[...]arities and generalities (of logic, ethics, politics, ="trms">aesthetics, etc.) encounter can be both in="trms">finitly singular and general. that is a form of sug="trms">gestive work that can deal with the ="trms">specific as well. (think about ‘chicken’ as an anstract idea in our ="trms">semiotic ="trms">world and as an individual being in our ="trms">material ="trms">world)
="lsts lst1">•using ='thdf'>the notion of delinking (reminded by ="frds scrmbld">Juan) with ='mywrk'>my research on the ="trms">Book of ="trms">Wonders. going from parable-thinking ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">religious-thinking ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> poststructura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list-thinking ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">poetic-thinking ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> riddle-thinking ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> biological-thinking ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> deconstructionist-thinking ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ...
="lsts lst1">•this other universe is always at the beyond='lgc'>--the other ="trms">cosmos is a ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure (='qstn'>?)
="lsts lst1">•all cages have wheels
="lsts lst1">•boat, as an image for both construction and destruction
="lsts lst1">•i don't need to be alone in destroying the boat
="lsts lst1">•how to move the boat ='lgc'>=/= destination




="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> possible workshops for ="frds scrmbld">Einat's project='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•moonwalk dance
="lsts lst1">•="trms">database programing ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how to live well with ="trms">databases, not waging a quixotic war on ="trms">database designers. we must learn how to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read and understand ="trms">database early in elementary school. ="trms">databases are fundamental parts of our political ="trms">social ethical cultural processes...
="lsts lst1">•regular expression ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how computer programming ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reads and patterns text
="lsts lst1">•text-based ="trms">internet ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> cyberfeminism
="lsts lst1">•="trms">intervention in the digital hegemonies (digital ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> cultural ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ="trms">material) (changes to the built digital environments, possiblities of recon="trms">figuration ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> production of space, ="trms">articulations about ‘us’)
="lsts lst1">•what does it mean to look at a ="trms">code='qstn'>? (a critical introduction to computer programming for artists)
="lsts lst1">•How to implement a programming ="trms">language in (JavaScript='qstn'>?)='lgc'>--parsing, regexps, (http://lisperator.net/)
="lsts lst1">•teaching German with ="ppl">Holderlin's “Andenken” ="trms">poem
="lsts lst1">•to create a ='strcls'>*feast='strcls'>* (to celebrate is to become free of the habitual, becoming inhabitual. celebration is the tensional coming together of the unlikes ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> through which human beings and gods could meet and ="trms">greet. The festiveness that the celebration encourages constitutes the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal ="trms">Greeting. ='lgc'>[="ppl">Avital='lgc'>])


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

what i have beeing trying to mean by saying that i have been dependent on others to create spaces that a telling can happen, is actually a fundamnetal ellement of ="trms">storytelling='lgc'>: the ='strcls'>***="trms">community. i need and depend on ="trms">community in my tellings. (this has noting to do with the imperative of “="trms">communication” or having a “message”)
(is it what ="ppl">="ppl">Stengers calls to promote an “oikos”='qstn'>?)


='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Stengers='lgc'>]
“the ='strcls'>*predominance='strcls'>* of the ='strcls'>*concern for relevance='strcls'>* (-rabt-) builds up ="trms">memory and experience”

political ="trms">ecology ='lgc'>: there is NO knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge that is (both) relevant and detached
political ="trms">ecology ='lgc'>: relevance ='lgc'>+ attachment='lgc'> = knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge

art of ="trms">staging='lgc'> = designing a s="trms">cene

='lgc'>[the House TV series, the issue of the protagonist is='lgc'>] the distinguish between the figure of the expert and the figure of the diplomat.
='strcls'>*expert='lgc'>: ones whose practice is not threatend by the issue under discussion ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge='lgc'> = relevance
='strcls'>*diplomat='lgc'>: ones who provide a voice for those whose practice, mode of existence, (and what is offen called) identity are threatened by a decision. to cause the experts second thoughts. ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>~= decision
='lgc'>[this is core in ="trms">storytelling='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[then, i am political. i used to use the word embassador, but it means also ‘diplomat.’ ="trms">stories that can hold another ="trms">story hanging. ="frds">Sina's shy embassador ='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? ='lgc'>] (but what about the weak ones, the idiot, the one's who ‘rather not’ contribute to the political project='qstn'>?)
="prgrph">-diplomats are ="trms">situated='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[for ='strcls'>*="frds scrmbld">Lili this is also a delima, she is torn apart between her expert self and diplomat who ="trms">crafts relevance
diplomat='lgc'>--the relevance of feelings ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what is the knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge in the kiss='qstn'>? (the kiss that she rendered as ‘irrelevant’)='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[for me kiss is essentialy important. “it (everything) started with a kiss."='lgc'>]

universal knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>=/= relevant knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge


