Ereignis: 0, (Max.: 500+)

[...] /> ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> meaning (='lgc'>=/= ideational, andisheyi اندیشه‌ای‌) ='lgc'>--> ="trms">specific ="trms">material (re)configuring of the ="trms">world

(='strcls'>*)discourse='lgc'>: that which constrains and enables what can be said, practices that define what counts as meaningful (statement)='strcls'>***
(learning from ="ppl">="ppl">Foucault, discursive practices are the local ="trms">socio="trms">historical ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= transcendental, ="trms">phenomenological, ideational='lgc'>] ="trms">material conditions that enable and constrain disciplinary knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge practices) ='strcls'>*actual ="trms">historically ="trms">situated ="trms">social conditions='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">speaking
="lsts lst1">="trms">writing
="lsts lst1">thinking
="lsts lst1">calculating
="lsts lst1">="trms">measuring
="lsts lst1">filtering
="lsts lst1">concentrating
="lsts lst1">
='lgc'>--> statements ='lgc'>+ subjects emerge from a field of possibilities ='lgc'>=/= statement as utterance of (o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">riginating) consciousness of a unified subject

(='strcls'>*)discursive practices='lgc'>: ="trms">specific ="trms">material (re)configurings of the ="trms">world ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> local determinations of boundaries, properties, and meanings are ="trms">differentially enacted

(='strcls'>*)meaning='lgc'>: ongoing performance of the ="trms">world in its ="trms">differential intelligibility (='lgc'>=/= a property of individual/groups of words)

='strcls'>**local ="trms">causal structures ='lgc'>--> one component ='lgc'>{effect='lgc'>} is marked by another component ='lgc'>{cause='lgc'>} (in their ‘="trms">differential ="trms">articulation’ ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>~= intelligibility='lgc'>]) ='lgc'>}='lgc'>--> in ="trms">science this is called “="trms">measurement”

(="trms">question at ="frds scrmbld">Juan's work on clay='lgc'>:) (what could challenge='qstn'>?) the re="trms">presentationalism's construal of ="trms">matter as a passive blank site awaiting the active inscription of culture (<='lgc'>='lgc'>~=> the ="trms">relationship between ="trms">materiality and discourse ="trms">positioned as one absolute exteriority) ='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~='lgc'>--> ="ppl">Butler's incomplete reworking of “="trms">causality” ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> her (="trms">anthropocentric, ensan ashrafe makhlughat انسان اشرف مخلوقات) theory of ="trms">materiality is limited to an account of the ="trms">materialization of human body ='lgc'>--> the construction of the c="trms">ontours of the human body
(="ppl">Butler='lgc'>: performativity understood as iterative ="trms">citationality)
(intelligibility is not always a human-based affair)

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%"> (="trms">question of ‘="trms">agency’ and ‘="trms">causality’ at ="frds scrmbld">Sana and ="frds scrmbld">Hoda='lgc'>:) what possibilities exist (for ="trms">agency) for ="trms">intervening in the ="trms">world of becoming='qstn'>?
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda='lgc'>: there is no ="trms">geometrical ="trms">relation of absolute exteriority between (nor an idea="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listic collapse of) a “="trms">causal ="trms">apparatus” and a “body effected” ='lgc'>--='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>****an ongoing topological dynamics that en="trms">folds the spacetime mani="trms">fold upon itself='strcls'>**** ='lgc'><== ="trms">apparatuses of bodily production are also part of the ="trms">phenomena they produce
='lgc'>}='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>**future is radically open at every turn='strcls'>** (="ppl">="ppl">Barad) ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda ='lgc'>--> her notion of overdetermination (جبر jabr='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>--> what if she use “constraint” instead of “determinist”='qstn'>? esrar/ezterar ='lgc'>]='lgc'>--> enactment of a ="trms">causal structure ='lgc'>: particular possibilities for acting exist at every moment
="prgrph">-a term for ="frds scrmbld">Hoda='lgc'>:="trms">causally deterministic power structures”

