[...]tical ='lgc'>:
when we are talking about (re)uniting curricula, linking fields in humanities we are talking about not bringing together two things that are separate, but actually ="trms">interogating the distribution of power, a way a distributing agancies.

it is not a “common ="trms">world” to discover, it is a common ="trms">world to be produced. and the only way to produce it, is through the usual tools that we have in our disposal, which are comming from ‘re="trms">presentation.’

="trms">compose ='lgc'>=/= discover/uncover

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

enterances in ="nms">ajayeb work, al="trms"nttrm="already,spread">ready generating form='lgc'>:
='strcls'>*-fire (talking fire)
='strcls'>*-darkness (Zolmat)
='strcls'>*-jinn
='strcls'>*-="trms">veil (="nms">pardeh)='lgc'>--purity of ="trms">veiled o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin; hidden matrix of signification (on which theoretical work secretly depends='qstn'>?) ='lgc'>[also ="trms"nttrm="already,spread">reading the secularization and the lifting of the ="trms">veil, prostitute paradigm, conceptions of ="trms">love,='lgc'>]
='strcls'>*-wall(='qstn'>?)

="large lg2" stl="font-size:112%">
“truth” is ="trms">veild, ="trms">according to middle east (truth ='lgc'><='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--> ="nms">pardeh پرده)
begining with the ="trms">Greeks’ notion of basanos, relating truth to torture, a strictly constellated confluence of acts equally troubling to ="ppl">Aristotle and ="ppl">Aristophanes.

="lsts lst1">•="nms">pardeh-dari پرده دری, hajeb حاجب (after neghabat نقابت is hejabat حجابت ='lgc'>[Beyhaghi='lgc'>]) (="ppl">Nezami in Leili-o-majnun='lgc'>: haft arus-e noh emari bar dargah-e to be ="nms">pardeh-dari (هفت عروس نو عماری بر درگه تو به پرده داری) ='lgc'>--='qstn'>?='lgc'>='lgc'>--> angelology) ='lgc'>=/=='qstn'>? ="nms">hayula(ism) هیولی


="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

hermeneutics regarding Jurisprudence (feghh فقه) and theology depend on the exegesis of ="trms">written texts. in both cases the process of understanding is an act of application(='qstn'>?)

="trms">interpretation/hermenutice ='lgc'>=/= commons/collectivsm
(ta'vil bayad dar jahate axe harkate jami va moshtarek bashad)

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

(="ppl">Kohn) to “provincialize” (rustayi روستایی, bastani باستانی='qstn'>?) ="trms">language in order to make room for another kind of thought='lgc'>--a kind of thought that is more capacious, one that holds and sustains the human.

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

my point in ="trms">animals without ="trms">narrative is that the ="trms">apparatus that is working for ="ppl">Attar in his re="trms">presentation of ="trms">birds is the same as the ="trms">narrative tool in the so-called ="trms">wildlife documentary series which produces ="trms">nature='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--a sy.

="large lg1" stl="font-size:142%">
transcend is about ="trms">traveling from ="trms">trope to truth (obur az majaz be haghighat عبور از مجاز به حقیقت,) from virtual to concret. but that is too easily reversible. my point is to stop this ="trms">transference and ="trms">interrogate the ="trms">trope itself. ='mywrk'>my work in amazon ="trms">book is about this ‘majaz’ (مجاز), an ="trms">interface that we are inhabiting.

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

the main (and only='qstn'>?) ="trms">question in ='mywrk'>my work/performance/="trms">lecture is ‘when’ the gift will/have pass(ed) on.
='lgc'>='lgc'>--> holding on to, preparing, strategizing, spontaneity, and so on

="prgrph">-my texture aversion and preference in soft/hard fabric of ="trms">language and ="trms">material tonality='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> the “inanimate ="trms">affections” (that give us pleasure in life) ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> we often give each other soft gifts as a way to care for one another (='at'>@="frds scrmbld">Janina)
='strcls'>*radical ="trms">affection does not require intentional politics='strcls'>* (="ppl">Chen)



='lgc'>[="ppl">Shepard 2004='lgc'>] Stanner (W. E. H. Stanner, White Man Got No Dreaming) describes how the universe became a moral ="trms">system and consists of three elements='lgc'>: marvels, ="trms">species diversity, and institutions. Marvels refer to that ="trms">presence of the unexpected that one always encounters sooner or later in ="trms">nature, particularly when the terrain reflects something about the mind that implies a common structure. His second element, ="trms">species diversity, coincides with one of the major moral issues of our time='lgc'>--the extinction of ="trms">species and reduction of biodiversity.

="prgrph">-“marvels of af="trms">finity” is the key to reality, revealing how things are, what is known, and how to behave.

="trms">cosmogony (keyhan-zayi کیهان زایی‌)='lgc'>--how the universe became a moral ="trms">system

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[modes of existence='lgc'>]

="trms">science studies ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="trms">science
what was ="trms">science before ="trms">science studies='qstn'>? it was engaged in a ="trms">sort of stupefaction that prevented meaningful study.

we do not take the fight against X (="trms">religion, fetish, etc.) for the truth about X.

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">Avital='lgc'>]

i am adding “mama's boy” (bache-nane بچه ننه) to my short bio (nothing is added by “me,” everything is told to me.)


