[...]="prgrph">-='strcls'>*o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigins of “appearance”='strcls'>*-
...with ="ppl">Democritus's atomic theory emerges the possibility of a gap between re="trms">presentation and ="trms">presented. (='thdf'>the idea that something “appears”)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Democritus='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•atomism (='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? cornerstone of ="trms">modern ="trms">science)
="lsts lst1">•democracy (='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='qstn'>? cornerstone of ="trms">modern politics)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='thdf'>the idea that the ="trms">world is ="trms">composed of individuals with separately attributable properties='strcls'>**** (='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ="ppl">Newtonian physics of independent objects, ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Heike)

='strcls'>*="ppl">Newtonian framework ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> meaphysics of individualism
="lstsrd">1- that the ="trms">world is ="trms">composed of individual objects with individually determinate boundaries and properties whose well-defined values can be re="trms">presented by abstract universal concepts that have determinate meanings independent of the ="trms">specifices of practice (='lgc'>--this is exactly what ="frds scrmbld">Marialena should be carefull about='lgc'>: abstract univerality of ‘="trms">language,’ and the independency of her ‘recorder’)
="lstsrd">2- that ="trms">measurement involves continuous determinable ="trms">interactions such as the values of the properties obtained can properly be assigned to the pre="trms">measurement properties of objects separate from the ="trms">agencies of observation

(='strcls'>*)concept='lgc'>: ="trms">specific ="trms">material arrangements, concepts are defined by the circumstances required for their ="trms">measurement

(is ="frds scrmbld">Luisa's “wholesomeness” also about a feeling for inseparability='qstn'>?)


="large lg2" stl="font-size:111%"> deployments of power ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>--> body='lgc'>--='lgc'>{bodies, functions, physiological processes, sensations, pleasures,='lgc'>}

="trms">matter is not an end product, rather an active factor in further ="trms">materializations
(='strcls'>*** ="trms">matter ="trms">materializes ='strcls'>***)
="trms">matter's ongoing ="trms">historicity

precise ="trms">causal ="trms">nature of productive practices ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ="trms">differential constitutions are marked


="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>: a host of ="trms">material-discursive forces

='strcls'>*for ="nms">ajayeb i need to rework notions of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•discursive practices
="lsts lst1">•="trms">materialization
="lsts lst1">•="trms">agency
="lsts lst1">•="trms">causality
='strcls'>*without='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•re="trms">sorting to the optics of transparency
="lsts lst1">•the ="trms">geometric of absolute exteriority or ="trms">interiority
="lsts lst1">•theorization of human as either pure cause or pure effect


='strcls'>*any entity's ="trms">ontology (its cast identity) is always open for future's reworkings='strcls'>* (="ppl">="ppl">Barad)


adding a ="trms">Greek fused syntactical molding to the individual, ‘trans-’ is not enough, we have to make the postulation of individuality unthinkable, and that needs work
='lgc'>{how to make things unthinkable='qstn'>? not available to think with. what should be an “unthinkable” theory of ="trms">relations='qstn'>?='lgc'>}

(="ppl">Descartes's ="trms">epistemology ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">presentationa="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list structure of words, knowers, and things)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> transparency of ="trms">measurement (transparency of ="trms">language) ='lgc'>=/= ="ppl">Bohr's ="trms">epistemological framework (after his ="trms">="trms">empirical findings of an inherent discontinuity in ="trms">measurement ='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--='prcnt'>%> wave-particle duality paradox) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~-> ="ppl">="ppl">Barad's “="trms">causal ="trms">relationship between ="trms">specific ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusionary practices ="trms">embodied as ="trms">specific ="trms">material con="trms">figurations of the ="trms">world ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= discursive practices, (con)="trms">figurations rather than “words"='lgc'>] and ="trms">specific ="trms">material ="trms">phenomena ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ="trms">relations rather than “things"='lgc'>]”