(='strcls'>*)="trms">agency='lgc'>: changes in the ="trms">apparatuses of bodily production='strcls'>***
enactment of iterative changes to particular practices through the dynamics of ="trms">intra-activity

(='strcls'>*)objectivity='lgc'>: being accountable to marks on bodies (='lgc'>=/= exteriority)
="trms">agential separability ='lgc'>=='lgc'>=> objectivity
(="ppl">="ppl">Barad, ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway, ="ppl">Kirby, Rouse, ="ppl">Bohr='lgc'>:) there is no such (“knower”) exterior observational point
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Laleh='lgc'>: we are not observers outside the ="trms">world, not simply located at particular places ‘in’ the ="trms">world (='lgc'>--> ="trms">positionality)

(="trms">question at ="frds scrmbld">Aela='lgc'>:) the ="trms">geometry of absolute ="trms">interiority ='lgc'>--> reduction of effect to its cause, ="trms">nature ="trms">ontologically distinct from culture
(that there is no preexistent ="trms">nature)
(="frds scrmbld">Aela's ="trms">interest in='qstn'>?) spatiality='lgc'>: (characteristics of enclosures ='lgc'><-- concerned with shapes and sizes) ‘="trms">geometry’ ='lgc'>=/= ‘topology’ (investigates ="trms">questions of ='strcls'>*connectivity='strcls'>* and ='strcls'>*boundaries='strcls'>*)

='strcls'>***it is the very existence of ‘="trms">finitude’ that gets defined as ‘="trms">matter

="large lg1" stl="font-size:135%"> ="trms">narcissistic bedtime ="trms">stories... (="trms">positioning of ="trms">materiality as either a given or a mere effect of human ="trms">agency)

(='strcls'>*)="trms">matter='lgc'>: substance in its ="trms">intra-active becoming
(='strcls'>*)performativity='lgc'>: iterative ="trms">intra-activity

“I'm trying to complicate the locatability of human identity as a here and now, as an enclosed and finished product='lgc'>[/project='lgc'>]='lgc'>~ “perspective essentialism”
...="trms">nature performs itself ="trms">differently
(="ppl">Kirby)


='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Barad:='lgc'>] ='strcls'>**="trms">onto-="trms">epistem-ology='strcls'>**='lgc'>: the study of practices of knowing in being
="trms">epistemology ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">ontology” is a re="trms">verberation of a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics that assumes (inherent ="trms">differences='lgc'>:) “human ='lgc'>=/= nonhuman,” “subject ='lgc'>=/= object,” “mind ='lgc'>=/= body,” “="trms">matter ='lgc'>=/= discourse”...

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

what kind of alphabetico-numerical forefinger can i build that can press a ="trms">schizophrenic partial ="trms">systematizing of ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>?

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

so much (in ="nms">Iran's ="trms">literature) still awaits reflection and comprehension (-without comprehensiveness please!)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

...="trms"nttrm="search">archeology of dying in our civilization
(="trms"nttrm="search">archeology of our dying civilization)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Aristotle's ="trms">narrative='lgc'>: catharsis of emotions ='lgc'>--> first arousing pity and fear and then clearing them away

theories of ="trms">narrative='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">forma="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list theories (Russian)
="lsts lst1">dialogical theories (="ppl">Bakhtinian)
="lsts lst1">New Critical theories
="lsts lst1">Chicago school, or neo-="ppl">Aristotlian theories
="lsts lst1">psychoanalytic theories (="ppl">Freud, Kenneth Burke, ="ppl">Lacan, N. Abraham)
="lsts lst1">hermeneutic and ="trms">phenomenological theories
="lsts lst1">structura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list, ="trms">semiotic, and tropological theories
="lsts lst1">="ppl">Marxist and ="trms">sociological theories
="lsts lst1">="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader-="trms">response theories
="lsts lst1">poststructura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list and deconstructionist theories (Jacques ="ppl">Derrida, ="ppl">Paul ="ppl">de Man)
="lsts lst1">feminist theories (="ppl">Martha ="ppl">="ppl">Kenney, ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway, ="ppl">="ppl">Stengers, ="ppl">="ppl">Hayward)
="lsts lst1">
="lsts lst1">

structura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list='lgc'>: that there are typical formal elements or “deep structures” to ="trms">narratives ='lgc'>--> complex performative dimension between the telling of ="trms">stories and what is told in them

