[...]
atheist political theology
Kojeve, ="ppl">Bataille, ="ppl">Sartre, Koyre, ="ppl">Heidegger, ="ppl">Adorno
mysticism of progress, self-perfection, and ="trms">history
their anti-utopian and antiprogressivist claims and that found expression in='lgc'>: ="ppl">Blanchot (The Most High), ="ppl">Bataille (Summa Atheologica), Camus (The Myth of Sisyphus), Beckett (Endgame)
="trms">figuration of ="trms">finitude
critique of dreams of transparency
replace transcendence with ="trms">excess or escape (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- mystical background...)
='lgc'>=/= un-self-conscious humanist mysticism

secular ="trms">interwar Europe's raising the human subject to all-powerful status ='lgc'>==> ="trms">techno-="trms">scientific apocalypse ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> waste of hope in the self and in the ="trms">rhetoric of equality and humanism


(2)
philosophical antihumanism
human in suspension and deny that it owns or controls his own ="trms">specificity and particularity

='lgc'>='lgc'>--> negative theology
denial to man of ="trms">positive knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of divine ="trms">nature
withdrawal from the possibility of first defining what is ="trms">specifically human
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">world deemed ="trms">anthropocentric and subjectivist
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*re="trms">formulates the ="trms">question of man, locating him in conceptual ="trms">systems led by notions, such as Being, reality, ="trms">society, or ="trms">language='strcls'>* (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to define him “negatively”)
="lsts lst1">•problematization of human subjectivity

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">modern determinations of “the human”
(Did="trms">erot in Encyclopedie='lgc'>:) “man='lgc'>: a sensing, reflecting, thinking being, which freely ="trms">traverses the surface of the earth, which appears at the head of all other ="trms">animals over which it reigns, which lives in ="trms">society, which has invented the ="trms">sciences and the arts, which has its own notions of good and evil, which gives itself masters, which makes its own laws, etc.”
="lsts lst1">•="trms">anthropocentrism of ="trms">modern thought (Did="trms">erot ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “why do we not introduce man into our work the way he is placed in the universe='qstn'>? why do we not make him a common center='qstn'>?”)
="lsts lst1">•(18th and 19th century) offering a hierarchy and linking the human to a privileged one among them='lgc'>--to reason, understanding, sensation, the passions, consciousness, the intellect

he can no longer claim to be capable of ="trms">scientifically understanding the entire ="trms">world

(="ppl">Kant in Logic, ='at'>@="nms">apass, three core ="trms">questions guiding his critical project='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•what do i know='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•what may i hope for='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•what ought i do='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•what is man='qstn'>?

='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]humanism='lgc'>: mobilization of a foundationa="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list concept of man

='lgc'>=/= tradition of identifying man with a certain feature, aspect, or property that ="trms">embodies or expresses his ="trms">nature
='lgc'>=/= the ="ppl">Platonic-christian idea that man possesses an eternal soul
='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Feuerbachian-="ppl">Marxist approach that sees Man as his own goal
='lgc'>=/= ='thdf'>the idea of a human ="trms">nature that is given, foundational, single, or ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readily available

“death of man”
="ppl">Heidegger's Letter on Humanism
Kojeve's second note on “the end of ="trms">history”
="ppl">Althusser
="ppl">="ppl">Foucault's con="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding chapter to The Order of Things
="ppl">Derrida's The Ends of Man

(existentia="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list en="trms">trapment of man in his ="trms">world, ='at'>#alienation)

(in Being and Time) ="ppl">Heidegger's Dasein ='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•stripping man's shared element down to its being-there
="lsts lst1">•subsumes and displaces the humanity of man
="lsts lst1">•rejection of the I as an absolute, independent subject that approaches a ="trms">world largely separate from it
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> from ontic determination ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ontico-="trms">ontological determination ='lgc'>[of human='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*the humanity of Dasein remains and must be understood as derivative of both its ontic and ="trms">ontological status