(='strcls'>*)="trms">position (='lgc'>~ ="trms">specific physical arguments, ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= well-defined abstract concepts, in="trms">herit attribute of independently existing objects='lgc'>]='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='gtrw'>go to critique of ‘="trms">positionality’)
“="trms">position” only has meaning when a ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigid ="trms">apparatus with fixed parts is used (='thdf'>for example a ruler is nailed to a fixed table in the laboratory ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> establishing a fixed frame of reference for specifying “="trms">position.”) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> any ="trms">measurement of “="trms">position” using this ="trms">apparatus cannot be attributed to some abstract independently existing “object” but rather is a property of the ‘="trms">phenomenon’ ='lgc'>: ='strcls'>***the inseparability of “observed object” and “="trms">agencies of observation”='strcls'>***
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">simultaneous indeterminacy of “="trms">position” and “momentum” ='lgc'>[='strcls'>*momentum='strcls'>*='lgc'>: ="trms">material arrangement involving movable parts='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> deconstructing the ="trms">material ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion of “="trms">position” and “momentum"='lgc'>]

(='strcls'>*)="trms">phenomena='lgc'>: primary ="trms">epistemological unit, the ="trms">ontological inseparability of ="trms">agentially ="trms">intra-acting “components” (="ppl">="ppl">Barad); ="trms">ontologically primitive ="trms">relations; ="trms">relations without preexisting ‘="trms">relata’(='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ="trms">mutual ="trms">ontological dependencies ='lgc'>=/= independent entities)
="lsts lst1">•(="trms">specific) ="trms">intra-action ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> ="trms">relata-within-="trms">phenomena
="lsts lst1">•(="trms">specific) ="trms">agential ="trms">intra-action ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> boundaries and properties of components of ="trms">phenomena become determinate ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ="trms">phenomena
(='strcls'>*)="trms">apparatus='lgc'> = ="trms">phenomena ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= inscription devices, ="trms">scientific ="trms">instruments set in place before the action, machines that mediate the dialectic of resistance and accommodation, neutral probes of ="trms">natural ="trms">world, structures that deterministically impose some particular outcome,='lgc'>]
="prgrph">-="trms">apparatus='lgc'>: “dynamic (re)configurings of the ="trms">world, ="trms">specific ="trms">agential practices/="trms">intra-actions/performances through which ="trms">specific ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusionary boundaries are enacted”
(perpetually) open to='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•rearrangements
="lsts lst1">•re="trms">articulations
="lsts lst1">•(and other) reworkings (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='lgc'>[in my amazon project:='lgc'>] getting the ="trms">instrumentation to work in a particular way for a particular purpose)

(boundaries are always ‘enacted,’ not ‘made’)

(='strcls'>*)reality='lgc'>: “things"-in-="trms">phenomena, ongoing ebb and flow of ="trms">agency ='strcls'>*****
="prgrph">-shifting boundaries and properties that stabilize and destabilize

(='strcls'>*)="trms">world='lgc'>: a dynamic process of ="trms">intra-activity in the “ongoing reconfiguring of locally determinate ="trms">causal structures” ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= ="trms">contingency='lgc'>] with determinate boundaries, properties, meanings, and patterns of marks on bodies ='strcls'>*****

(='strcls'>*)universe='lgc'>: ="trms">agential ="trms">intra-activity in its becoming

(='strcls'>*)word='lgc'>: ="trms">material-discursive practices ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> boundaries are constituted (='thdf'>for example the ="trms">differential constitution of “humans” and “nonhumans”; ='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Varinia)
='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> meaning (='lgc'>=/= ideational, andisheyi اندیشه‌ای‌) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">specific ="trms">material (re)configuring of the ="trms">world

(='strcls'>*)discourse='lgc'>: that which constrains and enables what can be said, practices that define what counts as meaningful (statement)='strcls'>***
(learning from ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault, discursive practices are the local ="trms">socio="trms">historical ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= transcendental, ="trms">phenomenological, ideational='lgc'>] ="trms">material conditions that enable and constrain disciplinary knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge practices) ='strcls'>*actual ="trms">historically ="trms">situated ="trms">social conditions='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•speaking
="lsts lst1">•="trms">writing
="lsts lst1">•thinking
="lsts lst1">•calculating
="lsts lst1">•="trms">measuring
="lsts lst1">•filtering
="lsts lst1">•concentrating
="lsts lst1">•
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> statements ='lgc'>+ subjects emerge from a field of possibilities ='lgc'>=/= statement as utterance of (o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginating) consciousness of a unified subject

(='strcls'>*)discursive practices='lgc'>: ="trms">specific ="trms">material (re)configurings of the ="trms">world ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> local determinations of boundaries, properties, and meanings are ="trms">differentially enacted

(='strcls'>*)meaning='lgc'>: ongoing performance of the ="trms">world in its ="trms">differential intelligibility (='lgc'>=/= a property of individual/groups of words)

