[...]gs.html='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•“weapon fathered man” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Kubrick's african genesis, ="trms">technology ='lgc'>+ pre="trms">history (in postwar period) “tool ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> man”
="lsts lst1">•
="trms">fables popular in ="nms">apass='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•“a work ='lgc'>[of art='lgc'>] should speak for itself”
="lsts lst1">•“the very last ="trms">stage of the creative process is purely intuitive” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> when people say they stop “="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading” or “knowing” when they want to create artwork
="lsts lst1">•“look really hard inside yourself for what you really want”
="lsts lst1">•“you are an ="trms">agent of change” that means art or thinking or being ought to be operative, active, transformative, (even destructive) and that is “political” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> this ="trms">fable in found in ="trms">language; ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to ="ppl">Barthes’ ="trms">fable of the woodcutter='lgc'>]
="lsts lst1">•




no need for “conflict” nor “hero”
(in the way we give feedback, relate, ="trms">narrate, ="trms">story, and tell eachother our ="trms">matters of care and concern, and where we create zones of attachment; both in your “art work” and the mundane everyday of ‘getting on together’ ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">interrupting one's own framework)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%">
='at'>#workshop, on ="trms">question, feedback ="trms">method, to improve the ="trms">questions we ask each other
="prgrph">-what are the ="trms">questions (i could ask) that make you the most ="trms">articulate='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-the ="trms">question that asks what are the good ="trms">questions that offer an ="trms">interesting becoming for those to whom the ="trms">question is addressed
="prgrph">-to ask='lgc'>: does this ="trms">apparatus has stakes in docility or availability='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-more ="trms">interesting ="trms">questions ='lgc'>==enable='lgc'>='lgc'>==> more ="trms">articulated answers ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> more ="trms">articulated identities
="prgrph">-asking (="trms">questions) (is not about ‘you want to know,’) is about constructing ="trms">interest ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> chance of ="trms">interesting answers
="prgrph">-asking about the ="trms">differential productions,  “='lgc'>=/=” or “=” or “='lgc'>='lgc'>==>” in each other practices. these assessments are pro="trms">positional and ="trms">poetic remarks, guessing the artificialities that we live with, not finding of ="trms">matters of fact
="lsts lst2">◦asking about particularizations (تخصیص) and ="trms">generalizations (تعمیم)

="large lg1" stl="font-size:146%"> ='strcls'>**="trms">literature begins, ="ppl">Blanchot ="trms">writes, “at the moment when ="trms">literature becomes a ="trms">question”='strcls'>** (this is completely ="trms">different than asking or ="trms">question-marking in ="trms">literature) ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] this ="trms">question “is posed to ="trms">language by ="trms">language that has become ="trms">literature” (the ="trms">question that the meaning of the text asks is the ="trms">question asked by ="trms">literature; ='lgc'>[of course at the moment of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>[then what is a text before becoming a ="trms">question='qstn'>? ="trms">complaining='qstn'>? revolution='qstn'>?='lgc'>]='lgc'>--='prcnt'>%(negation wishes to realize itself.)

='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Rorty's critique of ="ppl">Descartes's way of asking ="trms">questions

we have to be careful with our practice of ="trms">questioning, because we often end up privileging a group of people by attributing it to “higher” levels cognition and of being “critically” in the ="trms">world (='lgc'>=/= ="trms">animal, nonpeople, other people with other ways of being in/with the apperceptive ="trms">world that don't use the ="trms">technology of ="trms">questioning, as it is ="trms">crafted ="trms">historically and ="trms">naturalized in the west for the univerasal ="trms">method of ‘knowing more’)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='at'>#workshop, ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading group
="lsts lst1">•="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading as passionate betrayal. (hunting for precious ="trms">="trms">empirical details, re="trms">figurative, reparative, poaching, ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading can be a betrayal of textual ="trms">authority and an act of survival)
="lsts lst1">•addressing /="trms">present='strcls'>* ="trms">differences, not al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready pre-figured ="trms">differences
="lsts lst1">•(condition of friendship, staying close to the text) staying close as a ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader, as someone who could hold the text of the Other, receiving it in the withdrawal / Entzug  (="trms">drug rehabilitation)
="lsts lst1">•i am in no ="trms">position of ‘understanding’ or being clear about the text
="lsts lst1">•(i understand now that) it is not up to me to tell you how to ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read
="lsts lst1">•what makes you ="trms">write or scratch a text='qstn'>?
(aaaakh... our alphabetico-logical cultures...!)
="lsts lst1">•if everything is not fundamentally un="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readable (snafu) we wouldn't be ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading
="lsts lst1">•it is about to ="trms">situate the place of a (un)learning
="lsts lst1">•throwing access to each other (not only in terms of ="trms">transferential intensity ='at'>#sss)
="lsts lst1">•which appetites and tastes are required to fulfill the ='strcls'>*ethics and ="trms">erotics of curiosity='strcls'>* (that I am cultivating and depending on)='qstn'>? flourishing (of my ="nms">ajayeb) depends on a ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading that is more like “="trms">mutual partial di="trms">gestion” (="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King, ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= “eating well"='lgc'>] the text
="lsts lst1">•“every time i ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read X, something new shows up”

