[...]m)

(i want ="frds scrmbld">Hoda to make her ="trms">categorical labor harder, i want her to make ="trms">historically and ="trms">socially contextual analysis, not just take shortcuts towards ="trms">generalization predetermined by a ="trms">priori ="trms">categories (of ="nms">Iran, Islam, women), rather to begin with the ="trms">="trms">empirical reality)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%">
a new legible object of analysis (in ="trms">writing culture)='lgc'>: qualities, ="trms">trajectories, ="trms">aesthetics ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">writing became tactile and com="trms">positional, an attunement, a ="trms">response, “a vigilant protection of a ="trms">worlding” (="ppl">="ppl">Stewart)
='strcls'>*="trms">writing='lgc'> = a way of thinking='strcls'>*

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]precarity='lgc'>: register of the singularity of emergent ="trms">phenomena, the way that they accrete, accrue and wear out
(='lgc'>=/= recognizing self-identical objects, ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaculturally marked)

forms of perceiving (seeing, thinking) are themselves emergent

a ="trms">writing that hones attention to the way that a thing (like precarity, etc.) starts to take form as='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•a com="trms">position
="lsts lst1">•a recognition
="lsts lst1">•a sensibility
="lsts lst1">•some collection of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">materialities
="lsts lst1">•laws
="lsts lst1">•movements

obvious='lgc'>: totalizing dramatizations of the thing in itself

precarity can take the form of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•fraility (living in it and through it)
="lsts lst1">•a sea change
="lsts lst1">•a darkening atmosphere
="lsts lst1">•a hard fall
="lsts lst1">•the barely perceptible sense of a reprieve
="lsts lst1">•

ordinary things (='lgc'>=/= melodrama) they ="trms">matter because they shimmer precariously

...seasons magnetized to tones of voice and a quality of light

place (='lgc'>=/= immpasive corporeality) ='lgc'>: ="trms">affective charges='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•a mantel of redemption
="lsts lst1">•a glacier of impatience
="lsts lst1">•a high desert of ="trms">anxiety dissected by fault lines of rage
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--performed='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in ='strcls'>**little s="trms">cenes of recognition='strcls'>** (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “="trms">visceral complicity of those laying claim to a ="trms">composed tactility='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]” ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">naturalized order per se)

(="nms">Tehran's='qstn'>?) drawn curtains='lgc'>: physical shadow of a state of hardening, a rotting from the inside out
(...curtained people, they suck the) ='strcls'>*="trms">gestural sensory attachments of seeing and being seen='strcls'>* (into a ="trms">world in which things are dark)

precarity ='lgc'>==='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>==> intimacy (of people in place)

(in w="trms">inter with T-shirt and sandals) the townie body unfazed by the cold, endearing, a little heroic

an ="trms">imaginary ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a logic of some ="trms">sort ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> abstracted ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> become a thing in itself
or, a thing ="trms">simultaneously virtual and concrete
like the road, made not of dreams per se, but of laws, of ordinary practices, military surges, and construction ="trms">technologies

...intensities pass from body to body='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•human bodies
="lsts lst1">•="trms">animal bodies
="lsts lst1">•machine bodies
="lsts lst1">•bodies of thought
="lsts lst1">•eco="trms">systems
="lsts lst1">•="trms">visceralities and noumena
="lsts lst1">•="trms">histories
="lsts lst1">•the seamless habitus of super="trms">markets and credit cards
="lsts lst1">•

(="ppl">="ppl">Stewart's) precarity's form='lgc'>: com="trms">positional ='lgc'>+ decom="trms">positional

attachments, temps, ="trms">materialities, states of being

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]description='lgc'>: a ="trms">writing culture lodged in emergence, generativity, potentiality

things that come into form through an assemblage of ="trms">affects, routes, conditions, sensibilities, habits

what it means to meet the ="trms">world='lgc'>:
(="ppl">="ppl">Stewart) ='strcls'>*as a nearing='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= raw ="trms">material for exploitation='lgc'>]
(="ppl">Heidegger) as the ringing between ="trms">composing subjects and objects
(McCormack) felt as ways of going on in the ="trms">world
(="ppl">Deleuze) as increases and decreases, b="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rightening and darkening
() in a cartography distributed across a field of intensities and durations
='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= rush to incorporate them into a re="trms">presentational order of political or moral significance='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">epistemology='lgc'> = ="trms">stories of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge from before that somehow we are still living with now (='at'>#="trms">fable)
="ppl">Geroulanos ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ Ardrey ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Kubrick's african genesis ='lgc'>: “weapon fathered man”
="trms">technology ='lgc'>+ pre="trms">history (in postwar period)
“tool ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> man"='lgc'>}

