Ereignis: 0, (Max.: 500+)

[...]itions of intentionality<lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc>
<lsts clss="lsts lst1">one makes say (lss='at'>@lss="frds scrmbld">Sven)
lsts> <lsts clss="lsts lst1">one makes ask
lsts> <lsts clss="lsts lst1">one puts oneself ‘in’ the place of
lsts> <lsts clss="lsts lst1">one doesn't lss="trms">interpret
lsts> <lsts clss="lsts lst1">one experiments
lsts> <lsts clss="lsts lst1">
lsts> <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> these are perhaps non-immediate form of knowllss="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge
<lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> these practices inscribe the lss="trms">animal and human in the lss="trms">world of “speaking” <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>lss='at'>@lss="frds scrmbld">Marialena<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>
<lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> these are “perspectives” that “populate” our lss="trms">world

(each) <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>ls clss='strcls'>*ls><lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>perspective is made up of lss="trms">translation of intentionsls clss='strcls'>*ls>
(lss="trms">animal breeders are perspectivists)


lss="trms">situations of the exchange <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>ld>~ld>lgc>=lgc> lss="trms">situations of subjectivity <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> adopting perspectives (<lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> <lgc clss='lgc'><<lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>lgc>) judge intentions <lgc clss='lgc'>}lgc><lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> ‘lss="trms">response’

<lrg clss="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>ls clss='strcls'>*ls><lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>lss="trms">intersubjectivity<lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc> accepting the proposal of subjectivity; becoming what the other suglss="trms">gests; acting in the manner in which the other addresses you <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc><lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> my lss="nms">apass bow and arrow, was about this suglss="trms">gestivity<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>

the lss="trms">apparatus of lss="trms">question (that you suglss="trms">gest,) activates some modes of existence rather than others
lrg>
...shared perspectives, shared intelligences and intentions, resemblances, inversions and exchanges of properties (between humans and lss="trms">animals)

lrg>lbrkr stl="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................lbrkr>

my practice and work on lss="nms">ajayeb is grounded in the lss="trms">history and lss="trms">materiality of lss="trms">scientific practices

lrg>lbrkr stl="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................lbrkr>

(lss="nms">ajayeb's) particular and exceptional lss="trms">nature

lrg>lbrkr stl="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................lbrkr>

(l clss="ppl">l clss="ppl">Despretl>l>)

lss="trms">anthropo-lss="trms">zoo-genetic” <lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc> a practice that constructs lss="trms">animals and human

(how can i design an lss="trms">apparatus for lss="nms">ajayeb) to perform availabilitylss='qstn'>?
(build) lss="trms">questions that construe and construct signs that ‘make a lss="trms">world’ for the lss="trms">animal (entity of the lss="nms">ajayeb)
lss="prgrph">-how can i offer possible lss="trms">interesting becoming to the lss="trms">animals of lss="nms">ajayeb, in offering a way for them to lss="trms">articulate the lss="trms">system, (not to make a lss="trms">system that lss="trms">articulates them)

(in experimenting with lss="nms">ajayeb) how can i involve my body, involve my knowllss="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge, involve my lss="trms">responsibility, involve my futurelss='qstn'>?
lss="prgrph">-how to let them adopt melss='qstn'>?
lss="prgrph">-to produce an lss="nms">ajayeb body to allow a lss="nms">ajayeb lss="trms">world to lss="trms">affect me

the lss="trms">world of lss="nms">ajayeb is a richly lss="trms">articulated lss="trms">world <lgc clss='lgc'>=/=lgc> a lss="trms">world of enthusiastic automata (one who is only moved by itself) observing strange and mute creatures

lrg>lbrkr stl="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................lbrkr>

<lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>Mersad al-ebad<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc> tabaye-i طبایعی (lss="trms">materialss="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list)


lss="trms">historical lss="trms">specificity(s) of lss="trms">animal-human lss="trms">relationship



(worst-)lss="trms">translated lss="trms">science

lrg>lbrkr stl="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................lbrkr>

<lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>l clss="ppl">l clss="ppl">Harawayl>l>, Queering the non/human<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>

<lrg clss="large lg1" stl="font-size:124%"> ‘companion’ <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>she starts by showing the dlss="trms"nttrm="danger,stranger">anger of the term like any other term<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>
lrg>
reducing type is among other things at the heart of racism
types<lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc> colonised, enslaved, non-citizen, lss="trms">animal, refugee, <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>etc.<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>, typological female reduced to her reproductive function,

secular lss="trms">semiotics (never nourished uslss='qstn'>?)

queering<lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc> the job of undoing ‘normallss="trms">categories, <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>lss="trms">sorting operations<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>

...patterning, consequences, and the possibility of lss="trms">response.
queer, off-lss="trms">category, sf lss="trms">worlding
(what are the SF lss="trms">worldings of lss="nms">ajayeblss='qstn'>?<lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>SF as building alternative lss="trms">ontologies. finding absent but possible lss="trms">presents<lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>whether lss="trms">presented as elsewheres or other times. “<lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>...<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>an elsewhere from which lss="trms">different <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>...<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc> lss="trms">articulations of lss="trms">naturecultures and alterity could be explored.”)

