[...]tewart 2012)
(the ground of ="nms">Iran on which ="ppl">Olearius stands cannot be summarized in a ="trms">literalized description, under the spell of a kind of cartographic shorthand ='lgc'>[tond-nevisi تند نويسى، مختصر نويسى='lgc'>], into a strangely idea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list paradigm that ="trms">imagines the things of the ="trms">world)
='strcls'>*="trms">writing can be='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•the practice of ="trms">writing ourselves into our ="trms">worlds as emergent and disparate ensembles ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> speculative concept of ‘="trms">worlding.’ ='lgc'>[to consider our='lgc'>] ="trms">writing as an inscription that configures the spaces of form and event in daily living
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Stewart slowed ethnographic practice='lgc'>: Why does ="trms">writing ="trms">matter in ethnography='qstn'>? How do forms of ="trms">writing change cultural theory='qstn'>? What ="trms">questions do forms of ="trms">writing raise about subjects and objects, forms of attention, the possibility of thinking through description='qstn'>? How do you describe a s="trms">cene, a character, an event, a ="trms">situation, a collective sensibility, a ="trms">difference, a ="trms">world='qstn'>? What does it mean to add ="trms">density and texture to ethnographic description='qstn'>? What can ethnography do='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•attuned to the ='strcls'>*forms and forces='strcls'>* un="trms">folding in s="trms">cenes and encounters ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">apparatus of conceptualization='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[pulled into (a tricky) alignment with (your field's) immanent concerns and with the concerns of the ="trms">worlds.='lgc'>] your (="trms">anthropological) objects have to “be walked around,” “approached from precise angles,” and seen as “states of being,” emergent, or suspended in potentiality, or collapsing, or residual, roosting on live ="trms">matter. ='strcls'>*culture ='lgc'>~= ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]the cultural='lgc'>: “a resonant and magnetizing field that registered in people and things living through events and conditions.” we try to describe sensibilities hitting people and ="trms">traversing ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] things='lgc'>:
="lsts lst2">◦bodies of thought
="lsts lst2">◦assemblages of infrastructures and institutions
="lsts lst2">◦new ="trms">ecologies
="lsts lst2">◦the rhythms of a daily living
="lsts lst2">◦the strangely connective tissue (produced by handheld devices and ="trms">social media)
 ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to ="trms">compose a register of the lived ="trms">affects of the things that took place in a ="trms">social-="trms">aesthetic-="trms">material-political ="trms">worlding ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= “to track the predetermined effects of abstractable logics and structures."='lgc'>] ='strcls'>***singularities='strcls'>*** take place as a series of precisions (across ="trms">sociality, ="trms">materiality, infrastructure, etc.) they are “events of,” emerged in the lived problematics of a ="trms">present ='lgc'>==> they could be brought to bear, deployed, maneuvered, suffered, or played with. ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affects='lgc'>: “registering of life as an assemblage of elements thrown, in the course of events, into a contact ="trms">aesthetic” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= the side effects of ="trms">systems, ="trms">codes, or ="trms">imaginaries (located in an elsewhere)='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•return (="trms">anthropology) to sense and sensation (='lgc'><== ="trms">affect) (="ppl">Olearius missed this, the “="trms">world” is proposed to him anchored in the consciousness of ='lgc'>[his='lgc'>] humanist subject or its ="trms">categories of thought. he misses ="nms">Iran as a ="trms">world charged with ="trms">affect, which is a prolific, mixed-use contact zone in an ongoing state of ="trms">transition that leaves ='lgc'>[="nms">Iranian='lgc'>] people “improvising with al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready-felts” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? Golestan ="ppl">Sa'di='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>-- ="trms">affect added an affirmative critique that registers surprise at what and how things happen.
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">affective subject='lgc'>: “a person who waits in the company of others for things to arrive, one who learns to sense out what's coming and what forms it might take, one who aims to notice what crystallizes and how things ricochet and rebound in a ="trms">social-="trms">natural-="trms">aesthetic ="trms">ecology of com="trms">positions and thresholds of expressivity.” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “For the ="trms">affective subject, there is always the weight of the ="trms">world in what can be hoped for and what must be feared, in what flourishes and what ="trms">matters.”
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]Life='lgc'>: “an experiment of being in a ="trms">world, of finding ways to be in circuits of force and form, an aspiration to get something out of the alchemical transmogrifications of things that twist off on ="trms">trajectories far beyond humanist models of suffering or the usual hyperlegible registers of normativity and the state.” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “='lgc'>[Life='lgc'>] takes place in the inhuman ="trms">gestures of demons and angels, in the struggles of addicts and the rage of racists, in the endurance of the unbelievably injured or the oddly still curious.” (="ppl">="ppl">Stewart)
="lsts lst1">•a ="trms">world de="trms">literalized (with no endemic divide between a ="trms">naturalized given order and the exceptionalism of event)
="lsts lst1">•things, to become recognizable as something to be in or near, or else to oppose and resist
="lsts lst1">•(="trms">affect ='lgc'>--="ppl">Deleuze='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) ="trms">differential ="trms">ontology='lgc'>: the prolific generativity of ="trms">difference and connection taking place in a field of possibilities. ="trms">affect studies now hitting='lgc'>:
="lsts lst2">◦="trms">anthropology
="lsts lst2">◦new ="trms">materialism
="lsts lst2">◦object-oriented ="trms">ontology
="lsts lst2">◦="trms">naturecultures
="lsts lst2">◦multi="trms">species work
="lsts lst2">◦="trms">science studies
="lsts lst2">◦new ="trms">ecologies
 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “the generativity and volatility of life as such, to its capacity to actively shift or harden into forms of peace or violence, pleasure and pain, collectivities and chaos.”
='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] it looks for ways to describe what precedes and exceeds the ="trms">categorical in the labors of living through ="trms">historical ="trms">presents.
='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] ="trms">affect-inflected ='lgc'>[study='lgc'>] leans into its descriptive objects with an eye to their hardenings into something recognizable (='lgc'>=/= what is often called ‘critical thinking’='lgc'>: habits of snapping, to catch the ="trms">world in a lie, dua="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list dead ends of ="trms">modernist humanist ="trms">social ="trms">science, independent logic of ="trms">data, the conviction that something is wrong ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">paranoid approaches to the ="trms">world)
="lsts lst1">•ethnographic ="trms">method of ="trms">mattering, ='lgc'>[why conceptuality might take radically ="trms">different forms in ="nms">Iran='qstn'>?='lgc'>] attention to the still un="trms">folding ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="frds scrmbld">Foad's (mental habit of) describing the fixed object of destiny (of ="nms">Iran).='lgc'>] how to move in the manner of things slipping in and out of existence='qstn'>? the way a ="trms">world (in this case='lgc'>: ="nms">Iran) elaborates in prolific forms, taking off in directions. the ="nms">Iranian real is alchemical, ="trms">traveling in circuits of impact and reaction, in which things happen. we must train ourselves on an effort to describe the iterations/durations/modes of “being taking place.”



