ='lgc'>+ Edison (='lgc'>~ producers of the ='strcls'>***machines of the visible='strcls'>***, allowing the constructed and synthetic ="trms">nature of machine vision to coincide with their own rationalization of perceptual process) ='lgc'>+ forms of machinic vision developing through 1880s ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (examples of an emerging) ='strcls'>*****industrial art='strcls'>***** ='lgc'>: from ='strcls'>*artisanal practices='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> standardizing industrial modes of image-making

="ppl">="ppl">Crary ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading Seurat without isolating him from the effects of what Raynaud, Edison and many others (Muybridge, Fuhrmann,) were developing through out the 1880s

='lgc'>{ the audience in Seurat's painting='lgc'> = the audience of the static backgrounds used in Reynaud's machines ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the unchanging, unreflective, even unseeing ="trms">nature of ="trms">modern ="trms">spectatorship ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*a crowd of ="trms">spectators permanently in place, installed as a fundamental component of the ="trms">social ="trms">world='strcls'>* (in which the ="trms">specific content displayed to them is the ="trms">matter of absolute inconsequence)

shadow show
clown as magician-engineer who with his ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right hand opens the curtains ="trms">onto an illuminated and abstractly assembled plane of visual stimulation

(Seurat were disclosed to the) congruence of an im="trms">material, atopic and evanescent image with powerful reality effects and ="trms">techniques of attraction

="trms">techniques of perceptual ="trms">modernization ='lgc'>--constituting='lgc'>='lgc'>--> an autonomous space of invention ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> imposing its own constructed visions and truths on viewers

(="ppl">="ppl">Crary shows how) the mechanization of vision had no intrinsic link to objectivity, but rather to new capacities for simulation, illusion, conjuration

(my paintings='qstn'>? ...early) dreams of an impossible and inhuman vision, of a desire for perceptual ubiquity exceeding the spacial and temporal limits of human faculties ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> remake the self into a sovereign eye would create and impose its own truths
="prgrph">-the horses of Gericault and Seurat, in their airborne oneiric ="trms">trajectories, incarnate a deeper truth of the body='lgc'>: they become abstract correlates of psychological and kinetic ="trms">response to perceived movement ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ideomotor experience (='lgc'>=/= truth of mechanical spatial movement)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">ajayeb description movement ="trms">animal in motion)

='strcls'>***="trms">animal is arrested ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">presence is not directly accessible to human vision, but can only be the product of ="trms">technical procedures of simulation='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “="trms">nature='lgc'> = scenographic space” (='lgc'>--collapse='lgc'>='lgc'>--> precondition for the impossible unseeable apparition specter ='lgc'>--Seurat='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">spectacle)

phantasmal homeostasis
detemporalization of experience

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> management of attention ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">techniques of attraction

(="frds scrmbld">Foad and) Seurat's efforts (in Cirque)='lgc'>: abstract conceptualization of perceptual experience

(possibility of ="trms">spectacle)
differed
displaced
denied
(image of ="trms">spectacle)
derealized
drained of ="trms">presence

='strcls'>*attentiveness of an observing subject='strcls'>*='lgc'> = site of increasingly specialized operations of power

="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%"> ...a twilight state of restricted consciousness ='lgc'>==> (Durkheimian solidarity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what is at stake is that) the autonomy of the individual is reduced

='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Crary='lgc'>='lgc'>--> importance of Seurat's work ='lgc'>: to have intuited ='strcls'>**how the collapse of scenic space allowed new ="trms">imaginary ="trms">figuration of immediacy='strcls'>** (of a regressive unity based on a corporeal engagement of the ="trms">spectator) ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Esther, ="nms">apass, OSP, ="frds scrmbld">Femke

Seurat sensed something fundamental about the industrialization of contemplation (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> now fully matured in Hollywood cinema) ='lgc'>+ (he anticipated, like Wagner) the ='strcls'>*effects of a phantasmatic luminous image on which essence had been displaced by appearance='strcls'>*

(you can still) escape into the psychological time (but don't erase the sense of the obdurate ="trms">historical conditions out of which your dreams of equilibrium emerges)

Seurat's resisted the temptation of the phantasmagoric and of myth (='lgc'>=/= Wagner)
(='lgc'>='lgc'>--> are we the hairs of Seurat='qstn'>?)
="lsts lst1">•exposure of ="trms">technical premises
="lsts lst1">•subversion of any stable “formation” (or ="trms">Gestalt, on which the al="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure of the myth depends)
='lgc'>--Buchloh='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***avant-garde='lgc'>: a continually renewed struggle over the de="trms">finition of cultural meaning, the discovery and re="trms">presentation of new audiences, and the development of new strategies to counteract and develop resistence against the tendency of the ideological ="trms">apparatuses of the culture industry to occupy and control all practices and spaces of re="trms">presentation='strcls'>*** (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>that is why i am ="trms">interested in Walt Disney and Hollywood and Qur'an)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*to produce incompatibilities='strcls'>* (as an artistic strategy, visual or ="trms">epistemic and otherwise; to make opacity, hostility to virtuosity and expressionism, )

="large lg5" stl="font-size:122%"> your work could be adjacent to ____
but not identical to ____

your work might be built out if mechanisms for the production of subjective ="trms">response ='lgc'>--but='lgc'>='lgc'>--> it is never reducible to them
='at'>@OSP, ="frds scrmbld">Femke



Cezanne ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (nonoptical) art of attention
music ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a mode of experience ='lgc'>=/= an art of time

(unstable status of an apprentice observer in 1900s) Cezanne='lgc'> = reinvention of synthesis (='lgc'>=/= Manet and Seurat's strategies of binding, homeostasis, fixation)

="ppl">="ppl">Crary highlighting the highly contested ="trms">nature of the ="trms">questions of attention (possibly of pure perception, ="trms">presence, etc. in 1890s) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> recreation of attentive ="trms">presence amid the impact of new conceptualizations and organizations of motion, ="trms">memory, temporality (='lgc'>+ emerging ="trms">technological arrangements)

='lgc'>[one of many sites in the late 19th century where a crisis in perception is diagnosed:='lgc'>]
Cezanne ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">Husserl='lgc'>: attempt to bypass the ac[...]