[...]rating, assimilating
="lstsrd">2- stabilizing ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> fixing, delimiting, controlling
="lstsrd">3- bring into view ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">="trms">empirical, ="trms">technologies of re="trms">presentation, controlling
frame='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•useful models for viewing reality
="lsts lst1">•recursive lenses through which that ="trms">phenomenon is ="trms">measured and acted upon
climate change and new frames emerge side-by-side='lgc'>:
climate change as='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•externality
="lsts lst1">•superwicked problem
="lsts lst1">•="trms">anthropo="trms">cene
="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%">
='strcls'>**what if climate change is unframeable='qstn'>?='strcls'>** ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- art is good at dealing with this='lgc'>]
climate change qualities='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•unboundedness='lgc'>: hard to separate what is climate change and what is not
="lsts lst1">•incalculability='lgc'>: intotalizable effects ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> emergencies and ="trms">materialities that are beyond known forms of planning and organizing
="lsts lst1">•unthinkability='lgc'>: it escapes each time we try to capture it ="trms">="trms">empirically, organizationally, psychologically
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">questions that have no logical or ="trms">="trms">empirical answer ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">ontological='strcls'>* (they concern its ="trms">ontology) ='lgc'>~ we do not see its fundamental being
end of ="trms">="trms">empirical/logical='lgc'> = beginning of ="trms">ontological (secular)
='lgc'>=/=
end of ="trms">="trms">empirical/logical ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? beginning of eschatological (nonsecular)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">Campbell='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**="trms">ontologization of climate change='strcls'>**
='strcls'>*climate change='lgc'> = the ="trms">world we live in ='lgc'>=/= a problem within the ="trms">world='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]climate change='lgc'>: the absolute context that determines what is possible ='lgc'>+ what has replaced a previous ="trms">world
(i find Meillassoux ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">Campbell argumentation more convincing than ="ppl">="ppl">Morton's hyperobject)
climate change as “problem” (that can be framed), “thing”, “within the ="trms">world” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= the ="trms">world='lgc'>: generative context from where problems emerge ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> forms of organization without precedent='lgc'>] ='lgc'>==problem='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lstsrd">1. ="trms">epistemological assumptions (='lgc'>+ expectations ='lgc'>+ ="trms">responses)
="lstsrd">2. unable to encompass (the qualities of climate change)
="lstsrd">3. misrecognition of climate change
speculative rea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list idea of ="trms">world
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]speculative realism='lgc'>: a strategy for thinking, organizing, solving at the ='strcls'>*widest rational angle='lgc'>: a form of thinking and acting that is concerned with the fundamental structure of reality in its absolute and unconditioned form (='lgc'>=/= manifestations of ="trms">phenomena) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> to deliver ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical truths unto the ="trms">world without deforming them with the forceps انبر جراحى of one's own ="trms">epistemic ="trms">apparatus
(as) ="trms">ontological threat ='lgc'>==="ppl">Campbell='lgc'>='lgc'>==> escalation and absolutization of ethics (='strcls'>*that is necessary to aithentically occupy it='strcls'>*)
='at'>@="nms">apass='lgc'>: constant investigation of one's ="trms">epistemology (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">ontology) in artistic research
='lgc'>--="frds">Sina='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger of ="trms">ontologization...
='strcls'>**massively expansive vista of rationality='strcls'>** ='lgc'>=/= disavowing rationality
(the old philosophical idea of) the absolute ='lgc'>=/= equivocal status
bleak optimism='lgc'>: organizing without hope ='lgc'><='lgc'>== climate change has al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready happened
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how to die ='lgc'>: a creative form of foreclosure that unlocks a justice that cannot exist without realizing the ="trms">ontological dimensions of climate change
frame='lgc'>: general organizing device ='lgc'>='lgc'>==>
="lsts lst1">•define problems
="lsts lst1">•diagnose causes
="lsts lst1">•sug="trms">gest solutions
(their) argumentative strength ='lgc'>==influence='lgc'>='lgc'>==> organization
frame ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> define climate change ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> produce climate change ='lgc'>--through='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the work of='lgc'>:)
="lsts lst1">•problem-identification
="lsts lst1">•claim-making
="lsts lst1">•attribution-laying
="lsts lst1">•boundary delineation
="lsts lst1">•counter-framing
="lsts lst1">•bridging
="lsts lst1">•amplification
="lsts lst1">•constructing identity-forming ="trms">vocabularies and discourses
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>*alter an audience's ideological beliefs='strcls'>*
climate change ="trms">literature has been dominated by economics, (geo)engineering, legal theory/policy studies ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> solutions (to climate change) ='lgc'>--invoke='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">markets, ="trms">technologies, policies (with differing criteria about what constitutes legitimacy, ="trms">authority, efficacy) ='lgc'>}='lgc'><='lgc'>--="ppl">Campbell='lgc'>-- ='strcls'>*before they get a solution, the ="trms">phenomenon has al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready been ="trms">scientized, politicized, mediatized, organized='strcls'>*
indigenous framing of climate change
drawing from indigenous cultures in the hope that a deeper emotional maturity might lead to a deep engagement with the environment which ultimately bestows life ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> framed as an existential threat ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (="trms">question what it means to be) an ="trms">ecologically ="trms">interdependent ="trms">species with moral ="trms">agency ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">="frds scrmbld">Chloe2
eschatological cliche ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “existentially significant activities are no longer possible ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the loss of meaning” (='lgc'>=/= ="nms">Cinderella)
