[...]/> Jungian ="trms"nttrm="search">archetype ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> extra-individual, suprasensory ="trms">world
Frankfurt school ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">Althusser saw collective unconscious as fascistic


='strcls'>*(my) ="trms">material practices of unlearning='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•pretending i don't know ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> enactment / acting
="lsts lst1">•(to try) forgetting ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> clearance / erasure
="lsts lst1">•sleep-walking ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> closing the eyes of certain perceptive ="trms">stories, and become available to another
="lsts lst1">•the “let's not assume...” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “in advance” of a the assumption
="lsts lst1">•

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%">
contemporary Western thought, tired of the sovereign subject, is trying to conceive of an extra-subjective reality that binds individuals ethically to others and to ="trms">history ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this is totally ="nms">apass ='lgc'>:)
="prgrph">-contemporary Western thought (evident in ="ppl">Butler, ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault, and many others) is seeking a politically efficacious concept of the collective ="trms">imaginary='strcls'>*** (a ="trms">positive conception of alterity, of an outside that inspires the ="trms">imagination to create)

="nms">ajayeb for me is an alterity (of an quasi outside='lgc'>--not quite inside) that inspires the ="trms">imagination to create (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">imagination is always creative)
="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>: alterity of a ="trms">world that inspired (and inspires) ="trms">storytelling and ="trms">imagination (to create beings)


since ="ppl">Sohrevardi the islamic philosophy has abandoned substantialism for process

="ppl">="ppl">Sadra's approach='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•process ="trms">ontology
="lsts lst1">•critique of abstraction
="lsts lst1">•celebration of singularity

God='lgc'> = neccessary being واجب الوجود

(tashkhis-e vojud تشخیص وجود) modulation of being ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> individuation (تشخص tashakhos)
ذات مخصوص, فرد مشخص معین, وجود جزئی اشیاء ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> موجودی است که از نظر قانونی می تواند موضوع حق قرار بگیرد
='lgc'>=/= شخص ناپیدا ='lgc'>=/= ="nms">hayula
='lgc'>[tashkhis (everyday ="trms">gesture of recognition of something gheir-shakhsi) ='lgc'>==>='qstn'>? tashakhos='lgc'>]

(="ppl">Simondon='lgc'>:) individuation is ="trms">prior to individuals, and individuals are simply ="trms">symptoms or effects of individuation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> very processual

harkat-e johari حرکت جوهریtranssubstantiation, trans-substantial movement
='strcls'>*harkat-e johari respects the potential for intensification ='lgc'>[= the capacity to know, act, and fully participate in the flow of being ='lgc'>--and='lgc'>='lgc'>--> continual intensification;='lgc'>] in all things (in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding ="nms">hayula)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Miyazaki's faceless ="trms">monster's ‘act of beiong’ (is efficaciously real in a Sadrian way)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="ppl">="ppl">Sadra's great re="trms">figuration is that he ="trms">formulates the ‘act of being’ itself as the most real
="prgrph">-="ppl">Miyazaki's ="trms">monster (and ="ppl">Attar's San'an) is moved by ="trms">love, it is the energy that ="trms">traverses and transforms them; it is the best thing to be moved by. before, they are, in themselves, illusory and perishing
="prgrph">-="ppl">Miyazaki's ="trms">monster episode animation expresses how substance yields to process ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> خونابه اى plasmaticness of the animated line='lgc'>: freedom from ossification استخوانى شدن (='at'>#="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">Rigs), the ability to dynamically assume any form (Gunning) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> change occurring واقع from within ='lgc'>+ propelled سوق from without

="ppl">="ppl">Sadra's ="trms">matter='lgc'>: place of nonexistence and absence (='lgc'>=='qstn'>? ="nms">hayula)
="nms">hayula='lgc'>: form of the ="trms">natural, elemental body

in ="ppl">="ppl">Sadra='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•the plant(‘s form) (= vegetal soul) is ="trms">animal
="lsts lst1">•the ="trms">animal(‘s form ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? surat صورت) (= sensate substance) is human
="lsts lst1">•the human...


physical acts of perception

(a typical account='lgc'>:) the stronger the ="trms">imaginal soul, the less distracted it is by the body, the more manifestly ="trms">imaginal images will appear

fotuhat فتوحات  or tazkirat تذکره is the ="trms">stories of the intensity of their being, actualization, and certainty of effect
(="ppl">Attar's stuff, ="trms">articulate ="ppl">="ppl">Sadra)

saryan-e vojud سریان وجود, ='strcls'>*flow of being='strcls'>* (across the perceptible entities we encounter='lgc'>:) ='lgc'>[the ="trms">imaginal power working through them:='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•hear a person's say
="lsts lst1">•notice a weed growing
="lsts lst1">•smelling a...
="lsts lst1">•cognizing an image...
="lsts lst1">•touching a pig's nose ='lgc'>[San'anian='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•

bodily senses can contact the divine ="trms">presence, make contact, make a call (in ="ppl">Hafez, San'an's miscall)


