[...]r /> om-ol-jebal (ام الجبال), ghaf (قاف)='lgc'>: mother of mountains, all mountains link to her, earth
="trms">ecologically significant ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> holders of water and Ganj (گنج), nailed the earth, they are your cradles
az ganj be ganj (فرستم به گنج تو از گنج خویش, ="ppl">Ferdosi)


='strcls'>*Ghiamat and Climate

='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>]
the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysical problem of (our) scale
(what are the scales in ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>? what is people in ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>? what it means to be ="trms">animal='qstn'>? and what is their scale='qstn'>?)
="trms">ecologies that have many scales (in temporality and physicality)='lgc'>: river scale, mountain scale, molecular times, Jinn's time, Ghiamat times, sense scale, ...

the ="nms">ajayeb's model is (always='qstn'>?) the global scale='qstn'>?
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how can i seek and describe multiple ="trms">situated ="trms">worldings and multiple ="trms">sorts of ="trms">translations to engage ="nms">ajayeb's globalism='qstn'>? (using ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway's word on ="ppl">Tsing)
="prgrph">-attention to friction ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> (ethnographic accounts of) global ="trms">interconnection

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> (some ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors='lgc'>:) ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metabolisms, ="trms">articulations, coproductions (='strcls'>*='qstn'>? of ="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">histories)
="trms">relational, ="trms">sympoietic, consequential,
in ="nms">ajayeb, what is cosmic, what is terran, what is cursed, ='strcls'>*='qstn'>?

in ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•what are the figures of ="trms">finitude, destruction, astralized hearing, enactments of generation, the figures that take action, take heart='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•what are the chthonic entities='qstn'>? ='lgc'>{the ="trms">finite complex ="trms">material ="trms">systems that can break down ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">stories that personify (Mother Earth) are ='strcls'>*misplaced concreteness='strcls'>*. ='lgc'>[(i am against) personified ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">figurative (which i ="trms">love. figures can be tentacular, patterns, processes, ="trms">stories.) what ="frds scrmbld">Foad would say='qstn'>?='lgc'>]='lgc'>}
="lsts lst1">•what are the gorgeous, ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">luring, d="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angerous precarities (of the terra)='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•what are (its ="trms">specific) art ="trms">science ="trms">worldings='qstn'>?

='strcls'>*those creatures across taxa (taxon, ="trms">categorical classification, taxonomic group)
taxonomic conveniences


='lgc'>[with ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>]

what is the optics of ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>?
='lgc'>[that is entertaining being reductive for a moment, but that is productive='lgc'>]
(to help with that, the optics of the ="trms">anthropo="trms">cene is the image of the earth from space, Gaia='qstn'>?)
="prgrph">-a cybernetic, ="trms">systems-theoretic entity, studied in ="trms">different scales
="prgrph">-various reports (on the state, ="trms">fictioning the state of the earth='qstn'>?)
="prgrph">-a global kind of ="trms">system knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
="prgrph">-a giant ="trms">database ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>----> do i need to ="trms">formulate my project into a ="trms">technological practice='qstn'>?

what is the smallest unit of ="trms">interest in the ="nms">ajayeb ="trms">cosmology='qstn'>?

the practices of relocating germplasms, in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding people in form of slaves, all over the earth in order to produce surplus that is transported elsewhere for capital accumulation... (="ppl">="ppl">Haraway)

industrial agriculture and plantation


to be storied and studied

the holobiont='lgc'>: host plus of all its microbial ="trms">symbionts that form ="trms">ecological units
="prgrph">-recasting the individual as a holobiont; the collective genomes
(Lynn ="ppl">="ppl">Margulis)
holobionts='lgc'>: “multicellular eukaryotes plus their colonies of persistent ="trms">symbionts”
(="ppl">="ppl">Gilbert, Sapp, and Tauber 326; ="trms">cited by ="ppl">="ppl">Kenney)
(thinking with holobionts) the immune ="trms">system is re-cast not as “defensive weaponry” but as a “="trms">socializing and unifying force” ='lgc'>[via ="ppl">="ppl">Kenney='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “to obey the immune ="trms">system is to become a citizen of the holobiont”
='lgc'>[this new developement of biological individuality (entangled identities at the heart of life mechanisms) in biological ="trms">sciences of 21st century requires a new ="trms">imaginative framework and new forms of curiosity equally relevant to ="trms">natural ="trms">sciences and artists='lgc'>]


