[...]or phrase that is very long or difficult to say. ='lgc'>: something said that has a lot of meaning or importance.
="trms">interdisciplinary exploration of
is “what is your project about again='qstn'>?” the ="trms">question we want to ask in ="nms">apass='qstn'>? does this ="trms">question really helps the other='qstn'>? or is it just for you, the ="trms">questioner='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-how to resist the ="trms">interference of double click='qstn'>?
="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%">
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
(in the direction of ='mywrk'>my research; hastily opening the ="trms">ontological envelope that saves a heart full of “="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list of ="trms">specifications”...)
the visit will be to the ‘European Committee for Standardization’ (CEN, French='lgc'>: Comité Européen de Normalization), one of the EU fostered nonprofit public institutions of the cutting-="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge development regarding ambitious notion of ‘="trms">data,’ ‘="trms">systematic knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge,’ and ‘="trms">specifications’. the excursion will be oriented towards a meeting between the participants of advanced performance and scenography studies and the re="trms">presentatives of CEN, and encourages a run between the ="trms">ontological ="trms">demands of ="trms">international economy and contemporary art, their disastrous split, and where their formations meet and ="trms">intersect.
KEYWORDS='lgc'>: ="trms">cosmology, experimentation, existence, ="trms">specification, future, knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, irrationality, permanence and substance, ="trms">technological acts='lgc'>--of naming, a path of becoming='lgc'>--on the grid of ="trms">technological dominion, suspicious partnership of “advanced democracies” and “high ="trms">technology"='lgc'>--what allows their ="trms">mutuality='qstn'>?, standard-testing='lgc'>--which sectors of existence it is ="trms">traversing='qstn'>?, pre-="trms">technological traces of cognitive normalization, the very little ="trms">difference between ="trms">specification and “the real thing,” THE o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of the ="trms">demand for ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorous ="trms">specification, migration of ="trms">questions out of the areas of ="trms">instrumental fitness, human ="trms">relation to the surrounding ="trms">world, impoverished ="trms">zoologies='lgc'>--under ="trms">techno-="trms">epistemo-="trms">anthropocentric values, squeezing pre="trms">historic modes of weakening subjectival normativity='lgc'>--a field that today gets heavily ="trms">technologized,
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
to bring our needs and ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lures towards each other
bring my ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure to the table (that thing which i can't stop following)
who/what are you pregnant with='qstn'>?
(that is what you are proposing)
(that is to play with the ‘="trms">histories of body and mind’ ='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>] you in="trms">herit ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> for me is to play with the pre-subjective singularities)
='lgc'>[in="trms">heritance is of great importance for our research. it is about the passing of ="trms">obligations from something ghost-like. i am sure we have other modes of ="trms">response available to us other than how Hamlet takes in what is in="trms">herited to him, other ways of ="trms">responding to the ghostly beings that talk to us from death. (in="trms">heritance ='lgc'>~= inhabiting spirit ='lgc'>[they cannot be possess as a piece of property='lgc'>], ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading inflaming flashes of remote spirits ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> is this hear from one another looks like='qstn'>? is ="trms">technology placed at the source of this reflection='qstn'>?='lgc'>--="trms">technology itself answers the call='lgc'>--(="ppl">Avital)='lgc'>]) could we work with Ophelia's kind of ='at'>#Wortsalad instead='qstn'>? (Salad-e Kalame, khoresht-e kalame; same thing happens to Shirin of in Khosro Shirin, but unlike ="ppl">Shakespeare, ="ppl">Nezami allows another ="trms">poetic drift;) ="ppl">Heidegger's “die Sprache spricht” ='lgc'>: ="trms">language is monologue ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">schizophrenia and ="trms">schizophrenic discourse ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> structure of speaking='lgc'>]
='lgc'>[speaking asserts a certain temporal ="trms">priority which we must undermine='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening ='strcls'>*before='strcls'>* speaking
="prgrph">-“We hear ="trms">language speaking” (="ppl">Heidegger); a non-organic speaking; ="trms">language is not ="trms">="trms">equipped with organs of speech='qstn'>? (="ppl">Avital)
="large lg1" stl="font-size:118%">
="trms">serious ="trms">joking / ="trms">joking ="trms">seriousness ='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>]
="trms">joke/="trms">jest/="trms">gesture
a space of play ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> where ideas come in to being
(="trms">story of ‘or’. is it where the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginal ="trms">joker came='qstn'>? using or instead of and)
(there is no ‘or’ in ="trms">nature!='qstn'>? what are the earlier forms of or that we can trace in cave paintings or tool makings='qstn'>?)
