[...]ies
="lsts lst1">•performance='lgc'>: what it would be to know together
="lsts lst1">•="trms">sociality='lgc'>: that which joins ="trms">categorically separate mode of ="trms">agencies
="lsts lst1">•

='at'>#my findings/="trms">questions, so far='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">animal subjectivity ='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? human ="trms">imagination
="lsts lst1">•="trms">bestiary ='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? ="trms">affect ='lgc'>+ ="trms">episteme
="lsts lst1">•medieval ="trms">bestiaries='lgc'>: ="trms">world ='lgc'>~= ="trms">phenomena
="lsts lst1">•de="trms">finition ='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? ="trms">ontological choreography ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">worlds are created
="lsts lst1">•="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphores of self ='lgc'>~-> ="nms">body image ='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? image of ="trms">world
="lsts lst1">•="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list ='lgc'>~=='qstn'>? reason
="lsts lst1">•

I found myself oriented towards a kind of ‘multi="trms">species ethnography’='lgc'>: a new way of ="trms">writing and mode of research in which creatures previously appearing on the margins of ="trms">interest='lgc'>--as part of the landscape, as food for humans, as ="trms">symbols (for mystic projects)='lgc'>--have been pressed into the foreground of ="trms">interest.
(what are my) ="trms">symbolic ='lgc'>+ ="trms">symbiotic attachments
what/who is coughing, counting, working, ="trms">communicating sited between divine and bestial in ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-is my ="nms">ajayeb a (dead/alive) multi="trms">species art project='qstn'>? studying Indo-Arab-="nms">Iranian illuminated manuscripts as to be ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading a paper in ="trms">ecology or molecular biology or art.

unlike ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alex,Alert,Aleph,Alessi">Alex Arteaga's ="trms">question of “inevitable altruism” ='lgc'>{started from “conscious human subjects” and ended there='lgc'>} (in his talk 30.05.2017 ="nms">apass,) I would insist on giving an account of the ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors of ‘self’ in the ="trms">history of body and mind (that ="trms">matters to ‘you’) ='lgc'>[my findings of self='lgc'>: maginc lantern, iceberg's tip (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> unconsciousness), wasteland/="trms">wilderness, greedy ="trms">beast within, ... ='lgc'>{='lgc'>='lgc'>--> these are all (classical) basis for “higher” cognitive capacities='lgc'>}='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[also I am against ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Alex,Alert,Aleph,Alessi">Alex's notion of “destablizing stabilities as the task of artistic research.” I choose to refuse to put what is in flux against what is stable or attempting to stabilize. (I am in alignment with ="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King sharpening for me that) we constantly share our ="trms">stage, settings, performances, sensoria, reenactments among ="trms">agencies and ="trms">species, creating varying stabilities, some fragile, some robust='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*account='lgc'>--synonymous with='lgc'>: description, information, ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list, reason, record, statement, ="trms">story, sum, tale
="prgrph">-a contractual ="trms">relationship
="prgrph">-giving an itemized account of recent transactions and resulting balance (of your ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphors='lgc'> = ="trms">material-discursive ="trms">apparatuses that are ="trms">materializing your found ="trms">="trms">empirical objects)
="prgrph">-accountability is always also about remaking those ="trms">relations that produced your objects
="prgrph">-detailed explanation of money held in trust, to count, enumerate='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{telling ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? enumerating='lgc'>}
counting your senses
='strcls'>*accountability is about your ‘import’ functions (like in a programming ="trms">language when you import a library of functions)
 ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> count='lgc'>: an ="trms">agent of ="trms">sorting that separates units or groups of a collection ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">list, ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">listed ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> to have importance and worth ='lgc'>~-> country ='lgc'>='lgc'>---='lgc'>{='qstn'>? unexpected countries='lgc'>}
 ='lgc'>--0='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ‘count’ is also a word ="trms">technologically tethered, o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of computing


(="ppl">Kirksey > ="ppl">Leigh ="ppl">="ppl">Star) to begin with the ="trms">question, ‘cui bono='qstn'>?’ (for whose benefit='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>=/= to begin with a celebration of the fact of human/nonhuman mingling