(="nms">ajayeb-e gaz) عجایب گاز
co-existence of gasses


="large lg14" stl="font-size:103%"> planet ='lgc'>=/= terrestrial planet


(="nms">ajayeb-e graphs) psychotic tree-structure of giant ="trms">databases, in trans-ing and lines of trans-="trms">affecting
="prgrph">-my ="nms">ajayeb art is going to be the kind that depend on the machine='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>----competent digital
="prgrph">-exploring the iterative and fractal quality of sentences in my digital graph-makings
="prgrph">-attending to the ="trms">interruptions of syntactical commitments
partial connections (of distinct entities) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~= analogy ='lgc'>[analogy allows one part contaminate ="trms">systematically another part, and vice versa='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-coerced belief


the ="trms">question of binaries='lgc'>: how we are who we are in relentless ="trms">relationalities with other entities. in shaping and being shaped by objects, and subject/object is only convenient partial-good-enough for the moment ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**="trms">sorting operations='strcls'>** (kPRA0W1kECg), but they are not good descriptions beyond that.



="large lg6" stl="font-size:105%"> ='at'>#on Companion Manifesto
(="ppl">="ppl">Haraway's) ='strcls'>*cyborg='strcls'>*='lgc'>: the “lived ="trms">social and bodily realities in which people are not afraid of their joint kinship with ="trms">animals and machines, not afraid of permanently partial identities and contradictory standpoints.” ='lgc'>--to='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a much bigger queer family of ='strcls'>*companion ="trms">species='strcls'>* ='lgc'>: becoming-with ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the co-constitutive ="trms">interpenetration of humans and their others (machines, ="trms">animals, and the environment).
="prgrph">-="ppl">="ppl">Haraway is going from ‘rage’ to ‘="trms">love’

“="trms">historically challenged people” (Schimpfwort='qstn'>? فحش)
half-trained arguments
="trms">embodied cross-="trms">species ="trms">sociality

I am trying to inhabit ="nms">ajayeb critically; neither in celebration nor condemnation (like my sister asked)
what is my context='qstn'>? isis, tech-sci, art, ="trms">world-wars, ="trms">stories, terror,
the figures of ="nms">ajayeb that i am cultivating, do they “more fruitfully inform livable politics and ="trms">ontologies in current life ="trms">worlds”='qstn'>?
="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">species bring together human and nonhuman, organic and ="trms">technological, ="trms">history and myth, freedom and structure, state and subject, ...

="large lg1" stl="font-size:114%"> ='strcls'>*concrete='lgc'>:
="lsts lst2">◦a concrescence (growth by assimilation, nemov moshtarek نمو مشترک) of prehensions (seizing, perception but not necessarily cognition) of prehensions (graspings, chang zadan چنگ زدن)
="lsts lst2">◦an actual occasion
='lgc'>=> beings do not preexist their relatings

the ="trms">verb of reality is full of nouns with appendages

="trms">nature/culture='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*local ="trms">category abstractions='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= universal='lgc'>: misplaced concreteness)
subject/object='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*potent consequences='strcls'>* (='lgc'>=/= preexisting foundations)

foundation is always ="trms">contingent (="ppl">="ppl">Haraway > ="ppl">Butler)
="lsts lst1">•scale is ="trms">contingent
="lsts lst1">•mutability is ="trms">contingent

="trms">bestiary of ="trms">agencies
kinds of relatings

in ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb i am trying to carefully approach the notions of='lgc'>:
emergence, process, ="trms">historicity, ="trms">difference, ="trms">specificity
="prgrph">-and by that teach myself an artful practice rich with='lgc'>:
co-habitation, co-constitution, ="trms">contingency

on-the-ground work='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-="ppl">Verran ='at'># Nigeria Yoruba ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “emergent ="trms">ontologies,” “get on together” (...how can ='strcls'>*general='strcls'>* knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge be nurtured in postcolonial ="trms">worlds committed to taking ='strcls'>*="trms">difference='strcls'>* ="trms">seriously='qstn'>?”)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Thompson ='at'># Kenya ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “="trms">ontological choreographies” (...bodies, human and nonhuman, are taken apart and put together in processes)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Strathern ='at'># Papua New Guinean ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “partial connections” (...patterns within which the players are neither wholes nor parts ... necessary counter-intuitive ="trms">geometries and incongruent ="trms">translations)