="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%">
Said='lgc'>: “='thdf'>the idea of re="trms">presentation is a theatrical one='lgc'>: the Orient is the ="trms">stage on which the whole East is confined. on this ="trms">stage will appear figures whose role it is to re="trms">present the larger whole from which they emanate...”
='lgc'>[when we use “theater” in a cartographic sense it refers to the dynamic space where the “I” or the “self” sees itself engaged in a public space (of kin, of others, of economic and political forces)='lgc'>]

the theatrical arts='lgc'>: spoken work ='lgc'>+ visual ="trms">spectacle ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> rise of opera
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> rise of ="trms">natural ="trms">history='lgc'>]


observers of the ="trms">differences between their civilization and that of the Persians, their standards of ="trms">measure were those of the West='lgc'>:
Xenophon
Herodotus
Quintus Curtius Rufus
Strabo
Pausanias
Ammianus Marcellinus
Barnabas Brissonius
Pietro Bizzarri
Johannes de Laet
Thomas Herbert
Hans Schiltberger
Hans Christoph von Teufel
Stefan Kakasch
Anthony Jenkinson
Anthony and ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Robin,Robot,Robert,Robocop">Robert Sherley
Thomas Coryat
Pietro della Valle
Garcai de Silva y Figueroa
Jean Babtiste Tavernier
Raphael du Mans
="ppl">Olearius (1636)
Engelbert Kaempfer

a ="trms">Greek invented dichotomy='lgc'>:
(="trms">Greek) small democracies ='lgc'>=/= (Persian) powerful empire
modestia (cult of the simple and good) ='lgc'>=/= superbid (pride)
law ='lgc'>=/= monarch


‘conflict’ is a theme


Europe/Persia reasons for contact ="trms">according to Cambridge ="trms">History of ="nms">Iran='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1- ="trms">religious incentive (moharek محرک)
="lstsrd">2- both against the Ottoman Turks
="lstsrd">3- commercial incentive
="lstsrd">4- ="trms">travelers passed through Persia


Duke Frederick's commercial venture that would put the tiny territory on the map, as it were, and eliminate all its debts ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] with Adam ="ppl">Olearius chosen to chronicle the ="trms">mission as its official secretary
“Duke's stated aim in sending the embassy to Persia was to establish a trade route with Persia and obtain ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusive ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights to export silk from the area, thus squeezing out the other European competition, especially the Dutch”

his ="trms">methodology
(="ppl">Olearius's ="trms">citational mobilization) a typical Baroque ="trms">writer, he ="trms">cites classical and Renaissance sources copiously and compares them to each other, thus paying homage to the scholarly tradition
="lsts lst1">•="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list the main features of a subject under discussion
="lsts lst1">•quote classical and contemporary ="trms">authorities ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> elicit ="trms">different opinions
="lsts lst1">•

='strcls'>*correction of faulty source ="trms">material imperative='strcls'>*

Harvey's new theory of the circulation of blood

="ppl">Olearius='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•seasickness could be caused by motion of the waves
="lsts lst1">•“="trms">monsters” living along the Siberian coast are wrong
="lsts lst1">•

O[...]