="large lg14" stl="font-size:127%"> ‘trust’ is one of many names for ="trms">love
“you can never be in="trms">different to the trust you inspire” (="ppl">="ppl">Stengers)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='at'>#workshop='lgc'>: “the magic of the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right word”
(against Sherlock Holmes)
(12-step recovery program for people suffering from) ad="trms">diction to the truth

(to energize the connections to the things that animate us.)

="lstsrd">1. gathering, basckets of concepts, objects, things, words, etc.
="lstsrd">2. excersises, physical to-dos (cleaning, cooking, sport, sawing, etc.) while telling (this is about removing the ="trms">codes of acting and re="trms">presentation process that ="trms">interupt the telling)
="lstsrd">3. everyday mundane talks, no ="trms">stage. ‘you’ in it. (is it a one-to-one mentoring='qstn'>?)
="lstsrd">4. convert into ="trms">language the objects from the basket, ="trms">write them down. since we are going to work with sign-="trms">language
="lstsrd">5. make the connections (probably together)
="lstsrd">6. special activities during the workshop='qstn'>? (cooking, drinking, etc.)
="lstsrd">7. ending of the workshop. what would be the closure='qstn'>? what do we build='qstn'>? how do we evaluate='qstn'>?


='lgc'>[what are you summoned by='qstn'>? ="trms">write about the person you see in the light of reverie='qstn'>? how to survive humanism='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='at'>#workshop, ="trms">fables
="trms">fable seen as a site where one ="trms">formulates concepts and ="trms">narratives that reorient one within one's own research practices
="prgrph">-(how can we) participate in shaping our objects of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">relational ="trms">="trms">empiricism)
="prgrph">-learn through participating in ="trms">different (though not fixed nor ="trms">mutually ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusive) ='strcls'>*micro="trms">worlds='strcls'>* ='lgc'>[micro="trms">world='lgc'>: a space where protocols and ="trms">="trms">equipments are standardized to facilitate the emergence and stabilization of new objects. (="ppl">="ppl">Kenney)='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-“banal and ordinary sites of getting on in collective life” (="ppl">Verran)
="prgrph">-bring your ‘found objects’ (objects, ="trms">categories, ="trms">stories, concepts, insights, ="trms">writing under influence, etc.) and put them in ‘telling’ (telling ="trms">stories about the lives of your found objects ='lgc'>=/= insisting on the solidity of our found objects='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--='lgc'>[solidity='lgc'> = stability ='lgc'>+ ="trms">authority='lgc'>] and in telling practices ='lgc'>=> (re)="trms">materializing your ="trms">="trms">empirical objects ='lgc'>=/= generating re="trms">liably-managed micro="trms">world)
="prgrph">-found objects are objects with which we inhabit ="trms">worlds (or micro="trms">worlds of our practices)
="prgrph">-(not claiming to occupy an) ="trms">ontological no-man's-land outside of the micro="trms">worlds ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> my frame is no more free of ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics than any other
="prgrph">-towards an ongoing untidy recursive theory ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> keeping our objects, concepts, and insights in a state of generative transformation
="prgrph">-which “="trms">affective economies” animate our own bodies as artist and as people='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-what feelings inform our works='qstn'>?

