[...]
porousness of the (="trms">semiotic) demarcation ='lgc'>[="trms">wild/domesticated ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> quasi-="trms">wild/quasi-domesticated='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (successively and recursively) unstable and living ="trms">tropes='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we should probably redefine our (creaturely) subjects in cor="trms">respondence to (="ppl">Leibnizian) ‘quasi-causes’
quasi-feral
the ‘unexpected’ often un="trms">folds in an unexpected way. (Despert > ="ppl">Leibniz)
="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism is always someone's ="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism
="trms">anthropo="trms">morphism is always someone's common sense
="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%">
='lgc'>{(becoming ="trms">interested in) individual (detailed nuances of) ="trms">difference ='lgc'>=/= when “model” becomes the goal='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> standard model (of ="trms">natural ="trms">science) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a pre="trms">supposed ="trms">specific idea of “="trms">science” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> use a ="trms">technical, highly theoretical ="trms">language ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">epistemological objectification of ="trms">animals (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> re="trms">presentation of ="trms">animals as ="trms">natural objects) ='lgc'>~= desubjectified ="trms">animals
(safeguards of) ="trms">authorship and meaning (won't allow ="ppl">Attar) ='lgc'>==ask='lgc'>='lgc'>==> |X| what is your “subject” ="trms">interested in='qstn'>? what ="trms">matters to them='qstn'>?
(="ppl">Attar never looked for varieties='lgc'>--in anecdotes, in little ="trms">stories, in individual ="trms">bird biographies ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{these are the ="trms">materials that I am collecting from my family telegram group posted ="trms">animal videos='lgc'>})
thinking with the ="trms">bird
looking with it (='lgc'>=/= looking at it) ='lgc'>--and='lgc'>='lgc'>--> and knowing its intentions
both humans and nonhumans create ="trms">narratives, rather than just telling them. (there are ="trms">socialities in which) they both create/disclose new scripts ='lgc'>~~='lgc'>='lgc'>--> inhabiting an existential ="trms">world ='lgc'>~-> full of actors and living adventures, that give them='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•a ="trms">history
="lsts lst1">•a bibliography
="lsts lst1">•a personality
="lsts lst1">•
(and) a full repertoire of='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•will
="lsts lst1">•intention
="lsts lst1">•="trms">agency
="lsts lst1">•
to recreate similarities between ="trms">scientific and mundane practices (='lgc'><='lgc'>-- neccesory for making companionship)
='strcls'>*="trms">agency is an ="trms">="trms">equipment
='strcls'>*(="trms">greeting) rituals ='lgc'>~=perform='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ="trms">social links='strcls'>* ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> assess reliability
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> I am ="trms">interested in ritual in its mundane sense ='lgc'>=/= performance-art ritual ='lgc'>{='strcls'>*='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>--> who are they in the (becoming in) ritual='qstn'>? (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> who is “="frds scrmbld">Evamaria” in her performance-art ritual='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> which meaning you ="trms">embody='qstn'>?
the ="trms">difference between ="trms">response and reaction (not so clear ='lgc'>[as I thought='lgc'>]) ='at'>#passive reacting beings...
(this ="trms">difference) structures the way we see “passivity”
(tracing) “objectivity(s)” (in one's own culture's dominant ="trms">epistemologies) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> “audience” poker-face in art ='and'>& ="trms">science (-adviced to be as neutral as possible, to be unavailable, to be no one) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>=/= ="nms">harem ='lgc'>--(is about)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> domesticating practices='lgc'>] ='lgc'>[='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (in order to query the ways) audience habituating the performer / ="trms">scientists habituating their ="trms">animals='strcls'>*='lgc'>], ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">scientists are getting it, why the artists and their audience don't get it!='qstn'>? ='lgc'>}='lgc'>--(="trms">ontological risk)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>***the performer is a ="trms">social subject='strcls'>*** ='lgc'>: (="trms">category changes in everyday life)
="lsts lst1">•when I am by myself='lgc'>: I am an orangutan, sometimes snake, I am ‘something’
="lsts lst1">•when I am with others='lgc'>: I turn to human
="lsts lst1">•when I am “objective”='lgc'>: I am off-="trms">category, I am not ‘something’ (-super strange!)