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

knowing images
="trms">epistemic image ='lgc'>: knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge-based pictorial ="trms">gestures (in ='mywrk'>my work without) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> organization ='lgc'>+ collecting ='lgc'>+ de="trms">monstrating theories ='lgc'>+ ="trms">scientific tools ='lgc'>+ direct references to ="trms">natural objects
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> searchable ="trms">interfaces (='lgc'>+ desire for con="trms">densed information)
(='strcls'>**="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> searchable='strcls'>**)

(Apianus's early ="trms">modern cognitive horizon ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) eye='lgc'>: another organ used to calibrate settings
activated eye ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> new ="trms">="trms">empirical pursuits

my ="trms">epistemic images ='lgc'>: work of an image fetishist

="trms">bestiary='lgc'>: ="trms">animal character diagnosis

='lgc'>[horses='lgc'>]
(from) genre of taking care of the ="trms">animal='lgc'>: veterinary ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> chiromancy='lgc'>: profiling of the ="trms">animal conditioned through the serial ="trms">nature of ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> control)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Brancaforte
="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readings of the ="trms">apparatuses framing ="ppl">Olearius's ="trms">books
tradition of re="trms">presenting Persia in the West (Xenophon and Herodotus)
="trms">narrative elements of ="ppl">Olearius’ works remain largely unexamined


Brentjes

elm naghli علم نقلی (artistic research knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge) ='lgc'>=/= elm aghli علم عقلی (rationality)

(="trms">science) elm in ="nms">Iran ='lgc'><='lgc'>== (10th century ="trms">written in Persian='lgc'>:) limits of the ="trms">world ='lgc'>[hodud al-alam='lgc'>] ='lgc'>+ pharmacological medicine ='lgc'>+ (="trms">translated ='lgc'>~= adaptations of) astrology

10th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> gradual decline in ="trms">literacy in ="ppl">Arabic ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> Persian treaties on ="trms">sciences

rag-shenasi (knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of the pulse) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Avicenna

روضة المنجمین

rowzat (روضة to look) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~/=='qstn'>? nozhat نزهت='lgc'>] ='lgc'>~= garden ='lgc'>~= astrological site
="prgrph">-(="nms">iran) university garden ='lgc'>=/= (="trms">greek) university gymnasium


="trms">book='lgc'>: ex="trms">pository discourse (رساله توضیحی، تفسیری، نمایشی)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">poems on the subject
="lsts lst1">•تحسین و تمجید lengthy laudatory adjectives to describe the dedicatee='lgc'>:
="lsts lst2">◦patronage of the courts
="lsts lst2">◦the teaching circles
="lsts lst2">◦the family lineages of professions
="lsts lst2">◦the existence of “amateurs de ="trms">sciences” (the private individuals ="trms">interested in ="trms">science)
="lsts lst1">•anecdotes (="trms">historical or legendary)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">questions and answers
="lsts lst1">•observation on the usefulness and the excellence of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge in general


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

ethnography='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•set of ="trms">methods for knowing about ="trms">social ="trms">relations ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">storytelling='lgc'>] (='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>?)
="lsts lst1">•cultural-analytical scholarship ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> analysis='lgc'>]

ethnography='lgc'>: ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]ethnographic ="trms">stories='lgc'> = ="trms">generalizations that ="trms">intervene (='lgc'>~= ="trms">instruments that make ="trms">intervention possible ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- a knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge product in contemporary sci ='and'>& tech studies STS)

ethnography='lgc'>: ="trms">stories that have in them a capacity re="trms">present the ="trms">world in ways that are generative for the people and practices that the ="trms">stories are about ='lgc'>+ ="trms">authors (='lgc'>+ their peers ='lgc'>+ ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readers)

='strcls'>****(from) post="trms">modern concern about the ="trms">authority of the ="trms">author ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a concern about partiality and generative critique='strcls'>****
='at'>@="nms">apass ='at'>#feedback
(="ppl">Verran giving voice to what my concern and ="trms">interest is in artistic research environment)


the ="trms">question of how to re-="trms">present others (their diverse practices) on good faith='qstn'>? ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- moral
='lgc'>~~> the ='thdf'>bad idea of “good faith ='lgc'>=/= bad faith” ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> assume a moral high ground that we have no reason to argue in favor of

altering oneself to good faith='lgc'> = altering oneself to the possibility of double vision