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%">
my ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">Rigs diagrams are ‘swarms’='qstn'>? -a multitude of ="trms">different creative ="trms">agents
="nms">ajayeb.net (how can it be='lgc'>:) not a website but a “para-site”
="lsts lst1">•am i creating an ego (for ="nms">ajayeb) in my ="nms">ajayeb.net='qstn'>? if yes, that would be ="trms">interesting how='qstn'>?

topos/topic of hypertext, spatial character of electronic ="trms">writing
topic ='lgc'>[from ="trms">Greek ‘topos’='lgc'>: a place, in ancient ="trms">rhetoric used to refer to commonplaces, conventional units, or ="trms">methods of thought='lgc'>] exist in a ="trms">writing space that is not only a visual surface but also a ="trms">data structure in the computer ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Hypertext='lgc'>: “is not the ="trms">writing of a place, but rather a ="trms">writing with places, spatially realized topics.” (="ppl">Bolter < ="ppl">Hubert)
="prgrph">-in my hypertext, which ="trms">writing ="trms">materials, cognitive mappings, itineraries of ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading, textual stability, loops and reductions are addressed='qstn'>?

="lsts lst1">•in ="nms">ajayeb.net the so-called url address or location bar, is itself a control panel, a graphical user ="trms">interface widget; how did i come to use “='qstn'>?q=” ='lgc'>: ="trms">rhetorics of ="trms">technologized inquiry in place before i even could think about how do I allow my objects constituted by “='qstn'>?”, “q” and “=” of the ="trms">language and grammar of ="trms">internet
="lsts lst1">•(when i uploaded my hypertext i faced immediately the big ="trms">data='lgc'>:) google webmasters tools is my first ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readership, it ="trms">communicates its ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading with me; (did i have a desire to make the hypertext for a machine='qstn'>?) who/what is doing the ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading (in the ="trms">world of big ="trms">data)='qstn'>? the ="trms">interpretive work that is going on, in a ="trms">writing and ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading done by computers ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ethical and ="trms">social values
="lsts lst1">•url pased in face="trms">book post, results into a link to فلزیاب، مطالب علمی و آموزشی / مدار فلزیاب و دستگاه فلزیاب تضمینی, a series of websites for selling treasure finders, finding ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metal under the ground, ganj, and so on...

the English (since second ="trms">world war) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (1) ="trms">international ="trms">lingua franca of high ="trms">technology, (2) the ="trms">language of computers
="prgrph">-in ="nms">ajayeb.net the enforcement of standard spelling and even grammar is week or nonexistent
="prgrph">-the amount of ="trms">linguistic replicators that circulate through my ="nms">ajayeb hypertext are bound to a colloquial English, they are nevertheless “English”. but this English is being changed and adapted by my foreign use in ="trms">different ways
="prgrph">-a flourishing of a neo-English and ="trms">Farsi miniaturization of Eng


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

sometimes the answer to the ="trms">question is to investigate the ="trms">question itself
="ppl">="ppl">Despret asking with Rowell='lgc'>: how can we be sure that primates have a more complex ="trms">social life='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how did we build the comparison='qstn'>?='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>--="ppl">="ppl">Latour='lgc'>='lgc'>--> if they are so intelligent, how did they get the ‘chance’ to become so ‘well ="trms">="trms">equipped’='qstn'>?
(in this ="trms">question can be raised an unexpected ="trms">animal)
='lgc'>[(how) the makhlughat/مخلوقات/creatures/beings of ="nms">ajayeb were well ="trms">="trms">equipped (with ="trms">agency, will, intention,)='lgc'>]


sheep, ‘the epitome of the silly ="trms">animal’

(همگون دوستی hamgune-dusti, khod-no dusti خود نوع دوستی) altruism, in ="trms">birds (and humans)

Zahavi calling his ="trms">birds, ‘refugees,’ non-territorial individuals

quest for ="trms">social ‘status’ and prestige in Babblers
(="trms">birds know that) signals for prestige are costly

in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusive fitness

porousness of the (="trms">semiotic) demarcation ='lgc'>[="trms">wild/domesticated ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quasi-="trms">wild/quasi-domesticated='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (successively and recursively) unstable and living ="trms">tropes='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we should probably redefine our (creaturely) subjects in cor="trms">respondence to (="ppl">Leibnizian) ‘quasi-causes’
quasi-feral