='lgc'>}='lgc'>='lgc'>==> the ‘Other’ ='lgc'>[not only the police officer,='lgc'>] always estizah (="trms">interpellation استيضاح) you(='qstn'>?)
it is very ="trms">interesting the way ="ppl">="ppl">Despret is working (on the field) with ="ppl">="ppl">Haraway's (intuitive genius) analysis
="trms">scientist's will to be ‘no-one’ that would prevent any ="trms">interaction
(="ppl">="ppl">Despret's constructivist and non-relativist ="trms">translation of ‘the ways ="trms">animals act are the consequences of the observer's gaze’='lgc'>:) ='strcls'>*="trms">animal actions are ="trms">responsible consequences='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[(='strcls'>*)performance='lgc'>: the ="trms">responsible consequence of a (no less) ="trms">responsible gaze='lgc'>]
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="ppl">Verran, knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge economy
knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edger always ="trms">authored
cross-cultural knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge practices
="prgrph">-physis, “I bring forth”, “I produce”, “I make to grow” (='lgc'>=/= “="trms">techne” in ="ppl">Aristotlian sense)
X-physis='lgc'>: a process which sticks out in the direction X ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> how this ="trms">morpheme has come to mean (since mid-15th century) “form” and “="trms">nature”='qstn'>? (this is about thinking of making)
“physis” requires the ="trms">different perspectives of the four causes (aitia)='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•="trms">material ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> source of ="trms">matter
="lsts lst1">•efficient ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> power/motion
="lsts lst1">•formal ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> containing its form
="lsts lst1">•final ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> end
="trms">zoo="trms">poiesis ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">zoo="trms">poetics, explorations of how ="trms">animals (="trms">zoo) shape the making of text, study of ‘the ="trms">literary ="trms">animal’
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King
“flexible knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edges” on the ="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of validity ='heart'>♥ (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> almost invalid='strcls'>*)
fantasy of education
culture wars
intellectual enterpreneurs
upheavals and connectivities of globalization
changing patterns of ="trms">interaction
(aren't we here to) change the patterns of ="trms">interaction
(aren't we here to) change the faith of letters and ="trms">love ="trms">stories
reenactments (are fantasy practices and realities) ='lgc'>=/= simple, accessible, and democratized (knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge)
“layers of locals and globals”
='lgc'>[somehow I couldn't feel in his long term project what is ="frds scrmbld">Kobe's ="trms">relation to='lgc'>] (processes and their product that require) developing and learning new ="trms">skills, pleasures, and ="trms">communities
="prgrph">-at the end many of us (are busy with or) want to (or inhabit the “will to”) modelling reality
this is also what ="nms">ajayeb was busy with
='strcls'>***we are always doing both “purification” and “hybridization”
='lgc'>[='lgc'>]we direct our attention ="trms">simultaneously to the work of purification and the work of hybridization ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> we immediately stop being wholly ="trms">modern ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*our future begins to change='strcls'>* / ='strcls'>*our ="trms">past begins to change='strcls'>*
='lgc'>[='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb (“hybrids down below” ='lgc'>{="ppl">="ppl">Latour='lgc'>}) is precisely about (this kind of) transformation of ="trms">pasts and futures='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> meeting companion ="trms">species ='lgc'>{if ='mywrk'>my work on ="nms">ajayeb doesn't teach me how to meet the dog in my street, the pigeon on my window, the juju on the ="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge of my paper, what is it good for then='qstn'>?!='lgc'>}
(='strcls'>*)companion ="trms">species='lgc'>: assemblages of living and non-living ‘="trms">species’='strcls'>***
(="frds scrmbld">Janina is all along engaged with companion ="trms">species)
(an strategy='lgc'>:) allocation of ="trms">responsibility for grasping information
assemblage at various levels and sublevels characterizes ='strcls'>*explanations='strcls'>* and ='strcls'>*practices='strcls'>*
="trms">techno="trms">scientific tsunami that will ob="trms">literate ="trms">prior practices and cultures...