(in ethnography) good faith='lgc'>: ="trms">writing ="trms">generalizing ="trms">stories that ="trms">intervene, because of the partiality of research and analysis (not despite of it)
="lsts lst1">•good faith analysis='lgc'>: having faith in it being possible to ="trms">write ="trms">stories that are generative for ='strcls'>*some of='strcls'>* the practices we study ='lgc'>+ for ='strcls'>*some of='strcls'>* our peers

(="trms">stories ='lgc'>--="ppl">Verran='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) two moments of ="trms">generalizing='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. ='strcls'>*onemany='strcls'>* form ='lgc'>==enable='lgc'>='lgc'>==> abstracting
="lstsrd">2. ='strcls'>*whole-parts='strcls'>* form ='lgc'>==bring='lgc'>='lgc'>==> a ="trms">situating moment
='lgc'>~=='lgc'>{ ="ppl">="ppl">Star Wars apocalyptic ="trms">stories (single vision) ='lgc'>+ lived ="trms">social bodily realities='lgc'> = (="ppl">="ppl">Harawayian) many-headed ="trms">monster ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='at'>#="nms">Tehran index

ethnographic research is always embedded in multi-stakeholder ="trms">situations

the ="ppl">Verran is proposing
='lgc'>=/= ="trms">writing ="trms">stories that ="trms">narrate what collaborators hope to hear
='lgc'>=/= hardening the ="trms">categories of the everyday

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]="trms">generalization='lgc'>: (performative) ways of making and negotiating ="trms">different realities

(Hinde ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) adequate ="trms">story='lgc'>: objects that ='strcls'>*find='strcls'>* audiences ='lgc'>~= ='strcls'>*pointing to='strcls'>* (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- performative) ='lgc'>~/= ='strcls'>*pointing for='strcls'>* (='lgc'><='lgc'>--="ppl">Verran='lgc'>-- invite them to do work to see their own ="trms">ontological commitments)
='at'>@apasa, research on performativity entailles when not to be performative

ethnographic ="trms">story='lgc'>: re-performance / re-="trms">presentation of some here-now
="lsts lst1">•description='lgc'>: ="trms">storytelling event


working indexically with an in="trms">finitely complex here-now

indexicality depends on posing a somewhere or something else that is real in a ="trms">different manner ='lgc'>~= performativity


="large lg14" stl="font-size:112%"> (Hacking='lgc'>:) we recognize the collective enactment of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge practices in devising re-="trms">presentations ='lgc'>--="ppl">Verran='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ethnographic ="trms">story='lgc'>: (first ans foremost) making reality (='lgc'>=/= ='thdf'>the idea that reality gives rise to re-="trms">presentations)

a ="trms">generalization='lgc'>: a unified text, ="trms">narrative, exemplifying and enacting a particular time and space ='lgc'>--con="trms">dense='lgc'>='lgc'>--> here-now
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> recognizing how ethnographic ="trms">stories deal with necessarily being just one of in="trms">finitely many possible ="trms">stories of a herenow

(John Law='lgc'>:) ethnography='lgc'>: a ="trms">method of assemblage ='lgc'>: enactment of ="trms">presence, manifest absence, and absence as otherness

='at'>#="nms">Tehran index
attending to indexes for herenow that embed two logics ="trms">generalization='lgc'>: one-many ='and'>& whole-parts
="lstsrd">1. one kind of ="trms">story embeds a logic of one-many ="trms">generalization ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">presents its here-now as an ='thdf'>example of something in general ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">story='lgc'> = evidence base of a general statement about human, ="trms">world, erc.='lgc'>]='lgc'>--Kwa='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*romantic='strcls'>*
="lstsrd">3. one kind of ="trms">story embeds a logic of whole-parts ="trms">generalization ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">presents its here-now by first building this ="trms">world ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">story='lgc'> = an emergent entity on a vague whole='lgc'>]='lgc'>--Kwa='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*baroque='strcls'>*

20th century ="trms">history of complexity theory

='strcls'>*romantic ='lgc'>=/= baroque ways of doing complexity='strcls'>*
='lgc'>--="ppl">Verran='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we should use both ="trms">simultaneously ='lgc'>~= ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway cyborg double vision