my practice of ‘="trms">rhetorical ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading’ (='lgc'>=/= ‘close ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading’; or more like close ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading and letting go. “close” is itself a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphor, a ="trms">rhetoric of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading;) doesn't work with ='thdf'>the idea that there is something ‘in’ the text per se (="trms">coded or en="trms">coded meaning or some ="trms">sort of knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge made and installed by an ="trms">author), or that the ="trms">writer wants to say something to the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader, or that the text is ="trms">symptomatic with meaning and that its intentions needs to be ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listened to. rather, in a post-="ppl">Lacanian critique, i work the text like a pattern of ="trms">language, an organization of space, text as word-sequencer. it is like looking at an image, still starting from top-left to bottom-="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">right of the page, a process of highlighting or ="trms">embodied attention that produces non-zero ="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusters of salient words that come to glow ="trms">different than others. but the way they become highlighted is not due to some idea of significance of the text but because of my='lgc'>--the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader's='lgc'>--="trms">interests, ="trms">past ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readings and educated meaning-as="trms">sociations. this mode of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading is not at all sug="trms">gested to newbies in ="trms">literature, sorry but this requres some degree of advancement in one's abilities and ="trms">skills of ="trms">writing="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, that means the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready enjoys an ongoing well-="trms">articulated ="trms">interest before coming to a particular sitting with a piece of ="trms">writing, and this means the ="trms">rhetorical ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader's encounter with the text is highly ="trms">situated and is not a blind date. in this case ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading is a radical meaning-making practice full of adventures and preparations, drawings and graphs, diffractions and detours, connections and risks of (mis)understanding in certain ways. this ‘="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading’ looks very much ‘="trms">writing’ alike.
="prgrph">-the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading becomes ='strcls'>*re="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="trms">past ="trms">writing='strcls'>*, re(="trms">past)ed(="trms">writ)ing, a ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading that has ="trms">writen itself in ="trms">palimpsestic lines. in a ="ppl">Derridean sense='lgc'>: (one is ="trms">="trms">equiped with the ="trms">question) “what is ="trms">writing itself (in this text)”='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-two speculative spheres meet in ="trms">rhetorical ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading='lgc'>: one of the text and one of the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader, but they have to ‘stick’ to one another, the stickiness of your ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="trms">matters in consequential ways. this is against ='thdf'>the idea that we ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read and each understand personally whatever.
="lsts lst1">•my second issue with ‘close ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading’='lgc'>: there is no cor="trms">relation between the speed of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading and comprehension/apprehension

='strcls'>*="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading practices='strcls'>*
="trms">ontology usually decides what ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading is ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*="trms">book-binding is ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading. editorial com="trms">positional reformating and remodeling of the space of the text is ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading.

(="ppl">="ppl">Stewartian) ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading that happens in the ="trms">writing='lgc'>: you can't do any kind of exegesis of the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading تفسير, rather='lgc'>: ='strcls'>*you have to become related to the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading in what you are ="trms">writing='strcls'>*


in research='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">skills of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading and ="trms">writing
="lsts lst1">•(more abstract) ="trms">skills of conceptualizing and analysing

='at'>@="nms">apass='lgc'>: begin with the generation of research ="trms">question ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> importance of ="trms">language
(you flag the importance of ="trms">language whenever research is marked by ="trms">question. “='qstn'>?” is a ="trms">linguistic construct)

="lsts lst1">•the ="trms">skill/="trms">craft is to select a research ="trms">question that works better for certain descriptive purposes (than does previous tools)
="lsts lst1">•(realism='lgc'>:) research ="trms">question ='lgc'><='lgc'>==outcome='lgc'>== ="trms">different concerns and emphases

="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigor of conceptualization ='lgc'>: quality of an access to part of a ="trms">world “out there”

research ="trms">method='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•“mapping into knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge” ='lgc'>: co-fabrication between the rese="trms"nttrm="search">archer and the diverse others engaged in the process ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (problem of) ‘="trms">positionality ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">data’ (='thdf'>the idea that the rese="trms"nttrm="search">archer produces knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge or “facts”)
="lsts lst2">◦="trms">positionality ='lgc'>==='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>==> politically correct jargon in artistic research environment ='lgc'>[has ="trms">positionality backfired into a ="trms">language of trying to change a public opinion in your favour='qstn'>?='lgc'>]

‘fantasy of the unproblematic mode’

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

regarding biographical work ="trms">according to ="frds scrmbld">Pierre, ok i am working even on the border of solipsism
what i am doing is not auto="trms">poiesis (self-making, making a ="trms">poem out of yourself) rather ="trms">sym="trms">poiesis (with-making, with people from ="trms">different ="trms">worlds and ="trms">pasts)

trying to contain every available mode of ="trms">interpretation in ='mywrk'>my work
(collecting all the modes of ="trms">interpretation)

(for the psychoanalyst as ="trms">writer,) the ='strcls'>*unconscious functions as a ='strcls'>*="trms">trope
unconscious ='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? ="trms">trope

='strcls'>*my actual ="trms">interest is in “the place of study”
which is ="trms">embodied by its par[...]