“The one who would be normal, in a lss="trms">category of his own” <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> ends badly

(human lss="trms">scientist's) deadly one-way test<lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc> unable to recognize the lss="trms">presence of the lss="trms">trapped one <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> (for him) no one is at home in the lss="trms">categorically Other


<lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>Seed Bag<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>

...the problem of destruction and wounded flourishing<lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>not simply survival<lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>in exile, diaspora, abduction, and transportation<lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>the earthly gift-burden of the descendents of slaves, refugees, immigrants, lss="trms">travelers, and of the indigenous too.

(In the feminist SF mode,) lss="trms">matter is never “mere” medium to the “informing” seed;

Homebody / lss="trms">traveler

...disruptive details of good lss="trms">stories that don't know how to finish

lrg>lbrkr stl="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................lbrkr>

<lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>l clss="ppl">l clss="ppl">Baradl>l><lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>

<lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>...<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc> relss="trms">membering is not a replay of a string of moments, but an enlivening and reconfiguring of lss="trms">past and future that is larger than any individual. <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>...<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc> The lss="trms">past is never finished. It cannot be wrapped up like a package, or a scraplss="trms">book, or an acknowledgment; we never leave it and it never leaves us behind.

<lrg clss="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%"> l clss="ppl">l clss="ppl">Baradl>l>'s mother's lss="trms">question<lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc> “what good is there in offering recognition that can't be recognizedlss='qstn'>?
lrg>
<lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>...<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc> there is only the ongoing practice of being open and ls clss='strcls'>*ls>alive to each(other)ls clss='strcls'>*ls> meeting

“How to disrupt patterns of thinking that see the lss="trms">past as finished and the future as not ours or only ourslss='qstn'>?


<lrg clss="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%"> lrg>
ls clss='strcls'>*ls>lss="trms">measurement
ls clss='strcls'>**ls> the lss="trms">nature of lss="trms">nature depends on the lss="trms">apparatus that lss="trms">measure it
ls clss='strcls'>***ls><lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> which lss="trms">measurements are at use in lss="nms">ajayeblss='qstn'>?
(what constitutes a lss="trms">measurement for whatlss='qstn'>?)

Blickmaschinen gaze system visuality vision technique observer perspective situated knowledges positionality [source: Werner Nekes collection] the stranlss="trms">gest idea<lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc> that we have access to cultural relss="trms">presentations and their content (that we lack toward the things relss="trms">presented) (<lgc clss='lgc'>=/=lgc> “lss="trms">agential realss="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list lss="trms">ontology” barad-posthumanist.pdf) <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>l clss="ppl">l clss="ppl">Foucaultl>l>'s “words and things” is the name of the game<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc> <lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc><lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> lss='at'>@lss="frds scrmbld">Aela, perhaps we can begin with a lss="trms">different starting point, other than the old idea of “humanity's own captivity within lss="trms">language<lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>the starting place of the lss="trms">lss="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics of relss="trms">presentation,” perhaps it would be better to begin with a lss="trms">different lss="trms">lss="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics... <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc><lgc clss='lgc'>{lgc>the term ‘lss="trms">lss="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics’ (far from being the deep olss="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of high philosophy) actually comes olss="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginally from (the lss="trms">writings of) l clss="ppl">Aristotll>e on physics, rearranged three centuries after his death by l clss="ppl">Andronicusl> of Rhodes<lgc clss='lgc'>}lgc><lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>