what kind of re="trms">figurations i need for the tropic work that feel is required for the for ="trms">ontological choreography of ="nms">ajayeb (in ="trms">techno="trms">science or elsewhere='qstn'>? other ="trms">societies with liberal or non-liberal individual or state, with other ="trms">techno-="trms">monsters, automated warriors, terrorists, and all the waste, cruelty, in="trms">difference, ignorance, and loss that comes with, as well as joy, play, labor, and invention='lgc'>--)='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-how do i ="trms">narrate this (="nms">ajayeb and non-="nms">ajayeb, the wondrous and the mundane) co-="trms">history='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-how do i ="trms">embody an art of relating (as is never done once and for all)='qstn'>?

='strcls'>*="trms">species ='lgc'>: biological kind of reality ='lgc'>+ ="trms">scientific expertise necessary to that kind of reality
(what would or could trouble ‘biological kind,’ ‘="trms">categories of organism’='qstn'>?)
='lgc'>{ machinic ='lgc'>+ textual ='lgc'>+ organic ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-='lgc'>=> ="trms">species ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">causality-="trms">story, o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin-="trms">story, Real-="trms">Presence-="trms">story (='lgc'>~transubstantiated signs of the flesh),
="lsts lst1">•="trms">species is about defining ="trms">difference, rooted in polyvocal fugues of ='strcls'>**doctrines of cause='strcls'>**
="lsts lst1">•one thinks of ="trms">species as logical ="trms">category, logical type, visual impression, ="trms">members of a ="trms">category that have the same characteristics. but you also say “be ="trms">specific!” you want the op="trms">posite. you want a ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list of relentless particularities.
="lsts lst1">•(for ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway ="trms">species is about) a particular kind of ="trms">semiotics where sign and flesh are tangled

="ppl">Marx and ="ppl">Freud in shit and gold, primitive scat and civilized ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metal, in ="trms">specie

='lgc'>[title='lgc'>]
='strcls'>**="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">technologies of (Persian) subject/object-making='strcls'>**

="trms">nature and culture implode into one another (in the relentlessly ="trms">historically ="trms">specific ways)

(="ppl">="ppl">Haraway > ="ppl">Althusser) ='strcls'>**="trms">interpellation='strcls'>** (estizah استیضاح) ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> concrete individuals (in the ="trms">modern state)
='strcls'>*the ideologically loaded ="trms">narratives ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> life and death, health and illness, longevity and extinction, etc.
='lgc'>{how not to do estizah (our objects, peers)='qstn'>? latent individualization in ="nms">apass's requirement of ‘intentionality’ from its participants='lgc'>: “no sleep-walking!” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> art as “explicit intentional act.” ="ppl">Merleau-Ponty's account the body-schema.='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[estizah is the site of encounter with the ‘man of law’ in which one becomes a man of law='lgc'>: by asking what is your “name and business,” ="trms">demanding “proof” of me. one way of ="trms">responding to that ="trms">demand of name is to give your name as a performance in an amerindian mode='lgc'>: “three were dead before they knew.” that's my name.='lgc'>] The ="trms">material ritual practice of ‘recognition’ ='lgc'>: “Who is there='qstn'>?” and “It's me!” of the everyday life ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> makes us concrete subject (in the ideology in democracy and law) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> independent ="trms">agents with self-produced identities. (in capita="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list ="trms">societies) ='strcls'>**subject='lgc'>: a self-conscious “="trms">responsible” ="trms">agent whose actions can be explained by his or her beliefs and thoughts.='strcls'>** subject formation defines the limits of each individual; values, desires, and preferences. ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>---- in a way that I realize that a ‘hailing’ was addressed at me, thinking ‘that means me,’ and the answer is what transforms me into a subject ='lgc'>: a “mis-recognition” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we can open a dossier on prophet and ‘answering’ the call='lgc'>]; ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> what ="nms">Tarof hails='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>---- for ="ppl">Althusser being aware of the other is a form of ideology. (how to recognize ourselves outside of ideology='qstn'>?)='lgc'>} (="ppl">Foucauldian/="ppl">Althusserian='lgc'>: passively defined by identity ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> mobilizing around these identities ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> potential for resistance)
(="ppl">Althusser's) police officer ='lgc'>[محتسب mohtaseb='qstn'>?='lgc'>] ='lgc'>--hails='lgc'>='lgc'>--> concrete subject
(="ppl">="ppl">Foucault's) expert discourses ='lgc'>--hails='lgc'>='lgc'>--> sexuality
(="ppl">Adorno's) mass media ='lgc'>--hails='lgc'>='lgc'>--> passive ="trms">consumer
(Gauntlett's) uncritical ="trms">consumption ='lgc'>--hails='lgc'>='lgc'>--> assumption ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> bad ="trms">worlding
(="ppl">Mulvey's) cinema ='lgc'>--hails='lgc'>='lgc'>--> male protagonist
(="ppl">Butler's) boy/girl ='lgc'>--hails='lgc'>='lgc'>--> gender identity
(="frds">Sina's) تعارف ="nms">Tarof ='lgc'>--hails='lgc'>='lgc'>--> divnity ='qstn'>?='qstn'>?