(learning to) see old and new forms of confusions, docility, subjectivity, morality, ="trms">agency, empowerment (when we are together)
(to recognize and make) new sites of negotiation
="ppl">Alberti='lgc'>: bodies of Minoan figurines “wear” the appropriate gender for a ="trms">specific ritual practice, they don't “bear” gender (as their essential feature) ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> gender salience is always in ="trms">question, not a propor pre="trms">supposition
“sex has emerged as a salient attribute of the pot's character as a pot”
when ="trms">zoo="trms">morphic figures are ="trms">present...
="large lg6" stl="font-size:118%">
="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">zoo="trms">morphic figures with their salient attributes are not “purposed” necessarily being to en="trms">code their belief-="trms">system ="trms">onto objects that we may ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">read today='lgc'>--like ="trms">story-board='lgc'>--but rather to make ="trms">interventions into the ="trms">world of human-nonhuman ="trms">relations. to either assist or resist such transformations
='lgc'>[terms sharpened with ="ppl">Alberti ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King='lgc'>]
museum studies
(="ppl">="ppl">Hayward='lgc'>:) freedom ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> initiative in shaping a ="trms">narrative, a visible body, where one is able to engage and resist ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Xiri='lgc'>] ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> contradicts itself because one is really not free from the policing of the physical body ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> coming into a ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] body (='lgc'>='lgc'>==> reality and disillusion in public spaces) ='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ ="trms">narrative, flesh, is filled with ="trms">memory, emotions, and complexity ='lgc'>[='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Hoda='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*="trms">crafting a space for existence may involve='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•un="trms">folding ="trms">history
="lsts lst1">•mapping normative processes
="lsts lst1">•immersing a “body” in vulnerability (='strcls'>*)
deploy ='lgc'>=/= un="trms">veiling
="trms">sort out ='lgc'>=/= debunking هدايت
glocalizing
="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading ="ppl">="ppl">Hayward='lgc'>: ='lgc'>[...='lgc'>] assembling ="trms">apparatuses for en="trms">folding visions of ="trms">instrumental, subjective and cognitive ="trms">technologies among ciliated (مودار, ریشهدار) bodies
="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................
="trms">technologies of the ="trms">literal
grain of analysis, timescale, noting/creating hybrid objects of study
='lgc'>[comparing the incomparable ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> lumping ='lgc'>--then='lgc'>='lgc'>--> splitting='lgc'>]
='strcls'>***starting off a research project which eventually hopes to have something to say about that hybrid “thing”='strcls'>*** ...with some despised ="trms">members of a particular time period (='lgc'>='lgc'>--> switching those who count as major or minor characters), promises to make it possible to build in ='strcls'>*a range of genders (not just two), a range of ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies, a range of self-effacing acts, and a range of publics='strcls'>*, while working from a particular place and time
='strcls'>***there are many ="trms">different ="trms">interests creating the ="trms">pasts='strcls'>***, the possible ="trms">worlds...
(="ppl">Leigh ="ppl">="ppl">Star > ="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King > ="frds">Sina) “comparing the incomparable”
here i am trying an outline of my ="trms">interrelated research practices in a preliminary character, the ="trms">intersection of which I am just at the beginning to understand
="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>: ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies of the 12th century ="nms">Iran
plain style
soing naked as a sign
dress and address
="trms">ecology of ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies
(="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King='lgc'>:) ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies='lgc'>: ideologies layered in time and space ='strcls'>* under which ="trms">writing has been divided ='lgc'>[also cannot be divided='lgc'>] from other generations of cultural meaning
myriad hybrid forms, commingling in ="trms">material and ideological proliferations
(with ="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King's ="trms">interest in women's ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies)
“="trms">presentist”='lgc'>: a practice of classification and ="trms">categorization to access ="trms">pasts
continuities and local discontinuities ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> is ‘continuity’ (always) a universal abstraction='qstn'>?='strcls'>**
relative universalization
prescrptions for speech and silence
what is gained and what is lost when “tidying up the archive”='qstn'>? (a german problem)
prescriptions for speech and silence
“politeness ="trms">phenomena”
‘plain speech’ for Quakers='lgc'>: rejection of ‘idle’ speech. preaching was another version of sacrificing seld-will, and was appropriate speech.