="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical pre="trms">supposition (that he cannot claim to be capable of fully describing or understanding ="trms">natur) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
(human approached and understood only in terms of) ='strcls'>*results='strcls'>* or ='strcls'>*side-effects='strcls'>* (of ="trms">language, existence, ="trms">history, ="trms">phenomena)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•in ="trms">phenomena='lgc'>: man finds himself thrown in the ="trms">world of ="trms">phenomena and life; he is not grounded in some transcendental ="trms">fashion (="ppl">Heidegger, Kojeve, Malraux, ="ppl">Sartre, Beaufret)
="lsts lst1">•in ="trms">language='lgc'>: he is an ="trms">interpreter of signs and ="trms">symbols that form part of greater ="trms">systems independent of his individual will
="lsts lst1">•in ="trms">history='lgc'>: he is constructed and operates within cultural, ="trms">religious, and philosophical limits imposed on him
="lsts lst1">•
='lgc'>[and='lgc'>] these ="trms">systems are not consequences of man's creative activity, desire, or will
they are domains in which he finds himself
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*the human in man comes to mean less and less='strcls'>* ='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*we can only know what his approach to others (and other things) can reveal='strcls'>*



emergence of the new nonhumanist atheism ='lgc'>+ the negative philosophical ="trms">anthropology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> French antihumanism's assault on='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•contemporary humanisms
="lsts lst1">•the legacies and utopian hopes of the Enlightenment
="lsts lst1">•liberal-bourgeois thinking grounded in human ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights and individual autonomy
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Marxist humanism with its critique of liberalism and its expectations of a superior
humanity
="lsts lst1">•(human perfection ='and'>& ="trms">social harmony)


(="ppl">Geroulanos's account of primary constellations of) humanism='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•christian humanism
="lsts lst1">•Renaissance educational humanism (founded on a return to ancient ="trms">Greek models)
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Humboldt's reconceptualization of Renaissance humanism (in 19th century Germany)
="lsts lst1">•Enlightenment humanism (from Montesquieu through ="ppl">Rousseau and Condorcet)
="lsts lst1">•19th century liberal humanism (frequently based on ="trms">natural law, autonomy over one's own body and mind, and human ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">socia="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list humanisms (with its commitment to contractarian ="trms">social theory)

Encyclopedie's attack on theological knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge

19th century construction of ="trms">modern humanism (="trms">sociopolitical goals of a “human ="trms">nature”) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> left-leaning, often democratic, (but certainly) utopian ="trms">sociopolitical mentality

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]ideology='lgc'>: a thinking that does not critique, nor even think its provenance from and proper ="trms">relation to reality ='lgc'>--="ppl">Nancy='lgc'>='lgc'>--> humanism='lgc'> = the machine par excellence through which a ="trms">community produces meaning for itself, “the ="trms">system that produces meaning” ='lgc'>==> “we” (="trms">community's raison d'etre)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[humanism is='lgc'>] arbitrary, auto-productive, and all but tautological


='lgc'>{every political/philosophical movement='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. rejected bourgeois humanism as insufficient, egotistical, and corrupt
="lstsrd">2. claimed for itself a privileged access to the dignity of man
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">Geroulanos='lgc'>='lgc'>--> structure of a ='strcls'>*rejection of mainstream thought and policy='strcls'>* for not taking into account (and hence devaluing) the goals of one's ="trms">anthropo-theologico-political commitment

="large lg1" stl="font-size:115%"> wreckage of WWII ='lgc'>==> man could not find meaning either in faith or in his own knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge and construction of the ="trms">world

_...dive into the depths of human solitude and suffering


(like existentialism and the Western ="ppl">Marxist tradition,) human ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights came to operate as a “humanism from below” ='lgc'>=/= generic and top-down humanisms (='lgc'>~ monopoly of violence that states held over their individual subjects)