='strcls'>**local ="trms">causal structures ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> one component ='lgc'>{effect='lgc'>} is marked by another component ='lgc'>{cause='lgc'>} (in their ‘="trms">differential ="trms">articulation’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= intelligibility='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> in ="trms">science this is called “="trms">measurement”

(="trms">question at ="frds scrmbld">Juan's work on clay='lgc'>:) (what could challenge='qstn'>?) the re="trms">presentationalism's construal of ="trms">matter as a passive blank site awaiting the active inscription of culture (<='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> the ="trms">relationship between ="trms">materiality and discourse ="trms">positioned as one absolute exteriority) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Butler's incomplete reworking of “="trms">causality” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> her (="trms">anthropocentric, ensan ashrafe makhlughat انسان اشرف مخلوقات) theory of ="trms">materiality is limited to an account of the ="trms">materialization of human body ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the construction of the c="trms">ontours of the human body
(="ppl">Butler='lgc'>: performativity understood as iterative ="trms">citationality)
(intelligibility is not always a human-based affair)

="large lg1" stl="font-size:142%"> (="trms">question of ‘="trms">agency’ and ‘="trms">causality’ at ="frds scrmbld">Sana and ="frds scrmbld">Hoda='lgc'>:) what possibilities exist (for ="trms">agency) for ="trms">intervening in the ="trms">world of becoming='qstn'>?
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda='lgc'>: there is no ="trms">geometrical ="trms">relation of absolute exteriority between (nor an idea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic collapse of) a “="trms">causal ="trms">apparatus” and a “body effected” ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>****an ongoing topological dynamics that en="trms">folds the spacetime mani="trms">fold upon itself='strcls'>**** ='lgc'><== ="trms">apparatuses of bodily production are also part of the ="trms">phenomena they produce
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**future is radically open at every turn='strcls'>** (="ppl">="ppl">Barad) ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> her notion of overdetermination (جبر jabr='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> what if she use “constraint” instead of “determinist”='qstn'>? esrar/ezterar ='lgc'>]='lgc'>='lgc'>--> enactment of a ="trms">causal structure ='lgc'>: particular possibilities for acting exist at every moment
="prgrph">-a term for ="frds scrmbld">Hoda='lgc'>: “="trms">causally deterministic power structures”

(='strcls'>*)="trms">agency='lgc'>: changes in the ="trms">apparatuses of bodily production='strcls'>***
enactment of iterative changes to particular practices through the dynamics of ="trms">intra-activity

="large lg6" stl="font-size:109%"> (='strcls'>*)objectivity='lgc'>: being accountable to marks on bodies (='lgc'>=/= exteriority)
="trms">agential separability ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> objectivity
(="ppl">="ppl">Barad, ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway, ="ppl">Kirby, Rouse, ="ppl">Bohr='lgc'>:) there is no such (“knower”) exterior observational point
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Laleh='lgc'>: we are not observers outside the ="trms">world, not simply located at particular places ‘in’ the ="trms">world (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">positionality)

(="trms">question at ="frds scrmbld">Aela='lgc'>:) the ="trms">geometry of absolute ="trms">interiority ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> reduction of effect to its cause, ="trms">nature ="trms">ontologically distinct from culture
(that there is no preexistent ="trms">nature)
(="frds scrmbld">Aela's ="trms">interest in='qstn'>?) spatiality='lgc'>: (characteristics of enclosures ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- concerned with shapes and sizes) ‘="trms">geometry’ ='lgc'>=/= ‘topology’ (investigates ="trms">questions of ='strcls'>*connectivity='strcls'>* and ='strcls'>*boundaries='strcls'>*)

='strcls'>***it is the very existence of ‘="trms">finitude’ that gets defined as ‘="trms">matter’

="trms">narcissistic bedtime ="trms">stories... (="trms">positioning of ="trms">materiality as either a given or a mere effect of human ="trms">agency)

(='strcls'>*)="trms">matter='lgc'>: substance in its ="trms">intra-active becoming
(='strcls'>*)performativity='lgc'>: iterative ="trms">intra-activity

“I'm trying to complicate the locatability of human identity as a here and now, as an enclosed and finished product='lgc'>[/project='lgc'>]” ='lgc'>~ “perspective essentialism”
...="trms">nature performs itself ="trms">differently
(="ppl">Kirby)


='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Barad:='lgc'>] ='strcls'>**="trms">onto-="trms">epistem-ology='strcls'>**='lgc'>: the study of practices of knowing in being
“="trms">epistemology ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">ontology” is a re="trms">verberation of a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics that assumes (inherent ="trms">differences='lgc'>:) “human ='lgc'>=/= nonhuman,” “subject ='lgc'>=/= object,” “mind ='lgc'>=/= body,” “="trms">matter ='lgc'>=/= discourse”...