public preaching in particular was also a challenge to ="trms">social ="trms">relations and ="trms">interaction ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> a challenge to gender, speaking public was a cultural humiliation for individual women ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the Quaker women practiced preaching as a personal humiliation ="trms">instrumental to their own salvation ='lgc'>[! in a weird way i also did this to my self='lgc'>] ='at'>#becoming woman='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{a liquefying aspect='lgc'>: “womanhood” was used ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphorically to identify those who could not preach, the surrender of (male) ="trms">authority to God by men was “female”
="lsts lst1">•inhibiting woman's prophetic ="trms">agencies
="lsts lst1">•“lack of discipline” becomes discipline ='lgc'>--!='lgc'>='lgc'>--> forms of discipline that appear “undisciplined” or out of control
(="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King > Mack='lgc'>:) “Quakers not only bathed in a sea of poly="trms">morphous sipritual ="trms">nature and ="trms">eroticism; they occasionally wrote as if they had succeeded in floating above gender altogether”
“going naked as a sign” (and Quaker's “plain style”) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> Tasavof, ="nms">ajayeb, and ="trms">communication strategies of the so-called new ="trms">science of the same time (of Quakers)
‘nakedness’ was ="trms">simultaneously ="trms">literally his own, a figure of the ="trms">world, an ='thdf'>example of many others, the abstract principle, and the essential truth of the one addressed
="prgrph">-simplicity, economy, and plainness; to reject all the amplifications, digressions, and swellings of style
preferring ="trms">language of artisans, countrymen, merchants, of wits and scholars
How sin is strengthened 1657
Milk for babes 1661
A message from the spirit of truth 1658
realized eschatology
انا الحق, an-al-hagh
(Damrosch='lgc'>:) the performance of the sign thus entailed a doubly negative aspect='lgc'>: in the person exhibiting it, a conviction of fulfilling a divine mandate in op="trms">position to personal self-="trms">interest; and in those who witnessed it, an offense to ordinary ="trms">social standards that actually served to authenticate it.
='strcls'>*the function of the sign was to bear prophetic witness rather than to get practical results; it fulfilled its purpose simply by being performed='strcls'>*
='at'>#shath, shathiat ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> tazkirat, ='lgc'>-='lgc'>='lgc'>-->='lgc'>{ what the saints of Tasavof (reported by ="ppl">Attar-='lgc'>{his “virtual witnessing” of “awliya” اولیا as a “realized"='lgc'>}, Quakers ='lgc'>[as illegal nonconformist sect='lgc'>]) put together was their own ="trms">writing ="trms">technology infrastructure='strcls'>** ='lgc'>='lgc'>==> ='strcls'>**="trms">routinization of charisma='strcls'>** ='lgc'><='lgc'>-- organizational structure ='lgc'>["advices and queries” نفحات الانس nafahat ='lgc'>~-> rationalized ="trms">systematic intellectualizations='lgc'>]='lgc'>}
pattern of suffering that the believer ="trms">literally and personally relives
(is Tasavof developed ="frds scrmbld"nttrm="Christianson">Christian modality of sacrifice='qstn'>? is ='strcls'>*passivity imported from elsewhere in Islam='strcls'>*='qstn'>?)
a protagonist, like San'an, like an actor in a mystery play, enacting in a deliberately challenging form, ="trms">internalized and lived as a potent sign
(Bechwith='lgc'>:) rendered performance of ="trms">religious ="trms">materials both practically impossible and conceptually unthinkable
='lgc'>+ exercises their discipline of the senses and the ="trms">imagination
='strcls'>*undisciplined loss of control in enthusiasm and in this extravagant example='strcls'>*
(="trms">stories of) a small group of powerful and vocal actors
='strcls'>***to attend to the local practices of in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion and ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion through which some speak and others are spoken for, some act and others are acted upon='strcls'>***
(='at'>#="trms">ontology)
gentlemanly practices ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (ask) what that legitimacy consisted in and how far it extended='qstn'>?