="large lg14" stl="font-size:135%"> the ‘unexpected’ often un="trms">folds in an unexpected way. (Despert > ="ppl">Leibniz)

="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism is always someone's ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism
="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism is always someone's common sense


='lgc'>{(becoming ="trms">interested in) individual (detailed nuances of) ="trms">difference ='lgc'>=/= when “model” becomes the goal='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> standard model (of ="trms">natural ="trms">science) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a pre="trms">supposed ="trms">specific idea of “="trms">science” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> use a ="trms">technical, highly theoretical ="trms">language ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">epistemological objectification of ="trms">animals (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">presentation of ="trms">animals as ="trms">natural objects) ='lgc'>~= desubjectified ="trms">animals


(safeguards of) ="trms">authorship and meaning (won't allow ="ppl">Attar) ='lgc'>==ask='lgc'>='lgc'>==> |X| what is your “subject” ="trms">interested in='qstn'>? what ="trms">matters to them='qstn'>?
(="ppl">Attar never looked for varieties='lgc'>--in anecdotes, in little ="trms">stories, in individual ="trms">bird biographies ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{these are the ="trms">materials that I am collecting from my family telegram group posted ="trms">animal videos='lgc'>})

thinking with the ="trms">bird
looking with it (='lgc'>=/= looking at it) ='lgc'>--and='lgc'>='lgc'>--> and knowing its intentions

both humans and nonhumans create ="trms">narratives, rather than just telling them. (there are ="trms">socialities in which) they both create/disclose new scripts ='lgc'>~~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inhabiting an existential ="trms">world ='lgc'>~-> full of actors and living adventures, that give them='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•a ="trms">history
="lsts lst1">•a bibliography
="lsts lst1">•a personality
="lsts lst1">•
(and) a full repertoire of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•will
="lsts lst1">•intention
="lsts lst1">•="trms">agency
="lsts lst1">•

="large lg10" stl="font-size:129%">
to recreate similarities between ="trms">scientific and mundane practices (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- neccesory for making companionship)

='strcls'>*="trms">agency is an ="trms">="trms">equipment

='strcls'>*(="trms">greeting) rituals ='lgc'>~=perform='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">social links='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> assess reliability
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> I am ="trms">interested in ritual in its mundane sense ='lgc'>=/= performance-art ritual ='lgc'>{='strcls'>*='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> who are they in the (becoming in) ritual='qstn'>? (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> who is “="frds scrmbld">Evamaria” in her performance-art ritual='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> which meaning you ="trms">embody='qstn'>?


the ="trms">difference between ="trms">response and reaction (not so clear ='lgc'>[as I thought='lgc'>]) ='at'>#passive reacting beings...
(this ="trms">difference) structures the way we see “passivity”

(tracing) “objectivity(s)” (in one's own culture's dominant ="trms">epistemologies) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “audience” poker-face in art ='and'>& ="trms">science (-adviced to be as neutral as possible, to be unavailable, to be no one) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= ="nms">harem ='lgc'>--(is about)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> domesticating practices='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (in order to query the ways) audience habituating the performer / ="trms">scientists habituating their ="trms">animals='strcls'>*='lgc'>], ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">scientists are getting it, why the artists and their audience don't get it!='qstn'>? ='lgc'>}='lgc'>--(="trms">ontological risk)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***the performer is a ="trms">social subject='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>: (="trms">category changes in everyday life)
="lsts lst1">•when I am by myself='lgc'>: I am an orangutan, sometimes snake, I am ‘something’
="lsts lst1">•when I am with others='lgc'>: I turn to human
="lsts lst1">•when I am “objective”='lgc'>: I am off-="trms">category, I am not ‘something’ (-super strange!)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the ‘Other’ ='lgc'>[not only the police officer,='lgc'>] always estizah (="trms">interpellation استيضاح) you(='qstn'>?)

it is very ="trms">interesting the way ="ppl">="ppl">Despret is working (on the field) with ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway's (intuitive genius) analysis

="trms">scientist's will to be ‘no-one’ that would prevent any ="trms">interaction