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

what kind of alphabetico-numerical forefinger can i build that can press a ="trms">schizophrenic partial ="trms">systematizing of ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>?

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

so much (in ="nms">Iran's ="trms">literature) still awaits reflection and comprehension (-without comprehensiveness please!)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

...="trms"nttrm="search">archeology of dying in our civilization
(="trms"nttrm="search">archeology of our dying civilization)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Aristotle's ="trms">narrative='lgc'>: catharsis of emotions ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> first arousing pity and fear and then clearing them away

theories of ="trms">narrative='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•forma="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list theories (Russian)
="lsts lst1">•dialogical theories (="ppl">Bakhtinian)
="lsts lst1">•New Critical theories
="lsts lst1">•Chicago school, or neo-="ppl">Aristotlian theories
="lsts lst1">•psychoanalytic theories (="ppl">Freud, Kenneth Burke, ="ppl">Lacan, N. Abraham)
="lsts lst1">•hermeneutic and ="trms">phenomenological theories
="lsts lst1">•structura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list, ="trms">semiotic, and tropological theories
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Marxist and ="trms">sociological theories
="lsts lst1">•="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader-="trms">response theories
="lsts lst1">•poststructura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list and deconstructionist theories (Jacques ="ppl">Derrida, ="ppl">Paul ="ppl">de Man)
="lsts lst1">•feminist theories (="ppl">Martha ="ppl">="ppl">Kenney, ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway, ="ppl">="ppl">Stengers, ="ppl">="ppl">Hayward)
="lsts lst1">•
="lsts lst1">•

structura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list='lgc'>: that there are typical formal elements or “deep structures” to ="trms">narratives ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> complex performative dimension between the telling of ="trms">stories and what is told in them

(="ppl">Paul ="ppl">de Man='lgc'>:) “The paradigm for all texts consists of a figure (or a ="trms">system of figures) and its deconstruction. But since this model cannot be closed off by a final ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, it engenders, in its turn, a supplementary figural super="trms">position which ="trms">narrates the un="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readability of the ="trms">prior ="trms">narration.”

the analytic experience has a ="trms">narrative character='qstn'>? psychoanalytic dialogue ‘uncovers’ a certain kind of ="trms">narrative discontinuity maintained in the analysand's efforts
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> meaningful ="trms">narrative sequences,
and, recaptured ="trms">memory ='lgc'>: a ="trms">rhetorical product

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="prgrph">-the dominance of the ="trms">narrative ‘The O="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin’ ='lgc'>[Ursprung='lgc'>] when we tell ="trms">nature ="trms">story, when we call in ="trms">nature
="prgrph">-the dominance of the ="trms">narrative ‘The ="trms">Zoom’ when we tell ="trms">nature ="trms">story, (‘The Reveal’ ="trms">story)
="prgrph">-




ok, it is 06.03.2017, i need to set up a track of commentary, a monogamous ="trms">relation with ="nms">ajayeb
and unload the myth that i am going to do something new='lgc'>:

1st='lgc'>: send super-ego away and cleared out ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> no judgment
2nd='lgc'>: call the unengaged secretary to just ="trms">write
3rd='lgc'>: throw some ="trms">sort of sequencing on the page
4th='lgc'>: call the clean-up ="trms">agent
5th='lgc'>: at some point super-ego comes and checks it out
6th='lgc'>: negotiation with the super-ego

(="ppl">Avital,) start modest and small, ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening to my passion, collects some texts or passages that hold this or that motif that i like or am concerned with, go in there and do a ="trms">rhetorical ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, see what is going on in the ="trms">language, allow myself be ="trms">instructed and taught.

