[...]sy models ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> my ='qstn'>?='lgc'>] (='lgc'><='lgc'>--)to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> theoretical models ='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•re="trms">presentational models ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= my images='qstn'>?='lgc'>] (='lgc'><='lgc'>--)to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">epistemological models ='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

like the blind man's cane or probe, means through which the environment is perceived and acted on, how is the 3D computer simulations an ="trms">embodiment ="trms">relation='qstn'>? what are the (dis)="trms">embodied habituations of the hacker='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> philosophy of action ='lgc'>: how 3D work as an (dis)="trms">embodied artifact change our ="trms">relation to the ="trms">world='qstn'>? or, which ="trms">world is experienced as perceived through ="trms">embodied artifact of the 3D='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•re="trms">presentations of the location
="lsts lst1">•="trms">question of orientation
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">epistemological studies of ="trms">scientific ="trms">instrumentation

(="ppl">Feenberg, passivity missing in ="ppl">="ppl">Ihde)
(my own ="trms">interest in shyness and the) passive dimensions of body='lgc'>--lived experience of being the object of action='strcls'>***

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%"> ="ppl">Feenberg (reflecting on medical ="trms">situations forward='lgc'>:) we live our body not only as actors in the ="trms">world, but also as beings who invite action on our bodies by others
dependent body ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> highly ="trms">technologized experience

="trms">instrumentalized status of ="trms">modernism, in which the ‘dependent body’ belongs to ="trms">childhood
purified “humans” ='lgc'>: the subject distinguished from its ="trms">instrumentalities

sex='lgc'>: construction of the dependent subjectivized bodies
(="ppl">Sartre ='and'>& ="ppl">Merleau-Ponty='lgc'>:) person becomes a thing in the ="trms">world of the other

lived-body ='lgc'>=/= body ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> also the concern of ="ppl">I="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigaray and ="ppl">Butler='lgc'>]
(this is ="ppl">Husserl's Körper and Leib)
='lgc'>~ machine-infused ="trms">neuro-physical body
="lsts lst2">◦kin="trms">aesthetic sensations
="lsts lst2">◦="trms">presentational sensations
="lsts lst2">◦“="trms">internal” perception
="lsts lst2">◦“subject” -body
="lsts lst2">◦organ of perception / organ of action /
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (identity of the ego ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) the (existentia="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list visua="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list and strange) idea of='lgc'>: “I am my body"='lgc'>--body in terms of “I can” ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> self-movement
(="trms">intra-action ='lgc'>=/= that sensations are freestanding complexes and ="trms">internally ="trms">differentiated entities that can be identified and studied “before” the action)
='strcls'>*perception (is an act='lgc'>:) “animating” the ="trms">data of sensation (='qstn'>?)

the extended body signifies itself through ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= acts through='lgc'>] the ="trms">technical mediation

the impersonal and atomizing (commonplace) as="trms">sociations with ='thdf'>the notion of dis="trms">embodiment ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>the idea that in online involvement ="trms">relations are abridged and trivialized, that there is a lack of commitment and risk, and moral engagement is impossible, and so on.

='strcls'>*what would be a ="trms">situated account of the (lived-)body in ="trms">CG='qstn'>?

“the ringing of the cell phone that embarrasses us in the middle of a ="trms">lecture” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> extended body

plasticity and poly="trms">morphism of our bodies (online) ='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Ihde='lgc'>]

programmers working in other programmers’ works (='lgc'>--not ="trms">imaginative engagement with the other, rather) ='lgc'>--through='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">interfaces and ="trms">folds in ="trms">interpretation ='lgc'>{tutorial voices, screen videos, scripts, help files, layers of ="trms">codes and tools on each other, nested ="trms">folders on one's own computer, named ="trms">categories by oneself, horde of text files and renders, etc='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> these are (en-/de-)crypting extended bodies constructed of ="trms">language
subjectively constructed ="trms">phenomenon of the ="trms">communed ="trms">fold ="trms">interpreted ='lgc'>: the 3D computer programm
(='lgc'>=/= romantic refusal of all mediation)

="large lg1" stl="font-size:113%"> ="prgrph">-what is the ="trms">nature of the ="trms">technology involved in ="trms">CG='qstn'>?

="lsts lst1">•what is the source of the somatic sense of place, if not the body (since ="trms">Greeks) and ="trms">animality (since ="ppl">Deleuze ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">Guattari), in the case of ="trms">CG='qstn'>? ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{the way a good farmer will pick up soil and feel the dirt in his hands='lgc'>}
(="trms">Greek word) ‘soma’ refers to a corpse (in ="ppl">Homer,) not a living body (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'>#lived-body)
Neither the living body as an entity nor the Mind as an entity had a name.
for ="ppl">Aristotle, ‘thinking’ part of the soul, had an existence from any connection to the body.
“to experience the ="trms">world is the very ="trms">nature of body inside out.” (="ppl">="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Christianson">Christian ="ppl">Hubert > John Schumacher)


a ="trms">community whose ="trms">members are aware of each others’ passive ="trms">presence is ="trms">different forms
(active ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">present)

these are issues of ="trms">social subject in a ="trms">technically mediated ="trms">world

to look at ="trms">CG ="trms">embodiment ="trms">relations='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">fold (="ppl">="ppl">Ihde)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">skill (="ppl">Merleau-Ponty)
="lsts lst1">•theory of affordance (="ppl">="ppl">Gibson)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">intra-action (="ppl">="ppl">Barad)
="lsts lst1">•detour (="ppl">="ppl">Latour)