="large lg1" stl="font-size:131%"> (="ppl">="ppl">Despret's constructivist and non-relativist ="trms">translation of ‘the ways ="trms">animals act are the consequences of the observer's gaze’='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*="trms">animal actions are ="trms">responsible consequences='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[(='strcls'>*)performance='lgc'>: the ="trms">responsible consequence of a (no less) ="trms">responsible gaze='lgc'>]

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Verran, knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge economy
knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edger always ="trms">authored
cross-cultural knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge practices



="prgrph">-physis, “I bring forth”, “I produce”, “I make to grow” (='lgc'>=/= “="trms">techne” in ="ppl">Aristotlian sense)
X-physis='lgc'>: a process which sticks out in the direction X ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how this ="trms">morpheme has come to mean (since mid-15th century) “form” and “="trms">nature”='qstn'>? (this is about thinking of making)
“physis” requires the ="trms">different perspectives of the four causes (aitia)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">material ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> source of ="trms">matter
="lsts lst1">•efficient ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> power/motion
="lsts lst1">•formal ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> containing its form
="lsts lst1">•final ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> end


="trms">zoo="trms">poiesis ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">zoo="trms">poetics, explorations of how ="trms">animals (="trms">zoo) shape the making of text, study of ‘the ="trms">literary ="trms">animal’

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King

“flexible knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges” on the ="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of validity ='heart'>♥ (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> almost invalid='strcls'>*)

fantasy of education
culture wars
intellectual enterpreneurs
upheavals and connectivities of globalization

changing patterns of ="trms">interaction

(aren't we here to) change the patterns of ="trms">interaction
(aren't we here to) change the faith of letters and ="trms">love ="trms">stories

reenactments (are fantasy practices and realities) ='lgc'>=/= simple, accessible, and democratized (knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge)

“layers of locals and globals”

="large lg10" stl="font-size:118%"> ='lgc'>[somehow I couldn't feel in his long term project what is ="frds scrmbld">Kobe's ="trms">relation to='lgc'>] (processes and their product that require) developing and learning new ="trms">skills, pleasures, and ="trms">communities

="prgrph">-at the end many of us (are busy with or) want to (or inhabit the “will to”) modelling reality
this is also what ="nms">ajayeb was busy with

='strcls'>***we are always doing both “purification” and “hybridization”
='lgc'>[='lgc'>]we direct our attention ="trms">simultaneously to the work of purification and the work of hybridization ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> we immediately stop being wholly ="trms">modern ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*our future begins to change='strcls'>* / ='strcls'>*our ="trms">past begins to change='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb (“hybrids down below” ='lgc'>{="ppl">="ppl">Latour='lgc'>}) is precisely about (this kind of) transformation of ="trms">pasts and futures='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> meeting companion ="trms">species ='lgc'>{if ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb doesn't teach me how to meet the dog in my street, the pigeon on my window, the juju on the ="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of my paper, what is it good for then='qstn'>?!='lgc'>}

(='strcls'>*)companion ="trms">species='lgc'>: assemblages of living and non-living ‘="trms">species’='strcls'>***
(="frds scrmbld">Janina is all along engaged with companion ="trms">species)


(an strategy='lgc'>:) allocation of ="trms">responsibility for grasping information

="large lg14" stl="font-size:121%"> assemblage at various levels and sublevels characterizes ='strcls'>*explanations='strcls'>* and ='strcls'>*practices='strcls'>*

="trms">techno="trms">scientific tsunami that will ob="trms">literate ="trms">prior practices and cultures...

(learning to) see old and new forms of confusions, docility, subjectivity, morality, ="trms">agency, empowerment (when we are together)
(to recognize and make) new sites of negotiation


="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>: bodies of Minoan figurines “wear” the appropriate gender for a ="trms">specific ritual practice, they don't “bear” gender (as their essential feature) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> gender salience is always in ="trms">question, not a propor pre="trms">supposition
“sex has emerged as a salient attribute of the pot's character as a pot”

when ="trms">zoo="trms">morphic figures are ="trms">present...

