[...]to particular practices through the dynamics of ="trms">intra-activity

(='strcls'>*)objectivity='lgc'>: being accountable to marks on bodies (='lgc'>=/= exteriority)
="trms">agential separability ='lgc'>==> objectivity
(="ppl">="ppl">Barad, ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway, ="ppl">Kirby, Rouse, ="ppl">Bohr='lgc'>:) there is no such (“knower”) exterior observational point
='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Laleh='lgc'>: we are not observers outside the ="trms">world, not simply located at particular places ‘in’ the ="trms">world (='lgc'>--> ="trms">positionality)

(="trms">question at ="frds scrmbld">Aela='lgc'>:) the ="trms">geometry of absolute ="trms">interiority ='lgc'>--> reduction of effect to its cause, ="trms">nature ="trms">ontologically distinct from culture
(that there is no preexistent ="trms">nature)
(="frds scrmbld">Aela's ="trms">interest in='qstn'>?) spatiality='lgc'>: (characteristics of enclosures ='lgc'><-- concerned with shapes and sizes) ‘="trms">geometry’ ='lgc'>=/= ‘topology’ (investigates ="trms">questions of ='strcls'>*connectivity='strcls'>* and ='strcls'>*boundaries='strcls'>*)

='strcls'>***it is the very existence of ‘="trms">finitude’ that gets defined as ‘="trms">matter’

="trms">narcissistic bedtime ="trms">stories... (="trms">positioning of ="trms">materiality as either a given or a mere effect of human ="trms">agency)

(='strcls'>*)="trms">matter='lgc'>: substance in its ="trms">intra-active becoming
(='strcls'>*)performativity='lgc'>: iterative ="trms">intra-activity

="large lg2" stl="font-size:110%"> “I'm trying to complicate the locatability of human identity as a here and now, as an enclosed and finished product='lgc'>[/project='lgc'>]” ='lgc'>~ “perspective essentialism”
...="trms">nature performs itself ="trms">differently
(="ppl">Kirby)


='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Barad:='lgc'>] ='strcls'>**="trms">onto-="trms">epistem-ology='strcls'>**='lgc'>: the study of practices of knowing in being
“="trms">epistemology ='lgc'>=/= ="trms">ontology” is a re="trms">verberation of a ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysics that assumes (inherent ="trms">differences='lgc'>:) “human ='lgc'>=/= nonhuman,” “subject ='lgc'>=/= object,” “mind ='lgc'>=/= body,” “="trms">matter ='lgc'>=/= discourse”...

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

what kind of alphabetico-numerical forefinger can i build that can press a ="trms">schizophrenic partial ="trms">systematizing of ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>?

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg1" stl="font-size:113%"> so much (in ="nms">Iran's ="trms">literature) still awaits reflection and comprehension (-without comprehensiveness please!)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

...="trms"nttrm="search">archeology of dying in our civilization
(="trms"nttrm="search">archeology of our dying civilization)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Aristotle's ="trms">narrative='lgc'>: catharsis of emotions ='lgc'>--> first arousing pity and fear and then clearing them away

theories of ="trms">narrative='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•forma="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list theories (Russian)
="lsts lst1">•dialogical theories (="ppl">Bakhtinian)
="lsts lst1">•New Critical theories
="lsts lst1">•Chicago school, or neo-="ppl">Aristotlian theories
="lsts lst1">•psychoanalytic theories (="ppl">Freud, Kenneth Burke, ="ppl">Lacan, N. Abraham)
="lsts lst1">•hermeneutic and ="trms">phenomenological theories
="lsts lst1">•structura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list, ="trms">semiotic, and tropological theories
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">Marxist and ="trms">sociological theories
="lsts lst1">•="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reader-="trms">response theories
="lsts lst1">•poststructura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list and deconstructionist theories (Jacques ="ppl">Derrida, ="ppl">Paul ="ppl">de Man)
="lsts lst1">•feminist theories (="ppl">Martha ="ppl">="ppl">Kenney, ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway, ="ppl">="ppl">Stengers, ="ppl">="ppl">Hayward)
="lsts lst1">•
="lsts lst1">•

structura="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list='lgc'>: that there are typical formal elements or “deep structures” to ="trms">narratives ='lgc'>--> complex performative dimension between the telling of ="trms">stories and what is told in them

(="ppl">Paul ="ppl">de Man='lgc'>:) “The paradigm for all texts consists of a figure (or a ="trms">system of figures) and its deconstruction. But since this model cannot be closed off by a final ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, it engenders, in its turn, a supplementary figural super="trms">position which ="trms">narrates the un="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readability of the ="trms">prior ="trms">narration.”

the analytic experience has a ="trms">narrative character='qstn'>? psychoanalytic dialogue ‘uncovers’ a certain kind of ="trms">narrative discontinuity maintained in the analysand's efforts
='lgc'>--> meaningful ="trms">narrative sequences,
and, recaptured ="trms">memory ='lgc'>: a ="trms">rhetorical product

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="prgrph">-the dominance of the ="trms">narrative ‘The O="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin’ ='lgc'>[Ursprung='lgc'>] when we tell ="trms">nature ="trms">story, when we call in ="trms">nature
="prgrph">-the dominance of the ="trms">narrative ‘The ="trms">Zoom’ when we tell ="trms">nature ="trms">story, (‘The Reveal’ ="trms">story)
="prgrph">-




ok, it is 06.03.2017, i need to set up a track of commentary, a monogamous ="trms">relation with ="nms">ajayeb
and unload the myth that i am going to do something new='lgc'>:

1st='lgc'>: send super-ego away and cleared out ='lgc'>--> no judgment
2nd='lgc'>: call the unengaged secretary to just ="trms">write
3rd='lgc'>: throw some ="trms">sort of sequencing on the page
4th='lgc'>: call the clean-up ="trms">agent
5th='lgc'>: at some point super-ego comes and checks it out
6th='lgc'>: negotiation with the super-ego

(="ppl">Avital,) start modest and small, ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listening to my passion, collects some texts or passages that hold this or that motif that i like or am concerned with, go in there and do a ="trms">rhetorical ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, see what is going on in the ="trms">language, allow myself be ="trms">instructed and taught.