="lsts lst1">•the ="trms">imaginal realm is populated by singularities, every changing and in="trms">finite
="lsts lst1">•the ="trms">imaginal faculty is of extreme ="trms">presence, of intensification
(in this case ‘realm’ and ‘faculty’ bleed into each other's ="trms">categories)


(let's get) creatively ="trms">imaginal

accurate and attractive

='strcls'>***="trms">imagination is (de="trms">finitely) not closing your eyes and dreaming, but being completely ="trms">present to the ="trms">world, committed to it and ="trms">affected by it='strcls'>*** (to perceive something in its intense singularity)


مشاهده moshahede='lgc'> = contemplation

the infinate flux of visible ="trms">phenomena (Kracauer)

قلمکار calico-="trms">world
چلوار

kaleidoscopic mountains

what was ="ppl">="ppl">Sadra looking (moshahede) at='qstn'>?

="lsts lst1">•linear modeling of time ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> clock time
="lsts lst1">•intensive model of time ='lgc'>==> movement across the “real” axis


effectively panpsychist='lgc'>: every entity is conscious, has a soul, and potential to intensify; minds in a ="trms">world of minds


="ppl">Whitehead's concept of transformative togetherness
="trms">ontological vitalism='lgc'>: exist ='lgc'>==> consciousness


reality precedes abstraction ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
for ="ppl">="ppl">Sadra “point of view” is a distraction (for vojud وجود)
="lsts lst1">•perspectives
="lsts lst1">•names
="lsts lst1">•quiddity
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> because the ="trms">positing of names and description is in cor="trms">respondence to concepts and universal meanings, not in cor="trms">respondence to existential identities and external/concrete forms (="ppl">="ppl">Sadra)
='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Avital and ="ppl">Kohn ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> but they do in amazonian forest ="trms">semiotics
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> my point of departure with ="ppl">="ppl">Sadra. i am tracing trans="trms">figurative signs of the flesh in practices of ="trms">storytelling ='lgc'>--(or not)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">="ppl">Sadra emphasizes that ="trms">imagination is better able to grasp Being='lgc'>: concepts are too static to capture/grasp the act of being (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> are they='qstn'>?! we have to deal with them anyway='lgc'>: ="trms">wild facts, ="trms">fables of practice, images are concepts, etc.)

ماهيت quiddity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that which is understood (='lgc'>=/= being ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that which is experienced)
quiddity in ="ppl">="ppl">Sadra is like the habits that ="ppl">Peirce and ="ppl">Bergson grudgingly accept as necessary for thought, though they need to be swept away for creativity to emerge. hence the importance of intuition for ="ppl">Bergson and ="ppl">="ppl">Sadra, and of induction for ="ppl">Peirce. (="ppl">="ppl">Marks)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (my departure='lgc'>:) a point of research branch for me='lgc'>: “to swept away quiddity”, is another ="trms">story possible='qstn'>?


images have the power to multiply ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> and other “sticky” things='qstn'>?

(like ="ppl">="ppl">Sadra and ="ppl">="ppl">Marks) i also prefer images that do not simply confirm general ="trms">categories of what can be thought but undermine them with singularities that stimulate the ="trms">imagination (='lgc'>=/= The Black Mirror tv series)


(destructive delusions, ideological images,) true visions and ="trms">hallucinations ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the disappointment in hearing the deja vu
="prgrph">-deja vu is the dream of re="trms">membering


the divine outside
an immanentized ="trms">imaginal real to be the source of truthful visions


to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read Qur'an (or any text) as if it has been revealed to you

="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%">
the visions of the ="trms">imaginal are nonstatice images of things in their act of becoming


="prgrph">-is my ="nms">ajayeb a ="trms">modern ="trms">interpreter of the islamic ="trms">imaginal realm='qstn'>?
the ="nms">ajayeb is about the lesser elite stances of the islamicated ="trms">imagination ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">imaginal ="trms">ecological consciousness
='lgc'>[title='lgc'>]

="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%">
='strcls'>*="trms">imagination in rational thought ='lgc'>[logocentrism='lgc'>]='lgc'>:
myth, ="trms">symbol, and ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors used as part of rational dialogue
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> other ways of bringing the unthought ='lgc'>[beyond='lgc'>] into the thinkable ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">tasavof
='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> other ways of bringing the far into the wondrous (='lgc'>~ the active ="trms">imaginal) ='lgc'>==> as a basis for practical concepts ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">ajayeb
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> beyond the official discourse


a time-="trms">specific (="trms">contingent) truth that intensifies as more people engage with it
='lgc'>[like all the concepts and ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors we are working and patterning in ="nms">apass='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg5" stl="font-size:121%">
Malabou's plasticity (='lgc'><='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>-- différance)
the subject is plastic (='lgc'>='lgc'>~= malleable, ='lgc'>=/= elastic), it never springs back into its o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal form, it can explode
='lgc'>[we are now dealing with a (highly adaptable, flexible, and disciplined) rational autonomous subject in a post-industrial and global ="trms">world='lgc'>]
="trms">neuronal subject
mojud-e dahri-e ma'ghul

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] اسم اع[...]