='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">="ppl">Latour's analysis of Ambassadors painting (='lgc'>~= illustration of an ethnographic ="trms">story)
="lsts lst1">•="trms">technique of ana="trms">morphosis='lgc'>: invite the viewer to shift their perspective ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*they are invited to do the work of recognizing the alternative logics of ="trms">generalization='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•="trms">agential ="trms">instrumentality
="lsts lst1">•dual logic='lgc'>: ambassadors ='and'>& skull
="lsts lst1">•skull/brownish object ='lgc'>--signal='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a ‘viewer’ must ‘lean over’ in order to see the ="trms">database (in ="ppl">Verran's example) as ="trms">authoritative ='and'>& as autonomous and ='strcls'>*capable of making new kinds of knower='strcls'>* emerge (worker, ="trms">storyteller, ethnographer)
="prgrph">-

my image assemblages are whole-part ="trms">generalizations, one-many pictures, vague whole with emergent parts

='at'>#workshop on training two modes of ="trms">generalization, use of drawing and image making, ="trms">writing ethnographic ="trms">stories


(artists typically make the mistake of making these two identical ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->)
='strcls'>*indicator ='lgc'>=/= outcome='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•indicator='lgc'>: for example you implement something
="lsts lst1">•outcome='lgc'>: a change in behavior (= accomplished indicator)

='strcls'>*one-many ="trms">generalization='strcls'>*
x is one of many possible ="trms">stories about X in general (='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Latour='lgc'>='lgc'>--> purification='lgc'>:) spacetime ="trms">specificities are transformed into general claims ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> abstracting
='lgc'>=/=
='strcls'>*whole-parts ="trms">generalization='strcls'>*
x is a participant on an assemblage where all actors are somehow emerging parts ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> one does not yet know what X is or may become (X remains a vague whole) (='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Latour='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">translation work='lgc'>:) working a number of herenows into the picture ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">situating

='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how to ="trms">write (ethnographic) ="trms">stories embedding the dual logic of ="trms">generalization='qstn'>?='lgc'> = ='strcls'>*how to arrive at a non-relativizing non-universalizing description that nevertheless works as a ="trms">generalization='qstn'>?='strcls'>*
='lgc'>==constitute='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">generalization='lgc'>: an irresolvable tension
='lgc'><='lgc'>-- ="trms">interventionist potentiel

="trms">narratives that allow both='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•information exchange (handling information correctly)
="lsts lst1">•unexpected cuts in information exchange (cutting the ="trms">world)


what is gained in the ="trms">interventionist potentiel ='lgc'>[of ="trms">stories; for ='thdf'>example of the skull in Holbein's ambassadeur, magic ="trms">database in ="ppl">Verran's ethnographic ="trms">story='lgc'>]='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-enabling double vision

="lsts lst1">•the worker has to be equally magical about her own monitoring repertoires (="nms">apass cloud attitudes)
="lsts lst1">•to ="trms">intervene the ideas of smooth and wellfunctioning development bureaucracy
="lsts lst1">•reflexivity='lgc'>: what the ethnographer sees as she is shifting her ="trms">position and beginning to focus on a ="trms">different (whole-parts) ="trms">generalization ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= simply a ="trms">matter of being transparent about one's analytical choices='lgc'>]

(="frds">Sina='lgc'>:)
="trms">storytelling ='lgc'>~= bullshiting
="trms">storytelling ='lgc'>~= analytical ="trms">social ="trms">science

deflating claims (for example we have never been ="trms">modern, etc.) do not afford possibilities for ="trms">intervening

="large lg14" stl="font-size:134%">
(why i use comparing ="trms">stories in my ="trms">lecture performances ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) the act of ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]comparing ='lgc'>: a central aspect of seeking to contain the dual logic in one ="trms">story ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Strathern > Holbraad ='and'>& Pedersen > ="ppl">Verran > ) peculiar intensification of the act of fieldwork


good faith analysis ='lgc'>: ="trms">stories that are explicit about the double vision through foregrounding within the ="trms">story a figure that enables ='strcls'>*switching='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•="trms">stories that never ="trms">intervene in a way that was ="trms">imagined (before the study was carried out)

(="ppl">Strathern's) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]partiality='lgc'> = incomplete ='lgc'>+ committed ='lgc'>: a description is always part of a whole, which can never be known as a totality, and it is political (biased)

