[...]genetic Law” that “="trms">Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny” was based on ='thdf'>the idea that the successive (and to him, progressive) o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of new ="trms">species was based on the same laws as the successive and progressive o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of new embryonic structures. Just as the earlier ="trms">stages of human development developed into the later ="trms">stages, so earlier ="trms">species evolved into the later ones. ="trms">Natural selection would eventually get rid of the earlier ="trms">species. (In the Welträtsel, Haeckel ='lgc'>[1899='lgc'>] would also proclaim that the more evolved humans ='lgc'>[i.e., the Aryans='lgc'>] would out-compete and eliminate the more primitive races.) To Haeckel, the evolution of the ="trms">animal kingdom was the same as individual development not only because the laws behind each were the same but also because the entire ="trms">animal kingdom was an individual. Here, he was harking back to the views of the ="trms">Naturphilosophen of the previous century. In other words, the development of advanced ="trms">species was seen to pass through ="trms">stages re="trms">presented by adult organisms of more primitive ="trms">species.’ (The ="trms">morphogenesis of evolutionary developmental biology)

="trms">inter-cellular di="trms">gestion
="lsts lst1">•the evolution of new features was based on changes in developmental ="trms">stages, not in adult a="trms">stages (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> that's why the developmental ="trms">stage is so important, because mutations happen ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> work with ="trms">children)

="trms">Ontogeny or ="trms">morphogenesis='lgc'>: organism's developmental lifespan
Phylogeny='lgc'>: evolutionary ="trms">historical ="trms">heritable traits

="trms">ontogeny ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> phylogeny
“="trms">ontogeny does not recapitulate phylogeny='lgc'>: it creates it” (Garstang, 1922; p. 724)


="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> evolution was not so much a branched chain as a ladder

molecular ="trms">systematics

evo-devo (evolutionary developmental biology)

each discipline has='lgc'>:
="prgrph">-its own rules of evidence
="prgrph">-its own professors
="prgrph">-its own journals
="prgrph">-its own ="trms">vocabulary


small genetic changes was not sufficient to generate evolutionary novel structures such as teeth, feathers, cnidocysts or mollusk shells (="ppl">Goldschmidt, 1940) (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> lizards had ="trms">birdness in it ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> potentiality)

(new ="trms">species o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginate as) ='strcls'>***hopeful ="trms">monsters='strcls'>***
that result from mutations in developmentally important loci (-macromutations)

="ppl">Goldschmidt='lgc'>: the gene wasn't a locus or an allele. Rather, it was a unit of development

“to convince evolutionists that evolution is not only a statistical genetical problem but also one of the developmental potentialities of organism”

(="ppl">Waddington 1953 claimed='lgc'>:) ...in conventional studies of evolution, the ="trms">animal is considered either as genotype (and studied by geneticists) or as phenotype ='lgc'>[Erscheingungsbild ='lgc'>] (and is studied by taxonomists)
(="ppl">Waddington then kaunched into a) critique of ='thdf'>the notion of “random mutation,” noting that there are developmental constraints placed on what changes are possible.
="lsts lst1">•“we think of development as a cybernetic process, involving stablization through feed-back and other mechanisms.”


(Francois Jacob) “Evolution by tinkering” (sare-ham-bandi سرهم بندی)

(Leigh van Valen 1973) “evolution is the control of development by ="trms">ecology”

phenotypic plasticity
developmental plasticity


organism='lgc'>: an epigenetic ="trms">materialism='strcls'>****** (Hertwig 1894)
(Hertwig con="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cludes='lgc'>: it has been shown ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] that much of what Weismann would explain by) determinants within the egg must have cause outside the egg.
='lgc'>[='strcls'>***egg and its outside='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[the ="trms">causality drama is not that which came first, the chicken or the egg, but what inside the egg that has cause outside the egg='lgc'>]


context-dependent sex

genetic assimilation

="large lg1" stl="font-size:121%"> life ="trms">history strategies

teratology (kaj-rikht-shenasi کج ریخت شناسی‌, naghes-al-khelghe-shenasi ناقص الخلقه شناسی‌)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

re="trms">writing ="trms">technique criteria (of the gene) ='lgc'>[from new biological headquarters='lgc'>]

retro-transposon='lgc'>: a DNA sequence that can change its ="trms">position within a genome, sometimes creating or reversing mutations and altering the cell's genetic identity and genome size
(we have uterus because of bacterial transposons)

intestinal

enzyme, macromolecular biological catalysts, accelerating chemical reaction

using ="trms">hallucinogenic to cure autism (!='qstn'>?)
bacterial ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">social