='thdf'>thanks to all the people who have given me their ‘sides’ (didn't necessorily confronted me)


(="trms">book, ketabat کتابت)
to do something to resignify and breakup the serenity and the serene closure of the ="trms">book, as the universiy values it and seals it
="prgrph">-what deals does it seal='qstn'>?
="prgrph">-the commitment to breaking up the ="trms">book and its ="trms">="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">metaphysically laden pitch for closural sovereignty.
="prgrph">-="trms">linguistic pollutants
="prgrph">-dirty talks

='at'>#as a mode of ="trms">writing, make a ="trms">folding (fractal) ="trms">book, style of ="trms">children ="trms">books, for ="nms">ajayeb
(what would this structure mean='qstn'>? and how is that expandable='qstn'>?)

='at'>#making a cheap ="trms">horror short-film from one of the ="nms">ajayebs

='at'>#="trms">write a X-man short ="trms">story in ="nms">Tehran context with ="nms">iranian everyday characters
="lsts lst1">•jurassic park ='lgc'>='lgc'>--> ="nms">="nms">ajayeb al makhlughat عجایب المخلوقات (="trms">horror, ="trms">sublime, shivering water)
="lsts lst1">•nonapocalyptic ="trms">stories and the other="trms">worldly hauntingly familiar in the lost faces of forest (called ="nms">Tehran='qstn'>?)

(accourding to Egyptian 1550 BCE,) ="trms">book='lgc'>: a loose collection of magic spells intended to assist a dead person's journey through under="trms">world, and into the afterlife and ="trms">written by many priests
="prgrph">-are ="trms"nttrm="listen,alist,ilist,llist,olist,ylist,ulist">lists the o="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigin of ="trms">writing='qstn'>? (...way before the installation of the ="trms">modern scriptural ="trms">apparatus)



theory-minded academics have ="trms"nttrm="righ,rigo,riga,rigi,trig,rign">rigorously repudiated='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--or forgotten ="trms">poetry. ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--> ="trms">poetic deprogrammmg

cohabitation of two sovereign ="trms">linguistic attitudes='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--the grammars and behaviors that we as="trms">sociate with figures of ="trms">literary performance and philosophical ="trms">positing

18th century
rise of increasingly more mathematical and ="trms">symbolic logics
more ="trms">literary types of discursive formations,


="ppl">Wordsworth, ="ppl">Rilke, and ="ppl">Keats disavowing ="ppl">Paul ="ppl">de Man='qstn'>?!
="ppl">Freud without ="ppl">Goethe or ="ppl">Schiller='qstn'>?!
="ppl">Benjamin off ="ppl">Baudelaire='qstn'>?!
="ppl">Derrida deprived of ="ppl">Mallarme, Ponge, or ="ppl">Celan='qstn'>?!
="ppl">Heidegger abandoned by Trakl or ="ppl">Holderlin='qstn'>?!


increasing ="trms">technicization of critical ="trms">language


colloquy, soliloquy
they are called to witness distinct regions of being ='lgc'>==> assuming the destiny of ="trms">difference
='prcnt'>% denken und dichten is at stake in the ='strcls'>*theory of mourning

="display:block;white-space:nowrap;margin-bottom:-1em;overflow:hidden;">...................................

='lgc'>[="ppl">="ppl">Stengers='lgc'>]

the ="trms">storyteller ='lgc'>: “some people ="trms">love to divide and classify, while others are bridge-makers='lgc'>--weaving ="trms">relations that ='strcls'>**turn a divide into a living contrast='strcls'>**, one whose power is to ="trms">affect, to produce thinking and feeling”

(regarding my footnote fetish) ... because ="trms">writing such footnotes implies ='strcls'>*feeling the text='strcls'>* as an ='strcls'>*animating power='strcls'>*

philosophy ='lgc'>=='qstn'>? a form of textual animation ='lgc'>{='lgc'>='lgc'>--> approaching the work of ="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>}

to turn the ='lgc'>[="nms">ajayeb='lgc'>] (animist) modes of experience (existence), awareness, and knowl="trms"nttrm="knowledge,Knowledge">edge into living contrasts (intensely powerful bridge-making tools)

can we reappropriate without reanimate='qstn'>? ='lgc'>='lgc'>='lgc'>--='lgc'>--> i think if we deconstructively talk about the reappropriations of meaning we might allow animation to constitute itself.

="prgrph">-how to train yourself in spotting relevant ="trms">questions and unilaterally ='lgc'>[einseitig='lgc'>] imposed ="trms">questions='qstn'>? (their ="trms">differences) ='lgc'>[='lgc'>~='qstn'>? mofti مفتی, fatva فتوا ='lgc'>=/= khotbe خطبه='lgc'>]
(to put the ‘="trms">question’ at risk)

="large lg3" stl="font-size:112%"> ='strcls'>*milieu-thinking='strcls'>* (to think by the milieu) ='lgc'>:
1. no reference to the ground
2. never separating from milieu

(Virgin Mary requires a milieu ='lgc'>[of ="trms">symbolic efficacy, ="trms">categories of belief, etc.='lgc'>])

what is the milieu of ="nms">ajayeb='qstn'>? (ghalamrov قلمرو, mohite ejtemayi محیط اجتمایی‌, its ="trms">ecology)


="large lg4" stl="font-size:112%"> “="trms">natural”='lgc'>: that which ="trms">science will eventually explain ='lgc'>==> ="trms">nature ='lgc'>=/= “="trms">natural”

“="trms">nature”='lgc'>: that larger, older, and wiser con="trms">figuration that gets credit for ingenuity (instead of the creature's bodily know-how) by the call of the ="trms">scientist


عجایب ="nms">ajayeb's ="trms">relations to the ="trms">world, rhizomatic connections to other practices that likewise explore a ="trms"nttrm="metaph,metamorph,metabol,metal">meta="trms">morphic (rather than re="trms">presentational) ="trms">relation


="large lg5" stl="font-size:112%"> Earth ='lgc'>=/= cradle

[...]