(="ppl">Paul ="ppl">de Man='lgc'>:) “The paradigm for all texts consists of a figure (or a ="trms">system of figures) and its deconstruction. But since this model cannot be closed off by a final ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, it engenders, in its turn, a supplementary figural super="trms">position which ="trms">narrates the un="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readability of the ="trms">prior ="trms">narration.”

the analytic experience has a ="trms">narrative character='qstn'>? psychoanalytic dialogue ‘uncovers’ a certain kind of ="trms">narrative discontinuity maintained in the analysand's efforts
='lgc'>--> meaningful ="trms">narrative sequences,
and, recaptured ="trms">memory ='lgc'>: a ="trms">rhetorical product

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%">
="prgrph">-the dominance of the ="trms">narrative ‘The O="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin’ ='lgc'>[Ursprung='lgc'>] when we tell ="trms">nature ="trms">story, when we call in ="trms">nature
="prgrph">-the dominance of the ="trms">narrative ‘The ="trms">Zoom’ when we tell ="trms">nature ="trms">story, (‘The Reveal’ ="trms">story)
="prgrph">-



="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%">
ok, it is 06.03.2017, i need to set up a track of commentary, a monogamous ="trms">relation with ="nms">ajayeb
and unload the myth that i am going to do something new='lgc'>:

1st='lgc'>: send super-ego away and cleared out ='lgc'>--> no judgment
2nd='lgc'>: call the unengaged secretary to just ="trms">write
3rd='lgc'>: throw some ="trms">sort of sequencing on the page
4th='lgc'>: call the clean-up ="trms">agent
5th='lgc'>: at some point super-ego comes and checks it out
6th='lgc'>: negotiation with the super-ego

(="ppl">Avital,) start modest and small, ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening to my passion, collects some texts or passages that hold this or that motif that i like or am concerned with, go in there and do a ="trms">rhetorical ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, see what is going on in the ="trms">language, allow myself be ="trms">instructed and taught.

7th='lgc'>: wrap around the work, something of an ='strcls'>*infomercial,='strcls'>* there i can get a little ego in there, bring myself to the table and ="trms">situate myself in the ="trms">world of art/scholarship/thinking/creativity/etc. and say where i am, what ="trms">question do i bring to the table, what would be my ="trms">question mark, i am at the table taking my place and this is my ="trms">question mark, ="trms">situate myself (='lgc'>=/= autistic, dar-khod-mandegi در خود ماندگی; i can't spin out as kind of rouge and solitary satellite that no one can connect with. i have to make the connections, in a ="trms">world that is having debates and discursive encounters around my themes. i am ='strcls'>*in conversation='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--> ="trms">responding, quoting, tuning,) standing up for myself and my text, “fake it till you make it,” yes i need to re="trms">narcissize and build up, at this phase towards the end i need to perform being assertive and show what i have brought to the table, and if i don't know that then i ask someone to tell me what have i done='qstn'>? where does it belong='qstn'>? how can i ="trms">situate myself='qstn'>?

="large lg5" stl="font-size:122%"> 8th='lgc'>: sleep-walk, don't look down, don't wake myself up, don't ask why i am doing this

9th='lgc'>: (problematically ="ppl">Deleuzian='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*becoming woman='strcls'>*! (for ="ppl">Deleuze) all ="trms">writing involves you (no ="trms">matter how you[...]