='strcls'>***(="trms">crafted faithfully='qstn'>?) more potent the ="trms">tropes, the truer the ="trms">story='strcls'>***
(without being distracted by scandals and ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta-="trms">stories='qstn'>?!)

="trms">stories traffic in ="trms">tropes, figures of speech
(the dogmatic and bizzar idea of) “="trms">trope-free ="trms">communication”

='strcls'>*="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaplasm, remodeling, remolding,,, inverting meanings, transposing the body of ="trms">communication,
(in my graphs, or ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs, what a substitution in a string might change the meaning='qstn'>?)

what is the “troping that makes a fleshly ="trms">difference”='qstn'>?

o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin ="trms">story (='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> establishing o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin) ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> sober ="trms">scientific report ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> scales of intelligence ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> human as master

="large lg10" stl="font-size:101%"> the “mere” village dog='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-canine Eves surviving in their mitochondrial DNA
="prgrph">-canine Adam through his Y-chromosome legacies

which ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaplasmic, remodeled versions of ‘name’ could give ="nms">ajayeb's being

(in ="nms">apass I have been against the “what do I want as an artist='qstn'>?” ="trms">question='lgc'>:)
pay attention to significant otherness ='lgc'>=/= reflection of one's intentions

what is the name of the game='qstn'>? complexity, flexibility, opportunism, (="trms">finite ="trms">worlds called='lgc'>:) domestic, ="trms">wild, feral,
='lgc'>[who is naming the ="trms">world what='qstn'>?
="lsts lst1">•accelerationism='lgc'>: “game-over”
="lsts lst1">•capitalism='lgc'>: “resource”
="lsts lst1">•="trms">technophobia='lgc'>: “obsolescence”
="lsts lst1">•="trms">technophilia='lgc'>: “information”
="lsts lst1">•monotheism='lgc'>: “="trms">transition”
="lsts lst1">•="trms">science='lgc'>: “taxa”
="lsts lst1">•multinationalism='lgc'>: “="trms">system”
="lsts lst1">•="trms">modernism='lgc'>: “globe"='lgc'>]

immune ="trms">systems (in ="trms">natureculture) determine where organisms, in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding people, can live and with whom.

“There is no time or place at which genetics ends and environment begins” ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>]
(="ppl">="ppl">Haraway > ="ppl">="ppl">Gilbert)

“All ="trms">stages of the life ="trms">histories of evolving ="trms">animals had to adapt to eager bacteria colonizing them inside and out.”
To be ="trms">animal is to become-with bacteria


to inhabit an ="trms">inter-subjective ="trms">world, to ="trms">love is about meeting the other in all the fleshly detail of a mortal ="trms">relationship (to wit, first, somehow to learn what this other needs and desires)='lgc'>='lgc'>---permanent search for knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of the intimate other, with inevitable comic and tragic mistakes in that quest


thinking about ="trms">animals as “other ="trms">worlds” in a ="trms">science ="trms">fictional sense


="trms">scientifically informed, ="trms">="trms">empirically grounded practice

theory ...still a limited discourse and a rough ="trms">instrument

“who is at home='qstn'>?” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ask in respect for all of time who and what are emerging in ="trms">relationship ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the ="trms">obligation to ask) who are ="trms">present and who are emergent='qstn'>? ='strcls'>***

