[...]a='lgc'>:)
="trms">storytelling ='lgc'>~= bullshiting
="trms">storytelling ='lgc'>~= analytical ="trms">social ="trms">science

deflating claims (for example we have never been ="trms">modern, etc.) do not afford possibilities for ="trms">intervening


(why i use comparing ="trms">stories in my ="trms">lecture performances ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->) the act of ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]comparing ='lgc'>: a central aspect of seeking to contain the dual logic in one ="trms">story ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">Strathern > Holbraad ='and'>& Pedersen > ="ppl">Verran > ) peculiar intensification of the act of fieldwork

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%">
good faith analysis ='lgc'>: ="trms">stories that are explicit about the double vision through foregrounding within the ="trms">story a figure that enables ='strcls'>*switching='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•="trms">stories that never ="trms">intervene in a way that was ="trms">imagined (before the study was carried out)

(="ppl">Strathern's) ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]partiality='lgc'> = incomplete ='lgc'>+ committed ='lgc'>: a description is always part of a whole, which can never be known as a totality, and it is political (biased)

="trms">lecture performance ='lgc'>~= brining the effect of a ="trms">story to life as ="trms">generalization ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> infra-="trms">ontological ='lgc'>+ ="trms">epistemological work

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

Kwa

='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]holism='lgc'>: ='thdf'>the ideal of ="trms">integrating all the workings of ="trms">nature into one whole

1950s ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a special ="trms">relationship between the holism and the computer (='thdf'>the idea that if ='thdf'>the ='thdf'>assumption of holism is fed into a computer model, the computer faithfully reproduces it)

early 20th century ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> notions of the complex unity of (living) ="trms">systems ='lgc'>==> romantic conceptions of ="trms">nature
='strcls'>*complexity='lgc'> = romantic holism ='lgc'>=/= reductionist='strcls'>*

romantic tradition of complexity ='lgc'>: to see an underlying unity in a ="trms">world of heterogeneous objects and ="trms">phenomena (="ppl">Rousseau, Cuvier, last two thousands years, ='lgc'>[is ="trms">religion romantic='qstn'>?='lgc'>])


romantic ="trms">scientist's moderate version of ="ppl">Kant's Copernican Revolution='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Rousseau
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Humboldt ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***to arrange the facts, not successively on the order in which they have ="trms">presented themselves, but ="trms">according to the ="trms">relations which they have between themselves='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~~> a ="trms">sort of ="trms">paranoia='lgc'>]
="lsts lst2">◦='thdf'>the idea that to see that ="ppl">Humboldt was able to see takes a “sensitive observer”
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Whitehead ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> physical ="trms">systems with endurance as the ="trms">measure of their stability
="lsts lst1">•Tansley ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> eco="trms">system ='lgc'>~= superorganism
="lsts lst1">•
='lgc'>=/= baroque (='lgc'>--Kwa='lgc'>='lgc'>--> neobaroque)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Leibniz ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> every bit of ="trms">matter can be conceived as a garden full of plants ='lgc'>: each drop of its bodily fluid is also such a garden ='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>***it is the direction of looking that ="trms">matters ='strcls'>*** (mode of attention)
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Deleuze
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Whitehead
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Darwin
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Benjamin
="lsts lst1">•

="trms">bestiary='lgc'> = baroque ='lgc'>+ romantic

='strcls'>*romantic complexity (looks up) ='lgc'>=/= baroque complexity (looks down)='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•looking up='lgc'>: ="trms">integrate individuals (who appear to be a heterogeneous lot) at the ="trms">phenomenological level to a single entity at a higher level of organization ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (plants and ="trms">animals, individuals) are='strcls'>*functionality ="trms">integrated='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- my problem with ='thdf'>the notion of ="trms">community='lgc'>]
="lsts lst2">◦looking up to the ="trms">world of platonic forms ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- a process of abstraction
="lsts lst1">•looking down='lgc'>: a table of companions ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (plants and ="trms">animals, individuals) are ='strcls'>*cooperating='strcls'>*

(romantic conceptions of) ="trms">society as organism ='lgc'>=/= (baroque conception of) organism as ="trms">society


(="trms">historic) baroque
="prgrph">-grand style of 17th century
="prgrph">-(insist on) strong ="trms">phenomenological realness ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">sensuous ="trms">materiality
="prgrph">-="trms">materiality flows out in many directions (='lgc'>=/= confined within) ='lgc'>==> b="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurring “individual ='lgc'>=/= environment”
="prgrph">-inventiveness='lgc'>:
='lgc'>--music='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ability to produce lots of novel combinations out of a rather limited set of elements
='lgc'>--theater='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (logical development of plot ='lgc'>=/=) sequence of monologues and allegories ='lgc'>==> action


="ppl">Leibniz baroque philosophy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> monad='lgc'>: individuals not linked to form greater ="trms">systems (they don't even ="trms">communicate), but they ="trms">affect each other
='lgc'>--="ppl">Deleuze='lgc'>='lgc'>--> each monad had its context re="trms">presented inside itself (as ="trms">fold) ='lgc'>[more important the monad ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> richer its ="trms">world='lgc'>]


="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors of romanticism='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•organicism
="lsts lst1">•="trms">system ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (in graphical re="trms">presentation) depicted by connecting lives between constituent elements (='lgc'>=/= monad)
="lsts lst1">•