="trms">lecture performance ='lgc'>~= brining the effect of a ="trms">story to life as ="trms">generalization ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> infra-="trms">ontological ='lgc'>+ ="trms">epistemological work

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Kwa

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]holism='lgc'>: ='thdf'>the ideal of ="trms">integrating all the workings of ="trms">nature into one whole

1950s ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a special ="trms">relationship between the holism and the computer (='thdf'>the idea that if ='thdf'>the ='thdf'>assumption of holism is fed into a computer model, the computer faithfully reproduces it)

early 20th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> notions of the complex unity of (living) ="trms">systems ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> romantic conceptions of ="trms">nature
='strcls'>*complexity='lgc'> = romantic holism ='lgc'>=/= reductionist='strcls'>*

="large lg14" stl="font-size:119%"> romantic tradition of complexity ='lgc'>: to see an underlying unity in a ="trms">world of heterogeneous objects and ="trms">phenomena (="ppl">Rousseau, Cuvier, last two thousands years, ='lgc'>[is ="trms">religion romantic='qstn'>?='lgc'>])


="large lg10" stl="font-size:131%"> romantic ="trms">scientist's moderate version of ="ppl">Kant's Copernican Revolution='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Rousseau
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Humboldt ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***to arrange the facts, not successively on the order in which they have ="trms">presented themselves, but ="trms">according to the ="trms">relations which they have between themselves='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~~> a ="trms">sort of ="trms">paranoia='lgc'>]
="lsts lst2">◦='thdf'>the idea that to see that ="ppl">Humboldt was able to see takes a “sensitive observer”
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Whitehead ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> physical ="trms">systems with endurance as the ="trms">measure of their stability
="lsts lst1">•Tansley ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> eco="trms">system ='lgc'>~= superorganism
="lsts lst1">•
='lgc'>=/= baroque (='lgc'>--Kwa='lgc'>='lgc'>--> neobaroque)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Leibniz ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> every bit of ="trms">matter can be conceived as a garden full of plants ='lgc'>: each drop of its bodily fluid is also such a garden ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>***it is the direction of looking that ="trms">matters ='strcls'>*** (mode of attention)
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Deleuze
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Whitehead
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Darwin
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Benjamin
="lsts lst1">•

="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%"> ="trms">bestiary='lgc'> = baroque ='lgc'>+ romantic

='strcls'>*romantic complexity (looks up) ='lgc'>=/= baroque complexity (looks down)='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•looking up='lgc'>: ="trms">integrate individuals (who appear to be a heterogeneous lot) at the ="trms">phenomenological level to a single entity at a higher level of organization ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (plants and ="trms">animals, individuals) are='strcls'>*functionality ="trms">integrated='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- my problem with ='thdf'>the notion of ="trms">community='lgc'>]
="lsts lst2">◦looking up to the ="trms">world of platonic forms ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- a process of abstraction
="lsts lst1">•looking down='lgc'>: a table of companions ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (plants and ="trms">animals, individuals) are ='strcls'>*cooperating='strcls'>*

(romantic conceptions of) ="trms">society as organism ='lgc'>=/= (baroque conception of) organism as ="trms">society


="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%"> (="trms">historic) baroque
="prgrph">-grand style of 17th century
="prgrph">-(insist on) strong ="trms">phenomenological realness ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">sensuous ="trms">materiality
="prgrph">-="trms">materiality flows out in many directions (='lgc'>=/= confined within) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> b="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurring “individual ='lgc'>=/= environment”
="prgrph">-inventiveness='lgc'>:
='lgc'>--music='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ability to produce lots of novel combinations out of a rather limited set of elements
='lgc'>--theater='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (logical development of plot ='lgc'>=/=) sequence of monologues and allegories ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> action


="ppl">Leibniz baroque philosophy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> monad='lgc'>: individuals not linked to form greater ="trms">systems (they don't even ="trms">communicate), but they ="trms">affect each other
='lgc'>--="ppl">Deleuze='lgc'>='lgc'>--> each monad had its context re="trms">presented inside itself (as ="trms">fold) ='lgc'>[more important the monad ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> richer its ="trms">world='lgc'>]


="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors of romanticism='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•organicism
="lsts lst1">•="trms">system ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (in graphical re="trms">presentation) depicted by connecting lives between constituent elem[...]