(what are our) ="trms">categorical labor
labor of training ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> somehow all the participants of training are remodeled by it
labor of scale-making
(these are ="trms">world-making practices, ="trms">storytellings)

significant otherness-in-connection ='lgc'>=/= intention-ascribing idioms of ="trms">litera="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism that sees furry humans in ="trms">animal bodies and ="trms">measures their worth in scales of similarity to the ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights-bearing, humanist subjects of Western philosophy and political theory ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> assign privileges or guardianship (in place of ownership) in a ="trms">modernist great chain of being

='strcls'>*action='lgc'>: beautiful, hard, ="trms">specific, personal;
='lgc'>=/= abstract scales

="trms">differential sensibility ='lgc'>=='qstn'>?='lgc'>=> ="trms">situated emergence ='lgc'>=='qstn'>?='lgc'>=> more livable ="trms">worlds ='lgc'>~ ="trms">ontological choreography

="trms">category of “="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights” don't just exist (preformed to be uncovered,) rather we enter into a ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rights ="trms">relationship with an other (="trms">animal or human)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Hearne's “reciprocal possession”
="prgrph">-morality is a ="trms">species-="trms">specific capacity
='lgc'>~ if i have X, my X has a human (which is me)


off-leash and cliff-enclosed ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Varinia


(="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>:) time-space scales co-constituted by human, ="trms">animal, and inanimate ="trms">agencies
="lstsrd">1. evolutionary time (at the level of the planet earth) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">naturalcultural ="trms">species
="lstsrd">2. face-to-face time (at the scale of individual lifetimes) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> mortal bodies
="lstsrd">3. ="trms">historical time (at the scale of decades, populations, nations)

to tell (detailed ="trms">love and training) ="trms">stories at these levels

this is about distributed ="trms">agencies in “layers of locals and globals,”

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

my ="trms">interests lies really with the ="trms">ecological ="trms">cosmologies in my neighborhood (="nms">iran, old, middle east, far east, ="trms">past, ="trms">present,)
='thdf'>that is why i was ="trms">interested in the ="trms">birds of ="ppl">Attar, pig of san'an, wolf of the pigs, crow of the partridge, and so on.
so things take ="trms">positions in our bigger ="trms">semiotic ="trms">material ="trms">world, there is never just a life ="trms">animal on the plate, the chicken has become killable first through ="trms">linguistic ="trms">interpretive re="trms">presentation ="trms">network of ="trms">semiotic ="trms">relations. so my ="trms">question in the ="trms">birds performance was that how the ="trms">excess of meaning is related in actuality to the removal of corporeality in ="ppl">Attar's non-="trms">birdness Simurgh (سیمرغ) till the chicken in khoresh-e morgh (خورشت مرغ).

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> ="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Scott ="ppl">="ppl">Gilbert='lgc'>]

(all organic beings have been formed on two general laws, ="trms">according to ="ppl">Darwin='lgc'>:)
(1) unity of type and (2) conditions of existence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inorganic='qstn'>? fire='qstn'>?
="trms">natural selection ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> adaptation ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> conditions of existence
embryonic homologies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> unity of type
='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> “descent with modification” (or decent modifications)
='lgc'>[(embryology ='lgc'>=/=) ‘fire’ could transform ="trms">matters, “change” their class, their type and its unity ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “parvaneh sho!” (پروانه شو) ="ppl">Rumi مولوی wants embryology undermined='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%"> construct phylogenies
(phylogeny ='lgc'>: branching out evolutionarily)


‘Haeckel claimed that ="ppl">Darwin's ideas in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluded the progressive development of ="trms">species. “Development and progress” was what characterized evolution. The explicit as="trms">sociation of evolution with particular political, ="trms">religious, and racial views became the hallmark of Haeckel's career. Haeckel proposed a ="trms">causal parallelism between the embryological development and phylogeny. His “Biogenetic Law” that “="trms">Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny” was based on ='thdf'>the idea that the successive (and to him, progressive) o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of new ="trms">species was based on the same laws as the successive and progressive o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of new embryonic structures. Just as the earlier ="trms">stages of human development developed into the later ="trms">stages, so earlier ="trms">species evolved into the later ones. ="trms">Natural selection wou[...]