='strcls'>**if you don't take my idea ="trms">seriously i will be utterly incomprehensible='strcls'>**
="trms">crafts-person for the building of ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lures of pro="trms">positions ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘abstractions’
(abstraction is fragile and can hold ="trms">worlds together)
where Europe comes from='qstn'>? (woher kommst du='qstn'>? i am born in, i am born in, ...)
what animates us rather than what civilizes us
(to ="frds scrmbld">Shabnam='lgc'>:) to ‘mourn with’ rather than ‘mourn about’
(-about ='lgc'>=/= -with)
(structure of mourning)
to break in the philosophical and biological headquarters (and steal their ="trms">stories, their abstractions, etc.)
exchanging and sharing ="trms">instruments and ="trms">languages
this is about building something that is ‘good enough’ to get you through...
these practices doesn't necessarily produce ‘separate entities’ (indivis)
am i fantasizing creating a monolithic structure of ideas='qstn'>?
critique is an art that tangles with what you are proposing
(like an octopus in a ="trms"nttrm="failure,blur,plur,lurk,tallur,slur">lure)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="trms">stories that can ="trms">interrupt death (of our time, ="trms">anthropo="trms">cene, etc.)
(='thdf'>example of biology-="trms">story into culture-="trms">story='lgc'>: (1) ladder of evolution ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> progress (2) sperm/egg ="trms">story ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> gender performance)
to change ="trms">stories so that they are more livable
we live ="trms">stories
to make mistakes as fast as possible
... move across earth space and ="trms">narrative space
="trms">situated ="trms">stories
they can't tell everything, but what is needed here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugium_(population_biology)
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="trms">ontological choreography
vital ="trms">sort of play that the participants invent out of a ="trms">history of body and mind they in="trms">herit
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
possible performances
='strcls'>*two doors, ='qstn'>?, talk, model, puppet
='strcls'>*using stop-motion animation, clay formation, ="trms">material ="trms">animal facial properties
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
seeing a car crashing, is seeing a ="trms">causation, seeing a reasoning, is that logos='qstn'>? is it logos when we see a physical experimentation='qstn'>?
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Haraway='lgc'>]
="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%">
the established (dis)order is NOT necessary!
grips of necessity
(the real does/did not have to be or happen that way. the ‘real’ is the result of ="trms">contingencies and it can be undone by working the ="trms">contingencies, with ="trms">skill.)
laboring bodies, playing bodies, ="trms">sensuous bodies
(feminism='lgc'>:) you can't get freedom outside of mortality
="prgrph">-theology, the negative way of knowing, the necessary discipline of ="trms">positive affirmation in order to know what is not knowable, is a very helpful tradition
when it comes to ="trms">language we, humans, will always win over the ="trms">animals.
we will always be the ones who control the law, the ="trms">database.
(all is bad news both for the charismatic end="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">angered Bangali tiger and the individual chicken in the food industry.)
fight the divisions and ="trms">differences
we are in a very bad place for ="trms">animals and woman
can we do without ="trms">instrumentalization='qstn'>?
="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%">
="trms">categories of killable='lgc'>--the ="trms">question of how we kill
the ="trms">question of one's-own-old-hat
regarding what you are against='lgc'>: we might find ourselves properly addressing a particular issue but having no ability to make political connection, to think beyond the ="trms">categories
='strcls'>*thinking='lgc'>: a ="trms">materia="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list practice with other thinkers='lgc'>--done best as ="trms">storytelling
for me politics is that to be able to locate ways of life that deserves work, that which deserve op="trms">position, that which deserve our curiosity
="large lg5" stl="font-size:146%">
dis="trms">embodiment is a ="trms">technologically produced effect='lgc'>--many people are very ="trms">skillful in creating that effect ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> effects that are also ="trms">affect/="trms">affectional
(="ppl">="ppl">Haraway on ="trms">writing the cyborg manifesto) SK
the physiological state of neutrality is an ="trms">affective state
(='thdf'>the notion that violent and passion counts as ="trms">affect and neutrality is without ="trms">affect is chemically bizarre) ='lgc'>-- ="trms">neuro-chemistry of a certain kind of self-collection
refusing the division between ="trms">material and im="trms">material
to call information-="trms">world im="trms">material is wrong
(this is the base of ='mywrk'>my work related to ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway)
in the case of vision='lgc'>: the ="trms">material and the ="trms">semiotic always implode ='lgc'>[the ="trms">apparatus and the flesh='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the effect of ='strcls'>*dis="trms">embodiment is a ="trms">technologically produced effect='strcls'>* (that is also always ="trms">affectional) (we have to get good at producing it)
='lgc'>[...so she was among (1983 ="ppl">Marxist) feminists (and the figure of cyborg is al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready in circulation for her='lgc'>--about the ="trms">questions of reproduction ="trms">technologies related to the ="trms">situation of wome[...]