='lgc'>[='strcls'>*='lgc'>]frame, framing='lgc'>: en="trms">fold audiences into an enclosure that is conceptually accessible
='thdf'>for example
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*="trms">ecological ="trms">modernization='strcls'>* ='lgc'>: a frame for climate change that seems to enclose the grreatest number of diverse stakeholders ='lgc'>='lgc'>--- uses carbon as a way to engage diverse stakeholders, a centrifugal locus that is calculable, non-political, ="trms">scientific ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">presents opportunities for innovation ='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="ppl">Campbell='lgc'>='lgc'>--> short-term strategy='lgc'>: a reification process that transforms climate change into “the carbon problem” ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> production of carbon ="trms">markets that ironically serve as creative new modes of accumulation ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- reifies ="trms">ecological maladaptation
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*catastrophic framing='strcls'>* of climate change ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> backfires, moomerang effects, causing audiences to disbelieve the entire message
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*frame-bridging='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when two issues ostensibly ="trms">different are linked in complementariness in the same sphere as the concept in ="trms">question (='thdf'>for example emphasizing the ="trms">religious and moral dimensions of climate change ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> environment central to faith
="lsts lst1">•='strcls'>*emotional framing='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we are suffering from a deficiency of ='strcls'>*emotional knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='strcls'>* about climate change (='lgc'>=/= deficit of information) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> locus of problem moves to the psychological ="trms">affective realm ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> elevation of the problem to an existential threat or trauma ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (climate change becomes a factor in ='strcls'>*identity formation='strcls'>*) we become more ="trms">ecological in our cognition behaviour, ="trms">affect
="lsts lst2">◦managers in organizations perform complex ‘="trms">affect-based’ work to ="trms">translate the broader ="trms">social emotions of climate change into the ='strcls'>*local emotional landscape='strcls'>* ='lgc'>==establish='lgc'>='lgc'>==> new norms ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> alter the emotional salience of climate change (in the workplace) ='lgc'>[='lgc'><='lgc'>-- 26/06/2021 this has become the dominant framing in artistic research environments ='at'>@="nms">apass, ="frds scrmbld">Pierre, ="frds scrmbld">="frds scrmbld">Chloe2='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*(successful) frames='lgc'>: work through the ="trms">integration of the ="trms">phenomenon into a reality that is manageable='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Campbell)
focus on the sustainability of discourses that are ="trms">imaginable and thinkable and connectable with people's existing ="trms">world ='lgc'>=/= focus on the reality of the moving target
‘climate change’ politically more palatable مطبوع به ذائقه than ‘global warming’ in conservative circles
discursive evolution of climate change='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•1932 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> externality ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> economics
="lsts lst1">•1960 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> wicked problem ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> policy studies, public management
="lsts lst1">•1980 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> threat ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> public media
="lsts lst1">•1988 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> global warming ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> physical chemistry
="lsts lst1">•2000 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> contested debate ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">science
="lsts lst1">•1968 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> tragedy of the commons ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">ecological philosophy
="lsts lst2">◦collective action dilemma, common property dilemma, non-commitment ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">responsibility, transnational commons dilemma, ="trms">historical versus new emitters, fossil fuel lobby and corporate power ='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="trms">response='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ develop ="trms">techniques for more thorough understanding of ="trms">ecological ="trms">interdependencies, manage multi-stakeholder ="trms">interests, unite common goals in public bad game, transnational issue-spanning, ="trms">pragmatic incremental gains, address value-action gaps in individual ="trms">consumption regimes
="lsts lst1">•1990 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> risk ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mathematics
="lsts lst1">•1990 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> war ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> political economy
="lsts lst1">•1990 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> crisis ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">science
="lsts lst1">•1990 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> catastrophe ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mathematics (used ="trms">differently in public ="trms">imaginary)
="lsts lst2">◦“dnd of days”, worst-case scenario, complete ="trms">system collapse, extreme events, irreversible, non-calculative, non-gradual ='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="trms">response='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ use catastrophe framing to induce immediate action, fix temporal focus on visualization of the possible aftermath to prevent it Disrupt business-as-usual regimes, use urgency and fear to engage immediate action, emotional re-education, emergency planning
="lsts lst1">•2007 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> super wicked problem ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> policy studies
="lsts lst2">◦time is running out, those who cause the problem are also seeking to provide a solution, the central ="trms">authority needed to address it is weak or non-existent, current ="trms">responses discount the future irrationally, psychological short-termism ='lgc'>=/= long-termis ='lgc'>}='lgc'>--="trms">response='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ incentivize organizations, create path-dependent organizational ="trms">interventions, progressive incremental ="trms">trajectory, con="trms">sensus-building, small [...]