lss="trms">materiality itself is always allss="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready figured within a lss="trms">linguistic domain as its condition of possibility(lss='qstn'>?(!))
<lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc> (lss='qstn'>?(!)) <lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc> a lss="trms">contingent lss="trms">question pregnant with lss="trms">wonder<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>
<lgc clss='lgc'>[lgc>my starting point in my lss="trms">lecture/performance is with the concern (warned by l clss="ppl">Nietzschel>) that lss="trms">language is being granted too much power, tendency to take grammar too lss="trms">seriously <lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc> allowing lss="trms">linguistic structure to shape or determine our understanding <lgc clss='lgc'>{lgc><lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> lss="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigs<lgc clss='lgc'>}lgc>
believing that ‘subject’ <lgc clss='lgc'>+lgc> ‘predicate structure of lss="trms">language’ (<lgc clss='lgc'>~lgc> grammatical lss="trms">categories) <lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>reflects<lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> (a lss="trms">prior lss="trms">ontological reality of) substance and attribute (<lgc clss='lgc'>~lgc> underlying structure of the lss="trms">world) (<lgc clss='lgc'>=/=lgc> ls clss='strcls'>*ls>lss="trms">contingency ls clss='strcls'>*ls>lss="trms">rhetoric);, <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> still in the 16th century europe (pointed by l clss="ppl">l clss="ppl">Foucaultl>l>) lss="trms">language was simply “one of the lss="trms">figurations of the lss="trms">world” <lgc clss='lgc'>=/=lgc> “lss="trms">language as medium"<lgc clss='lgc'>]lgc>

ls clss='strcls'>*ls>performativity (the way i am understanding it using l clss="ppl">l clss="ppl">Baradl>l>'s words) <lgc clss='lgc'>=/=lgc> the lss="trms">excessive power granted to lss="trms">language to determine what is real
lss="prgrph">-a contestation of the unexamined habits of mind that grant lss="trms">language and other forms of relss="trms">presentation more power in determining our lss="trms">ontologies
lss="prgrph">-lss="trms">questions of corlss="trms">respondence between description and reality <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> lss="trms">questions of lss="trms">ontology, lss="trms">materiality, and lss="trms">agency. (the things i am busy with in lss="nms">apass)
lss="prgrph">-(discursive dimensions inlss="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clude) lss="trms">questions of meaning, intelligibility, significance, identity formation, and power
lss='prcnt'>% l clss="ppl">Austinl>'s speech acts, lss="trms">relationships between saying and doing <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> l clss="ppl">Derridl>a's poststructuralss="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list amendments <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> l clss="ppl">Butlerl> (with l clss="ppl">l clss="ppl">Foucaultl>l>'s understanding of the productive effects of regulatory power) in theorizing lss='thdf'>the notion of identity performativity <lgc clss='lgc'>{lgc>lss='at'>@lss="frds scrmbld">Xiri, we understand gender not as a thing or a set of free-floating attributes, not as an essence<lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>but rather as a “doing”<lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc> “gender is itself a kind of becoming or activity ... gender ought not to be conceived as a noun or a substantial thing or a static cultural marker, but rather as an incessant and repeated action of some lss="trms">sort” <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> with this regard what lss="trms">questions should lss="frds scrmbld">Xiri ask her subjectslss='qstn'>?<lgc clss='lgc'>}lgc>

<lrg clss="large lg5" stl="font-size:135%"> <lgc clss='lgc'>{lgc> practice of relss="trms">presentation <lgc clss='lgc'>=/=lgc> relss="trms">presented entity <lgc clss='lgc'>}lgc><lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> this “<lgc clss='lgc'>=/=lgc>” is lss="trms">ontological <lgc clss='lgc'>==>lgc> lss="trms">question of accuracy (of relss="trms">presentation) <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> lss="trms">scientific knowllss="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge objectivity
lrg>
focus on the lss="trms">nature lss='and'>& production of lss="trms">scientific knowllss="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge (<lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> mediates our access to the lss="trms">material lss="trms">world) <lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>(lss="trms">science-studies)<lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> dynamics of the actual practice of lss="trms">science <lgc clss='lgc'>}lgc><lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> ongoing patterns of lss="trms">situated activity

lss="prgrph">-ls clss='strcls'>*ls>olss="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of “appearance”ls clss='strcls'>*ls>-
...with l clss="ppl">Democritusl>'s atomic theory emerges the possibility of a gap between relss="trms">presentation and lss="trms">presented. (lss='thdf'>the idea that something “appears”)
lss="prgrph">-l clss="ppl">Democritusl><lgc clss='lgc'>:lgc>
<lsts clss="lsts lst1">atomism (<lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc>lss='qstn'>? cornerstone of lss="trms">modern lss="trms">science)
lsts> <lsts clss="lsts lst1">democracy (<lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc>lss='qstn'>? cornerstone of lss="trms">modern politics)
lsts> <lgc clss='lgc'>}lgc><lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> lss='thdf'>the idea that the lss="trms">world is lss="trms">composed of individuals with separately attributable propertiesls clss='strcls'>****ls> (<lgc clss='lgc'>==>lgc> l clss="ppl">Newtonl>ian physics of independent objects, lss='at'>@lss="frds scrmbld">Heike)

ls clss='strcls'>*ls>l clss="ppl">Newtonl>ian framework <lgc clss='lgc'><lgc clss='lgc'>--lgc>>lgc> meaphysics of individualism[...]