7th='lgc'>: wrap around the work, something of an ='strcls'>*infomercial,='strcls'>* there i can get a little ego in there, bring myself to the table and ="trms">situate myself in the ="trms">world of art/scholarship/thinking/creativity/etc. and say where i am, what ="trms">question do i bring to the table, what would be my ="trms">question mark, i am at the table taking my place and this is my ="trms">question mark, ="trms">situate myself (='lgc'>=/= autistic, dar-khod-mandegi در خود ماندگی; i can't spin out as kind of rouge and solitary satellite that no one can connect with. i have to make the connections, in a ="trms">world that is having debates and discursive encounters around my themes. i am ='strcls'>*in conversation='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">responding, quoting, tuning,) standing up for myself and my text, “fake it till you make it,” yes i need to re="trms">narcissize and build up, at this phase towards the end i need to perform being assertive and show what i have brought to the table, and if i don't know that then i ask someone to tell me what have i done='qstn'>? where does it belong='qstn'>? how can i ="trms">situate myself='qstn'>?

8th='lgc'>: sleep-walk, don't look down, don't wake myself up, don't ask why i am doing this

9th='lgc'>: (problematically ="ppl">Deleuzian='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*becoming woman='strcls'>*! (for ="ppl">Deleuze) all ="trms">writing involves you (no ="trms">matter how you are gendered or constructed or what you think you are) in becoming woman, which is to say the experience of a powerful sub="trms">mission and the ability to carry off the disappearance of ="trms">agency or ego kick, subjecting oneself (to the other) before becoming subject.
='lgc'>[(="ppl">="ppl">Hayward) woman='lgc'>: vibratory being='lgc'>: sensation ='lgc'>='lgc'><='lgc'>~='lgc'>~(creative-="trms">response)='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~> environment='lgc'>]

زن شو

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

wunderkammer, cabinet of curiosities, is about the ="trms">world unfinished

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

the prefixial ="trms">nature of ‘trans-’ ='lgc'>: across, into, through ='lgc'>: a pre="trms">positional force
Trans='strcls'>* foregrounds and intensifies the prehensile (گیرکننده), prefixial (pishvandi پیشوندی) ="trms">nature of ‘trans-’ and implies a suffixial (pasvandi پسوندی) space of attachment that is ="trms">simultaneously ="trms">generalizable and abstract yet its function can be enacted only when taken up by particular objects (="ppl">="ppl">Hayward ='and'>& ="ppl">Weinstein)
trans='strcls'>* (pre="trms">positionally oriented) “is the process through which thingness and beingness are constituted” ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] “marking the ‘with,’ ‘through,’ ‘of,’ ‘in,’ and ‘across’ that make life possible”
="lsts lst1">•="trms">materializes pre="trms">positional movements

the ‘human on board’ no longer possesses critical purchase, it no longer “delineates a normative standard of legibility,” “the elite status of being considered fully human” (how is it in ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>?)
(biopolitics of) de-, in-, non-, trans-

="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%"> a ‘turn’ (= a cause to move, a ="trms">difference in ="trms">position ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> a change in ="trms">nature) enables creatures to migrate from the margins to the center of theoretical ="trms">interrogatives

="ppl">="ppl">Haraway prefering (the energetic expressive capacity of) ‘with’ over ‘and’
="prgrph">-syntactical problem of ‘and’ raised to the power of n
="prgrph">-she puts the emphasis on with-ness ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to reinvigorate (tajdide niru تجدید نیرو) attention to ="trms">materiality but also ="trms">matter's ="trms">contingent force ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">intersectional ="trms">demands of assemblage
“and...and...and”
trans, speciating ="trms">technology, the drive for suffixial endpoints


(pre="trms">positional operations on suffixiated) assemblages of spacetime="trms">matterings

="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%">
='strcls'>**** terrible violence is directed to the non-existing, the never having existed


‘='strcls'>*’ (the asterisk) is paratactic (faghede ravabet فاقد روابط) (='lgc'>=/= conjunction,) it designates multiplication, it repurposes, displaces, renames, replicates, and intensifies terms, adding yet more texture, increased vitalization
="prgrph">-it is a ="trms">sensuous node
="prgrph">-making (my points) a com="trms">posite of ="trms">affects and percepts ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> speciation is always a cultivated ="trms">response ='strcls'>***

='strcls'>*="trms">trap='lgc'>: “means also mouth, or mode of utterance; it is the “O” curve of lips and throat that makes sounds phonic and names the apprehension of becoming bodily. A ="trms">trap, in weaving, is also a break in the th="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reads, an unraveling, loosening, unwinding that opens up space. When we think of spider webs, ="trms">trap is a silk net, a sticky mesh that registers sensation. For the spider, its ="trms">trap is its [...]