[...]avelees ='strcls'>*
in terms of co-="trms">presence, ="trms">interaction, ="trms">interlocking understandings and practices, and often within radically a="trms">symmetrical ="trms">relations of power


='strcls'>***strategies of innocence='strcls'>*** (constructed in ="trms">relation to older imperial ="trms">rhetorics of conquest)
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> main protagonist of the anti-conquest is a figure (="ppl">Pratt sometimes calls) the “seeing-man”='lgc'>: (an admittedly unfriendly label for) the white male subject of European landscape discourse='lgc'>--he whose imperial eyes passively look out and possess


the idioms of ="trms">travel and exploration

="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%">
two processes in Northern Europe (“planetary consciousness”)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•the emergence of ="trms">natural ="trms">history as a structure of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="lsts lst1">•the turn toward ="trms">interior exploration
='lgc'>+
="lsts lst1">•Bourgeois forms of subjectivity consolidated themselves
="lsts lst1">•new territorial phase of capitalism propelled by se="trms"nttrm="search">arches for raw ="trms">materials began
="lsts lst1">•coastal trade extended inland
="lsts lst1">•


ways of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading and focusing ="trms">rhetorical analysis

="large lg1" stl="font-size:110%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Brancaforte='lgc'>]

word ='lgc'>+ image
art ='lgc'>+ ="trms">science
visual ='lgc'>+ discursive

the reality that he ='lgc'>[="ppl">Olearius='lgc'>] has experienced

="ppl">Conley='lgc'>: “the mass of textual ="trms">material that accompanies single-sheet or atlas maps tends to reveal its ideological perspective in the gaps between a silent, spatial, schematic rendering of an area (in visual form) and a voluble ='lgc'>[por harf پر‌حرف='lgc'>], copious, emphatic, printed discourse that strives to tell of the invisible ="trms">history that the image cannot put into words”

="trms">questions of
="lsts lst1">•="trms">authorship
="lsts lst1">•political power
="lsts lst1">•intellectual influence


Meerwunder, exotic curiosities from the sea


“we were about a gun-shot's distance”

in the age of incipient European colonia="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list expansion

a truly Baroque (bestseller) work, Vermehrte Newe Beschreibung der Muscowitischen and Persischen Reyse
(in terms of Oriental drama)
erudition (fazl فضل) ='lgc'>+ adventure ='lgc'>}='lgc'>-> in ="trms">narrative
="lsts lst1">•it is Adventure Time