“individual"='lgc'> = an island to be colonized (by bacteria), ='lgc'>[we are='lgc'>] a niche (upon niche (upon niche)) for bacteria

immunall ="trms">agencise are not (has never been) defensive, they selectively in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusive, they facilitate ="trms">symbiosis, allowing the possibility of microbes become part of the body

co-="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metabolism
host-diet

four major ="trms">symbiosis (="trms">symbiotic things) that ruled the planet='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. rhizobacteria/legumes for nitrogen fixation
="lstsrd">2. mycorrhizal ="trms">interaction with plant roots and seeds
="lstsrd">3. endophytic fungal protection against dessication
="lstsrd">4. coral reefs and tidal seagrass eco="trms">systems sustain oceanic biodiversity
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--containing='lgc'>='lgc'>--> smaller ="trms">symbiotic webs we call “organism” ='lgc'><='lgc'>==='lgc'>[product of='lgc'>]='lgc'>== (ancient ="trms">symbiosis we call) “cells ='lgc'>+ (ancient ="trms">symbiosis we call) “genomes”



ritual defense of a dissertation, ="trms">matter of opponent

a medical theater of dissection, laid out on table with the working-class barber-surgeons laying bare structures for the disquisition (tafahos تفحص) of the professor ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (the ways we are in this) ='strcls'>*multi-="trms">imaginative theater='strcls'>* (='lgc'>~ congnitive emotional ="trms">apparatus) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> infectious joy, the ="trms">situatedness of the joy is infectious

we (should always) work in the context of joy
lost for details (for the fleshiness of ‘this’), not as a general principal or an example for something else

='strcls'>*the tale of detail='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a small detail that wrenches the self into something that was not before
(the tale of understanding)

="ppl">="ppl">Gilbert's bio-="trms">sym-="trms">poetic joy ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge-making

(="ppl">="ppl">Gilbert's) genomic fragment in the picture of ="trms">mutual-benefit life ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> metropolitan life insurance company
='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">apparatuses of thinking='strcls'>* have ="trms">thick trading zones between ="trms">ecology and economics up to and in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding today, that is the mutal adaptation in real ="trms">world, producing problems for us='lgc'>]

(how we go='qstn'>?) from one life-table to another life-table
(='thdf'>for example from mathematics of life insurance to population biology ='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> co-developement of disciplines; 19th century laboratories ='lgc'>+ practices of political economy;)
='lgc'>[="trms">matters of ="trms">historical, economical, manegerial, capital, ='lgc'>]


(protestants that were never burnt enough)


we (always) remain in contamination ='lgc'>[never in innocence ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> be attentive to the ="trms">tropes and will to innocence in each other act text='lgc'>]


in our ="trms">questioning and studies we (must) remain enmeshed, in a ="trms">historical conjunction, in a ="trms">situated way of being “this way” and not “that way”

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Stengers='lgc'>]

='lgc'>[a kind of='lgc'>] ="trms">writing (not ="trms">writing down)

="trms">writing is an experience of ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphic transformation

to discover how to be compromised by ="nms">ajayeb Nameh
the ways we can be ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lured into desiring and trusting it

="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%"> how the assemblages of ="nms">ajayeb generate ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphic transformations in our capacity to ="trms">affect and be ="trms">affected='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to feel, think, and ="trms">imagine

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Serres='lgc'>]

="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%"> ="nms">ajayeb, a time when transport and itinerary were only myth

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Anand='lgc'>]

the sanctity and blessing of Muslim saints was ="trms">integrally linked to local ="trms">ecology and topography

="large lg5" stl="font-size:138%"> that sanctification of ="trms">birds and stones alerts us to an Indic and Islamic vision of humans in which we are not separated from and hierarchically superior to ="trms">nature. Rather, the boundaries that separate stones, ="trms">animals, humans and gods are porous as well as being non-hierarchical='lgc'>--making possible a “lateral” moral aspiration, where ="trms">birds and stones can be moral exemplars for humans.

The ="trms">interlinked sacrality of both ="trms">ecology and ="trms">cosmology, of ‘kudrat’ (='lgc'>~ power of ="trms">nature='qstn'>?) is common to both Hindus and Muslims. ‘Kudrat’ is thus the ="trms">cosmological aspect of north India's Invisible ="trms">Religion.

There is a long Islamic tradition of seeing ="trms">Nature as full of the signs (ayat آیات) of the work and ="trms">presence of God. The Qur'anic verse “Withersoever you turn, there is the Face of God ( Qur'an 2='lgc'>: 115)” has traditionally been ="trms">interpreted by the Sufis as meaning that the “order of ="trms">nature is[...]