7th='lgc'>: wrap around the work, something of an ='strcls'>*infomercial,='strcls'>* there i can get a little ego in there, bring myself to the table and ="trms">situate myself in the ="trms">world of art/scholarship/thinking/creativity/etc. and say where i am, what ="trms">question do i bring to the table, what would be my ="trms">question mark, i am at the table taking my place and this is my ="trms">question mark, ="trms">situate myself (='lgc'>=/= autistic, dar-khod-mandegi در خود ماندگی; i can't spin out as kind of rouge and solitary satellite that no one can connect with. i have to make the connections, in a ="trms">world that is having debates and discursive encounters around my themes. i am ='strcls'>*in conversation='strcls'>* ='lgc'>--> ="trms">responding, quoting, tuning,) standing up for myself and my text, “fake it till you make it,” yes i need to re="trms">narcissize and build up, at this phase towards the end i need to perform being assertive and show what i have brought to the table, and if i don't know that then i ask someone to tell me what have i done='qstn'>? where does it belong='qstn'>? how can i ="trms">situate myself='qstn'>?

8th='lgc'>: sleep-walk, don't look down, don't wake myself up, don't ask why i am doing this

9th='lgc'>: (problematically ="ppl">Deleuzian='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*becoming woman='strcls'>*! (for ="ppl">Deleuze) all ="trms">writing involves you (no ="trms">matter how you are gendered or constructed or what you think you are) in becoming woman, which is to say the experience of a powerful sub="trms">mission and the ability to carry off the disappearance of ="trms">agency or ego kick, subjecting oneself (to the other) before becoming subject.
='lgc'>[(="ppl">="ppl">Hayward) woman='lgc'>: vibratory being='lgc'>: sensation ='lgc'><='lgc'>~='lgc'>~(creative-="trms">response)='lgc'>='lgc'>~='lgc'>~> environment='lgc'>]

زن شو

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

wunderkammer, cabinet of curiosities, is about the ="trms">world unfinished

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="large lg3" stl="font-size:111%"> the prefixial ="trms">nature of ‘trans-’ ='lgc'>: across, into, through ='lgc'>: a pre="trms">positional force
Trans='strcls'>* foregrounds and intensifies the prehensile (گیرکننده), prefixial (pishvandi پیشوندی) ="trms">nature of ‘trans-’ and implies a suffixial (pasvandi پسوندی) space of attachment that is ="trms">simultaneously ="trms">generalizable and abstract yet its function can be enacted only when taken up by particular objects (="ppl">="ppl">Hayward ='and'>& ="ppl">Weinstein)
trans='strcls'>* (pre="trms">positionally oriented) “is the process through which thingness and beingness are constituted” ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] “marking the ‘with,’ ‘through,’ ‘of,’ ‘in,’ and ‘across’ that make life possible”
="lsts lst1">•="trms">materializes pre="trms">positional movements

the ‘human on board’ no longer possesses critical purchase, it no longer “delineates a normative standard of legibility,” “the elite status of being considered fully human” (how is it in ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>?)
(biopolitics of) de-, in-, non-, trans-

a ‘turn’ (= a cause to move, a ="trms">difference in ="trms">position ='lgc'>==> a change in ="trms">nature) enables creatures to migrate from the margins to the center of theoretical ="trms">interrogatives

="ppl">="ppl">Haraway prefering (the energetic expressive capacity of) ‘with’ over ‘and’
="prgrph">-syntactical problem of ‘and’ raised to the power of n
="prgrph">-she puts the emphasis on with-ness ='lgc'>--> to reinvigorate (tajdide niru تجدید نیرو) attention to ="trms">materiality but also ="trms">matter's ="trms">contingent force ='lgc'>--> ="trms">intersectional ="trms">demands of assemblage
“and...and...and”
trans, speciating ="trms">technology, the drive for suffixial endpoints

="large lg4" stl="font-size:110%">
(pre="trms">positional operations on suffixiated) assemblages of spacetime="trms">matterings


='strcls'>**** terrible violence is directed to the non-existing, the never having existed


="large lg5" stl="font-size:140%"> ‘='strcls'>*’ (the asterisk) is paratactic (faghede ravabet فاقد روابط) (='lgc'>=/= conjunction,) it designates multiplication, it repurposes, displaces, renames, replicates, and intensifies terms, adding yet more texture, increased vitalization
="prgrph">-it is a ="trms">sensuous node
="prgrph">-making (my points) a com="trms">posite of ="trms">affects and percepts ='lgc'>--> speciation is always a cultivated ="trms">response ='strcls'>***

='strcls'>*="trms">trap='lgc'>: “means also mouth, or mode of utterance; it is the “O” curve of lips and throat that makes sounds phonic and names the apprehension of becoming bodily. A ="trms">trap, in weaving, is also a break in the th="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reads, an unraveling, loosening, unwinding that opens up space. When we think of [...]