(="ppl">Merleau-Ponty's) ‘body schema’ ='lgc'>: space of the body='lgc'> = 'space of ="trms">situation,’ orientation towards possible (not only existing) tasks ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> aspects of the external/virtual ="trms">world
body understood in terms of their ability to enter into one's projects ='lgc'>=/= spatial location
='lgc'>[what is the body schema of the hacker in ="trms">CG='qstn'>? (an external ="trms">world where there is no near or far.) what is experienced as their ="trms">Gestalt='qstn'>? which grasp is automatically localized='qstn'>? what are their ="nms">phantom limbs='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> body immediately known to self='lgc'>]


(body as the) ="trms">system of possible actions, a virtual body with its ="trms">phenomenal “place” defined by its task and ="trms">situation. “My body is wherever there is something to be done.”

kinaestheses, proprioception,

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

what ‘play’ does to ‘ego’='qstn'>?

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(='lgc'>[is for ="frds scrmbld">="frds scrmbld">Lilia (='qstn'>? like ="ppl">Wittgenstein) all ‘certainties'='lgc'>] grounded in the) certainty of the body
='lgc'>{pain ='lgc'>='lgc'><='lgc'>--> certainty='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> trauma ='lgc'>+ ="trms">memory

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> (="ppl">="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Christianson">Christian ="ppl">Hubert > ) Rudofsky “un="trms">fashionable human body” (='at'>#="trms">veil)

Thomas Friedman “The Golden Straitjacket”
="lsts lst1">•political-economic garment of globalization era ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Straitjacket
(Cold War era='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•Mao ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> suit
="lsts lst1">•Nehru ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> jacket
="lsts lst1">•Russian ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> fur
="lsts lst1">•
="lsts lst1">•Islam ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> hejab

(Tasavof='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{for which the body does not remain concrete and ="trms">material, and soul is ambiguous and poly="trms">morphic='lgc'>}, Pythagorean='lgc'>:) veli='lgc'>: soul can clothe itself in ="trms">different bodies ='lgc'>=/= (="ppl">Aristotle='lgc'>:) soul is the form of a particular living body ='lgc'>{ soul='lgc'> = organization of the body ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “..there seems to be no case in which the soul can act or be acted on without involving the body” ='lgc'>=/= (="ppl">Descartes='lgc'>:) soul='lgc'> = enlightened machine (='lgc'>='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? proper organization of the brain)


='strcls'>***The body is a special image ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">body image

body, the priveleged image, the ="trms">world of consiousness (through self-reference), the brain's primary frame of reference ='lgc'>[-constructed with libidinal intensity='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a map of ="trms">narcissistic investment='lgc'>] (='lgc'>=/= body without organs)
="lsts lst1">•condition of the subject's access to spatiality (of the ='lgc'>[numero-computationally='qstn'>?='lgc'>] built environment)
="lsts lst1">•anatomy is always “="trms">imaginary anatomy”
="lsts lst1">•the (body-)ego is a formation of ="nms">body image through primary ="trms">narcissim (in terms of Oedipus complex)
="lsts lst1">•="nms">body image also incorporate external objects (implements and ="trms">instruments ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> intimate, vital, even libidinally cathected parts of the body) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the “detachable” parts of the body='lgc'>: urine, faeces, saliva, sperm, blood, vomit, hair, nails, skin='lgc'>--all retain something of the cathexis and value of a body

="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%"> ="prgrph">-for ="ppl">Bergson='lgc'>: an image that one know from within by ="trms">affections, rather than from without by perceptions='lgc'>: body ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> “my body” is the center of actions ='lgc'>==births='lgc'>='lgc'>==> re="trms">presentation
="prgrph">-for ="ppl">Whitehead='lgc'>: “self-knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of our bodily event” ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (organic) conception of ="trms">nature
="prgrph">-masculinity='lgc'>: body subordinate to the mind ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=>='lgc'>{ body='lgc'>: site for feminist critique
="prgrph">-for contemporary feminism (="ppl">Grosz)='lgc'>: body is neither a biological nor a ="trms">sociological ="trms">category, but rather a point of overlap between physical, ="trms">symbolic, and ="trms">material conditions

the ideological re="trms">presentations of a “real” precultural body
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> idealized in terms of abstract ="trms">geometry, rendered primal in primates,,,='lgc'>]

“The theory of the body is al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready a theory of perception.” ="ppl">Merleau-Ponty

(in his studies on body, ="ppl">="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Christianson">Christian ="ppl">Hubert quotes John Schumacher quoting) James ="ppl">="ppl">Gibson='lgc'>: “The optical information to specify the self, in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding the head, body, arms, and hands, accompanies the optical information to specify the environment. The two sources of information coexist. The one could not exist without the other. When a man sees the ="trms">world, he sees his nose at the same time; or rather, the ="trms">world and his nose are both ="trms">specified and his awareness can shift....The ="trms">supposedly separate realms of the subjective and objective are actually only poles of attention.” (The ="trms">Ecological Approach to Visual Perception)


="large lg5" stl="font-size:131%"> ="trms">sensuality is co-making


rituals and ="trms">technologies are links between bodies and ="trms">societies
(="trms">social) ="trms">techniques for the inscription of locality into bodies
="trms">technology as an exteriorizati[...]