proto-ethnography
acquire eyewitness information about a relatively unknown part of the ="trms">world
="prgrph">-(with ="ppl">Olearius's style we can hear) ethnography's mantra='lgc'>: “="trms">writing from the ground” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> attention to the shakenness of ="trms">difference (encountered or ="trms">imagined) ='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Stewart bringing my attention to the ="trms">writing ="trms">affect:='lgc'>] “ground” sends people bouncing, takes place as a threshold, hits the senses as a set of provocations. “="trms">Writing ="trms">matters if objects of analysis are to be understood as emergent forms with qualities, intensities, and ="trms">trajectories that can be described or evoked. ="trms">Writing is not epi="trms">phenomenal to thought but its medium. As it sidles up to ="trms">worlds, disparate and incommensurate things throw themselves together.” (="ppl">="ppl">Stewart 2012)
(the ground of ="nms">Iran on which ="ppl">Olearius stands cannot be summarized in a ="trms">literalized description, under the spell of a kind of cartographic shorthand ='lgc'>[tond-nevisi تند نويسى، مختصر نويسى='lgc'>], into a strangely idea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list paradigm that ="trms">imagines the things of the ="trms">world)
='strcls'>*="trms">writing can be='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•the practice of ="trms">writing ourselves into our ="trms">worlds as emergent and disparate ensembles ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> speculative concept of ‘="trms">worlding.’ ='lgc'>[to consider our='lgc'>] ="trms">writing as an inscription that configures the spaces of form and event in daily living
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Stewart slowed ethnographic practice='lgc'>: Why does ="trms">writing ="trms">matter in ethnography='qstn'>? How do forms of ="trms">writing change cultural theory='qstn'>? What ="trms">questions do forms of ="trms">writing raise about subjects and objects, forms of attention, the possibility of thinking through description='qstn'>? How do you describe a s="trms">cene, a character, an event, a ="trms">situation, a collective sensibility, a ="trms">difference, a ="trms">world='qstn'>? What does it mean to add ="trms">density and texture to ethnographic description='qstn'>? What can ethnography do='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•attuned to the ='strcls'>*forms and forces='strcls'>* un="trms">folding in s="trms">cenes and encounters ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">apparatus of conceptualization='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[pulled into (a tricky) alignment with (your field's) immanent concerns and with the concerns of the ="trms">worlds.='lgc'>] your (="trms">anthropological) objects have to “be walked around,” “approached from precise angles,” and seen as “states of being,” emergent, or suspended in potentiality, or collapsing, or residual, roosting on live ="trms">matter. ='strcls'>*culture ='lgc'>~= ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]the cultural='lgc'>: “a resonant and magnetizing field that registered in people and things living through events and conditions.” we try to describe sensibilities hitting people and ="trms">traversing ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] things='lgc'>:
="lsts lst2">◦bodies of thought
="lsts lst2">◦assemblages of infrastructures and institutions
="lsts lst2">◦new ="trms">ecologies
="lsts lst2">◦the rhythms of a daily living
="lsts lst2">◦the strangely connective tissue (produced by handheld devices and ="trms">social media)
 ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to ="trms">compose a register of the lived ="trms">affects of the things that took place in a ="trms">social-="trms">aesthetic-="trms">material-political ="trms">worlding ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= “to track the predetermined effects of abstractable logics and structures."='lgc'>] ='strcls'>***singularities='strcls'>*** take place as a series of precisions (across ="trms">sociality, ="trms">materiality, infrastructure, etc.) they are “events of,” emerged in the lived problematics of a ="trms">present ='lgc'>==> they could be brought to bear, deployed, maneuvered, suffered, or played with. ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affects='lgc'>: “registering of life as an assemblage of elements thrown, in the course of events, into a contact ="trms">aesthetic” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= the side effects of ="trms">systems, ="trms">codes, or ="trms">imaginaries (located in an elsewhere)='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•return (="trms">anthropology) to sense and sensation (='lgc'><== ="trms">affect) (="ppl">Olearius missed this, the “="trms">world” is proposed to him anchored in the consciousness of ='lgc'>[his='lgc'>] humanist subject or its ="trms">categories of thought. he misses ="nms">Iran as a ="trms">world charged with ="trms">affect, which is a prolific, mixed-use contact zone in an ongoing state of ="trms">transition that leaves ='lgc'>[="nms">Iranian='lgc'>] people “improvising with al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready-felts” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? Golestan ="ppl">Sa'di='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>-- ="trms">affect added an affirmative critique that registers surprise at what and how things happen.
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affective subject='lgc'>: “a person who waits in the company of others for things to arrive, one who learns to sense out what's coming and what forms it might take, one who aims to notice what crystallizes and how things ricochet and rebound in a ="trms">social-="trms">natural-="trms">aesthetic ="trms">ecology of com="trms">positions and thresholds of expressivity.” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “For the ="trms">affective subject, there is always the weight of the ="trms">world in what can be hoped for and what must be feared, in what flourishes and what ="trms">matters.”
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]Life='lgc'>: “an experiment of being in a ="trms">world, of finding ways to be in circuits of force and form, an aspiration to get something out of the alchemical transmogrifications of things that twist off on ="trms">trajectories far beyond humanist models of suffering or the usual hyperlegible registers of normativity and the state.” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “='lgc'>[Life='lgc'>] takes place in the inhuman ="trms">gestures of demons and angels, in the struggles of addicts and the rage of racists, in the endurance of the unbelievably injured or the oddly still curious.” (="ppl">="ppl">Stewart)
="lsts lst1">•a ="trms">world de="trms">literalized (with no endemic divide between a ="trms">naturalized given order and the exceptionalism of event)
="lsts lst1">•things, to become recognizable as something to be in or near, or else to oppose and resist
="lsts lst1">•(="trms">affect ='lgc'>--="ppl">Deleuze='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ="trms">differential ="trms">ontology='lgc'>: the prolific generativity of ="trms">difference and connection taking place in a field of possibilities. ="trms">affect studies now hitting='lgc'>:
="lsts lst2">◦="trms">anthropology
="lsts lst2">◦new ="trms">materialism
="lsts lst2">◦object-oriented ="trms">ontology
="lsts lst2">◦="trms">naturecultures
="lsts lst2">◦multi="trms">species work
="lsts lst2">◦="trms">science studies
="lsts lst2">◦new ="trms">ecologies
 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “the generativity and volatility of life as such, to its capacity to actively shift or harden into forms of peace or violence, pleasure and pain, collectivities and chaos.”
='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] it looks for ways to describe what precedes and exceeds the ="trms">categorical in the labors of living through ="trms">historical ="trms">presents.
='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] ="trms">affect-inflected ='lgc'>[study='lgc'>] leans into its descriptive objects with an eye to their hardenings into something recognizable (='lgc'>=/= what is often called ‘critical thinking’='lgc'>: habits of snapping, to catch the ="trms">world in a lie, dua="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list dead ends of ="trms">modernist humanist ="trms">social ="trms">science, independent logic of ="trms">data, the conviction that something is wrong ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">paranoid approaches to the ="trms">world)
="lsts lst1">•ethnographic ="trms">method of ="trms">mattering, ='lgc'>[why conceptuality might take radically ="trms">different forms in ="nms">Iran='qstn'>?='lgc'>] attention to the still un="trms">folding ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Foad's (mental habit of) describing the fixed object of destiny (of ="nms">Iran).='lgc'>] how to move in the manner of things slipping in and out of existence='qstn'>? the way a ="trms">world (in this case='lgc'>: ="nms">Iran) elaborates in prolific forms, taking off in directions. the ="nms">Iranian real is alchemical, ="trms">traveling in circuits of impact and reaction, in which things happen. we must train ourselves on an effort to descr[...]