="large lg1" stl="font-size:129%"> staying with ="trms">linguistic ="trms">differences (in each of our ="trms">stories or praxiography) is a way of investigating the ="trms">ontological commitments embedded in ="trms">language.
="trms">ontological ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">worlding ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how ="trms">language participates in shaping our lived ="trms">worlds in some ways and not others.='strcls'>*** “it is not common for speakers of a ="trms">language to examine what type of ="trms">material objects their ="trms">language commits them to.” (="ppl">Verran)

solidity of found objects, in my case, the graphs and images i am making about ="nms">ajayeb ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the graphs now reiterate for me as rituals in ='mywrk'>my research micro="trms">world.
with these graphs i am trying ="trms">different ways of arranging space, time and ="trms">matter when speaking a ='strcls'>*sentence='strcls'>*. ...each ="trms">language figures space, time, and ="trms">matter into ="trms">different kinds of objects. in my ="trms">writing tools with ="nms">ajayeb, what type of ="trms">material objects my ="trms">language, or Hemedani or Qazwini's ="trms">language, commits us to='qstn'>? my graphs are “spatiotemporal particulars” and “="trms">sortal particulars”. trying to talk about ="trms">ontological assumptions embedded in the English (and any other) ="trms">language. the diagrams are ='strcls'>*="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs='strcls'>*. i am using ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigging instead of framework. ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> clever ="trms">technological ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs, are provisional constructions, setup for a ="trms">specific myth and dismantled after. sometimes old ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs are reused or repurposed for new ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs.
="prgrph">-resist peaceful ="trms">naturalization
="prgrph">-uncomfortable software
="prgrph">-building/creating ="trms">technologies as one way to do ="trms">ontological politics (in postcolonial context)
="prgrph">-my experiments with ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>:
 ="prgrph prgrph2">-(the d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger in using) computer software to archive ="nms">ajayeb's or ="nms">ajib knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge ='lgc'>=/= lively collective ="trms">memory tool
 ="prgrph prgrph2">-the software that is slick and seamless runs the risk of the digital media appear as ='strcls'>*self-sufficient re="trms">presentations='strcls'>* (='lgc'><='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> living context)
 ="prgrph prgrph2">-archived and frozen in time
="prgrph">-="trms">sorting operations

(if i continue with digital tech in ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="nms">ajayeb i have to ask) how the digitized ="nms">ajib knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge can resist appropriation and ="trms">translation into an idiom that will not sustain its ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics='strcls'>****
="lsts lst2">◦powerful ="trms">relational work that numbers (also='qstn'>?='lgc'> = ='lgc'>=/= ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>=> etc.) perform ='lgc'>-> “numbers are a particularly smooth and manipulable meaning-making tools. they hide their seams well. they are slick and trustworthy” (Porter) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> they are “="trms">materialized ="trms">relations” (how can we tell a ="trms">story of ="trms">relations that for example numbers/math ="trms">materialize='qstn'>?)
="lsts lst2">◦highlighting parts of ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>: as part of a ="trms">material ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading practice ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “highlighting” could easily be understood as ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor of dis="trms">embodied vision; highlighting is not about making things clear but about scribbling (bad-khat بدخط) as a mode of attention ='lgc'>=/= (="ppl">Descartes’) “="trms">natural light of reason”


='prcnt'>%report on ="trms">fables of objects ='at'>#workshop (22.02.2017 HWD ="nms">apass)='lgc'>: attention to the sense and feeling of disparity, dispersity, stability, ="trms">sublimity, ="trms">authority, epicness, weakness, severity, solidity, scale, (a)="trms">social connections, and tangibility in the character of the object of each participants in the ="trms">stories we wrote. where were active and passive qualities located='qstn'>? how were ="trms">agencies distributed='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin ="trms">story ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> evolution ="trms">story, ="trms">love ="trms">story ='lgc'>[the object falls in ="trms">love with...='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•daily ="trms">story
="lsts lst1">•="trms">beast feeding ="trms">story ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> training ="trms">story
evoking temporality of evolutionary time, face-to-face time, ="trms">historical time, tiny scale time,
 ="prgrph prgrph2">-each ="trms">story has a music, texture of colors, pattern of meaning and ="trms">affect
="lsts lst1">•bodyguard ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> fantastic creature invented to protect an organism (your “object”). this bodyguard can be organic, nonorganic, cyborg, any form, but always an ="trms">agent. tell us why/how this or that feature helps the bodyguard with its task
="lsts lst1">•generation ="trms">stories, describe and follow your object in three generations, its ="trms">child and grand="trms">child
="lsts lst1">•='lgc'>[for the second day or warm-up first day='qstn'>?='lgc'>] constraint based ="trms">writing='lgc'>: (="ppl">="ppl">Kenney > ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Christianson">Christian Bök's “="trms">literary genetics” ="trms">poetics of encryption of ="trms">data; ="trms">poetic vectors, to “infect” the ="trms">language;) describe/="trms">story your object (or an operative “="trms">verb” within your discourse) with univocalics='lgc'>: without using “e” or only using a single vowel. or, first ="trms">write with 3, then 2, then 1 vowel.