="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">zoo="trms">morphic figures with their salient attributes are not “purposed” necessarily being to en="trms">code their belief-="trms">system ="trms">onto objects that we may ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read today='lgc'>--like ="trms">story-board='lgc'>--but rather to make ="trms">interventions into the ="trms">world of human-nonhuman ="trms">relations. to either assist or resist such transformations
='lgc'>[terms sharpened with ="ppl">Alberti ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King='lgc'>]


museum studies


(="ppl">="ppl">Hayward='lgc'>:) freedom ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> initiative in shaping a ="trms">narrative, a visible body, where one is able to engage and resist ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Xiri='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> contradicts itself because one is really not free from the policing of the physical body ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> coming into a ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] body (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> reality and disillusion in public spaces) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ ="trms">narrative, flesh, is filled with ="trms">memory, emotions, and complexity ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*="trms">crafting a space for existence may involve='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•un="trms">folding ="trms">history
="lsts lst1">•mapping normative processes
="lsts lst1">•immersing a “body” in vulnerability (='strcls'>*)

="large lg6" stl="font-size:103%">
deploy ='lgc'>=/= un="trms">veiling
="trms">sort out ='lgc'>=/= debunking هدايت


glocalizing

="large lg10" stl="font-size:125%">
="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="ppl">="ppl">Hayward='lgc'>: ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] assembling ="trms">apparatuses for en="trms">folding visions of ="trms">instrumental, subjective and cognitive ="trms">technologies among ciliated (مودار, ریشه‌دار) bodies

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

="trms">technologies of the ="trms">literal

grain of analysis, timescale, noting/creating hybrid objects of study
='lgc'>[comparing the incomparable ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> lumping ='lgc'>--then='lgc'>='lgc'>--> splitting='lgc'>]

='strcls'>***starting off a research project which eventually hopes to have something to say about that hybrid “thing”='strcls'>*** ...with some despised ="trms">members of a particular time period (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> switching those who count as major or minor characters), promises to make it possible to build in ='strcls'>*a range of genders (not just two), a range of ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies, a range of self-effacing acts, and a range of publics='strcls'>*, while working from a particular place and time

='strcls'>***there are many ="trms">different ="trms">interests creating the ="trms">pasts='strcls'>***, the possible ="trms">worlds...


(="ppl">Leigh ="ppl">="ppl">Star > ="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King > ="frds">Sina) “comparing the incomparable”

here i am trying an outline of my ="trms">interrelated research practices in a preliminary character, the ="trms">intersection of which I am just at the beginning to understand


="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>: ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies of the 12th century ="nms">Iran

plain style

soing naked as a sign

dress and address

="trms">ecology of ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies


(="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King='lgc'>:) ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies='lgc'>: ideologies layered in time and space ='strcls'>* under which ="trms">writing has been divided ='lgc'>[also cannot be divided='lgc'>] from other generations of cultural meaning

myriad hybrid forms, commingling in ="trms">material and ideological proliferations
(with ="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King's ="trms">interest in women's ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies)

“="trms">presentist”='lgc'>: a practice of classification and ="trms">categorization to access ="trms">pasts

continuities and local discontinuities ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> is ‘continuity’ (always) a universal abstraction='qstn'>?='strcls'>**


relative universalization

prescrptions for speech and silence


="large lg3" stl="font-size:110%"> what is gained and what is lost when “tidying up the archive”='qstn'>? (a german problem)

prescriptions for speech and silence

“politeness ="trms">phenomena”

‘plain speech’ for Quakers='lgc'>: rejection of ‘idle’ speech. preaching was another version of sacrificing seld-will, and was appropriate speech.
public preaching in particular was also a challenge to ="trms">social ="trms">relations and ="trms">interaction ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a challenge to gender, speaking public was a cultural humiliation for individual women ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the Quaker women practiced preaching as a personal humiliation ="trms">instrumental to their own salvation ='lgc'>[! in a weird way i also did this to my self='lgc'>] ='at'>#becoming woman='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{a liquefying aspect='lgc'>: “womanhood” was used ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorically to identify those who could not preach, the surrender of (male) ="trms">authority to God by men was “female”
="lsts lst1">•inhibiting woman's prophetic ="trms">agencies
="lsts lst1">•“lack of disci[...]