(wellborn connoisseurs of the new ="trms">science)
="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%">
leave the work tacit, and it fades into the wallpaper
="lsts lst1">•(="ppl">Leigh ="ppl">="ppl">Star's) ethnography of infrastructure
="lsts lst1">•(="ppl">="ppl">Bowker's) infra-structural inversion
="lsts lst1">•(="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King's) ="trms">ecology of ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies='lgc'>: massive, large-scale infrastructure in dynamic motion, bits changing at ="trms">differential rates across time, made up of layered sub-="trms">systems complexity ="trms">interconnected and animated by distributed ="trms">agencies, in="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">cluding people, ="trms">skills, devices and ="trms">social powers.
the ="trms">translation between (='lgc'>[my='lgc'>] deliberately) ="trms">presentist (="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta-)="trms">language (of cybernetic ="trms">systems) and various local ="trms">languages helps ='strcls'>*to rescale particular objects of study='strcls'>*
(='mywrk'>my research='lgc'>: “="trms">social studies of”) studying ="trms">animal subjectivity ='lgc'>--(changes the way)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> studying infrastructures ='lgc'>--requires='lgc'>='lgc'>--> one to think (explicitly) about scale and range ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> boundaries/connections between one ="trms">system and another ='lgc'>--(what counts as)='lgc'>='lgc'>--> working sub-="trms">systems and various essential forms of “black-boxing” (that describe and use these infrastructures)
="prgrph">-="ppl">Katie ="ppl">King's accounts of black-boxing (that might ="trms">matter in conversations about) 17th century ="trms">writing ="trms">technologies='lgc'>:
="lsts lst2">◦reification='lgc'>: strategic metonymic reduction, kenaye کنایه
="lsts lst2">◦enthusiasm='lgc'>: essentializing identities or ideas
="lsts lst2">◦="trms">members (of Royal ="trms">Society)='lgc'>: ="trms">naturalizing ranges of in="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion and ex="trms">="trms"nttrm="cluster,club">clusion
="lsts lst2">◦='strcls'>*witnessing='strcls'>* rescales the infrastructure. the “work of witnessing” asserts that rhetoic as an element of witnessing is not a thing, not even a performance, but al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready itself a complex set of infrastructural ="trms">systems with animating practices and ="trms">agencies
...="trms"nttrm="already,spread">readers might submit to the illusion of having effectively witnessed an experiment themselves
='strcls'>*virtual witnessing realized an “enactment” in words='strcls'>*
="large lg4" stl="font-size:111%">
black-boxing is totally neccessary to use/study infrastructures, they produce the “artifactual richness” ='lgc'>[= a kind of archaeological layering of artifacts acquired in bits and pieces over time='lgc'>--(Lucy Suchman)='lgc'>] of ="trms">systems
='strcls'>*black-boxing makes elegant some elements of the ="trms">system/s ="trms">differentially='strcls'>*
each ="trms">author does it='lgc'>:
="lsts lst1">•Shapin black-boxing his range of ="trms">systems to its complexity and elegance
="lsts lst1">•="ppl">="ppl">Haraway appropriating ='thdf'>the idea of modest witness for her own feminist purpose
="lsts lst1">•
three ="trms">technologies for fact-making (that Shapin and Schaffer name)='lgc'>:
="lstsrd">1. ="trms">material
="lstsrd">2. ="trms">literary
="lstsrd">3. ="trms">social
Adrian Johns in The ="trms">Nature of The ="trms">Book='lgc'>: particular ="trms">booksellers could indeed use their ='strcls'>*stewardship='strcls'>* of such heterogeneous spaces to further political ideals and ="trms">interests. behind the s="trms">cenes and up the stairs, an ="trms">interested London ="trms">bookseller became a significant actor in cultural events.
nominal ="trms">agency
actual person
principle architect
="large lg5" stl="font-size:150%">
="trms">systems move in space, time, and process
some archaeological structures (that one uncover) are stable, some in motion, some evolving, some decaying ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ='strcls'>*“there is no way of ever getting access to the ="trms">past except through classification ="trms">systems of one ="trms">sort or another”='strcls'>* (at best) the ="trms">past could be reordered to better reflect multiple constituencies now and then. (="ppl">="ppl">Bowker ='lgc'>+ ="ppl">Leigh ="ppl">="ppl">Star)
(my ="nms">ajayeb research='lgc'>: “="trms">epistemic virtues” ='lgc'>[or powers='lgc'>] of the 12th century encyclopedic ="trms">wonder-="trms">books,) “="trms">epistemological decorum” ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> (to capture) “truth-making practices in action” (Shapin)
='lgc'>='lgc'>==> (my commitment to ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>:) engendering reflection on the ="trms">natur[...]