="prgrph">-the workshop is about='lgc'>: what other ="trms">stories (of your object) are possible='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-in the workshop (I take a temporary ="trms">position to) challenge others to re-tell the ="trms">story of their ((="trms">epistemological) found) objects
="prgrph">-a ‘generative constraint’ might help opening up paths before you, away from our habits of ="trms">storytelling
="prgrph">-it is about getting a feeling for the resistances and potentials of ="trms">language in our (sometimes mundane) descriptive practices, “strange richness of missing the letters we need” (="ppl">="ppl">Kenney)

the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors are dormant in our ="trms">routines of talking and noticing each other. how then, by ="trms">traversing the ="trms">routine, our “knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge” and “="trms">community” took on new meaning, as they get a chance of being re="trms">articulated in ="trms">different ="trms">languages (or ="trms">differenlty infected ="trms">literature)
='lgc'>~-='qstn'>?='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> changing the ="trms">system of classification (of thought)

="prgrph">-in a way the workshop is about an ='strcls'>*approach='strcls'>* to knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge generation (and not necessarily a ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous critique nor directly evaluating the production of our knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges)


='strcls'>***nothing is never merely a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor='strcls'>***

='lgc'>[some ="trms">fables from ="trms">science studies:='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Emily ="ppl">Martin's egg/sperm ="trms">story ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">stories of atomism, distribution of ="trms">agency, ='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--='lgc'>[The Egg and the Sperm='lgc'>: How ="trms">Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Hayward's microscope ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">tropes of ="trms">natural ="trms">history docu, ='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--='lgc'>[En="trms">folded Vision='lgc'>: Refracting The ="trms">Love Life of the Octopus='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Kenney/="ppl">="ppl">Haraway's o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin/="trms">nature ="trms">fable ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the omnipotence of the “o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin” ="trms">story in our descriptions and ="trms">interactions with the ="trms">natural ="trms">world
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Scott ="ppl">="ppl">Gilbert's immunological “bouncer” ="trms">story ='lgc'>=/= immune ="trms">systems as in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusive ="trms">agents of ="trms">symbiosis
="lsts lst1">•Lynn ="ppl">="ppl">Margulis='lgc'>: life (made possible) by “combat” ='lgc'>[the survival ="trms">fable that TV series “The 100” and “Kelile Demne” for instance is based on='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--='not'>✕='lgc'>='lgc'>--> life by ="trms">networking
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>: the tale of “organism='lgc'> = a ="trms">system of division of labor with executive functions” (='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> extraction of wealth among us)
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Morton's ="trms">causality-="trms">story
="lsts lst1">•brain/body ="trms">story ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> where the “move” came from='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•="frds">Sina's “standing on the shoulders of giants” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge/continuity, role of ="trms">authority and humility in ="trms">science ='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--='lgc'>[http://www.sinaseifee.com/giants.html='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•="frds">Sina's 3 little pigs ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> architecture/tech/ echics of encounter ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">story of the center and periphery ='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--='lgc'>[http://www.sinaseifee.com/pigs.html='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•“weapon fathered man” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Kubrick's african genesis, ="trms">technology ='lgc'>+ pre="trms">history (in postwar period) “tool ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> man”
="lsts lst1">•
="trms">fables popular in ="nms">apass='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•“a work ='lgc'>[of art='lgc'>] should speak for itself”
="lsts lst1">•“the very last ="trms">stage of the creative process is purely intuitive” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when people say they stop “="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading” or “knowing” when they want to create artwork
="lsts lst1">•“look really hard inside yourself for what you really want”
="lsts lst1">•“you are an ="trms">agent of change” that means art or thinking or being ought to be operative, active, transformative, (even destructive) and that is “political” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this ="trms">fable in found in ="trms">language; ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Barthes’ ="trms">fable of the woodcutter='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•