(="ppl">Geroulanos not arguing that antihumanism was the driving force or the secret heart of intellectual movements and philosophies, nor claiming that it was a single movement, concept, idea, or trend; rather) antihumanism is what emerged from, shaped, and configured a major matrix of concerns


problem with secular humanist utopias ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> forging of a ‘new man’ through the mobilization of a ="trms">specific a ="trms">priori de="trms">finition of man required (both)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•man's divinization خداسازى
="lsts lst1">•man's purge پاکسازى

essentia="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list de="trms">finitions of man ='lgc'>==> biologistic, ="trms">scientistic, political, ="trms">religious, mora="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list projects ='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•lay claim on universality
="lsts lst1">•="trms">prioritize themselves over any such universality

ideologies continue to disguise a ='strcls'>*politics of the will='strcls'>* as a universalism

antihumanism='lgc'> = antiredemptive, antimora="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list, antimessianist ="trms">worldview

='lgc'>+ proliferation of ="trms">tropes ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> dooming contemporary man to an existence without meaning or future='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•last man (="ppl">Nietzsche, Camus, ="ppl">Blanchot)
="lsts lst1">•death of Man (Malraux, Kojeve, ="ppl">Blanchot, ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault)
="lsts lst1">•devirilization of man (Kojeve, ="ppl">Bataille, Queneau)
="lsts lst1">•terror (Marlaux, ="ppl">Bataille, Kojeve, ="ppl">Merleau-Ponty)
="lsts lst1">•

Kojeve and Jean Wahl ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> antifoundational realism ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> new ="trms">anthropology

antihumanism
a precondition of thought
a fluid matrix of ideas
a philosophical attitude

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Malraux's (="trms">literary-="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical pursuits ='lgc'>[echoes ="ppl">Nietzsche ='lgc'>+ intellectual Left='lgc'>]) ="trms">heritage to us (to artists)='lgc'>: the alternative to bourgeois individualism ='lgc'>[can be achieved='lgc'>] through commitment to a justice based on a quasi-="ppl">Marxist notion of human dignity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ='strcls'>*uprooted, cultured, and powerless individual='strcls'>* who struggled against the nation-driven, ="trms">science-executed destruction wrought by (arid and morally bankrupt) ="trms">modern warfare ='lgc'>[='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to forensic architecture, ="nms">apass='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (='thdf'>the idea that death of man can be averted through) ='strcls'>***a recognition of the heroism of the resistance='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>+ turn to human creativity

how i have used a non-western voice (“i am from outside the west”) to provide for myself an escape from political ="trms">categorization ='lgc'>+ claiming the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of an insider and enjoying the analytical clarity of distance ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> i make claims both ='strcls'>*expertise in='strcls'>* and cool-headed ='strcls'>*distance from='strcls'>* the essence of europe

(="trms">technique of) epistolary exchange


(to think of ="ppl">Kantian ="trms">cosmopolitanism a) a genuine model for commitment ='lgc'>=/= outdated illusion

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

research ="trms">method (a ="trms">heritage of surrealism='lgc'>:) exquisite corpse ="trms">technique ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (unpre="trms">dictable and) innocent inventiveness

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

for ="ppl">Sohrevardi and ="ppl">Avicenna='lgc'>: ="trms">nature='lgc'> = chah چاه shahr gheyravan (="trms">material of ="trms">nature/="trms">world='lgc'>: ghir قیر) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> zolmatkade ظلمت کده 

='at'>#comparative ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading of stranded
ghorbat gharbia ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Crusoe