="ppl">Whitehead ='lgc'>--="ppl">Deleuze='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a neobaroque philosopher ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> possibility of a chaotic side-by-side existence of ="trms">mutually ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusive realities
(baroque era) harmony='lgc'>: art of counterpoints (bringing together independent voices)


German baroque (Gryphius, Lohenstein) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">nature='lgc'> = ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]ruin='lgc'>: heap of highly significant fragments ='lgc'>=/= seamless web (='at'>@ERG website)
="lsts lst1">•fragment='lgc'>: independent individual things with a monadological structure (='lgc'>~/= post="trms">modern understanding of fragment)
="lsts lst1">•link (between them)='lgc'> = reciprocal reference ='lgc'>=/= connection
="lsts lst2">◦(references remain in their) ='strcls'>*allegorical immanence='strcls'>*
="lsts lst1">•

="large lg1" stl="font-size:130%">
="trms">World War II ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> ="trms">systems theories (attempt to explain the structure and behavior of complex objects


Charney ='lgc'>+ von Neumann
deterministic description of the atmosphere
“long-range forecasting”
computer-based metrology
='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*field='strcls'>* became the essence of atmospheric state (field ='lgc'>=/= structure, ="trms">phenomena such as cyclones, fronts, cyclogenesis, fr="trms">ontogenesis)
='lgc'><='lgc'>--Lorenz='lgc'>-- a given that the atmosphere is a single whole

romantic ='and'>& nonromantic ="ppl">Darwin
evolutionary theory
phylogenetic tree
="prgrph">-“war of ="trms">nature ='lgc'>==> higher ="trms">animals directly follow”
="prgrph">-individual organisms engage in various ="trms">interactions with each other ='lgc'>==> speciation

Tansley (fulfilling a romantic expectation with regard to complex ="trms">systems) ='lgc'>--1926='lgc'>='lgc'>--> maintenance of equilibrium by eco="trms">system ='lgc'>["life='lgc'> = equilibrium"='lgc'>]
='lgc'>=/= Schrödinger (showed that equilibrium is unfit as a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor for life) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> life='lgc'> = islands of low entropy (complex locations) in a sea of high entropy (of decreasing complexity)


Lokta
(evolution of) chemical ="trms">systems='lgc'> = general ="trms">systems


Patten
eco="trms">system ="trms">ecologist
“eco="trms">system='lgc'> = ="trms">natural control ="trms">system” ='lgc'>~= (single equilibrium simple cybernetic) ="trms">technical control device ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor of ='strcls'>*automatic machine='strcls'>* (taken ="trms">literally)
re="trms">presenting whole eco="trms">systems by (mathematized and fit for simulation on digital computers) models


1960s 70s ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">system ="trms">ecology
='lgc'>--="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lurck='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (romantic ="trms">trope of) ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous functionalism ='lgc'>[every little plant or insect had its place as a cog on a giant machinery='lgc'>]


Rene Thom
chemical reaction kinetics
biological ="trms">morphogenesis
catastrophe theory='lgc'>: slight change in a single variable of a ="trms">system can give rise to sharp discontinuous change
='lgc'>==> existence of multiple equilibria


="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%"> Slobodkin
game theory
management of ="trms">natural ="trms">systems


P="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigogine ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">="ppl">Stengers
brusselator device (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> strange attractor) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> behavior and evolution of complex ="trms">systems ='lgc'>--illustrate='lgc'>='lgc'>-->
="lsts lst1">•discontinuous development
="lsts lst1">•bifurcation (points at which the ="trms">system may go in either of two directions ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">system behaves as a whole)

local random fluctuations (around a mean) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bifurcation point ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the ="trms">system as a whole evolves to a new order
='lgc'>=/= cybernetic ="trms">system (control center)
='lgc'>=/= steam engine (governor)

="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%">
="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Robin,Robot,Robert,Robocop">Robert May
the more complex a ="trms">system is, the more likely it is that small fluctuations (will be just large enough) to be critical
complexity ='lgc'>==> unstability
='lgc'>~~='lgc'>~~> chaos theory


(for P="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigogine) fluctuation='lgc'>: essential condition for order of physical universe, life, civilization
='lgc'>[the most humble aspect of the behavior of ="trms">matter:='lgc'>] white noise ='lgc'>--(chaotic ="trms">phenomena)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> order ='lgc'>[on macro level='lgc'>]

turbulence ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- cannot be predicted (deterministic approach), but we have ="trms">="trms">empirical certainty that they will appear

="large lg5" stl="font-size:148%"> 55BC ='lgc'>--turbulence='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius’ De Rerum ="trms">natura (philosophical ="trms">poem on the ="trms">nature of things)
(his basic ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor of) ="trms">nature='lgc'>: hydrodynamic flow of particles in free fall, in swirls, in vortexes
‘small cause ='lgc'>==> disproportional nonlinearity’ ='lgc'>: ‘random collision of some falling atoms ='lgc'>==> constitution of ="trms">world’
='lgc'>--="ppl">Serres='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (="ppl">="ppl">Lucretius) heterodox tradition (='lgc'>=/= orthodoxe)


romantic ='and'>& baroque are ='strcls'>***discourse ='lgc'>=/= paradigm='strcls'>***
="lsts lst1">•discourse (available to draw from)
="lsts lst1">•paradigm (to succeed another paradigm) ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- to be careful as an artist, the fantasy of genesis='lgc'>]

="lsts lst1">•since the 19th century romantic complexity had been the more orthodox discourse
="lsts lst1">•since 1975 baroque complexity became the focus of ="trms">interest
='lgc'>}=[...]