="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%">

no need for “conflict” nor “hero”
(in the way we give feedback, relate, ="trms">narrate, ="trms">story, and tell eachother our ="trms">matters of care and concern, and where we create zones of attachment; both in your “art work” and the mundane everyday of ‘getting on together’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">interrupting one's own framework)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%">
='at'>#workshop, on ="trms">question, feedback ="trms">method, to improve the ="trms">questions we ask each other
="prgrph">-what are the ="trms">questions (i could ask) that make you the most ="trms">articulate='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-the ="trms">question that asks what are the good ="trms">questions that offer an ="trms">interesting becoming for those to whom the ="trms">question is addressed
="prgrph">-to ask='lgc'>: does this ="trms">apparatus has stakes in docility or availability='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-more ="trms">interesting ="trms">questions ='lgc'>==enable='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> more ="trms">articulated answers ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> more ="trms">articulated identities
="prgrph">-asking (="trms">questions) (is not about ‘you want to know,’) is about constructing ="trms">interest ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> chance of ="trms">interesting answers
="prgrph">-asking about the ="trms">differential productions,  “='lgc'>=/=” or “=” or “='lgc'>=='lgc'>=>” in each other practices. these assessments are pro="trms">positional and ="trms">poetic remarks, guessing the artificialities that we live with, not finding of ="trms">matters of fact
="lsts lst2">◦asking about particularizations (تخصیص) and ="trms">generalizations (تعمیم)

='strcls'>**="trms">literature begins, ="ppl">Blanchot ="trms">writes, “at the moment when ="trms">literature becomes a ="trms">question”='strcls'>** (this is completely ="trms">different than asking or ="trms">question-marking in ="trms">literature) ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] this ="trms">question “is posed to ="trms">language by ="trms">language that has become ="trms">literature” (the ="trms">question that the meaning of the text asks is the ="trms">question asked by ="trms">literature; ='lgc'>[of course at the moment of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>[then what is a text before becoming a ="trms">question='qstn'>? ="trms">complaining='qstn'>? revolution='qstn'>?='lgc'>]='lgc'>--='prcnt'>%(negation wishes to realize itself.)

='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Rorty's critique of ="ppl">Descartes's way of asking ="trms">questions

we have to be careful with our practice of ="trms">questioning, because we often end up privileging a group of people by attributing it to “higher” levels cognition and of being “critically” in the ="trms">world (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">animal, nonpeople, other people with other ways of being in/with the apperceptive ="trms">world that don't use the ="trms">technology of ="trms">questioning, as it is ="trms">crafted ="trms">historically and ="trms">naturalized in the west for the univerasal ="trms">method of ‘knowing more’)

="large lg5" stl="font-size:138%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='at'>#workshop, ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading group
="lsts lst1">•="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading as passionate betrayal. (hunting for precious ="trms">="trms">empirical details, re="trms">figurative, reparative, poaching, ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading can be a betrayal of textual ="trms">authority and an act of survival)
="lsts lst1">•addressing /="trms">present='strcls'>* ="trms">differences, not al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready pre-figured ="trms">differences
="lsts lst1">•(condition of friendship, staying close to the text) staying close as a ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader, as someone who could hold the text of the Other, receiving it in the withdrawal / Entzug  (="trms">drug rehabilitation)
="lsts lst1">•i am in no ="trms">position of ‘understanding’ or being clear about the text
="lsts lst1">•(i understand now that) it is not up to me to tell you how to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read
="lsts lst1">•what makes you ="trms">write or scratch a text='qstn'>?
(aaaakh... our alphabetico-logical cultures...!)
="lsts lst1">•if everything is not fundamentally un="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readable (snafu) we wouldn't be ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading
="lsts lst1">•it is about to ="trms">situate the place of a (un)learning
="lsts lst1">•throwing access to each other (not only in terms of ="trms">transferential intensity ='at'>#sss)
="lsts lst1">•which appetites and tastes are required to fulfill the ='strcls'>*ethics and ="trms">erotics of curiosity='strcls'>* (that I am cultivating and depending on)='qstn'>? flourishing (of my ="nms">ajayeb) depends on a ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading that is more like “="trms">mutual partial[...]