="lsts lst1">•daryaye sabz دریای سبز  (green sea)='lgc'> = donyaye mahsusat دنیای محسوسات (="trms">phenomenological ="trms">world)
="lsts lst1">•دایه daye='lgc'> = nafse nabati (vegetal self)- khahar sister='lgc'> = alame made عالم ماده (="nms">hayula هیولا) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (you should) wrap it in azab عذاب
="lsts lst1">•woman='lgc'> = shahvani شهوانی carnal, pas-mandani پسماندنی (the one who stays, Lot's wife leaving the catastrophic city ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= mashmul-e azab مشمول عذاب) ='lgc'>=/= salek سالک ="trms">wonderer='lgc'>==> ba shahvat nemitavan soluk kard ='lgc'>=/= queer mysticism
="lsts lst1">•maghak مغاک ghaar chah قعر چاه (where abe hayat is آب حیات ='lgc'>=/= abe heyvan آب حیوان)='lgc'> = riazat ریاضت

from the spiritual point of view we are always at the bottom of the pit


="brkr">

="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid bodies
http://download.autodesk.com/global/docs/maya2014/en_us/index.html='qstn'>?=contextId=BULLETNODES
A ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid body is a polygonal or NURBS surface converted to an unyielding shape. Unlike conventional surfaces, ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid bodies collide rather than pass through each other during animation. To animate ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid body motion, you use fields, keys, expressions, ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid body constraints, or collisions with particles.
Maya has two kinds of ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid bodies='lgc'>--active and passive. An active ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid body reacts to dynamics='lgc'>--fields, collisions, and springs='lgc'>--not to keys. A passive ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid body can have active ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid bodies collide with it. You can key its ="trms">Translate and Rotate attributes, but dynamics have no effect on it.



notes on The ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">Rigid Bodies / (="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics of 3D)
the simulacrum / ideal / image ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Plato
mystic ="trms">geometry ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Pythagoras (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mathematization of the real, real ‘is’ math)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what does it mean to perform 3D for these two thinkers='qstn'>?

fire simulation in Maya ='lgc'>='lgc'><='lgc'>--> cotton touching fire in Islamic philosophy

(<)>  ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{
() manifest image ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> shader/topology/raytracing
<> underlying (="trms">scientific='qstn'>?) image ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> C='lgc'>+='lgc'>+ / physics engine / object oriented programming

the mode of production in current 3D-biz creates a ="trms">sort of cultural collateral or collateral culture (term by ="ppl">Lazzarato). 3D practices are arising as series of activities, not recognized as “work,” rather involved in defining and fixing artistic/cultural standards, tastes, norms, and strategically public opinion.
“is this real or fake='qstn'>?” (you have to click)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when the productive mediation is smashed to pieces and replaced by this ="trms">question.
either it is ‘made’ or ‘real’
='lgc'>[structural imposibility, a double bind, ...='lgc'>]
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the image-warrior who violently asks us to choose between the visible and the invisible
( ='lgc'><-)='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>--(='lgc'>-> )

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='thdf'>the notion of “general purpose toolkit”
synthesis, patches,
environment ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> media
="trms">interface ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> physical
="trms">dataflow programming, rapid prototyping, indeterministic machine paradigms,
one-dimensional array of values
telemetry (duri-sanj دوری سنج)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

an evange="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list builds a monument
softimage monument
virtual='qstn'>?



movement and stillness in houdini='qstn'>?
who the 3d software, as an ="trms">ontological device to recreate and study and understand being, is devided or made-up='qstn'>? the presebce of ='thdf'>the notion of movement in it and essence. what is movement and apparition='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[we can have a workshop that teaches houdini just through movement. or a non-movement approuch to 3D making.='lgc'>]


nonre="trms">presentational maya
="trms">epistemology and cognitive approuch to space and ="trms">matter

="trms">ontology of ="trms">matter in maya

="trms">worlding in autodesk industry (look at the trailers, tutorials, and so on.)
="trms">historical view='qstn'>?


i see maya and other 3D apps as visualization ="trms">technologies en="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listed as ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors by ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway and as ="trms">languages that actively ="trms">intertwine in the production of ="trms">literary value


="large lg14" stl="font-size:126%"> friction, forms of masks (shaders='qstn'>?), and play, and the dance of Dis-tanz
the separations and partings
nearness


transforming and transformative ="trms">agencies

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

“="trms">matter refers to the ="trms">materiality/="trms">materialization of ="trms">phenomena” (="ppl">="ppl">Barad)
="prgrph">-let's look at my 3D-related practices again and investigate their ="trms">ontological implications and rework how ="trms">matter is defined, ='lgc'>[="trms">matter, force, ="trms">interdependency, appearance,,, ="trms">phenomena, meaning,='lgc'>] ="ppl">Delanda-='lgc'>[intensification, ="trms">articulation, flow-of,='lgc'>]


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='at'>#="frds scrmbld">Femke workshop='lgc'>: on ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigging and skinning, ="trms">writing ="trms">stories cultivating creation and creatures before their enrollment in George Lucas film, speculating on the inorganic skeletal ="trms">animacies

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%"> (Brey > ="ppl">="ppl">Ihde='lgc'>:) ='lgc'>[="trms">technology:='lgc'>] a special class of artifacts (='thdf'>for example telescopes, probes, hearing aids, etc) that are capable of engaging in ‘="trms">symbiotic’ ="trms">relationships with the human body. ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] means through which the environment is experienced and acted on.


essential ambiguity of ="trms">technology / of ="trms">material human-="trms">technology ="trms">relations

hermeneutic fluency (and the special enigma) of the connection between text and ="trms">world

="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%"> ='strcls'>*="trms">bird's-eye='lgc'>=='qstn'>?/!='lgc'>~navigational='lgc'>='lgc'>~/='qstn'>?=.'='lgc'><-="trms">phenomenological
='lgc'>[...in front of the open (blank) page (of the ="trms">book) (we teach ="trms">children to take the) ="trms">position of the industria="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list, the ="trms"nttrm="disturban">urban planner, or the ="ppl">Cartesian philosopher ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> outside the page is outside and inside the page is inside ='lgc'>]='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Eunkyung's scriptural enterprise ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Derridean proper space of ="trms">writing
="prgrph">-the panopticon as observing ="trms">instrument for human ="trms">sciences is embeded in the page of the ="trms">book we open. part of this tradition ='lgc'>=/= first person shooter

(="ppl">="ppl">Ihde on) game-bodies='lgc'>: (on multistability ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ‘modes of navigation’ ='lgc'>[macro ="trms">phenomenological conditions, modeling observational possibilities, ='lgc'>]='lgc'>:
='lgc'>[1='lgc'>]- third person (pretended) overhead view looking down a map-like ="trms">world and plotting your course, one says “I go to X.” he calls it “the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="trms">position” (usually a western navigator) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> using ="trms">instrumental mediations to ="trms">translate this (overhead) ="trms">position, star patterns are with the north star
='lgc'>[2='lgc'>]- first person shooter, take your body as stable ="trms">position, one says='lgc'>: “X is coming to me.” (usually a south pacific navigator) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="trms">phenomena as ="trms">instruments, dynamic motion of star patterns are without the north star
='lgc'>[3='lgc'>]-



every major culture/civilization watches the ='strcls'>*movements of heaven='strcls'>*
="trms">technologies of temporality, lunar calendars (mostly migratory or non-agricultural people who were into smaller cycles) and solar calendars (people who were into lager cycles), knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of repeated patterns of environmental ="trms">phenomena
from stonehenge ='lgc'>[= stabilizer of perception, ='at'>#stone telling the movement of heavens;='lgc'>] to chip (, devices to record cycles) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">techno="trms">science has changed (="trms">phenomenologically merely) in scale
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>] ="trms">science is always ="trms">science-mediated-through-="trms">instrument ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> regarding ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>: ='at'>#model is the principal ="trms">instrument of (="trms">modern) ="trms">science.='lgc'>]='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> am I in which model-shift='qstn'>? (how='qstn'>? and why='qstn'>?)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•idealized models ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>-> my “art"='lgc'>] (='lgc'><='lgc'>--)to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> heuristic models ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>-> my ="trms">lectures='lgc'>] ='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•computational models ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>-> my ="trms">CG period='lgc'>] (='lgc'><='lgc'>--)to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">phenomenological models ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>-> my ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>] ='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•fanta[...]